Lorentz Force: Equation (SI Units)
Lorentz Force: Equation (SI Units)
Lorentz Force: Equation (SI Units)
Article Talk
Read Edit
View history
Search
Lorentz force
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Navigation
In physics, particularly electromagnetism, the Lorentz force is the combination of electric and magnetic force on a point charge due
Main page
Electromagnetism
to electromagnetic fields. If a particle of charge q moves with velocity v in the presence of an electric field E and a magnetic field B,
Contents
Featured content
Current events
then it will experience a force. For any produced force there will be an opposite reactive force. In the case of the magnetic field, the
reactive force may be obscure, but it must be accounted for.
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikimedia Shop
ElectricityMagnetism
(in SI units). Variations on this basic formula describe the magnetic force on a current-carrying wire (sometimes called Laplace
force), the electromotive force in a wire loop moving through a magnetic field (an aspect of Faraday's law of induction), and the
Interaction
Electrostatics
Electric chargeStatic electricity
Help
force on a charged particle which might be traveling near the speed of light (relativistic form of the Lorentz force).
Electric fieldConductor
About Wikipedia
The first derivation of the Lorentz force is commonly attributed to Oliver Heaviside in 1889,[1] although other historians suggest an
InsulatorTriboelectricity
Community portal
earlier origin in an 1865 paper by James Clerk Maxwell.[2] Hendrik Lorentz derived it a few years after Heaviside.[citation needed]
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
Related changes
Upload file
Ampre'slawMagnetic field
2 History
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
MagnetizationMagnetic flux
BiotSavartlaw
7 EMF
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Electromagnetic induction
Faraday's law
Maxwell's equations
Electromagnetic field
()
Contents
1 Equation (SI units)
Electrostatic dischargeInduction
Electromagnetic radiation
Jefimenko's equations
Eddy current
13 Applications
Catal
London equations
14 See also
etina
Electrical network
15 Footnotes
Dansk
16 References
Deutsch
VoltageResistance
17 External links
Eesti
Ohm's law
Espaol
Esperanto
[edit]
Electromotive forceCapacitance
InductanceImpedance
Franais
Resonant cavitiesWaveguides
Covariant formulation
Hrvatski
The force F acting on a particle of electric charge q with instantaneous velocity v, due to an external electric field E and magnetic
Bahasa Indonesia
Electromagnetic tensor
(stressenergytensor)
slenska
Four-current
Italiano
Electromagnetic four-potential
Scientists
Basa Jawa
where is the vector cross product. All boldface quantities are vectors. More explicitly stated:
AmpreCoulombFaradayGauss
HeavisideHenryHertzLorentz
MaxwellTeslaVoltaWeber
Latina
rsted
Latvieu
in which r is the position vector of the charged particle, t is time, and the overdot is a time derivative.
Magyar
A positively charged particle will be accelerated in the same linear orientation as the E field, but will curve perpendicularly to both the
Nederlands
instantaneous velocity vector v and the B field according to the right-hand rule (in detail, if the thumb of the right hand points along
v t e
v and the index finger along B, then the middle finger points along F).
Norskbokml
Norsk nynorsk
Piemontis
term "Lorentz force" refers specifically to the formula for the magnetic force,[5] with the total electromagnetic force (including the
Polski
electric force) given some other (nonstandard) name. This article will not follow this nomenclature: In what follows, the term "Lorentz
Portugus
force" will refer only to the expression for the total force.
Romn
The magnetic force component of the Lorentz force manifests itself as the force that acts on a current-carrying wire in a magnetic
Shqip
Simple English
Slovenina
Slovenina
/srpski
For a continuous charge distribution in motion, the Lorentz force equation becomes:
Srpskohrvatski /
Suomi
where dF is the force on a small piece of the charge distribution with charge dq. If both sides of this equation are divided by the
Svenska
volume of this small piece of the charge distribution dV, the result is:
Tagalog
/tatara
where f is the force density (force per unit volume) and is the charge density (charge per unit volume). Next, the current density
Trke
Edit links
The total force is the volume integral over the charge distribution:
ByeliminatingandJ, using Maxwell's equations, and manipulating using the theorems of vector calculus, this form of the equation
can be used to derive the Maxwell stress tensor , in turn this can be combined with the Poynting vector S to obtain the
electromagneticstressenergytensor T used in general relativity.[6]
In terms of and S, another way to write the Lorentz force (per unit 3d volume) is[6]
where c is the speed of lightanddenotesthedivergence of a tensor field. Rather than the amount of charge and its velocity in electric and magnetic fields, this
equation relates the energy flux (flow of energy per unit time per unit distance) in the fields to the force exerted on a charge distribution. See Covariant formulation of
classical electromagnetism for more details.
History
[edit]
Early attempts to quantitatively describe the electromagnetic force were made in the
mid-18th century. It was proposed that the force on magnetic poles, by Johann
Tobias Mayer and others in 1760[citation needed], and electrically charged objects, by
Henry Cavendish in 1762[citation needed], obeyed an inverse-square law. However, in
both cases the experimental proof was neither complete nor conclusive. It was not
until 1784 when Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, using a torsion balance, was able to
definitively show through experiment that this was true.[7] Soon after the discovery in
1820 by H.C.rsted that a magnetic needle is acted on by a voltaic current, AndrMarieAmpre that same year was able to devise through experimentation the
formula for the angular dependence of the force between two current elements.[8][9]
The modern concept of electric and magnetic fields first arose in the theories of
In all these descriptions, the force was always given in terms of the properties of the
objects involved and the distances between them rather than in terms of electric
Michael Faraday, particularly his idea of lines of force, later to be given full
mathematical description by Lord Kelvin and James Clerk Maxwell.[11] From a modern perspective it is possible to identify in Maxwell's 1865 formulation of his field
equations a form of the Lorentz force equation in relation to electric currents,[2] however, in the time of Maxwell it was not evident how his equations related to the forces
on moving charged objects. J. J. Thomson was the first to attempt to derive from Maxwell's field equations the electromagnetic forces on a moving charged object in terms
of the object's properties and external fields. Interested in determining the electromagnetic behavior of the charged particles in cathode rays, Thomson published a paper
in 1881 wherein he gave the force on the particles due to an external magnetic field as[1]
Thomson derived the correct basic form of the formula, but, because of some miscalculations and an incomplete description of the displacement current, included an
incorrect scale-factor of a half in front of the formula. It was Oliver Heaviside, who had invented the modern vector notation and applied them to Maxwell's field equations,
that in 1885 and 1889 fixed the mistakes of Thomson's derivation and arrived at the correct form of the magnetic force on a moving charged object.[1][12][13] Finally, in
1892, Hendrik Lorentz derived the modern form of the formula for the electromagnetic force which includes the contributions to the total force from both the electric and
the magnetic fields. Lorentz began by abandoning the Maxwellian descriptions of the ether and conduction. Instead, Lorentz made a distinction between matter and the
luminiferous aether and sought to apply the Maxwell equations at a microscopic scale. Using Heaviside's version of the Maxwell equations for a stationary ether and
applying Lagrangian mechanics (see below), Lorentz arrived at the correct and complete form of the force law that now bears his name.[14][15]
[edit]
[edit]
While the modern Maxwell's equations describe how electrically charged particles and currents or moving charged
particles give rise to electric and magnetic fields, the Lorentz force law completes that picture by describing the force
acting on a moving point charge q in the presence of electromagnetic fields.[3][16] The Lorentz force law describes the
effect of E and B upon a point charge, but such electromagnetic forces are not the entire picture. Charged particles
are possibly coupled to other forces, notably gravity and nuclear forces. Thus, Maxwell's equations do not stand
separate from other physical laws, but are coupled to them via the charge and current densities. The response of a
point charge to the Lorentz law is one aspect; the generation of E and B by currents and charges is another.
In real materials the Lorentz force is inadequate to describe the behavior of charged particles, both in principle and
as a matter of computation. The charged particles in a material medium both respond to the E and B fields and
generate these fields. Complex transport equations must be solved to determine the time and spatial response of
charges, for example, the Boltzmann equation or the FokkerPlanckequation or the NavierStokesequations. For
example, see magnetohydrodynamics, fluid dynamics, electrohydrodynamics, superconductivity, stellar evolution. An
entire physical apparatus for dealing with these matters has developed. See for example, GreenKuborelations and
Green's function (many-body theory).
[edit]
In many textbook treatments of classical electromagnetism, the Lorentz force Law is used as the definition of the
electric and magnetic fields E and B.[17][18][19] To be specific, the Lorentz force is understood to be the following
empirical statement:
The electromagnetic force F on a test charge at a given point and time is a certain function of its charge q and velocity v, which can be parameterized by exactly two
vectors E and B, in the functional form:
This is valid; countless experiments have shown that it is, even for particles approaching the speed of light (that is, magnitude of v = |v| = c).[20] So the two vector fields E
and B are thereby defined throughout space and time, and these are called the "electric field" and "magnetic field". Note that the fields are defined everywhere in space
and time with respect to what force a test charge would receive regardless of whether a charge is present to experience the force.
Note also that as a definition of E and B, the Lorentz force is only a definition in principle because a real particle (as opposed to the hypothetical "test charge" of
infinitesimally-small mass and charge) would generate its own finite E and B fields, which would alter the electromagnetic force that it experiences. In addition, if the
charge experiences acceleration, as if forced into a curved trajectory by some external agency, it emits radiation that causes braking of its motion. See for example
Bremsstrahlung and synchrotron light. These effects occur through both a direct effect (called the radiation reaction force) and indirectly (by affecting the motion of
nearby charges and currents). Moreover, net force must include gravity, electroweak, and any other forces aside from electromagnetic force.
[edit]
When a wire carrying an electrical current is placed in a magnetic field, each of the moving charges, which comprise the
current, experiences the Lorentz force, and together they can create a macroscopic force on the wire (sometimes called the
Laplace force[citation needed]). By combining the Lorentz force law above with the definition of electrical current, the following
equation results, in the case of a straight, stationary wire:
\mathbf{F} = I \boldsymbol{\ell} \times \mathbf{B} \,\!
where is a vector whose magnitude is the length of wire, and whose direction is along the wire, aligned with the direction of
conventional current flow I.
If the wire is not straight but curved, the force on it can be computed by applying this formula to each infinitesimal segment of
wire d, then adding up all these forces by integration. Formally, the net force on a stationary, rigid wire carrying a steady
current I is
\mathbf{F} = I\int \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{\ell}\times \mathbf{B}
This is the net force. In addition, there will usually be torque, plus other effects if the wire is not perfectly rigid.
One application of this is Ampre'sforcelaw, which describes how two current-carrying wires can attract or repel each other, since each experiences a Lorentz force from
the other's magnetic field. For more information, see the article: Ampre'sforcelaw.
EMF
[edit]
B) component of the Lorentz force is responsible for motional electromotive force (or motional EMF), the phenomenon underlying many
electrical generators. When a conductor is moved through a magnetic field, the magnetic force tries to push electrons through the wire, and this creates the EMF. The
term "motional EMF" is applied to this phenomenon, since the EMF is due to the motion of the wire.
In other electrical generators, the magnets move, while the conductors do not. In this case, the EMF is due to the electric force (qE) term in the Lorentz Force equation.
The electric field in question is created by the changing magnetic field, resulting in an induced EMF, as described by the MaxwellFaradayequation (one of the four
modern Maxwell's equations).[21]
Both of these EMF's, despite their different origins, can be described by the same equation, namely, the EMF is the rate of change of magnetic flux through the wire.
(This is Faraday's law of induction, see above.) Einstein's special theory of relativity was partially motivated by the desire to better understand this link between the two
effects.[21] In fact, the electric and magnetic fields are different faces of the same electromagnetic field, and in moving from one inertial frame to another, the solenoidal
vector field portion of the E-field can change in whole or in part to a B-field or vice versa.[22]
[edit]
The two are equivalent if the wire is not moving. Using the Leibniz integral rule and that div B = 0, results in,
[edit]
See also: Mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field, Maxwell's equations and Helmholtz decomposition
The E and B fields can be replaced by the magnetic vector potential A and (scalar) electrostatic potential by
\mathbf{E} = - \nabla \phi - \frac { \partial \mathbf{A} } { \partial t }
\mathbf{B} = \nabla \times \mathbf{A}
whereisthegradient,isthedivergence, is the curl.
The force becomes
\mathbf{F} = q\left[-\nabla \phi- \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}+\mathbf{v}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A})\right]
and using an identity for the triple product simplifies to
[edit]
and similarly for the y and z directions. Hence the force equation is:
\mathbf{F}= q(\mathbf{E} + \mathbf{\dot{r}}\times\mathbf{B})
The potential energy depends on the velocity of the particle, so the force is velocity dependent, so it is not conservative.
[edit]
where0 is the vacuum permittivityand0 the vacuum permeability. In practice, the subscripts "cgs" and "SI" are always omitted, and the unit system has to be assessed
from context.
[edit]
Thecalculationfor=2,3(forcecomponentsinthey and z directions) yields similar results, so collecting the 3 equations into one:
\frac{\mathrm{d} \mathbf{p} }{\mathrm{d} \tau} = q \gamma\left( \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B} \right) \, ,
which is the Lorentz force.
Using the definition of the Lorentz factor and the chain rule, we arrive at:
\frac{\mathrm{d} \mathbf{p} }{\mathrm{d} t} = q \left( \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B} \right)\, .
This is precisely the Lorentz force law in the non-relativistic case; however, now \vec{p} is relativistic, being equal to \vec{p}=\gamma m_0 \vec{u} .
\mathcal F is a space-time bivector (an oriented plane segment, just like a vector is an oriented line segment), which has six degrees of freedom corresponding to boosts
(rotations in space-time planes) and rotations (rotations in space-space planes). The dot product with the vector \gamma_0 pulls a vector (in the space algebra) from the
translational part, while the wedge-product creates a trivector (in the space algebra) who is dual to a vector which is the usual magnetic field vector. The relativistic
velocity is given by the (time-like) changes in a time-position vector v=\dot x , where
v^2 = 1,
(which shows our choice for the metric) and the velocity is
The proper (invariant is an inadequate term because no transformation has been defined) form of the Lorentz force law is simply
Note that the order is important because between a bivector and a vector the dot product is anti-symmetric. Upon a space time split like one can obtain the velocity, and
fields as above yielding the usual expression.
Applications
[edit]
Magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters
Railguns
Electrical generators
Linear motors
Homopolar generators
Loudspeakers
Linear alternators
See also
[edit]
Hall effect
Scalar potential
Electromagnetism
AbrahamLorentzforce
Helmholtz decomposition
Gravitomagnetism
Larmor formula
Guiding center
Ampre'sforcelaw
Cyclotron radiation
Field line
Hendrik Lorentz
Magnetic potential
Maxwell's equations
Magnetoresistance
Footnotes
1. ^ a
bc
2. ^ a
, or Griffiths.
bc
[edit]
0.
7. ^ Meyer, Herbert W. (1972). A History of Electricity and
Magnetism.Norwalk,Connecticut:BurndyLibrary.pp.3031.
ISBN 0-262-13070-X.
8. ^ Verschuur, Gerrit L. (1993). Hidden Attraction : The History
And Mystery Of Magnetism. New York: Oxford University
Press.pp.7879.ISBN 0-19-506488-7.
9. ^ Darrigol, Olivier (2000). Electrodynamics from Ampre to
SeeGriffithspages3013.
Landau,L.D.,Lifshits,E.M.,&Pitaevski,L.P.(1984).
Theoretical Physics
References
[edit]
Heinemann.p.63(49pp.205207in1960edition).ISBN 07506-2634-8.
24. ^ Roger F Harrington (2003). Introduction to electromagnetic
engineering
ISBN 0-486-43241-6.
25. ^ M N O Sadiku (2007). Elements of elctromagnetics
(Fourth ed.). NY/Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 391.
ISBN 0-19-530048-3.
26. ^ Classical Mechanics (2nd Edition), T.W.B. Kibble, European
Physics Series, Mc Graw Hill (UK), 1973, ISBN 0-07-0840180.
27. ^ Hestenes, David. "SpaceTime Calculus" .
External links
[edit]
[dead link]
Electromagnetism
by Wolfgang Bauer
Maxwell's equations
Mobile view