Edificio EXPO, c/Inca Garcilaso s/n, E-41092 Sevilla - Spain

Telephone: direct line (+34-95) 4488-284, switchboard 4488-318. Fax: 4488-426.

Internet: http://eippcb.jrc.es; Email: [email protected]
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JRC
JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE
Institute for Prospective Technological Studies

Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control
Reference Document on
Best Available Techniques for the Surface Treatment of
Metals and Plastics
Dated September 2005
This document is one of a series of foreseen documents as below (at the time of writing, not all
documents have been drafted):

Full title BREF code
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Intensive Rearing of Poultry and Pigs ILF
Reference Document on the General Principles of Monitoring MON
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Tanning of Hides and Skins TAN
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Glass Manufacturing Industry GLS
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Pulp and Paper Industry PP
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques on the Production of Iron and Steel I&S
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Cement and Lime Manufacturing Industries CL
Reference Document on the Application of Best Available Techniques to Industrial Cooling Systems CV
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor Alkali Manufacturing Industry CAK
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Ferrous Metals Processing Industry FMP
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Non Ferrous Metals Industries NFM
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Textiles Industry TXT
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Mineral Oil and Gas Refineries REF
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Large Volume Organic Chemical Industry LVOC
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Waste Water and Waste Gas
Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector
CWW
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Food, Drink and Milk Industry FM
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Smitheries and Foundries Industry SF
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques on Emissions from Storage ESB
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques on Economics and Cross-Media Effects ECM
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Large Combustion Plants LCP
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Slaughterhouses and Animals By-products
Industries
SA
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Management of Tailings and Waste-Rock in
Mining Activities
MTWR
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Surface Treatment of Metals STM
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Waste Treatments Industries WT
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Manufacture of Large Volume Inorganic
Chemicals (Ammonia, Acids and Fertilisers)
LVIC-AAF
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Waste Incineration WI
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Manufacture of Polymers POL
Reference Document on Energy Efficiency Techniques ENE
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Manufacture of Organic Fine Chemicals OFC
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Manufacture of Specialty Inorganic
Chemicals
SIC
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Surface Treatment Using Solvents STS
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Manufacture of Large Volume Inorganic
Chemicals (Solids and Others)
LVIC-S
Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in Ceramic Manufacturing Industry CER
Executive Summary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The BAT (Best Available Techniques) Reference Document (BREF) entitled Surface
Treatment of Metals and Plastics (STM) reflects an information exchange carried out under
Article 16(2) of Council Directive 96/61/EC (IPPC Directive). This executive summary
describes the main findings, a summary of the principal BAT conclusions and the associated
consumption and emission levels. It should be read in conjunction with the preface, which
explains this documents objectives; how it is intended to be used and legal terms. It can be read
and understood as a standalone document but, as a summary, it does not present all the
complexities of this full document. It is therefore not intended as a substitute for this full
document as a tool in BAT decision making.

Scope of this document

The scope of this document is based on Section 2.6 of Annex 1 of the IPPC Directive 96/61/EC:
Installations for the surface treatment of metals and plastics using an electrolytic or chemical
process where the volume of the treatment vats exceeds 30 m
3
. The interpretation of where the
volume of the treatment vats exceeds 30 m
3
is important in deciding whether a specific
installation requires an IPPC permit. The introduction to Annex I of the Directive is crucial:
Where one operator carries out several activities falling under the same subheading in the
same installation or on the same site, the capacities of such activities are added together.
Many installations operate a mixture of small and large production lines, and a mixture of
electrolytic and chemical processes, as well as associated activities. This means that all
processes within the scope, irrespective of the scale on which they are carried out, were
considered in the information exchange.

In practical terms, the electrolytic and chemical processes currently used are water-based.
Directly associated activities are also described. The document does not deal with:

hardening (with the exception of hydrogen de-embrittlement)
other physical surface treatments such as vapour deposition of metals
hot-dip galvanising and the bulk pickling of iron and steels: these are discussed in the
BREF for the ferrous metals processing industry
surface treatment processes that are discussed the BREF for surface treatment using
solvents, although solvent degreasing is referred to in this document as a degreasing
option
electropainting (electrophoretic painting), which is also discussed in the STS BREF.

Surface treatment of metals and plastics (STM)

Metals and plastics are treated to change their surface properties for: decoration and reflectivity,
improved hardness and wear resistance, corrosion prevention and as a base to improve adhesion
of other treatments such as painting or photosensitive coatings for printing. Plastics, which are
cheaply available and easily moulded or formed, retain their own properties such as insulation
and flexibility while the surface can be given the properties of metals. Printed circuit boards
(PCBs) are a special case where intricate electronic circuits are manufactured using metals on
the surface of plastics.

STM does not in itself form a distinct vertical sector as it provides a service to a wide range of
other industries. PCBs might be considered products but are widely used in manufacturing, for
example, computers, mobile phones, white goods, vehicles, etc.

Executive Summary
ii September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The market structure is approximately: automotive 22 %, construction 9 %, food and drink
containers 8 %, electrical industry 7 %, electronics 7 %, steel semis (components for other
assemblies) 7 %, industrial equipment 5 %, aerospace 5 %, others 30 %. The range of
components treated varies from screws, nuts and bolts, jewellery and spectacle frames,
components for automotive and other industries to steel rolls up to 32 tonnes and over 2 metres
wide for pressing automotive bodies, food and drink containers, etc. The transport of
workpieces or substrates varies according to their size, shape and finish specification required:
jigs (or racks) for single or small numbers of workpieces and high quality, barrels (drums) for
many workpieces with lower quality and continuous substrates (ranging from wires to large
steel coils) are processed on a continuous basis. PCBs have particularly complex production
sequences. All activities are carried out using jig equipment, therefore the activities are
described and discussed for jig plants, with supporting sections describing specific issues for
barrel, coil and PBC processing.

While no overall figures exist for production, in 2000 the large scale steel coil throughput was
about 10.5 million tonnes and about 640000 tonnes of architectural components were anodised.
Another measure of the industry size and importance is that each car contains over 4000 surface
treated components, including body panels, while an Airbus aircraft contains over two million.

About 18000 installations (IPPC and non-IPPC) exist in EU-15, although the loss of
engineering manufacturing, largely to Asia, has reduced the industry by over 30 % in recent
years. More than 55 % are specialist sub-contractors (jobbing shops) while the remainder
provide surface treatment within another installation, usually an SME. A few large installations
are owned by major companies although the vast majority are SMEs, typically employing
between 10 and 80 people. Process lines are normally modular and assembled from a series of
tanks. However, large installations are typically specialist and capital intensive.

Key environmental issues

The STM industry plays a major role in extending the life of metals, such as in automotive
bodies and construction materials. It is also used in equipment that increases safety or reduces
consumption of other raw materials (e.g. plating of aerospace and automotive braking and
suspension systems, plating precision fuel injectors for automotive engines to reduce fuel
consumption, plating materials for cans to preserve food, etc.). The main environmental impacts
relate to energy and water consumption, the consumption of raw materials, emissions to surface
and groundwaters, solid and liquid wastes and the site condition on cessation of activities.

As the processes covered by this document are predominantly water-based, the consumption of
water and its management are central themes, as it also affects the usage of raw materials and
their loss to the environment. Both in-process and end-of-pipe techniques affect the quantity and
quality of waste waters, as well as the type and quantity of solid and liquid wastes produced.
Although practice and infrastructure in the industry has improved, it is still responsible for a
number of environmental accidents and the risk of unplanned releases and their impacts is seen
to be high.

Electricity is consumed in electrochemical reactions and to operate plant equipment. Other fuels
are predominantly used for heating process vats and work space, and for drying.

The key emissions of concern to water are metals which are used as soluble salts. Depending on
the process, emissions may contain cyanides (although decreasingly), as well as surfactants
which may have low biodegradability and accumulative effects, e.g. NPE and PFOS. Effluent
treatment of cyanides with hypochlorite may result in the production of AOX. Complexing
agents (including cyanides and EDTA) can interfere with the removal of metals in waste water
treatment or remobilise metals in the aquatic environment. Other ions, e.g. chlorides, sulphates,
phosphates, nitrates and anions containing boron may be significant at a local level.

Executive Summary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 iii
The STM industry is not a major source of emissions to air, but some emissions which may be
locally important are NO
X
, HCl, HF and acid particulates from pickling operations, hexavalent
chromium mist released from hexavalent chromium plating, and ammonia from copper etching
in PCB manufacture and electroless plating. Dust, as a combination of abrasives and abraded
substrate, is generated by the mechanical preparation of components. Solvents are used in some
degreasing operations.

Applied processes and techniques

All but a few simple activities require some pretreatment (e.g. degreasing), followed by at least
one core activity (e.g. electroplating, anodising or chemical processing) and finally drying. All
processes have been developed for components hung on racks or jigs; some processes are also
carried out on components in rotating barrels, and a few are carried out on reels or large coils of
substrate. PCBs have complex manufacturing sequences that may comprise over 60 operations.
Additional information is given for barrel, coil and PCB activities.

Consumptions and emissions

The best data would relate to production throughput based on surface (m
2
) treated, but little is
available on this basis. Most data are for emission concentrations for specific plants, or ranges
for sectors or regions/countries. Apart from some cooling systems, the major use of water is in
rinsing. Energy (fossil fuel and electricity) is used for heating processes and drying. Electricity
is also used for cooling in some cases, as well as driving electrochemical processes, pumps and
process equipment, supplementary vat heating, work space heating and lighting. For raw
materials, the usage of metals is significant (although not globally, for example, only 4 % of the
nickel marketed in Europe is used in surface treatment). Acids and alkalis are also used in bulk
quantities, while other materials such as surfactants are often supplied in proprietary mixes.

Emissions are primarily to water, and about 300000 tonnes of hazardous waste is produced per
year (an average of 16 tonnes per installation), mainly as sludge from waste water treatment or
spent process solutions. There are some emissions to air of local significance, including noise.

Techniques to consider in the determination of BAT

Important issues for the implementation of IPPC in this sector are: effective management
systems (including the prevention of environmental accidents and minimisation of their
consequences, especially for soils, groundwater and site decommissioning), efficient raw
material, energy and water usage, the substitution by less harmful substances, as well as
minimisation, recovery and recycling of wastes and waste waters.

The issues above are addressed by a variety of process-integrated and end-of-pipe techniques.
Over 200 techniques for pollution prevention and control are presented in this document, under
the following 18 thematic headings:

1. Environmental management tools: Environmental management systems are essential for
minimising the environmental impact of industrial activities in general, with some measures that
are specifically important to STM, including site decommissioning. Other tools include
minimising reworking to reduce environmental impacts, benchmarking consumptions,
optimisation of process lines (most easily achieved with software) and process control.

2. Installation design, construction and operation: A number of general measures can be
applied to prevent and control unplanned releases, and these prevent the contamination of soil
and groundwater.

Executive Summary
iv September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
3. General operational issues: Techniques to protect the materials to be treated reduce the
amount of processing required and the consequent consumptions and emissions. The correct
presentation of workpieces to the process liquid reduces drag-out of chemicals from process
solutions, and agitation of the solutions ensures consistent solution concentration at the surface,
as well as removing heat from the surface of aluminium in anodising.

4. Utility inputs and their management: There are techniques to optimise electricity
consumption and to optimise the amount of energy and/or water used in cooling. Other fuels are
primarily used for heating solutions, using direct or indirect systems, and heat losses can be
controlled.

5. and 6. Drag-out reduction and control: Rinsing techniques and drag-out recovery: The main
source of contamination in the sector is raw materials being dragged out of process solutions by
the workpieces, and into rinse-waters. The retention of materials in the processes, as well as
using rinsing techniques to recover the drag-out, are crucial in reducing raw material and water
consumption, as well as reducing the waterborne emissions and amounts of wastes.

7. Other ways to optimise raw material usage: As well as the drag-out issue (above), poor
process control can lead to overdosing which increases material consumption and losses to
waste waters.

8. Electrode techniques: In some electrolytic processes, the metal anode operates at a higher
efficiency than deposition, leading to metal build-up and increased losses, which in turn
increase waste and quality problems.

9. Substitution: The IPPC Directive requires the consideration of using less hazardous
substances. Various substitution options for chemicals and processes are discussed.

10. Process solution maintenance: Contaminants build up in solutions by drag-in or by
breakdown of raw materials, etc. Techniques are discussed to remove these contaminants which
will improve finished product quality and reduce reworking for rejects, as well as saving raw
materials.

11. Process metals recovery: These techniques are often used in conjunction with drag-out
controls to recover metals.

12: Post-treatment activities: These include drying and de-embrittlement, although no data have
been provided.

13: Continuous coil large scale steel coil: These are specific techniques which apply to the
large scale treatment of steel coils and are in addition to techniques in other sections which are
applicable. They may also be applicable to other coil or reel-to-reel activities

14: Printed circuit boards: These techniques are specific to PCB manufacture, although the
general discussion of techniques applies to PCB production.

15: Air emission abatement: Some activities have emissions to air that require controlling to
meet local environmental quality standards. In-process techniques are discussed, as well as
extraction and treatment.

16: Waste water emission abatement: Waste water and the loss of raw materials can be reduced,
but very rarely to zero discharge. Additional waste water treatment techniques will depend on
the chemical species present, including metal cations, anions, oils and grease, and complexing
agents.

17: Waste management: The minimisation of waste is dealt with by drag-out control and
solution maintenance techniques. The main waste steams are sludges from waste water
treatment, spent solutions and wastes from process maintenance. Internal techniques can aid the
use of third party recycling techniques (although these are outside the scope of this document).
Executive Summary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 v
18: Noise management: Good practice and/or engineered techniques can reduce noise impacts.

BAT for the surface treatment of metals and plastics

The BAT chapter (Chapter 5) identifies those techniques that are considered to be BAT in a
general sense, based mainly on the information in Chapter 4, taking into account the Article
2(11) definition of best available techniques and the considerations listed in Annex IV of the
Directive. The BAT chapter does not set or propose emission limit values but suggests
consumption and emission values that are associated with the use of a selection of BAT.

The following paragraphs summarise the key BAT conclusions relating to the most relevant
environmental issues. Although the industry is complex in size and range of activities, the same
generic BAT apply to all, and other BAT are given that apply to specific processes. The BAT
elements will need to be adapted to the specific installation type.

Generic BAT

It is BAT to implement and adhere to environmental and other management systems. These
include benchmarking consumptions and emissions (over time against internal and external
data), optimising processes and minimising reworking. BAT is to protect the environment,
particularly soil and groundwaters, by using simple risk management to design, construct and
operate an installation, together with techniques described in this document and in the BAT
reference document on emissions from storage when storing and using process chemicals and
raw materials. These BAT aid site decommissioning by reducing unplanned emissions to the
environment, recording the history of usage of priority and hazardous chemicals and dealing
promptly with potential contamination.

BAT is to minimise electrical losses in the supply system as well as to reduce heat losses from
heated processes. For cooling, it is BAT to minimise water usage by using evaporation and/or
closed loop systems, and to design and operate systems to prevent the formation and
transmission of legionella.

It is BAT to minimise material losses by retaining raw materials in process vats and at the same
time minimise water use by controlling the drag-in and drag-out of process solutions, as well as
rinsing stages. This can be achieved by jigging and barrelling workpieces to enable rapid
draining, preventing overdosing of process solutions and using eco rinse tanks and multiple
rinsing with countercurrent flows, especially with the return of rinse-water to the process vat.
These techniques can be enhanced by using techniques to recover materials from the rinsing
stages. The reference value for water usage using a combination of these techniques is
3 - 20 litres/m
2
of substrate surface/rinse stage and limiting factors for these techniques are
described. Some material efficiency values associated with these retention and recovery
techniques are given for a sample of installations.

In some cases, the rinse flow for a specific process in a line can be reduced until the materials
loop is closed: this is BAT for precious metals, hexavalent chromium and cadmium. This is not
zero discharge, which applies to a whole process line or installation: this can be achieved in
specific cases but is not generally BAT.

Other BAT techniques to aid recycling and recovery are to identify potential waste streams for
segregation and treatment, to re-use materials such as aluminium hydroxide suspension
externally, and to recover externally certain acids and metals.

Executive Summary
vi September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
BAT includes prevention, separation of the waste water flow types, maximising internal
recycling (by treating according to the use requirements) and applying adequate treatment for
each final flow. This includes techniques such as chemical treatment, oil separation,
sedimentation and/or filtration. Before using new types or new sources of process chemical
solutions, it is BAT to test for any possible impact on the waste water treatment system and
resolve potential problems.

The following values are achieved for a sample of STM installations each using several BAT.
They should be interpreted with the assistance of the comments in Chapters 3 and 4, and the
guidance of the reference document on the general principles of monitoring:

Emission levels associated with some plants using a range of BAT*
Jig, barrel, small scale coil and other
processes other than large scale steel coil
Large scale steel coil coating
All values
are mg/l
Discharges to
public sewer
(PS) or surface
water (SW)
Additional determinands
only applicable for
surface water (SW)
discharges
Tin or ECCS Zn or Zn-Ni
Ag 0.1 0.5
Al 1 10
Cd 0.10 0.2
CN free 0.01 0.2
CrVI 0.1 0.2 0.001 0.2
Cr total 0.1 2.0 0.03 1.0
Cu 0.2 2.0
F 10 20
Fe 0.1 5 2 10
Ni 0.2 2.0
Phosphate as
P
0.5 10
Pb 0.05 0.5
Sn 0.2 2.0 0.03 1.0
Zn 0.2 2.0 0.02 0.2 0.2 2.2
COD 100 500 120 200
Total
Hydrocarbons
1 5
VOX 0.1 0.5
Suspended
Solids
5 30
4 40
(surface waters
only)

*These values are for daily composites unfiltered prior to analysis and taken after treatment and before any
kind of dilution, such as by cooling water, other process waters or receiving waters
Air emissions may affect local environmental quality and it is then BAT to prevent fugitive
emissions from some processes by extraction and treatment. These techniques are described,
with associated reference values for a sample of installations.

It is BAT to control noise by good practice techniques, e.g. closing bay doors, minimising
deliveries and adjusting delivery times, or if necessary, by specific engineered solutions.

Executive Summary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 vii
Specific BAT

It is a general BAT to use less hazardous substances. It is BAT to substitute for EDTA by
biodegradable alternatives or to use alternative techniques. Where EDTA has to be used, it is
BAT to minimise its loss and treat any remaining in waste waters. For PFOS, it is BAT to
minimise its use by controlling additions, minimising fumes to be controlled by techniques
including floating surface insulation sections: however, occupational health may be an
important factor. It can be phased out in anodising and there are alternative processes to
hexavalent chromium and alkali cyanide-free zinc plating.

It is not possible to replace cyanide in all applications, but cyanide degreasing is not BAT. The
BAT substitutes for zinc cyanide are acid or alkali cyanide free zinc, and for cyanide copper,
acid or pyrophosphate options, with some exceptions.

Hexavalent chromium cannot be replaced in hard chromium plating. BAT for decorative plating
is trivalent chromium or alternative processes such as tin-cobalt, however, at an installation
level there may be specification reasons such as wear resistance or colour that require
hexavalent chromium processing. Where hexavalent chromium plating is used, it is BAT to
reduce air emissions by techniques including covering the solution or vat and achieving closed
loop for hexavalent chromium, and in new or rebuilt lines in certain situations, by enclosing the
line. It is not currently possible to formulate a BAT for chromium passivation, although it is
BAT to replace hexavalent chromium systems in phospho-chromium finishes with non-
hexavalent chromium systems.

For degreasing, it is BAT to liaise with customers to minimise the grease or oil applied, and/or
to remove excess oil by physical techniques. It is BAT to replace solvent degreasing by other
techniques, usually water-based, except where these techniques can damage the substrate. In
aqueous degreasing systems, it is BAT to reduce the amount of chemicals and energy used by
using long-life systems with solution maintenance or regeneration.

It is BAT to increase process solution life, as well as preserving quality, by monitoring and
maintaining solutions within established limits by using techniques described in Chapter 4.

For pickling on a large scale, it is BAT to extend the life of the acid by techniques including
electrolysis. The acids may also be recovered externally.

There are specific BAT for anodising, including recovering the heat from sealing baths in
certain circumstances. It is also BAT to recover caustic etch where there is high consumption,
there are no interfering additives and the surface can meet specifications. It is not BAT to close
rinse-water cycles using deionised water, because of the cross-media impacts of the
regenerations.

For large scale continuous steel coil, in addition to the other relevant BAT, it is BAT to:

use real time process controls to optimise processes
replace worn motors by energy efficient motors
use squeeze rollers to prevent process solution drag-in and drag-out
switch the polarity of the electrodes at regular intervals in electrolytic degreasing and
electrolytic pickling
minimise oil use by using covered electrostatic oilers
optimise the anode-cathode gap for electrolytic processes
optimise conductor roll performance by polishing
use edge polishers to remove metal build-up on the edge of the strip
use edge masks to prevent excess metal build-up, and to prevent overthrow when
plating one side only.

Executive Summary
viii September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
For PCBs, in addition to the other relevant BAT, it is BAT to:

use squeeze rollers to prevent process solution drag-out and drag-in
use low environmental impact techniques for inner layer bonding steps
for dry resist: reduce drag-out, optimise the concentration and spraying of the developer
and separate the developed resist from the waste water
for etching: optimise the etchant chemical concentrations regularly, and for ammonia
etching, regenerate the etching solution and recover the copper.

Emerging techniques

Some new techniques for the minimisation of environmental impacts are under development or
in limited use and are considered emerging techniques. Five of these are discussed in Chapter 6:
integrating the surface treatments into the manufacturing production has been successfully
demonstrated in three situations but has failed to be fully implemented for various reasons. A
trivalent chromium substitute process for hard chrome plating using a modified pulse current is
well developed and has started pre-production verification in three typical applications.
Equipment costs will be higher, but will be offset by reduced power, chemical and other costs.
Substitutes for hexavalent chromium in passivation coatings are being developed to meet the
requirements of two Directives. Aluminium and aluminium-alloy plating from organic
electrolytes has successfully been demonstrated, but requires explosive and inflammable
solvents. For PCBs, high density interconnects can use less material and imaging can be
improved, with reduced chemical use, by using lasers.

Concluding remarks

The document is based on over 160 sources of information, with key information from both
industry (mainly from operators rather than suppliers) and Member States. Details of data
problems are given: primarily a lack of consistent quantitative information. The consumptions
and emissions data given are predominantly for groups of techniques, rather than individual
ones. This has resulted in some BAT being general, or no conclusions being reached, where
specific conclusions would be helpful to the industry and regulators.

There was a good general level of consensus on the conclusions and no split views were
recorded.

The information exchange and its result, i.e. this document, present an important step forward in
achieving the integrated prevention and control of pollution from the surface treatment of metals
and plastics. Further work could continue the process by providing:

up to date information on the use of PFOS and its alternatives, as well as substitute
techniques for hexavalent chromium passivation
more quantitative data for achieved environmental benefits, cross-media effects and
economics, particularly for heating, cooling, drying and water use/re-use
further information on the emerging techniques identified in Chapter 6
software for process optimisation for a variety of processes and in a choice of
languages.

Executive Summary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 ix
Other important recommendations beyond the scope of this BREF but arising from the
information exchange are:

the development of strategic environmental goals for the industry as a whole
a list of industry research priorities
organising club or co-operative activities, in particular to deliver some of this further
work
using a club approach to develop third party recovery for certain wastes (particularly
metals and pickling acids) where in-process techniques are not available
development of the infinitely recyclable concept for metals and metal finishing to
advise producers and consumers
development and promotion of performance-based standards to increase acceptance of
new techniques with better environmental performance.

The information exchange has also exposed some areas that would benefit from R&D projects
such as:

extension of bath life and/or metal recovery for electroless plating. These baths have
very limited life and are a major source of waste metals
techniques to measure surface area of workpieces quickly and cheaply would assist the
industry in controlling more readily its processes, costs, and in turn, consumptions and
emissions. The techniques should include relating surface area to other throughout
measures such as metal consumption or tonnage of substrate throughput
options for further use of modulated current techniques and equipment. This technique
can overcome some of the problems of traditional steady voltage electroplating
improved materials efficiency of some identified processes.

The EC is launching and supporting, through its RTD programmes, a series of projects dealing
with clean technologies, emerging effluent treatment and recycling technologies and
management strategies. Potentially these projects could provide a useful contribution to future
BREF reviews. Readers are therefore invited to inform the EIPPCB of any research results
which are relevant to the scope of this document (see also the preface of this document).

Preface
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xi
PREFACE

1. Status of this document
Unless otherwise stated, references to the Directive in this document means the Council
Directive 96/61/EC on integrated pollution prevention and control. As the Directive applies
without prejudice to Community provisions on health and safety at the workplace, so does this
document.

This document forms part of a series presenting the results of an exchange of information
between EU Member States and industries concerned on best available technique (BAT),
associated monitoring, and developments in them. *[It is published by the European
Commission pursuant to Article 16(2) of the Directive, and must therefore be taken into account
in accordance with Annex IV of the Directive when determining best available techniques].

* Note: bracket will be removed once the procedure of publication by the Commission is
completed.

2. Relevant legal obligations of the IPPC Directive and the definition of BAT

In order to help the reader understand the legal context in which this document has been drafted,
some of the most relevant provisions of the IPPC Directive, including the definition of the term
best available techniques, are described in this preface. This description is inevitably
incomplete and is given for information only. It has no legal value and does not in any way alter
or prejudice the actual provisions of the Directive.

The purpose of the Directive is to achieve integrated prevention and control of pollution arising
from the activities listed in its Annex I, leading to a high level of protection of the environment
as a whole. The legal basis of the Directive relates to environmental protection. Its
implementation should also take account of other Community objectives such as the
competitiveness of the Communitys industry thereby contributing to sustainable development.

More specifically, it provides for a permitting system for certain categories of industrial
installations requiring both operators and regulators to take an integrated, overall look at the
polluting and consuming potential of the installation. The overall aim of such an integrated
approach must be to improve the management and control of industrial processes so as to ensure
a high level of protection for the environment as a whole. Central to this approach is the general
principle given in Article 3 that operators should take all appropriate preventative measures
against pollution, in particular through the application of best available techniques enabling
them to improve their environmental performance.

The term best available techniques is defined in Article 2(11) of the Directive as the most
effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation
which indicate the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing in principle the
basis for emission limit values designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, generally
to reduce emissions and the impact on the environment as a whole. Article 2(11) goes on to
clarify further this definition as follows:

techniques includes both the technology used and the way in which the installation is
designed, built, maintained, operated and decommissioned;

available techniques are those developed on a scale which allows implementation in the
relevant industrial sector, under economically and technically viable conditions, taking into
consideration the costs and advantages, whether or not the techniques are used or produced
inside the Member State in question, as long as they are reasonably accessible to the operator;

best means most effective in achieving a high general level of protection of the environment
as a whole.
Preface
xii September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Furthermore, Annex IV of the Directive contains a list of considerations to be taken into
account generally or in specific cases when determining best available techniques bearing in
mind the likely costs and benefits of a measure and the principles of precaution and prevention.
These considerations include the information published by the Commission pursuant to
Article 16(2).

Competent authorities responsible for issuing permits are required to take account of the general
principles set out in Article 3 when determining the conditions of the permit. These conditions
must include emission limit values, supplemented or replaced where appropriate by equivalent
parameters or technical measures. According to Article 9(4) of the Directive, these emission
limit values, equivalent parameters and technical measures must, without prejudice to
compliance with environmental quality standards, be based on the best available techniques,
without prescribing the use of any technique or specific technology, but taking into account the
technical characteristics of the installation concerned, its geographical location and the local
environmental conditions. In all circumstances, the conditions of the permit must include
provisions on the minimisation of long-distance or transboundary pollution and must ensure a
high level of protection for the environment as a whole.

Member States have the obligation, according to Article 11 of the Directive, to ensure that
competent authorities follow or are informed of developments in best available techniques.

3. Objective of this Document

Article 16(2) of the Directive requires the Commission to organise an exchange of information
between Member States and the industries concerned on best available techniques, associated
monitoring and developments in them, and to publish the results of the exchange.

The purpose of the information exchange is given in recital 25 of the Directive, which states that
the development and exchange of information at Community level about best available
techniques will help to redress the technological imbalances in the Community, will promote
the worldwide dissemination of limit values and techniques used in the Community and will
help the Member States in the efficient implementation of this Directive.

The Commission (Environment DG) established an information exchange forum (IEF) to assist
the work under Article 16(2) and a number of technical working groups have been established
under the umbrella of the IEF. Both the IEF and the technical working groups include
representation from Member States and industry as required in Article 16(2).

The aim of this series of documents is to reflect accurately the exchange of information which
has taken place as required by Article 16(2) and to provide reference information for the
permitting authority to take into account when determining permit conditions. By providing
relevant information concerning best available techniques, these documents should act as
valuable tools to drive environmental performance.

4. Information Sources

This document represents a summary of information collected from a number of sources,
including in particular the expertise of the groups established to assist the Commission in its
work, and verified by the Commission services. All contributions are gratefully acknowledged.

5. How to understand and use this document

The information provided in this document is intended to be used as an input to the
determination of BAT in specific cases. When determining BAT and setting BAT-based permit
conditions, account should always be taken of the overall goal to achieve a high level of
protection for the environment as a whole.

Preface
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xiii
The rest of this section describes the type of information that is provided in each section of this
document.

Chapters 1 and 2 provide general information on the industrial sector concerned and on the
industrial processes used within the sector. Chapter 3 provides data and information concerning
current consumption and emission levels reflecting the situation in existing installations at the
time of writing.

Chapter 4 describes in more detail the emission reduction and other techniques that are
considered to be most relevant for determining BAT and BAT-based permit conditions. This
information includes the consumption and emission levels considered achievable by using the
technique, some idea of the costs and the cross-media issues associated with the technique, and
the extent to which the technique is applicable to the range of installations requiring IPPC
permits, for example new, existing, large or small installations. Techniques that are generally
seen as obsolete are not included.

Chapter 5 presents the techniques and the consumption and emission levels that are considered
to be compatible with BAT in a general sense. The purpose is thus to provide general
indications regarding the consumption and emission levels that can be considered as an
appropriate reference point to assist in the determination of BAT-based permit conditions or for
the establishment of general binding rules under Article 9(8). It should be stressed, however,
that this document does not propose emission limit values. The determination of appropriate
permit conditions will involve taking account of local, site-specific factors such as the technical
characteristics of the installation concerned, its geographical location and the local
environmental conditions. In the case of existing installations, the economic and technical
viability of upgrading them also needs to be taken into account. Even the single objective of
ensuring a high level of protection for the environment as a whole will often involve making
trade-off judgements between different types of environmental impact, and these judgements
will often be influenced by local considerations.

Although an attempt is made to address some of these issues, it is not possible for them to be
considered fully in this document. The techniques and levels presented in Chapter 5 will
therefore not necessarily be appropriate for all installations. On the other hand, the obligation to
ensure a high level of environmental protection including the minimisation of long distance or
transboundary pollution implies that permit conditions cannot be set on the basis of purely local
considerations. It is therefore of the utmost importance that the information contained in this
document is fully taken into account by permitting authorities.

Since the best available techniques change over time, this document will be reviewed and
updated as appropriate. All comments and suggestions should be made to the European IPPC
Bureau at the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies at the following address:

Edificio Expo, c/Inca Garcilaso, s/n, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain
Telephone: +34 95 4488 284
Fax: +34 95 4488 426
e-mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://eippcb.jrc.es

PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xv
Best Available Techniques Reference Document on the Surface
Treatment of Metals and Plastics

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................I
PREFACE.................................................................................................................................................XI
SCOPE............................................................................................................................................. XXXIII
1 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALS AND
PLASTICS.......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Industries using surface treatments ............................................................................................ 2
1.2 Industry structure and economic background............................................................................. 4
1.2.1 Type and size of installations........................................................................................... 4
1.2.2 Equipment lifetime........................................................................................................... 5
1.2.3 Technical characteristics of installations.......................................................................... 5
1.2.4 Market structure ............................................................................................................... 5
1.2.4.1 Competition.............................................................................................................. 5
1.2.4.2 Extent of the market ................................................................................................. 6
1.2.4.3 Market substitutes .................................................................................................... 6
1.2.5 Summary of general economic situation.......................................................................... 7
1.3 Specific industry activities ......................................................................................................... 7
1.3.1 Anodising of aluminium architectural panels and profiles............................................... 7
1.3.2 Large scale continuous coating of steel............................................................................ 9
1.3.3 Coil and sheet anodising for lithographic (offset) printing plates .................................. 12
1.3.4 Continuous coil processing of aluminium...................................................................... 12
1.3.5 Printed circuit boards ..................................................................................................... 12
1.4 Key environmental issues......................................................................................................... 14
1.4.1 Overall ........................................................................................................................... 14
1.4.2 Water.............................................................................................................................. 14
1.4.3 Energy............................................................................................................................ 15
1.4.4 Substances of concern.................................................................................................... 16
1.4.4.1 Metals..................................................................................................................... 18
1.4.4.2 Cyanides................................................................................................................. 19
1.4.4.3 Hypochlorite, chlorine and AOX........................................................................... 19
1.4.4.4 Surfactants.............................................................................................................. 19
1.4.4.5 Complexing agents................................................................................................. 19
1.4.4.6 Acids and alkalis .................................................................................................... 19
1.4.4.7 Other ions............................................................................................................... 20
1.4.4.8 Solvents.................................................................................................................. 20
1.4.4.9 Dusts ...................................................................................................................... 20
1.4.4.10 Wastes .................................................................................................................... 20
1.4.5 Other emissions.............................................................................................................. 20
1.4.5.1 Noise ...................................................................................................................... 20
1.4.5.2 Odour ..................................................................................................................... 21
2 APPLIED PROCESSES AND TECHNIQUES ............................................................................ 23
2.1 Delivery and storage workpieces and consumable raw materials ......................................... 27
2.1.1 Incoming workpiece and/or substrates to be treated ...................................................... 27
2.1.2 Consumable raw materials ............................................................................................. 28
2.2 Handling techniques for processing and loading for processing.............................................. 29
2.3 Workpiece or substrate pretreatment........................................................................................ 31
2.3.1 Mechanical pretreatment................................................................................................ 31
2.3.1.1 Linishing and polishing.......................................................................................... 31
2.3.1.2 Abrasive blasting.................................................................................................... 32
2.3.1.3 Deburring and/or tumbling..................................................................................... 32
2.3.2 Electrolytic and chemical polishing............................................................................... 32
2.3.2.1 Electropolishing ..................................................................................................... 33
2.3.2.2 Electropolishing with electric discharge (also known as plasma-electrolytic
polishing) ............................................................................................................... 33
2.3.2.3 Electrolytic and chemical polishing processes for aluminium............................... 34
2.3.3 Solvent degreasing......................................................................................................... 34
xvi September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.3.4 Aqueous cleaning ...........................................................................................................35
2.3.5 Other cleaning techniques ..............................................................................................36
2.3.5.1 Air knives ...............................................................................................................36
2.3.5.2 Centrifuges..............................................................................................................36
2.3.5.3 Dry ice ....................................................................................................................36
2.3.5.4 Hand wiping ...........................................................................................................36
2.3.6 Pickling, descaling and desmutting ................................................................................37
2.3.7 Etching and descaling of aluminium..............................................................................38
2.3.8 Electrolytically assisted pickling, activation and degreasing..........................................38
2.3.9 Metal stripping................................................................................................................39
2.3.10 Pretreatment of plastics (etching) ...................................................................................39
2.3.10.1 Conditioning of plastics..........................................................................................39
2.3.10.2 Etching or pickling of plastic..................................................................................40
2.4 Drag-out and rinsing.................................................................................................................40
2.5 Core activities ...........................................................................................................................41
2.5.1 Copper and copper alloy plating.....................................................................................41
2.5.1.1 Cyanide copper .......................................................................................................42
2.5.1.2 Acid copper.............................................................................................................42
2.5.1.3 Pyrophosphate copper.............................................................................................43
2.5.1.4 Brass .......................................................................................................................43
2.5.1.5 Bronze.....................................................................................................................43
2.5.2 Nickel electroplating.......................................................................................................44
2.5.2.1 Watts-type nickel solutions.....................................................................................45
2.5.2.2 Nickel sulphamate-based solutions.........................................................................46
2.5.2.3 Nickel chloride-based solutions..............................................................................47
2.5.2.4 Nickel sulphate-based solutions..............................................................................47
2.5.2.5 Other nickel plating solutions .................................................................................47
2.5.2.6 Nickel alloy plating solutions .................................................................................47
2.5.3 Chromium plating...........................................................................................................48
2.5.3.1 Bright chromium plating (hexavalent chromium electrolytes) ...............................49
2.5.3.2 Bright chromium plating (trivalent chromium electrolytes) ...................................49
2.5.3.3 Black chromium plating .........................................................................................49
2.5.3.4 Hard chromium plating...........................................................................................50
2.5.4 Zinc and zinc alloy plating .............................................................................................50
2.5.4.1 Alkaline cyanide zinc .............................................................................................51
2.5.4.2 Alkaline cyanide-free zinc......................................................................................51
2.5.4.3 Acid zinc.................................................................................................................52
2.5.4.4 Zinc alloy plating....................................................................................................52
2.5.5 Cadmium plating ............................................................................................................53
2.5.6 Tin and alloy plating.......................................................................................................54
2.5.7 Precious metal plating ....................................................................................................54
2.5.7.1 Silver.......................................................................................................................55
2.5.7.2 Gold ........................................................................................................................55
2.5.7.3 Palladium and alloys...............................................................................................56
2.5.7.4 Rhodium.................................................................................................................56
2.5.7.5 Platinum..................................................................................................................57
2.5.8 Autocatalytic plating (catalytic chemically reduced coatings) .......................................57
2.5.8.1 Autocatalytic nickel on metals................................................................................58
2.5.8.2 Autocatalytic nickel coating for plastics.................................................................59
2.5.8.3 Autocatalytic copper on metals and plastics ...........................................................59
2.5.9 Immersion or displacement coatings non-catalytic chemically reduced coatings .......60
2.5.10 Electropainting or electrocoating....................................................................................61
2.5.11 Lacquering......................................................................................................................62
2.5.12 Oiling..............................................................................................................................62
2.5.13 Anodising .......................................................................................................................62
2.5.13.1 Sulphuric acid anodising of aluminium..................................................................64
2.5.13.2 Chromic acid anodising of aluminium....................................................................65
2.5.13.3 Anodising of magnesium, titanium, tantalum and niobium....................................66
2.5.13.4 Phosphoric acid anodising ......................................................................................66
2.5.14 Colour anodising on aluminium.....................................................................................66
2.5.14.1 Immersion colouring...............................................................................................67
2.5.14.2 Electrolytic colouring .............................................................................................67
2.5.14.3 Interference colouring.............................................................................................67
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xvii
2.5.14.4 Integral colouring................................................................................................... 67
2.5.15 Sealing following anodising........................................................................................... 67
2.5.15.1 Hot sealing ............................................................................................................. 68
2.5.15.2 Cold sealing............................................................................................................ 68
2.5.16 Phosphating layer conversion coatings .......................................................................... 68
2.5.16.1 Alkali phosphating ................................................................................................. 69
2.5.16.2 Zinc phosphating.................................................................................................... 70
2.5.16.3 Manganese phosphating......................................................................................... 71
2.5.17 Chromium conversion coatings...................................................................................... 71
2.5.17.1 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings...................................................................... 72
2.5.17.2 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings on electroplated zinc layers ......................... 72
2.5.17.3 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings on copper, brass and bronze......................... 72
2.5.17.4 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings on aluminium............................................... 72
2.5.17.5 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings on magnesium and its alloys........................ 73
2.5.17.6 Trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) conversion coatings on aluminium and electroplated
zinc......................................................................................................................... 73
2.5.17.7 Topcoatings for chromate conversion coatings...................................................... 74
2.5.18 Metal colouring.............................................................................................................. 74
2.5.19 Bright dipping ................................................................................................................ 75
2.5.20 Chemical blacking oxide coatings............................................................................... 75
2.5.21 Brightening .................................................................................................................... 76
2.5.22 Etching Alkaline etching of aluminium...................................................................... 76
2.5.23 Chemical milling............................................................................................................ 77
2.6 After treatment activities.......................................................................................................... 78
2.6.1 Drying using hot water................................................................................................... 78
2.6.2 Drying using hot air ....................................................................................................... 78
2.6.3 Drying using air knives .................................................................................................. 78
2.6.4 Heat treatment for hydrogen de-embrittlement .............................................................. 79
2.7 Common techniques for water and waste water treatment, process solution maintenance and
materials recovery .................................................................................................................... 79
2.7.1 Filtration......................................................................................................................... 79
2.7.2 Absorption techniques.................................................................................................... 79
2.7.3 Crystallisation ................................................................................................................ 80
2.7.4 Atmospheric evaporation ............................................................................................... 80
2.7.5 Vacuum evaporation ...................................................................................................... 80
2.7.6 Electrolysis plating out................................................................................................ 80
2.7.7 Electrolysis oxidation.................................................................................................. 81
2.7.8 Ion exchange resin ...................................................................................................... 81
2.7.9 Electrodeionisation......................................................................................................... 81
2.7.10 Acid (resin) sorption ...................................................................................................... 81
2.7.11 Ion exchange liquid/liquid........................................................................................... 81
2.7.12 Membrane filtration ....................................................................................................... 81
2.7.13 Reverse osmosis............................................................................................................. 82
2.7.14 Diffusion dialysis ........................................................................................................... 82
2.7.15 Membrane electrolysis ................................................................................................... 82
2.7.16 Electrodialysis................................................................................................................ 82
2.8 Barrel processing...................................................................................................................... 82
2.8.1 Workpiece preparation................................................................................................... 82
2.8.2 Core activities ................................................................................................................ 82
2.8.3 Drying for barrelled components ................................................................................... 83
2.9 Continuous coil large scale steel ........................................................................................... 83
2.9.1 Entry equipment............................................................................................................. 84
2.9.2 Rinsing and drag-out ...................................................................................................... 84
2.9.3 Pretreatment ................................................................................................................... 84
2.9.3.1 Degreasing and cleaning ........................................................................................ 84
2.9.3.2 Pickling .................................................................................................................. 85
2.9.4 Coating activities electroplating.................................................................................. 85
2.9.5 Coating activities oiling .............................................................................................. 89
2.9.6 Layer conversion activities ............................................................................................ 89
2.9.7 After treatment activities................................................................................................ 89
2.9.7.1 Drying .................................................................................................................... 89
2.9.7.2 Unloading - exit looper .......................................................................................... 89
2.9.8 Continuous electrolytic zinc or zinc nickel plating activities......................................... 90
xviii September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.9.8.1 Entry equipment .....................................................................................................90
2.9.8.2 Degreasing..............................................................................................................90
2.9.8.3 Drying.....................................................................................................................92
2.9.8.4 Entry looper and tension leveller ............................................................................92
2.9.8.5 Electrolytic degreasing ...........................................................................................93
2.9.8.6 Pickling...................................................................................................................94
2.9.8.7 Electroplating..........................................................................................................95
2.9.8.8 Strip polisher...........................................................................................................96
2.9.8.9 Phosphating ............................................................................................................97
2.9.8.10 Full chromating and chromate rinsing....................................................................97
2.9.8.11 Oiling......................................................................................................................98
2.9.8.12 Exit looper ..............................................................................................................98
2.9.9 Continuous electrolytic tin plating activities ..................................................................98
2.9.9.1 Degreasing and cleaning.........................................................................................99
2.9.9.2 Pickling.................................................................................................................100
2.9.9.3 Tin plating.............................................................................................................101
2.9.9.4 Drag-out................................................................................................................102
2.9.9.5 Differential marking .............................................................................................102
2.9.9.6 Reflow tin brightening.......................................................................................102
2.9.9.7 Passivation treatments ..........................................................................................103
2.9.9.8 Oiling....................................................................................................................104
2.9.10 Continuous electrolytic chromium plating activities (electrolytic chromium coating of
steel ECCS) ...............................................................................................................105
2.9.10.1 Degreasing and cleaning.......................................................................................105
2.9.10.2 Pickling.................................................................................................................107
2.9.10.3 Chromium plating.................................................................................................107
2.9.10.4 Drag-out and rinsing.............................................................................................108
2.9.10.5 Oiling....................................................................................................................108
2.9.11 Continuous electrolytic lead coating of steel ................................................................108
2.10 Sheet processing for aluminium lithography plates................................................................108
2.10.1 Surface graining............................................................................................................109
2.10.2 Anodic oxidation (anodising) .......................................................................................109
2.10.3 Post-treatment...............................................................................................................109
2.10.4 Coating and further processing.....................................................................................109
2.11 Printed circuit board manufacturing .......................................................................................110
2.11.1 Preparatory operations..................................................................................................114
2.11.1.1 Design of board ....................................................................................................114
2.11.1.2 Generation of phototools (photo lab)....................................................................114
2.11.1.3 Screen printing......................................................................................................114
2.11.2 Production steps............................................................................................................115
2.11.2.1 Mechanical and chemical preparation ..................................................................115
2.11.2.2 Drilling .................................................................................................................116
2.11.2.3 Generation of the primary image ..........................................................................116
2.11.2.4 Plating through holes (pth, through hole plating) .................................................120
2.11.2.5 Electroplating of conductive pattern.....................................................................122
2.11.2.6 Inner layer bonding adhesion................................................................................124
2.11.2.7 Lamination............................................................................................................124
2.11.2.8 Resist stripping .....................................................................................................125
2.11.2.9 Etching..................................................................................................................127
2.11.2.10 Tin stripping .........................................................................................................128
2.11.2.11 Application of solder mask...................................................................................129
2.11.3 Additional surface finishing activities ..........................................................................131
2.11.3.1 Solder application.................................................................................................131
2.11.3.2 Nickel gold and/or tin ...........................................................................................132
2.11.3.3 Organic passivation ..............................................................................................132
2.11.3.4 Other activities Stripping (de-metallising) racks and plating baskets................132
2.12 Utility inputs ...........................................................................................................................132
2.12.1 Energy ..........................................................................................................................132
2.12.1.1 Electricity..............................................................................................................133
2.12.1.2 Fossil fuels and process heating............................................................................133
2.12.1.3 Cooling of process solutions.................................................................................134
2.12.1.4 Other energy requirements within the installation................................................134
2.12.2 Water ............................................................................................................................134
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xix
2.13 Abatement of potential releases to the environment .............................................................. 135
2.13.1 Waste water.................................................................................................................. 135
2.13.1.1 Treatment techniques ........................................................................................... 137
2.13.1.2 Organic materials ................................................................................................. 137
2.13.1.3 Acids and alkalis .................................................................................................. 138
2.13.1.4 Particulate material............................................................................................... 139
2.13.1.5 Metals soluble anions ........................................................................................ 139
2.13.1.6 Reduction of oxidation state of metal ions ........................................................... 139
2.13.1.7 Precipitation of metallic floc ................................................................................ 139
2.13.1.8 Complexing (sequestering, chelating) agents....................................................... 141
2.13.1.9 Nitrogenous materials .......................................................................................... 141
2.13.1.10 Cyanides............................................................................................................... 142
2.13.1.11 Sulphide ............................................................................................................... 142
2.13.1.12 Fluorides............................................................................................................... 142
2.13.1.13 Phosphated compounds ........................................................................................ 142
2.13.1.14 Other salts ............................................................................................................ 142
2.13.1.15 Final cleaning of effluent (polishing) ................................................................... 143
2.13.2 Wastes.......................................................................................................................... 143
2.13.2.1 Sludge dewatering................................................................................................ 143
2.13.2.2 Sludge drying ....................................................................................................... 143
2.13.2.3 Liquid wastes ....................................................................................................... 143
2.13.2.4 Other solid wastes ................................................................................................ 143
2.13.2.5 Sludge stabilisation .............................................................................................. 144
2.13.2.6 Valorisation of wastes .......................................................................................... 144
2.13.3 Waste gases and other airborne emissions ................................................................... 144
2.13.3.1 Emission sources and types.................................................................................. 144
2.13.3.2 Measures for reducing emissions ......................................................................... 145
2.13.3.3 Extraction systems ............................................................................................... 145
2.13.3.4 Waste gas treatments............................................................................................ 145
2.13.4 Noise ............................................................................................................................ 146
3 CURRENT CONSUMPTION AND EMISSION LEVELS FOR THE SURFACE
TREATMENT OF METALS AND PLASTICS ......................................................................... 147
3.1 Introduction utilities and input materials............................................................................. 147
3.2 Consumptions and emissions utilities ................................................................................. 148
3.2.1 Energy.......................................................................................................................... 148
3.2.2 Water............................................................................................................................ 148
3.2.3 Consumptions and emissions materials..................................................................... 149
3.2.3.1 Pretreatment degreasing .................................................................................... 149
3.2.3.2 Pickling ................................................................................................................ 150
3.2.3.3 Rinsing ................................................................................................................. 151
3.2.3.4 Core surface treatments........................................................................................ 151
3.3 Overall emissions ................................................................................................................... 154
3.3.1 Waste water.................................................................................................................. 154
3.3.1.1 Conclusions for waste water emissions................................................................ 161
3.3.2 Waste ........................................................................................................................... 164
3.3.3 Air emissions ............................................................................................................... 165
3.3.3.1 Conclusions for emissions to air .......................................................................... 174
3.3.4 Noise ............................................................................................................................ 178
3.4 Consumptions and emissions and for other activities ............................................................ 179
3.4.1 Continuous electrolytic tin coating of steel and continuous electrolytic chromium
coating of steel (ECCS)................................................................................................ 179
3.4.2 Continuous electrolytic zinc and zinc-nickel coating of steel ...................................... 181
3.4.3 Printed circuit board manufacturing............................................................................. 182
3.4.3.1 Water consumption in PCB production................................................................ 182
3.4.3.2 Raw materials and auxiliary products used and their potential disposal .............. 182
3.4.3.3 Waste water from PCB production ...................................................................... 186
3.4.3.4 Waste from PCB production ................................................................................ 186
3.4.3.5 Air emissions from PCB production .................................................................... 187
4 TECHNIQUES TO CONSIDER IN THE DETERMINATION OF BAT................................ 189
4.1 Management techniques......................................................................................................... 190
4.1.1 Environmental management tools................................................................................ 190
4.1.1.1 Specific EMS issues for surface treatment activities............................................ 198
xx September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.1.2 Reduction in reworking by process specification and quality control ..........................199
4.1.3 Benchmarking...............................................................................................................201
4.1.3.1 Benchmarking water consumption .......................................................................203
4.1.4 Process line optimisation..............................................................................................205
4.1.5 Real time process control .............................................................................................206
4.2 Installation design, construction and operation.......................................................................207
4.2.1 Pollution prevention from unplanned releases planning, design, construction and other
systems .........................................................................................................................207
4.2.1.1 Oil tight trays ........................................................................................................209
4.2.2 Storage of chemicals.....................................................................................................210
4.2.3 Process line type and construction................................................................................211
4.3 General operational issues ......................................................................................................212
4.3.1 Protection of workpieces and substrates - before and after treatment ..........................212
4.3.1.1 Shortening storage time ........................................................................................212
4.3.1.2 Storage and transport conditions...........................................................................213
4.3.1.3 Packaging..............................................................................................................213
4.3.1.4 Corrosion prevention coating with oil or grease...................................................214
4.3.2 Minimisation and optimisation of coatings from previous mechanical treatments - oil
and grease .....................................................................................................................215
4.3.3 Jigging ..........................................................................................................................216
4.3.4 Agitation of process solutions ......................................................................................216
4.3.5 Maintenance plant and equipment .............................................................................217
4.4 Utility inputs and their management.......................................................................................217
4.4.1 Electricity .....................................................................................................................218
4.4.1.1 Incoming high voltage supplies and large current demands .................................218
4.4.1.2 DC supply.............................................................................................................219
4.4.1.3 Energy efficient equipment...................................................................................220
4.4.1.4 Optimising process electrical efficiency...............................................................220
4.4.2 Heating of process solutions.........................................................................................221
4.4.3 Reducing heating losses from process solutions...........................................................221
4.4.4 Cooling of process solutions.........................................................................................223
4.4.4.1 Water cooling systems..........................................................................................223
4.4.4.2 Evaporation...........................................................................................................224
4.4.5 Water ............................................................................................................................225
4.4.5.1 Water supply, treatment and recycling/re-use.......................................................225
4.4.5.2 Control of water usage..........................................................................................226
4.4.5.3 Rinsing stages using recycled water .....................................................................228
4.5 Drag-in reduction....................................................................................................................229
4.6 Drag-out reduction..................................................................................................................229
4.6.1 Preliminary remarks .....................................................................................................229
4.6.2 Use of compatible chemicals ........................................................................................230
4.6.3 Reduction of drag-out jig (rack) processing ..............................................................230
4.6.4 Reduction of drag-out barrel processing.......................................................................232
4.6.5 Properties of process solutions effect on drag-out .....................................................235
4.6.6 Transition from drag-out draining to rinsing ................................................................236
4.7 Rinsing techniques and drag-out recovery..............................................................................236
4.7.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................236
4.7.2 Evaporation as a requirement for drag-out recovery ....................................................238
4.7.3 Benchmarking for rinsing.............................................................................................239
4.7.4 Eco rinse or pre-dipping ...............................................................................................239
4.7.5 Spray rinsing.................................................................................................................240
4.7.6 Manual or semi-automatic lines....................................................................................241
4.7.7 Chemical rinses ............................................................................................................242
4.7.8 Regeneration and re-use/recycling of rinsing water .....................................................243
4.7.8.1 Regeneration by ion exchange..............................................................................243
4.7.8.2 Regeneration by reverse osmosis..........................................................................244
4.7.9 Single rinsing techniques..............................................................................................244
4.7.10 Multiple rinse techniques..............................................................................................245
4.7.10.1 Multiple stage counterflow rinse ..........................................................................248
4.7.10.2 Multiple static rinse ..............................................................................................249
4.7.10.3 Dual static rinse followed by final flow rinse with recirculated water .................251
4.7.10.4 Multi-cascade rinsing with limited process line space..........................................252
4.7.11 Increasing drag-out recovery rate and closing the loop................................................253
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xxi
4.7.11.1 Addition of an eco rinse tank ............................................................................... 256
4.7.11.2 Evaporation using surplus internal energy ........................................................... 256
4.7.11.3 Evaporation using additional energy with an evaporator ..................................... 258
4.7.11.4 Electrodialysis ...................................................................................................... 260
4.7.11.5 Reverse osmosis closed loop electroplating...................................................... 261
4.7.11.6 Electrolytic chromium plating - closed loop electroplating ................................. 264
4.7.12 Combining techniques and installation-wide approaches ............................................ 265
4.7.13 Zero discharge.............................................................................................................. 267
4.8 Other techniques to optimise raw material usage................................................................... 267
4.8.1 Control of concentration of process chemicals ............................................................ 267
4.8.2 Different electrode yields............................................................................................. 269
4.8.3 Switching the polarisation of the electrodes in the electrolytic processes.................... 270
4.9 Substitution choice of raw materials and processes ............................................................ 271
4.9.1 Substitution for EDTA and other strong complexing agents (chelating agents) .......... 272
4.9.2 Substitution for, and reduction of, toxic surfactants (NPE and PFOS) ........................ 273
4.9.3 Substitution for cyanide overview ............................................................................ 274
4.9.4 Zinc electroplating ....................................................................................................... 275
4.9.4.1 Alkaline cyanide zinc........................................................................................... 275
4.9.4.2 Alkaline cyanide-free zinc ................................................................................... 275
4.9.4.3 Acid zinc .............................................................................................................. 276
4.9.4.4 Zinc alloys............................................................................................................ 277
4.9.5 Other cyanide - based solutions ................................................................................... 278
4.9.6 Substitution for, and minimisation of, hexavalent chromium...................................... 278
4.9.7 Minimisation of release of hexavalent chromium from treated surfaces ..................... 279
4.9.8 Chromium electroplating techniques ........................................................................... 280
4.9.8.1 Hexavalent chromium plating .............................................................................. 280
4.9.8.2 Cold chromium hexavalent process................................................................ 281
4.9.8.3 Trivalent chromium chloride-based electroplating process.................................. 282
4.9.8.4 Trivalent chromium sulphate electroplating process............................................ 284
4.9.9 Chromium free processes other coating processes.................................................... 285
4.9.10 Chromium conversion coatings.................................................................................... 287
4.9.10.1 Hexavalent chromium.......................................................................................... 288
4.9.10.2 Trivalent chromium conversion processes ........................................................... 288
4.9.10.3 Chromium-free conversion processes .................................................................. 289
4.9.11 Chromic acid anodising ............................................................................................... 290
4.9.12 Phosphochromating (phosphating with chromium) ..................................................... 290
4.9.13 Substitution for mechanical polishing and buffing ...................................................... 290
4.9.14 Substitution and choices for degreasing....................................................................... 291
4.9.14.1 Mechanical pre-cleaning - centrifuging ............................................................... 291
4.9.14.2 Solvent degreasing ............................................................................................... 291
4.9.14.3 Chemical aqueous (soak) degreasing ................................................................... 292
4.9.14.4 Weak emulsion degreasing................................................................................... 293
4.9.14.5 Biological degreasing........................................................................................... 295
4.9.14.6 Dry ice.................................................................................................................. 295
4.9.14.7 Ultrasonic cleaning............................................................................................... 295
4.9.14.8 Electrolytic cleaning with pH control .................................................................. 297
4.9.14.9 High performance degreasing systems................................................................. 297
4.9.15 Other degreasing techniques ........................................................................................ 298
4.9.16 Substitution by alternative processes ........................................................................... 298
4.10 Common techniques for treating waters and aqueous solutions: feed-water, rinses, waste water
treatment, process solutions, and materials recovery ............................................................. 300
4.11 Process solution maintenance................................................................................................. 305
4.11.1 Filtration of process solutions ...................................................................................... 308
4.11.2 Electrodialysis.............................................................................................................. 309
4.11.3 Retardation (acid resin sorbtion) .................................................................................. 309
4.11.3.1 Retardation regeneration of sulphuric acid anodising solution ............................ 310
4.11.4 Crystallisation of carbonates and metal sulphates........................................................ 311
4.11.5 Anodising caustic etch recovery .................................................................................. 313
4.11.6 Activated carbon treatment .......................................................................................... 314
4.11.7 Ion exchange purification of metallic contamination................................................... 314
4.11.8 Electrolysis purification of process solutions............................................................ 316
4.11.9 Electrolysis removal of surplus metal from process solutions .................................. 316
4.11.10 Electrolysis reoxidation of breakdown products ....................................................... 317
xxii September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.11.11 Membrane electrolysis for chromium solution maintenance........................................317
4.11.12 Cleaning and regeneration of phosphate solutions .......................................................319
4.11.13 Maintenance of degreasing solutions............................................................................320
4.11.13.1 Cascade (multiple) use of degreasing solutions....................................................320
4.11.13.2 Simple methods ....................................................................................................321
4.11.13.3 Static separator for degreasing baths ....................................................................321
4.11.13.4 Biological degreasing regeneration ......................................................................322
4.11.13.5 Centrifuging of degreasing baths..........................................................................325
4.11.13.6 Membrane filtration of emulsifying degreasers (micro- or ultrafiltration) ...........326
4.11.13.7 Multistage maintenance of degreasing solutions ..................................................328
4.11.13.8 Maintenance of electrolytic degreasing processes ................................................328
4.11.14 Pickling.........................................................................................................................328
4.11.14.1 Measures for decreasing pickling acid consumption ............................................329
4.11.14.2 Extension of the service life of pickling solutions by diffusion dialysis...............330
4.11.14.3 Recovery of copper from pickling baths...............................................................333
4.12 Recovery of process metals ....................................................................................................333
4.12.1 Electrolytic recovery.....................................................................................................333
4.12.2 Ion exchange recovery of precious metals from rinses..............................................336
4.12.3 Chromating...................................................................................................................337
4.12.4 Precipitation..................................................................................................................337
4.13 Post-treatment activities techniques relevant to the determination of BAT.........................337
4.13.1 Drying...........................................................................................................................337
4.13.2 De-embrittlement..........................................................................................................338
4.14 Continuous coil large scale steel coil...................................................................................338
4.14.1 Using digital process control ........................................................................................338
4.14.2 Oil tight trays................................................................................................................339
4.14.3 Energy efficiency..........................................................................................................339
4.14.3.1 Energy efficient motors ........................................................................................339
4.14.3.2 Raising the conductivity of the electrolyte ...........................................................340
4.14.4 Water efficiency ...........................................................................................................340
4.14.4.1 Re-cycling of quench waters.................................................................................340
4.14.4.2 Use of cascade rinse systems ................................................................................340
4.14.5 Squeeze rolls.................................................................................................................341
4.14.6 Electrolytic strip cleaning.............................................................................................341
4.14.7 Use of ultrafiltration systems to regenerate degreasing solution ..................................341
4.14.8 Cascade (multiple) use of degreasing solutions............................................................341
4.14.9 Control of the acid bath in the pickling section............................................................341
4.14.10 Control and management of electrolyte consumption ..................................................342
4.14.11 Switching the polarisation of the electrodes in the electrolytic processes ....................342
4.14.12 Optimisation of the anode-cathode gap ........................................................................343
4.14.13 Polishing the conductor roll..........................................................................................343
4.14.14 Using edge polishers.....................................................................................................344
4.14.15 Using edge masks .........................................................................................................344
4.14.16 Minimise use of oil by covered electrostatic oilers ......................................................345
4.14.17 Maintenance of process solutions.................................................................................345
4.14.17.1 Cleaning and recirculation of degreasing baths ....................................................345
4.14.17.2 Continuous filtering and re-use of the zinc bath...................................................346
4.14.17.3 Continuous removal of iron and re-use of the zinc bath .......................................346
4.14.17.4 Cleaning and regeneration of the phosphate bath.................................................347
4.14.17.5 Cleaning and regeneration of the chromate bath ..................................................347
4.14.18 Control of emissions to air............................................................................................348
4.14.18.1 Collection and scrubbing ......................................................................................348
4.14.18.2 Covered treatment baths .......................................................................................348
4.14.19 Waste water treatment processes ..................................................................................349
4.14.20 Recovery of residual metals from tanks .......................................................................349
4.15 Printed circuit board processing .............................................................................................349
4.15.1 Manufacture of inner layers..........................................................................................350
4.15.2 Rinsing between steps ..................................................................................................350
4.15.3 Electroless (autocatalytic) plating.................................................................................350
4.15.4 Electroplating PCBs .....................................................................................................351
4.15.5 Development of dry resist by sodium carbonate...........................................................351
4.15.6 Etching..........................................................................................................................352
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xxiii
4.15.7 Recycling of alkali etchants online with copper recovery (liquid-liquid ion-exchange)
..................................................................................................................................... 353
4.15.8 Resist stripping............................................................................................................. 355
4.15.9 Stripping of etch (tin) resist.......................................................................................... 355
4.15.10 Disposal of solutions.................................................................................................... 356
4.15.11 Solvent emissions from the application of solder mask ............................................... 357
4.16 Waste water emission abatement techniques ......................................................................... 357
4.16.1 Identification of problem flows.................................................................................... 358
4.16.2 Elimination and/or separation of the individual pollutants at the point of generation . 358
4.16.3 Separation of oils and greases (hydrocarbons) from waste water ................................ 360
4.16.4 Cyanide oxidation ........................................................................................................ 360
4.16.5 Nitrite treatment ........................................................................................................... 361
4.16.6 Chromate treatment...................................................................................................... 362
4.16.7 Flocculation and precipitation of metals ...................................................................... 363
4.16.7.1 Hydroxide precipitation........................................................................................ 363
4.16.7.2 Sulphide precipitation .......................................................................................... 364
4.16.7.3 Other flocculating agents ..................................................................................... 365
4.16.8 Complexing agents....................................................................................................... 365
4.16.9 Precipitation of anions ................................................................................................. 366
4.16.9.1 Fluoride precipitation........................................................................................... 366
4.16.9.2 Phosphate precipitation ........................................................................................ 367
4.16.9.3 Sulphate precipitation........................................................................................... 367
4.16.10 Final treatment prior to discharge ................................................................................ 368
4.16.10.1 Sedimentation....................................................................................................... 369
4.16.10.2 Flotation ............................................................................................................... 370
4.16.10.3 Filtration............................................................................................................... 371
4.16.11 Combining techniques.................................................................................................. 371
4.16.12 Zero discharge techniques............................................................................................ 371
4.16.12.1 Thermal procedures.............................................................................................. 372
4.16.12.1.1 Vacuum evaporators with vapour compression............................................ 372
4.16.12.1.2 Infrared evaporators ..................................................................................... 373
4.16.12.2 Membrane technologies with physico-chemical processes .................................. 374
4.16.12.2.1 Treatment using ultrafiltration...................................................................... 374
4.16.12.2.2 Treatment using combination of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis............ 375
4.16.13 Monitoring, final control and discharging of waste waters.......................................... 377
4.17 Waste management techniques .............................................................................................. 378
4.17.1 Generation and management of waste ......................................................................... 378
4.17.2 Waste minimisation and avoidance.............................................................................. 379
4.17.3 Re-use and recycling of waste...................................................................................... 379
4.17.4 In-house electrolytic recovery...................................................................................... 381
4.18 Air emission abatement techniques........................................................................................ 381
4.18.1 Additives ...................................................................................................................... 381
4.18.2 Air extraction, lids and treatment techniques............................................................... 382
4.18.3 Reduction of the volume of extracted air ..................................................................... 384
4.18.4 Treatment of extracted air ............................................................................................ 387
4.18.5 Air extraction control techniques ................................................................................. 387
4.18.6 Energy recovery from extracted air.............................................................................. 387
4.19 Noise management ................................................................................................................. 388
5 BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES........................................................................................... 389
5.1 Generic BAT.......................................................................................................................... 391
5.1.1 Management techniques............................................................................................... 391
5.1.1.1 Environmental management................................................................................. 391
5.1.1.2 Housekeeping and maintenance ........................................................................... 392
5.1.1.3 Minimising the effects of reworking.................................................................... 392
5.1.1.4 Benchmarking the installation.............................................................................. 393
5.1.1.5 Process line optimisation and control................................................................... 393
5.1.2 Installation design, construction and operation............................................................ 393
5.1.2.1 Storage of chemicals and workpieces/substrates.................................................. 394
5.1.3 Agitation of process solutions...................................................................................... 395
5.1.4 Utility inputs energy and water ................................................................................. 395
5.1.4.1 Electricity high voltage and large current demands .......................................... 395
5.1.4.2 Heating................................................................................................................. 396
xxiv September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
5.1.4.3 Reduction of heating losses ..................................................................................396
5.1.4.4 Cooling .................................................................................................................396
5.1.5 Waste minimisation of water and materials..................................................................397
5.1.5.1 Water minimisation in-process .............................................................................397
5.1.5.2 Drag-in reduction..................................................................................................397
5.1.5.3 Drag-out reduction................................................................................................397
5.1.5.3.1 Reduction of viscosity ..................................................................................398
5.1.5.4 Rinsing..................................................................................................................398
5.1.6 Materials recovery and waste management ..................................................................399
5.1.6.1 Prevention and reduction ......................................................................................400
5.1.6.2 Re-use ...................................................................................................................400
5.1.6.3 Materials recovery and closing the loop ...............................................................400
5.1.6.4 Recycling and recovery ........................................................................................402
5.1.6.5 Other techniques to optimise raw material usage .................................................402
5.1.7 General process solution maintenance..........................................................................402
5.1.8 Waste water emissions..................................................................................................403
5.1.8.1 Minimisation of flows and materials to be treated................................................403
5.1.8.2 Testing, identification and separation of problematic flows .................................403
5.1.8.3 Discharging waste water.......................................................................................403
5.1.8.4 Zero discharge techniques ....................................................................................405
5.1.9 Waste............................................................................................................................405
5.1.10 Air emissions ................................................................................................................405
5.1.11 Noise.............................................................................................................................408
5.1.12 Groundwater protection and site decommissioning......................................................408
5.2 BAT for specific processes .....................................................................................................408
5.2.1 Jigging ..........................................................................................................................408
5.2.2 Jig lines drag-out reduction .......................................................................................409
5.2.3 Barrel lines drag-out reduction ..................................................................................409
5.2.4 Manual lines .................................................................................................................410
5.2.5 Substitution for, and/or control of, hazardous substances ............................................410
5.2.5.1 EDTA ...................................................................................................................410
5.2.5.2 PFOS (perfluorooctane sulphonate)......................................................................411
5.2.5.3 Cyanide.................................................................................................................411
5.2.5.4 Zinc cyanide .........................................................................................................411
5.2.5.5 Copper cyanide .....................................................................................................411
5.2.5.6 Cadmium..............................................................................................................412
5.2.5.7 Hexavalent chromium...........................................................................................412
5.2.5.7.1 Decorative chromium plating .......................................................................412
5.2.5.7.2 Hexavalent chromium plating.......................................................................413
5.2.5.7.3 Chromium conversion (passivation) coatings...............................................413
5.2.5.7.4 Phospho-chromate finishes ...........................................................................413
5.2.6 Substitution for polishing and buffing..........................................................................413
5.2.7 Substitution and choices for degreasing .......................................................................413
5.2.7.1 Cyanide degreasing...............................................................................................414
5.2.7.2 Solvent degreasing................................................................................................414
5.2.7.3 Aqueous degreasing..............................................................................................414
5.2.7.4 High performance degreasing...............................................................................414
5.2.8 Maintenance of degreasing solutions............................................................................414
5.2.9 Pickling and other strong acid solutions techniques for extending the life of solutions
and recovery .................................................................................................................414
5.2.10 Recovery of hexavalent chromating solutions..............................................................415
5.2.11 Anodising .....................................................................................................................415
5.2.12 Continuous coil large scale steel coil.........................................................................415
5.2.13 Printed circuit boards (PCBs) .......................................................................................416
6 EMERGING TECHNIQUES FOR THE SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALS AND
PLASTICS ......................................................................................................................................417
6.1 Process-integrated automated plating .....................................................................................417
6.2 Substitution by trivalent chromium plating for hexavalent chromium in hard chromium
applications using modified pulse current ..............................................................................418
6.3 Substitution by chromium (III) conversion coatings for chromium (VI) conversion layers...420
6.4 Aluminium and aluminium alloy plating from organic electrolytes .......................................421
6.5 Printed circuit boards..............................................................................................................422
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xxv
6.5.1 Laser direct imaging..................................................................................................... 422
6.5.2 High density interconnects (HDI) ................................................................................ 422
6.5.3 Embedded passives ...................................................................................................... 423
7 CONCLUDING REMARKS ........................................................................................................ 425
7.1 Timing of the work................................................................................................................. 425
7.2 Sources of information........................................................................................................... 425
7.3 Degree of Consensus reached ................................................................................................ 426
7.4 Recommendations for future work......................................................................................... 426
7.5 Suggested topics for future R&D projects ............................................................................. 429
REFERENCES....................................................................................................................................... 431
GLOSSARY............................................................................................................................................ 439
8 ANNEXES ...................................................................................................................................... 453
8.1 Metals and compounds in relevant legislation and agreements.............................................. 453
8.2 PFOS (perfluorooctane sulphonate) in the surface treatment of metals and plastics ............. 455
8.3 Examples of regulatory emission limit values........................................................................ 456
8.3.1 Regulations applicable to surface treatment activities in France ................................. 458
8.4 Monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 461
8.4.1 General issues for monitoring in the surface treatment of metals and plastics ............ 461
8.4.1.1 Organic carbon..................................................................................................... 461
8.4.1.2 Air monitoring...................................................................................................... 461
8.4.2 Self monitoring of aqueous effluents from the surface treatment of metals and plastics
..................................................................................................................................... 461
8.5 Reference plants in Germany ................................................................................................. 466
8.5.1 Reference plant A......................................................................................................... 466
8.5.2 Reference plant C......................................................................................................... 474
8.5.3 Reference Plant D........................................................................................................ 478
8.5.4 Reference Plant E......................................................................................................... 482
8.5.5 Reference Plant F......................................................................................................... 488
8.5.6 Reference Plant G........................................................................................................ 494
8.5.7 Reference plant H......................................................................................................... 500
8.5.8 Reference plant K......................................................................................................... 506
8.5.9 Reference Plant L......................................................................................................... 512
8.6 Chromium usage for typical small decorative plating lines ................................................... 519
8.7 Ion exchange general description of techniques.................................................................. 520
8.8 Ultrasonic cleaning example plants..................................................................................... 524
8.9 Example plant for the reduction of the volume of extracted air ............................................. 525
8.10 Table of comments on the use of hexavalent and trivalent chromium................................... 527
8.11 Example of plant optimisation calculations ........................................................................... 531
8.12 Example calculation of the cost benefit of reducting NO
X
emissions from aluminium
brightening ............................................................................................................................. 541
8.13 Waste water minimisation and waste water-free electroplating in Germany ......................... 543
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xxvii
List of figures

Figure 1.1: Total production of coatings for aluminium.............................................................................. 7
Figure 1.2: Total European aluminium surface finishing of architectural profiles....................................... 8
Figure 1.3: Leading anodising countries in Europe...................................................................................... 8
Figure 1.4: Steel for packaging (tin plate and ECCS) production in EU-15 (in kt) ..................................... 9
Figure 1.5: Main consuming industries for tin plate and ECCS outputs .................................................... 10
Figure 1.6: Production of continuous electrolytic zinc/zinc-nickel in EU-15 (in kt) ................................. 11
Figure 1.7: Production of continuous zinc and zinc-nickel coating steel in EU-15 (in kt)......................... 11
Figure 1.8: World market for PCBs 1999 2002 per regions, value in million USD................................ 12
Figure 1.9: Number of PCB manufacturers in Europe by turnover............................................................ 13
Figure 1.10: Industry sectors served by European PCB production in 2002.............................................. 13
Figure 2.1: A simplified process line workflow diagram........................................................................... 23
Figure 2.2: Example of a jobbing shop layout ........................................................................................... 24
Figure 2.3: Common route in Chapter 2 for workpieces and substrates and the activity descriptions....... 25
Figure 2.4: Automotive body undergoing spray pre-treatment .................................................................. 28
Figure 2.5: Jig or rack plating: unloading finished components ................................................................ 30
Figure 2.6: Linishing.................................................................................................................................. 31
Figure 2.7: Section through a jig plating process line for PCB production................................................ 41
Figure 2.8: Example of mirror processing line........................................................................................... 61
Figure 2.9: Example of decorative anodising process options ................................................................... 63
Figure 2.10: Typical anodising plant layout............................................................................................... 65
Figure 2.11: Outline of typical coil coating process................................................................................... 84
Figure 2.12: Vertical cell............................................................................................................................ 87
Figure 2.13: Radial cell .............................................................................................................................. 87
Figure 2.14: Horizontal cell ....................................................................................................................... 88
Figure 2.15: Schematic of an electrolytic zinc coating line layout............................................................. 90
Figure 2.16: Spray degreasing and brushing.............................................................................................. 91
Figure 2.17: Spray rinsing.......................................................................................................................... 92
Figure 2.18: Electrolytic degreasing .......................................................................................................... 93
Figure 2.19: Pickling section...................................................................................................................... 95
Figure 2.20: Schematic of a tin coating line layout.................................................................................... 99
Figure 2.21: Schematic of a cleaner section............................................................................................. 100
Figure 2.22: Schematic of a pickler section ............................................................................................. 100
Figure 2.23: Schematic of a plating tank vertical cell ........................................................................... 101
Figure 2.24: Schematic of flow-melt section ........................................................................................... 103
Figure 2.25: Schematic of passivation treatment ..................................................................................... 104
Figure 2.26: Chrome coating line layout .................................................................................................. 105
Figure 2.27: Typical arrangement of ECCS line ...................................................................................... 106
Figure 2.28: Examples of printed circuit board construction ................................................................... 111
Figure 2.29: Flow diagram of typical printed circuit board production process sequence....................... 113
Figure 2.30: Application of dry resist ...................................................................................................... 118
Figure 2.31: Exposure of resist ................................................................................................................ 118
Figure 2.32: Development of resist .......................................................................................................... 119
Figure 2.33: Copper electroplating........................................................................................................... 122
Figure 2.34: Tin electroplating................................................................................................................. 123
Figure 2.35: Schematic of a multilayer board .......................................................................................... 125
Figure 2.36: Stripping of dry film............................................................................................................ 126
Figure 2.37: Etching................................................................................................................................. 127
Figure 2.38: Stripping of tin resist............................................................................................................ 129
Figure 2.39: Coating with solder mask .................................................................................................... 130
Figure 2.40: Curtain application by and curing of solder mask ............................................................... 130
Figure 2.41 Hot air levelling .................................................................................................................... 131
Figure 2.42: Flow diagram for a typical waste water treatment plant ...................................................... 137
Figure 2.43: Example of waste water treatment plant using ion exchange .............................................. 139
Figure 2.44: Variation of solubility of dissolved metal with pH.............................................................. 140
Figure 3.1: Continuous mass stream overview of tin plate and ECCS..................................................... 179
Figure 3.2: Continuous coating mass stream overview for zinc and zinc-nickel ..................................... 181
Figure 4.1: Definition of rinse stage......................................................................................................... 204
Figure 4.2 Encapsulated integrated chromium plating line...................................................................... 211
Figure 4.3: Example of locking flow valve.............................................................................................. 227
xxviii September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 4.4: Drop of chemical concentration in process solution due to drag-in of rinse-water and drag-out
of process solution without replenishing .................................................................................237
Figure 4.5: Drag-out recovery through eco rinse......................................................................................239
Figure 4.6 Manual spray rinsing...............................................................................................................240
Figure 4.7: Multi-level rinsing technology (cascade technology).............................................................246
Figure 4.8: Recovery of drag-out with a triple counter flow rinse............................................................248
Figure 4.9: Specific water consumption w of triple and quadruple counterflow rinses .........................249
Figure 4.10: Recovery of drag-out with triple static rinse ........................................................................250
Figure 4.11: Specific water consumption in litre per litre of drag-out W
1
triple static vs. W
2
triple counter
flow rinse .................................................................................................................................250
Figure 4.12: Dual static rinse followed by single flow rinse with recirculated water, continuously purified
in ion exchangers (IEX) ...........................................................................................................251
Figure 4.13: Increase of chemical concentration C
1
and C
2
related to number of rinsed barrels..............252
Figure 4.14: External cascade system: Single spray compartment with external cascade and concentrate
recycling ..................................................................................................................................253
Figure 4.15: Rinse-water and chemical recovery through concentration..................................................254
Figure 4.16: Specific water evaporation from process solutions, with fume extraction at the process tank
.................................................................................................................................................257
Figure 4.17: Schematic diagram of the evaporator ...................................................................................259
Figure 4.18: Operational principle of the electrical dialysis .....................................................................260
Figure 4.19: Reverse osmosis plant ..........................................................................................................261
Figure 4.20: Removal of metal lost in rinsing prior to ion exchange........................................................266
Figure 4.21: Weak emulsion degreasing system with holding tank for cleaning......................................294
Figure 4.22: Filtration of process solutions ..............................................................................................308
Figure 4.23: Retardation process ..............................................................................................................309
Figure 4.24: Operating principle of cold crystallisation ...........................................................................312
Figure 4.25: Chromic acid electrolyte regeneration by ion exchange.......................................................315
Figure 4.26: Electrolytic removal of surplus and contaminating metals...................................................316
Figure 4.27: Biological aqueous degreasing process ................................................................................323
Figure 4.28: Bypass microfiltration for extending the service lifetime extension of a degreasing solution
.................................................................................................................................................326
Figure 4.29: Regeneration of pickling solutions by dialysis.....................................................................331
Figure 4.30: Optimised cell using fluidised bed technology.....................................................................334
Figure 4.31: Recycling of alkali etchant in printed circuit board manufacture.........................................354
Figure 4.32: Treatment using a combination of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis.................................376
Figure 4.33: Jig line with lids on vats and air extraction ..........................................................................382
Figure 4.34: Example of fume extraction on top of treatment tank ..........................................................384
Figure 4.35: Single-sided extraction (W <0.5 m) .....................................................................................385
Figure 4.36: Double-sided extraction (W >0.5 m)....................................................................................385
Figure 4.37: Lid protecting free surface area, fixed to and moved with the flight bar..............................385
Figure 4.38: Lid protecting free surface area above extraction hood, movable by the transporter ...........386
Figure 8.1: Plant A process flow diagram ................................................................................................467
Figure 8.2: Plant A nickel inputs ..............................................................................................................473
Figure 8.3: Plant A nickel outputs ............................................................................................................473
Figure 8.4: Plant C process flow diagram.................................................................................................475
Figure 8.5: Plant C waste water treatment plant flow diagram.................................................................477
Figure 8.6: Plant D process flow diagram ................................................................................................480
Figure 8.7: Plant D waste water treatment flow diagram..........................................................................481
Figure 8.8: Plant E process flow diagram.................................................................................................483
Figure 8.9: Plant E waste water treatment plant flow diagram.................................................................485
Figure 8.10: Plant E zinc emissions..........................................................................................................487
Figure 8.11: Plant F process flow diagram...............................................................................................489
Figure 8.12: Plant F waste water treatment flow diagram........................................................................492
Figure 8.13: Plant G process flow diagram ..............................................................................................495
Figure 8.14: Plant G waste water treatment plant flow diagram...............................................................498
Figure 8.15: Plant H process flow diagram ..............................................................................................501
Figure 8.16: Plant H waste water treatment plant flow diagram...............................................................504
Figure 8.17: Plant K process flow diagram ..............................................................................................508
Figure 8.18: Plant K six step cascade rinse...............................................................................................510
Figure 8.19: Plant K waste water treatment plant flow diagram...............................................................511
Figure 8.20: Plant L process flow diagram...............................................................................................513
Figure 8.21: Plant L waste water treatment plant flow diagram...............................................................517
Figure 8.22: UK industry average plant schematic...................................................................................531
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xxix
Figure 8.23: Industry optimised good practice plant, SE2000............................................................... 531
Figure 8.24: Summary of improvements made from average (benchmark) plant to good practice ......... 532
Figure 8.25: Page showing where standard factors are entered for calculation........................................ 533
Figure 8.26: Page setting drag-out rates ................................................................................................... 533
Figure 8.27: Alkaline cleaning station ..................................................................................................... 534
Figure 8.28: Pickling station .................................................................................................................... 535
Figure 8.29: Post-pickle rinsing; comparison of operation and costs for average and good practice plants
and payback period.................................................................................................................. 536
Figure 8.30: Electrocleaning station......................................................................................................... 537
Figure 8.31: Plating station and rinses ..................................................................................................... 538
Figure 8.32: Chiller requirements of plating station................................................................................. 539
Figure 8.33: After passivation rinsing...................................................................................................... 540
xxx September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
List of tables

Table 1.1: Examples of key treatments and their uses ..................................................................................3
Table 1.2: Production tonnages for the year 2000 for both tin plate and ECCS by country in EU-15 .........9
Table 1.3: Number of continuous lines producing both tin plate and ECCS in EU-15 ..............................10
Table 1.4: Key substances of concern across the sector and media potentially affected ............................17
Table 2.1: Zinc and zinc alloy layer thickness as a function of industry application..................................88
Table 2.2: Gaps between anode and steel strip for different electrolytic cell types....................................89
Table 2.3: Comparison of resist layer types for primary imaging ............................................................117
Table 2.4: Comparison of desmearing processes......................................................................................121
Table 3.1: Energy losses at the surface of hot process solutions in watts/m
2
...........................................148
Table 3.2: Specific consumption of degreasing chemicals .......................................................................150
Table 3.3: Specific consumption of pickling agent...................................................................................150
Table 3.4 Metal losses from pickling and related processes.....................................................................150
Table 3.5: Metal losses from coating processes........................................................................................151
Table 3.6: Specific consumption of electrolyte ........................................................................................151
Table 3.7 Efficiency benchmarks for different zinc plating installations .................................................152
Table 3.8 Phosphating efficiencies and losses in the automotive industry ...............................................152
Table 3.9: Process efficiencies with respect to input materials.................................................................153
Table 3.10: Data sources and types for waste water discharges ...............................................................154
Table 3.11: ACEA emission values for phosphating plants .....................................................................155
Table 3.12: CETS Netherlands (VOM) Flow and load data for a contract plater.....................................156
Table 3.13: Finnish phosphate emission values........................................................................................156
Table 3.14: Heavy metal loads from electroplating installations to municipal sewerage systems............157
Table 3.15:German reference plants in Annex 8.5: percentage of input metals discharged in waste water
.................................................................................................................................................157
Table 3.16: Summary data from German surface treatment waste water samples ...................................158
Table 3.17: Summary data for waste water samples for a Netherlands factory........................................159
Table 3.18: Summary of Swedish waste water data from nine installations.............................................160
Table 3.19: UK data for emission values to waste water from 30 IPPC permit applications ...................161
Table 3.20: Summary data for emission ranges to water including values associated with potential BAT
.................................................................................................................................................163
Table 3.21: Solutions and activities which may require prevention of fugitive emissions .......................166
Table 3.22: Data sources and types for air emissions ...............................................................................167
Table 3.23: Emissions to air from alkali zinc barrel and copper-nickel barrel lines, Austria ...................167
Table 3.24: Emission to air CETS Netherlands ........................................................................................168
Table 3.25: Emissions to air from trivalent chromium plating .................................................................169
Table 3.26: Air emission values for examples of pickling and chromium plating plants in Germany .....172
Table 3.27: Air emission values for examples of activities for the surface treatment of metals in Sweden
.................................................................................................................................................173
Table 3.28: Summary data for emission ranges to air from some installations ......................................177
Table 3.29: Typical input and consumption levels for continuous steel coating by electrolytic tin or ECCS
.................................................................................................................................................180
Table 3.30: Typical emission values for continuous steel coating by electrolytic tin or ECCS ...............180
Table 3.31 Typical consumption and emission levels for continuous steel coating by zinc and zinc nickel
.................................................................................................................................................182
Table 3.32: Printed circuit boards: summary of types of consumptions and waste outputs......................185
Table 3.33: Wastes arising from PCB manufacture..................................................................................186
Table 3.34: Air emissions from PCB production......................................................................................187
Table 4.1: Information breakdown for each technique described in this chapter .....................................189
Table 4.2: Withdrawal and dwell times for jigs........................................................................................231
Table 4.3: Withdrawal and dwell times for barrels...................................................................................234
Table 4.4: Drag-out retention, barrel diameter 380 mm with 8 mm holes................................................234
Table 4.5: Drag-out retention, barrel diameter 380 mm with 2 mm holes................................................234
Table 4.6: Some recommended rinse ratios..............................................................................................237
Table 4.7: The rinsing ratio is a function of a specific rinsing quantity of water (expressed as litres of
rinsing water per litre of dragged-out electrolyte) given and the number of cascades.............246
Table 4.8: Achievable recovery rates for some multiple rinse techniques................................................247
Table 4.9 Process solutions using cyanide................................................................................................278
Table 4.10: Release of chromium (VI) from treated substrate..................................................................279
Table 4.11: Summary of non-chromium substitutes for hard and decorative chromium baths ................286
Table 4.12: Sections discussing the application of treatment techniques .................................................300
Table 4.13: Common techniques for treating aqueous systems ................................................................304
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xxxi
Table 4.14: Examples of techniques applied for maintenance of process solutions................................. 307
Table 4.15: Techniques for degreasing solution maintenance.................................................................. 320
Table 4.16: Results of the dialysis treatment on etching solutions........................................................... 331
Table 4.17: Typical capital and operating costs for a fluidised bed electrolytic cell................................ 335
Table 4.18: Solubility products of metal hydroxides and sulphides......................................................... 364
Table 4.19: Typical composition of electroplating sludge from different sources ................................... 379
Table 5.1: Levels for in-process materials efficiency............................................................................... 400
Table 5.2: Emission ranges to water associated with some BAT for some installations.......................... 404
Table 5.3: Solutions and activities which may require prevention of fugitive emissions ........................ 406
Table 5.4: Indicative emission ranges to air achieved by some installations ........................................... 407
Table 6.1: Comparison of hard chromium plating by traditional Cr(VI) and modified pulse current Cr(III)
................................................................................................................................................. 418
Table 8.1: Metals and compounds in relevant legislation and agreements .............................................. 454
Table 8.2: Emission limit values for surface treatment waste water in Europe (values in mg/l) (CETS) 456
Table 8.3: Helsinki Water Co. and Helcom emission limit values for industrial waste waters................ 457
Table 8.4: Air pollutants in surface technology ....................................................................................... 457
Table 8.5: Typical limit values for discharge of waste waters from PCB manufacture to public sewer . 458
Table 8.6:Typical values addition parameters for discharge from PCB manufacture to watercourse..... 458
Table 8.7: Plant A input materials............................................................................................................ 468
Table 8.8: Plant A service lifetime of the feeds, cycles of monitoring and refill of chemicals................ 469
Table 8.9: Plant A service life of the process baths ................................................................................. 469
Table 8.10: Plant A emission levels for heavy metals.............................................................................. 471
Table 8.11: Plant A waste quantities ........................................................................................................ 471
Table 8.12: Plant A metal constituents of electroplating sludge .............................................................. 472
Table 8.13: Plant D metals losses to waste water and waste.................................................................... 482
Table 8.14: Plant E input materials .......................................................................................................... 484
Table 8.15: Plant E service life of the solutions cycle of the monitoring and refill of chemicals ......... 484
Table 8.16: Plant E waste water emission values for heavy metals ......................................................... 486
Table 8.17: Plant E waste produced ......................................................................................................... 486
Table 8.18: Plant E unit costs per m
2
....................................................................................................... 487
Table 8.19: Plant F input materials .......................................................................................................... 488
Table 8.20: Plant F chemicals used in waste water treatment .................................................................. 490
Table 8.21: Plant F service lifetime of process solutions ......................................................................... 490
Table 8.22: Plant F heavy metals in the waste water................................................................................ 491
Table 8.23: Plant F sludge details ............................................................................................................ 492
Table 8.24: Plant F metal concentrations the sludge................................................................................ 493
Table 8.25: Plant G input materials.......................................................................................................... 496
Table 8.26: Plant G cycle of monitoring and refill of chemicals.............................................................. 497
Table 8.27: Plant G service lifetime of the process solutions................................................................... 497
Table 8.28: Plant G waste water emission values for heavy metals ......................................................... 498
Table 8.29: Plant G composition of the waste water treatment sludge..................................................... 499
Table 8.30: Plant G costs per tonne and per m
2
processed....................................................................... 500
Table 8.31: Plant H input material ........................................................................................................... 502
Table 8.32: Plant H top up cycle and service lifetime of the process solutions ....................................... 503
Table 8.33: Plant H metal concentrations in the waste water................................................................... 504
Table 8.34: Plant H waste quantities ........................................................................................................ 505
Table 8.35: Plant H consumption costs EUR/m
2
...................................................................................... 506
Table 8.36: Plant K input material ........................................................................................................... 507
Table 8.37: Plant K service lifetime of the process solutions................................................................... 509
Table 8.38: Plant K cycle of monitoring and refill of chemicals.............................................................. 509
Table 8.39: Plant K waste quantities ........................................................................................................ 511
Table 8.40: Plant L input material for plating and waste water treatment................................................ 514
Table 8.41: Plant L analytic control, refill cycle and service lifetime of the process solutions ............... 515
Table 8.42: Plant L concentration of heavy metals in the waste water after treatment ............................ 516
Table 8.43: Plant L waste-quantities ........................................................................................................ 517
Table 8.44: Plant L composition of electroplating sludge for metallurgical recycling............................. 518
Table 8.45: Plant L costs as EUR/m
2
treated ........................................................................................... 518
Table 8.46: Typical ion exchange capacities for general resin types (in milliequivalents per litre, meq/l)
................................................................................................................................................. 522
Table 8.47: Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO
X
: Cost in EUR (2001)........................................ 542
Scope
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 xxxiii
SCOPE

The scope of this document is based on Section 2.6 of Annex 1 of the IPPC Directive 96/61/EC:
Installations for the surface treatment of metals and plastics using an electrolytic or chemical
process where the volume of the treatment vats exceeds 30 m
3
.

The interpretation of where the volume of the treatment vats exceeds 30 m
3
is important in
deciding whether a specific installation requires an IPPC permit. This document does not
address this issue of interpretation. The technical working group discussed this definition and
accepted that the 30m
3
threshold is the total of the volume of all the process tanks in the
installation. This included sprays, although there were differing opinions on including
degreasing activities.

Many installations operate a mixture of small and large production lines, and a mixture of
electrolytic and chemical processes, as well as associated activities. Point 2 of Annex 1 of the
Directive notes: Where one operator carries out several activities falling under the same
subheading in the same installation or on the same site, the capacities of such activities are
added together. This means that all processes within the scope, irrespective of the scale on
which they are carried out, were considered in the information exchange.
In practical terms, the electrolytic and chemical processes currently used are water-based.
Directly associated activities are also described. This document does not deal with:

hardening (with the exception of hydrogen de-embrittlement, where it is carried out in
conjunction with electroplating)
other physical surface treatments such as vapour deposition of metals
hot-dip galvanising and the bulk pickling of iron and steels are discussed in the
reference document on Best Available Techniques in the ferrous metals processing
industry
surface treatment processes that are discussed in the reference document on Best
Available Techniques for surface treatment using solvents, although solvent degreasing
is also briefly discussed in this document as a degreasing option
electropainting (electrophoretic painting) is discussed in the reference document on Best
Available Techniques for surface treatment using solvents.

Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 1
1 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SURFACE TREATMENT
OF METALS AND PLASTICS

Treating the surfaces of metals

The surface treatment of and by metals dates back to early man using gold decoratively before
4000 BC. Gold and silver plating (including their deposit from amalgams) was well-known by
the 13th century AD, and tin plating of iron was carried out in Bohemia in 1200 AD. In the mid-
19th century, the electrodeposition of metals was discovered enabling new possibilities, which
are still being extended [4, Cramb, , 5, Hook and Heimlich, 2003, 41, 2003].

The surface properties of metals are typically changed for:

decoration and/or reflectivity
improved hardness (to maintain cutting edges and resistance to damage and wear)
prevention of corrosion.

Currently, the main areas of application are: automotive and transportation, packaging, building
and construction (for more information, see Section 1.1) [118, ESTAL, 2003]. Two further
commercial areas of application have emerged since the 1960s:

in microelectronics, especially with the advent of telecommunications and
microprocessor controls in many common appliances. These demand mass-produced
components with high conductivity capable of carrying very small electrical currents.
This is achieved by applying precious metal plating on cheaper substrates
in printing, where aluminium is usually the substrate of choice for lithographic plates.
The aluminium is first treated by electrochemical graining and anodic oxidation
(anodising) prior to photosensitive treatments.

Treating the surfaces of plastics

Plastics are now widely used in their own right and not only to replace metals. However,
although they can be easily formed, may be flexible or rigid, and are corrosion-resistant and
insulating, they lack other desirable properties. This has led to demands to change the surface
properties of these new materials for:

decoration, to achieve a high value, metal-like appearance similar to gold, brass, and
chromium
reflectivity, similar to chromium
durability, as plastics are generally softer than metals
electrical conductivity, usually in selected areas.

These requirements are met by depositing layers of metals on the surface of the plastic.

Printed circuit boards are a specific case, where intricate electronic circuits are manufactured
using metals on the surface of a plastic usually resin or glass fibre board but also plastic films.
A complicated series of processes removes and adds successive layers of metals as circuits to
connect small holes. The inside surface of these holes are also coated with metal during the
processes to enable electronic components to be subsequently soldered into them.

Chapter 1
2 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
1.1 Industries using surface treatments

The surface treatment of metals and plastics does not itself form a distinct vertical industry
sector. Surface treatments do not create products; they change the surface properties of
previously formed components or products for subsequent use. Printed circuit boards might be
considered products but are components manufactured for use in other products, and are made
by a considerable number of interdependent manufacturing stages. The surface treatment of
metals and plastics is therefore largely a service to many industries and examples of key
customers are given below:

automotive food and drink containers
aerospace printing
information systems domestic appliances
telecommunications jewellery, spectacles and ornaments
heavy engineering furniture
construction (building) clothing
bathroom fittings coinage
hardware medical.

The market structure in volume is approximately: automotive 22 %, construction 9 %, food and
drink containers 8 %, electric industry 7 %, steel semi product 7 %, electronic industry 7 %,
industrial equipment 5 %, aerospace industry 5 %, unspecified 30 % [121, France, 2003]. Table
1.1 sets out examples of key treatments and their uses.

Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 3
Treatment type Substrate Example workpieces Effect achieved
Zinc plating and chromium
passivation
Steel
Fastenings (nuts, bolts, screws, nails, specialist design, etc.) for construction, automotive,
furniture.
Automobile brake system components, windscreen washer system components.
Chassis and casings for domestic goods (TVs, Hi-fis, videos, washing machines, fridges).
corrosion protection
decoration
Hard chromium plating Steel
Heavy duty engines (marine, etc.).
Rolling mill bearings (steel and non-ferrous metal). Rollers (in paper mills).
Aerospace undercarriage and control components.
Medical equipment. Automotive shock absorbers [157, ACEA, 2004].
durability
prevention of sticking
micro-smooth surface
Chromium plating Steel coil Food, domestic and commercial products packaging (cans)
corrosion protection
decoration
Nickel, autocatalytic plating
(for subsequent chromium
plating)
Plastic, steel,
aluminium, etc.
Bathroom fittings. Furniture fittings. Textile and printing machinery.
Automotive trim [124, Germany, 2003].
decoration
corrosion protection
Nickel, electrolytic Steel
Coins (all EU currencies).
Fittings (screws, etc.). Automotive trim [157, ACEA, 2004].
corrosion protection
decoration
Copper and copper alloy
(brass) plating
Steel
Coins (all EU currencies).
Fittings.
decoration
Cadmium plating Steel Aerospace fittings.
corrosion prevention
prevention of sticking
Gold plating
Copper, printed
circuit boards
Connectors and wires for telecommunications and IS hardware.
corrosion prevention
high conductivity
Precious metal plating (gold,
silver, iridium, platinum)
Steel, copper,
brass, alloys
Jewellery, ornaments (hollowware), spectacle frames.
decoration
corrosion prevention
Anodising Aluminium
Automotive components [111, ACEA, 2003].
Aerospace wing and fuselage panels.
Building door and window frames, cladding panels.
Packaging and consumer goods.
corrosion protection
decoration (with or without colour)
Hard anodising Aluminium Bearing surfaces in turbine compressor housings for automotive engines. durability, increased hardness
Conversion coatings, such as
phosphating, chromating and
others [118, ESTAL, 2003]
Steel, aluminium
and other metals
Nuts, bolts, screws, tubes.
Engine pinions, camshafts, pistons, gears, valves.
Cold forming of wires, tubes, etc.
Food and domestic goods packaging. Automotive bodies and panels [111, ACEA, 2003].
Domestic electrical goods, etc.
corrosion protection
durability (surface lubrication for cold
drawing, or forming)
overcomes surface irregularities
adhesion of paints
Printed circuit boards (tin and
copper plating, etching,etc.)
Copper on
plastics
Control systems for aerospace, automotive products (engine management, braking, etc.),
telecommunications and IS, domestic goods.
circuit systems
Table 1.1: Examples of key treatments and their uses
Chapter 1
4 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
1.2 Industry structure and economic background

1.2.1 Type and size of installations

The surface treatment of metals and plastics discussed in this document is carried out in more
than 18300 installations (both IPPC and non-IPPC) in Europe, ranging from small private
companies to facilities owned by multinational corporations. The large majority are small or
medium enterprises (SMEs, [61, EC, 2002]); in Germany the typical number of employees is
between 10 and 80. Altogether, the industry for the surface treatment of metals and plastics
employs about 440000 people in Europe. These figures include manufacturers of printed circuit
boards. More than 10000 (55 %) are specialist surface treatment installations (known as job or
jobbing shops). The remaining 8300 (45 %) are surface treatment shops within another
installation typically also an SME. The majority of jobbing shops serve more than one industry
(see those listed in Table 1.1). There is no installation typical of the whole range of activities,
and even though there are strong similarities between sites engaged in the same activities, no
two sites will be identical. [3, CETS, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003] For gathering economic statistics,
electroplating, plating, polishing, anodising and colouring are classified under the Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) code 3471, but this includes establishments engaged in all types
of metal finishing. Companies that both manufacture and finish (surface treat) products are
classified according to the products they make. For data on sources of emissions, the industry is
classed under general purpose manufacturing processes (for emissions, NOSE-P 105.01 [2, EC,
2000]). These groupings make the extraction of data for specific surface treatments or for the
whole sector difficult as they cannot be differentiated readily from the other engineering
activities.

Surface treatment is positioned between initial workpiece or substrate manufacture and final
product assembly, completion and packaging. Treatment (both in jobbing shops and many in-
house workshops) often has low priority in the production chain, although there are significant
exceptions. Low priority can result in insufficient attention to correct and up to date
specifications, insufficient attention given in product design to minimise and reduce
consumptions, as well as a lack of investment.
Surface treatment is usually carried out after the primary metal or plastic has been formed into
workpieces or shaped substrates, such as nuts, bolts, pressed or moulded components, sheets, or
coils. They may even be sub-assemblies made of several components, often of different
materials. These components and sub-assemblies can be complex shapes which have been
pressed, cast and/or machined. However, in coil processing the surface treatment is applied
before the substrate used. The size varies from wires to steel strip 2008 mm wide. In smaller
scale reel-to-reel applications, copper, brass or other alloys are also coated. Printed circuit
boards are made from plastic or glass fibre boards which are already laminated (usually with
copper) or plastic films.

Process lines are usually modular, and small lines can be easily assembled as a series of tanks.
However, large automated lines and the modules in those installations handling steel coil on a
large scale, or large components such as parts of aircraft wings, are typically specialist, large
and capital intensive.

Most installations, particularly the jobbing shops, will operate multiple lines side by side. This
assists in increased capacity and reliability of delivery, and allows the installation to offer
different treatments (jig, coil or small scale coil, see Chapter 2) for different products and prices
and/or to offer different finishes. In these cases, point 2 of Annex 1 to the IPPC Directive
applies: Where one operator carries out several activities falling under the same subheading in
the same installation or on the same site, the capacities of such activities are added together
[1, EC, 1996].

Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 5
As an example of geographic distribution and structure of the industry, in France the industry is
widely spread, with concentrations in the south east (21 %) and the Paris area (24 %). The
number of surface treatment installations where the volume of treatment vats exceed 1.5 m
3
is
2250 (the threshold level for French national legislation), and the number where the volume of
treatment vats exceed 10 m
3
is 1260 [121, France, 2003].

1.2.2 Equipment lifetime

The vast majority of process lines are modular and the actual plant life is difficult to quantify as
individual modules are repaired or replaced as necessary. Typically, complete production lines
are only replaced at long intervals (when maintenance of individual modules is no longer
sufficient), or when radically new technology is introduced. However, for large scale surface
treatment operations such as steel coil coating and treating automotive bodies and panels, capital
investment can be many millions of euros (and up to EUR 500 million for a complete paint shop
installation) with a lifetime of 20 to 40 years. Depreciation is usually over 20 years [111,
ACEA, 2003].

1.2.3 Technical characteristics of installations

Due to the modular nature of the process lines, some techniques can be installed or changed
relatively quickly and cheaply. For instance, some process solutions are changed on a regular
basis, others are expensive with a long life and change is an investment decision. Some
techniques may require alterations or extensions to production lines. Although the modular
nature facilitates such changes, in many cases other factors will affect the ease of change, such
as the limits of transporter mechanisms and control systems, and the space available in the
installation. In-house operations tend to be for specific products. Introducing changes for these
and for plants handling larger products such as steel coil coating, aerospace parts or automotive
bodies may be technically more difficult and/or involve higher capital costs. For larger plants,
depreciation is usually between 6 and 20 years [157, ACEA, 2004].

Because of overcapacity in the sector, it is rare for totally new plants to be built. In existing
installations, it is more common to replace modules or lines.

1.2.4 Market structure

1.2.4.1 Competition

The low cost and ease of modular construction of lines is a low barrier to entry. Businesses
treating the surfaces of metals and plastics using only one or two process lines, often of small
vat volumes, are frequently in direct competition for some customers with installations
operating larger process lines utilising more abatement techniques.

While this industry serves several major manufacturing areas, there is a high concentration of
customers in some areas (such as the automotive industry) with highly competitive markets, and
surface treatment overcapacity. Very few jobbing shops are large enough to serve more than
three or four industry types or provide more than three finish options, with most company
business strategies focused on specialising in certain finish types. There are some limited
opportunities to differentiate the business by providing specialist treatment finishes and/or by
specialist quality standards, or for vertical integration such as manufacturing the components to
be treated. The in-house installation is the complete vertical integration of the business. The
large scale production lines depend on large volumes of very specific surface finishes, such as
one type of coating for steel coil, and typically opportunities for diversification or new markets
are extremely limited.

Chapter 1
6 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
1.2.4.2 Extent of the market

The geographic size of the market is often proportional to the degree of specialisation of the
treatment. Those treatments that are widely carried out by jobbing shops (such as zinc plating
with chromium passivation) are carried out on a very local basis, with customers usually
controlling the price. Other, more specialised, finishes where the higher price justifies transport
costs (such as cadmium plating or anodising of large components to aerospace specifications)
may be carried out on a national scale, or even between neighbouring countries. However, the
concentration of surface treatment installations within Europe usually means physically
extending markets brings more competitors within range.

The extent of the market for the customers goods is also an important factor. During 2001 and
2002 the volume of business in the light engineering industries fell by 30 % across Europe. This
was due to the increased exporting of the total manufacture of engineered components and
assemblies to Asia (Verbal discussions, TWG).

Current predictions for printed circuit board (PCB) production are that by 2005/6 the worldwide
PCB production may again reach the level of the boom year 2000. Due to the cost structure of
Asian competitors, the long-term competitiveness of high volume PCB production in Europe
using standard technologies remains questionable with global customers. Worldwide
overcapacity may result in further mergers and insolvencies, unless further growth is generated
in Europe. [122, UBA, 2003]

The percentage growth of multilayer boards (MLBs) and other high-tech products, including the
disproportionate growth of HDI (high density interconnect) or microvia boards, demonstrates
the technological development of European PCB production. It is expected that European PCB
manufacturers will continue to move to high-tech areas, concentrating in segments such as
sensor technology, industrial applications, telecommunications, automotive electronics, and
medical and aeronautical industries (see Section 1.3.5).

1.2.4.3 Market substitutes

Substitutes in this context [88, EIPPCB, ] means alternative, competing ways for the customer
to achieve the desired result, and not the substitution for chemicals or other processes described
in Section 4.9. Alternatives are readily available for many of the surface treatments of metals
and plastics. The customer may change to one of these alternatives because of price or for
design reasons. This type of substitution can take three forms:

a different surface treatment system. For example, electrolytic or chemical treatments
compete with surface treatments by solvent-painting: painted car door handles have
largely replaced chrome-plated ones; lithographic printing from aluminium plates can
be replaced by laser or ink jet for small runs
component manufacture from a different material. The customer may redesign the
products or components from alternative materials, reducing the need for surface
treatment. For example, paint or foodstuffs can be sold in plastic containers instead of
metal cans; lithographic plates can be produced with different substrates such as plastics
a combination of the above. Car light reflectors can now be moulded from plastic with
vapour deposition of a metal, instead of copper/nickel/chrome plating of a steel
pressing.

Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2 both show example activities where customers can switch between
anodising and other coatings, according to design trends, customer specification requirements
and cost.

Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 7
1.2.5 Summary of general economic situation

Opportunities to pass increased costs to customers are limited because of:

the large number of surface treatment installations competing for a decreasing number
of customers
the decline of engineering businesses in Europe
the increasing substitution options (as described above).

1.3 Specific industry activities

1.3.1 Anodising of aluminium architectural panels and profiles

The surface treatment of aluminium predominantly for construction use as architectural profiles
is carried out in more than 460 plants across the EU-15 and 6 non-EU-15 countries. Again,
these are mainly small or medium enterprises [9, ESTAL, 2002]. In Europe, the consumption of
anodised aluminium amounts to approximately one square metre per capita per year [118,
ESTAL, 2003].

Figure 1.1 shows the total production for both anodising and other coatings for aluminium
profiles in Europe.

Figure 1.1: Total production of coatings for aluminium
[9, ESTAL, 2002]

Chapter 1
8 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
514
635
1086
2121
1560
1274
1717
340
863
400
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Batch anodising Batch coating Coil coating Total finished Semis for building
X
1
0
0
0
t
o
n
n
e
s
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Figure 1.2: Total European aluminium surface finishing of architectural profiles
[9, ESTAL, 2002]

Figure 1.2 shows the European production of anodising by batch (jig line, see Chapter 2), other
coatings by batch, and other coatings on coils from 1996 to 2000.

Figure 1.3 shows the production of the leading four European countries for anodising of profiles
from 1996 to 2000.

12.4
20
24
63
12.8
23.3
67
46.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
France Spain Germany Italy
I
n
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
q
u
a
r
e
m
e
t
r
e
s
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Figure 1.3: Leading anodising countries in Europe
[9, ESTAL, 2002]

Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 9
1.3.2 Large scale continuous coating of steel

There are four types of electrolytic treatment systems applied to steel coil in the EU-15: tin
plate, chromium (ECCS: electrolytic chrome coated steel), zinc or zinc-nickel alloy and lead
[19, Eurofer, 2003]. In the Czech Republic, copper, brass, nickel, and zinc are applied to steel
strip in widths of 145 265 mm. [116, Czech-Republic, 2003] No data are known for other
European countries.

Electrolytic tin plate and electrolytic chromium coated steel (ECCS)

The main application for the substrate from this process is packaging. The production of
continuous electrolytic tin plate and electrolytic chromium (ECCS) in EU-15 was 4800 kt in
2000. The trend in production for both tin plate and ECCS is shown in Figure 1.4 and by
country in Table 1.2.

4923
4819
4413
4754
4917
4602
4815
4881
4488
4800
4856
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
4700
4800
4900
5000
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
X
1
0
0
0
t
o
n
n
e
s
Figure 1.4: Steel for packaging (tin plate and ECCS) production in EU-15 (in kt)
APEAL [19, Eurofer, 2003]
1
Country
Production (kt)
tin plate in 2000
nd = no data
Production (kt)
ECCS in 2000
nd = no data
Austria nd nd
Belgium 281 12
Denmark nd nd
Finland nd nd
France 886 207
Germany 802 147
Greece 69 nd
Ireland nd nd
Italy 283 67
Luxembourg nd nd
Netherlands 612 51
Portugal 76 nd
Spain 494 61
Sweden nd nd
United Kingdom 588 147
Totals for data given 4091 692
Table 1.2: Production tonnages for the year 2000 for both tin plate and ECCS by country in EU-15

1
APEAL: - The Association of European Producers of Steel for Packaging a federation of four multinational producers of steel
packaging for Europe across seven countries. This represents some 90 % of the total European production of steel for packing
and hence of tin plate and ECCS lines.
Chapter 1
10 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
EUROFER STATS [19, Eurofer, 2003]
Tin plate and ECCS activities annual turnover is in the order of EUR 3000 million and employs
directly and indirectly 15000 people.

There are installations in nine Member States. The number of continuous coil production lines
in EU Member States operating, under construction and planned is shown in Table 1.3.

Country
No of tin plate lines
nd = no data
No of ECCS lines
nd = no data
Austria nd nd
Belgium 1 1*
Denmark nd nd
Finland nd nd-
France 5 5*
Germany 3 1
Greece 1
Ireland nd nd
Italy nd nd
Luxembourg nd nd
Netherlands 4 2 including tinning*
Portugal 1 0
Spain 4 1*
Sweden nd nd
United Kingdom 2 1
* Indicates lines that can produce tin plate ECCS [119, Eurofer, 2003].
Table 1.3: Number of continuous lines producing both tin plate and ECCS in EU-15
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

Figure 1.5 shows the share of tin plate and ECCS consumption by industries in the EU-15 with
an average annual production close to five million tonnes. Steel packaging of human and pet
food represent the main application with a 48 % share, followed by general production lines (for
paint cans, industrial cans, etc.).

General line
21 %
Beverage
16 %
Aerosols
6 %
Closures
7 %
Non-packaging
2 %
Food
48 %
Figure 1.5: Main consuming industries for tin plate and ECCS outputs
APEAL [19, Eurofer, 2003]

Continuous electrolytic zinc and zinc nickel (Zn and Zn-Ni) coating of steel
Since the 1970s, the production of zinc and zinc alloy-coated steel sheet has increased
significantly. This has been largely for the automotive industry in response to the demand for
anti-corrosion guarantees and longer vehicle lifetimes.

Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 11
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
1
9
9
2
1
9
9
3
1
9
9
4
1
9
9
5
1
9
9
6
1
9
9
7
1
9
9
8
1
9
9
9
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
Total
kt
Figure 1.6: Production of continuous electrolytic zinc/zinc-nickel in EU-15 (in kt)
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

The production of continuous electrolytic Zn or Zn-Ni coating steel was 5.37 Mt in 2001. The
evolution of the production in the EU-15 is shown in Figure 1.7, below.

Figure 1.7: Production of continuous zinc and zinc-nickel coating steel in EU-15 (in kt)
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

Continuous electrolytic lead coating of steel
There is only one continuous lead coating plant in Europe (Austria). This plant will lose key
European automotive customers and is due to close by 2005 6. This is due to European
legislation controlling the amount of lead in end-of-life vehicles [99, EC, 2000].

Other continuous electrolytic coating of steel
In the Czech Republic, there is an installation for the continual application of metallic coatings
(copper, brass, nickel, zinc) on steel strip (width 145 265 mm) with a total capacity 8000 t/yr
steel. [116, Czech-Republic, 2003]

Chapter 1
12 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
1.3.3 Coil and sheet anodising for lithographic (offset) printing plates

Lithographic or offset printing uses an intermediate roller to transfer ink from a plate to paper. It
requires plate-making that is simple, quick, and economical. Aluminium is the usual substrate of
choice. There are two types of plates: [38, Ullmann, 2002/3]

pre-sensitised (PS) plates (manufactured with a photosensitised finish). Current world
sales are about 180 10
6
m
2
wipe-on plates which are not pre-coated and are coated by the printer as required. They
are still being used in some countries, mainly the United States and Eastern Europe.
Worldwide consumption amounts to about 30 10
6
m
2
.
1.3.4 Continuous coil processing of aluminium

Many hundreds of kilotonnes per year of aluminium coil are processed through lines of the main
rolling mills and other companies. Processes include cleaning, pretreatment, etching, anodising,
colouring, sealing, electrobrightening and tunnel etching [118, ESTAL, 2003].

1.3.5 Printed circuit boards

The world market for PCBs in 2002 was USD 31640 million, down 24.3 % from the market
peak in 2000 of USD 41824 million, which was a boom year for electronics (see Figure 1.8)
[122, UBA, 2003].

The European share of the world market in 2002 was 18.0 %. The shares of the other regions
were: Africa and the Middle East: 1.3 %, South East Asia: 26.4 %, Japan: 25.1 % and the
Americas 29.2 %.

6743
7734
6039
5695
10962
12625
10296
9239
9950
7958
7942
8497
10995
8362
8339
425
9124
420
520
453
1999 2000
2001 2002
Africa/Middle East
Asia/Pacific
Japan
America
Europe
15.2 %
14.7 %
9.1 %
29.4 %
1
4
.
8
%
-21.9 %
-18.4 %
-20.1 %
-23.9 %
-
1
7
.
5
%
-0.3 %
-0.2 %
-10.3 %
-5.7 %
1.2 %
+16.9 % 35779 41824 World totals 33075 - 20.9 % - 4.3 % 31640
Figure 1.8: World market for PCBs 1999 2002 per regions, value in million USD
[122, UBA, 2003]

Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 13
Production of PCBs in Europe

In 2002, the total PCB production in Europe was EUR 3422 million, and employed
29000 people at 434 plants.

The number of European manufacturers has changed significantly. In 1999, there were
612 manufacturers, which reduced to 434 by 2002. More than 80 % of these have a turnover of
less than EUR 7.5 million/yr showing the European industry is dominated by SMEs, despite the
high level of technology (see Figure 1.9).

Figure 1.9: Number of PCB manufacturers in Europe by turnover
[122, UBA, 2003]

Figure 1.10 shows the industrial sectors served in 2002.

Consumer
11.5 %
Electronic data
processing
10.7 %
Automotive
18.6 %
Others
14.2 %
Industrial
20.7 %
Telecommunication
24.3 %
Figure 1.10: Industry sectors served by European PCB production in 2002
[122, UBA, 2003]
Chapter 1
14 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
In Europe, the percentage of high-tech PCB production has grown as a proportion of the total,
showing the technological strength of the European PCB industry. This underlines the trend to
higher specification products, with ever-more detailed structures in the smallest possible
dimensions (see Section 1.2.4.2).

1.4 Key environmental issues

1.4.1 Overall

The STM industry plays a major role in extending the life of metals, such as in automotive
bodies and construction materials. It is also used in equipment that increases safety or reduces
consumption of other raw materials (e.g. plating of aerospace and automotive braking and
suspension systems, plating precision fuel injectors for automotive engines to reduce fuel
consumption, etc.). The main environmental issues arising from the surface treatment of metals
and plastics relate to energy and water consumption, the consumption of raw materials,
emissions to surface and groundwater, solid and liquid wastes and the site condition on
cessation of activities.

Surface treatments have traditionally been associated with large water usage creating a wet
working environment, although many installations have moved away from this way of working.
The chemicals used have the potential to cause environmental harm particularly to surface
waters, groundwaters and soil. Metals removed from waste waters end up in solid wastes and,
together with some used process solutions, may need special management for recovery or
disposal. The industry can discharge fumes and dust to air, as well as generating noise. The
sector is a significant user of electricity, water and non-renewable resources (metals). The
following issues are crucial:

minimisation of the consumption of raw materials, energy and water
minimisations of emissions by process management and pollution control
minimisation of waste production and its management
improvement of chemical safety and reduction of environmental accidents.

The measures to achieve better environmental performance are frequently complex and have to
be assessed in respect to their potential impacts on the product and other processes (both pre-
and post-treatment), the age and type of installation as well as the benefits to the environment as
a whole. Best available techniques will be balanced against these criteria and therefore include
changes within process units as well as end-of-pipe abatement techniques.

Sophisticated process and treatment techniques play an important part in achieving improved
environmental performance. Competent operation and regular maintenance are as essential as
the choice of technology. Important considerations therefore include good management and
working practices, good process and site design, education of the workforce on environmental
and process performance, workplace safety and accident prevention, and finally, monitoring of
the process and environmental performance.

1.4.2 Water

The activities covered in the scope of this document predominantly use aqueous solutions as the
medium, therefore the management of water, its pathways and targets the protection of surface
water, groundwater and soils are central themes. Both in-process techniques and end-of-pipe
processes can affect the type and quantity of solid and liquid wastes produced (sometimes
negatively), as well as changing the quality of waste waters.

Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 15
Process waters are often treated in on-site waste water treatment plants. The discharge is then
usually to municipal (urban) waste water (sewage) treatment plants, or if the effluent is treated
to a suitable standard, directly to surface waters. This is the principal route for chronic pollution
and can be caused by poor process controls and/or inadequate end-of-pipe controls. This may be
due to poor management and maintenance, or lack of investment.

Although the industry has improved both its practice and infrastructure in many areas, it is still
the source of a significant number of environmental accidents [44, France, 2003]. For France,
from 1992 to 2002, 1.2 % of all serious industrial water pollution incidents were attributable to
this sector, rising to 5 % for near misses [121, France, 2003]. Thames Water plc in the UK has
identified the sector as posing a high risk to sewage and water resource operations [Tempany,
2002 #18]. The impacts can include the loss of biological sewage treatment processes,
disruption of sewage sludge management, as well as damaging water resources for drinking
water use and aquatic ecosystems.

Poor housekeeping or accidents in handling and storing solutions, including the failure of
storage containers and process tanks, cause acute polluting discharges to surface waters, as well
as both chronic and acute pollution events affecting groundwaters and soils. The batch discharge
of used process solutions without adequate treatment [113, Austria, 2003], or which overload
treatment facilities, is also a cause of surface water pollution. Overload may be caused by
poorly designed or out-of-date facilities, production capacity increasing beyond the projected
design capacity, changes in process type and/or poor control of water and material usage in the
processes [158, Portugal, 2004].

Water usage is also an important issue. The largest proportion of water intake is used in rinsing
between process stages and then discharged. In some sites, significant amounts of water are
used in cooling. There may be insignificant amounts of water in wastes and there are some
losses in evaporation from drying components, hot solutions in open tanks and from some
recovery processes. Some water is used in making fresh process solutions (make up); the service
life of these solutions varies according to the activity and throughput.

1.4.3 Energy

Electricity is consumed in electrolytic and other electrochemical reactions (inter alia,
electroplating and anodic oxidation). Electricity is also used to operate the process plant and
equipment such as pumps, transporter equipment, other motors and compressors. It may also be
used for supplementary vat heating (by immersion heaters) as well as space heating and lighting
in the installation.

There are transmission losses when electricity is transformed from high to low voltages [111,
ACEA, 2003]. Energy can also be lost when drawing from more than one phase (reactive
energy), as well as in DC (direct current) supplies to the treatment lines. Energy is lost, too, as
heat when electric current is passed through the treatment solutions: some process chemistries
are less energy efficient than others.

Energy is also consumed in raising the temperature of the process baths, in drying components
and for other heating activities. Losses occur from evaporation and as radiant heat from
equipment. Some process chemistries require more heat energy than others. Energy is also used
in drying workpieces or substrate and in extracting process fumes. [158, Portugal, 2004]

Cooling can consume significant amounts of water in open flow or some cooling towers, and
electricity is consumed by sealed refrigerating systems.

Chapter 1
16 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
1.4.4 Substances of concern

Due the wide range of process activities, the range of substances used and emitted by the
industry is substantial. However, most installations will only use or generate some (and not all)
of these substances [111, ACEA, 2003]. Table 1.4 identifies key substances used and the media
they may affect when emitted. As most substances are used in aqueous solutions, they will be
found in process waste waters as well as in-plant leakages and spills. Very little is known of the
breakdown products in the processes.
Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 17
Principal substances of concern Medium affected
Note: It is unlikely that all substances
will be used or arise in one installation,
as they are process-dependent
Water Soil Air
Other issues to be
considered
Metals: See Annex 8.1
Zinc V V
Copper V V
Nickel V V
Health issues during use and
in products
Chromium V V V
Health issues with aerosols
of Cr(VI) solutions
Lead V V
Cadmium V V V
Pb and Cd are EU priority
pollutants
Non-metals:
Cyanides V V V Toxic
Hypochlorite V V
Concern for formation of
AOX with other substances.
Can release chlorine under
certain conditions
AOX (absorbable organic halogens) V V
May be formed in some
effluent treatments
Peroxides
Oxidising agent: storage
issues
Surfactants:
Dispersing agents, emulsifiers,
detergents, wetting agents (including
nonyl and other alkyl phenyl
ethoxylates (NP/NPEs) brightening
agents (brighteners), PFOS
V
NPE is banned.
Health and environment
issues with PFOS, see Annex
8.2
Complexing agents:
EDTA V
Tartrate, EDDS, NTA, gluconate,
Quadrole
V
Sodium dithionite V Storage issues
Acids and alkalis:
Hydrochloric, nitric, phosphoric,
sulphuric, hydrofluoric, acetic
V V V
Acid fumes, particularly
NO
X
Sodium and potassium hydroxides, lime V V V Dusts
Other ions V V Local environmental issues
Solvents:
Trichloroethylene (TRI) V V V
Tetrachloroethylene (PER) V V V
Trichlorotrifluoroethane (CFC-113) V V V
Methylene chloride V V V
Other legislation
applies to air emissions
Gases:
Chlorine V Used in cyanide treatment
Dusts V V From linishing and polishing
Wastes V V V
Table 1.4: Key substances of concern across the sector and media potentially affected

Process discharge problems with metals, cyanides, surfactants, complexing agents, acids, alkalis
and their salts can be addressed by substituting processes and/or chemicals, and managing
processes and rinsing systems to reduce the amount of chemicals dragged out of the solution on
the substrates being treated. End-of-pipe treatment may also be applied.

Chapter 1
18 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
1.4.4.1 Metals

The main impact of metals is as soluble salts. Metals are conservative materials, that is, they
cannot be created or destroyed: they are neither created nor destroyed in the treatment processes
or in waste water treatment. Their form may be changed and/or managed so they cannot readily
access environmental pathways but their disposal means that the metals still remain in part of
the environment. Options exist for maximising their in-process recovery and recycling as well
as for external recovery. They can also be separated in end-of-pipe systems into sludge. Metals
not removed from the effluent accumulate in sewage sludge or in aquatic ecosytems.
Management routes for municipal waste water treatment sludges vary in all Member States and
are strongly dependent on the acceptability of applying the sludges to agricultural land where
the metal content is a key determining factor.

While all the metals used in surface treatment (including substrates) can have adverse effects,
depending on their speciation, six metals are of most concern for their environmental and/or
health effects: cadmium, lead, nickel, chromium, copper and zinc [114, Belgium, 2003]. A
Commission Decision [2, EC, 2000] implementing an inventory of emissions and sources from
IPPC installations requires the reporting of the quantities emitted above certain thresholds and
the six metals are mentioned in key EU environmental directives, PARCOM (now OPSAR) [12,
PARCOM, 1992] and four are restricted in product-related directives (see Annex 8.1).

Cadmiums toxic properties are well established and it is a priority hazardous substance
according to the Water Framework Directive [93, EC, 2000]. However, it has certain key
properties important in surface treatment (see Section 2.5.5), for applications with high fail-safe
requirements such as aeronautical and aerospace, nuclear, mining, and communications
applications. Its use is therefore restricted to these by the Marketing and Use Directive as
amended [144, EC, 1976]. These controls have been in place for many years and emissions of
cadmium have been considerably reduced from the surface treatment industry.

Hexavalent chromium has adverse health effects, causing skin and mucus membrane irritation
and certain cancers. Aerosols are generated from the electroplating process solution by cathodic
hydrogen evolution (see Section 2.5.3). Workplace health and safety regulations usually require
measures to meet maximum allowable concentrations (MACs). Hexavalent chromium is also
soluble at a wide range of pHs contributing to high aquatic toxicity. Due to its solubility and
chemistry, it must first be reduced to trivalent chromium before precipitation in waste water
treatment plants. Recent Directives [99, EC, 2000, EC, 2003 #98] limit the quantities of
hexavalent chromium (but not the metal) in certain products treated by this industry.

Nickel metal and its salts have adverse health effects: nickel sulphate is currently classed as a
category 3 carcinogen
2
[105, EC, 1967]. Aerosols and airborne particles can arise from
electroplating and autocatalytic (electrocatalytic) as well as plant and solution maintenance
operations. Again, workplace health and safety regulations usually require measures to meet
maximum allowable concentrations (MACs). Nickel and its salts can cause allergic contact
dermatitis and contact can be avoided by using good health and safety at work practices [144,
EC, 1976, CETS, 2003 #115].

Lead is subject to a review for possible identification as a priority hazardous substance. Recent
Directives [99, EC, 2000, EC, 2003 #98] also limit the quantities of lead in certain products
treated by this industry.

2
R40: possible risk of irreversible effects. R42/43; may cause sensitisation by inhalation and skin contact.
Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 19
1.4.4.2 Cyanides

Cyanides are well-known hazardous substances but are still essential in some processes. As well
as their inherent toxicity, cyanides give off cyanide gas in acid conditions. Cyanides can cause
problems in effluent treatment by strongly complexing some metals, such as nickel, and this
interferes with both the easy oxidation of the cyanide and the separation by precipitation of the
metal (see complexing agents, Section 1.4.4.5). There is a PARCOM recommendation for
cyanide to be substituted [12, PARCOM, 1992].

1.4.4.3 Hypochlorite, chlorine and AOX

Hypochlorite and chlorine are used in the oxidation of cyanide in waste water treatment plants.
They are capable of reacting with organic substances to form AOX (absorbable organic
halogens). [104, UBA, 2003] Hypochlorite has been flagged by OSPAR as a candidate
substance for prioritisation for cessation of emission [131, OSPAR, 2002 ongoing]. Chlorine is
the only gas likely to be used in surface treatment installations for the oxidation of cyanide, and
is not widely used. Hypochlorite can release chlorine in certain conditions, such as low pH.

1.4.4.4 Surfactants

Surfactants are widely used in many of the processes, such as in degreasing, in wetting surfaces
and assisting other processes such as etching, and as brighteners by promoting finely divided
metal deposition. Some surfactants have low degradability in aquatic systems, and the by-
products of degradation may have adverse effects. Nonyl phenyl ethoxylate (NPE) is cited as
being used in the industry. [38, Ullmann, 2002/3] For metal working, with effect from
17 January 2005 [115, CETS, 2003], NPE and nonylphenol are OSPAR chemicals for priority
action and are banned except for uses in controlled systems where the washing liquid is
recycled or incinerated [30, EC, 2003]. PFOS (perfluorooctane sulphonate) is widely used as a
foam suppressant and surfactant, especially in preventing the formation of mists in hexavalent
chromium electroplating and alkali non-cyanide/zinc baths. However, it is now under
investigation (see Annex 8.2, [109, DEFRA, 2004]) and the OECD Task Force on existing
chemicals has already agreed that it is persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic.

1.4.4.5 Complexing agents

Complexing agents [73, BSTSA, ] including cyanides and EDTA retain metals as complexes
and preventing the absorption the metal onto sediments or suspended sediments. The soluble
metals may be carried through effluent treatment systems and into sewage and aquatic systems.
EDTA is both a strong complexing agent and has low biodegradability. Excess uncomplexed
EDTA carried into aquatic systems may remobilise metals from sediments with high metals
loads [22, Fraunhofer, 2002].
1.4.4.6 Acids and alkalis

Acids and alkalis are commonly used industrial chemicals and their discharge without
neutralisation may affect sewers or receiving watercourses. Spillage and leakage can also
contaminate soils. When used in hot solutions, the resulting fumes may cause problems in the
workplace or locally when extracted. Hydrochloric acid is the most commonly used acid and its
fumes can also cause corrosion damage inside the installation, affecting equipment controls.
Specific problems occur with nitric acid, as it can release NO
X
when in contact with metals.
This is a local environmental and workplace health issue, as most installations are not
significant NO
X
emitters. Sulphuric acid is widely used, particularly in anodising. However,
concentrations are lower than the level for the emission of fumes.
Chapter 1
20 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
1.4.4.7 Other ions

Chlorides, sulphates, phosphates and other salts are the necessary anions in treatment solutions
and are not usually a problem when discharged to municipal waste water treatment plants.
However, they may occasionally cause salinity problems, and phosphates and nitrates [121,
France, 2003] contribute to eutrophication, especially if discharged directly to surface waters.

1.4.4.8 Solvents

Solvents are used for degreasing incoming components. 1,1,1,-trichloroethane used to be widely
used, but is being phased out under controls as an ozone layer damaging substance. The heavier
solvents trichlorothethylene and tetrachloroethylene can cause problems including accumulation
into, and leakage from, sewerage systems [70, Ellis, 2001]. This can cause health and safety
problems to maintenance workers and pollution problems to groundwater. Non-halogenated
solvents are also used, but have lower environmental impacts. The Solvent Emissions Directive
[97, EC, 1999] controls the use and emission of VOCs and the Reference Document on Surface
Treatments using Solvents (the STS BREF) discusses BAT for solvent-based processes [90,
EIPPCB, ]. Organic solvents also have health and safety effects in use and the degree and type
of control depends on the substance [113, Austria, 2003].

1.4.4.9 Dusts

Dusts are generated from linishing and polishing where these occur as directly related activities.
They are usually a mixture of particles of abrasives with the abraded substrate. They may have
health and safety impacts in the workplace, but can have adverse environmental impacts when
extracted to the outside environment. The collected dusts require disposal as wastes, and may be
hazardous.

1.4.4.10 Wastes

Much of the waste produced from process activities is likely to be classed as hazardous [92, EC,
1991, 100, EC, 2000]. The industry produces in the order of 300000 tonnes of hazardous waste
a year in Europe
3
(approximately 16 tonnes a year per installation). Liquid wastes are spent
process solutions that cannot be treated or discharged, and solid wastes are largely sludges from
waste water treatment plants and treatments of process solutions. Metals may be recovered from
both solid and liquid wastes. Other solid wastes include broken equipment such as jigs (which
may contain recoverable materials), packaging for workpieces as well as used chemicals (see
Section 2.13.2).

1.4.5 Other emissions

1.4.5.1 Noise

Surface treatment is not a major noise emitting industry. However, some activities and
associated activities do generate significant noise. These can be as peaks, such as unloading of
metal components in stillages, or continuous noise from linishing and polishing or fans and
motors sited externally.

3
This derived from an industry estimate of <1 % of hazardous waste in Europe and the Eurostat figures from hazardous waste
management in the EU-15.
Chapter 1
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 21
1.4.5.2 Odour

Again, odour is not a major factor for this industry. However, odour can be associated with
some activities, particularly acid fumes and especially when stripping metal layers. The impact
will depend on the type and size of activity carried out, the design and operation of any
extraction system (e.g. chimney height) and the proximity of receptors, such as housing.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 23
2 APPLIED PROCESSES AND TECHNIQUES

General description of activities

The surface treatments of plastics and metals described in this document are mostly water-based
and the installations carry out activities sequentially, usually in process lines made up of a series
of vats or activities. Figure 2.1 shows a simplified process workflow of a typical process line.
All lines (except some simple iron phosphating lines, see Section 2.5.16) contain more than one
treatment or activity type, usually with rinsing vats in between. Some activities are waterless,
such as drying and, for printed circuit boards, drilling. The size of an individual vat can range
from a few litres for precious metal coating, to 500 m
3
or more for some installations processing
aerospace workpieces. Historically, the surface treatment industry has been characterised by the
large volumes of water used in processing, and these were often visible running across process
area floors: this is no longer usual [124, Germany, 2003] [111, ACEA, 2003].

D
E
G
R
E
A
S
E
R
R
I
N
S
E
A
C
T
I
V
A
T
O
R
R
I
N
S
E
1
st
C
O
A
T
I
N
G
2
nd
C
O
A
T
I
N
G
D
R
I
E
R
R
I
N
S
E
R
I
N
S
E
Load Unload
Workpiece movement
Figure 2.1: A simplified process line workflow diagram

A common feature of surface treatment installations is the large number and complex mix of
processes and activities carried out in an installation, particularly in jobbing shops (as shown in
Figure 2.2), as well as in single purpose installations (see Figure 2.27). Figure 2.7 shows a
section through a typical jig plating process line with multiple processes and activities (note the
activities are not carried out in numeric order because of transporter programming) and Figure
4.33 shows two large scale jig lines in an installation.

The size and complexity of the installation, the core activities and associated activities are
dictated by:

the type of surface treatments to be carried out
the quality standards being worked to
the type, size and amount of workpieces (substrates) to be treated
the transport systems required to handle the workpieces.

These all also impact on the pollution potential from the installation.

Before and after the activities described here, subsequent operations may be performed on the
workpiece or substrate such as pressing, forming, bending, crimping, drilling, welding,
soldering, etc. These subsequent operations, as well as the final use of the treated product, will
be critical factors in determining the specification and type of surface treatment to be applied.

Chapter 2
24 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The manufacture of printed circuit boards is the most complex, and can involve over 40
activities.

DELIVERY
HEATING
BOILER
COOLING SYSTEM
TANK FOR
TREATED EFFLUENT
FOR RECYCLING
WASTE WATER TREATMENT,
RECTIFIERS, CONTROL EQUIPMENT
MANUAL COPPER
& NICKEL PLATING
LINE (5 m
3
)
DE-EMBRITTLEMENT
OVEN
CHEMICAL
STORE
AUTOMATIC
BLACK
ZINC
JIG LINE
(12 m
3
)
AUTOMATIC
ACID ZINC
JIG LINE
(BEAM) (26 m
3
)
AUTOMATIC
BARREL
PHOSPHATING
LINE
(16 m
3
)
OFFICES, LABORATORY AND CHANGING ROOMS
MANUAL
GOLD
PLATING
LINE (0.5 m
3
)
INCOMING
WORKPIECES
STORE
TREATED
WORKPIECES
STORE
Figure 2.2: Example of a jobbing shop layout

Despite this complexity and the range of activities described in this chapter, all workpieces or
substrates pass along a common route of activities, described in Figure 2.3. The first activity on-
site is the delivery and storage (Section 2.1) of incoming workpieces, substrates and raw
materials. Workpieces or components are loaded onto the appropriate transport systems (see
Section 2.2) prior to pretreatment, such as degreasing. Most workpieces or substrates are given
more than one pretreatment (see Section 2.3), and some of these may be prior to loading to a
process line. The workpieces or substrates are then surface treated with one or more of the
activities described in core processes. Rinsing, (see Section 2.4), is usually carried out between
processes steps, whether they are pretreatment and/or core processing steps. Treatment is
followed by after treatments such as drying, (see Section 2.6), and the workpieces or substrates
are stored and dispatched (described in Section 2.1, together with incoming goods).

All the core treatment processes and other activities have historically been developed for jig
lines. Indeed, jig lines still carry out the widest range of activities. The treatments are
therefore described generically for jig lines. Specific issues for barrel and coil processing
and printed circuit boards are described subsequently: barrel processing in Section 2.8, coil
processing for large scale steel coils in Section 2.9, coil and sheet processing for aluminium
lithographic plates in Section 2.10, and printed circuit boards in Section 2.11.
There are also utility inputs - energy and water - to surface treatment installations (described in
Section 3.2), as well as the use of abatement techniques for the treatment of water, waste and air
emissions (see Section 2.13).

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 25
Figure 2.3: Common route in Chapter 2 for workpieces and substrates and the activity descriptions

Electrolytic processes

An electrolytic process needs:

a solution of electrolytes, i.e. capable of carrying a current
at least two electron conductors (electrodes) and the ability to form a circuit
a current usually direct current (DC), although the voltage can be AC or reversing DC
in specific cases.

The electrolytic process requires the electrolyte to complete an electric circuit between the
electrodes. When the electrodes are connected to a source of direct current (DC), one electrode,
the cathode, becomes negatively (Xve) charged while the other, the anode, becomes positively
(+ve) charged. The positive ions (cations) in the electrolyte will move towards the cathode and
the negatively charged ions (anions) toward the anode. This migration of ions through the
electrolyte constitutes the electric current in that part of the circuit. The migration of electrons
into the anode, through the wiring and an electric power supply (supplied by rectifiers), and then
back to the cathode constitutes the current in the external circuit. Electrolysis therefore converts
electrical energy into chemical energy [11, Tempany, 2002, 34, Brett, 2002, 35, Columbia,
2002, 36, IUPAC, 1997].

Chemical energy in electrolytic reactions is associated with changes in the oxidation state in part
of the circuit (in the electrolyte, at the anodes or at the interface) and can be manifested as some
or all of the following:

the dissolution of metal ions into electrolyte
the deposit of metal from the electrolyte
some layer conversion coatings, e.g. anodising, change the oxidation state at the anode
surface (see Section 2.5.13)
the release of gases. In the circuits discussed here, hydrogen and/or oxygen are the
gases usually released.
Chapter 2
26 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Electrolytic cells and reactions

When the workpiece or substrate is connected to the circuit in the electrodeposition cell, the
cations (in the example, M
+
and H
+
) move towards the cathode (ve). The metal is deposited
while hydrogen is generated as a secondary cathodic reaction. The anions (e.g. Cl
-
) move
towards the anode (+ve) [118, ESTAL, 2003, Ireland, 2003 #125].

As a simple example, M is the metal being electroplated, and X is the anion in solution:

M
+
H
+
X
-
Anode Cathode
DC
supply
in acid solution:

anode reaction: 2H
2
O Y4H
+
+ O
2
Z + 4e
-
Electrolysis of water

cathode reaction: M
+
+ e
-
YM[ Reduction to metal

in alkali solution:

anode reaction: 4OH
-
YO
2
Z + 2H
2
O + 4e
-
cathode reaction: M
+
+ e
-
YM[
The choice, design and sizing of the other line components and associated activities are
dependent on the choice of the electrolytic cell and its components. The choice of an electrolytic
cell depends on:

the industrial applications the producer intends to supply
the layer type and thickness required (deposit and/or conversion) and of the throughput
capacity required
the type of substrates (workpieces) to be treated
the transport type required to move them: jig, barrel or coil.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 27
Electrolytic cells may be classified in function by four main parameters:

electrolytic cell geometry
current density
types of electrolyte bath (described for each process, below)
anode types.

Two families of anodes are available:

soluble anodes which have two functions: to provide metal ions to the electrolyte bath
and to repel the positive ions towards the substrate (forming the cathode). The anodes
are consumed during the process and need to be replaced regularly to maintain the
solution strength. They are fixed on a supporting rail which carries the current to them
insoluble anodes have only one function: to repel the positive ions towards the steel
strip (cathode). They are constructed of current carrying materials that do not take part
in the solution reaction. They are used in electrochemical processes where the anode
material does not take part in the process, such as electrolytic degreasing. Where there
is deposition of material, process solution strength is maintained by additions as make-
up, often from a separate feed tank, e.g. a zinc dissolution tank.

2.1 Delivery and storage workpieces and consumable raw
materials

2.1.1 Incoming workpiece and/or substrates to be treated

The workpiece and/or substrates to be treated are delivered in different ways according to size,
substrate material, quality and cost, and whether they are intended for in-house treatment or for
external shipment to another site or a subcontractor. Jig treatment is most costly, and
workpieces may be packed in bulk in stillages for cheaper steel components but are more
carefully packaged for more valuable workpieces: from layering in stillages with protective
inter-layers (to protect against physical damage and/or corrosion) to high value components
such as aluminium alloy aircraft wing sections being individually packed in robust boxes.
Automotive bodies are moved individually before and into processes on large jigs (or sleds) see
Figure 2.4 [111, ACEA, 2003]. Handling of workpieces can be mechanical or manual. Barrel
plating tends to be cheaper, where the quality of the finish is less critical and substrate is robust,
and here workpieces are usually transported loose in stillages and often emptied mechanically.
For coils, the external initial layers protect the rest of the coil. While small coils (in reel-to-reel
processing) can be moved by hand, large scale coils (because of their weight) need specialist
equipment, such as air flotation rafts and overhead cranes.

Environmental considerations
The amount and type of packing used and the minimisation of loss of materials by damage to
workpieces or substrate.
Chapter 2
28 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 2.4: Automotive body undergoing spray pre-treatment
[ACEA]

2.1.2 Consumable raw materials

Raw material inputs will vary according to the installation and will depend on the chemistry the
various processes carried out and the workpiece or substrate condition, shapes and surface area
throughput. Larger sites will receive some liquid chemicals in bulk by tanker, most IPPC sites
will receive at least some chemicals in IBC (Intermediate Bulk Containers) and all will receive
liquids in sizes from 2.5 to 210 litre containers. Bulk liquid storage is in bulk tanks or in IBC
containers, with smaller quantities being stored as delivered and used from the delivery
containers.

Large scale solids deliveries may be by bulk tanker, but are more usually in the form of big
bags. Most commonly, 25 kg sacks, bags, drums and other containers including disposable
packaging, are used for powders, pellets and flakes. Storage of bulk solids may be in silos.
Other solids are stored in the containers they are delivered in. [111, ACEA, 2003].

Metals for deposition are usually delivered as anode bars or anode balls, or as salts (see solids,
above) but may be in proprietary solutions for chemical treatments (including autocatalytic
processes) or precious metal plating.

Smaller quantities of chemicals are used in laboratories and for replenishing costly ingredients,
such as in gold solutions or some trace components of process solutions.

The largest amount of chemicals in an installation are usually stored in use in the process line
vats and the containment of these chemicals, the use of chemicals in maintaining the solutions
and leakage issues are analogous to those for the incoming raw materials.

A description of the storage and handling of chemicals is given in the reference document on
BAT for emissions from storage [23, EIPPCB, 2002].

Environmental considerations
Prevention of unplanned releases to surface and groundwaters, and soils.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 29
2.2 Handling techniques for processing and loading for
processing

When workpieces are in a suitable state for the core treatments, they are loaded for processing
using one of the three transport types described below: [104, UBA, 2003]

jigs or racks frames carrying the workpieces singly or in groups
barrels plastic cylinders holding many workpieces
coil coils or reels of substrate working on a continuous basis.

In a limited number of cases, components are treated in situ (see brush electroplating and
anodising, below).

Jigs or racks
Jigs (also known as racks or frames) provide both physical support for handling during
processing, as well as electrical contact when needed in electrolytic processing. Jigs may be
used for all sizes of components from small, such as jewellery and small precision engineered
components, to large installations handling parts of aircraft and automotive bodies (see Figure
2.4). Small components are secured by hand on jigs, either by being clipped onto spring
retainers forming part of the jig or fixed using copper wire: both systems carry the current in
electrolytic processes. Jigs are hung on flight bars: these assemblies are used both to move the
jigs through the core process steps and (where the processes depends on electrical current) to
carry the electrical current to the jig [128, Portugal, 2003]. Where current is carried, the flight
bars need to make good electrical contact: for example, the jigs are hung in each process vat
from copper U- or V-shaped cradles. For very large components, the jig may be a large platform
or frame without a separate flight bar, and electrical connectors are attached to the jig where
necessary.

Figure 2.5 shows finished gold plated components being unloaded from jigs with spring
retainers, visually inspected and packed in specialised plastic trays. There are two jigs
suspended from a flight bar.

Flight bars can be moved by two types of mechanism:

transporters, which are hoists travelling on rails running the length of the process line.
This is the most flexible type of system and can be programmed for various finish
options, with different dwell times in different vats, or operated manually
beams, where the flight bars are hung on a beam. The beam moves up and down at
present intervals. In the up position, the flight bars are moved to the next process vat
position. However, the only way of varying the process time in different vats is to
change the tank length.

In process lines with low throughput, or small components, jigs may also be moved by hand.
Large, individual components, such as aircraft parts or automotive bodies may be moved on
conveyor systems or by overhead transporters.

Chapter 2
30 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 2.5: Jig or rack plating: unloading finished components
Graingorge S.A., France and Agence de leau Seine-Normandie

Barrels
Barrel lines tend to be used for high volume, lower cost work such as nuts and bolts, and can
only achieve lower quality finishes than jigs. Barrels are usually hexagonal or octagonal plastic
drums, with many holes in the long panels allowing access for the process liquids. The barrels
are usually moved by transporter systems, although for very small components (such as contact
pins being gold plated) small barrel units can be moved by hand. They are loaded from stillages
of components. Usually workpieces are emptied from stillages onto the floor, and the barrels are
then loaded manually using a shovel. Large scale barrel operations may use a mechanical loader
or a mechanised system. The barrel hangs from cradles which carry current at the appropriate
process vats. The barrel spindle carries current to a flexible electrode which trails in the barrel
from the central spindle and carries current to the loaded components in the relevant process
vats. The barrel is constantly rotated usually via a drive mechanism on the side. The current is
then passed through a flexible inert anode which trails in the rotating barrel and current is
passed through the contacting workpieces.

Steel coils
Coils can be up to 32 tonne rolls of steel up to 2080 mm wide [119, Eurofer, 2003]. Coils are
loaded in an entry loader section and welded onto the end of the preceding coil, see Section 2.9.

Aluminium coils
Aluminium coils up to about 25 tonnes, up to 2200 mm wide and up to about 3 mm thick are
processed [118, ESTAL, 2003].

Printed circuit boards
The transport of boards can vary during production, they are moved both as individual boards
across rollers in some parts of the process lines and in other parts they are moved in sets on jigs.

Brush electroplating and anodising
This is a specialised technique, developed for selective plating using portable equipment and
anodes surrounded by absorbent material that do not require immersion of the part. The method
is not generally used for production, but repair of worn or defective parts, e.g. large printing
rollers, large bearings, military and aviation parts, statues and other parts too large to process by
immersion techniques. [38, Ullmann, 2002/3]

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 31
2.3 Workpiece or substrate pretreatment

Workpieces or substrates to be surface treated must be clean from dust, swarf and moulding
flash, as well as being corrosion- and grease-free to ensure uniform application and permanent
adhesion of the surface treatment. Many workpieces or substrates are oiled to prevent corrosion
in transit or from a previous operation such as pressing. Usually (but not necessarily) the
workpieces will need to be totally smooth to produce a high quality treated finish. Some
preparation of the workpieces may be carried out at the site producing them, but these activities
are also carried out at the surface treatment installation [6, IHOBE, 1997].
Activities preparing steel coil and wires prior to surface treatment in coil coating process lines
are described in the BREF on the ferrous metals processing industry [86, EIPPCB, ].

While virtually all process lines include cleaning or degreasing, where components are heavily
oiled or surface preparation is critical, it may be necessary to supplement this by an additional
pre-degreasing step. [104, UBA, 2003]

The pretreatment steps not only remove greases and oil, but also remove oxides and provide
chemically active surfaces for the subsequent treatment [73, BSTSA, ].

Overall environmental considerations
If cleaning is a separate activity to the main processing, the increased handling (such as
emptying containers, etc.) may give rise to additional noise [73, BSTSA, ].

2.3.1 Mechanical pretreatment

2.3.1.1 Linishing and polishing

Mechanical polishing produces a flowed amorphous surface under the influence of pressure and
high local temperatures [121, France, 2003, Finland, 2003 #120]. Individual components are
linished using abrasive belts, and then polished with an abrasive paste applied on fabric mops,
which removes fine marks and gives a highly polished finish. These activities are carried out
less frequently as modern production techniques produce better engineered components than in
the past, or use alternative materials such as plastics which can be precision moulded. Where
large numbers of workpieces are handled, the linishing and polishing are usually automated.

Figure 2.6: Linishing
Producmetal S.A., France and Agence de leau Seine-Normandie

Environmental considerations
Noise and dust are associated with this activity.

Wastes may be hazardous depending on the substrate.

Chapter 2
32 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.3.1.2 Abrasive blasting

This traditionally uses sand or grit, but may use softer, finer abrasives such as ground nut shells.
These techniques may be used to de-stress the surface of the workpieces.

Environmental considerations
Noise and dust are associated with this activity.

Abrasive blasting creates solid wastes. With non-ferrous metals, the wastes (a mixture of
abrasives and abraded material from the metals) may be hazardous [113, Austria, 2003].

2.3.1.3 Deburring and/or tumbling

Applied to smaller, mass-produced components often followed by barrel treatment. The
workpieces are mixed with abrasive stones and tumbled or vibrated for up to several hours [73,
BSTSA, ]. These techniques can also be used in aqueous media with chemical additives to
clean, deburr and pickle the parts.

Environmental considerations
Noise and dust are associated with this activity.

Wastes generated directly may be contaminated with oils, surfactants and abrasive particles,
particularly vibratory finishing [73, BSTSA, ].
Where used with an aqueous system, the effluent may require specific treatment to eliminate
metals in solution and COD. This effluent is often recycled after centrifugation, simple filtration
or ultrafiltration. The residues from treatment may be treated off-site in a suitable waste
treatment plant or on-site in a physico-chemical waste water treatment plant. The residues may
be hazardous waste [121, France, 2003].

2.3.2 Electrolytic and chemical polishing

As well as the mechanical methods, electrolytic and chemical processes are employed in the
production of smooth, bright surfaces. Although their function in industry is similar, the
principle by which polishing is carried out is very different. While mechanical polishing
produces a flowed amorphous surface under the influence of pressure and high local
temperatures, chemical and electrolytic polishing are selective dissolution processes where the
high points of the rough surface are dissolved faster than the depressions. The potential
advantages of these methods are [118, ESTAL, 2003, Finland, 2003 #120, P G Sheasby, 2002
#132]:

being similar in operation to anodising and electroplating processes, they can be
employed together in a single production line, with considerable reduction in plant and
simplified control, while mechanical polishing may often be replaced entirely
they are suitable for bulk treatment and labour costs are appreciably lower, particularly
on components not suited to automatic polishing machines
the surface is clean and gives better subsequent deposit adhesion as well as high
corrosion resistance
the reflectivity and colour are often superior and there is no tendency to bloom.

Overall environmental considerations
Some of the chemicals used in electropolishing are toxic and this should be taken into account
both in the workplace and when disposing of spent baths. For chromium compounds, see
Sections 1.4.4.1 for health effects, and Section 2.5.3 for overall environmental considerations.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 33
Spent electrolytes and acids have a low pH and high concentration of dissolved metals including
chromium and nickel and may need to be treated before disposal as effluent (see Section
4.16.2). Alternatively, spent electrolytes may be managed as hazardous wastes. Electrolytes for
stainless steels deteriorate due to excessive iron in solution [73, BSTSA, ].

Rinsing waters may also require treatment for the same reasons.

Acid fumes, particularly those containing hexavalent chromium, may need extraction and
treatment. Where nitric acid is used, an air-scrubber may be used to remove nitrogen oxides
(NO
X
).

There is no associated dust and noise, unlike mechanical polishing processes.

2.3.2.1 Electropolishing

Electropolishing is a commonly used electrochemical method for smoothing, polishing,
deburring and cleaning various metals, generally steel, stainless steel, copper and its alloys and
aluminium and its aluminium alloys. It is widely used in food equipment, surgical equipment
and implants, the pharmaceutical, paper, pulp and food industries, as well as in automotive and
architectural applications. Electropolishing removes a fine surface layer electrolytically, and is
often used in cases where very smooth and bright finishes are needed. In electropolishing, the
workpiece (anode) is immersed in electrolyte and electric current (usually DC) is connected
between the workpiece and the cathode. The workpiece becomes polarised and metal ions start
to diffuse to the cathode, and metal is removed from the anode. The reaction can be controlled
by adjusting bath and process parameters and by choosing the metal or alloy being
electropolished.

In these electropolishing processes, different electrolytes are used. Electrolytes are usually
mixtures of various acids (sulphuric acid, chromic acid, citric acid, and/or phosphoric acid) and
sometimes organic compounds (such as glycerine or diethyleneglycolmonobutylether) are
added. [133, Hensel, 2002, 134, CEN/BSI, 1997, 135, Swain, 1996, 136, Webber and Nathan,
2000], [137, ISO/BSI, 2000]

Environmental and other considerations
During electropolishing of stainless steels, hydrogen is formed, which mixes with oxygen at the
solution surface. If ignited by a spark, this can produce an explosion. It is therefore advisable to
extract gases forming on top of the solution. This is vital when processing the internal surfaces
of enclosed vessels, otherwise a serious, possibly fatal, injury may occur. Repeated noise of this
type may have an impact beyond the perimeter of the installation (as well as being an
occupational health issue).

2.3.2.2 Electropolishing with electric discharge (also known as plasma-
electrolytic polishing)

Plasma-electrolytic polishing is an alternative method for some applications. The process differs
from conventional electropolishing mostly because of its electrolytes and process parameters
used. Instead of mixed acids, these electrolytes are different salt solutions and far more friendly
for employees and for environment. In this process, the used electric potential between anode
and cathode is in the range of 200 400 V DC depending on the solution and temperature (40
95 C) used.

The same process can be used also for plasma-electrolytic oxidation in order to get hard oxide-
ceramic coatings.

Chapter 2
34 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.3.2.3 Electrolytic and chemical polishing processes for aluminium

Industrial electrolytic and chemical polishing processes for aluminium are of two types:

processes designed to replace or reduce mechanical polishing. These provide a smooth,
bright, though not a mirror, finish, and are characterised by high dissolution rates
(between 2.5 and 5.0 ]m per minute). In most cases, the best results are obtained on
high purity aluminium or its alloys, but some processes may be employed on
commercial purity based grades of aluminium, producing a correspondingly lower
grade of finish

processes employed after mechanical polishing. These processes have a low rate of
attack and are employed on aluminium reflectors and other components which require a
higher specular reflectivity than is obtained by mechanical methods alone. Their use is
generally restricted to high purity based materials as reflectivity falls off sharply as the
quantity of second-phase constituents present increases.

Hot, highly concentrated acid mixtures are normally used, especially phosphoric acid, sulphuric
acid and sometimes nitric acid. The temperature is >80 C.

2.3.3 Solvent degreasing

Solvent degreasing is usually by means of chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHC), alcohols, terpenes,
ketones, mineral spirits or hydrocarbons [90, EIPPCB, , 104, UBA, 2003], [73, BSTSA, ].
CHCs are used because of their good cleaning efficiency and universal applicability, as well as
their quick drying and incombustibility, but their use is restricted by environmental and health
legislation. All solvents affect the central nervous system and exposure should be controlled
(see environmental considerations, below) [73, BSTSA, , 90, EIPPCB, ].

There are two types of process:

cold cleaning: The workpieces and/or substrates are immersed in the solvent or cleaned
in a stream of solvent. In some cases, the solvent is pumped round taking the liquid
from near the top of a holding tank, leaving dirt to settle at the bottom. The tank is
cleaned periodically
vapour phase: The solvent is vaporised in a purpose-built bath and the cold component
suspended in the vapour. The vapour condenses on the component dissolving grease
and drained off with the dirt and grease, leaving the component clean and dry. The most
common solvents are CHCs. As the vapours are heavier than air they are contained in
the bath. Hydrocarbon solvent may be used.

The choice of solvents will depend on a number of factors including the substrate to be cleaned,
the type of oil or grease to be removed, the previous manufacturing process and the
requirements of the subsequent surface treatments. Chlorinated ethanes and ethylenes attack
aluminium and should not be brought into contact with substrate, tanks, containers, valves, etc.
made of aluminium. Dichloroethylenes in contact with copper should be avoided under all
circumstances as explosive acetylides may be formed.

Chlorinated solvents have no flashpoints [73, BSTSA, ]. Ketones and mineral spirits may be
used, but are flammable. Higher hydrocarbons with a narrow distillation range give the highest
flashpoints commensurate with solvent drying from the workpieces and/or substrate.

Environmental considerations
Because of the classification of certain CHCs as potentially carcinogenic materials, their water-
endangering potential and problems with emissions to the air, their use is strongly regulated
[[93, EC, 2000, 97, EC, 1999]. Most other solvents are either inflammable or not self-drying
[73, BSTSA, ]

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 35
2.3.4 Aqueous cleaning

The workpieces are placed in this process solution for several minutes, or placed in a spray bath.
The solution is usually alkaline or neutral but may be acidic and usually working at increased
temperatures (40 90 C) because of the improved cleaning effect. The main components of the
aqueous cleaning system are alkalis or acids, silicates, phosphates and complexing and wetting
agents. Aqueous cleaning systems work either by forming unstable emulsions (known as weak
emulsion systems) or stable emulsions. [3, CETS, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003]

Aqueous chemical systems avoid the use of solvents. The cleaned items can remain wet if the
subsequent treatment is water-based, such as electroplating. Process solutions have a short life,
dependent on throughput and the amount of oil or grease on the workpieces. The efficiency of
aqueous cleaning systems depends on the type and concentration of chemicals, the mechanical
effect, the temperature and the time. The mechanical effect can be applied by spray pressure or
flowrate, agitation of parts or solution, or by using ultrasonics.

Hot water is used effectively to remove oil and grease, especially from steel panels. It is widely
used in the automotive industry.

Strong alkalis and silicates are not suitable for aluminium. Complexing agents (tensides) are not
used in aluminium cleaners. For wetting agents, only very specific agents can be applied (for
instance, non-anionic agents). Cleaning at a low temperature is possible, from 40 upwards
[160, ESTAL, 2004]

Environmental considerations
Energy usage: process tanks operate at 50 90 C and may require fume extraction to remove
water vapour and alkaline or acid fumes.

Rinse-waters (including those from air scrubber units) may require simple pH treatment in
waste water treatment plants.

Metals can be stripped from the substrate surface (including trace elements such as lead which
may have toxic effects). They can be separated after pH adjustment.

Alkaline degreasing agents may contain small amounts of substances of concern, such as nonyl
phenols [161, Assogalvanica, 2004].

Used acid or alkali solutions are often treated separately as they create a large pH change which
may not be accommodated by continuous flow waste water treatment plants.

Solution maintenance by replacing consumed components and removing the accumulated oil
dirt, oil and grease can greatly increase the solution life by various options [73, BSTSA, ].

Cleaning solutions may need to be separated from other process effluents to avoid interference
with the waste water treatment plant by excess surfactants. Cleaning solutions containing
complexing agents should be separated from other waste water streams containing metal ions
[73, BSTSA, ], see Section 4.16.2.

Chapter 2
36 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.3.5 Other cleaning techniques

2.3.5.1 Air knives

Air knives can be used to remove excess oil and grease from parts [73, BSTSA, ]. They are low
pressure, high volume systems where air is emitted through precision slits, giving a laminar air
curtain, through which components can be passed, either manually or on a conveyor belt. The
air heats up due to compression and movement in the system, and this warms oils and greases,
assisting their removal. Both the laminar air movement and the temperature also facilitate
drying of components.

2.3.5.2 Centrifuges

Centrifuges are used on a batch basis to remove excess grease, and usually applied to smaller
workpieces prior to barrel treatment.

2.3.5.3 Dry ice

Blasting with pellets of dry ice by a process called Cryoclean can be used to remove oil and
grease as well as particles, paint, etc. The cleaning effect comes from cooling and cracking of
contaminant layers, mechanical impact and lifting by the gas formed from sublimation of the
dry ice. [115, CETS, 2003, 116, Czech-Republic, 2003]

Pellets are made from liquid CO
2
with a diameter of 3 mm and length of 8 mm at a temperature
of -78 C. They are accelerated by air to a velocity of 100 to 300 m/s. The pellets release kinetic
energy at the surface. On impact, they sublimate immediately. The surface is locally cooled and
due to different thermal expansion coefficients of the substrate and any coating and/or
contaminants, the cleaning ability is increased.

After use, the pellets of dry ice evaporate so the only waste formed is the solid waste of the
stripped coatings. This method is used mainly for cleaning pressing forms and other special
parts. In special cases, it is used to strip coatings (organic and metallic).

Environmental considerations
The method is noisy, and requires protection of workers. The waste may contain toxic
compounds (such as paints with heavy metals, lead, cadmium, etc.). Workers must protect eyes
and respiration. Air extraction and filtration may be necessary.

2.3.5.4 Hand wiping

Hand wiping uses a clean cloth and solvent, or an absorbent such as ground chalk or limestone.
This is carried out on large, high value workpieces such as aerospace components. It is also
used for small, quality critical components [73, BSTSA, ].

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 37
2.3.6 Pickling, descaling and desmutting

Pickling and descaling are chemical metal-stripping procedures used to brighten and/or remove
oxides from the degreased metallic surface prior to other surface treatment processes [73,
BSTSA, ]. The bulk pickling of steels is described in the BREF on ferrous metals processing
[86, EIPPCB, ]. During the pickling processes disturbed or adhering layers, such as scale, oxide
films and other corrosion products of the metal, are removed by chemical reaction with an acid-
based pickling agent. In order to remove strong oxide layers effectively, specified acid
concentrations, temperature and pickling times must be adhered to. Hydrochloric or sulphuric
acids are normally used. In special cases nitric, hydrofluoric or phosphoric acid, or mixtures of
acids are used. Solutions containing fluorides are necessary for reliably pickling certain alloys.
The typical pickling reaction is described by the following chemical equation:

metal oxide + pickling solution metal ion + water

Some erosion of the metallic surface is desirable, but excessive attack of the acid on the basic
material is unwanted. Hydrogen is usually formed:

metal + pickling solution metal ion + hydrogen

The attack can be reduced by using so-called pickling inhibitors. These also cause an inhibition
of hydrogen development, thus minimising so-called hydrogen (or pickling) embrittlement (or
brittleness), caused by entrapment of hydrogen in the metal crystalline structure at the surface
and diffusion of hydrogen to stress concentration sites in the material. This may cause
catastrophic failures in high strength steels [73, BSTSA, ].

The concentration of the ions of the dissolved metal increase in the pickling solution while the
strength of the free acid declines. The acid consumption associated with the dissolution of metal
and metal oxide can be supplemented by adding fresh pickling solution [73, BSTSA, ].
However, this technique is limited by the constantly increasing metal content. A maximum iron
content of 8 % is recommended for sulphuric acid, 12 % for hydrochloric acid and 2.5 % for
phosphoric acid. When the limiting concentrations are reached, the pickling solution must be
disposed of completely or partly. [104, UBA, 2003]

The workpieces to be pickled must be completely grease-free, otherwise uneven pickling will
occur as the acid attacks grease-free areas only. The use of wetting agents accelerates the
pickling procedures as the workpieces are wetted better and more quickly. Iron materials can be
de-rusted and descaled in so-called acid degreasing agents without prior degreasing. The
commercial acid degreasing agents contain mixtures of wetting agents and emulsifying agents,
which can support the emulsification of fats and oils in strong acid media.

The pickling time is reduced with increasing acid concentration and temperature. A maximum
pickling effect is reached with a sulphuric acid concentration of 25 %. Above this, the pickling
speeds decrease. The optimal temperature is at 60 C.

The pickling effects can also be accelerated by movement of the workpieces in the pickling
solution or movement of the pickling solution by solution injection [159, TWG, 2004].

Hydrochloric acid is also good for descaling and pickling. It works rapidly in most cases, with a
concentration of 18 22 %. However, its disadvantage is aggressive vapours. Heating up to
30 35 C not only increases the pickling effect, but also the formation of hydrochloric acid air
emissions.

Hydrofluoric acid is nearly exclusively used for the pickling of cast iron, for example engine
blocks. A concentration of 20 25 % (as HF) and temperatures of 35 - 40 C are generally
preferred.

Chapter 2
38 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
For aluminium, the process is called desmutting, and nitric acid is at concentrations below 150
g/l

Environmental issues
Process tanks may need to be equipped with fume extraction to remove generated aerosols and
hydrochloric acid gas and nitrous oxides if nitric acid is used.

Spent pickling solutions require either treatment and disposal through an effluent treatment
system or disposal as liquid wastes. Excessive attack of the metal surface removes a significant
amount of iron, which can have adverse effects on the waste water treatment systems, such as
significantly increased sludge production [158, Portugal, 2004].

Effluents can easily be treated in typical waste water plants.

Maintenance of pickling electrolytes by acid retardation and diffusion dialysis is used in
Germany in some cases, such as anodising; it is not widely used in electroplating [124,
Germany, 2003].

2.3.7 Etching and descaling of aluminium

Descaling and pickling are not normally applied to aluminium processing because the natural
oxide on aluminium is very thin, unlike that on steel. Aluminium oxide removal may not be
necessary as part of a pretreatment but as a consequence[118, ESTAL, 2003].

The etching of aluminium and its alloys is usually carried out in sodium hydroxide solutions,
fluorides being added as necessary. Zincate treatment is necessary for good adhesion prior to
autocatalytic or electrolytic metal plating. This solution is based on sodium hydroxide
containing <20 g/l zincates.

2.3.8 Electrolytically assisted pickling, activation and degreasing

Pickling can be enhanced by making the substrate anodic. The non-electrolytic pickling of
metals is often followed by electrolytic activation to remove the remains of unwanted residues
from the surface, such as oil and dirt, which remain trapped in the micro-roughness of the
substrate surface. These are removed by the formation by electrolysis of H
2
at the surface of the
cathode and O
2
gas at the surface of the anode [73, BSTSA, ]. The basic composition of the
solution is similar to alkaline degreasers, although the chemical concentration is generally twice
as high. Wetting agents are omitted to prevent foaming; however, cyanides or other complexing
agents may be added to improve the activation of steel items. For normal applications, cyanide-
and chelating-agent free electrolytes are sufficient. The solution lifetime is mainly determined
by dilution through drag-in of rinse-water and drag-out of process solution. [3, CETS, 2002].
This process is not used in anodising [159, TWG, 2004].

Environmental considerations
Process tanks may be equipped with fume extraction to capture vigorously generated aerosols.

Rinse baths are rapidly saturated with dirt, fats and oils.
Rinse effluents and used solutions can be treated as alkaline or cyanide solutions in waste water
treatment plants. The waste water can upset the waste water installation because of the amount
of oils and grease, and the composition and concentration of components, e.g. phosphates and
surface active agents which can interfere with settlement processes [20, VITO, 1998].

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 39
2.3.9 Metal stripping

Metal stripping is necessary for the processing of defectively electroplated components without
losing the properties of the base material [73, BSTSA, ]. It may also be used [73, BSTSA, ] for
the new treatment of nascent workpieces. It may be also used for the recovery of expensive
metals (such as the precious metals), both from the base metals and the coating materials. Often
scrap iron substrate metal can only be regenerated if certain metal coatings which cause
problems are removed. The metal stripping of jigs and/or of jig contacts used in the
electroplating process extends the life of the jigs and recovers the metal deposited.

To preserve the form of the surface to be stripped, the metal stripping techniques should remove
the coating material quickly and safely and not attack the base metal. In exceptional cases, [73,
BSTSA, ] electrolytic activation of the coat can be necessary, for example with chemical
chrome stripping. Chemical procedures are simple in application and they require less
expenditure on plant equipment. On the other hand, electrolytic procedures usually work more
quickly, more economically and with more control. They are therefore preferable for activities
such as the metal stripping of rack contacts.
Environmental considerations
The use of strong acids can generate spillage capable of attacking concrete floors and
subsequently polluting the soil and any groundwater beneath with acid and the dissolved metals.
The disposal of used acid stripping solutions may exceed the treatment capacity of effluent
systems. Acid fumes and mists are caused by reaction with the metals and substrate. These can
cause local air problems, health effects in staff and deterioration of equipment in the installation.

Stripping of previous treatments is often carried out as a batch process outside of the normal
process controls of an installation. They are a potentially significant source of breach of permit
conditions and pollution from the industry.

There can be increased waste production (in sludges from treatment and used acids), as well as
wasted energy, water and raw materials where defective components are stripped for reworking.

2.3.10 Pretreatment of plastics (etching)

Pretreatment is essential in the surface treatment of plastics by autocatalytic plating (see Section
2.5.8) and printed circuit boards (see Section 2.11).

2.3.10.1 Conditioning of plastics

This provides wetability of the surface as a prerequisite for subsequent voidless covering and
good adhesion of metal layers [3, CETS, 2002, 77, BSTSA, ].

The process solution contains sulphuric acid (<20 % by volume) or sodium hydroxide and
carbonate (<10 % by volume), water soluble organic biodegradable solvents (alcohol, glycol
derivatives).

For PCB boards, cleaning using a mix of pumice and water may be used to provide a micro-
rough surface for the subsequent adherence of layers [125, Ireland, 2003].

Environmental considerations
Acid effluents may require pH adjustment in waste water treatment plants.

Chapter 2
40 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.3.10.2 Etching or pickling of plastic

The pickling of plastic is a prerequisite for good metal adhesion. It is carried out in an aqueous
mixture of chromic acid (up to 380 g/l) [73, BSTSA, ] sulphuric acid (380 g/l) and wetting
agent. It is applied to ABS-type plastic surfaces to oxidise and dissolve the butadiene
component, thus generating a micro-rough surface [3, CETS, 2002].
Environmental considerations
Process tanks may be equipped with fume extraction to remove small amounts of generated
aerosols and acid gases.

The solution lifetime can be extended by membrane electrolysis to oxidise Cr(III) to Cr(VI).

Effluents can easily be treated in a similar manner to other solutions containing hexavalent
chromium in waste water treatment plants.

2.4 Drag-out and rinsing

Drag-out is the liquid from the previous process which adheres to the workpiece or substrate
surfaces. Rinsing is necessary:

between most process steps to prevent cross-contamination of process solutions
to ensure there is no deterioration of the workpiece and/or substrate surface by residual
chemicals, such as by over-reaction or by staining by the drying of dissolved chemicals.

A reduction of drag-out is a primary measure for minimising losses of chemicals, operating
costs and environmental problems in rinse-waters. In some processes, such as etching in
anodising, a certain amount of drag-out is used to maintain the solution by preventing the build-
up of by-products, such as in aluminium etching [159, TWG, 2004].

Rinsing is therefore a common activity carried out after nearly all process steps in surface
treatment [3, CETS, 2002]. Figure 2.7 shows a section through a typical jig plating line with six
rinsing stations [65, Atotech, 2001].

Rinse-water may vary in quality depending on the process requirements (see Section 2.12.2).
Many rinsing techniques have been developed to reduce water consumption to a minimum, and
some of these are discussed in Sections 4.6 and 4.7. There is usually a balance to be sought
between achieving the requisite cleanliness of the surface, the quality and quantity of the water
used, and the way rinsing is carried out.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 41
Figure 2.7: Section through a jig plating process line for PCB production
(Atotech Deutschland GmbH)

Environmental considerations
Rinsing is one of the largest potential sources of waterborne contamination as rinse-waters carry
all the process chemicals from an activity. In many cases rinse-waters are treated prior to
discharge (treatment options are discussed in Section 4.16. Key issues are:

minimisation of the loss of materials, including possible re-use of rinse-water
metals: these are conservative, i.e. can only be treated and moved to another waste
stream, but cannot be destroyed
cyanides: these are usually treated by oxidation
complexing agents: (including cyanides) these may need to be treated separately to
enable metals to be successfully treated subsequently
surfactants, brighteners and other additives may interfere in waste water treatment or
have their own environmental impacts
other cations may have local water quality effects.

Rinsing is also one of the two largest water usages in installations (the other large use is
cooling).

2.5 Core activities

2.5.1 Copper and copper alloy plating

[3, CETS, 2002] Copper plating is common for items in daily use, such as coins, and buttons or
zip fasteners with a patina for haberdashery. These types of workpieces can be plated on jigs or
in barrels. Copper plating is also essential in printed circuit board manufacture, see Section
2.11.

Chapter 2
42 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.5.1.1 Cyanide copper

Cyanide copper low temperature electrolytes are necessary for strike plating on steel and zinc
die casts to prevent spontaneous cementation of copper and poor adhesion of the subsequent
metal deposit. This type of solution is based on copper cyanide and sodium cyanide, with a
copper concentration of 15 20 g/l. Copper strike layers are usually no thicker than 2 - 3 ]m.

Thicker layers (6 - 8 ]m) are achieved with potassium cyanide and potassium hydroxide based
high performance electrolytes at a metal content of 25 50 g/l, mainly for barrel plating and
others.

Another high performance electrolyte is based on copper cyanide and sodium cyanide with
potassium sodium tartrate providing higher current densities system, enhanced brightness of
layers and reduces the tendency to anode passivation. The metal content is 40 60 g/l.

Potassium carbonate is generated in potassium-based systems during processing. This disrupts
bright copper deposition and causes roughness at concentrations beyond 90 g/l.

Environmental considerations
Process tanks may be equipped with fume extraction to remove generated aerosols.

Sodium-based solutions can be regenerated by batch or continuous precipitation of sodium
carbonate.

Potassium-based electrolytes have to be discarded as soon as the content of potassium carbonate
exceeds 90 g/l.

Effluent can be treated in typical waste water plants, with a cyanide oxidation stage.

2.5.1.2 Acid copper

These solutions are now the usual choice for copper plating [124, Germany, 2003]. Due to their
excellent levelling capability, acid copper electrolytes based on copper sulphate and sulphuric
acid are used to make polishing and buffing redundant prior to decorative bright nickel and
copper plating on furniture frames, bathroom fittings, wire work, etc. The normal copper
content is 50 60 g/l and sulphuric acid is 60 90 g/l.

An important technical application of acid copper electrolytes is for through-hole, panel and
pattern plating of printed circuit boards and multilayers. Sulphuric acid enhances the
conductivity, the macro-throwing power and provides fine crystalline and ductile layers. In such
electrolytes, the concentration of sulphuric acid is in the range of 180 200 g/l and the copper
concentration is 20 g/l.

The solutions are also cyanide free, do not suffer from carbonate build-up and are more
electrolytically efficient.

Environmental considerations
Process tanks may need to be equipped with fume extraction to remove aerosols generated by
air agitation of the plating solution.

Effluents can be treated in typical waste water plants for low pH and to remove copper.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 43
2.5.1.3 Pyrophosphate copper

Pyrophosphate copper electrolytes no longer play an important role. They are based on copper
pyrophosphate (110 g/l) and potassium pyrophosphate (400 g/l). Additives are citric acid
(10 g/l) and ammonia (3 g/l) [124, Germany, 2003].

They are used for special technical applications such as shielding on heat treated parts, as a
drawing aid for wires, and for other thick bright layers that need little or no polishing, to prevent
hydrogen embrittlement and as an intermediate layer below nickel and silver.

Pyrophosphate electrolytes can also be used for through-hole and panel plating of printed circuit
boards and multi layers, but are currently substituted mainly by acid copper electrolytes.

Pyrophosphate is continuously decomposed by hydrolysis if pH is not maintained sufficiently,
shortening the lifetime of the process solution. Appropriate regeneration means are not currently
available. However, properly maintained baths can last more than 10 years [129, Spain, 2003].
Environmental considerations
Fume extraction is normally used at process tanks.

Effluents have to be treated with lime, as sodium or potassium hydroxides do not precipitate
copper from the pyrophosphate.

Due to the ammonia content, separate treatment from other effluents containing metals is
required.

2.5.1.4 Brass

Brass is predominantly an alloy of copper and zinc although nickel, tin, or lead may be added. A
mixture of copper and zinc cyanides in solution are widely used to deposit copper and zinc
alloys for decorative purposes. They are alkaline electrolytes containing between 8 15 g/l
copper and 5 30 g/l zinc (depending on the formulation used). The total sodium cyanide
content can vary from 70 to 90 g/l and working pH around 10. The deposited alloy contains
65 to 80 % of copper and the colour is light yellow. It can be used as a flash over a bright
substrate or if heavier deposits are used then different finishes can be obtained through a
subsequent chemical colouring of the deposit.

2.5.1.5 Bronze

Bronze is copper alloyed with tin and zinc. Cyanide bronze alloy is used as a decorative plating
process. It is used as a substitute for nickel in jewellery as a nickel free coating to avoid skin
allergy effects. Acid bronze is under development [124, Germany, 2003].

The metal concentration in this stannate and cyanide-based electrolyte is 4 10 g/l of stannate,
4 20 g/l copper, and 1 4 g/l zinc, with 6 10 g/l potassium cyanide. It is used in two
different colours: white or yellow bronze.

Lead is used in low concentration as a brightener in some electrolytes. Its future use in many
products is banned by new directives [98, EC, 2003, 99, EC, 2000].

Cyanide oxidises with the passage of current to carbonate. Solutions have to be discarded as
soon as the carbonate level exceeds 40 g/l.

Chapter 2
44 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Environmental considerations
Process tanks may need to be equipped with fume extraction to remove generated aerosols.

Effluent can be treated for pH, cyanide and metals in a typical waste water treatment plant with
a cyanide oxidation step.

2.5.2 Nickel electroplating

[73, BSTSA, ] Nickel electroplating and electroless plating processes are used in a wide range
of industrial and consumer applications. Although the prime function of these processes is to
improve the resistance of substrates to corrosion, wear and abrasion, nickel provides a smooth,
highly reflective and corrosion-resistant coating below a range of other coatings for decorative
finishes.

Nickel plating processes - including both electrolytic and electroless (autocatalytic)
systems - can conveniently be considered in seven separate categories.

Nickel/chromium electroplating
The most important application of nickel is in nickel/chromium electroplated coatings,
commonly called chrome plating. They consist of a very thin chromium topcoat (1 %) over an
undercoat of nickel (99 %). Nickel provides a very smooth, brilliant corrosion-resistant finish.

Nickel electroplating with other topcoats
Brass, gold and silver topcoat systems are used as alternatives to chromium.

Nickel electroplating
Nickel can be used on its own without any topcoat. Generally, this is only for engineering
purposes, such as refurbishment of worn components.

Nickel composite electroplating systems
Almost uniquely, nickel matrixes can be formed in which inert, non-metallic particles, such as
silicon carbide, diamond or PTFE are incorporated by co-deposition to improve engineering
properties such as hardness, abrasion resistance and coefficient of friction.

Nickel alloy electroplating
Electrodeposited nickel alloys of commercial significance include zinc-nickel, nickel-cobalt,
and nickel-iron.

Nickel electroforming
Nickel electroforming is a unique process that allows articles to be produced by the
electrodeposition of relatively thick nickel layers - it is a vital part of the process of
manufacturing compact discs, DVDs, holograms and screen printing cylinders.

Electroless nickel plating
This is a chemical process giving hard uniform coatings. They can also be deposited on
materials that cannot be electroplated, such as plastics and some alloys. A full description of
these processes is given in Section 2.5.8.

Overall environmental considerations
The health issues related to nickel metal and its soluble salts, and the principal areas of concern
are described in Section 1.4.4.1.

Nickel solutions are likely to require agitation and the choice of agitation can affect the amount
of airborne pollutants, see Section 4.3. Effectiveness of distribution can be improved by the
addition of wetting agents.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 45
Exhaust extraction is regularly used and mist eliminators are often employed and the effluents
may be treated with other waste waters (see below).

Waste waters can be treated in a typical waste water treatment plant. However, waste waters
containing nickel must be separated from cyanide-bearing waste waters, as nickel forms stable
complexes with cyanide which are difficult to treat. Contact with other complexing agents
should also be avoided.

Solid residues will require management as a hazardous waste [92, EC, 1991, 100, EC, 2000].

Substrate considerations
Nickel is regularly deposited onto a wide range of metallic substrate materials commonly used
in manufacturing processes such as steel, copper, brass, zinc alloys, aluminium, and magnesium
as well as onto a range of plastics substrates.

It can successfully be plated directly, achieving good adhesion, onto some of these substrates
(steel, copper and lead-free brass) if the correct cleaning and other pretreatment processes (see
Section 2.3) are properly carried out.

Zinc alloys are, however, susceptible to corrosive attack in acidic nickel plating solutions and
consequently require a layer of copper deposited from a cyanide solution (see Section 2.5.1)
before nickel can be successfully deposited.

With aluminium and its alloys, because of their very high surface reactivity, it is necessary to
deposit a layer of zinc (produced by non-electrolytic chemical treatments known as the zincate
or double zincate processes) before a layer of copper can be applied, again from a cyanide-
based solution. Magnesium alloys require similar treatment.

2.5.2.1 Watts-type nickel solutions

Watts-type nickel solutions account for the majority of solutions used in the nickel plating
industry, including those used for nickel-chromium plating, nickel with other topcoat systems
and composite nickel plating. Nickel sulphate (240 - 375 g/l) is used with nickel chloride
(35 - 60 g/l) and boric acid (30 - 45 g/l). Operating temperatures can range from 25 to 70 C
although the more restricted range of 50 to 60 C is more common. The pH is normally
3.5 - 4.5. Formulations with a nickel chloride content at the higher end of the range may be used
to achieve increased deposition rates.

Watts-type solutions can be used without any additions to produce dull nickel deposits, although
wetting agents are almost always added to reduce gas bubble retention on the nickel surface
which would result in pitting. However, Watts-type solutions are most frequently employed
with the addition of organic compounds. These modify the metallurgical structure of the nickel
to produce either a lustrous and fully bright appearance or alternatively semi-bright or satin
nickel deposits. As well as altering the visual appearance of the nickel, these additives also
inevitably bring about changes in deposit ductility, hardness and internal stress. Typical
additions depend on the required function of the nickel deposit and varies from a small amount
of organic semi-brightener (<1 ml/l) and wetting agent (<1 ml/l) for a semi-bright finish to
primary and secondary brighteners at 10 - 20 ml/l and <10 ml/l wetting agent for a bright finish.

There are many types of organic compounds used to modify the properties of deposits produced
from Watts-type solutions. In general, they are added as proprietary mixtures.

Chapter 2
46 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
If regularly analysed, used and maintained with care, Watts-type solutions can have an almost
indefinite working life. Nickel metal deposited at the cathode is rather more than fully
replenished by that dissolved at the anode since the cathode efficiency is normally only between
96 98 %, compared to an anode efficiency of 100 %. This small difference in efficiencies is
normally compensated for by removal (drag-out) of solution from the process tanks by work
being carried forward into the rinsing system. In systems where drag-out is low, the solution
concentration may actually increase; this may require treatment to keep the concentration within
operating limits.

The problem most likely to shorten the working life of the nickel solution is the introduction of
contamination which can be either inorganic or organic in nature.

Inorganic contaminants can be introduced by an impure water supply, solution carried forward
into the nickel solution from those preceding it in the process chain (e.g. cleaning solutions) or
metallic components accidentally dropped into the nickel solution, such as work falling from
jigs, subsequently dissolving into the process solution. Some inorganic contaminants (Fe) can
be removed by measures such as high pH precipitation and others (Cu and Zn) by low current
density electrolysis known as plating out, see Section 4.11.9.

A considerable number of organic contaminants can be removed simply by filtration over
activated carbon or using adsorber polymers. Others may require additional treatment either
with hydrogen peroxide or with potassium permanganate in order to break down the compound
into simpler ones that can then be removed by active carbon treatment.

Environmental considerations
See overall environmental considerations.

The wetting agents used do not usually interfere with typical waste water treatments.

With suitable maintenance and rinsing measures, closed loop operation can be achieved,
reducing effluent treatment requirements and increasing raw material and water conservation.

2.5.2.2 Nickel sulphamate-based solutions

These solutions are widely used, and most frequently in electroforming applications where the
low internal stress of the deposits they produce is absolutely vital. In these cases chloride-free
solutions can be used (but only if a form of sulphur-activated nickel anode material is
employed) to reduce deposit stress to a minimum. They are also used in barrel plating
operations and reel-to-reel, since their higher electrical conductivity allows faster deposition
rates to be used, and for thicker layers (>2000 ]m).

Generally, sulphamate-based solutions are not used in situations where Watts-type solutions
will prove effective due to their higher cost.

The solutions are based on nickel sulphamate (rather than nickel sulphate) in concentrations
ranging from 350 to 600 g/l of the tetrahydrate salt, allowing a higher current. These solutions
always contain boric acid (35 45 g/l) and frequently nickel chloride (1 - 15 g/l).

These solutions normally operate in similar temperature and pH ranges as those used for Watts-
type solutions although high concentration sulphamate solutions that are used to achieve high
metal deposition rates, using current densities up to 35 A/dm
2
, are often operated at around
70 C.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 47
Sulphamate-based solutions are frequently used without any additions, other than wetting agents
to reduce pitting. However, selected organic compounds, such as saccharin and naphthalene
tri-sulphonic acid, can be added to the solution to increase deposit hardness or to control deposit
internal stress.

Like Watts-type solutions, those based on nickel sulphamate can have an almost indefinite life if
analysed regularly and carefully maintained. There is, however, an additional complication to be
considered in relation to the chemical and electrochemical stability of the sulphamate anion. At
higher temperatures and lower pH values this will hydrolyse to produce sulphate ions plus
ammonium ions in solution. The ammonium ion increases the deposit stress and hardness to
unacceptable levels and, furthermore, cannot be removed from the solution. In addition, if the
anodes in the process solution become passive, the sulphamate anion will undergo
electrochemical oxidation to produce an unspecified mixture of by-products that radically and
detrimentally affect deposit properties.

The avoidance of inorganic and organic contamination and treatment are as for Watts-type
solutions.

Environmental considerations
Issues relating to solution loss by drag-out and effluent treatment are the same as for Watts-
type ones.
2.5.2.3 Nickel chloride-based solutions

Solutions based on nickel chloride have very limited uses due to the very high internal stresses
of the deposits they produce. One exception is the Woods nickel strike solution which normally
consists of 240 g/l of nickel chloride hexahydrate plus 125 ml/l hydrochloric acid and is
operated at 20 - 30 C. It is used for one specific purpose only: to provide an initial adherent
nickel layer on the surface of materials, such as stainless steel and nickel-chromium alloys,
where it is difficult to achieve adhesion due to the naturally forming passive oxide film.

2.5.2.4 Nickel sulphate-based solutions

Solutions based on nickel sulphate and not containing nickel chloride are only rarely used as
they do not promote good dissolution of the nickel anode material. Formulations similar to the
Watts-type solution (but without chloride) can be used when it is vital to use inert anodes in
order to deposit into highly inaccessible recesses.

A sulphate-based (70 g/l nickel sulphate plus 100 g/l sulphuric acid) nickel strike solution is
sometimes used for a similar purpose as the Woods solution (see above).

2.5.2.5 Other nickel plating solutions

Solutions based on nickel fluoroborate are mentioned in literature but currently find little, if
any, commercial application.

2.5.2.6 Nickel alloy plating solutions

Nickel-cobalt alloys are used in electroforming because they are harder than pure nickel and
nickel-iron alloys find applications in the electronics industry, generally related to their
magnetic properties. Solutions used for depositing both types of alloy are normally based on the
standard Watts-type or nickel sulphamate formulations, with the same issues of operation and
maintenance.
Chapter 2
48 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Nickel-iron processes, however, require special additives to stabilise the ferrous ions in solution
and prevent spontaneous oxidation to the ferric state.

Nickel-zinc alloy plating processes that produce alloys containing 10 - 14 % nickel have been
developed recently and are becoming increasingly important since they can provide almost
10 times the level of corrosion protection that can be achieved with pure zinc (see Section
2.5.4.).

2.5.3 Chromium plating

[3, CETS, 2002] Chromium plating has found wide usage both as a decorative surface finish
(bright chromium plating) and as a functional coating (hard chromium plating), because of its
typical high hardness and wear resistance properties. It is also widely used in packaging
applications (see Section 1.3.2).

For decoration, often referred to as bright chrome or bright chromium, it is usually applied as a
thin layer to prevent the corrosion of the very level and bright surfaces generated by bright
nickel undercoats. Deposit thickness is generally in the range 0.1 to 0.4 ]m [73, BSTSA, , 124,
Germany, 2003], with a treatment time from 2 to 13 minutes [73, BSTSA]. The finish has a
typical silver-bright colour and has a very high resistance to tarnishing.

Bright chromium can be plated either from a hexavalent or trivalent chromium electrolytes [122,
UBA, 2003].

Hard chromium plating (usually known as hard chrome) consists of heavy deposits applied on
particular components (drive shafts, hydraulic cylinders, aircraft landing gear [73, BSTSA, ]
pins, valves, etc.) to give high resistance to mechanical and wear damage. Hard chromium
plating can only be plated from hexavalent chromium electrolytes.

Aerosols are generated from the hexavalent process solution by significant cathodic hydrogen
evolution. The health effects of hexavalent chromium are described in Section 1.4.4.1.
Theoretically, trivalent processes based on a chloride solution may produce hazardous organic
halogens (AOX) and chlorine gas, but production solutions prevent this by additives reducing
the chlorine. There is no problem with sulphate-based solutions.

Further issues relating to Cr(III) and Cr(VI) are discussed in Section 4.9.6.
Annex 8.10 contains a spreadsheet setting out all the comments received and their validation.

Overall environmental considerations for hexavalent chromium
Process tanks are normally equipped with fume extraction to remove hexavalent chromium
aerosols.

Fume suppressants may be used to control foaming and to reduce the amount of aerosol,
whether in conjunction with fume extraction or not [73, BSTSA, ]. However, the suppressants
are based on PFOS, which is toxic and persistent [73, BSTSA, ].

Extracted vapours may be treated through a suitable mist eliminator and the wash liquor treated
with other chromium effluents.

Effluents may be treated in a typical waste water treatment plant, with reduction of Cr(VI) to
Cr(III) followed by flocculation and precipitation.

Cr(III) solutions do not require separation and reduction prior to treatment.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 49
2.5.3.1 Bright chromium plating (hexavalent chromium electrolytes)

Bright hexavalent chromium plating electrolytes are based on chromic acid (80 - 400 g/l),
sulphate as the primary catalyst (0.8 - 5.0 g/l) such as fluoride ions (<2 % of the concentration
of the chromic acid). Where high corrosion protection is required so-called micro-cracked or
micro-porous chromium coating can be applied using readily available techniques, with a
thickness from 0.7 to 0.8 ]m, and a treatment time of 7 - 8 minutes [113, Austria, 2003].

Decorative chromium coating properties are determined by the characteristics of the nickel
underlayer, by the CrO
3
/catalyst ratio and by the operating temperature (20 45 C) [73,
BSTSA, ]; [124, Germany, 2003].

Environmental considerations
See overall environmental considerations for hexavalent chromium, above.

2.5.3.2 Bright chromium plating (trivalent chromium electrolytes)

Bright trivalent chromium electroplating electrolytes are based on chromium III compounds,
such as sulphate or chloride, together with proprietary chemicals. The electrolyte contains only
about 20 g/l of the trivalent chromium, compared with about 200 g/l of chromic acid in the
hexavalent chromium process.

Currently, trivalent chromium can only be used for decorative finishes, and cannot replace
hexavalent chromium for hard chrome plating (see Section 4.9.8.3) [124, Germany, 2003]

The use of trivalent chromium eliminates the carcinogenic and other hazards associated with
hexavalent chromium in the workplace. Fume extraction and scrubbing, or fume suppressant are
not required for hexavalent chromium. However, additives are required to prevent the formation
of free chlorine and AOX.

The lower electrolyte concentration has a lower viscosity than the hexavalent electrolyte. This
results in better draining of plated parts, and subsequently less drag-out, less loss of electrolyte,
less effluent treatment required and less chromium-containing waste being produced.

Environmental considerations
There is no hexavalent chromium aerosol to control, but fume extraction may be required to
deal with any acid fumes [115, CETS, 2003, 124, Germany, 2003].

Fume extraction will assist with, providing evaporation and sufficient volume reduction for
additions made during solution maintenance [124, Germany, 2003] or returned drag-out from
rinsing processes. However, evaporation may be needed.

The significantly reduced drag-out losses result in much reduced associated effluent treatment
and sludge disposal requirements: up to 90 % reduction is possible.

The waste water requires less chemical treatment as the chromium is already in the trivalent
state and will precipitated at a suitable pH.

2.5.3.3 Black chromium plating
[113, Austria, 2003]

Black chromium finishes can be achieved for decorative black pieces and on the same substrates
as for bright chromium plating. They are also plated onto a preceding nickel layer. Usually, they
are treated in emulsions to achieve a decorative finish after the plating process (see Section
2.5.11).They are based on hexavalent chromic acid electrolytes (350 - 520 g/l) and catalysts
(nitrates, fluorides). The layers are porous and <1]m.

Chapter 2
50 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Environmental considerations
See overall environmental considerations for hexavalent chromium, above.
Although not usually required, there may be a need to treat nitrates and/or fluorides in any waste
waters.

2.5.3.4 Hard chromium plating

[3, CETS, 2002, 74, BSTSA, ] Hard chromium plating electrolytes are based on chromic acid
(180 350 g/l) and on one of the following catalysts:

sulphate ions (1.8 6.0 g/l)
mixed sulphate and fluoride ions (<2 % of the content of the chromic acid)
pre-prepared proprietary fluoride-free (<2 % of the content of the chromic acid).

The catalyst choice is fundamental to the efficiency of the electrolyte (from 25 - 33 % [73,
BSTSA, ] for the sulphate catalyst to 25 27 % for the pre-prepared proprietary fluoride-free
type). The type of catalyst used, and the operating temperature have a great influence both on
the physical properties (cracked, micro-cracked and crack-free coatings) and on the chemical
and mechanical properties, e.g. the corrosion and wear resistance, the mechanical workability,
etc.

Environmental considerations
See overall environmental considerations for hexavalent chromium, above.

Due to the long plating times and high process temperatures (50 - 60 C) there is usually
sufficient evaporation to use rinse-water returned from the subsequent rinsing station. This may
enable closed loop operation, with or without an evaporator. Alternatively, there may be high
water consumption [73, BSTSA, ].

2.5.4 Zinc and zinc alloy plating

[3, CETS, 2002, 78, BSTSA, ] Zinc and zinc alloy coatings are the most widely used
electrolytic surface treatment, providing corrosion resistance and/or cheap decorative coating to
a very wide variety of iron and steel items for the automotive, construction and other industries.
For example, they are used for steel sheet or wire, screws, washers, nuts, bolts, shopping
trolleys, construction frames (chassis) and casings for domestic appliances (such as washing
machines) and many other kinds of applications (see Section 1.1).

Zinc layers require post-treatment (see Section 2.5.17): in conjunction with various coatings,
zinc layers of only 2.5 18 ]m thick will be sufficient to protect parts for their whole working
lifetime [159, TWG, 2004].

Zinc plating has been in existence for a hundred years and because of its wide application, many
different electrolyte systems are in use. The most common ones are described below.

Overall environmental considerations
Zinc ores contain cadmium. At the purity used for zinc electroplating, anodes contain about 1
gram of cadmium per tonne of zinc or 0.0001 %. EN 1179: requires a zinc purity of 99.995 %.
The maximum amount of cadmium allowed is 0.003 %, although in practice, this is about
0.0003 % or 3 g per tonne [124, Germany, 2003] Trace quantities of cadmium may therefore
appear in the effluent. These traces are largely removed in typical waste water treatment plants,
and will be in the sludge produced. The quantities in either treated effluent or wastes are not
usually significant. Treatment to remove zinc to regulatory levels are usually sufficient to
remove this incident cadmium. If necessary, additional steps such as filtering may be added (see
Section 4.16.10 [124, Germany, 2003].
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 51
2.5.4.1 Alkaline cyanide zinc

This is used mainly for technical (non-decorative) corrosion-resistant layers. The process
electrolytes are easy to operate, and have compositions of zinc oxide (10 30 g zinc/l), sodium
hydroxide (80 120 g/l) and sodium cyanide (5 100 g/l). They operate at pH values close to
14, using both soluble and insoluble anodes.

Alkali zinc gives coating with good post-forming properties. Some sources suggest this is due to
a fine structure of the deposit, others that is due to the cleaning action of the cyanide solution
giving good adhesion [73, BSTSA, ].

The cyanide-based electrolyte has good throwing power into holes and blind spaces.

The plating solution has low conductivity, thus a higher voltage (6 - 8 V for jig plating,
10 -15 V for barrel plating) and a higher energy demand is needed. [73, BSTSA, ] Carbonate
build-up from cyanide decomposition can be dealt with by crystallising out (see Section 4.11.4),
which also removes metallic impurities in the electrolyte.

The current efficiency is from 50 % to 75 % on a well-run process at an average current density
of 2A/m
2
[73, BSTSA, ], but decreases with increasing current density.

Fume extraction of the process tanks to remove aerosols may be used.

Environmental considerations
There is an industry tendency towards decreasing the cyanide content because of environmental
and safety reasons.

Cyanide in rinse-waters can be readily oxidised by several methods in the waste water treatment
plant.

Zinc can be readily removed in a typical waste water treatment plant.

2.5.4.2 Alkaline cyanide-free zinc

These are mainly applied for technical corrosion-resistant layers (non-decorative). The process
solutions contain zinc oxide (5 15 g zinc/l) and sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide
(100 150 g/l). This process may require better pre-cleaning treatment than for cyanide
solutions [73, BSTSA, ]. The process can give better metal distribution than cyanide
electrolytes.

The plating solution has a low conductivity, thus a higher voltage (6 - 8 V for jig plating,
10 - 15 V for barrel plating) and higher energy demand is needed

Current efficiency 65 - 70 %, decreasing with increasing current density. 70 85 % is
achievable at 2A/m
2
for well-managed processes [129, Spain, 2003, CETS, 2003 #115].

Environmental considerations
Zinc from rinses can be readily removed in an waste water treatment plant.

Aerosols from the bath can be reduced by using wetting agents, which create a foam blanket
over the bath.]. However, the suppressants may be based on PFOS, which is toxic and persistent
[73, BSTSA, ].

Air extraction may be required from the plating vats and any external dissolution tank for zinc
metal (see Section 2.13.3[113, Austria, 2003].

Chapter 2
52 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
This process has a much higher energy demand than other zinc-processes (cooling, lower
current efficiency). Potassium electrolytes have better current efficiency than sodium
electrolytes [113, Austria, 2003].

2.5.4.3 Acid zinc

Acid zinc electrolytes give bright decorative layers, and used, for example, on furniture frames,
shopping trolleys and baskets. In conjunction with post-treatments, they provide corrosion
resistance comparable with finishes from alkaline-type electrolytes. Metal distribution is poor to
acceptable, but this improves with warm electrolytes.

Electrolytes contain zinc chloride (30 55 g zinc/l), potassium and/or [124, Germany, 2003]
sodium chloride (130 - 180 g/l) [116, Czech-Republic, 2003], boric acid (10 40 g/l) and
wetting agent. Only soluble anodes are used. The solutions have good conductivity and high
cathode efficiency, typically 93 - 96 %. It has a lower energy demand than alkali processes[73,
BSTSA, ].

Plating tanks may be equipped with fume extraction hoods to remove chloride-containing mists,
thus preventing the corrosion of equipment.

Environmental considerations
Current efficiency of the electrolyte means lower power consumption.

If the extracted air is passed through mist elimination, effluents may require treatment to adjust
pH and remove zinc.

Effluents may be easily treated in typical waste water treatment plants.

Acid zinc electrolytes generate more solids in effluent treatment than alkali cyanide processes,
resulting in possibly four times as much solids. This may be due to increased dissolution of steel
substrates, where the iron both bulks and acts as a flocculant in waste water treatment (Personal
communication, D. Hemsley).

2.5.4.4 Zinc alloy plating

Zinc alloy coatings provide extended corrosion resistance and the main use is for automotive
applications (see Sections 1.1 and 2.9).

The main zinc alloys deposited are:

zinc-iron (<1 % Fe), from alkaline cyanide-free electrolytes
zinc-cobalt (<3 % Co), from acid or alkaline cyanide-free electrolytes
zinc-nickel (<15 % Ni), from acid (ammonium chloride-based) or alkaline cyanide-free
electrolytes. Alloys containing 10 % - 14 % nickel have been developed recently and
are becoming increasingly important since they can provide almost 10 times the level of
corrosion protection than can be achieved with pure zinc. They can be deposited either
from acidic chloride-based solutions or from alkaline solutions where the relatively low
concentration of nickel in solution (1 - 2 g/l) is stabilised by the addition of small
amounts of amines. The alkaline solutions are becoming the preferred formulations
since they give a more consistent alloy composition on complex work geometry [115,
CETS, 2003].

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 53
Environmental considerations
Plating tanks may be equipped with fume extraction hoods to capture aerosols or ammonium
chloride fumes.

The extracted air may be passed through mist elimination.
Alkaline cyanide-free effluents are treated in typical waste water plants.

Treatment of effluents from ammonium chloride-based electrolytes is difficult and has to be
effected separately. Recovery of drag-out can be close to 100 % (closed loop operation) and this
facilitates effluent treatment.

For zinc-nickel, the dilution factor that occurs in rinse-waters generally overcomes the
complexing effect of the amines so that special treatment is not required to remove the nickel
from the effluent. If it is necessary to dispose of quantities of undiluted process solution,
however, chlorination treatment will be necessary be to destroy nickel amine complexes before
the nickel can be precipitated from the effluent stream [73, BSTSA, ].

2.5.5 Cadmium plating

[114, Belgium, 2003, 115, CETS, 2003, 121, France, 2003] Cadmium is mainly used to protect
parts made of steel, and aluminium or titanium alloys. It has particular properties: a low risk of
hydrogen embrittlement, a low friction coefficient and constant torque for fasteners, and has
better throwing power and penetration as well as better corrosion resistance than zinc. Its
toxicity has resulted in it being restricted to specific vital technical uses where it is difficult to
replace in aviation and aerospace, military equipment, mining and nuclear industries and some
safety critical electrical contacts (see Section 1.4.4.1, Annex 8.1, [105, EC, 1967])

Cadmium plating can be performed in acidic as well as alkaline cyanide baths. The pretreatment
is the same as for zinc plating. After plating the coating is often given a passivation treatment in
chromic acid. High strength steel parts are heat treated to minimise the hydrogen uptake and
then activated in diluted nitrous acid before chromating. Cadmium covering layers can be
chromate plated.

Electrolytes may be based on cyanide, fluoroborate, sulphate or chloride:

electrolyte based on cyanide:
NaOH: 20 g/l; NaCN: 120 g/l; cadmium: 20 -30 g/l; temperature: 20 - 35 C
electrolyte based on fluoroborate:
Cadmium fluoroborate: 250 g/l; ammonium fluoroborate: 60 g/l; boric acid: 25 g/l;
temperature: 20 - 35 C
electrolyte based on sulphate:
Cadmium sulphate: 52 - 85 g/l; sulphuric acid: 50 - 120 g; temperature: 18 - 30 C
electrolyte based on chloride:
Cadmium chloride: 114 g/l; ammonium chloride: 112 g/l; complexing agent (EDTA,
NTA): 180 g/l

Environmental considerations
The toxic effects of cadmium are well-known. [114, Belgium, 2003], see Annex 8.1.

Discharge levels from waste water treatment plants are likely to be orders of magnitude lower
than for other metals (such as zinc, see Annex 8.3). Effluent may be treated by chemical-
physical treatment. The precipitation of cadmium can be to improve by adding Fe
2+
during the
coagulation step, when there is a co-precipitation of cadmium and iron. It can be very difficult
to obtain very low emission values for cadmium by precipitation. Additional treatment may be
required, such as separate treatment at the point source prior to mixing with other effluents: e.g.
electrolysis, mobile ion exchangers, evaporation [114, Belgium, 2003, 121, France, 2003].

Chapter 2
54 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.5.6 Tin and alloy plating

Tin plated metal is widely used in many applications because of its unique properties. Plated tin
coatings are non-toxic, ductile, resistant to corrosion, easy to coat, and have high throwing and
good distribution properties. This makes it possible to plate items with complex shapes to a
uniform thickness compared with hot tin dipping methods. Tin finishes are also subsequently
easier to solder components onto[73, BSTSA, ].

The main applications of tin are the coating of steel coil for packaging of food, beverages and
aerosols, etc (see Sections 1.3.2 and 2.9.9). It is also widely used in printed circuit boards (see
Section 2.11), electronic components [73, BSTSA, ], appliance chassis, as well as for kitchen
utensils.

Several different electrolytes are available, such as acid stannous sulphate, acid tin fluoroborate,
alkaline sodium or potassium stannate and more recently the stannous systems based on organic
acids, such as methane sulphonic acid, (MSA) and accounts for 13 % of European tin plate
production [73, BSTSA, ]. The simpler sulphate baths containing stannous sulphate, sulphuric
acid and addition agents (antioxidants for stannous tin, plus grain refiner) are the most popular
in rack and barrel applications because of their high current efficiency [73, BSTSA, ].

Tin lead plating is the most commonly tin plated alloy. It is used as solder coat in different alloy
ratios (60/40, 90/10, 95/5) traditionally using stannous, and lead fluoroborates with fluoroboric
acid and additives[73, BSTSA, ].

Non-fluoroboric tin lead electrolytes are now available based on the organic methane sulphonate
acid They have improved stability, low sludge formation, higher plating rates, [73, BSTSA, ]
better deposit properties and structure of the deposit. They are widely-used in reel- to-reel
machines, as well as in barrel processing.

Tin-nickel has high throwing power, good distribution of metal, ductile, non-toxic, and is
readily soldered to.

Environmental considerations
Process tanks may be equipped with fume extraction to remove aerosols generated during the
electrolysis.

Effluents may be treated in typical waste water plant.

The MSA-based process is fully biodegradable, contains no chelates, complexing agents or
phenols, has low COD and simple waste treatment (neutralisation and filtration) [73, BSTSA, ].

Fluoroborate bath effluents should be pretreated separately to a typical waste water treatment
plant.

The organic load from MSA-based processes is usually biodegradable [73, BSTSA, ].

2.5.7 Precious metal plating

[3, CETS, 2002, 75, BSTSA, ] Silver and gold have been deposited electrolytically since the
first half of the nineteenth century. More recently, processes for the so-called platinum metals
(palladium, rhodium, ruthenium and platinum) have also been developed. Thin layers of less
than 1m are used to make a wide range of items appear valuable without commensurate cost.
They also provide stain and corrosion resistance. Other specific technical properties such as
conductivity, hardness and wear resistance have led to their wide-spread application in the
electric and electronic industries.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 55
2.5.7.1 Silver

[73, BSTSA, ] The silver plating of cutlery and hollowware is one of the oldest decorative
applications of electroplating (see Chapter 1). Bright silver deposits are widely used for
jewellery as well as on ornaments, trophies, giftware, etc. Due to its high conductivity and
mechanical and chemical properties, silver layers are found on many components of electrical
and electronic devices. Also, silver-palladium layers as a substitute for gold on electrical
connectors have recently gained importance.

The majority of silver electrolytes are based on potassium-silver cyanide (potassium dicyano-
argentate). A silver content of 30 65 g/l with free potassium cyanide of 100 160 g/l and
potassium carbonate (15 20 g/l) is necessary for good plating performance. However, a
potassium carbonate concentration of over 200 g/l makes it necessary to discard the electrolytes.

Attempts to replace cyanide, for example by thiosulphate and alternative complexing agents,
have had limited success due to lower stability of the bath, high cost and cosmetic differences of
the deposit.

Environmental considerations
The cost of silver makes recovery economic. Residues of silver may be recovered from rinse-
water through electrolysis or ion exchange. Recovery of silver from spent electrolytes may be
achieved through precipitation with zinc powder.

Plating tanks may be equipped with fume extraction hoods to remove cyanide fumes.

Cyanide can be readily oxidised in typical effluent treatment in waste water treatment plants.

2.5.7.2 Gold

[73, BSTSA, ] Gold can be plated using rack, barrel or high speed equipment either as a very
pure metal or as an alloy. It finds use in a wide range of industries such as connectors, printed
circuit boards, integrated circuits, semiconductor manufacture, bathroom fittings, giftware,
tableware, buttons, watches, pens, jewellery, and spectacle frames.

The majority of gold plating solutions in commercial plating facilities, whether the deposit has a
decorative or a functional requirement are based on mildly acid solutions of gold potassium
cyanide as potassium cyanoaurate, KAu(CN)
2
. These solutions typically contain 2 - 6 g/l of gold
together with buffering agents to maintain the pH. These solutions often contain alloying metals
such as cobalt, nickel, iron or indium. These harden, increase the wear resistance, and brighten
the deposit. They also give distinctive colours.

A gold strike solution is often used to deposit the initial layer of gold to promote adhesion.
Strike solutions usually based on gold potassium cyanide at 1 - 2 g/l but may use gold (III)
potassium cyanide (KAu(CN)
4
) at a pH of around 1. These are often used on difficult to plate
base materials such as stainless steel.

Alkaline solutions containing free cyanide are occasionally used for jewellery plating and for
electroforming.

There are non-cyanide gold electrolytes, which are based on one of the gold sulphite complexes,
which generally operate in mildly alkaline conditions, these typically contain 8 - 15g/l of gold
together with organic or inorganic brightener systems.

Chapter 2
56 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Environmental considerations
Drag-out recovery and gold recovery with electrochemical reactions on ion exchangers from the
rinse-water is economically viable.

Chelating agents resistant to degradation have been largely substituted by biodegradable ones.

Effluent treatment is similar to other electroplating rinse streams in typical waste water
treatment plants.

Air emissions from potassium gold cyanide plating operations can give rise to emissions of
hydrogen cyanide. The levels of emissions can be significant depending on the size of operation
when considered in conjunction with emission limits contained in the revised TA Luft
guidelines for air emissions regulation (inorganic gaseous substances Class II) [125, Ireland,
2003]

2.5.7.3 Palladium and alloys

Layers of palladium-nickel alloy (75 80 % Pd/25 20 % Ni) are hard, extremely ductile [73,
BSTSA, ] and have a white colour with good corrosion resistance. They are suitable for coating
spectacle frames and writing implements.

Pure palladium deposits are also used to substitute for nickel as a diffusion barrier below a final
gold flash on spectacle frames, jewellery and buttons. Sandwich layers of nickel, palladium or
palladium/nickel alloy and gold flash have proven applicability on printed circuit boards and
connectors as substitutes for hard gold layers.

The most common formulation is based on the complex tetraamine palladium (II) dichloride
(4 - 20g Pd/l), [73, BSTSA, ] containing ammonia. Alloying metals are nickel, cobalt and silver.

Environmental considerations
Besides drag-out recovery, electrolytic and ion exchange recovery of palladium are normally
practical.

Tanks for ammonia-containing electrolytes may be equipped with fume extraction hoods to
capture ammonia escaping from the plating electrolyte.

Effluents may be treated in typical waste water treatment plants.

2.5.7.4 Rhodium

Very thin rhodium deposits on silver have a silvery-white colour and are used to prevent
staining. Their hardness and wear resistance properties are suitable for technical applications
such as on reed contacts and on heavy duty connectors. Rhodium is also applied on reflectors
for optical equipment and in aerospace applications.

Electrolytes are based on rhodium (III) sulphate or rhodium (III) phosphate, with a rhodium
content of 2.5 20 g/l depending on their application for decorative (thickness of layer
0.05 - 0.5 ]m) or for technical purposes (thickness of layers 0.5 - >8 ]m), where selenium and
sulphites are added to prevent cracking.

Environmental considerations
Besides drag-out recovery, electrolytic and ion exchange recovery of rhodium are normal
practice.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 57
Tanks for sulphuric acid-containing electrolytes may be equipped with fume extraction hoods to
remove acid fumes.

Effluents may be treated in typical waste water treatment plants.

2.5.7.5 Platinum

Thin platinum layers are applied for decorative purposes, with thicker layers on electrical
devices and on equipment for the chemical industry. Non-soluble platinised titanium anodes and
anode baskets are in common use in electroplating.

Acid electrolytes are based on chloride, sulphate, nitrate and nitrite complexes of platinum,
alkaline electrolytes on phosphate, ammonia and sodium hydroxide complexes, with metal
contents of 6 40 g/l.

Environmental considerations
Besides drag-out recovery, electrolytic and ion exchange recovery of platinum are normal
practice.

Effluents may be treated in typical waste water treatment plants.

2.5.8 Autocatalytic plating (catalytic chemically reduced coatings)

This is also known as electroless plating according to BS EN ISO 4527: 2003, [73, BSTSA, ]
but the term should be avoided, according to [101, CEN, 2000]. The fundamental reaction
requires the presence of a catalytic metal the metal being deposited - that allows the reaction
to proceed. The advantages of the system are:

provided there is sufficient agitation to maintain fresh undepleted solution in contact
with all surfaces at all times, the deposit is uniform over the entire surface even if the
shape is highly complex
deposits are usually less porous than the same metal deposited electrolytically
racking or fixing is greatly simplified
non-conductors (such as plastic) are coated
deposits often have special chemical or physical properties since the deposit is an alloy
of the metal and a compound formed from the reducing agent. For example, with
hypophosphite [73, BSTSA, ] the deposit is an alloy of the metal and the metal
phosphide, and with boron reducing agents the metal and the metal boride.

Overall environmental considerations:
Autocatalytic coatings commonly generate more waste than other plating techniques, but
efficiency can vary significantly between facilities [69, NCDPPEA, 2003].

Improvement in process efficiency and a reduction in waste can be achieved by the use of
electrodialysis to continuously remove the by-products from the plating solutions during
operation [73, BSTSA, ].

Chapter 2
58 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.5.8.1 Autocatalytic nickel on metals

Autocatalytic nickel electrolytes are based on nickel sulphate and nickel chloride (nickel
2 - 10 g/l). Sodium hypophosphite (10 50 g/l) is the most often used reducing agent [73,
BSTSA, ]. Solutions also contain chelating agents (organic carboxylic acids 10 - 50 g/l) and
buffers as sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate. Cadmium may be present in some
formulations as a brightener, 1 - 5 mg/l giving approximately 0.03 % in the deposit. [73,
BSTSA, ] Lead may be used in some formulations as an alternative up to 3mg/l. Modern
formulations are available which avoid the use of both cadmium and lead, in line with the
requirements of the End-of-Life Vehicles Directive [99, EC, 2000].

Autocatalytically deposited nickel-alloy layers contain 2 15 % phosphorus.
Their key properties are:

uniform thickness of deposit irrespective of the size and shape of items to be plated,
provided that the plating solution can freely circulate around all surfaces of the
components to be treated
deposit thickness can be controlled accurately,
surface hardness as high as electroplated finishes and within the range 350- 750 Knoop
high resistance against wear and abrasion,
inherent high resistance to corrosion resistance,
good adhesion on base material,
special properties such as natural lubricity, easily soldered to, magnetic properties.

Applications include (among many others):

data storage devices as rigid memory discs
components for chemical and oil and gas industry
automotive, machine tool and electronics industries
plastics molding tools.

Environmental considerations
See overall environmental considerations for Section 2.5.8.

Fume extraction may be required at process tanks including mist elimination to remove nickel
containing aerosols.

The solution working life is short (6 - 8 MTOs, metal turnovers) due to the formation of
reaction by-products. Process performance deteriorates requiring frequent discarding of used
solutions. The working bath then requires disposal as a hazardous waste.

Effluents may have to be pretreated before discharge to the waste water treatment plant.
Ammonia, which can complex other metals, and can be oxidised. Hypophosphite ions and
phosphite ions can be oxidised to phosphates. The phosphate ion can be precipitate by adding
calcium ions during the neutralisation. Metals can be separated from effluents by precipitation,
plate-out or ion-exchange.

The strong chelating agent may require separate waste water treatment.

There may be trace amounts of cadmium and lead in the effluent. [124, Germany, 2003]

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 59
2.5.8.2 Autocatalytic nickel coating for plastics

Similarly to autocatalytic copper, electroless nickel solutions are used for generating a first
conductive metal layer on plastic surfaces prior to further electrolytic metal (copper, nickel)
deposition. [73, BSTSA, ]

Plastics require etching (see Section 2.3.10.2) before deposition. Process solutions contain
nickel sulphate or nickel chloride (nickel 2 - 5 g/l), reducing agents e.g. sodium hypophosphite
(5 20 g/l), dimethylaminoborane (>10 g/l) and optionally, chelating compounds such as
organic acids. Both weakly acidic (sulphuric acid at pH 3 - 6) and alkaline solutions (sodium
hydroxide or ammonia hydroxide at pH 8 - 10) are in use.

An example of a process line plating on plastics (PCBs) using autocatalytic nickel [73, BSTSA,
] is shown in Figure 2.7

Environmental considerations
See overall environmental considerations

Fume extraction may be used for alkaline or high temperature processes. Typical effluent
treatment will remove metals except where effluents contain strong chelating agents, which may
have to be treated separately.

2.5.8.3 Autocatalytic copper on metals and plastics

Autocatalytic copper plating is still a key process [73, BSTSA, ] in printed circuit boards (see
Section 2.11) and as well as for the metallisation of plastics. The main properties of the copper
layers are uniform thickness, and fine crystalline, ductile layers with low internal stress. Copper
layers are applied on small items as buttons, fashion jewellery as well as on plastic housings for
electric shielding and printed circuit boards.

Plastics require etching (pretreatment, see Section 2.3) before deposition. Copper deposition
starts on metal nuclei such as palladium and continues autocatalytically, thus providing an
initial conductive layer. The deposition rate is 5 - 8 ]m/h. The solution has a copper content of
2 5 g/l, with sodium hydroxide (15 20 g/l), chelating agents such as EDTA or similar
(10 - 15 g/l) or tartrates (5 10 g/l) and reducing agents, e.g. formaldehyde (3 5 g/l).

The process solution lifetime is limited by the build-up of reaction products.

Environmental considerations
See overall environmental considerations.

Fume extraction for the process tanks may be necessary to remove gases (formaldehyde and
others).

Effluent containing EDTA requires separate treatment as EDTA will prevent the precipitation of
metals in the treatment process. There was an industry trend to replace EDTA as a chelating
agent, although high specification work may require its use and the trend is currently being
reversed [22, Fraunhofer, 2002]. Some parts of industry report the trend is being maintained
[73, BSTSA, ].

Chapter 2
60 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.5.9 Immersion or displacement coatings non-catalytic chemically
reduced coatings

Non-catalytic chemically reduced coatings have been in use for many years, and are often
known as immersion or displacement coatings. [38, Ullmann, 2002/3] They are formed when
the metal to be deposited is precipitated on its reduction in solution either (i) chemically from
solution, or (ii) the metallic substrate is more active than the ions in the solution in terms of the
electromotive or electrochemical series, e.g.

Cu
2+
+ Fe
0
YCu
0
+ Fe
2+
Although these deposits are often non-adherent and of poor physical quality, careful attention to
solution composition and operating conditions can produce deposits that are acceptable for
certain purposes. The zincate and stannate solutions used for plating aluminium are examples of
special finishes producing acceptable deposits.

Printed circuit boards
High purity deposits, usually only of gold, silver and tin, are widely used on printed circuit
boards. Thickness does not exceed 0.1 0.2 ]m. [121, France, 2003] (see Section 2.11.3.2).

Mirrors
Their best known use is in producing mirrored surfaces from silver, although other techniques
can now be used (such as vapour phase deposition). Their two main drawbacks are that only
relatively thin coatings can be deposited and that all surfaces, including the container, receive a
coating. While these solutions are sometimes used by immersion, they are now more often
applied by spraying the solutions from a dual spray gun.. [38, Ullmann, 2002/3] [116, Czech
Republic, 2003] The first step in silver coating of mirrors is the activation of the glass surface
by stannous chloride (SnCl
2
). This is followed by the application of a solution of silver nitrate
(AgNO
3
) and a reducing agent (usually glucose) by spraying. The precipitated silver (about 12
17 m thick is rinsed by deionised water. The Ag coating is fixed by cementing copper with
iron or zinc, forming a layer several m thick: the copper is precipitated from solution by
contact with the more electropositive silver deposit. This technique was discovered in 1835 and
is still the best one. Some years ago a Belgian patent was given for a technique which used tin
for fixation of Ag coating solution of Sn. This process is used by the largest producer of mirrors
in the Czech Republic. Passivation using mercaptosilanes is also used.

The metallic layers are protected by a 50 - 70 m of solvent-based lacquers. Replacement by
water-based lacquers has so far been unsuccessful.

Figure 2.8 shows an example of a mirror processing plant.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 61
Figure 2.8: Example of mirror processing line
(SVUOM, Czech Republic)

Environmental considerations
For mirrors: copper from the cementation process can form a complex in the waste water s, and
is difficult to precipitate in a typical waste water treatment plant. [116, Czech-Republic, 2003]

For printed circuit boards, the environmental considerations for gold and silver are as for tin
[73, BSTSA, ] (see Sections 2.5.6 and 2.5.7) Tin concentrations are low, and are treated in a
typical waste water treatment plant.

2.5.10 Electropainting or electrocoating

Also known as: electrophoretic painting, E-coat, Elpo, electrodeposition.

Electropainting is covered in detail in [90, EIPPCB, ].

The activity is increasingly found alongside surface treatment activities covered in this
document, both for subsequent painting and/or in conjunction with other coatings described
here. It is used to apply a protective coating after decorative finishes (for example, applying a
lacquer coat to brass plating) and as an alternative or supplement to corrosion-prevention layers,
such as replacing hexavalent chromium conversion coatings on its own or used in conjunction
with trivalent chromium systems, discussed in Sections 2.5.17 and 4.9.10.2. They may also
reduce friction, and enable parts to be evenly or readily distributed without surface damage
[124, Germany, 2003].

Common issues discussed in this document are:

rinsing and drag-out control techniques (Sections 2.4, 4.6 and 4.7)
solution maintenance (Section 4.11)
water usage (Sections 2.12.2 and 4.4.5)
electricity supply to the process and the workpieces (Sections 2.12.1.1 and 4.2.3)
waste water treatment (Sections 2.13.1 and 4.16).

Chapter 2
62 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.5.11 Lacquering

Lacquers are applied to protect and enhance decorative coatings (such as copper plating of
hollowware) or to supplement corrosion protection systems such as chromating (see Section
2.5.17). They also reduce friction, and enable parts to be evenly or readily distributed without
surface damage [124, Germany, 2003]. They can be applied by dipping in a proprietary water-
based solution or by electropainting (see Section 2.5.10) [76, BSTSA, ].

Topcoatings are applied immediately after chromate or trivalent chromium conversion coatings,
by dipping in an appropriate proprietary medium or by electropainting (electrophoretic
painting), see Section 2.5.10.

Environmental considerations
Effluents have no impact on typical waste water treatment plants. Rinsing waters may need to
be treated separately to reduce BOD or TOC levels in the discharged effluent.

2.5.12 Oiling

See coil coating, Section 2.9.5, for electrostatic oiling.

2.5.13 Anodising

The anodising of metals is an electrolytic surface oxidation process which enhances the natural
aptitude for the metal to oxidise; coatings can be 1000 times thicker than the natural layer
Aluminium is the most important material to be anodised, with alumina (Al
2
O
3
) formed at the
surface: magnesium, titanium, tantalum and niobium are also anodised in smaller quantities [3,
CETS, 2002, 45, France, 2003] [118, ESTAL, 2003].

Aluminium is normally (90 % of cases) anodised in sulphuric acid electrolyte. For special
applications, aluminium may be anodised in many different types of process solution:
phosphoric acid, sulphuric/oxalic acids, sulphuric/salicylic acids and chromic acid electrolytes.
[73, BSTSA, ].

A wide variety of current forms and wave shapes may be used for the process, depending on the
solution selected and the purpose of the anodic film. Direct current (DC), alternating current
(AC), and DC with superimposed AC. are all used in various processes.

The workpiece or substrate to be treated is made anodic. During the anodising process the
negatively charged anion migrates to the anode where it is discharged with a loss of one or more
electrons. The metal reacts with the oxygen of the anion and a layer of oxide forms on the
surface.

Figure 2.9 shows examples of decorative anodising options and Figure 2.10 shows a typical
anodising line layout.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 63
Mechanical
Grinding
and
Polishing
Cleaning
50C
5 - 10 min
dissolution
of
aluminum
2g /m
2
Etching
50C
20 - 25 min
dissolution
60 - 70 g/m
2
Al
Decorative
anodising
options
Sulphuric acid
electrolyte 20 C
10-50 min
H2SO4:180-200 g/l
Colourless oxide
layer
Special
Electrolyte
20C
10 - 50 min
H2SO4 150 g/l
oxalic acid
30 g/l
Coloured layer
Colouring
dissolution:
0.5 g/m2 Al
Electrochemical
Colouring
25C
3 - 15 min
dissolution 1g/m
2
Chemical
colouring
50C
3 - 5 min
dissolution
1 g/m
2
Sealing
100 C
15 - 50 min
nickel salts
Quality
Control
Pickling
HNO
3
100 - 150 g/l
3-5 min
Static double
rinsing
Rd: 1000
Rd:3
Rd: 300 - 500
Rinsing Rd: 5000
Parts to
be
treated
Finished
Parts
Rinsing
Rinsing
Rd: 5000 10000
Figure 2.9: Example of decorative anodising process options
[45, France, 2003] Note: Rd means rinsing ratio

The alumina coating is sealed to improve corrosion resistance and retain any surface colouring
(see Section 2.5.14). Sealing is described in Section 2.5.15.

Overall environmental considerations for all anodising processes
Anodised aluminium (coloured or not) is very easily recycled for metal recovery, i.e. anodising
processes have no significant effect on the recovery of aluminium metal, and other metals are
not added.

Typical emission levels after typical waste water treatment are given in Section 3.3.1
Chapter 2
64 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.5.13.1 Sulphuric acid anodising of aluminium

On most aluminium alloys a colourless, transparent aluminium oxide is formed, but alloys
containing high quantities of elements such as iron, manganese, silicium and others [118,
ESTAL, 2003] tend to give greyish or brownish coloured layers. The anodising voltage is in the
range of 17 22 V and the temperature of the electrolyte. is generally 20 C 5 C and
electrolyte concentration is generally 190 g/l 40 g/l H
2
SO
4
. A film thickness of 5 - 30 ]m is
used for decorative and protective sulphuric acid anodising. The working parameters may vary
according to the application, especially in architectural anodising. Sulphuric acid anodised
coatings are often coloured by special colouring processes. (See Figure 2.10). The oxide coating
is sealed to obtain improved corrosion resistance (see Section 2.5.15).

In hard anodising, a film thickness of 25 250 ]m is obtained. The electrolyte is operated at -
below 5 C [73, BSTSA, ]. Processes with oxalic acid and sulphuric acid with organic additions
can also be used for hard anodising. The hard anodising layer is normally not sealed. In this
state it can be impregnated with lubricants.

Environmental considerations
Acid concentrations and operating temperatures are low. If necessary, aerosols can be
minimised by a layer of foam. [118, ESTAL, 2003]. However, the suppressants may be based
on PFOS, which is toxic and persistent see Annex 8.2, [109, DEFRA, 2004], although
alternatives to PFOS exist and are used successfully [159, TWG, 2004].

Effluent may be treated in typical waste water treatment plants.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 65
Cleaning 1
Cleaning 2
Etching 1
Rinsing
Etching
Etching
Rinsing
Spray rinsing
Pickling
Rinsing after pickling
Anodising 1
Anodising 2
Rinsing after anodising
Anodising 3
Anodising 4
Rinsing after anodising
Hard anodising
Colouring
Rinsing after colouring
Rinsing
Extended duration rinsing
Spray rinsing
Rinsing in deionised water
Deionised water / Hot rinse
(after sealing)
Sealing 1
Sealing 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11a
11b
12
13a
13b
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
A
c
i
d
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
l
k
a
l
i
n
e
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
W
a
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
n
o
d
i
s
i
n
g
W
a
t
e
r
f
l
o
w
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
Figure 2.10: Typical anodising plant layout

2.5.13.2 Chromic acid anodising of aluminium

This forms an aluminium oxide film on most aluminium alloys ranging from a light to dark
grey. The process is mainly used for aerospace and military applications. Parts can be treated
after joining since residual chromic acid in the joins does not cause corrosion and the process
gives very limited degradation of fatigue properties of the materials [73, BSTSA, ].

The electrolyte contains 30 100 g of chromic acid per litre. The temperature is kept within the
range of 38 - 42 C for most aluminium alloys. The voltage cycle used depends on the alloy
treated and must be closely followed to avoid etching. The coating is thin with an average of
2 - 5 ]m and is relatively soft. Its corrosion resistance is good and the coating is normally not
sealed.

The regeneration of anodising baths using a retardation process extends the electrolyte life by
reducing its aluminium content.

Environmental considerations
Effluent may be treated in typical waste water plants.

Chapter 2
66 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Process tanks may to be equipped with fume extraction to remove generated acid aerosols and
gases. Section 1.4.4.1includes a discussion of the health effects of chromium and Section 2.5.3
for environmental considerations for hexavalent chromium solutions. [118, ESTAL, 2003],.
[116, Czech-Republic, 2003]

2.5.13.3 Anodising of magnesium, titanium, tantalum and niobium

[73, BSTSA, ] Anodising of magnesium gives the best protection for abrasive wear. The
coatings are relatively porous and contain crystalline phases like Mg(OH)
2
and MgO. The oxide
layer can be 25 ]mor more.

Anodising of the DOW-17 type is dark grey or green and has very good adhesion. Alternating
current is preferable. The coating has an attractive appearance and is well suited for being
coated by for example a transparent paint. The oxide layer is soluble in the acid electrolyte
meaning that the deposition rate decreases until a steady state condition is reached. Thorough
rinsing is required and if the parts are not to be painted a sealing in 50 g/l Na
2
Si
4
O
9
at
93 - 100 C for 15 minutes can be performed.

Anodising of the HAE type gives the hardest oxide and is well suited for protecting against
abrasion. It has very good adhesion and gives good protection against corrosion. The coating is
from light to dark brown, depending on alloy and thickness and the best properties are achieved
by using alternating current. Dipping in a Na
2
Cr
2
O
7
/NH
4
HF
2
solution at 20 - 30 C for
40 - 60 seconds can seal the coating.

Environmental considerations
High temperature, toxic and aggressive electrolyte (for DOW-17) require good ventilation.

2.5.13.4 Phosphoric acid anodising

Phosphoric acid anodising is being increasingly used as a preparative treatment for subsequent
applications of organic or plated coatings. Phosphoric acid anodising produces a relatively thin,
porous oxide that is used for bonding, painting, plating and printing applications. [132, Sheasby
and Pinner, 2002].

This process has been originally developed by the aerospace industry and is presently used
mainly as a pretreatment for preparing adhesively bonding aluminium structures in the
aerospace industry, for painting aluminium in architectural applications and for the printing
industry.

Phosphoric acid anodising produces a porous, hydration-resistant oxide and increases fracture
toughness. The anodic coatings resulting from phosphoric acid anodising have a high porosity
compared to those produced with other processes.

2.5.14 Colour anodising on aluminium

[118, ESTAL, 2003]

Aluminium can be coloured in many shades and colours in conjunction or after sulphuric acid
anodising and is normally referred to as colour anodising. Normally colouring methods are
identified as dip dyeing, electrolytic dyeing or two-stage colour anodising, self-colouring
process, or integral colour process. [118, ESTAL, 2003]. There are four methods [3, CETS,
2002, 45, France, 2003].
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 67
2.5.14.1 Immersion colouring

This is the most widely used colouring method with a large range of dyes giving good light
resistance. The anodised aluminium workpieces or substrate are immersed in a water-based
organic or inorganic dye solution before sealing. The pores in the oxide layer adsorb the dye and
then sealing is carried out to achieve durability. For colouring the oxide, thickness depends on
the type of product and on the colour required. For a good corrosion protection and weather
resistance, at least 15 ]mminimum is needed. [118, ESTAL, 2003, Sheasby, 2002 #132].

Environmental considerations
Some organic dyes may require additional waste water treatment.

2.5.14.2 Electrolytic colouring

The anodised aluminium is placed in an acid solution containing metal salts and an alternating
current (AC) is applied. This deposits oxide of the other metal which penetrates 1 - 5 ]m deep
into the pore of the alumina, with the residual oxide layer remaining on top. The film obtains a
colour characteristic of the metal salts used. The metal salt most commonly used in Europe is
tin. For special applications, nickel, cobalt and copper can be used. Tin sulphate gives shades
from light bronze to black depending on the process time, of 0.5 to 15 minutes. A major use is
for architectural panels. Electrolytic and immersion colouring can be combined to form new
shades. [73, BSTSA, ] [118, ESTAL, 2003]

Environmental considerations
The other metals used may require treatment in a waste treatment plant prior to discharge.

2.5.14.3 Interference colouring

Interference colouring is a special technique based on the electrolytic colouring principle. The
appearance is produced by interference effects between two light-scattering layers: the
electrochemically deposited metal layer at the bottom of pores and the aluminium
oxide/aluminium interface beneath.

2.5.14.4 Integral colouring

With integral colouring, the aluminium oxide layer is coloured itself during the anodising
process. Colouring occurs either by anodising in a solution of special organic acids or by normal
anodising in sulphuric acid of special aluminium alloys with substances that are not oxidised
such as Al-Si or Al-Fe-Mn. The oxide layer appears with a colour ranging from light bronze,
through dark bronze to black, depending on the layer thickness. This technique has almost
entirely been replaced by electrolytic colouring [73, BSTSA, ]

2.5.15 Sealing following anodising

Sulphuric acid anodising is normally followed by a sealing process. Sealing improves the
corrosion and stain resistance of the oxide layers. It also prevents organic dyes from leaching
out and improves the light fastness. Sealing may be carried out in hot or cold processes. (For
architectural applications see ref [138, QUALANOD, 1999, ESTAL, 2003 #118])

Chapter 2
68 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.5.15.1 Hot sealing

With hot sealing, the pores in the oxide layer are closed by hydrating the aluminium oxide to
boehmite: the pores are close by the increased volume of the boehmite structure. The sealing
process is carried out by dipping the anodised parts in hot or boiling (minimum 95- 96 C)
deionised water for three minutes per ]m thickness. Sealing with steam achieves the same
effect. [118, ESTAL, 2003, CETS, 2003 #115]

2.5.15.2 Cold sealing

Sealing methods at lower temperatures have been developed. So-called mid-temperature sealing
processes are also available operating at about 60 C. These are not based on the hydrothermal
conversion of aluminium oxide for closing the pores, but by the use of nickel salts, such as the
fluoride or silicate. In the past, in the European market, there was some concern about long
term-properties such as light fastness and corrosion resistance. However, such processes have
now been proven and accredited for outside use (see Qualanod [138, QUALANOD, 1999,
ESTAL, 2003 #118])

There are also processes working at 25 - 35 C. Advantages with cold processes are lower
energy consumption and shorter process times[73, BSTSA, ].

Environmental considerations
Hot sealing may also require ventilation and have very high energy consumption. However, this
can be reduced by covering the tanks or with proper insulation [159, TWG, 2004]. There is
lower energy consumption with cold sealing [73, BSTSA, ].

2.5.16 Phosphating layer conversion coatings

[38, Ullmann, 2002/3, 71, BSTSA, ]Phosphate coatings are the most widely used conversion
coatings and probably the most widely used surface treatment. They are used to treat steel,
aluminium and zinc for:

cold forming: this involves very high surface stresses and phosphating is used in all
types of cold forming operations, i.e. drawing of wire, tube, or profile; deep drawing;
cold heading, cold extrusion, cold forging. These applications are described in the
reference [86, EIPPCB, ]
coil coating: steel strip electroplated with zinc is phosphated in the process line to
improve formability in subsequent drawing operations, such as steel can forming, as
well as for corrosion resistance and subsequent paintability, see Sections 2.9.6 and
2.9.8.9. Hot dip galvanised steel strip is discussed in [86, EIPPCB, ]
rustproofing: heavy zinc and manganese phosphate coatings retain a protective oil film
and provide substantial corrosion prevention, e.g. for nuts, screws, bolts, and tubes
bearing surface lubrication: manganese phosphate improves the retention of lubricant
and shortens running-in periods. It is used for pinions, camshafts, pistons, gears, and
valves
paint base: phosphating enhances the adhesion and corrosion protection of paints, see
[90, EIPPCB, ]
electrical insulation: phosphate layers can be used to coat the silicon steel sheets
forming the cores of electric motors, generators or transformers. A phosphate coating of
1 - 6 m thickness is sufficient insulation to prevent eddy currents.

There is a wide variety of phosphating processes, but the most important are alkali (iron) and
zinc phosphating. The surface weight of layers is 0.05 5 g/m
2
.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 69
Methods of application
The phosphating solutions are generally applied by spraying or by immersion depending on the
number, size, and shape of the parts to be treated. The type of application may lead to
differences in the composition and morphology of phosphate coatings. Coiled strip is also
coated by the roll-on, dry-in-place process, in which phosphating solution is applied to the strip
and, without rinsing, is dried to form the phosphate coating, see Section 2.9.6.

Phosphating requires workpieces or substrates to be degreased and pickled see Section 2.3.
[116, Czech-Republic, 2003] Activation prior to phosphating may be with hot water or with
special proprietary titanium or manganese phosphate dispersions to induce the formation of a
fine-grain phosphate coating in the subsequent step. Final rinsing may be with deionised water
or passivating chemicals based such as Cr(VI) and Cr(III) compounds. Rinsing with water is
needed between the processing stages as described in Section 2.4.

Overall environmental considerations for all phosphating processes
Effluents may require pH control and may [124, Germany, 2003] contain nickel, manganese, as
well as zinc (according to solution make-up), which can be dealt with in a typical waste water
treatment plant. Anions that may be of concern include nitrite and fluoride, which may require
additional treatment.

Sludges formed in the process solutions require removing as wastes as part of the solution
maintenance.

Health and environmental concerns have instigated the development of:

nitrite-free processes with hydroxylamine, nitroguanidine, or hydrogen peroxide as
accelerators
nickel-free processes
chromium-free after-rinses based on organotitanium, inorganic zirconium, or polymeric
compounds
effluent-free phosphating lines using ultrafiltration for cleaning, hydrogen peroxide
acceleration in phosphating, and precipitation plus ion exchange for chromium-free
after-rinses, without compromising the performance of the subsequently painted parts.

2.5.16.1 Alkali phosphating

This is mainly used when corrosion protection does not have to satisfy stringent requirements.
For steel substrates, the solutions (pH 4 - 6) consist of acid alkali phosphates, free phosphoric
acid, and small amounts of additives; oxidising agents (e.g. chlorates, chromates, or nitrites),
condensed phosphates (e.g. pyrophosphate or tripolyphosphate), and special activators (e.g.
fluorides or molybdates). The first reaction is the pickling reaction which produces Fe
2+
ions
from the substrate (steel). These ions react with phosphate ions from the solution to form
sparingly soluble iron phosphate that precipitates and adheres strongly to the metal surface. Iron
phosphating processes may not require acceleration. The coating weight varies with the bath
composition. Coatings formed on ferrous surfaces contain iron oxides and phosphates. Iron
phosphating solutions normally contain surfactants for cleaning and oily surfaces may thus be
treated in one step (so-called cleaner-coater).

On zinc surfaces, zinc phosphate layers are formed in an analogous reaction sequence.
Aluminium is usually treated with solutions containing fluoride; thin, complex coatings are
formed that contain aluminium, phosphate, and fluoride. The baths are adjusted to a
concentration of 2 15 g/l. Treatment may be by spraying, flooding, or dipping. The bath
temperature is normally 40 - 70 C, but can be lowered to 25 - 35 C with special bath
compositions. Treatment times are 5 - 10 seconds (spraying of strip material) and 1 - 3 minutes
(spraying or dipping of individual parts). Iron phosphating includes both thin-coating
Chapter 2
70 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
(0.2 - 0.4 g/m
2
) and thick-coating methods (0.6 - 1.0 g/m
2
). The colour of the layers is blue-
green, but may be reddish iridescent. The surfaces become more matt and grey with increasing
coating weight.

2.5.16.2 Zinc phosphating

Zinc phosphating is primarily used for the surface treatment of steel and zinc (or zinc coatings
on steel) as well as composites of these metals with aluminium. Application may be by spraying
or immersion. Essential constituents are zinc, phosphate ions, and an oxidizing agent, often
sodium nitrite. The pH value is between 2 and 3.5. Concentrations vary considerably; additives
such as nitrate, fluoride, silicofluoride, nickel ions, or manganese ions are common.

The following is an example of a process suitable for the phosphating of steel sheets as a
pretreatment prior to painting:

Zn
2+
1.2 g/l, Ni
2+
1.0 g/l, H
3
PO
4
+ H
2
PO
4

15 g/l, and NO
2

0.1 g/l

A pH of 3.2 is achieved with sodium hydroxide. The process is usually carried out at up to
95 C. For cold forming applications total concentrations may well be ten times higher.

Typically, the phosphating reaction may be broken down into five steps:

Pickling reaction
Part of the metal surface is dissolved by the acid:

Fe + 2H
+
YFe
2+
+ H
2
for Fe or Zn + 2H
+
YZn
2+
+ H
2
for Zn

The phosphating of aluminium requires fluoride ions to attack surface oxides which only slowly
dissolve in phosphoric or nitric acid:

AlOOH + 3HF YAl
3+
+ 3F
-
+ 2H
2
O; Al + 3H
+
YAl
3+
+ 3/2H
2
Acceleration
The pickling reaction is accelerated by oxidising agents called accelerators, which also prevent
the evolution of excessive amounts of molecular hydrogen thus minimising hydrogen
embrittlement: [159, TWG, 2004]

H
2
+2O
x
Y2HO
x
; Fe
2+
+ H
+
+ O
x
YFe
3+
+ HO
x
for Fe

Complexation
When coating aluminium, sufficient fluoride ions must be available for complexation of surplus
Al
3+
ions as, in concentrations as low as 3 mg/l, they prevent the formation of zinc phosphate
coatings. If different metals including aluminium are to be treated, the use of fluoride-free
phosphating solutions may allow phosphating of steel or zinc without coating the aluminium:

Al
3+
+6F
-a
YAlF
6
3-
for Al

Coating formation
Metal dissolution in the pickling reaction results in a significant increase of the pH value close
to the metal surface. Consequently, the equilibrium constant for the precipitation reaction is
exceeded and zinc phosphate is precipitated as the metal surface offers favourable nucleation
sites. Once the whole metal surface is covered, the reaction ceases:

3Zn
2+
+ 2H
2
PO
4
-
+ 4H
2
O YZn
3
(PO
4
)
2.
a4H
2
O+ 4H
+
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 71
2Zn
2+
+ Fe
2+
+ 2H
2
PO
4
-
+4H
2
O YZn
2
Fe(PO
4
)
2
4H
2
O+ 4H
+
Sludge formation
Dissolved iron and AlF
6
3-
ions from the pickling reaction do not accumulate in the phosphating
solution but are precipitated as iron(III) phosphate or trisodium hexafluoroaluminate,
respectively. When treating galvanised surfaces and in spraying processes, relatively small
amounts of tertiary zinc phosphate sludge are formed as well. Nitrate-accelerated processes
often do not involve sludge formation. Iron(II) nitrate accumulates until equilibrium is reached
between iron dissolution and drag-out.

Fe
3+
+H
2
PO
-
4
YFePO
4
+2H
+
for Fe; or AlF
6
3-
+3Na
+
YNa
3
AlF
6
for Al

The sludges formed must be removed either periodically or continuously.

Pre-paint processes
Zinc phosphating processes carried out prior to painting can be classified as high zinc or low
zinc processes. High zinc processes operate at 3 - 4 g/l Zn
2+
and low zinc processes at
0.7 - 1.5 g/l Zn
2+
, the upper limit for dip applications. Low zinc concentration, i.e. high
phosphate to zinc ratio, improves corrosion protection. Coatings on steel produced by low zinc
processes consist mainly of phosphosphyllite and show superior paint-base performance to the
high zinc processes with their hopeite coatings, such as stone chipping resistance and wet
adhesion on galvanised substrates. Performance has further increased with the introduction of
trication processes, which contain zinc, nickel, and manganese both in solution and in the
coating. These processes have become commonplace in, for example, the automotive industries.
[38, Ullmann, 2002/3]

For powder coatings, iron phosphate often gives optimum results [90, EIPPCB, ].

Low temperature processes for cold forming
These are accelerated by nitrate, and the iron(III) concentration in the bath is limited to 5 - 8 g/l
by oxidation with air, preferably continuously in a separate reaction tank. The operating
temperature has thus been lowered by about 30 C to 50 - 60 C, and the phosphating tank
remains virtually free of sludge.

2.5.16.3 Manganese phosphating

This is performed by dipping only, and iron(II) nitrate is often used for acceleration.

2.5.17 Chromium conversion coatings

[3, CETS, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003]
Chromium conversion coatings are used to enhance corrosion protection on various metal
surfaces, including electroplated zinc and cadmium, zinc die castings, tin, aluminium,
magnesium and magnesium alloys, copper, brass and bronze, nickel, silver and stainless steel.
Without such protection, zinc electroplated steel surfaces have a strong tendency to white (zinc
oxide) corrosion. Often referred to as chromating because the process originally used only
hexavalent chromium as the chromate ion (Cr
2
O
4
2-
), it is used in nearly all areas of the steel
processing industry and is an essential post treatment step in zinc plating. The wide spread use
of the original yellow chromating was increased by the development of further layer systems of
blue and black chromating, which have decorative effects in addition to corrosion protection.

Phospho-chromating exists with both hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and trivalent chromium
(Cr(III)) versions and is used in the treatment of aluminium prior to painting [118, ESTAL,
2003].

Chapter 2
72 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The layer thicknesses of the chromating coats lie between 0.1 and 2 ]m. They are well suited as
adhesion mediators for subsequent treatment with paint layers or synthetic material coatings.
Lubricants can be included in order to decrease the friction values of treated pieces.

The corrosion protection of the chromium coatings can be increased by further sealing layers,
described in topcoatings, Section 2.5.17.7.

The typical composition of solutions are chromic acid, dichromate, chloride, fluorides,
sulphates, borates, nitrates and acetates, which are used in different combinations and
concentrations to produce different colours and layer characteristics.

Overall environmental and health considerations
For health issues relating for Cr(VI), see Section 1.4.4.1.

For Cr(VI) aerosols and effluents, see Section 2.5.3.

2.5.17.1 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings

Conventional processes are all based on the use of acid oxidising solutions, the oxidant being
hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)). The protection mechanism is based on the dissolution of the
Cr(VI) present at the surface of the film. The presence of chromate works locally to inhibit any
corrosive action on the exposed metal surface.

2.5.17.2 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings on electroplated zinc layers

Coatings are applied by chemical reaction in aqueous solutions. Numerous proprietary
conversion coating processes are available, producing decorative and protective films with
colours ranging from clear through iridescent yellow to brass, brown, olive drab and black.
Broadly, the deeper the colour the better the corrosion resistance.

2.5.17.3 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings on copper, brass and bronze

Chromate solutions to treat copper and copper alloys are prepared with proprietary materials.
The treatment not only passivates the surface but also provides effective chemical surface
polishing. Consequently, chromate treatments on copper and copper alloys are used both as a
final finish and as a whole or partial substitute for mechanical buffing prior to nickel or
chromium plating. The passivity obtained is effective in reducing corrosion and sulphide
tarnishing.

Environmental considerations
Chromate bright dipping solutions are preferred because of their non-fuming nature.
Increased effluent treatment may be required because of the dissolution of copper in the process
bath.

2.5.17.4 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings on aluminium

Chromate or phospho-chromate conversion films, ranging from clear yellow for chromate to
green for phospho-chromate [118, ESTAL, 2003] can be produced on aluminium. The film
colour depends on the immersion time, pH, solution concentration and, to some extent, on the
composition of the alloy to be treated. The main use is as a pretreament prior to painting or
powder coating, although it is used for components in aerospace, electronics and other
applications [118, ESTAL, 2003, CETS, 2003 #115].
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 73
The ability of the treatment to provide corrosion resistance without a corresponding loss of
conductivity is particularly useful for electronic applications.

Solutions containing low Cr(VI) are available (Personal communication, ESTAL).

Environmental considerations
Low Cr(VI) solution reduce drag-out and typical waste water treatment requirements.

2.5.17.5 Chromium (VI) conversion coatings on magnesium and its alloys

Because of their corrosion characteristics, chromate treatment is still the only common method
to treat magnesium and magnesium alloys. This treatment is often applied at the raw material
source, in order to ensure good storage characteristics. Chromate treatment is also used to
prepare magnesium and magnesium alloys for subsequent plating, particularly for nickel
autocatalytic plating.

There are two typical process methods in use:

pickling is mainly used to protect parts during storage and shipment
dichromate treatment provides maximum corrosion protection and improved adhesion
properties for paint.

2.5.17.6 Trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) conversion coatings on aluminium and
electroplated zinc

Trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) conversion coating processes were first developed about 20 years
ago as a more environmentally acceptable alternative to hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI))
processes, mainly on electroplated zinc. These conversion coating systems and treatment baths
do not contain hexavalent chromium and therefore avoid the environmental or health problems
associated with hexavalent chromium. [118, ESTAL, 2003]

Trivalent chromium-based blue coating processes can produce the appearance traditionally
associated with hexavalent processes over acid, cyanide or alkaline non-cyanide zinc plating
systems.

Trivalent chromium conversion coating processes usually produce clear or blue conversion
coatings only. Recently, trivalent chromium passivates producing a higher film thickness and
greater corrosion resistance have been developed that perform well in comparison with
iridescent hexavalent chromium passivation.

At least one process is available with coatings that are Cr(VI)-free. They have a unique light
green, yellow iridescent colour and provides up to 120 hours to first white corrosion when
barrel processing and up to 240 hours when rack processing. These numbers vary depending on
the process and if a topcoat or sealer has been added. This passivation can be used on all zinc
plating (acid, alkali non-cyanide and cyanide) as well as zinc alloys (Zn-iron, Zn-cobalt and Zn-
Nickel). It is claimed that treated parts can be baked at 200 C for four hours and still retain up
to 90 % of their corrosion protection abilities.

Black Cr(VI)-free passivations have also been developed which, with sealers, give the
comparable corrosion test results [124, Germany, 2003].

However, the thickest conversion coatings, olive drab, that give greater corrosion protection for
zinc can only be achieved using hexavalent chromium conversion coating processes.

Chapter 2
74 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Compared to hexavalent chromium conversion coating processes, the trivalent chromium
conversion coating:

can provide equal or more corrosion-resistant for the same colour finish [124, Germany,
2003]
does not require a running in period for freshly prepared passivation solutions
the colour and performance of the processes are more uniform throughout the solution
life
solution is normally at least twice that of conventional hexavalent chromium and
limited by impurities rather than consumption of the active chromium compounds,
resulting in less solution disposal
cannot produce the range of colours and corrosion resistance given by hexavalent
coatings
requires more process control
may require a top coating or sealer to produce similar corrosion performance to darker
Cr(VI) passivations.

Environmental considerations
There are no specific health and safety considerations for Cr(III).

Reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is not required during waste water treatment.

Cr(III) processes generally contain approximately ten times the concentration of chromium to
Cr(VI) baths. The zinc removal from zinc plating is twice that of Cr(VI). Cr(III) may therefore
generate more waste in waste water treatment [113, Austria, 2003].

Cr(III) processes with a similar corrosion resistance to Cr(VI) processes are usually heated baths
with a higher energy consumption than the corresponding Cr(VI) processes [73, BSTSA, ].

2.5.17.7 Topcoatings for chromate conversion coatings

Both hexavalent and trivalent chromate conversion films are porous and adsorbent in nature and
their thickness is very limited. Their protective action can be enhanced by applying a
subsequent top coating film, either organic (e.g. methacrylate, see electropainting, Section
2.5.10 and lacquering, Section 2.5.11) or inorganic (e.g. metasilicate) and/or mixed inorganic-
organic. These topcoatings have additional functions: a self-healing effect, providing protection
against local mechanical scratches due to improper handling during processing; a substantial
reduction in the quantity of Cr(III) leaching out from the treated surface, and a reduction in
friction parameters [124, Germany, 2003]. Top coating protection is mainly due to the physical
barrier of the coating itself.

2.5.18 Metal colouring

[3, CETS, 2002] It is possible to obtain a wide range of shades and colours over different metals
by heat treatment, chemical dip or electrolytic treatment. These processes are used for brass,
copper and steel parts. The most commonly used system is chemical dipping. The results
obtained will depend more on the practice of the operation and process parameters than on the
formula used. Originally, sulphide and polysulphide solutions in alkaline media using sodium,
ammonium or barium salts from room to high temperatures were used. It is now more usual to
use solutions containing metallic ions (copper, selenium, molybdenum, etc.) in an acid medium
and at room temperature.
Small articles may be coloured in bulk, then proud surface areas relieved by tumbling with an
abrasive media, see Section 2.3. All sulphide treated workpieces require wet or dry scratch-
brushing and must be protected by a topcoat of clear lacquer.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 75
Environmental considerations
Depending on the precise formulations used, effluents may need to be pretreated separately
prior to typical waste water treatment.

2.5.19 Bright dipping

For all substrates including aluminium, this term is synonymous with brightening and
chemical polishing, see Section 2.5.21 [118, ESTAL, 2003, 159, TWG, 2004].

2.5.20 Chemical blacking oxide coatings

Immersion-type chemical oxidation coatings are used mainly for appearance, as a paint base, or
for their oil-retention characteristics. [38, Ullmann, 2002/3]

Environmental considerations for all chemical blacking processes
Fumes from processes containing alkali and chromium may require extraction and possibly
scrubbing. Scrubber effluents may require treatment in a waste water plant.

Rinsing waters may require treatment for pH. Other materials such as nitrogen-containing
compounds, other oxidising agents and sulphides may require additional treatments to those
found in a typical waste water treatment plant.

Steel
Steel may be blackened in a high temperature bath containing 480 840 g/l of a mixture of
about 75 wt -% sodium hydroxide and 25 wt -% sodium nitrate. The solution is operated at the
boil between 121 149 C. Instead of 25 wt -% sodium nitrate, a mixture of 12 wt -% sodium
nitrate and 13 wt -% sodium nitrite may also be used.

Lower boiling points are obtained by including various additives containing sulphur.
The resulting oxide coating is somewhat less corrosion-resistant because of the inclusion of iron
sulphide in the film. Some of the sulphide-modified materials may also be used to blacken
stainless steel.

Following thorough rinsing, the oxide film is normally coated with an oil, wax, or lacquer.

Stainless steel
Stainless steel can also be blackened in molten sodium/potassium dichromate at about 370 C
provided the parts are not adversely affected by the high temperature. The resulting oxide has
good corrosion resistance, and the procedure is covered by military specifications.

The Inox process, dipping in chromic acid and sulphate at 60 90 C can be used, and
chromium-nickel steel can be coloured black by dipping in NaOH/NaNO
2
at 125 - 130 C [113,
Austria, 2003].

Copper
Copper may be blackened in a bath containing 120 g/l of a mixture of 75 wt -% sodium
hydroxide and 25 wt % sodium chlorite at 93 100 C. The black copper (II) oxide produced
has a fuzzy appearance. On bright finished parts, this fuzzy nap disappears when lacquer is
applied, restoring the lustrous appearance, or it may be laid down (not removed) by gentle
buffing or tumbling in sawdust or other soft abrasives (see Section 2.3).

Chapter 2
76 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Brass
Brass may be blackened in the same solution but may not respond, depending on the zinc
content and metallurgical history. Activation may be carried out by immersion in a bath
containing 120 g/l of a mixture of 85 wt -% sodium hydroxide and 15 wt -% sodium chlorite
operated at 93 - 100 C for 5 - 10 min to dezincify the surface, after which the blackening bath
will usually function normally.

Aluminium
Aluminium may be given an oxide coating by immersion by a number of different processes
including the Alzac and Juratka processes. Electrolytic processes (anodising) are generally
preferred.

2.5.21 Brightening

In the brightening of steel, concentrated nitric acid is used to form a very clean surface. Note
that this process forms nitrous gases in the exhaust gas. [104, UBA, 2003]

Copper and brass are brightened by oxidising a surface layer.

Aluminium and some of its alloys can be brightened by chemical or electrochemical processes
for special applications such as lighting and decorative finishes [118, ESTAL, 2003, 132,
Sheasby and Pinner, 2002].

Phosphoric acid pickles have specific uses such as chassis parts and bicycle frames. It is usually
used at a concentration of 10 - 15 %, at temperatures of 40 - 50 C and sometimes as high as
80 C.

Metal surfaces must be degreased thoroughly. Poor results, such as uneven attack or stained
surfaces after brightening, are frequently due to insufficient pre-degreasing.
Environmental considerations
Spent brightening solutions may require treatment for low pH and possibly metal content prior
to disposal as effluent. Alternatively, they may be disposed of as liquid wastes.

Acid fumes, particularly those containing NO
X
may require extraction, possibly with treatment.
2.5.22 Etching Alkaline etching of aluminium

The most frequently used method for etching aluminium is aqueous solutions of caustic soda,
with or without other additives. It can be used for general cleaning purposes where oxide, grease
of subsurface detritus may be removed. With more prolonged etching, it can produce stain or
matt finish for nameplates or decorative architectural work; or for deep engraving and chemical
milling. It is a relatively cheap and easy method of etching but the details can be exceedingly
complex.

Solutions for decorative etching may contain from 4 - 10 % or more caustic soda, used at
40 - 90 C, possibly with a wetting agent to disperse grease and give a light foam blanket.

The most common are long-term use etch processes operated on a never-dump basis. These
processes contain special additives, which stabilize the aluminate solution. Etch rate must be
controlled to get a constant etch finish. Important parameters are: temperature, free sodium
hydroxide, aluminium and additive content.

Alkaline etches with increased etch rates are used to remove the anodised film from aluminium
jigs before the next jigging.

[118, ESTAL, 2003, 132, Sheasby and Pinner, 2002, 138, QUALANOD, 1999].
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 77
Environmental considerations
Spent alkali etch baths may be re-used in municipal waste water treatment [159, TWG, 2004].

2.5.23 Chemical milling

[47, France, 2003] Chemical milling is a process used to remove metal on workpieces by
dissolution in a caustic or acid bath without an external source of energy (mechanical or
electrical). Metal is removed off the whole surface of the part dipped in the milling bath
provided this surface is in contact with the solution. Areas to remain are masked. The speed of
the chemical dissolution is low, processing 0.5 to 3 mm/h compared with mechanical processes.
The thickness removed is almost constant all over the surface, but with a roughness created
which varies with the process used.
The most important uses are on aluminium alloys for the aeronautical and aerospace industry. It
is generally used on sheets that have been previously curved and where it is necessary to save
weight. Chemical milling can also be used on titanium alloys, stainless steel and some special
alloys with a nickel, cobalt or magnesium base.

Process chemistries used are:

for aluminium: caustic soda with additives (sodium gluconate, sodium sulphide)
for titanium: hydrofluoric acid (20 50 g/l) with nitric acid (50 70 g/l)
for stainless steel: hydrochloric acid with nitric and phosphoric acid.

The main control parameters for aluminium and aluminium alloys are:

concentration of the bath: from 100 to 150 g/l of free NaOH
temperature: 80 C for older processes, types up to 110 C for high speed processes
concentration of dissolved metals: 70 to 90 g/l Al
composition of the alloy chemically milled.

All these parameters affect the speed of processing, the thickness regularity and roughness of
the finish.

Generally, the entire surface is not milled. In order to prevent milling on some areas it is
necessary to mask those areas with protecting layers such as neoprene. The usual technique is to
mask the whole part and then remove the mask from the areas to be milled. The mask is cut by
scalpel or laser beam.

A typical process sequence is:

solvent degreasing
alkaline etching
rinsing
pickling (e.g. sulphochromic pickling)
rinsing
drying
masking
removal of mask on surface to be treated
attack
rinsing
surface passivation: (e.g. sulphochromic or nitric acid)
rinsing
removal of mask
quality control.
Chapter 2
78 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Environmental issues
The main problem for this treatment is the large quantity of sludge due to the dissolved metals.
The concentration of the chemical milling bath is generally kept below 70 g/l of aluminium and
so used solutions are discarded beyond this concentration. Normal waste water treatment may
be used and the principle component of the sludge is NaAlO
2
.
2.6 After treatment activities

2.6.1 Drying using hot water

[3, CETS, 2002] After all wet processing operations have been completed, the workpieces or
substrates need to be quickly and effectively dried in order to avoid staining and corrosion. The
simplest method of drying is by immersing the components in hot water for a few seconds and
then allowing them to dry-off in the air.

The disadvantage of hot water drying is the high energy loss from the tank surface. It is,
however, common practice in surface treatment shops moving jigs manually (and hence low
throughput of workpieces).

The water temperature needs to be carefully controlled. The temperature must be limited to
60 C for plated plastic components in order to avoid deformation. Zinc plated and passivated
components also are limited to 60 C to avoid dehydration of the coating and loss of corrosion
protection of the passivate film. Chrome plated components can be dried at up to 90 C.
Deionised water is usually used to prevent drying stains. Some plants use a continuous trickle
feed of deionised water, the water overflow is then used to provide a feed for a preceding
cascade rinsing system. The hot water stage may also be a final rinsing step.
Environmental considerations
Energy efficiency can be low.

2.6.2 Drying using hot air

Drying in automated jig plants is most easily accomplished on automatic lines using hot air. The
jigs are placed in a tank-shaped drier at the end of the process line; the tank has the same
dimensions as the vats in the line to fit into the transporter system. Hot air is evenly re-
circulated from the top to the bottom of the tank at temperatures of 60 80 C. Hot air escaping
from the top of the drier tank makes the equipment thermally inefficient.
In some cases, such as the new thick film passivations or to reduce drying times, it is necessary
to heat the substrate or workpieces to 80 C and higher. The temperature of the air circulating in
the tank-shaped driers then needs to be above 100 C. The air is normally heated by circulation
or heat-exchangers using steam or hot oil. Direct heating systems are an alternative, using a
special gas burner with an open gas flame in the circulating air. The burning gas heats the air
directly with an efficiency of nearly 100 % of the energy input [124, Germany, 2003].

Environmental considerations
There is a potential for poor energy efficiency if air is not retained and recirculated effectively.

2.6.3 Drying using air knives

There is a growing use of localised air drying by means of precision nozzles or air knives that
is more energy efficient than hot air tank drying. See Section 2.3 for a description.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 79
2.6.4 Heat treatment for hydrogen de-embrittlement

Heat treatment to avoid the hydrogen embrittlement formed in pickling, cathodic cleaning, and
the electrodeposition of metal where the current efficiency is less than 100 %, or in chemical
deposition (phosphating). The temperature and time of the de-embrittlement process depend on
the substrate [159, TWG, 2004].

Environmental considerations
Energy consumption [124, Germany, 2003].

2.7 Common techniques for water and waste water treatment,
process solution maintenance and materials recovery

There are a number of techniques that are used for treating water and water-based solutions, and
are widely used in the surface treatment of metals for:
treating incoming water supplies
treating waste waters prior to discharge or for re-use
process solution maintenance
in-process materials recovery. This may also serve as process solution maintenance

The basic techniques only vary slightly according (e.g. choice of resins for ion exchange) to the
application, they are briefly described here and more fully in Chapter 4. They are well described
elsewhere, and some are especially useful when considering closing the loop for process
materials, see Section 4.7 [162, USEPA, 2000].

2.7.1 Filtration

There are many types of filtration. On the smaller scale they start with cellulose (paper) sheets
usually clamped in filters (sometimes layered with activated carbon or other absorbents), and
cartridges. On a larger scale, sand filters are used for cleaning raw water or polishing effluents,
and belt filters or filters presses are used with higher solids applications such as waste water
sludges, often in conjunction with coagulants.

Environmental considerations
Pumps (with an associated energy demand) are usually require for filtering, although in some
cases (such as some sand filters) gravity is sufficient.

The filter medium, with the filtrate is usually disposed of as a waste.

2.7.2 Absorption techniques

Activated carbon is used to adsorb unwanted organic substances formed from breakdown
products in a solution. It can be added to the solution on batch basis and then filtered out, or it
can be used in a layered filter system.

Granulated polypropylene felt or other lipophilic filter media can be placed in filter housings
and used for removal of oils by adsorption.

Polymer filtration uses chelating, water soluble polymers to selectively bind target metals in
aqueous streams.

Chapter 2
80 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Environmental considerations
Activated carbon will also remove a portion of the useful organic chemical additives, such as
brighteners and these will need replenishing.

The absorbent material along, with the retentate and filter medium, is usually disposed of as a
waste, although precious metals may be recovered.

2.7.3 Crystallisation

Various evaporation and cooling systems are used to bring solutions to a super-saturation point
where solid crystals form and can be separated from solution.

Environmental considerations
Energy requirements for heating or cooling

2.7.4 Atmospheric evaporation

Atmospheric evaporation occurs when solutions are heated. As a basic technique, it reduces the
volume of process solutions and allows drag-out to be returned or fresh chemicals to be added
to the process solution. It can be increased by using air agitation and/or using an evaporator.
The evaporator may be filled with a packing material to increase the air-to-water evaporation
surface. Evaporators are often used with a condenser to recover distilled water.

Environmental considerations
Evaporators can often beneficially use the heat from the solution when the process is self-
heating, e.g. from the electrical current passed. The heat lost then assists with cooling the
solution.

2.7.5 Vacuum evaporation

Reduced pressure and elevated temperature combine to separate constituents with relatively
high volatility from constituents with lower volatility, e.g. removal of water from an acid plating
solution. Evaporating the process solution (e.g., acid distillation) from contaminant phases with
higher volatility can also purify process solutions. Multiple stages may be used to increase
separation purity, to reduce energy requirements, or to accomplish multiple phase separations.

Environmental considerations
Energy requirements for heating and evacuation to vacuum conditions.

2.7.6 Electrolysis plating out

Transition metals can be removed from waste water streams by plating out on high surface area
electrodes in metal recovery cells. It can also be used in combination with ion exchange as a
means to concentrate metal ions, see Section 2.7.8.

Environmental considerations
At concentrations below about 10 mg/l the metal deposition becomes very inefficient with 10 to
100 times the theoretical energy requirement actually needed for metal deposition.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 81
2.7.7 Electrolysis oxidation

It is possible to oxidise both unwanted organic by-products and metals in solutions, such as
Cr(III) to Cr(VI). This can be done with or without a ceramic membrane, depending on current
density conditions.

2.7.8 Ion exchange resin

Ions in solution are selectively removed by exchanging positions with resin-functional groups.
The direct ion exchange treatment of waste water provides a means of concentrating multivalent
cations for subsequent treatment on column regeneration or by plating out (see Section 2.7.6) [3,
CETS, 2002], [159, TWG, 2004].

Environmental considerations
Ion exchange requires energy for pumping during use and regeneration, and also requires
extensive chemical dosing; the chemical requirement for metal ion capture is generally three to
four times the theoretical requirement.

2.7.9 Electrodeionisation

Ions are removed using conventional ion exchange resins. An electric current is used to
continuously regenerate the resin, instead of regeneration chemicals.

2.7.10 Acid (resin) sorption

Acid (resin) sorption is configured similarly to ion exchange. Resins are designed to selectively
adsorb mineral acids while excluding metal salts (adsorption phase). Purified acid is recovered
for re-use when the resin is regenerated with water (desorption phase).

2.7.11 Ion exchange liquid/liquid

Ionic contaminants are removed from process solutions into immiscible primary liquid
extraction solutions. Secondary liquid extraction solutions are used to remove the contaminants
and to regenerate the primary extraction solution.

So far, the only application is ammoniacal etch solutions that are regenerated by removal and
recovery of copper, with a closed loop extraction solution system.

2.7.12 Membrane filtration

There are various types of membrane filtration and their use depends on their pore size. These
systems are pressurised because of the small pore size.

microfiltration (MF) is a membrane filtration technology that uses low applied pressures
with pore sizes in the range of 0.02 to 10 microns to separate relatively large particles in
the macromolecular to micro particle size range (approximate molecular weights
>100000)
ultrafiltration (UF) passes ions and rejects macromolecules (0.005 to 0.1 micron) and
removes organics from process solutions
nanofiltration (NF) is used for larger size rejection than reverse osmosis (rejects
molecules larger than 0.001 to 0.008 microns).

Chapter 2
82 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Environmental considerations
Energy is used in pressurising the systems.

2.7.13 Reverse osmosis

Reverse osmosis, effectively filtration of ions through a semi-permeable membrane at high
pressure, provides an alternative means of concentrating metal impurities for subsequent
removal. This approach can be capital intensive and any solids, together with organics, have to
be removed prior to treatment.[3, CETS, 2002].

Environmental considerations
The technique runs at high pressures with a subsequent energy demand.
2.7.14 Diffusion dialysis

Diffusion dialysis is a membrane separation process that typically uses an anionic exchange
membrane to transport acid anions and protons from waste acid solutions into deionised water
streams (for treatment in waste water treatment plant) and the acid is recovered.

2.7.15 Membrane electrolysis

Membrane electrolysis uses one or more ion-selective membranes to separate electrolyte
solutions within an electrolysis cell. The membranes are ion-permeable and selective. Cation
membranes pass cations such as Cu and Al, but reject anions. Anion membranes pass anions,
such as sulphates and chlorides, but reject cations

Environmental considerations
The electrolytic reactions may generate hazardous gases, depending on the solutions.

2.7.16 Electrodialysis

Anions and cations are removed from solutions with an applied electric field in cells with
alternating anion- and cation-permeable membranes

2.8 Barrel processing

The use of barrels is described in 0 and 2.2 above.
Processing is carried out as described in the generic jig Sections 2.4 to 2.6. The following
sections refer specifically to activities normally associated with barrel treatments.

2.8.1 Workpiece preparation

Deburring and tumbling, as well as degreasing workpieces for barrel treatment by centrifuging
are described in Section 2.3.

2.8.2 Core activities

Core activities are the same as for jigs or racks, except chromium and anodising where barrel
use is impossible. Workpieces should be small and without flat areas to prevent the flat surfaces
adhering during treatment. This can cause marking, or in some cases burning, from uneven
surface treatment [121, France, 2003].

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 83
2.8.3 Drying for barrelled components

Barrel plants use centrifugal drying or hot air drying depending upon the type of component.
Centrifugal drying is effective and energy efficient.

2.9 Continuous coil large scale steel

[73, BSTSA, , 86, EIPPCB, ]. The coating of large steel coils is traditionally associated with the
production of the coil. Coils weigh up to 32 tonnes and can be up to 2080 mm wide [119,
Eurofer, 2003].

Finished cold-rolled steel (pickled, cold-rolled, annealed and tempered) is a material with
mechanical characteristics that make it suitable for use in many industrial applications.
Unfortunately, it suffers the major disadvantage of low corrosion resistance. The use of surface
treatments to improve the corrosion resistance of the coiled steel substrate is described in this
document.

Electroplating is a major surface treatment for large scale steel coil production. Other surface
treatment options of printing and painting are discussed in [90, EIPPCB, ].

The electrolytic coating procedure is fundamentally the same as that used in jig and barrel
processes, even using similar solution chemistries. It is also preceded by the same type of
pretreatments such as cleaning and pickling, and followed by post-treatments including layer
conversion techniques such as chromating and phosphating. The specific activities for steel coil
are described below.

There are two key differences for large-scale steel coil:

the size and nature of the coils and the equipment used to handle and process them.
These require:
o coil handling equipment
o loading and unloading systems (entry and exit loopers)
o equipment to keep the coil in process at the right tension and flat (to prevent
coil distortion and contact with anodes)
o edge trimming to size.
the continuous nature of the substrate, with only small thickness and limited width
changes. This allows the use of some techniques that cannot be used for jig and
barrel systems (which have constantly changing shapes of components), such as:
o brushes to assist with activities such as degreasing and wringer rolls to reduce
process solution drag-over
o the continuous nature of the strip and the type of plant layout also lends itself to
the widespread use of other techniques such as spray rinses and electrostatic
oiling which are used less frequently in other transport systems.

A typical process outline is described in Figure 2.11. Details for specific process lines are
described in the following sections.
Chapter 2
84 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Loading, e.g.
entry handling,
entry looper,
tensioning
Pretreatment e.g.
cleaning,
pickling
Electroplating e.g.
tin, chromium,
zinc/zinc alloy,
lead
Post-treatment e.g.
layer conversion
(chromium passivate,
phosphate), oiling,
brightening
Unloading, e.g.
exit looper and
handling
Figure 2.11: Outline of typical coil coating process

2.9.1 Entry equipment

The reception of coils, the uncoiling and welding of the coil end with the start of the next coil
allows for a continuous process. The entry equipment involves the following:

transport between the storage of uncoated steel coils to the uncoilers by means of a
transfer chain, fork lift or an air-cushion vehicle
uncoiling of the strip (including uncoiler, magnetic strip and pressure rolls)
the entry looper guarantees that the strip can go on moving at a constant speed in the
processing section even during welding when the strip end is held still at the entry
section. The looper stores coil by running it through a series of vertical or horizontal
loops. These are then used when the coil end is held still for welding on a new coil
shearing of coil tails and scrap collection
seam welding of the coil end with the start of the next coil
continue strip thickness measurement
tension leveller: used at the entry section or prior to any point where flatness is essential
such as running between anodes or edge trimming knives. This flatness is corrected
continuously by traction and flexion.

Environmental considerations
Power consumption can be assisted by maintenance of correct settings and ensuring bearings are
free running.

2.9.2 Rinsing and drag-out

These activities are described in Section 2.4. Specific control techniques for coil processing are
described for the individual processes.

2.9.3 Pretreatment

2.9.3.1 Degreasing and cleaning

The coiled blackplate is usually contaminated with fatty residues (oil and grease) and mill dirt
(amorphous carbon or abraded iron fines) left over from the rolling process. It is essential that
the surface of the steel strip is free of these impurities to ensure the entire surface is exposed to
the treatment activities to ensure strong adhesion of the coatings is achieved.

Aqueous systems are now standard, and solvent degreasing is no longer used.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 85
The cleaning is usually a combination of soak and electrolytic activities, see Section 2.3.
Cleaning solutions are usually based on sodium hydroxide, phosphate or polyphosphates and
wetting and complexing agents.

Electrolytic cleaning.
Impurities such as grease, oil, amorphous carbon or abraded iron fines may exist in the
depressions of the surface roughness after the degreasing treatment. It is essential that these
impurities are removed to ensure a strong adherence of the coating and it is achieved by
electrolytic cleaning.

The uncoiled strip is polarised, either:

directly - where the strip passes over a conductor roll, and then travels between two
pairs of mild steel electrodes. The current passes from the conductor roll via the strip
and electrolyte to the electrodes, or
indirectly - grid electrodes where the steel strip travels between two pairs of mild steel
plates which form two electrodes of opposite polarity. The current passes from one pair
of electrodes via the electrolyte and the strip to the other pair of electrodes.

The electrolysis of the alkaline solution produces the release of H
2
gas at the cathode and of O
2
gas at the anode. The polarity of the electrodes is inverted after each coil or after a certain time
to avoid polarisation.

Environmental considerations
See Section 2.3.4 and the individual processes.

Where oily waste is collected from the activities, it is usually treated off-site.

2.9.3.2 Pickling

Although the strip should be free of surface oil and dirt as it leaves the cleaner rinse, oxides
formed during the various stages of steel processing are not removed. The purpose of acid
pickle is to remove these oxides and lightly etch the strip to present as clean a steel surface as
possible to the plating section. Strip pickling can be carried out by immersion, spraying or more
commonly by electrolysis, with the same electrical arrangements as for cleaning, i.e. contact
rollers or grids. See also Section 2.3 and [86, EIPPCB, ].

Lead anodes are used because of the 50 g/l (max) concentration of the sulphuric acid electrolyte.

Electrolytic pickling (bipolar action) in neutral electrolyte (Na
2
SO
4
) may also be used in treating
steel coil [113, Austria, 2003].

Environmental considerations
See Section 2.3.6.

2.9.4 Coating activities electroplating

The materials commonly used for electroplating steel strip because of their special
characteristics are: tin, chromium, zinc, copper, lead and some of their alloys. Electrolytic
reactions are described at the start of Chapter 2.

Chapter 2
86 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Electrolytic cells for continuous steel coil
The cleaned and pickled strip is fed through electrolytic cells. The electrolytic cells are the heart
of an electrolytic line. The choice, design and sizing of the other line components and supplying
sections are dependent on the choice of the electrolytic cell and its components.

The main components of a continuous coil electrolytic cell are:

conductor roll: this gives the steel strip a negative electrical charge. The voltage is
transformed into current by means of a rectifier. The negative pole of the rectifier is
connected to the carbon brushes of the conductor roll
press roll: provides good contact and high electric conductivity between conductor roll
and steel strip
anode: repels the positive ions towards the steel strip (cathode). The positive pole of the
rectifier is connected to the anode
sink roll: turns the steel strip by 180
wringer rolls or squeeze rolls: minimise the drag-over (drag-in) into the next cell
edge masks: prevents zinc edge overthrow (build-up of zinc preferentially at the edge of
the coil where charge density is highest)
conductor roll cleaning device: cleans the surface of the conductor roll to avoid surface
defects on the steel strip.

The choice of an electrolytic cell depends on the industry applications the producer intends to
supply, on the layer thickness they intend to deposit and on the capacity they intend to install.
Electrolytic cell type is a function of four main parameters:

cell geometry
current density
electrolytic solution type
anode type.

Cell geometry
The three main types of cell geometry are:

Vertical cell
The two strip sides may be coated simultaneously in one cell. On entry to the cell the strip runs
from top to bottom, from the conductor roll through one pair of guiding rolls and the first anode
pair down to the sink roll. From there it runs to the exit side, upwards through to the second
electrode pair and wringer rolls and on to the next conductor roll.

Conventional cells are filled in with electrolyte and the sink roll and the two pairs of anodes are
submerged in the electrolyte bath. In the Gravitel cell, the electrolyte enters via a weir in the
narrow gap between the insoluble anode and the strip, holding only a small amount of
electrolyte in contact with the strip. In this case, neither the anodes nor the sink roll are
submerged in the electrolyte.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 87
Strip
Sink roll
Conductor roll
Anode
Press roll
Wringer roll
Electrolyte
Figure 2.12: Vertical cell

Radial cell
Only one side of the strip may be coated at a time in one cell. On entry to the cell, the strip runs
from the top to the bottom, from the conductor roll through one pair of wringer rolls down to the
sink roll. From there the strip runs to the exit side, upwards through the wringer rolls and on to
the next conductor roll. Only the lowest part of the sink roll is plunged in the electrolyte bath.

In a variant, the carousel cell, the top rolls have the function of deflector rolls while the sink
roll, equipped with a metallic winding, combines the functions of deflector roll and conductor
roll.

Sink roll
Conductor roll Strip
Electrolyte
Anode
Press rolls
Figure 2.13: Radial cell

Horizontal cell
Both strip sides may be coated simultaneously in one cell. The strip runs horizontally through
the cells. At the entry to the cell, the strip leaves the conductor roll and runs through one pair of
wringer rolls, then between a pair of anodes and from there to the exit side, onwards through a
another pair of wringer rolls to the next conductor roll. The electrolyte is continuously injected
between the two anode pairs, thereby only holding a small amount of electrolyte in contact with
the strip at any one time.

Chapter 2
88 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Press roll
Wringer roll
Electrolyte
Anode
Conductor roll
Figure 2.14: Horizontal cell

Current density
Installations normally working at low current density can be differentiated from those normally
working at high current density. The current density will depend on the main industrial
application, the normal metal thickness required and the normal steel substrate thickness. Table
2.1 shows thicknesses for zinc and zinc alloy coil coating applications. A high current density
allows a thicker metal layer to be plated onto the steel substrate with a shorter anode length.

Current
density
(A/dm
2)

Main
industrial
applications
Zinc layer
thickness
(Mm)
Steel thickness
minimum
(mm)
Electrolyte
relative speed
(m/sec)
60 to 120 Vehicle 5 to 12 0.5 1.0 to 4.0
30 to 90 White goods 2.5 to 3.5 0.3 <1.0
30 to 90 Others 2.5 to 3.5 0.3 <1.0
Table 2.1: Zinc and zinc alloy layer thickness as a function of industry application

High current density cells are equipped with systems such as electrolyte injection devices to
realise a high relative electrolyte speed (electrolyte speed versus strip speed). These systems
assure a sufficient supply of metal ions to the polarisation layer at the steel strip surface to carry
the current.

Electrolyte bath
These are described for each process separately, see Sections 2.9.8, 2.9.9 and 2.9.10.

Anode type and gap
Two families of anodes are available: soluble anodes and insoluble anodes, see the introduction
of Chapter 2, Electrolytic cells and reactions.

The gap between the anode and the steel strip differs as a function of the cell geometry and of
the maximum steel strip width.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 89
Electrolytic cell
Minimum gap
(mm)
Vertical 16 to 26
Vertical gravitel 7 to 14.5
Radial 7 to 15
Horizontal 10 to 20
Table 2.2: Gaps between anode and steel strip for different electrolytic cell types

2.9.5 Coating activities oiling

A wet film of oil is applied to the surface by spray, by wringer rolls or by an electrostatic oiler.
This provides a coating for improving protection against white rust (oxide layers on zinc
plating) corrosion. It can also act as a lubricant film to minimise subsequent damage by
abrasion, to facilitate sorting and to aid in subsequent lacquering and printing operations.

2.9.6 Layer conversion activities

In order to prevent surface damages and flaws during storage and transportation, such as white
rust (zinc corrosion) caused by water condensation where there is insufficient air access, the
deposited layer may be subsequently phosphated (see Section 2.5.16), passivated with a
chromate treatment (see Section 2.5.17) and/or oiled prior to recoiling (see Section 2.9.5). These
layers also significantly improve the processing properties, during these and subsequent
processes, such as painting or deep drawing.

2.9.7 After treatment activities

2.9.7.1 Drying

The strip is dried by means of hot air drying devices. The hot air temperature depends on the
process stage. The drier device is usually situated at the end of the post-treatment; the same type
of device is used for the phosphate and the chromate sections. See Section 2.6.2.

Environmental considerations
Energy efficiency according to type of drier and the installation.

2.9.7.2 Unloading - exit looper

The exit looper allows the strip end to remain at standstill in the exit section during the cutting
of a completed coil. It stores sufficient coil for the strip to continue moving at a constant speed
in the processing section. Construction and operation is the same as for an entry looper, with the
coil running in the reverse direction.

Environmental considerations
Power consumption which will be minimised by maintenance of correct settings and ensuring
bearings are free running.

Chapter 2
90 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.9.8 Continuous electrolytic zinc or zinc nickel plating activities

This is the electrolytic deposition of a thin layer of pure or alloyed zinc onto the surface of a
steel strip substrate.

On continuous electrolytic zinc plating line, the cold rolled, annealed and tempered steel strip is
passed continuously through degreasing and pickling pretreatments, then through a series of
electrolytic cells containing a zinc electrolyte. It is then passed through one or more
post-treatments, either layer conversion such as chromating or phosphating, or through an oiling
step.

Plating lines layout may vary in design. As an example, Figure 2.15 shows a typical layout of a
continuous electrolytic zinc plating line.

Entry
equipment
Degreasing
section
Entry
looper
Tension
leveller
Polisher
section
Plating
section
Pickling
section
Electro
degreasing
Inspection
section
Exit
looper
section
Chromate
rinsing
section
Phosphating
section
Side
trimmer
Marker
section
Oiler
section
Exit
equipment
Cold rolled,
annealed and
tempered coil
Zinc electroplated coil
Figure 2.15: Schematic of an electrolytic zinc coating line layout

2.9.8.1 Entry equipment

See Section 2.9.1.

2.9.8.2 Degreasing

Degreasing of steel strip surface is by means of both chemical action (alkaline agent) and
mechanical action (spray and brushes).

The cleaning process involves the following steps:

alkaline degreasing via immersion or by spraying. This may be coupled with brushing
rinsing with water and brushing between intermediate rinsing tanks
drying.

The degreasing and rinsing sections may be in horizontal or vertical tanks.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 91
Alkali degreasing
A typical horizontal spray degreasing section for the treatment of oiled coils consists of three
successive stages:

stage 1: spray nozzles and brushes
stage 2: spray nozzles
stage 3: spray nozzles and brushes.

Cascade degreasing has the advantage of achieving a high cleaning rate using only a small
amount of degreasing solution. Degreasing is performed in counter-flow direction to the steel
coil movement, which means that clean degreasing solution is used in the third (final) stage
where it becomes slightly contaminated. This degreasing agent is used for cleaning in the
second (more contaminated) stage and subsequently in the first (most contaminated) degreasing
stage. The degreasing agent overflows between any two stages are controlled by means of wring
rollers.

Section 2.9.3.1 describes typical chemical degreasing systems. In steel coil coating, the
degreasing agent is usually an alkaline containing phosphate (a non-siliceous solution)
containing mainly sodium hydroxides, orthophosphates and surfactant compounds with a
concentration of 5 to 40 g/l, a temperature between 60 and 85 C and a pH of about 13. The
degreasing solution may be used first in the electrolytic degreasing section and be moved to the
chemical degreasing stage to replace the spent chemical degreaser.

Environmental considerations
The use of cascade degreasing minimises the amount of raw materials and water used.

When the cleaning solution has reached the maximum oil content it is regenerated by
centrifuges.

The solution may be used first in the electrolytic degreasing section.

Fumes generated in degreasing and brushing are normally collected, scrubbed and treated prior
to release.

Spent degreasing agent is sent to waste water treatment before release.

The oily waste is treated off-site.

Spray
degreasing
Spray
degreasing
Spray
degreasing
Brushes
Brushes
Figure 2.16: Spray degreasing and brushing

Chapter 2
92 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Rinsing
See Section 2.4. The alkaline degreaser is completely removed by cascade rinsing in three
stages. Cascade rinsing has the advantage of achieving a high cleaning rate using only a small
amount of rinsing water. Rinsing is performed in a counter-flow direction to the movement of
the steel strip: the clean water is used in the third stage where it consequently becomes
contaminated. This slightly contaminated water is then used for cleaning in the second stage and
subsequently in the previous rinsing stage. The water overflows between two stages are
controlled by means of wring rollers. The rinsing equipment involves the following steps:

stage 1: spray nozzles and brushes
stage 2: spray nozzles
stage 3: spray nozzles.

The process solution in the first stage is demineralised water at a temperature of 70 to 85 C.

Quality control techniques are used to determine the oil content in the water which gives the
required standard of cleaning with minimum water usage. During processing, when the oil
content in the water has reached this maximum allowed concentration, the water is sent to waste
water treatment before discharge.

Environmental considerations
Countercurrent rinsing optimises process efficiency and minimises use of heated demineralised
water.

Used water is treated to remove oil prior to discharge.

Water vapour and/or fumes generated in rinsing and brushing are collected and injected into the
rinsing tanks.

Figure 2.17: Spray rinsing

2.9.8.3 Drying

The degreased strip is dried by means of a hot air drying device. The hot air temperature lies
between 100 and 120 C.
Environmental considerations
Energy efficiency.

2.9.8.4 Entry looper and tension leveller

See Section 2.9.1

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 93
2.9.8.5 Electrolytic degreasing

The final degreasing of steel strip surface is carried out by means of chemical (alkaline agent)
and mechanical (sprays and H
2
and O
2
gases bubbles generated by electrolysis at the strip
surface) actions, see Section 2.3.8.

The electrolytic degreasing section involves the following steps carried in cells:

alkaline degreasing by an electrolytic system
rinsing with water, possibly coupled with brushing.
The degreasing and rinsing sections may be in horizontal or vertical tanks.

The electrolytic degreasing is carried out by the electrolysis of the alkaline solution releasing H
2
gas at the cathode and O
2
gas at the anode. The polarity of the electrodes is inverted after each
coil or after a certain period in order to avoid polarisation. The solution drag-out to the next
stage is controlled by means of wringer rollers.

The degreasing solution is usually the same as that used in the degreasing section. Once the
solution has reached a certain oil level it is re-used on the degreasing section (cascade use). The
operating temperature of the solution lies between 60 and 85 C.

Environmental considerations
Re-use of the solution in the more contaminated degreasing section is possible.

Alkali fumes generated in electrolytic degreasing cells are usually collected, scrubbed and
treated prior to release to maintain a healthy working environment and to prevent corrosion of
equipment and substrates.

Strip
Sink roll
Electrode
Alkaline bath
Conductor roll
Figure 2.18: Electrolytic degreasing

Chapter 2
94 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Rinsing
Cascade rinsing in two stages completely removes the alkaline solution. Cascade rinsing has the
advantage of achieving a high cleaning rate using only a small amount of rinsing water. Rinsing
is performed in the counter-flow direction (i.e. the water flows in the opposite direction to the
coil). This means that clean water is used in the last stage where it consequently becomes
contaminated. This slightly contaminated water is used for cleaning in the second stage and
subsequently in the previous rinsing stage. The water drag-over between two stages are
controlled by means of wringer rolls. The rinsing equipment involves the following steps:

stage 1: spray nozzles and brushes
stage 2: spray nozzles.

Demineralised water having a temperature of 70 to 85 C is used in the first stage.

Environmental considerations
Use of countercurrent rinsing to minimise use of heated demineralised water.

Water vapour and alkali fumes generated in rinsing and brushing are usually collected and
injected in the rinsing tanks.

When the water has reached the maximum allowed oil content commensurate with process
quality, it is sent to waste water treatment before release.

2.9.8.6 Pickling

Pickling removes any oxides formed during the various stages of steel processing and prepares a
reactive steel surface for the plating section. For further information, see [86, EIPPCB, ].

Coil pickling can be carried out by spraying, or immersion with or without electrolysis.
Typical pickling sections involve the following steps:

stage 1: pickling
stage 2: rinsing.
Spray pickling
Two types of pickling solution may be used:

sulphuric acid at a concentration within a range of 10 to 60 g/l with a temperature range
of 25 to 60 C.
hydrochloric acid at a concentration within a range of 100 to 150 g/l with a temperature
range of 20 to 40 C.
Both the temperature and the acid concentration are dependent on the available pickling time
(which is a function of the contact length and the maximum strip speed).

Environmental considerations
Fumes generated in pickling are usually collected and scrubbed prior to release. In some lines,
the contaminated water of the scrubber is treated together with the fumes from the electroplating
cells in an evaporator and both the concentrate and the evaporated water are returned to the
process.

Spent pickling solution is sent to waste water treatment before release.

Spray rinsing
The same system is used as for degreasing (see Section 2.9.8.5).
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 95
Strip
Sink roll
Spray
Acid bath
Figure 2.19: Pickling section

2.9.8.7 Electroplating

In this section, thin deposits of pure or alloyed zinc are electrolytically deposited onto the
surface of a steel strip substrate. A typical plating section involves the following steps:

stage 1: plating through several electrolytic cells
stage 2: rinsing.

Sections 2.9.4 discuss the process and describe types of electrolytic cell. Current density for
various zinc and zinc alloy thicknesses, and the industries they are used in are set out in Table
2.1.

Types of electrolyte bath
Electrolyte baths in continuous electrolytic zinc plating lines are predominantly acid-based.
Alkaline-based electrolytes are no longer in common use. Electrolytes can be sulphate-based or
chloride-based. The sulphate-based bath is used with soluble and insoluble anode processes.
The chloride-based bath is only used with soluble anodes as chlorine gas is generated with
insoluble anodes. In both baths, ionic additions are made to increase the conductivity of the
electrolyte bath (e.g. sodium sulphate, aluminium sulphate, sodium chloride). Buffer additions
are made to stabilise the pH (e.g. CH
3
COONa).
Typical sulphuric base electrolytic bath compositions are:

zinc 70 - 120 g/l
free H
2
SO
4
3 - 25 g/l
Na
2
SO
4
0 - 100 g/l
pH 1.0 - 3.0 pH units.

Anodes types
These are generally described at the start of Chapter 2. For this process:

soluble anodes: the zinc anodes are fixed on a supporting rail and, as they are consumed
during the process, they are displaced from the entry side rail to the exit side rail
insoluble anodes: two materials are used for the anode plate: a plate substrate in
titanium coated with a thin layer of tantalum oxides or iridium oxides and a plate in lead
alloyed with Sn or with Ag and In.

Chapter 2
96 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Rinsing step
The coil is then rinsed to completely remove the electrolyte from the strip surface. Also, in
some cases where the coil is coated only on one side, the rinse may be used to pickle the zinc
residues on the non-coated side. Rinsing can be carried out by immersion or by cascade
spraying, and in horizontal or vertical tanks depending on the available surface. The same
cascade principles described in the degreasing section are applied here, see Section 2.9.3.1.

Demineralised or fresh water is used, with a temperature of between 20 50 C and a pH 0.3 to
3 (among other control parameters).

When the water has reached the maximum allowed contaminant (electrolyte) content
determined by quality control, it is sent for waste water treatment before discharge. In some
lines, the contaminated water is treated in an evaporator. The evaporated water can be re-used
for rinsing and the concentrate re-used in the process electrolyte.

Environmental considerations
Counter-flow cascade rinsing can maximise the rinse efficiency and minimise the use of hot
demineralised water.

Re-use of the water outputs distilled from evaporators.

2.9.8.8 Strip polisher

The strip polisher is used to clean the tarnished/oxidised uncoated side of the strip and to
remove any stray coating particles which may have been deposited. When producing single
sided coated material, some lines omit the polishing technology.

A typical polishing section involves the following stages:

stage 1: polishing
stage 2: rinsing
stage 3: drying.

Polishing
Brushes are used to polish the cold reduced surface on the uncoated side. Demineralised water is
used. The metal particulates are filtered from the used water.

Environmental considerations
The used water is sent to waste water treatment before release.
Rinsing
The strip is passed through a hot water rinse to remove any debris, before being dried. Rinsing
can be carried out by immersion or by cascade spraying, in horizontal or vertical tanks
depending of the available surface. The same principles as described for the degreasing section
are applied. See Section 2.9.8.2.

Environmental considerations
The used water is sent to waste water treatment before release.

Drying
The polished strip is dried by means of a hot air drying device. The hot air temperature lies
between 100 and 120 C. The drier device is usually situated at the end of the post-treatment;
the same type of device is used for the phosphate and the chromate sections. See Section 2.6.

Environmental considerations
Heat efficiency and losses.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 97
2.9.8.9 Phosphating

This process forms a high quality light phosphate coat with the hopeite chemical structure
which is widely used in the automotive industry and for household appliances. Phosphating can
improve the performance of the zinc-coated strip with regard to drawability, corrosion
resistance and subsequent paintability. See Section 2.5.16.

The strip is treated after zinc coating using spray banks in a two-stage process:

stage 1: activation
stage 2: phosphating.

Activating
The first stage consists of spray of a titanium refiner, which provides activation sites for the
second stage of phosphate coating. The activation solution circulates in a closed loop. The pH
lies in a range of 8 to 10, and the temperature is maintained below 40 C. Spent (used, out of
specification) solution it is treated in the waste water treatment section.

Phosphating
Phosphate coatings are described in Section 2.5.16. A phosphate coat of approximately 1 - 1.8
g/m
2
is applied. The phosphate system used can either be single or tricationic, depending on
customer requirements. The hopeite crystal Zn
3
(PO
4
)
2
.4H
2
O incorporates approximately 1 % Ni
and 5 % Mn. A refiner is added to ensure that the phosphate crystals deposited are small,
uniform and tight, which enhances the performance of the coating.

Following phosphating, the strip is rinsed in a spray of dilute chromate solution to form a
chromate seal. This seal further enhances the corrosion performance of the phosphate coating.
The strip is then dried.

The phosphate solution circulates in a closed loop at a temperature below 40 C.

Environmental considerations
See Section 2.5.16.

Spent solution is treated in the waste water treatment section.

Effluents may contain traces of nickel and manganese.

2.9.8.10 Full chromating and chromate rinsing

This is described in Section 2.5.17. A typical chromating section involves the following steps:

stage 1: chromating
stage 2: rinsing
stage 3: drying.

Chromating
Full chromating or chromate rinsing of the strip after zinc coating is achieved using spray
banks. Chromate rinse or passivation is a spray treatment with solvents containing chromic
acids. A coat of 10 35 mg/m
2
per side is applied. During passivation, Cr(VI) is largely
converted to Cr(III). The strip is treated with solutions between 0.5 2 % of chromium and at
temperatures below 40 C. The chromate solution circulates in closed loop.

Environmental considerations
General health and environmental issues for chromium passivation are described in Sections
1.4.4.1 and 2.5.17.

Chapter 2
98 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Spent (used, out of specification) solution may be treated in a typical waste water treatment
plant or disposed of as hazardous waste.

Rinsing
Rinsing can be carried out by cascade spraying in horizontal tanks. The same principles as
described for the degreasing section are applied. See Section 2.9.8.2

Environmental considerations
The used water is sent to waste water treatment before release.

Drying
The chromate rinse strip is dried by means of a hot air drying device. The hot air temperature
lies between 100 and 120 C which is necessary for the chemical reaction of the excess Cr(VI)
with the solution additives to become Cr(III).

Environmental considerations
Heat efficiency and losses.

Anti-finger marking section
This provides a chromate coating for improving protection against white rust corrosion. This
coating has the advantage of not showing fingerprints, which is critical for some customers.

A typical chromating section involves the following steps:

stage 1: coating. The chromate coating is applied via a roller coater system, similar to
that used in paint lines
stage 2: drying. The wet coating is passed through an air oven to dry.

Environmental considerations
The coating is dried in place with no rinsing, so no effluent arises.

Heat efficiency and losses may need to be addressed for the oven.

2.9.8.11 Oiling

A wet film of oil is applied on the surface of the strip, see Section 2.9.5. The oiling coat is
between 0.25 3 g/m
2
/side, applied in an electrostatic oiler, with the oil circulating in close
loop.

2.9.8.12 Exit looper

See Section 2.9.7.2

2.9.9 Continuous electrolytic tin plating activities

Mild low carbon steel can be coated with tin either with equal or different thicknesses on either
side, and in a range of thicknesses.

On a continuous electrolytic tin coating line, the blackplate strip is passed through cleaning and
pickling pretreatments, then through a series of tanks containing a tin electrolyte. This process
electrolytically deposits a light layer of pure tin onto the strip, which may be subsequently
reflowed, then passivated and oiled prior to recoiling.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 99
Plant layouts vary in design; some modern lines now incorporate a side trimming unit prior to
pretreatment. Figure 2.20 shows a typical layout of a continuous tin coating line.

Entry
equipment
Blackplate coil
Tinned coil
Entry
looper
Tension
leveller
Side
trimmers
Drag-out
section
Plating
section
Pickling
section
Cleaning
section
Marker roll
assembly
Flow-melt
section
Passivisation Oiler
Exit
equipment
Instrument
stand
Inspection
Exit
looper
Figure 2.20: Schematic of a tin coating line layout

2.9.9.1 Degreasing and cleaning

As with other surface treatments, tin plating requires appropriate preparation of the substrate as
poor surface condition can lead to inadequate adhesion of the tin or even dewetting during the
remelting operation. See Sections 2.3 and 2.9.3.1. Cleaning solutions are usually proprietary
mixtures of polyphosphates, sodium hydroxide and wetting agents. The chemical action of the
bath is enhanced by electrolytic treatment. Concentrations range from 7 to 50 g/l and the
solution is operated at a typical temperature of about 90 C maintained by circulating the
solution through a heated reservoir storage tank. Additions of water and cleaning compound are
made as required. Figure 2.21 shows a typical cleaner section with rinsing.

The strip is polarised using one of two methods:

directly - where the strip passes over a conductor roll, and then travels between two
pairs of mild steel electrodes. Current passes from the conductor roll via the strip and
electrolyte to the electrodes
indirectly - by grid electrodes where the steel strip travels between two pairs of mild
steel plates which form two electrodes of opposite polarity. Current passes from one
pair of electrodes via the electrolyte and the strip to the other pair of electrodes.

Rinsing
Rinsing is as thorough as possible to avoid contamination of the pickle liquor pretreatment by
the cleaning solution. It is carried out by spraying hot water, typically between 150 400 l/min.

Environmental considerations
Alkali fumes generated during cleaning are typically collected and scrubbed prior to release.

Spent cleaning agent and waste water from rinsing can be treated in a typical waste water
treatment plant.
Chapter 2
100 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 2.21: Schematic of a cleaner section

2.9.9.2 Pickling

See Section 2.9.3.2. Lead anodes are used because of the 50 g/l (max) concentration of the
sulphuric acid electrolyte. The acid is deliberately not heated, but the process current induces an
equilibrium temperature of 25 to 40 C, depending on operating conditions.

+
Section
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Spray headers
Grid to grid
electrodes
Electrolytic
tanks
Rinse
tanks
From cleaning
rinse tank
Carrier rolls
Figure 2.22: Schematic of a pickler section

Environmental considerations
Acid fumes generated during pickling are usually collected and scrubbed prior to discharge.
Spent acids and rinse waste water are sent for waste water treatment prior to discharge.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 101
2.9.9.3 Tin plating

There are two widely used tinning processes:

the Du Pont process which represents 20 % of worldwide tin plate production. It has
the ability to accept high current densities. However the electrolyte composition is
complex, with high chloride and fluoride contents making it highly aggressive to plant
materials
the Ferrostan process is the most widely used, with between 75 and 80 % of
worldwide tin plate production. This is due to the use of less hazardous and corrosive
chemicals.

Other electrolytes are based on tin sulphate, tin fluoroborate or tin methyl sulphonate [113,
Austria, 2003].
The plating section of a tinning line consists of several rubber-lined steel vertical tanks arranged
in tandem. Each tank contains a rubber driven sink roll at its base and two chromium plated
copper conductor rolls above the electrolyte surface. Current is transferred from the roll to the
strip so that the strip becomes cathodic. Soluble tin anodes are hung from bridges across the vats
into the plating electrolyte. Anodes are cast from electrorefined tin which is typically more than
99.85 % pure.

Figure 2.23: Schematic of a plating tank vertical cell

The plating electrolyte consists of stannous sulphate, phenolsulphonic acid (PSA) and an
organic addition agent. The stannous sulphate provides an initial source of tin ions in solution;
the PSA makes the solution highly conductive and the addition agent ethoxylated alpha-
naphthol sulphonic acid (ENSA) aids uniform and consistent tin deposition. This is essential for
making the plate bright at after the later flow-melting stage.

Chapter 2
102 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Typical composition and temperature of tin electrolyte to ensure good plating conditions is:

stannous tin 25 45 g/l
phenol sulphonic acid (PSA) 20 27 g/l
ENSA 1.5 - 6.0 g/l
at temperatures of 30 55 C.

The plating electrolyte is circulated through heat-exchangers, the rate of circulation being high
enough to maintain a constant plating temperature for all coating weights.

2.9.9.4 Drag-out

After plating, the strip goes through a series of drag-out and rinsing operations.

At the drag-out tank, electrolyte is spray-rinsed with a dilute solution of PSA and a tin
compound, and then returned to the electrolyte circulation tank. This tank is connected to an
evaporator and the dilute electrolyte is concentrated by evaporation then recirculated back to the
plating tank.

The exit squeeze rolls on the drag-out recovery tank leave the optimum amount of electrolyte on
the strip required for fluxing of the tin coating during melting. The film only needs to be dried
before the strip enters the flow-melting or brightening unit which is accomplished by passing
the strip through a series of hot air jets.

On high speed lines, a second drag-out recovery unit is provided to increase the dilution ratio.
This means a recovery ratio of more than 90 % of the drag-out electrolyte is accomplished.

Environmental considerations
Dragged over plating solution can be concentrated and returned to the plating process.

Acid fumes generated during plating and drag-out may be collected by an extraction unit and
are usually scrubbed prior to discharge.

2.9.9.5 Differential marking

Differential coatings are shown by marking one side of the strip usually with a solution of
sodium dichromate. This is printed onto the strip in a pattern of diamonds, circles or, more
commonly, lines. The solution is dried onto the strip and after melting will leave a dull, non-
lustrous finish in the areas that have been in contact with the printer.

Environmental considerations
As for other chromium coatings, see Section 2.9.8.10.

2.9.9.6 Reflow tin brightening

The tin coating deposited on the strip has a dull matt appearance. Reflowing or flow melting is
the process used to give a bright lustrous finish. The strip is heated to above 232 C (the melting
point of tin) and then quickly cooled to solidify the coating. Melting is achieved by resistive
heating (applying a voltage between two conducting rolls supporting the strip), supplemented by
induction heating (which provides 20 % of the total energy).

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 103
Figure 2.24: Schematic of flow-melt section

The mixed resistive and inductive heating makes it easier to obtain stable melting conditions,
avoiding certain cosmetic coating defects.

Environmental considerations
Energy efficiency and energy losses.

2.9.9.7 Passivation treatments

Passivation is carried out by a chromating treatment, see Section 2.5.17, in order to reduce the
thickness of tin oxides formed during remelting. The treatment electrolytically produces a layer
containing chromium which prevents subsequent oxidation in air and also improves adhesion of
the paint layer.

The operation is performed in a solution of sodium dichromate

Chapter 2
104 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 2.25: Schematic of passivation treatment

Environmental considerations
General health and environmental issues for chromium passivation are described in Sections
1.4.4.1 and 2.5.17.

Spent (used, out of specification) solution may be treated in a typical waste water treatment
plant or disposed of as hazardous waste.

2.9.9.8 Oiling

Prior to recoiling the treated coil, a thin film of lubricant is applied to the tin plate surface. This
film minimises subsequent damage by abrasion, facilitates sorting and aids subsequent
lacquering and printing operations.

A pure grade of either dioxyl sebacate (DOS) or acetyltributyl citrate (ATBC) is used. The oil
can be added by two methods:

electrostatically, where a negatively charged oil mist is driven away from similarly
charged repeller plates onto the surface of the strip
emulsion oiling, where a thin, uniform oil film is applied by flooding the surface of the
tin plate with a dilute oil-in-water emulsion.

The total oil levels on the strip range typically from 6.0 to 12.0 mg/m
2
.
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 105
2.9.10 Continuous electrolytic chromium plating activities (electrolytic
chromium coating of steel ECCS)

This is also known as tin-free steel: a low carbon, mild steel, coated equally on both sides with a
complex layer of metallic chromium and chromium hydroxides. The processes are described in
general in Section 2.5.3, along with the health and environmental issues. Figure 2.26 shows a
typical process line layout and Figure 2.27 gives a cross-section through a line. The chromium
plating of the steel strip is performed electrolytically in a chromic acid bath. The coating is
applied equally to both sides as a complex layer of chromium metal and chromium oxides. The
overall process is similar to the electrolytic tin process the steel strip is passed through the
entry section of the line, cleaned, pickled and then treated electrolytically in a solution
containing chromic acid, rinsed thoroughly, dried, oiled and then recoiled.

Entry
equipment
Blackplate coil
Chrome coated coil
Entry
looper
Tension
leveller
Pickling
section
Cleaning
section
Side
trimmers
Pre-dip
tank
Plating
section
Drag-out
tank
Exit
equipment
Exit looper
Plating
rinse
Figure 2.26: Chrome coating line layout

2.9.10.1 Degreasing and cleaning

Cleaning is performed electrolytically in an alkaline bath (see Section 2.3.8) and sodium
hydroxide is generally used at concentrations of typically 50 to 90 g/l. Wetting agents and
chelating agents are also added to the cleaning agent to improve cleaning performance.

sodium hydroxide 60 - 65 %
sodium phosphate 30 - 35 %
wetting agent 0 - 2 %
chelating agent 2 - 5 %.

Chapter 2
106 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Electrodes
Electrodes are made of mild steel plates. The polarity of the strip can be selected from anodic,
cathodic or any combination of the two. The strip is polarised either:

directly, where the strip passes over a conductor roll, and then travels between two pairs
of mild steel electrodes. Current passes from the conductor roll via the strip and
electrolyte to the electrodes, or
indirectly, by grid electrodes where the steel strip travels between two pairs of mild
steel plates which form two electrodes of opposite polarity. Current passes from one
pair of electrodes via the electrolyte and the strip to the other pair of electrodes.

See Figure 2.18: Electrolytic degreasing

The temperature of the cleaning solution is kept constant by circulating the solution between the
cleaning tank and the storage tank with a steam heater coil.

Rinsing
This is thorough to avoid contamination of the pickle liquor pretreatment by the cleaning
solution. It is carried out by spraying heated water typically between 150 400 l/min.

Environmental considerations
Alkali fumes generated during cleaning are typically collected and scrubbed prior to release.

Spent cleaning agent and waste water from rinsing are sent for waste water treatment before
discharge.

Figure 2.27: Typical arrangement of ECCS line

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 107
2.9.10.2 Pickling

Sulphuric acid is used for the pickling solution at concentrations of 60 to 115 g/l at ambient
temperature. See Sections 2.3 and 2.9.3.2.

Environmental considerations
Acid fumes generated during pickling are usually collected and scrubbed prior to release.

Spent pickling agents and waste water from rinsing are sent for typical waste water treatment
before discharge.

2.9.10.3 Chromium plating

See Section 2.5.3 for a general description of chromium plating and the health and
environmental considerations.

Pre-dip
Before chrome plating takes place, the strip is passed through a pre-dip tank. This is essential to
prepare the surface of the strip for electrodeposition and prevents stains and other surface
defects forming on the surface of the strip. It is carried out in a sulphuric acid solution of 0.3
0.5 g/l at ambient temperature.

Electroplating
The strip is passed through an electrolyte containing Cr(VI) ions, which are reduced
cathodically on the strip surface to form a duplex layer of hydrated chromium oxide and
metallic chromium. The current applied is determined according to the strip width, line speed,
current efficiency and aimed film weight and flows from the insoluble electrodes to the strip
through the electrolyte, and then returns to rectifier through the conductor rolls.

The plating solution is pumped from a circulation tank, passed through a heat-exchanger and
then travels up into the bottom of the coating tanks, which contain inert anodes of lead-
antimony. It is overflowed from the top part of the tank and then returned to the circulation tank.

A typical plating electrolyte will consists of:

chromic acid 110 - 130 g/l
hydrofluoroboric acid (HBF
4
) 0.30 - 0.44 g/l
sulphuric acid (H
2
SO
4
) 0.60 - 0.80 g/l.

The hydrofluoroboric and sulphuric acids both act as catalysts: they improve the efficiency of
the plating process but are not themselves consumed in the process. In the US, the solutions are
more usually Cr/sulphuric acid only [73, BSTSA, ]. Temperature can have a marked effect on
the electrolyte efficiency; the solution is far more efficient at lower temperatures. However,
because the electrolyte is heated by the electric current passing through it, the temperature has to
be kept constant by the heat-exchanger which cools the solution. In operation the optimum
temperature of the electrolyte is 58 +/- 2 C.

Environmental considerations
The health and environmental issues are described in general in 2.5.3.

Acid fumes are generally collected and scrubbed prior to discharge. The scrubbing solutions
may need treatment prior to discharge.

Chapter 2
108 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.9.10.4 Drag-out and rinsing

At the drag-out tank, electrolyte is spray rinsed away and the washings are returned to the
electrolyte circulation tank. This is connected to an evaporator where the diluted electrolyte is
concentrated and returned the process tank. The amount of spray rinse at the drag-out recovery
tank and the capacity of the evaporator are decided from the chromic acid concentration in the
effluent.

The chromic acid treated strip must be fully rinsed with water before drying, oiling and
recoiling. The strip is sprayed with hot water at the entry and exit ends of the rinse tank to
remove any carry-over of electrolyte or water-soluble constituents in the oxide film. Spraying is
carried out at 50 60 C with a flowrate of about 5000 10000 l/h. Spraying at higher
temperatures and pressures could damage the freshly formed film.

Environmental considerations
The health and environmental issues are described in general in Section 2.5.3.

Chromium and other electrolyte components may be recovered by countercurrent rinsing and
evaporation of drag-out.

Fumes generated during electrolytic plating and drag-out are collected by an extraction unit and
typically scrubbed prior to discharge.

2.9.10.5 Oiling

Prior to recoiling, a thin film of lubricant is applied to the chrome-plated surface. The function
of this film of lubricant is to minimise subsequent damage by abrasion, to facilitate sorting and
to aid in the lacquering and printing operations. A pure grade of either dioxyl sebacate (DOS) or
acetyltributyl citrate (ATBC) is used. The oil is usually applied by an electrostatic oiler. See
Section 2.9.9.8.

The aim weight of oil film on the strip is 3.0 7.0 mg/m
2
2.9.11 Continuous electrolytic lead coating of steel

The only plant operating in Europe is due to close by 2005 or 2006. No specific information has
been exchanged. General information on analogous coil and jig processes can be used for the
majority of the activities and issues.

2.10 Sheet processing for aluminium lithography plates

[118, ESTAL, 2003], [38, Ullmann, 2002/3] Substrates for lithographic plates (see Section
1.3.3) must be easily and cheaply prepared, chemically resistant to acid and alkali solutions, and
solvents in inks or for cleaning. They must also be flexible for fixing to rollers, physically
robust and stable in use for print runs of thousands of copies, with a well defined
microroughness and hydrophilicity for retaining and spreading the dampening agent.
Aluminium is the substrate of choice as it can be easily prepared by the processes described in
Sections 2.10.1, 2.10.2, 2.10.3 and 2.10.4.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 109
2.10.1 Surface graining

Although the surface can be prepared mechanically, it is now more usual to use electrochemical
graining. The raw aluminium surface is first degreased (see Section 2.3) and then uniformly
corroded by using an AC treatment in dilute nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, or mixtures of these
with other acids. This process of graining is a type of pitting corrosion which attacks the entire
surface of the aluminium leaving a very uniform rough surface. The depth of roughness can be
controlled within wide limits (2.5 - 9 ]m) by varying the electrical parameters. Both processing
speed and the uniformity of the resulting substrates depend on temperature, flowrate of the
electrolyte, geometry of the tank, and other parameters. Combination processes have also been
used in graining. In these processes, mechanical graining is followed by electrochemical
treatment.

Graining with wire brushes produces the lowest increase in surface area of the plate, and
electrochemical graining, the highest. This influences, not only the quality of reproduction and
the optical resolution, but also the printing properties (water spreading and length of run). The
finer the graining of an aluminium surface, the lower is the mechanical resistance. With wire-
brushed aluminium, a second hardening step is not required. However, an anodic oxidation step
is essential for electrochemically grained aluminium.

2.10.2 Anodic oxidation (anodising)

Anodic oxidation (as described in Section 2.5.13) involves conversion of the uppermost layer of
the aluminium workpiece to aluminium oxide, without affecting the surface topography
significantly. Two processes are in general use: sulphuric acid or a phosphoric acid electrolyte.
The former leads to smaller pores and thicker oxide layers than the latter.

In general, not more than 5g of oxide is produced per square metre; depending on the roughness
of the surface, this corresponds to a layer thickness of about 1 m. The oxide formed during
anodising is X-ray amorphous and an extremely strong adsorbent. The properties of the
substrate are greatly improved during this step, i.e. the adhesion to the light-sensitive coating;
resistance of the surface to chemicals; its hydrophilicity, hardness and abrasion resistance, and
thus the potential of running length. However, the extent to which the aforementioned aspects
can be effective depends on process parameters and on the process itself.

2.10.3 Post-treatment

Post-treatment of the oxide with certain hydrophilising solutions has proved advantageous in the
production of pre-sensitised (PS) plates. The main purpose of this treatment is to improve the
hydrophilicity of the aluminium oxide surface. However, the adhesive properties, the ability to
be photo-developed and shelf-life of the plates are all influenced at the same time. Solutions of
the following substances have been proposed for this purpose: alkali silicates, phosphonic acids,
hexafluorometalates of group 4 elements (titanium, zirconium, and hafnium), heteropolyacids,
oxy acids of pentavalent phosphorus, and hydrophilic colloids. All of these compounds coat the
surface of the aluminium oxide to generate a very polar covering layer, which improves the
hydrophilicity of the surface.

2.10.4 Coating and further processing

Preliminary treatment of the carrier is followed by in-line coating of the plate in a fully
continuous process. A solution of the components of the light-sensitive coating in a more or less
volatile solvent mixture is applied to the carrier in a defined wet film thickness. The coatings are
generally applied with a fishtail die, with a roller coater, or by spraying. The thickness of dry
coatings is 0.3 5 mm.
Chapter 2
110 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The line speed in modern plants is <1 m/s. The length of individual steps is adjusted to this
process speed. After drying, the web is automatically inspected for coating defects. It is cut
apart, and defective plates are removed. Cutting of the plates requires special attention. Pre-
sensitised lithographic plates are available in many sizes up to about 3 m
2
(1500 2000 mm).

The finished faultless plates are stacked by using a suitable interleaving paper and packed in
lightproof wrapping paper (if necessary, after shrink-film packaging).

The shelf-life required for these pre-sensitised lithographic plates depends on the extent of their
distribution. Also, the more diverse the climatic conditions under which the plates are to be
stored and used, the more diverse are the requirements.

2.11 Printed circuit board manufacturing

[73, BSTSA, ] Printed circuit boards are the basis of electronic sub-assemblies. They are
electronic circuits, often complex, with the thin layers of tracking printed onto thin, non-
conductive layers. Components such as resistors, capacitors, semi-conductors, mounts for
processing chips and memory chips, etc. are added in subsequent operations (not described in
this document). Modern electronic equipment demands a very high tracking density which is
achieved in multilayers or multilayer boards (MLBs) where multiple conductive layers
(cores) are separated by insulating layers called prepregs. A further development of this
technique is the HDI (high density interconnect) board.

Processing is a complicated set of individual operations and will vary to produce any specific
design of board. Over 40 activity stages may be used in the production of boards, although not
all of them will be used for any one board design. Many of these stages have little or no
environmental impacts and are only described briefly in the following sections.

In general, the base materials are phenolic paper, epoxy paper or epoxy glass laminates. For
special applications, ceramic materials, flexible or flex-rigid materials are used. The base
material is clad with copper on one or both sides, with a thickness usually between 5 and
105 ]m, depending on design requirements. Metals other than copper may be occasionally used
for specific applications, such as aerospace. Examples of the construction of PCBs are shown in
Figure 2.27.

The cores are laminated with prepregs, with copper foil outer layers. The cores and the copper
foil are patterned and processed in similar ways, and some stages may be repeated to complete a
complex multilayer board.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_Final_Draft Version May 2005 111
Figure 2.28: Examples of printed circuit board construction
Chapter 2
112 Version May 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_Final_Draft
Over 90 % of European production is made by a subtractive method, where copper is removed
from the base layer to leave the conducting track. called a connect. Additive or semi-additive
processes, which lay down a conductive track are not used often, and are not described.

The following Figure 2.28 shows the production steps involved in creating a typical multilayer
board, as shown in Figure 2.35.

The overall process is complicated, with many of the steps being repeated.

The diagram shows first the ancillary operations essential to all PCB manufacture, such as
production of the design and preparation of phototools.

The inner layers are created, assembled and the outer layers created around them.

Holes (called vias) may be:

buried: not visible from the outside and drilled in the inner layers
blind: visible from one side only and drilled from the outside
visible and drilled right through.

The holes may be plated on the inside (known as through-hole plating, abbreviated to pth) to
provide a connection between layers, see Figure 2.28. Non-plated holes are referred to as non-
pth.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 113
Design of
board &
preparation
of artwork &
jigs
(2.11.1.1.)
PANEL ASSEMBLY
AND OUTER
LAYER
CIRCUIT MANUFACTURE
INNER
LAYER
PRODUCTION
Cut cores to size:
Mechanical and chemical
surface
preparation (2.11.2.1)
Apply, expose, develop, primary
image (2.11.2.3)
Etch Copper (2.11.2.9)
Strip resist 2.11.2.8
Oxidise copper prior
to lamination (2.11.2.6)
Repeat for
multiple layers
Lamination:
pressing, curing,
trimming and drilling
(2.11.2.7)
Mechanical & chemical
preparation (See 2.11.2.1)
Desmear (drill hole cleaning)
(See 2.11.2.4)
Pth: plating through hole
(See 2.11.2.4.)
Apply, expose resist
(2.11.2.3.)
Electrolytic copper (2.11.2.5.)
Tin or Tin/Lead electrolytic plating
(2.11.2.5)
Strip resist (2.11.2.8)
Etch copper (2.11.2.9)
Tin or Tin/Lead strippers
(2.11.2.10)
Solder mask
(2.11.3.1)
Solder application
(2.11.3.3)
Legend stencilling
Gold plating (See 2.11.3.4.)
Other coatings (2.11.3.5)
Solder mask stripping
Finishing all
PCBS
Cleaning
Testing, inspection
& shipping
A
B
B
Photo tool
preparation
(2.11.1.2.)
A
B
OPTIONAL
STEPS
FINAL STAGES
Figure 2.29: Flow diagramof typical printed circuit board production process sequence
Chapter 2
114 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.11.1 Preparatory operations

2.11.1.1 Design of board

The printed circuit design is normally developed on CAD software, including reference marks
such as locating holes for jigs to hold the board during the various processes such as drilling.
The design is transferred to an artwork template called a phototool.

Environmental considerations
Removing large areas of copper slows production, wastes etchant and increases waste and
copper concentration in effluents. Also, a PCB etches more consistently if all regions of the
board have the same ration of copper to bare substrate. Therefore designs may widen connects,
leave unconnected copper in place, or leave large areas of board covered with arrays of small,
electrically isolated copper diamonds or squares [139, Wikipedia, 2004].

2.11.1.2 Generation of phototools (photo lab)

There are two ways of applying a design to a PCB: screen printing or photo-printing. Phototools
are used in both processes and are made of polyester, or, for extremely high dimensional
stability and accuracy, glass. The images are either dia positive (the tracking is shown as a
positive image) or dia negative (the tracking is shown as a negative image). The phototools are
coated with silver-halide emulsion produced by two techniques, although the photo technique or
photo plotting have largely replaced screen printing technology.

Photo plotting uses laser plotters with high resolution to trace the design onto the film with an
accuracy of up to 15 ]m for trace and space. A development and fixation process follows in a
continuous horizontal line.

Environmental considerations
To use as much of the raw laminate as possible, multiple sets of small designs are generated on
the phototool by repeat processes. This will result in multiple images on each laminate panel
processed.

Film generation: due to the silver content, revenues can be generated of wastes originating from
films and developer solutions. Diazofilms, however, are disposed of, as they are not suited for
recycling. Alternative processes, such as direct imaging, are not commercially viable.

When using the screen printing process sodium hydroxide solution, aldehydes, dispersions of
polyvinyl alcohols, toluene and xylene may be discharged into the effluents.

2.11.1.3 Screen printing

Screen printing is based on the well-known printing technique [90, EIPPCB, ]. An ink-
permeable screen is stretched on a frame, degreased, rinsed and dried. A photo-sensitive
emulsion based on a silver halide and polyvinyl alcohol/acetate is applied and dried. The film is
cured with ammonium hydrogen dichromate. The image is applied and developed. If the screens
are used again, they are cleaned by an oxidative cleaning process using stripping solutions such
as enzymes, sodium hypochlorite, and periodate. Residues may be removed using toluene,
xylene or butyl acetate.

Due to higher resolution requirements for the track pattern, the screen printing process is
increasingly losing its importance against the photo printing process.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 115
Environmental considerations
Wastes cannot be recovered.

Water-based effluents may be treated if necessary.

Solvents may be used in cleaning the screens.

2.11.2 Production steps

2.11.2.1 Mechanical and chemical preparation

Cut laminates to size
Prior to the application of the photoresist (see Section 2.11.2.3), the blank laminate has to be cut
or punched to size and shape, and preliminary holes drilled for locating and initial contact
through the board, see board design, Section 2.11.1.1.

The laminate is cleaned to remove the corroded copper surface. A pre-cleaning process provides
a clean face for subsequent treatments (as in Section 2.3.4), but for PCBs a level surface is also
essential for the high-accuracy circuitry. The cleaning processes are typically set up sequentially
in horizontal continuous production lines.

Cleaning
The copper surface is initially cleaned with NaOH or a mixture of tensides and acids (H
3
PO
4
).
This is followed by three further processes [159, TWG, 2004]:

Brushing
Brushing stations then roughen the board surface with roller brushes of bristles or non-
woven abrasives under a water spray to wash away the abraded copper. Bristles can also be
nickel silver or bronze. Problems caused by uneven wear can be overcome by oscillating
rollers. The surface roughness should be between 1.5 and 2.5 ]m. The subsequent adhesion
of dry or liquid resists depends on the number of grooves and pores per surface unit.

The surface is subsequently cleaned (usually on a conveyor system) by spraying in a rinsing
cascade (see Section 4.7).

Abrasion
An inert pumice slurry (SiO
2
72.0 %, Al
2
O
3
13.0 %, K
2
O 4.2 %, Na
2
O 3.5 % (unknown
7.3 %) is sprayed at high pressure to restructure the copper surface to a surface roughness of
Rz = 1.6 to 1.9 ]m, rather than to remove copper. Following this treatment the surface is
rinsed under high pressure (10 bar) and subsequently dried.

Chemical roughening or microetching
This is spray etching using either copper chloride or a pickle of an acidic sodium
persulphate, and for very thin inner cores, is the preferred method, as no mechanical damage
of the cores should occur. The persulphate pickle consists of approximately 100 ml/l
sulphuric acid and between 70 and 120 g/l sodium persulphate. During the microetch
process, the copper value rises continuously. The performance of the etchant is reduced as
soon as the concentration exceeds a value of approximately 30 g/l and the solution has to be
prepared afresh. During a batch process, the concentrate is either precipitated as copper
hydroxide slurry in an alkaline solution, pressed out and discarded as waste, or is recycled
electrolytically.

The surface is rinsed in a cascade followed by a drying process.

Excess water is removed from the boards by squeegee rollers, and then residual humidity is
evaporated by an almost pressureless preheated airflow.
Chapter 2
116 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Environmental considerations
The effluent from the rinsing cascade may be treated through an in-line neutralisation module
prior to discharge.

Copper may be mechanically recovered by centrifuging or filtration, and this, coupled with
cascade rinsing, can enable recycling of the waste water, and near-closed circuit operation of
rinsing.

Where effluents are discharged, they can be treated in a typical waste water treatment plant.
However, it is important to remove as much particulate copper as possible at source, as the
copper can readily dissolve. If dissolved in acid solutions, it requires neutralisation, flocculation
and precipitation; if complexed, it can be more difficult to treat (see Section 2.13.1.1).

Laminate and PCB wastes and off-cuts can be collected by specialist companies for recycling of
the metals.

2.11.2.2 Drilling

In modern high density boards, holes are to be drilled as small as possible, often below 0.5 mm.
NC controlled single spindle machines are used, but are increasingly replaced by the
CNC/DNC controlled multi-spindle machines, as well as laser and the X-ray drilling machines
used to generate very high hole densities for HDI technology.

Multi-spindle CNC drilling machines have table constructions which are extremely warp-
resistant, relatively light and in addition fast to accelerate and to position. Spindles with air
bearings can achieve more than 100000 rpm with individually controlled Z-axis modules.

Environmental considerations
The compressors and air drives produce noise, often at high frequencies. Modern drilling
machines are usually contained in cabinets to reduce noise and maintain clean room working
conditions.

Wear resistant tungsten carbide drill bits are breakage resistant, and can be resharpened,
achieving high drill counts.

The swarf from drilling and routing is only generated in small quantities and cannot be recycled
as the metal content is too low.

Entry boards made of aluminium which are commonly used and drills (for which resharpening
no longer is possible) can be recycled 100 %. Drill-back boards are either disposed of or
returned to the manufacturer. Dusts generated in drilling and routing operations with a
remaining content of metals between 10 and 25 % are disposed of as wastes.

2.11.2.3 Generation of the primary image

There are two types of photoresist (or resist) used to produce the track image including the
reference marks on the laminates from the phototools (see Figure 2.27):

liquid resist applied by roller coating
dry resist applied by lamination.

Inner layers for MLBs may be either structured by screen printing or by dry resist (dry film).
The pattern of the outer layers is generally structured by dry resist. In isolated cases, a third
process, screen printing, may be used. For photo-printing the three process steps are coating
(liquid or dry), exposure and developing. These process steps may be automated and conducted
in a continuous process.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 117
Coating
During the first step, the pretreated surface is coated with a photosensitive layer (photo resist)
which is available either as liquid resist or as dry resist. For the coating, two different important
processes are available: roller coating for liquid resists and lamination for dry resists. Table 2.3
shows the advantages and the disadvantages of both systems

Process Advantages Disadvantages
Low film thickness (approximately
2 - 12 ]m)
Risk of pinhole formation
Lower pollution in effluents due to
lower material usage
Contain more than 50 % VOC-based solvents which
may require reduction under Solvent Emissions
Directive
High yield from material used Potential problems during ultrafiltration of effluents
from developer and stripper
Lower investment Higher energy requirement
Roller-
coating
(liquid
resist)
Low under-etching of copper Risk of involuntary bonding of inner layers

Constant coating thickness because
of dry film
Film thickness is generally 37.5 ]m, more resist
removed creating more effluents and resist waste
No pinholes Higher investment
Low energy consumption as no drier
is needed

Lamination
(dry resist)
No VOC emissions
Table 2.3: Comparison of resist layer types for primary imaging
[122, UBA, 2003]

Roller coating (liquid resist). The liquid resist consists of acrylates, photo-initiators and
fillers and is dispensed through a metering gap and spread under pressure by a
corrugated rubber roller onto the surface of the laminate. Because of the corrugation of
the roller, the contact pressure and the solid content of the liquid resist, the coating
thickness is adjusted to a thickness of between 2 to 12 ]m. The resist is continuously
filtered and monitored in its viscosity while being circulated through a storage tank. The
condition of the rollers is important as damaged rollers produce defective coatings. The
inner layers are coated on both sides and then dried with on-line infrared driers. The
conveyor speed is about 2 4 m/min with a high yield from the liquid resist. Material
losses occur only during the cleaning of the equipment or when changing the resist
Lamination (dry resist) (Figure 2.30). Dry resists are structured in several layers. In
clean room conditions with only yellow light, the photo sensible emulsion is applied by
curtain coating on a polyester carrier foil of 25 ]m thickness, dried and covered with a
polyethylene protective layer. This sandwich can be rolled onto a paper or a plastic roll
core from which it is laminated to the surface of the inner layer. Either manual or fully
automatic laminators are used, the centre core of which is the roller system. Principal
factors influencing the process are: laminating rollers with an aluminium core to
maintain dimensional stability, temperature, contact pressure, waviness of the laminate
surface, laminating speed and the pretreatment method of the copper surface

Chapter 2
118 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Protective film
Dry resist
Heated lamination
roller
Figure 2.30: Application of dry resist

Exposure
The image is photo-printed onto either type of photoresist either manually or automatically - in
imaging equipment in clean rooms under amber light conditions. In Figure 2.30, the phototool
(see Section 2.11.2.3) is exposed to UV light which passes through the transparent areas of the
phototool, and polymerises the monomer components of the resist by cross-linking. The
resulting polymer is resistant to the following development process.

Figure 2.31: Exposure of resist
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 119
Developing
The laminate (resist) is developed by spraying with a sodium carbonate solution while passing
along horizontal continuous line. This step exposes the final track pattern (tracks, pads with
holes, pads for SMDs (surface mount device) and ground planes for the following process
(Figure 2.32).

Figure 2.32: Development of resist

The typical development line consists of the main development chamber, followed by a smaller
chamber(s) with fresh sodium carbonate supply. This enables the panel surface to be rinsed with
clean development solution, reducing the drag-out of contaminated solution into the following
fresh water rinsing zone. The development chamber may be equipped for the first 60 % with
cone nozzles and for the remainder with fan jet nozzles. The manifolds are equipped with an
oscillation to bridge the mechanical effect of the spray nozzles and a better exchange of
solution. The fan jet nozzles are to be installed at an angle of approximately 30 - 40 transverse
to the direction of the process. In case of multiple nozzle bars, these may be installed against
each other.

Screen printing process
In isolated cases non-pth PCBs are still manufactured using screen printing technology. The
copper surface of the panel is coated with a special ink applied through a screen, described in
Section 2.11.1.3. The exposed copper surfaces will be removed during the following etching
process. The pattern is finished; although further processing with solder mask can follow (see
Section 2.11.2.11). Screen printing inks may be removed either by solvents or sodium
hydroxide solution.

Environmental considerations
Table 2.3 sets out the advantages and disadvantages of the two layer coating techniques.

Liquid resists contains more than 50 % solvents that evaporate causing VOC emissions, which
may require reduction by the Solvent Emission Directive [97, EC, 1999, TWG, 2004 #159]

The exposure stage generates no waste or waste water. Cooling water can be recirculated. The
development stage can use successive static rinses of developer to reduce drag-out, and use of
fresh rinsing water (see Section 4.7).

Removed resist can be filtered from the effluent from the developer stage.

Screen printing inks that have to be removed (stripped) by halogenated solvents can now be
substituted by alternatives.

Chapter 2
120 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Process tanks are usually equipped with fume extraction and scrubbing to remove generated
aerosols.

Waste water s may need treatment including neutralisation and settlement.

Packing and protection of dry resists generates significant volumes of waste. Different types of
plastic are used, making separation and return difficult. Some material may be separated and
returned for recycling. Due to the elaborate packing requirements, a return to the suppliers is
generally not possible. It is possible to minimise the incurring wastes by using liquid resists for
inner layers.

2.11.2.4 Plating through holes (pth, through hole plating)

Plating through the holes provides electrically conductive connections between the conductor
tracking planes on both sides of a double sided board or between the multiple tracking planes of
MLBs. There are usually three stages, desmearing, activation and electroless (autocatalytic)
copper plating. However, there is a tendency to replace autocatalytic copper by direct plating
(see environmental considerations at the end of this section).

Note: do not confuse this process with through hole construction, which is a type of PCB
construction where the wires of components are placed through holes drilled through the board.
This has now largely been superseded by surface mounted components.

Desmearing - removal of the smear film
The high drilling and advance speeds cause the drill bits to heat up, causing the drilled polymer
residues to smear as films in the barrel of the holes. It is essential to remove these residues or
there will be poor adhesion of the metal layer to be deposited. Remaining residues may also lead
to later problems by vaporising during the soldering process (out-gassing).

The desmear process is best accomplished by using either potassium or sodium permanganate in
several working steps:

degreasing with phosphoric acid
deburring with abrasive rollers
swelling with sodium hydroxide, butyl diglycol and additives
permanganate process with permanganate and sodium hydroxide
cleaning process with hydrogen peroxide to prevent undesirable reoxidation.

The etch-back process using concentrated sulphuric acid (96 %) is being superseded by the
permanganate process.

A plasma etch process exists but is rarely used.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 121
Process
Desmear (frequently used)
Etch-back (less
frequently used)
Plasma (rarely
used)
Equipment used Horizontal in-line module Horizontal in-line module Vacuum chamber
Operation Continuous Continuous Batch process
Medium
Potassium permanganate,
alkaline
Sulphuric acid
(96 %)
O
2
/F
2
/HF/Freon
Reaction type Oxidising
Resin-solvent,
sulphonating
Radical reaction
Residues Potassium permanganate Dissolved resin (sludge)
Fluorinated surface
ash
Speed of action Fast Fast Medium to slow
Number of process
steps
3 4 2 2 3
Effect on adhesion
glass fibre/resin
None Strong Medium
Suitable for Epoxy Epoxy
Polyacrylates,
polyester, epoxy
Adhesion of low built
copper
Good Satisfactory Adequate
Adhesion of high
built copper
Satisfactory Inadequate Problematic
Table 2.4: Comparison of desmearing processes
[122, UBA, 2003]

Environmental considerations
Table 2.4 compares the processes and residues.

Activation and electroless (autocatalytic) copper plating
See Section 2.5.8.

Direct plating
In direct plating, a conductive polymer layer is applied instead of a copper layer. The usual
processes are based on either polymer-carbon or palladium deposition.

The following list shows the sequence and conditions of one of the possible processes (DMSE,
direct metallisation system evaluation):

DMSE conditioner 60 C, 3 to 5 ml/l
rinsing ambient temperature
oxidative conditioning (KMnO
4
, NaOH) 90 C 50 g/l of each
catalysing (catalyst DMSE) 20 C 65 %
fixing (H
2
SO
4
) 20 C 100 g/l
drying high temperature.

During the first process steps (conditioning with subsequent oxidation with potassium
permanganate) manganese dioxide is formed. Manganese dioxide reacts with a monomer
compound (a thiophene derivate) during catalysis. In the fixing bath, the sulphuric acid causes
the monomer compound and manganese dioxide to react to form a conductive polymer layer.
This layer serves as a conductive layer during the subsequent electrolytic copper plating
process.

Chapter 2
122 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Environmental considerations
Autocatalytic copper baths have a limited lifetime before they require complete replacement.
Disposal of the baths is difficult (see Section 2.5.8). They are difficult to use, inherently
unstable and use formaldehyde and complexing agents including EDTA, which are carried over
in waste waters. While autocatalytic copper, especially with EDTA, was being replaced by
direct plating, the high technical standards required for modern HDIs has lead to a resurgence
in the use both of the autocatalytic process and the use of EDTA. However, the use of direct
plating is increasing again, and about 60 % of the autocatalytic copper baths have been replaced
by direct plating [122, UBA, 2003].

Desmearing has used chromium salts. However, they can now be substituted with potassium or
sodium permanganate (see the direct plating process description in the paragraph above).

The direct plating baths containing complexing agents have to be batch treated or segregated
and treated separately. Rinse-waters containing palladium are treated to extract the metal. The
rinsing water can be countercurrent cascade (see rinsing, Section 4.7). After dealing with the
complexing agents, effluent may treated in a typical waste water treatment plant. The hydroxide
sludge may be recycled as it has a high metals content (see Section 4.17).

2.11.2.5 Electroplating of conductive pattern

Following the structuring process of the primary image, electroplating processes are used for:

build-up (increasing of layer thickness) of conducting structures (primary image)
protection of a copper surface against the etching medium (etch resist)
plating of contact fingers with precious metals.

Figure 2.33: Copper electroplating

Pre-cleaning, deoxidation and acid
The panels that so far have been processed either by screen or by photo printing are now treated
to eliminate any residues of grease, finger prints, etc.(see Section 2.3) They are first pre-cleaned
in acidic, in alkaline or in neutral solutions. The open copper surface (conductive pattern) is
then deoxidised either with sodium persulphate solutions or sulphuric acid/hydrogen peroxide
solutions. Between 0.5 and 1 ]m copper are removed. The copper surface is finally acid dipped
to provide a freshly activated surface for plating.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 123
Electrolytic deposition of copper
Generally, the primary image is built up by a minimum of 20 ]m on top of the base copper
surface where the surface is not protected by the plating resist, see Figure 2.33 (proportionately
less within the barrel of the holes). For details, see Section 2.5.1

Etch resist tin electroplating
In order to protect the electroplated primary image against the attack of etching media the
copper surface is covered with a tin layer (Figure 2.34), described in Section 2.5.6.

Figure 2.34: Tin electroplating

Electroplating with gold or other precious metals
Contact fingers for plug connectors are frequently gold plated. In rare cases, they are finished
with rhodium, ruthenium or palladium. See Section 2.5.7.

Environmental considerations
Electrolytes for etch resists were generally based on lead- and tin fluoroborate solutions. Several
Directives restrict the use of lead in products, and by 1 July 2006 lead additives in electroplating
baths for PCB production will removed to use 100 % tin depositions. (The Directives are:

the End-of-Life Vehicles (ELV) Directive [99, EC, 2000]
the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive [96, EC, 2003] and
the Directive on the Restriction and Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical
and Electronic Equipment (ROHS Directive) [98, EC, 2003]).

In order to satisfy customer requirements for niche products (reflow boards) with 10 ]m
deposits of tin/lead (60/40 %) electrolytes are still used, but with reduced lead content.

The manufacturers of PCBs and their chemical suppliers are in a position to change to lead-free
electrolytes rapidly.

Chemical coppering may be replaced by palladium, graphite or conducting copolymers, which
are so-called clean technology techniques.

To prevent deterioration of the workplace atmosphere, process tanks may be equipped with
fume extraction to remove generated aerosols.

Effluents may require treatment in a waste water treatment plant. These treatments include
filtering, neutralisation and settlement.

Chapter 2
124 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.11.2.6 Inner layer bonding adhesion

Oxide processes have been commonly used and are described below. However, other processes
are now emerging (sometimes referred to as oxide alternative treatments). One type creates a
copper azole complex at the surface. Developments of these processes are rapid and driven by
ever-increasing higher technical requirements [159, TWG, 2004].

The copper surface on inner layers is oxidised to Cu(I) to improve the adhesion between cores
and prepregs and to prevent subsequent delamination (separation of multilayer boards). The
oxide layer of 0.5 5 ]mis formed by one of two processes:

the brown oxide process is most commonly used and consists of hydrogen peroxide,
organic additives (for passivation) and chloride (in mg quantities only), running at
30 C
the black oxide process is carried out in a solution of sodium phosphate (Na
3
PO
4
),
sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and sodium chlorate (NaClO
2
) or hypochlorite (NaOCl) at
80 C.

Effluents can be minimised by ensuring the concentration of the individual components is
maintained by additions equalling the evaporation rate.

Thorough rinsing is necessary after the process (see Section 2.4)

Environmental considerations
The brown oxide process is increasingly used as it runs at lower temperatures and does not use
chlorate or hypochlorite.

The process may need air extraction.

Effluents can be minimised (see above) and treated in a typical waste water treatment plant.

A new bath is made up at approximately 24 months intervals, and can be discarded after batch
treatment by alkaline precipitation.

Oxide alternative treatments reduce consumptions of chemicals and water and generation of
waste.

2.11.2.7 Lamination

Both the laminates and the insulating layers (the prepregs) have to be bonded strongly and using
oxidised copper surfaces (see Section 2.11.2.6) prevents delamination of the finished board. The
pre-oxidised cores of the multilayer are laminated with bonding sheets (prepregs) and copper
foils (outer layers), see Figure 2.35.

The prepregs are shaped sheets of pre-polymerised epoxy resin reinforced with glass fibre. They
liquefy under the influence of pressure and temperature and bond with the inner cores.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 125
Figure 2.35: Schematic of a multilayer board

The principal working steps for the lamination process are:

lay up (registration) in the lay-up station
lamination in a vacuum press
destacking of the lamination tool
trimming of the flash on the rim of the MLB.

Environmental considerations
Offcuts from laminating and trimming can be recycled to recover the metals via specialist
companies.

2.11.2.8 Resist stripping

After electroplating, the photoresist film has served its purpose of defining the circuit image and
is, therefore, completely removed from the board surfaces (Figure 2.36).

Chapter 2
126 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 2.36: Stripping of dry film

Resist strippers are designed to strip fully both aqueous dry film and liquid photoresists. The
resist strippers have been formulated in order to remove the resist rapidly without attacking the
copper or the tin/tin-lead. Controlled swell characteristics minimise lock in between fine tracks.

typical operating temperature 30 C [159, TWG, 2004]
dwell time approximately 60 - 120 seconds.
solution dilute alkali (NaOH or KOH 10 - 20 g/l) with organic
additives such as butyl glycol or butyl diglycol,
although in Germany systems are often run without
organic additives [159, TWG, 2004]

Environmental considerations
Copper emissions, and COD from the soluble organic additives.

The stripper breaks down the film into large particles, which are easily removed from the
effluent by filtration. The effluent may be concentrated using filtration and evaporation, with
distillate being sent to waste water treatment (for COD) and concentrate being managed as a
hazardous waste.

To prevent deterioration of the workplace atmosphere, process tanks may be equipped with
fume extraction to remove generated aerosols.

Waste waters may require treatment in a treatment plant. These treatments include filtering,
neutralisation and settlement.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 127
2.11.2.9 Etching

Etching is undertaken to completely remove the base copper thus leaving only the circuit pattern
which is protected by the tin/tin-lead deposit (etch resist), see Figure 2.37. Typically, modern
etchants will remove copper at 5 to 50 microns per minute at 50 C.

The type of etchant used, the equipment in which it is used and the rate of etch is of great
importance, as they all influence the amount of undercut that occurs. The undercut is where
copper is dissolved from beneath the metal etch resist, producing an overhang of the metal
resist.

Figure 2.37: Etching

The following etchants are in use:

ammoniacal etchants: ammonium salts (chloride, sulphate, carbonate): PCBs that have
been made resistant by deposited metals, i.e. tin (metal-resist technology) are almost
exclusively used in this process, and it is frequently used. Atmospheric oxygen acts as
an oxidising agent
acidic etchants: copper(II) chloride solution used as a starter solution (approximately 30
g/l Cu), attacks metallic copper in the presence of HCl and forms copper (I) chloride
(CuCl). In the presence of hydrochloric acid (200 240 mg/l) and hydrogen peroxide,
the inactive copper (I) is oxidised to copper (II). It is used for inner layer etching,
single-sided, double-sided and multilayer non-pth boards
hydrogen peroxide/sulphuric acid are used for micro-etching and as a replacement for
persulphate sulphuric acid
acidic, ferric chloride (FeCl
3
) is now rarely used.

Etching is performed predominantly in horizontal in-line installations. Those PCBs that have
been made resistant by deposited metals, i.e. tin (metal-resist technology), subsequently are
almost exclusively processed in ammoniacal etchants. The bases are ammonia compounds like
ammonium chloride, ammonium sulphate and ammo-nium carbonate. Aerial oxygen serves as
oxidation agent. The etching solution has the following parameters [159, TWG, 2004]:

pH: 8.0 - 9.5
temperature: 20 - 45 C.
copper: 145 - 170 g/l
halide: 235 - 265 g/l; content of chloride 4 4.5 mol/l
redox potential: about 600 mV.
Chapter 2
128 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Ventilation is likely to be required to remove ammonia and achieve a comfortable work
environment, as well as meeting health and safety requirements. A controlled balance is
necessary. Excessive ventilation will reduce pH and ammonia levels; insufficient ventilation
will allow excessive fumes and an increase in pH and ammonia. Ideally, the ventilation should
be dedicated to the etch line only.

Environmental considerations
Processes are available to recover significant amounts of copper and minimise etchant top up as
well as storage and transport of hazardous solutions.

Where ammonia etchant is used, process tanks may be equipped with fume extraction to remove
generated aerosols and fumes to maintain the workplace atmosphere within health and safety
levels. Fume extraction may require scrubbing, which will increase ammonia levels in the
effluent.

Effluents may require separate treatment prior to a typical waste water treatment plant,
depending on etchant chemistry.

Etching solutions are generally returned to suppliers or external companies for processing. This
involves exchanging used bath solutions for new ones, with handling and storage. Internal
reprocessing may be possible with additional recycling modules.

Acidic etching solutions: generated concentrates in the acidic etching process (hydrochloric
acid, copper chloride and hydrogen peroxide) are recycled by external suppliers or contractors.
By optimum management of all parameters and by enriching the copper, these wastes can be
sold. The regenerated hydrochloric acid can be re-used in the process. Other methods of
recycling have not proven to be successful.

Ammonia etching solutions: processes are available to recover significant amounts of copper
and minimise etchant top-up as well as storage and transport of hazardous solutions, see Section
4.15.7.

2.11.2.10 Tin stripping

This process is now typically undertaken in a horizontal mode as a two-stage tin lead stripping
technique. The first stage strips to the intermetallic layer, then the second stage strips the
intermetallic layer thus leaving a blemish-free copper surface. Hydrogen tetrafluoroborate, tin
fluoroborate or nitric acid solutions are used:

stage 1: temperature and immersion time 25 35 C for 20 60 seconds

stage 2: temperature and immersion time 25 35 C for 10 30 seconds.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 129
Figure 2.38: Stripping of tin resist

Environmental considerations
To prevent deterioration of the workplace atmosphere, process tanks may be equipped with
fume extraction to remove generated aerosols.

Waste waters may require treatment in a treatment plant. These treatments include filtering,
neutralisation and settlement. Internal reprocessing has not proven effective for the quantity of
metal recovered.

2.11.2.11 Application of solder mask

After the stripping of the etch resist, the unprotected copper surfaces on the PCBs needs
protection from corrosion, and from solder bridging (solder making unwanted connections
between tracks) during the soldering process when components are added to the board. All
copper portions which are not required in the assembly process are covered with an insulating
resin matrix (see Figure 2.39 and Figure 2.40). Several methods are available, the most
important ones being screen printing and curtain coating.

Screen printing is described in Section 2.11.1.3. The difference here is that a solder mask is
applied. However, this technique is not normally used for high volume production.

Chapter 2
130 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 2.39: Coating with solder mask

Curtain coating is more efficient and used for high production volumes. The panels are passed
on a horizontal belt (at approximately 20 m/min) through a curtain of solder mask. After it is
tack cured it is exposed through a photo stencil (similarly to etch resist, see Section 2.11.2.5).
As in developing etch resist, the non-exposed surfaces are selectively stripped in a developer
solution of sodium carbonate or ethyl glycol: aqueous alkaline masks are increasingly used. The
panels are then rinsed, dried and cured in line, see Figure 2.39.

Figure 2.40: Curtain application by and curing of solder mask
Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 131
Environmental considerations
Residues originating from developing photosensitive inks and masks are disposed of. The
containers in which lacquers have been supplied may still have residues of their contents after
emptying. These containers may be collected for recycling.

2.11.3 Additional surface finishing activities

There are several surface finishes: Hot Air Solder Level (HASL), Organic Solderability
Preservative (OSP), Electroless Nickel Immersion Gold (ENIG), Immersion Silver (ImmAg),
Immersion Tin (ImmSn), Reflowed Tin/Lead, Electrolytic Nickel Gold, and Electroless
Palladium. Some of these are described below and in Sections 2.5.7 and 2.5.9. The selection of
which steps are applied depends on specifications and subsequent process requirements.. As this
industry develops rapidly, further information can be found on industry websites. [159, TWG,
2004].

The application of a solder mask leaves areas (called pads and lands) for the surface mounting
of components. These surfaces need protecting, usually by Ni/Au, if the soldering of
components is not carried out immediately.

Figure 2.41 Hot air levelling

2.11.3.1 Solder application

This is also called Hot Air Leveling (HAL) or Hot Air Solder Leveling (HASL). After pre-
cleaning (degreasing, deoxidation and drying), the boards are immersed in a flux (rosin) bath,
followed by dipping in a eutectic tin-lead bath at approximately 240 C. The molten tin-lead is
blown out of the holes under high pressure. This hot air knife levels the tin-lead deposit, with a
thickness of about 1 25 ]m., as in Figure 2.41. The boards are rinsed and dried.

Environmental considerations
Rinsing produces effluents containing thermally cracked fluxes and therefore has a chemical
oxygen demand.

Fume extraction may be required.

Chapter 2
132 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The replacement of tin-lead solder used in the HAL process will be finalised by 1 July 2006 to
meet the requirements of the ELV Directive [99, EC, 2000] and the ROHS Directive [98, EC,
2003]. Alternatives are either lead-free solders or electroless plating of tin, nickel/gold or
organic substances, which protect the metallic copper of tracks and holes from dirt and
oxidation and maintain their solderability.

The resulting dross and solder has a commercial value and is returned to the suppliers for
external processing.

2.11.3.2 Nickel gold and/or tin

After surface preparation, a layer of electroless nickel is applied (see Section 2.5.8), followed by
an immersion gold coating (see Section 2.5.9) [159, TWG, 2004].

Environmental considerations
Precious metals can be recovered.

2.11.3.3 Organic passivation

Organic passivations are increasingly used on horizontal moving lines. A protective layer of
0.2 0.3 ]m is deposited out of a solution of acetic acid, imidazole derivates and ammonium
compounds. This layer is removed by a flux immediately prior to the soldering process.

Environmental considerations
Rinsing waters and concentrates can be treated in a waste water treatment plant. Prior separation
and/or treatment may be required to prevent complexes being formed with metals.

2.11.3.4 Other activities Stripping (de-metallising) racks and plating baskets

The plating racks and plating baskets must be regularly stripped of metal build-up (see Section
2.3.9). Carriers used in electroless copper plating are usually stripped in sodium persulphate
solutions. Metal carriers which have been electroplated with copper and tin are stripped
chemically, very often with nitric acid or in an anodic process.

2.12 Utility inputs

The utilities used in surface treatment include natural gas, propane gas and/or liquefied propane
gas (LPG), fuel oil, coal, electricity and water [128, Portugal, 2003].

2.12.1 Energy

The energy uses are described in Section 1.4.3. Electricity is used in the form of direct current
for the electrochemical processes. Gas, oil, coal and/or electricity can be used for process
heating, depending on availability and cost.

Electricity is also used for process cooling and fume extraction. Gas and/or electricity are used
for the drying of surface treated work.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 133
The range of the typical proportion of energy consumptions per usage for a sub-contract acid
zinc plating shop are:

direct current for pretreatment and zinc plating 20 40 %
process heating for pretreatment and zinc plating 20 40 %
process cooling for zinc plating 0 17 %
fume extraction 5 13 %
drive motors, drying, space heating, lighting 13 40 %.

2.12.1.1 Electricity

Energy can be drawn from three-phase supplies and/or stepping down from high voltage
supplies. These AC supplies are rectified to DC power for the electrochemical reactions within
the installation via a system of bus bars (usually aluminium or copper) between the rectifiers
and the anodes. There can be significant energy losses associated with these activities which are
highlighted in Section 1.4.3.

The electrical power consumption in the electrochemical reaction per m
2
of surface treated in
the process can vary according to the process chemistry. Some processes, such as acid zinc are
more power efficient than others (such as cyanide zinc) where energy is lost in electrochemical
side reactions (in this case, the oxidation of cyanide).

2.12.1.2 Fossil fuels and process heating

Many of the process vats have to be heated above ambient temperatures to operate efficiently.
Oil and gas (and possibly in some cases, coal) are used as the main heating sources for process
solution. Vats are often indirectly heated by a hot liquid circulating through heating coils. High
pressure hot water systems (where the water can be circulated under pressure and at
temperatures above 100 C), and thermal fluid systems (oils which can also be run at
temperatures above 100 C) can provide a greater energy input for the space used, and may be
required where process operating temperatures are close to 100 C. Unpressurised hot water can
be used where process temperatures are below 85 C.

Leakages from water-based systems do not usually damage process solutions, but may dilute
solutions beyond economic recovery. Thermal fluid leaks can require the complete replacement
of process solutions, but are more easily observed.

Burners may be installed to heat tanks directly [128, Portugal, 2003]. Individual electric tank
(immersion) heaters are widely used for process lines with small tank volumes (such as precious
metals, and reel to reel), and may be used in manually operated lines with larger tank volumes
but low throughputs or to assist other systems to achieve operating temperatures.

Energy use depends on the operating temperature required for the process to operate efficiently
and heat losses from the system.

In electrochemical processes, heat also comes from the passing of current through the solution,
and some chemical processes may be exothermic.

Chapter 2
134 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.12.1.3 Cooling of process solutions

Many processes need to be maintained within a temperature range for optimum efficiency of
quality of treatment and minimising breakdown of process chemicals. They may require heat
input before starting to process (such as after a shutdown period overnight), but current passed
during the electrochemical reactions or some chemical reactions may heat the solution beyond
the range required. More information is provided in [85, EIPPCB, ]. There are three common
systems used in surface treatment:

the simplest cooling system is once-through with water running once through cooling
coils in the vats and discharging the water to foul sewer or surface water: water may
come from the town supply, a nearby river or a borehole extracting groundwater. Water
may also be recycled from other uses in the installation (such as used rinse-water or
treated effluent) before discharge. The water used may require treatment before use,
such as filtration of river or groundwater. These systems have the highest water usage
and will be one of the biggest uses of water in an installation
in recirculating cooling tower systems, the cooling water is recycled constantly through
a cooling tower. However, running the water over the cooling tower maintains a high
dissolved oxygen level which can cause corrosion within the system and evaporation of
water at the tower can cause the build-up of suspended solids. The recirculating water
may therefore require treatment to prevent corrosion and some of the water must be
discharged periodically to prevent build-up of excess dissolved solids
in closed systems, where the coolant is not in contact with the outside air. This
minimises corrosion and there is no build-up of dissolved solids. The cooling system
may be refrigerated or pass through fan-cooled radiators.

Electricity is also consumed in cooling systems for pumping and for chilling in refrigerated
systems.

2.12.1.4 Other energy requirements within the installation

Electricity is also used for ancillary equipment, see Section 1.4.3 Energy use in the heating,
cooling and ventilation of work and storage spaces will depend on the installation construction,
the location (such as northern or southern Europe) and the heat and water vapour losses as well
as fumes from the process lines.

2.12.2 Water

Water supply and quality is critical in this industry. It is can be used in cooling (see Section
2.12.1.3) but its other large use is in rinsing between process stages to prevent contamination of
the next process, overreaction at, or staining of, the workpiece or substrate (see Section 2.4).
The use of the water determines the quality required and the source(s) that can be used, and an
installation may have more than one water source for different purposes. Water sources are:

borehole
river
towns (mains) water
recycling from other uses in the installation, such as rinses or treated effluents.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 135
2.13 Abatement of potential releases to the environment

This section summarises abatement treatment options for potential releases. The main releases
are described in Section 1.4.4. Potential environmental releases are identified as key
environmental considerations for each activity described in the preceding sections of Chapter 2.
These are:

the emission of pollutants in waste waters
the production of hazardous waste
the emissions to air.

Emissions to air are the least significant of these. [104, UBA, 2003] Any release may require
treatment to meet environmental regulations (IPPCD, art 9 and art 10 [1, EC, 1996]), including
local requirements (environmental quality standards or legislation) [121, France, 2003].

2.13.1 Waste water

Installations for surface treatment by chemical and electrolytic activities are predominantly
water-based and generate significant quantities of effluents containing both inorganic and
organic pollutants. The wide range of processes and of raw materials means that effluents are
complex and vary in composition by time, process and plant.

The most effective method for preventing pollutants entering the water environment is
minimisation of the loss of materials. The water-based processes lose their materials by drag out
into rinse-waters, and minimisation of these material losses in rinsing is discussed in the
sections describing methods for rinsing and drag-out control, Sections 2.4, 4.6 and 4.7.
Minimisation of water usage is also discussed in these sections.

The following issues form the basis for selecting the most appropriate means of waste water
treatment and for setting emission limit values [111, ACEA, 2003] [3, CETS, 2002]:

the type of processes which give rise to the waste water
the volume and the composition of the waste water
the fate or use of the waste water discharge (i.e. internal or external re-use, discharge to
municipal waste water treatment, or direct discharge to surface waters) and the
associated quality standards or requirements (environmental: receiving water and/or
sewage sludge standards or production requirements) [111, ACEA, 2003]
regulatory discharge requirements
the composition of other streams discharging to the same watercourse or foul sewer
(this may be for the consideration of the regulator)
wider environmental impacts of adopting any particular process (for example, high
energy consumption for little environmental gain).

Waste water treatment is described extensively elsewhere, such as generally in [87, EIPPCB, ]
and specifically for this sector [6, IHOBE, 1997, 13, UNEP, et al., 2002, 21, Agences de l'Eau
de France, et al., 2002]. The following sections (Sections 2.13.1.2 to 2.13.1.15) are therefore a
brief description of the usual contaminants and the activities used to treat them.

Chapter 2
136 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Waste water is contaminated by used reagents and the breakdown products from the processes.
The main ingredients of concern are metal ions (cations), which are conservative, see Section
1.4.4.1 and toxic anions such as cyanide or chromate. Some of the waste water treatments
themselves may produce contaminants that require further treatment, so any or all of the
following categories of constituents may be present and are discussed in this section [21,
Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002] and see Section 1.4.4:

organic materials (Section 2.13.1.2)
o immiscible non-halogenated oils, greases, solvents
o immiscible halogenated oils, degreasing solvents, paint solvents
o soluble wetting agents, brighteners, organic ions and ligands, e.g. acetate, EDTA
(Section 2.13.1.8), organic materials expressed as COD
o AOX potentially formed in effluent treatment
particulates suspended solids metal hydroxides, carbonates, powders and dusts, film
residues, metallic particles, etc. (Section 2.13.1.4)
acids and alkalis (Section 2.13.1.3)
metals soluble anions from process activities (Sections 2.13.1.5, 2.13.1.6 and
2.13.1.7)
nitrogenous materials NH
4
+
, NO
3
-
, NO
2
-
(Section 2.13.1.9) from greasing, scouring,
coating, phosphate coating, heat treatment, chemical nickel plating, etc.
cyanides CN
-
, SCN
-;
from degreasing, coating, etc.(Section 2.13.1.10)
fluorides from scouring, passivation, polishing, coating, etc.(Section 2.13.1.12)
phosphated compounds from degreasing, phosphate coating, brightening, chemical
nickel plating, etc.(Section 2.13.1.13)
sulphides (Section 2.13.1.11)
other salts Cl
-
, SO
4
2-
, K
+
, Na
+
, Ca
+
.(Section 2.13.1.14).

All contaminants need either or both:

chemical treatment to destroy or change them to less harmful chemical species, or more
readily managed or removable chemical species
separation from the water to predetermined levels. The removal of the contaminants
from water can be by filtering and/or settlement techniques, followed by flocculation at
the correct pH and settlement.

In some cases, the whole waste water treatment plant can operate with mixed waste streams.
With some substances, it is preferable to segregate the waste water streams for individual
treatment prior to separate discharge, or subsequent mixed treatment.

Treatment may be by batches or continuously for the whole or portions of the flow [3, CETS,
2002]. Batch treatment may be easier to control and supervise, but requires more capital plant
capacity to contain the flow to be treated and may require more direct supervisory time.
Continuous treatment requires more sophisticated control systems and their consequent
maintenance.

Figure 2.42 describes the layout of a typical waste water treatment plant.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 137
Concentrated acid
or basic effluents
Concentrated
cyanides
Dilute
cyanides
Concentrated
chromium VI
effluents
Dilute
chromium VI
effluents
Dilute acid or
basic effluents
Chromium VI
reduction
Cyanide
oxidation
Neutralisation
and
precipitation
Flocculation
Liquid/solid
separation
Final cleaning/
polishing
treatments
Final check
De-watering
of sludges
DISCHARGE WASTE
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
S
O
F
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
E
F
F
L
U
E
N
T
S
T
R
E
A
M
S
P
R
I
M
A
R
Y
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
S
E
C
O
N
D
A
R
Y
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
T
E
R
T
I
A
R
Y
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
Figure 2.42: Flow diagram for a typical waste water treatment plant
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002]

Separation is normally by removing the contaminants from the water, but can also be by
removing the water from the contaminants by:

evaporation, with or without condensation of the water vapour, with a residual sludge
by reverse osmosis, providing a purified, but not pure, water and with a waste water,
which contains the concentrated impurities.

The residual concentrates may in turn be reduced to a solid by the addition of other materials or
the evaporation of the remaining water [3, CETS, 2002].

2.13.1.1 Treatment techniques

Various treatment techniques are mentioned in the following sections. Some of them are also
used for process solution maintenance, treatment of incoming water and for treating waste
waters prior to recycling, see Section 2.7.

2.13.1.2 Organic materials

Immiscible organics
These are split into two groups:

non-halogenated - oils, greases, solvents
halogenated - oils, degreasing solvents, paint solvents.

Chapter 2
138 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
These may first be reduced to their solubility limit by physical separation, such as flotation
(such as for oils, electropainting solids) or for volatile substances, by liquid/liquid phase
separation. For volatile organics, when levels below the solubility limit are required, two
options exist [3, CETS, 2002]:

air stripping, with removal from the air, e.g. by activated carbon, to circa 1 mg/l and
final polishing by passing the waste water through activated carbon
oxidation to carbon dioxide (and halogen acid in the case of halogenated organics)
using UV irradiation and hydrogen peroxide addition.

Soluble organic materials
Wetting agents, brighteners, organic ions and ligands, e.g. acetate, EDTA, etc.

Sequestering agents increase the difficulty in removing metals by flocculation and settlement by
complexing them and, if in surplus, may solubilise metals in the outside environment [22,
Fraunhofer, 2002]. The concentration of miscible organics may be reduced by oxidation (such
as by hypochlorite) by UV irradiation and hydrogen peroxide addition (typically 30 minutes), or
their deleterious effects reduced by the addition of a benign metal salt, e.g. calcium
chloride/hydroxide [3, CETS, 2002].

Reduction of COD
Dissolved organics in waste water raise the chemical oxygen demand (COD). The types of
compounds present have highly variable breakdown rates, both chemically and biologically.
Upstream prevention is usually the easiest option in reducing COD load.

Where COD requires treatment, biological treatment by arranging discharge to the municipal
waste water treatment plant is usually the easiest treatment option. Note, however, some
compounds in effluents can be resistant to biological oxidation, and it may be necessary to test
the biodegradability of the effluent [121, France, 2003]. In some circumstances, chemical
treatments may be necessary and they include [21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002]:

physico-chemical treatment
chemical emulsion breaking
adsorption on activated carbon or other similar materials
membrane techniques
concentration by evaporation
oxidation techniques using hypochlorite, peroxide, etc.

AOX
Organic chlorine compounds can potentially be formed in effluent treatment when hypochlorite
or chorine are used as the oxidising agents.

2.13.1.3 Acids and alkalis

Acid and alkali discharges usually require pH adjustment to a range dependent on the receiving
water or sewer before discharging. Continuous flow streams of opposite pH may be partially
neutralised by mixing together. Batch discharges such as end-of-service life process solutions
may be stored and mixed with solutions of opposite pH.

The chemistries of effluent pretreatments, such as reduction of hexavalent chromium or
oxidation of cyanide, require a pH close to that of the originating process solution and are
usually carried out prior to neutralisation.

Usually, pH control is on a continuous flow basis with automatic controls, although some
discharges are treated on a batch basis.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 139
2.13.1.4 Particulate material

Metal hydroxides, carbonates, powders and dusts, film residues, metallic particles, etc. may be
removed by settling or filtration, see Section 2.13.2.1.

2.13.1.5 Metals soluble anions

The concentration of metals re-use or for recycling, either directly or after further treatment,
may be viable, depending on the chemistry of the solution and the technique used. Techniques
are described in Section 2.7. The capture of precious metals, e.g. platinum, gold, silver, rhodium
and ruthenium may be achieved from waste water by electrochemical recovery or by ion
exchange (see Section 2.7.6 and 2.7.8 with the subsequent sale of the loaded resin or the
concentrated regeneration liquor stream to specialist recyclers. The reclamation of other cations
from waste water streams may be carried out individually or as a composite of several metals.
Figure 2.43 shows an example of a treatment plant using ion exchange.

Where multiple processes are operated and where metal recycling is carried out, it may be
preferable to concentrate or precipitate the metals arising from different metal plating lines in
segregated streams. This may improve the economics and/or the practicalities of recovering the
metals.

Figure 2.43: Example of waste water treatment plant using ion exchange
(Productmetal S.A. and Agence de leau Seine-Normandie)

2.13.1.6 Reduction of oxidation state of metal ions

In some cases, it is necessary to reduce the oxidation state of the metal as the higher oxidation
state(s) may not be readily flocculated and precipitated by pH change [3, CETS, 2002]. For
instance, the reduction of Cr(VI) by sodium dithionite:

4 Na
2
Cr
2
O
7
+ 3 Na
2
S
2
O
3
+ 13 H
2
SO
4
Y4 Cr
2
(SO
4
)
3
+ 7 Na
2
SO
4
+ 13 H
2
O
2.13.1.7 Precipitation of metallic floc

The multivalent metal ions are most conveniently removed by precipitation as the hydroxide
and concentrations of individual metals in the post-settlement effluent well below 1 mg/l are
achievable in theory. As the transition metals are amphoteric, there is a minimum solubility
requiring careful pH selection and control (Figure 2.44):
Chapter 2
140 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 2.44: Variation of solubility of dissolved metal with pH

Simultaneous removals of several metal ions to very low levels may require selection of
different pH values and settlement sequentially. The treatment of segregated streams may be
preferable to sequential pH adjustments with intervening solids removal stages. The pH may
require further adjustment prior to discharge.

The precipitated metals may be separated by settling. There are various types of separator or
settlement tank such as [21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002, 87, EIPPCB, ]:

longitudinal
upward flow radial
laminar.

The use of an anionic settling aid (a coagulant with high ionic charge density, such as ferric
ions, aluminium chlorohydrate) or a polyelectrolyte may be beneficial in coagulating a stable
floc and optimising settlement. They also assist with any subsequent sludge dewatering, see
Section 2.13.2.1.

For low discharge levels (for example, below about 3 mg/l for zinc), the effluent will require
polishing (tertiary treatment) by filtration using sand, mixed media, cartridge or pressure filters.
For small discharges, direct filtration of the suspension instead of settlement may be more cost
effective.

The settled floc or filtrate will contain about 5 % solids and is normally further concentrated by
dewatering (see Section 2.13.2.1).

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 141
For residual metal ion concentrations below that achievable by hydroxide addition alone,
insoluble sulphide based salts may be used in conjunction with post hydroxide addition. Dithio-
carbamate (DDC) is one of a range of suitable materials which are capable of reducing the
concentration of soluble transition metals to below 0.1 mg/l.

2.13.1.8 Complexing (sequestering, chelating) agents

Sequestering agents, particularly EDTA are being used in increasing quantities again in the
printed circuit board industry to achieve the high specifications being demanded in modern
printed circuit technology [22, Fraunhofer, 2002].

The success of precipitation processes is dependent on the reaction between the soluble metal
ion and hydroxide. Complexed metals present problems as hydroxides are difficult to form and
the presence of complexing agents can be a cause of failure in waste water treatment plants
(i.e. breach of operating limits for metals in the effluent). Waste water streams containing the
cyanide (which is a complexing agent) may be easily treated (see Section 2.13.1.10). Other
sequestering agents present in a number of cleaners and proprietary electrolytes are more
difficult to overcome. Where complexing agents are a problem, metal precipitation may be
possible with the use of calcium hydroxide in place of sodium hydroxide or by the addition of
calcium or magnesium chlorides which preferentially complex with the agent. Extensive prior
digestion (>30 minutes) with strong oxidising agents has been found to be beneficial in reducing
the effect of sequestering agents but will oxidise chromium and manganese which then require
subsequent reduction prior to precipitation where these metals are present. Alternative organic
removal treatments, e.g. activated carbon and non-ionic resins, prior to precipitation may be
environmentally sound. Microbiological oxidation of organics remains a theoretical possibility.

2.13.1.9 Nitrogenous materials

Compounds containing nitrogen such as NH
4
+
, NO
3-
, NO
2-
come from degreasing, scouring,
coating, phosphate coating, heat treatment, chemical nickel plating, etc. [21, Agences de l'Eau
de France, et al., 2002].

Ammonia
If recovery by steam stripping is not economic, then ammonia may be oxidised to nitrogen and
water with sodium hypochlorite. Any excess hypochlorite can be reduced using sodium
sulphite. Ammonia can also be oxidised biologically, usually in a municipal waste water
treatment plant.

Oxidation of nitrites
Nitrites can be oxidised with sodium hypochlorite at pH 6 with control of rH, usually
automatically. It can also be oxidised with hydrogen peroxide to nitrate [113, Austria, 2003].
Nitrites can be reduced to N
2
with sodium bisulphite at pH 2; in this case, control by rH is not
possible [121, France, 2003]. In an acid solution, nitrite can easily be reduced to nitrogen gas by
using sulphamic acid [113, Austria, 2003].

Environmental considerations
AOX may be formed when using hypochlorite solution [113, Austria, 2003].

Chapter 2
142 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.13.1.10 Cyanides

Cyanide (CN
-
, SCN
-)
from degreasing and coating may be oxidised. The cheapest and most
widely used option is hypochlorite or chlorine gas used at high pH, which first oxidises the
cyanide to sodium cyanate, and secondly to ammonium and carbonate after pH neutralisation
(about pH 8.5). Any excess hypochlorite can be reduced using sodium sulphite. Sodium
hypochlorite solution can be used, or chlorine gas can be used to generate hypochlorite ions in
situ at larger facilities. Other oxidising agents such as hydrogen peroxide can be used, with pH
varying according to oxidising agent [113, Austria, 2003] [159, TWG, 2004].

Environmental considerations
AOX may be formed when using hypochlorite solution or chlorine gas.

When using hypochlorite solution or chlorine gas, the pH for the first stage must be kept high to
ensure a rapid rate of reaction and to prevent the formation and release of the volatile
lachromate, cyanogen chloride.

2.13.1.11 Sulphide

Sulphide is normally controlled by the excess of the multivalent cations present in most waste
water streams, with no further treatment necessary. Where it occurs in excess, it may be
precipitated out as elemental sulphur on oxidation with hydrogen peroxide or iron III salts.

2.13.1.12 Fluorides

Fluoride occurs from scouring, passivation, polishing, coating etc, and is readily precipitated out
as calcium fluoride at a pH above 7. The lowest solubility of calcium fluoride is 15 mg/l at pH
11.2.

2.13.1.13 Phosphated compounds

Phosphate compounds are used in degreasing processes, phosphate coating, heat treatment,
brightening, chemical nickel plating, etc. Although they are not usually a problem, if necessary
they may require control because of local environmental conditions: the release of several kilos
of phosphorus per day can have an impact on a receiving river and its eutrophication [121,
France, 2003], phosphate is most conveniently precipitated out as calcium hydroxide phosphate.

The solubility is less than 5 mg/l at a pH greater than 10.

2.13.1.14 Other salts

Other ions such as Cl
-
, SO
4
2-
, K
+
, Na
+
, and Ca
+
are not normally a problem, but local
environmental conditions may require their removal.

Sulphate can be readily precipitated as calcium sulphate; the solubility product is 2 g/l
depending on concentration of other ions.

Concentration of other ions may be desirable, and ion exchange, reverse osmosis or evaporation
may be used either prior to one of the other treatments (above) or to produce a concentrate for
disposal as a waste.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 143
2.13.1.15 Final cleaning of effluent (polishing)

Whatever waste water treatment technologies are used, the treated water will contain small
amounts of the treated components and a significantly higher concentration of more benign
materials arising from the treatment reagents used. The effluent may be treated further and
examples of this are [3, CETS, 2002]:

fine (sand) filter (circa 5 ]m) to remove residual particulate material
activated carbon bed to remove organic material
chelating, crown or thiol cation exchange resin bed to selectively remove multivalent
ions.

2.13.2 Wastes

2.13.2.1 Sludge dewatering

Solids removed from the main effluent by precipitation or filtering may be further concentrated
using a filter press, belt press or centrifuge to produce a cake manageable as a solid. Filter press
treatment of metal hydroxide sludge at pressures above 15 bars can give a final cake with
15 - 35 % solids. The final solids of sludges from anodising rarely rise above 25 % [118,
ESTAL, 2003, Sheasby, 2002 #132].

2.13.2.2 Sludge drying

Filter cake may be further dried to lower water content.

Environmental considerations
Drying requires 450 kWh of thermal energy per tonne. Waste heat from other processes can be
used.

Drying may create a powdery waste at a water content of less than 40 %. This may cause more
dust problems in handling than a solid cake.

Dried sludge containing residues of oxidising components, such as H
2
O
2
, NaOCl or
persulphates, are reported to heat up through exothermal reactions when stored in big bags,
(tonne bags) and may eventually spontaneously combust [3, CETS, 2002].
In some cases, drying sludge may assist subsequent processing, such as solidification.

2.13.2.3 Liquid wastes

Some waste process solutions may be stored and disposed of as liquid waste, sent for specialist
recycling or recovery or disposed of as hazardous wastes. Examples are autocatalytic plating
solutions, spent etchants and sludges from anodising.

2.13.2.4 Other solid wastes

Surface treatment of metals and plastics generates other industrial wastes. These normally
comprise the used packaging from raw materials (chemicals) and incoming workpieces or
substrates, as well as discarded equipment such as broken jigs and barrels.

Chapter 2
144 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
2.13.2.5 Sludge stabilisation

In some cases, such as where waste management regulations require, sludge may be stabilised
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002], although this is usually carried out off-site by
specialist waste management contractors, [89, EIPPCB, ]. For solidification, two main types of
binder are used:

hydraulic, such as cements, fly ashes from cement kilns or coal-fired power generation
hydrocarbon-based, such as tars or bitumen (a process derived from the nuclear
industry).

Drying of the sludge may be required prior to stabilisation.

Environmental considerations
The volume of waste solidified with hydraulic binders increases in volume 1.5 to 2 fold.

Waste treated with hydraulic binders (such as lime) may have a pozzolanic action and develop
mechanical properties that increase stability with time. However, the surface active agents
present may interfere with this reaction.

2.13.2.6 Valorisation of wastes

Techniques exist to externally re-use or recycle wastes. These include using sludges as a raw
material in on-ferrous metals refining, and regenerating waste acids. These are described in
Section 4.17.

2.13.3 Waste gases and other airborne emissions

There are two reasons for managing airborne emissions in surface treatment installations [111,
ACEA, 2003]:
where health and safety legislation applies to the workplace atmosphere for the
protection of the employees from dangerous substances in the workplace
working atmospheres that are damp, acid, alkali or which contain other chemicals
and/or particulates are likely to be corrosive to materials, workpieces and substrates,
equipment and the fabric of buildings. This can lead to problems such as deterioration
of raw materials, finished products becoming corroded and being rejected, equipment
malfunctioning and buildings deteriorating at a high rate. Many installations extract
water vapour, as well as acid, alkali and other gaseous or aerosol contaminants to
prevent these problems.

Additional treatment of the exhaust gases may be required to meet emission values,

2.13.3.1 Emission sources and types

Airborne emissions include gases, vapours, mists and particulates [111, ACEA, 2003]. The
main sources are highlighted throughout Chapter 2 and include layer stripping (such as pickling
and stripping baths), electrolytic degreasing baths, individual treatment processes, as well as
some drag-out and rinsing processes (especially where the rinses are heated and/or sprayed).
Particulates can be from mechanical processes such as linishing and polishing, or form from
some mists containing chemicals where water vaporises from the droplets leaving airborne
chemical particulates.

Chapter 2
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 145
Harmful substances can be emitted to air as gases from relevant processes (e.g. NO
X,
HF, HCl)
as well as aerosols loaded with caustic, acids or other chemicals (e.g. caustic soda solution,
sulphuric acid, chromium (VI) compounds, cyanide), see Table 1.4.

Emissions of solvents from solvent degreasing or drying of organic coatings (such as
electropainting or lacquering) are discussed in [90, EIPPCB, ].

2.13.3.2 Measures for reducing emissions

Measures can be taken to minimise pollutant emissions from sources. For example:

air agitation of process solutions can be replaced with other methods such as:
o circulating the process solution by pumping
o mechanisms to move the jigs
baths not in constant use can be kept covered
additives can be used to suppress aerosol formation, such as for chromium plating. See
Sections 1.4.4.1 and 2.5.3.

2.13.3.3 Extraction systems

Extraction systems can be installed for the capture of the emissions. Although some shops will
have general extraction of the workspace, edge or lip extraction at the emitting vat is a
widespread procedure. Lines may be fully enclosed with extraction systems. Transporter
systems can include an integral lid which is put in place with the flight bar.

The quantity of exhaust air caught by the edge exhaust and the quantity of pollutants contained
depend on several parameters:

bath size
continuous or intermittent operation of the bath
bath temperature
physico-chemical characteristics of the specific chemicals
classification and permissible concentration values in the workplace
use of additives for the decrease and/or avoidance of the emissions to HF, NO
X
and Cr
(VI)
other emission control procedures
fully enclosed treatment lines.

2.13.3.4 Waste gas treatments

The following cleaning systems are used:

droplet separators which use a fill material to condense aerosols and droplets.
Condensate is usually treated in a waste water treatment plant.
exhaust air wet scrubbers. These may be:
o fibrous packing scrubbers with mats of fibrous packing
o moving bed scrubbers with a zone of mobile packing, usually low density plastic
spheres which are free to move between support grids
o packed bed scrubbers containing a fixed bed of variously shaped packing material
o impingement plate scrubbers
o spray towers.

Water or specific chemical solutions are sprayed into the wet scrubbers usually (but not always)
countercurrent to the gas flow.
Chapter 2
146 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Reduction of NO
X
could be achieved by selective reduction using NH
2
-X compounds (with X =
H, CN or CONH
2
) injected into the gas stream. The most common reducing agent is ammonia.
Both non-catalytic (SNCR) and catalytic (SCR) techniques exist.
These techniques and devices are described in more detail in the reference document on BAT in
the waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector [87,
EIPPCB,]

2.13.4 Noise

The loading and unloading of loose components during delivery in stillages and loading for
processing in barrels can give non-continuous peaks. Linishing and polishing generate
continuous levels. Both may have associated in-house health effects.

For occupational health and safety it is often necessary to install air extractors combined with
exhaust air scrubbers. The extractor motors and fans working at high rotational speeds can have
deleterious effects outside the site buildings [121, France, 2003].

Other noise sources include refrigeration systems, heating systems, delivery vehicles, etc. [158,
Portugal, 2004]

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 147
3 CURRENT CONSUMPTION AND EMISSION LEVELS FOR
THE SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALS AND PLASTICS

3.1 Introduction utilities and input materials

The most significant environment factors for surface treatment installations are energy and
water consumption the efficient use of raw materials, the emission of pollutants in waters, and
the production of hazardous wastes. The emission of pollutants into the air is of less
consequence.

Many factors determine the consumption of raw materials as well as the emission of pollutants
at these installations. There is some difficulty in producing comparable statistics for both
consumptions and emissions because of the large variation between installations: it is likely that
no two of the 18000 installations operated in the 15 EU Member States (EU-15) are similar
enough in design and customers to be directly comparable with one another on a like-for-like
throughput basis. The variations in the options for plant design are due to the large number of
the operating parameters, see Section 1.2. and the general introduction to Chapter 2. The most
important are: [104, UBA, 2003]
the input substrates (e.g. steel, non-ferrous metals, plastics, etc.)
the form of the workpieces (e.g. small components, wires, sheet metals, small and large
coils, pipes, complex assemblies)
the transport technology of the treatment (jig, barrel, continuous coil)
the cleaning technology (aqueous, alkaline, acid, electrochemical, etc.)
the technology for the manufacture of a metallic bright surface (pickling with
hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, acid mixtures, etc.)
the coating programme (e.g. copper, nickel, chromium, zinc, tin, alloys, combinations
of individual layers such as plating followed by electropainting)
the selection of individual coatings (chemical, electrolytic and process chemistry)
the post treatment systems (chromating type, other systems)
the rinsing technology
the waste water and waste gas purification technology.

The best starting point for determining consumptions and emissions for comparisons would be
on a throughput measure such as unit used per square metre treated. This would enable both
interplant comparisons and individual plants to monitor their performance when considering and
managing changes within the same plant. For surface treatments, the preferred basis would be
surface area treated. However, the differing sizes, shapes and complexity of the workpieces
and/or substrates make the accurate calculation of surface area difficult in all but the most
straightforward cases.

On the emission side, the situation appears simpler, as emission standards and measurements
exist. However, these are largely for end-of-pipe discharges. Relating discharge quantities to
throughput factors for accurate comparison would be best, but are again very difficult.

However, none of these problems should prevent benchmarks being set. Consumption data such
as energy usage can always be used in-house to monitor the individual installations ongoing
performance [112, Assogalvanica, 2003]. Other benchmarks can be derived that may be used on
an interplant basis. Material efficiency benchmarks are less complex to apply than surface-
related ones and are closely related to the economic efficiency of the process, for example see
Table 3.7 and examples in Annex 8.5. They can be derived by subtracting the amount of
material emitted in wastes and waste water from the total amount of metal input [127, Oekopol,
2003, BA, 2004 #123]. However, care must still be taken to ensure a like for like basis: there
may be other sources of the material within the installation, for example dissolution of substrate
such as zinc from zinc die castings in processing vats.
Chapter 3
148 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Some basic data are provided in this section. A set of studies on consumption and emission of
metals for ten reference plants in Germany are included in Annex 8.5

Data on the key environmental considerations, such as substances of concern emitted, are given
with process descriptions in Chapter 2.

Annex 8.3.1 provides examples of regulatory limits for various processes and countries.

3.2 Consumptions and emissions utilities

3.2.1 Energy

Energy sources and uses are described in Section 2.12.1

Energy losses from the surface area of heated process solutions
Energy losses from the surface area of heated process solutions related to processing
temperatures are shown in Figure 3.1, below. It demonstrates that the highest energy loss occurs
from the solution surface with air extraction and with liquid agitation. Air extraction above the
surface of process solutions enhances evaporation and thus the energy loss [3, CETS, 2002].
Processing
temperature
(C)
Without liquid agitation,
without air extraction
(W/m tank surface area)
Without liquid agitation,
with air extraction
(W/m tank surface area)
With liquid agitation,
with air extraction
(W/m tank surface area)
30 352 559 839
35 530 837 1209
40 757 1196 1677
45 1048 1635 2268
50 1426 2198 3012
55 1922 2910 3949
60 2587 3815 5129
65 3505 4973 6621
70 4824 6469 8521
75 6844 8436 10974
80 10279 11096 14212
85 17386 17386 21188
90 41412 41412 46023
Table 3.1: Energy losses at the surface of hot process solutions in watts/m
2
3.2.2 Water

Water is used directly for rinsing purposes, or as make-up for recirculating water rinse systems.
To a much lesser extent, it is required for making-up evaporation losses from process tanks and
the washing of filtration and heat-exchange equipment. It may also be used in cooling systems.
Note that unless water is recycled or re-used elsewhere, this consumption figure will be the
discharge figure to waste water treatment.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 149
The typical rinse-water usage for an example automated barrel zinc plating plant is [3, CETS,
2002]:

output 6 barrels/h
barrel length 1200 mm
throughput c. 500 kg/h depending on the components
plating electrolyte acid zinc, 33 g/l zinc
plating stages 5
zinc anode usage 20 25 tonnes/year
plating time 45 min
cascade rinsing
- post first stage cleaning 4 stages (with return of drag-out)
- post acid pickle 3 stages
- post electrolytic degreasing 3 stages [125, Ireland, 2003]
- post plating 5 stages
(with forced evaporation and drag-out return)
- post passivate 2 stages
overall rinse-water usage 600 - 1000 l/h.

Benchmarks for water usage are:

a cleaned effluent discharge of 50 l/m
2
of treated surface area and with effluent
containing less than 0.1 % of the metal used [8, Nordic-Council, 2002]
an industry benchmark of about 40 l/m
2
(personal communication from Surface
Engineering Association, UK)
a maximum of 8 l/m
2
at each rinse stage [121, France, 2003] [58, France, 2003]. This
equates to 40 l/m
2
with five rinse stages. is met by approximately 80 % of French
surface treatment companies where the volume of treatment vats is greater than 10m
3
.
Details of how this is calculated and rinse stage is defined are given in Section 4.1.3.1.
PCB manufacture is a significant area where theses figures may not be met (see Section
3.4.3.1).

3.2.3 Consumptions and emissions materials

3.2.3.1 Pretreatment degreasing

[104, UBA, 2003] The main emissions from aqueous degreasing processes are rinsing waters,
separated oil and used degreasing solutions. Their generation, as well as consumption of
degreasers, are determined by a number of factors which the operator can only partly influence.
Three factors are important for the consumption of chemicals and the appropriate generation of
waste water:

degree of pollution of the workpieces
service lifetime of the degreasing solution
recycling of rinsing water concentrates into the degreasing tank.

Chapter 3
150 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Table 3.2 shows the large differences which are found in practice. All the enterprises here have
similar coating programmes and are considered reference plants for good practice techniques.

Enterprise
Throughput of
treated surface (m
2
/yr)
Consumption of
cleaning agent (t/yr)
Specific consumption
(t/100000 m
2
)
1 158000 1.24 0.78
2 200000 12.8 6.4
3 63000 0.13 0.2
4 468000 12.4 2.6
5 66000 7 9.0
Table 3.2: Specific consumption of degreasing chemicals

The substantial differences show that it is difficult to set up generally valid consumption figures
for this production step.

Both separated oil and oil-saturated process solutions are produced. The quantity of the
separated oil is identical to the quantity of oil which is introduced with the workpieces.

Rinsing waters and used degreasing baths are usually disposed of together through a waste
water treatment system. It is assumed that all materials used in the cleaning solutions end up in
the waste water.

3.2.3.2 Pickling

There are wide differences in the data for the specific consumption of acids in pickling, see
Table 3.3. [104, UBA, 2003]

Enterprise
Throughput coated
surface (m
2
/yr)
Acid consumption (type and strength
of acid not known) (t/yr)
Acid consumption
t/100000 m
2
1 158000 24 15
2 200000 202 101
3 63000 21 33
4 468000 150 32
5 6000 1.3 2
Table 3.3: Specific consumption of pickling agent

In Denmark, a consumption of 5000 kg (96 %) H
2
SO
4
/100000 m
2
is usual. [73, BSTSA, ] (5
t/100000 m
2
, compared with Table 3.3).

The data in Table 3.4 show the metal dissolved from the substrate by the pickling action and
discharged as a percentage divided by the quantity of metal treated.

Process
Emission ratio
(%)
Copper pickling (copper and alloys) 0.013
Zinc pickling (zinc and alloys) 0.045
Stainless steel pickling (18 %Cr and 10 % Ni) 0.12
Copper printed circuit board etching 10
Stripping tin-lead 15
Aluminium etching 2
Table 3.4 Metal losses from pickling and related processes
[51, France, 2003]

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 151
3.2.3.3 Rinsing
See Section 3.2.2, above, and Sections 4.7.9 and 4.7.10.

3.2.3.4 Core surface treatments

These include not only the metals used, but also process chemicals (e.g. inorganic acid, alkalis
and salts) and proprietary additives (e.g. brighteners, anode metals and effluent treatment
chemicals). The loss of materials is mainly due to drag-out, but cleaning and maintenance
(especially of filtration equipment) leakage and spillage are small but significant contributors.

Coating (deposition) processes
The French water agencies have determined the emissions of pollutants for the principal uses in
surface treatment. These values are estimated without taking into account any techniques for
reducing or recycling pollution. Some of these may be over-estimated, especially for the printed
circuit board industry [51, France, 2003].

The data indicate the metal discharged as a percentage of metals used in the process (anodes,
salts, etc.).

Process
Emission
ratio (%)
Nickel (electrolytic) 19
Nickel (autocatalytic/chemical) 45
Nickel (phosphating) 55
Copper (electrolytic) 9
Copper (autocatalytic/chemical) 16
Zinc hot dip coating (not covered in this BREF) 6
Zinc (phosphating) 32
Cadmium (plating) 8
Chromium (hard) 40
Chromium (decorative) 52
Table 3.5: Metal losses from coating processes
[51, France, 2003]

There are similar differences for the specific electrolyte consumption with zinc electroplating.
[104, UBA, 2003] (It is important to specify the type of zinc bath. [73, BSTSA, ])
Enterprise
Throughput coated
surface (m
2
/yr)
Electrolyte consumption
(t/yr)
Specific electrolyte
consumption (t/100000 m
2
)
1 158000 38 24
2 200000 160 80
3 63000 6 9.5
4 468000 90 19.2
5 66000 15.3 23
Table 3.6: Specific consumption of electrolyte

Chapter 3
152 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
In Denmark, metal consumption for a hot acid zinc-bath is estimated to be 1500 kg Zn/100000
m
2
, if drag-out recovery is used (1.5t Zn/100000m
2
).

Installation Metal Metal input Metal in waste
Metal in waste
water
Metal
efficiency
I Zn kg/yr 4520 770 15 82.63
Zn % 100 17.04 0.33
II Zn kg/yr 10000 1830 0.75 81.69
Zn % 100 18.30 0.01
III Zn kg/yr 12500 2630 3.9 78.93
Zn % 100 21.04 0.03
IV Zn kg/yr 25200 4620 32 81.54
Zn % 100 18.33 0.13
Table 3.7 Efficiency benchmarks for different zinc plating installations
Oekopol: extract of installation database 2003 [127, Oekopol, 2003]

Autocatalytic nickel
There are many autocatalytic nickel processes with varying amounts of phosphorus, each with a
different life in terms of MTOs. The amount of nickel per litre is about 6g. With 8 MTOs and
plate out, up to 5 g/l results in a nickel use of 49g and residue of 5 g in the spent solution. The
nickel waste can be reduced by membrane electrolysis and the rest of the spent solution can be
reduced to about 3 g/l using steel cathodes. Current processes are being trialled with MTOs of
15 20. An MTO of 4 is not unusual and has a much lower efficiency. This makes calculating a
universal % efficiency very difficult (personal communication, CETS VOM).

Hexavalent chromium plating
Annex 8.6 gives details of a typical small decorative chromium line, with eco-rinse (see Section
4.7.4) and two counter-flow cascade rinses (which do not return to the eco-rinse). The material
efficiency has been measured as 52 %. Without eco-rinse, this would fall to 20 30 % (Collini,
GmbH).
Phosphating
Table 3.8 shows the efficiency of metal uptake in the applied phosphate layer and losses from a
typical modern tri-metal system for corrosion prevention, such as that used in the automotive
industry. Nickel efficiency may be in the range of 8 16 %.

Zn % Ni % Mn %
Process conditions
Process pH 1.3 to 1.7
Metal phosphate
solubility
95 98 96
Distribution of metals in a typical phosphating system
Efficiency of metal uptake
in phosphate corrosion
layer
40 8 21
Metal in waste water 7 55 25
Metal in phosphate sludge 53 37 54
Table 3.8 Phosphating efficiencies and losses in the automotive industry
[163, Gock and Schlmrosczyk, 2004]

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 153
Sludge production is inevitable with steel substrates at this pH, with an industry view that the
more Fe dissolved the better the coating. Phosphating on zinc gives hardly any sludge, and on
aluminium gives large amounts of cryolyte (a Na
3
AlF
6
).

Modern standard paint lines (over the last 10 15 years) will make use of countercurrent rinsing
usually with 2 or 3 stages. This technique has been responsible for massive water savings in
many companies. The rinses could be fed back, but generally there is too much liquid when the
make up chemicals are included.

There have been attempts to concentrate the rinsing waters using membrane techniques such as
reverse osmosis or electrodialysis. However, these give rise to pH control problems and
precipitation of phosphates, although H
3
PO
4
can be added. Electrodialysis has been trialled on
large lines, but has failed as process control of the solution is quickly lost, due to the
complicated solution kinetics. [164, Wittel, 2004]

Conclusions
Industry data in Table 3.9 demonstrate low material efficiencies except where financial factors
(such as for gold, silver) or environmental regulatory pressures (such as for cadmium) are
paramount. [3, CETS, 2002]. In these cases, higher efficiencies can be achieved by reducing
reworking and using techniques for drag-out and materials recovery, and many of these
techniques can be used with other processes (in general, see Sections 4.1.2, 4.6, 4.7, and 4.12).
Material efficiency data for modern zinc plating installations vary mainly with the form of the
workpieces and the transport technology used.

Process
Efficiency %
[29, EA, 2001-3]
Efficiency %
[3, CETS, 2002]
Comments on data
Zinc plating (all
processes)
90
95 for coil coating
[119, Eurofer, 2003]
70 80
70 % is likely with
passivation (when Zn is
redissolved by the acid
chromating),
80 % without passivation
Nickel plating
(closed loop)
95
(without recycle) 80 85
(with recycle) 95

Autocatalytic nickel
plating
95
(excluding losses in spent
solutions)
95(excluding spent baths)
This varies widely according
to process type, specification
to be met and MTOs and is
very difficult to define (see
Section 2.5.8 and comments
in this section)
Copper plating
(cyanide process)
95 80
Tin and tin alloys 95 95
Chromium plating
(closed loop)
95
96
15 (without recycle)
Low efficiency (25 30 %)
without recovery confirmed
(Annex 8.6)
Precious metal
plating
98 98
Cadmium 99 99
Phosphating 90
Zn 40 %, Ni 8 -.16 %,
Mn 21 % are typical values
achieved and there is a lack of
data desribing techniques
accounting for the wide range
between column 2 and Tbale
3.8
Anodising 90
Electroplating
pigment, (i.e.
electropainting)
98
Table 3.9: Process efficiencies with respect to input materials

Chapter 3
154 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
3.3 Overall emissions

3.3.1 Waste water

Overall
Information about waste water discharges from several sources has been reviewed.

Source Data type Sample type
ACEA
Phosphating discharges from three
automotive production installations
According to local regulation,
i.e. German or UK.
CETS
Netherlands
One installation: review of data over six
years
Daily composites
Finland Two installations treating for phosphate
France
Review of unannounced sampling over
the period 2002 2003 for more than ten
surface treatment installations
representing the range of activities in the
BREF.
Daily composites
Germany 419 samples taken
According to the German
sampling regulations
Netherlands One installation Spot samples for a year
Nordic
Council
Summary data from a BAT assessment
study

Sweden
Analytical and annual emission reports for
nine installations, both contract and in-
house
Daily and monthly flow-
proportional composites
UK Review of 30 IPPC applications Mainly spot samples
Table 3.10: Data sources and types for waste water discharges

The individual sources are discussed in more detail, below. The data are summarised at the end
of this subsection, and in Table 3.20. This includes the derivation of emission ranges associated
with potential BAT.

The data focuses on the emission values of substances, and the ranges found. There are number
of examples of high outliers. However, it is also important when considering an installation to
look at the overall load discharged per day (or per other period, such as year). In some cases, it
has been possible to identify that unusually high emission values are associated with relatively
low loads. Also, it can be seen that loads may not vary significantly, even where there are high
outliers to the associated emission values.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 155
As can be seen from the sources (above) there is a large variation in the source and type of data
and the sampling and analysis used. The analysis of the data (below) shows:

some data provided has already been summarised, some not. It is not possible to draw
overall conclusions about the reliability, repeatability and accuracy of data, as well as
confidence intervals
little information on likely errors in the data provided
each installation has differences which are not fully given (including potential BAT used)
for:
o size and throughput
o production lines layout
o rinsing and other in-process control techniques
o chemicals
o waste water treatment
no data is given for the:
o age of installation or significant processes
o percentage of full capacity of each production process
o capacities and relative contributions where there is more than one production process,
o geographic location and local environmental conditions (except see below: ACEA
information on discharge to public sewer, and Swedish discharges containing phosphate
and aluminium to public sewer).

ACEA
ACEA submitted data from three phosphating plants (prior to painting), shown in Table 3.11.
The samples are taken according to local regulations (Germany and the UK). The discharges
from the surface treatment activities on these large plants are combined with effluents from
other sources: the contributors have taken account of the dilution given. ACEA comment that
discharges from these plants are to public sewer (PS) and these values take into account local
environmental conditions, including treatment in municipal waste water treatment plants. They
also comment that suspended solids is relevant for effluent discharges, not settleable solids.
Settleable solids is used internally for the operator's process control.

PS
mg/l
Type of sample (e.g. spot or 2 hour or daily composite), dilution by
and types of non-PO
4
effluents included in sample
Nickel
0.99

Batch WWT process so batch samples. Dilution minimal, about 5 % is
non-STM effluent.
COD
600 - 1400
(plant 1) or
2000 (plant 4)
Composite samples, sampled after the waste water treatment plants, so
diluted by non-STM processes, give range 600 - 1400mg/l (plant 1).
Spot samples from 2002 (for plant 3) as high as 1100mg/l.
Plant 4 WWT batches sampled, giving 2000mg/l.
HC total
Estimate
composite:
2.7 - 20,
average 8
(plant 3)

22.5 (plant 4)
Data is oil/grease expressed as non-volatile matter extracted by 40/60
petroleum spirit. Spot samples average 24mg/l (range 8 - 61)

Similarly, oil and grease data for plant 4 = 22.5mg/l (Determined by
acidification and extraction with tetrachloroethylene. The samples are
passed through columns containing florisil and magnesium sulphate and
the resulting extracts are quantified by Fourier Transform Spectroscopy.)
VOX 0.3
Annual mean values based on random sampling. Sampling at point of
discharge to river, so concentration is reduced due to dilution from other
sources. We/the authorities calculate with a dilution factor of 10, which
has already been applied to give 0.3mg/l (plant 5).
Settleable
solids
30 - 100
Composite samples after the waste water treatment plants, so diluted by
non-STM processes (1).
Table 3.11: ACEA emission values for phosphating plants

Chapter 3
156 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
CETS Netherlands
CETS Netherlands (VOM) provided data ranges for a large contract plating shop, with both
electro- and electroless plating. The samples reviewed were flow-proportional daily samples.
The range of emission values are given in Table 3.11. Data was also supplied on total metals
loads and total volumes for several years. Flow has been approximately halved, with the
introduction of more cascade rinsing and changing one nickel barrel plating line to electroless
nickel. However, loads have stayed broadly the same (apart from the effect of the overall
economic situation of the industry). This is attributed to the difficulty in older process lines of
finding space to increase the number of cascade rinsing stages. Also, it was commented that it is
not possible to achieve the lowest levels for all metals simultaneously, or for any metal 100 %
of the time. This may be due to different loading on different lines, some process chemical
interference or the physico-chemical chemical characteristics of the waste water treatment plant
(for example, see differing metal solubilities, Figure 2.44). See also German data, below.

Annual
flow m
3
Annual metal
load k/yr*
Mean daily load
kg/day
Comments
1979 to 1997 9032 20 0.084
1998 9244 12.5 0.053
2000 10233 26 0.109
Changes in rinses and processes
implemented
2002 5607 14.5 0.052
Abnormally low throughput due
to sector economic situation
2003 5881 10.5 0.042
*Metals are: Total Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn, Sn, Pb. 238 working days a year
Table 3.12: CETS Netherlands (VOM) Flow and load data for a contract plater

Finland
Ranges for phosphate emissions were given for two Finnish reference plants based on average
daily composite samples for installations using potential BAT to treat phosphate (see Section
4.16.8.2)

Reference plant 1 Reference plant 2
Process
First stage:
Separate precipitation with Ca(OH)
2
for
waste waters coming from phosphating (10
m
3
/h).
Second stage:
Treat the residues from first stage together
with other waste waters (5 m
3
/h) from a
surface treatment installation. This includes
hydroxide precipitation and sand filtration
and after both treatments waste waters are
discharged into public sewer
Waste waters coming from
an anodising plant are
treated by precipitation
Discharge to:
Combined flows discharged to public sewer
(PS)
Discharged into surface
water (SW)
Ranges 0.4 2.5 mg/l as total phosphorus
0.03 0.41 mg/l as total
phosphorus
Proposed range 0.5 - 4.0 mg/l as total
phosphorus
Table 3.13: Finnish phosphate emission values

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 157
France
In France, for many years national policy has been to discharge waste water from surface
treatment installations to surface water after complete treatment on site. Discharge to municipal
waste water treatment plant is only considered after a detailed analysis including biodegradation
studies, and must achieve an additional reduction in pollution [121, France, 2003].

France reviewed daily composite samples from unannounced (unexpected) sampling during the
years 2002 to 2003. These were for more than ten surface treatment installations chosen to
represent the range of activities in this BREF. The summarised data is shown in Table 3.20.

Germany
Currently, in Germany approximately 94 % of the surface treatment industry discharges its
waste water into local sewerage systems. [104, UBA, 2003] Pretreatment is required in the
installation prior discharging. In the case of physico-chemical pretreatment the toxic anions
(such as cyanide) in the sewage are destroyed and heavy metals are removed to the required
standard. Further treatment is given in the local biological municipal water treatment plant.

By using state of the art water-saving rinsing techniques and by multi-stage waste water
treatment plants, both the waste water amount and the pollutant concentration in the cleaned
waste water can be minimised. The load of pollutants from surface treatment into the waters is
small, as Table 3.14 and the reference plants in Annex 8.5 show:

Enterprise
Coated surface
m
2
/y
Zinc load
kg/y
Chromium
load
kg/y
Specific zinc
load kg/100000 m
2
Specific
chromium load
kg/100000 m
2
I 63000 3036 0.910 4600 1370
II 158000 3900 1120 2470 0.709
Table 3.14: Heavy metal loads from electroplating installations to municipal sewerage systems
[104, UBA, 2003]
Germany has provided data on nine reference plants (see Annex 8.5). Table 3.15shows the
percentage of input metal that is discharged from each reference plant after waste water
treatment (the data sets are not complete for all plants).

Reference
Plant
Chromium
%
Copper
%
Nickel
%
Zinc
%
Overall
metals
discharged as
%of input
A 0.05 0.05 0.05
C 0.032 0.14 0.008 0.02
D Insufficient data
E 0.007 0.007
F 0.05
(estimated)
0.008 0.01
G 0.037 0.037
H 0.015 0.015
K Zero discharge
L 0.002 0.002
Ranges 0.32 - 0.48 0.05 - 0.14 0.008 - 0.05 0.002 - 0.037 0.002 - 0.037
Table 3.15:German reference plants in Annex 8.5: percentage of input metals discharged in waste water

These data broadly show metals outputs to waste water as a percentage of metal inputs of 0.002
to 0.037 %. These levels are significantly lower than the Norwegian value (see below). Exact
details are not known, but the waste water treatment plants may be optimised for one of the
metals, such as zinc or nickel, as in two cases where more than one metal is used, the least used
metal is the least efficiently recovered or removed (see also CETS Netherlands).
Chapter 3
158 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Germany also supplied 429 details of samples taken of waste water discharges. The samples
were taken according to the German sampling regulations. These data are summarised in Table
3.16.

Cr total
mg/l
Cu
mg/l
Ni
mg/l
Zn
mg/l
CN free
mg/l
Number of samples reported
for the metal
398 419 399 419 116
Maximum mg/l 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.9 0.11
Minimum mg/l <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.05
Median mg/l 0.125 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.04
Average mg/l 0.181 0.207 0.215 0.972 0.046
Standard deviation (SD) 0.109 0.123 0.116 0.368 0.024
95 % confidence interval
(1.96SD)
0.214 0.241 0.227 0.721 0.047
Max value for 95 %
confidence
0.395 0.448 0.442 1.693 0.093
99 % confidence interval
(3.29SD)
0.359 0.405 0.382 1.211 0.079
Max value for 99 %
confidence
0.54 0.612 0.597 2.183 0.125
Note: calculated using Excel and assuming average equates to mean value.
Table 3.16: Summary data from German surface treatment waste water samples
UBA

From these data it can be seen that the average and median values are generally well below the
mid-point given by averaging the two extremes of the ranges: the exception is zinc. This
suggests that there is a skewed distribution. It is important to note that the actual average
discharge as an instantaneous value or load lies well below the theoretical mid-point between
the range values in most cases. The 95 % and 99 % confidence values show the value to be set
to cover respectively 95 % and 99 % of values in the range. For example, for zinc, a value of
2.183 mg/l covers the full expected range of values with 99 % confidence, while for chromium
it is 0.54 mg/l.

The Netherlands
The data set summarised in Table 3.17 is for 312 spot samples from one factory for 2003. The
company specialise in hard anodising, chemical nickel, silver plating, tin plating as well as other
finishes. The average values are very low, and the median values frequently zero. The standard
deviations are significantly larger than the averages. Interestingly, the range maximum for
nickel and the 99 % confidence level are the same as the limit value. The maximum and 99 %
confidence value for aluminium are also close to the limit value. The values for chromium are
less close, but for this data set, the data show that for an average of 0.127 mg/l (which is again
low) and 99 % compliance can be achieved at 1.059 mg/l.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 159
Al Pb Zn Cu Cr Ni Daily
volume
Limit value
Units
20
mg/l

mg/l
0.7
mg/l
1.5
mg/l
1.5
mg/l
1.5
mg/l
15
m
Samples per
determinand
(maximum 312)
303 302 302 302 302 303 312
Max 19.500 0.070 0.358 0.245 1.500 1.500 81
Min 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0
Median 1.958 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.174 26.5
Average 3.165 0.003 0.004 0.011 0.127 0.323 26
Standard Deviation 3.553 0.011 0.026 0.035 0.238 0.386 19.64
95 %confidence level 10.264 0.022 0.025 0.067 0.585 1.274 55.45
99 % confidence level 19.122 0.067 0.069 0.181 1.059 1.500 72
Table 3.17: Summary data for waste water samples for a Netherlands factory
Note: calculated using Excel and assuming average equals mean value.

Nordic Council
In the Nordic countries, an investigation of installations using good practice derived a
benchmark figure of a treated effluent discharge of 50 l/m
2
of treated surface area with an
effluent containing less than 0.1 % of the metal used [8, Nordic-Council, 2002].

Sweden
The policy in Sweden is similar to France: surface treatment installations treat their effluent for
discharge to surface water. The exceptions are effluents high in aluminium and phosphate,
which are usually required to discharge to municipal waste water treatment plant. Regulatory
control is based on load per year, with guidance values for emission limit values. These are
based on daily and monthly flow - proportional composites.

Raw data were supplied for nine installations. They are a range of contract and in-house
installations, and of typical sizes for the sector: usually two or three production lines and 25 to
100 m
3
per day discharges. The samples were for daily or monthly averages, according to the
priority for control: daily samples for substances such as cyanide, where impact is instantaneous
and monthly where load was more critical. The data is summarised in Table 3.18. When
examining the data, where the maxima data were found, it was possible to calculate the daily
load based on average flows (individual daily flows were not available). For aluminium, the
next highest value has also been given to show the outlying nature of the highest values. These
all imply the daily load to be relatively small, and that the occasional high value does not have a
great impact on the annual load figure (or average daily load). This suggests that the mean
(averages) and the median for these data would also be well below the value mid-way between
the range maximum and the range minimum, as for the data from Germany and Netherlands.

The ranges for daily and monthly samples are usually similar and have been combined to form
one range in most cases. The ranges for surface water discharges and public sewer discharges to
waste water treatment plant have also been combined where there is little practical difference:
they have been kept separate where there is a significant difference and for aluminium, where
there are reasons to consider the ranges separately.

Chapter 3
160 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Determinand
(and Swedish
advisory limit
values)
Surface Water (SW) Public Sewer
Combined
range
Load kg per day
associated with
highest emission
value
Daily
composite
sample
Monthly
composite
sample
Daily
composite
sample
Monthly
composite
sample

Ag mg/l (0.1) 0.013 - 0.019 - - - 0.013 - 0.019 -
Al mg/l - <0.2 - 75 17 -120 <0.002 - 230
SW <0.2 - 75
(next highest 0.67)
PS <0.002 - 230
SW 0.291
(next highest 0.001)
PS 0.341
CN free mg/l (0.1) <0.01 - 0.17 - - - <0.01 - 0.17
CN total mg/l
(1.0)
<0.01 - 0.26 - - - <0.01 - 0.26
Cr VI mg/l (0.1) <0.01 - 0.18 - <0.02 - 0.11 <0.02 - 0.02 <0.1 - 0.18 0.0005
Cr total mg/l
(0.05)
- <0.01 - 1.5 - <0.01 - 0.28 <0.01 - 1.5 0.008
Cu mg/l (0.05) - <0.01 - 0.8 - - <0.01 - 0.8 0.063
Fe mg/l - 0.06 - 1.2 0.08 - 1.5 - 0.06 - 1.5 0.071
Ni mg/l (0.05) - <0.03 - 2.1 - <0.04 - 0.31 <0.03 - 2.1 0.046
Phosphate
as P0
4
mg/l
0.11 - 2.6 1.1 - 20 - 0.02 - 5.1 0.11 - 20 0.017
Pb mg/l (0.05) - <0.05 - <0.1 - - <0.05 - <0.1
Sn mg/l (1.0) - 0.2 - 30 - -
0.2 - 30 (next
highest 2.4)
0.002
Zn mg/l (0.05 -
2.0)
- 0.01 - 1.3 - <0.01 - 0.62 0.01 - 1.3 0.025
COD mg/l 110 - 240 - - - 110 - 240
Total extractable
aliphatic material
mg/l
<1 - 15 - - -

Total extractable
aromatic material
mg/l
<1 - 32 - - -
<1 - 15
<1 32

Range for total
extractable organic
material <1 - 32

Suspended
solids mg/l
(10 for SW)
<5 - 17 <5 - 25 <5 - 710 5 - 10
SW <5 - 25
PS <5 - 710

Table 3.18: Summary of Swedish waste water data from nine installations

The United Kingdom
Data were compiled from 37 IPPC permit applications. Of these sites: 4 only released
aluminium to public sewer, one discharged to surface water at very low levels, two were so
small that the effluent was tankered away. The remaining 30 sites all discharged to public sewer
after effluent treatment. Regulation in the UK is usually with instantaneous emission limit
values, although load per day is taken into consideration. The data is based on a mixture of spot
samples, averages of spot samples over a period of time, and some composite samples. The data
are summarised in Table 3.19. It is not known if the peak values are for spot samples, but a
range derived from spot samples are likely to show higher values than composite samples (see
data from Germany). The new benchmark value is included.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 161
Metal
Number of sites
discharging metal in
sample of 30 sites
Minimu
m mg/l
Maximu
m mg/l
normal
range mg/l
IPPC
benchmark
value
(Oct 04)
Chromium (total) 17 0.1 5 1 to 3 1
Copper 6 0.25 3 0.25 to 1 1
Lead 7 <0.01 0.2 0.05 to 0.15 1
Nickel 10 0.1 5 0.2 to 1 1
Silver 1 0.1 - - 0.1
Tin 1 2 - - 2
Zinc 16 0.01 8 0.2 to 6 2
Table 3.19: UK data for emission values to waste water from 30 IPPC permit applications

3.3.1.1 Conclusions for waste water emissions

Overall comments
The ranges of emissions discussed above are summarised in Table 3.20. Benchmark (reference)
emission values have been derived from this data, as representing the current performance of the
installations discussed above, using a selection of techniques such as those described in Chapter
4 describes for:

minimisation of water and material discharged from the processes (see Sections 4.5, 4.6,
4.7)
treating waste water (see Section 4.16).

However, it should be noted that it can become difficult to maintain stable pH values in the
narrow margins required to minimise the solubility of individual metals when dealing with a
mixture. The reduction in the volumes of water can also increase the concentration of dissolved
salts and the various metals. Both these factors can increase the solubility of metals in the waste
water treatment. This demonstrates that when a applying a number of potential BAT in the
process and the end-of-pipe treatment, it is not possible to optimise for every parameter, i.e. to
minimise all metals discharged, maximise their retention in-process and reducing water
consumption (see Section 4.16).

The amount of metals discharged as a percentage of the input metals varies between 0.002 and
0.1 %. The limited data indicates that this will be dependent on the in-process and waste water
treatment techniques, as well as the combination of process techniques and metals used. The
retention and/or removal efficiency is independent of the proportion of the metal used where
there is more than one process, showing that it may not be possible to optimise the system to
reduce all components discharged equally (see cadmium and mercury, below).

Examples of applying a mixture of both minimisation and treatment techniques is described in
the reference plants in Annex 8.5 [123, UBA, 2004], and in reports on sites visited [Tempany,
2002 #18].

The emission values associated with potential BAT derived here reflect the current performance
of some installations in the sector (where data has been provided). However, they are not limit
values (see the Preface and introduction to Chapter 5). Some limit values are included in the
discussion above for reference. Some typical emission limits for some European countries are
given in Table 8.2 and Table 8.3, Annex 8.3. Values are also given for PARCOM 92/4 and
HELCOM 23/7 recommendations, and for metals limits in the Drinking Water Directive
98/83/EC. The benchmark ranges in Table 3.20 largely fall within the limit values.

Chapter 3
162 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The emission values associated with potential BAT are expected for samples that are daily
composites:

taken after treatment and before any kind of dilution before discharge
unfiltered prior to analysis.

When considering the values, weighting has been given to daily composite samples and outliers
have been discarded. As discussed in individual data sets, what cannot be seen in range values is
that, in many cases, the average values used for load calculations will be towards the low end of
the range.

Cadmium and mercury
Both are controlled by other legislation. Cadmium is used in the sector, but in a limited number
of installations and under tight controls. It is also present as a contaminant; particularly in all
zinc anodes (see Section 2.5.4). Low levels can sometimes be detected and this supports the
argument that metals are not retained or removed in proportion to their usage in the plant.
Mercury is not used in this sectors processes, but may be present due to contamination in
caustic soda produced by mercury cell chlor-alkali processes.

Other metals
Silver has been assumed to be towards the low end of the limited data range available, for cost
reasons (see Section 4.11). Concentrations of aluminium are only important to surface water
discharges (see 4.17.3), so a range has been derived on this basis. For chromium, copper, nickel
and zinc the data shows that the installations considered operate within these ranges (excluding
some outlying results), although for individual sites, the average data may be towards the
bottom of the range. The iron range is only applicable to surface water discharges.

Fluoride
A range for surface waters has been derived from French data.

COD
A range for surface waters has been derived from French data.

Phosphates
The range here is derived for only for effluents discharging to surface water (see Section
4.18.8.2).

Hydrocarbons
For these substances, definitions and analytical methods vary between sources. A range for
surface waters is derived from French data.

VOX
There is data for surface waters from France and public sewer from ACEA.

Solids
Some Member States use suspended solids (such as Sweden) and others use settleable solids
(such as France). There is no data for any relationship between these values. The range has been
derived for surface waters data from France and Sweden: both these ranges are close, but the top
of the range has been raised slightly to account for any differences.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 163
All values are
mg/l
France Finland UK Germany Sweden NL
CETS
VOM
ACEA
Emission levels associated
with potential BAT
Note:
PS = Public
sewer
SW=surface
water
>10 plants 2 plants
Normal
range 30
plants
1 plant 9 plants 1 plant 1 plant
Discharges to
PS
3 plants
PS or SW
Additional
determinands
applicable to
surface waters
(SW) only
Ag 0.1 0.5 0.01 - 0.02 LoD - 2.0 0.1 0.5
Al 1 5.0
<0.02 - 6.7 (SW)
<0.02 - 230 (FS)
<0.1 - 19.5 1 10
Cd 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2
CN free
0.1 0.2
<0.02 -
<0.28
<0.01 - 0.17 0.01 0.2
Cr(VI) 0.1 0.2 <0.01 - 0.18 0.1 0.2
Cr total 0.5 2.0 1 3 <0.1 - 0.5 <0.01 - 1.5 <0.1 - 1.5 0.02 - 0.1 0.1 2.0
Cu 0.5 2 0.25 3.0 <0.1 - 0.5 <0.01 - 0.8 <0.1 - 1.5 LoD - 2.8 0.2 2.0
F 10 20 10 20
Fe 1 5
0.06 - 1.2 (SW)
0.06 - 1.2 (FS)
0.1 to 5
Hg <0.05 0.01 0.05
Ni 0.5 2 0.2 1.0 <0.1 - 0.3 <0.03 - 2.1 <0.1 - 1.5 0.02 - 2.7 0.99 0.2 2.0
Phosphate as P 5 10 0.03 2.5 0.11 - 0.62 0.5 10
Pb 0.2 1 0.05 0.15 <0.05 - <0.1 All <LoD 0.05 0.5
Sn 1 2 0.2 - 2.4 0.3 - 2 0.2 2
Zn 0.5 2.0 0.2 6.0 <0.5 - 1.5 0.01 - 1.3 <0.1 - 0.4 0.5 - 1.4 0.2 2.0
COD 150 500 110 - 240 600 - 2000 100 500
HC Total 1 5 (PS
or SW)
2.7 - 20
(average 8)
1 5
VOX 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.5
Solids 5 20
<5 - 25 (SW)
<5 - 710 (FS)
30 - 100
5 30
(for discharges to
surface waters)
Table 3.20: Summary data for emission ranges to water including values associated with potential BAT
Chapter 3
164 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
3.3.2 Waste

There are several types of waste (see Section 1.4.4.10). An overview of the consumption of
materials to processes and emissions, particularly to waste and waste water are given in Section 3.1.
For most surface treatment shops the most significant waste is the solids (sludge) produced in the
waste water treatment plant, and the amount produced is directly linked to the material
consumptions and process efficiencies, and more details of these are given in 3.2.3.

The sludge or filter cake is usually concentrated by batch pressure filter and contains 60 80 %
water, depending upon the maximum filtration pressure and sludge composition [104, UBA, 2003].
Aluminium hydroxide sludges from anodising generally do not go below 75 % water content [118,
ESTAL, 2003]. The addition of flocculating agents can aid water extraction (see Section 4.16.7.3).
At this water content, the filter cake has a dry appearance and is easily friable. The sludge contains
dirt, small quantities of insoluble inorganic salts, organic compounds and metals removed
(dissolved) from the surface of workpieces or substrate and chemicals, including dissolved metals,
carried over from the treatment processes. The dissolved metals are usually precipitated as
hydroxides, including Fe(II) and Fe(III) hydroxides and oxides dissolved from steel substrates, or
aluminium dissolved from the substrate in anodising precipitated as alumina. Phosphating process
waste is mainly iron manganese or zinc phosphate. These can form large proportions of the sludge.
The sludge is usually considered to be hazardous waste, and the industry produces in the order of
300000 tonnes of hazardous waste a year in Europe
4
(approximately 16 tonnes a year per
installation) [92, EC, 1991, 100, EC, 2000] and requires managing according to the appropriate
regulations [93, EC, 2000, 103, EC, 1991].

Filter cake can be dried to a lower water content to reduce transport and disposal costs. It does
however, become dusty when the water content is less than 40 %. See Section. 2.13.2.2.

The amount of sludge generated depends on the one hand on the condition of the workpieces, and
on the other hand on specific process factors during the electroplating process.

The substantial factors are:

input of pollutions
erosion of metal oxides from the workpieces surface
drag-out of process solution with the workpieces
conversion from layers of metal, for example with chromating
service lifetime of the process solutions.

From the quantity of the metals used in the electroplating shops in Germany and the drag-out
occurring, the amount of electroplating sludge from all the galvanic shops can be estimated. Taking
an annual metal usage of 20000 t/yr as a basis, with a drag-out rate of 20 %/t/yr, a metal loss of
4000 t can be calculated. Assuming that the metals are present as sulphates and are precipitated by
means of classical lime precipitation:

MSO
4
+ Ca (OH)
2
YM(OH)
2
+ CaSO
4
(M = metal)
And presupposing that the sludge has a water content of 70 %, then the ratio of metal to sludge is a
factor of roughly 1:10. This means approximately 10 tonnes of electroplating sludge result per
tonne of lost metal. Consequently, in Germany 40000 t of electroplating sludge is generated by non-
ferrous metal losses.

4
This derived from an industry estimate of <1 % of hazardous waste in Europe and the Eurostat figures from hazardous waste
management in the EU-15.
Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 165
An investigation on consumptions and emissions for 1998 - 2000 has been carried out in 13 nickel
electroplating shops in northern Italy. All of the shops produce filter cake from batch pressure
filters. The usual water content is about 70 % wt; the content of nickel in the sludges ranges
between 1800 and 42000 mg/kg; the emission factor (nickel emitted to sludge/total nickel used)
ranges between 40 and 80 g/kg (4 to 8 %) [112, Assogalvanica, 2003]. This is slightly less than the
German ratio.

In addition to the German estimation, it is necessary to take into account the metals arising from the
metal processes prior to electroplating, in particular pickling. Here, however, the estimation is
difficult, since the condition of the delivered workpieces, which is an important factor, is unknown.
In view of these uncertainties, the amount of electroplating sludge can be only estimated. For the
total number of electroplating shops in Germany, 70000 to 80000 t/yr seems realistic.

In 2003, in Germany, approximately 30 % of the electroplating sludge was used as a secondary raw
material in the non-ferrous metal industry. The remainder was disposed of in hazardous waste
landfills. The efficiency of the non-ferrous metal in utilising the sludge is not taken into account: it
is not 100 % and may be as low as 70 % [165, Tempany, 2004].

Some service solutions reaching the end of their life are disposed of directly as liquid wastes. They
may be returned to the producers for recycling (for instance, copper etchants in printed circuit board
manufacture) or managed off-site as hazardous liquid wastes, e.g. used process solutions containing
cadmium, cyanides, autocatalytic nickel solution, and/or complexing agents, etc. [121, France,
2003].

3.3.3 Air emissions

Overall
The surface treatment of metals and plastics is not a major source of emissions to air [104, UBA,
2003] and these emissions are not a significant contribution to trans-boundary problems such as
acid rain. However, local air quality may be an issue for some installations (for instance, NO
X
in
urban areas). Techniques and reasons for controlling emissions to air are discussed Section 4.15.

Some materials used in the processes have adverse health effects and their atmospheric
concentrations in the workplace are usually controlled by health and safety legislation. Where
workplace conditions and regulations require, these substances will need control, also by the
techniques discussed in Section 4.15, such as by air extraction. Some substances may also be
corrosive to buildings, equipment and workpieces or substrates in storage and require control to
prevent unnecessary corrosion, damage and reworking (see Section 4.3.1.2).

Table 3.21 lists some substances and/or activities whose fugitive emissions may have local
environmental impacts in some situations and are highlighted in the specific sections of Chapters 2
and 4.
Chapter 3
166 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Type of solution
or activity
Solutions needing air extraction
In all cases:
Cyanide
Cadmium
Hexavalent
chromium
Solutions which are used for electroplating, and/or are heated and/or are agitated with air
Nickel solutions Solutions agitated with air
Ammonia
Solutions emitting ammonia, either where ammonia is a component or a breakdown
product
Dust producing
activities such as
polishing and
linishing

Using insoluble
anodes
In all solutions hydrogen and/or oxygen are formed and there is a risk of deflagration,
see individual processes and techniques in Chapters 2 and 4.
Acid solutions
Solutions not needing extraction Solutions needing extraction
Processes
containing nitric
acid with emissions
of NO
X
Processes for the surface treatment of
metals which are likely to result in the
release into the air of any acid-
forming oxide of nitrogen include:
chemical brightening of aluminium
bright dipping or chemical
polishing of copper alloys
pickling using nitric acid, which
may also contain hydrofluoric acid
in-situ cleaning using nitric acid
chemical stripping using nitric acid
Pickling and
stripping using
hydrochloric acid
Hydrochloric acid used at ambient temperatures
and concentrations below 50 vol % technical
grade with water generally does not evolve HCl
gas or fumes which require extraction for health
and safety reasons
Hydrochloric acid used at higher
concentrations and/or at elevated
temperatures generates significant
releases of HCl gas or fume which
requires extraction for health and
safety reasons and to prevent
corrosion in the workplace
Pickling and
stripping using
sulphuric acid
Sulphuric acid used at temperatures below
60 C generally does not evolve acid mists
which require extraction for health and safety
reasons
Sulphuric acid used at temperatures
above 60 C releases a fine aerosol of
the acid which requires extraction for
health and safety reasons and to
prevent corrosion in the workplace
Pickling using
hydrofluoric acid
In all cases
Alkali solutions
Aqueous alkaline
cleaning
Alkaline cleaning chemicals are non-volatile
and do not require fume extraction for health
and safety reasons or local environmental
protection
Alkaline cleaning tanks operating
above 60 C can generate significant
amounts of water vapour which may
be extracted for operator comfort and
to prevent corrosion
Table 3.21: Solutions and activities which may require prevention of fugitive emissions

Information about air emissions data has been reviewed from several sources and is summarised in
Table 3.22:

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 167
Source Data type Sample type
Austrian industry
Two large barrel lines Regulatory measurements made
for control by standard methods
CETS Netherlands
One installation (the same as in
Section 3.3.1)
Regulatory measurements made
for control by standard methods
CETS UK
One major chromium plating
contractor
One regulatory measurement
made by standard methods
Germany Ten installations
Sweden
Six installations, 14 sample
points
Regulatory measurements made
for control by standard methods
Table 3.22: Data sources and types for air emissions

Austrian industry

Examples of air emissions from two large production lines with three processes are given in Table
3.23.

Processes and emissions Alkaline zinc barrel line Copper/nickel barrel line
Process type and size
16 baths in the process line
26 m
3
alkaline zinc bath
with insoluble anodes
9 baths
28 m
3
cyanide copper
18 baths
58 m
3
Watts type
nickel
Exhaust air treatment
Water scrubber Cyanide air stream
washed in an alkaline
air scrubber
Extraction of
water droplets to
heat exchanger.
Condensate to
waste water
treatment.
Volume of emitted air
Nm
3
/h
37700 27800 12200

Zinc emitted mg/Nm
3
0.048 0.071
Zinc load emitted g/h 2.2
Copper emitted mg/Nm
3
<0.01
Copper load emitted g/h
<2.78
Cyanide emitted mg/Nm
3
0.11 0.16
Cyanide load emitted g/h 3.75
Nickel in the emitted air
mg/Nm
3
<0.01 0.011
Nickel load emitted g/h 0.134
Dust emitted mg/Nm
3
<1 4.0 <1 <1
Table 3.23: Emissions to air from alkali zinc barrel and copper-nickel barrel lines, Austria
Collini Gmbh, Austria

CETS Netherlands
Emission measurements taken during 2001 for regulation at a large contract surface treatment
installation in the Netherlands are given in Table 3.24. The same installation supplied waste water
emissions data given in Section 3.3.1.

Chapter 3
168 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Substance
Process details and
comments
Measured value
(mg/m
3
)
Range (mg/m
3
) Flow m
3
/h
Nickel
Electroless nickel,
with wet scrubber
0.014 - 0.039 2450
Copper
Air agitated bath
1.7m
3
, no scrubber
0.001 3320
Ammonia
Electroless nickel,
with wet scrubber.
Adding 1kg/h to
process solution
<LoD - 9.2
Cyanide Nickel stripping <LoD
No figure
available
Cyanide
Silver cyanide, low
temperature
Agitation by pumps,
no scrubbers
<LoD 2.7 1847
HCl 1
Chromium
including CrVI)
Mainly hard
chromium, using
PFOS (2 kg/yr)
Cr(VI): five
measurements at
0.0001
0.006 to 0.019
total Cr
2000
Ag <LoD
NOx
From stripping
nickel from plastics
(PDVF):

Before installation of
wet scrubber

After installation

9033 to 35450

<500

Note: LoD is limit of detection
Table 3.24: Emission to air CETS Netherlands
CETS VOM

CETS UK
Emissions to air from a large contract plating installation in the UK are given in Table 3.25. The
samples were taken according to methods given in the Annex 8.4.1.2. The data relate to a trivalent
chromium plating installation working 8 hour shifts.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 169
Source
Hydrochloric
acid tank 801
3x 0.9x0.9m
3
Hydrochloric
acid tank 225
3x 0.9x 0.9m
3
Hydrochloric
acid tank 100
3x 0.9x 0.9m
3
Hydrochloric
acid with bright
trivalent
chromium
2.5x0.8x1.2 m
3
Black trivalent
chromium
2.5x0.8x1.2 m
3
Emission
abatement
equipment
2 lip
extraction

No treatment
2 lip
extraction

No treatment
2 lip extraction

No treatment
2 lip extraction

No treatment
2 lip extraction

No treatment
Flowrate
(normalised)
Nm
3
/h
4418 1907 6031 5600 7189
Total
particulate
matter
mg/m
3
- 0.4 0.2
Chromium
(total)
mg/m
3
- <0.01 <0.01
HCl mg/m
3
0.6 4.2 0.6 1.3
Table 3.25: Emissions to air from trivalent chromium plating
CETS UK (SEA)

The emissions from a UK aluminium brightening installation are described in Annex 8.12. The
facility has automatic/semi-automatic brightening of aluminium prior to anodising. Processing line
is alkaline soak clean/degrease; brightener; hot smut removal; anodising, with rinses between,
using:

brightening solution 6 - 7 % of 70 % nitric acid (as supplied)
15 % sulphuric acid (supplied as 96 %)
78 - 79 % phosphoric acid (supplied as 50 %).

Air is extracted at 30000 m
3
/h through a scrubber. Most NO
2
is absorbed, leaving mainly NO which
is more difficult. Typical figures for NO
X
emitted after water scrubbing are 60 - 70 mg/m
3
Germany

Table 3.26 shows emission value for pickling plants and a hexavalent chromic plating line in
Germany [104, UBA, 2003],[NRW UBA]. Additional parameters are given, such as exhaust air
flowrate, composition of the pickles, etc. where this information is known. Simple emission control
procedures were used, such as exhaust scrubbers with fill materials and countercurrent scrubbing or
droplet separators. Note that each pickling plant differs in its pickling process chemistry.
A water scrubber is normally is sufficient for NO
X
(e.g. plant 5, Table 3.26). In order to reach the
German TA Luft emission value for HF (3 mg/m
3
) an alkaline scrubber is usually necessary. As a
consequence, where NO
X
is discharged, then a very low value for NO
X
is also reached (see plant 1,
2 and 10, Table 3.26). Plant 8 used HF and HNO
3
for the pickling baths; before they built their new
plant and changed the composition of the baths, they had problems in reducing levels to <3 mg/m
3
HF using a water scrubber without alkali. They now reach a low HF value and have eliminated NO
X
as the solution no longer uses nitric acid.

Chapter 3
170 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
HCl emission values in the range from 30 to 10 mg/m
3
can generally be reached using a water
scrubber. Values under 10 mg/m
3
are attainable with a water scrubber, however with the disbenefits
of significantly increased water consumption.

Very low emission values for Cr (VI) (0.001 - 0.011 mg/l) can be achieved using a mist
eliminator/aerosol. Low levels for Ni can also be reached, but no data have been supplied.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 171
Plant data Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4 Plant 5 Plant 6 Plant 7 Plant 8 Plant 9 Plant 10
Type and
size of baths
Pickling
8.2 m
3
Pickling
>10 m
3
Pickling
22 m
3
Pickling
~50 m
3
Pickling
11 x 18 m
2
Pickling
~150
m
3
Pickling
~90 m
3
New plant pickling
high grade steel:
22 m
3
Chromium plating:
25 m
3
Pickling 9.3 m
3
Edge exhaust No
Exhaust air
pipes
Yes Yes Yes
Exhaust
airflow rate in
m
3
/h
6500 <10000 12000 3000 - 6000 <8500 ~50000 30000 4600 7460 2800 7000
Emission
abatement and
wash medium
Exhaust
scrubbers;
sodium
hydroxide
solution
Exhaust
scrubbers;
sodium
hydroxide
solution
None
Absorption
chamber;
water
Exhaust
scrubbers;
sodium
hydroxide
solution
None
Exhaust
scrubbers
water
No scrubber;
only mist
eliminator/aerosol
separator
No scrubber;
only mist
eliminator/aerosol
separator
Countercurrent
wash tower with 3
plates and a mist
eliminator; pH
value is maintained
at 9.0 with addition
of KOH
Composition
of the pickle
Nitric acid % 20 - 40 <30 12 - <40
Not
known
Not
known
None 15
Hydrofluoric
acid %
<7 <2 4 5 <7
Not
known
0 5 6.5 10
Sulphuric acid
%
1.5 2
Phosphoric
acid %
0.5
Picking
additives
Nitrite
Nitrite,
HF
g CrO
3
/l 250 260
Management
of baths
low temperature,
no air agitation, no
additives
Tenside as
additives
(not PFOS)
Temperature is
about 70 C
Chapter 3
172 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Plant data Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4 Plant 5 Plant 6 Plant 7 Plant 8 Plant 9 Plant 10
Substance in mg/Nm
3
NO
X
4 - 45 <15 21 - 29
15 40
(limit value 200)
<12 <5 7 - 11
HF 0.04 0.06 <0.1 2 5 0.01 0.1 0.05 0.07 0.4 1.6 0.1 0.2
HCl 0.07 0.27 <0.4
H
2
SO
4
<0.6
NaOH 0
NH
3
<0.2
CN
-
0.25 - 0.46
CrVI (ions) <0.1 <0.3
Total chromium 0.001 0.011 (LoD 0.001)
Ni <0.003 <0.1
Note: LoD = limit of detection
Table 3.26: Air emission values for examples of pickling and chromiumplating plants in Germany
[104, UBA, 2003],[Germany, NRW]
Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_Final_Draft Version May 2005 173
Sweden
Table 3.27 shows data from samples taken for regulatory reports for 2003 from five installations. Plants 1 to 4 carry out machining activities, and
plants 5 and 6 have electroplating lines.
Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4 Plant 5 Plant 6
Process
Al
foundry
Foundry Machining Zn II CuSO4 Pickling Zinc Cyanide Nickel
Zinc
rack
Zinc
barrel
Ni/Cr
Nm
3
/h 33100 2100 2400
Emissions in mg/Nm
3
Hydrogen
chloride
0.49 0.63
6.89
9.13
0.49
0.63
0.177
0.184
0.6 1.0
0.04
2.3
<0.3
<0.4
SOx as SO2
0.05 0.96
0.02 to
0.06
0.05
0.96
0.01 to
0.08
0.2 2. 7
1.1
7.0
<0.3
<0.4
NaOH
0.03
0.04
0.2
1.2
<0.01
0.09
Hydrogen
cyanide
<0.01
Cr(VI) and
compounds as
Cr
<0.01
<0.01
Ni and its
compounds as
nickel
0.05 0.08
after filter
<0.04
0.06
<0.3
<0.4
Particulate
matter
1. After
cleaning
<5
2. Other
emission
sources
<10
1.7 1.8
23.1 29. 7
without
cleaning
7.1 8.5
Zinc 0.06 - 0.126
0.06 to
0.126
<0.01 to
<0.01
0.08 to
0.46
Copper
<0.005 to
0.012
Table 3.27: Air emission values for examples of activities for the surface treatment of metals in Sweden
[104, UBA, 2003]
Chapter 3
174 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
3.3.3.1 Conclusions for emissions to air

Overall comments
The ranges of emissions discussed above and from large scale steel coil coating (Table 3.30 and
Table 3.31) are summarised in Table 3.28. The emission ranges are for this sample of surface
treatment plants only; each plant is associated with the data in the sections and tables and a
range of BAT (for example, see Section 4.18). The values should be interpreted taking into
account the comments below, and the guidance of the Monitoring BREF [91, EIPPCB, ]. When
considering a specific installation, the air emissions are only likely to be significant locally. It is
important to take account of the overall load discharged, in addition to the concentration. In
many cases, extraction is for health and safety inside the installation and not to gather fugitive
emissions. Some of the low values reported for some substances result from the low emissions
from processes and/or in-process measures: low values are not always associated with using
end-of-pipe treatments.

The data generally show little variation between sources. This may be because the air emissions
from this sector are not large and are easily dealt with using readily available in-process and/or
end-of-pipe techniques discussed in Section 4.15. Also, air emission measurements are taken
using standardised techniques that may not vary significantly between countries and regulatory
systems (unlike water emission measurements, see Section 3.3.1).

The analysis of the data shows:

some data provided have been provided in a summarised form, and some have not. In
some cases, it is not clear if the data provided is from one sample, a composite or
summarised from several samples
it is not possible to draw overall conclusions about errors and the reliability,
repeatability and accuracy of data, as well as confidence intervals
in some cases, low values may have been included for substances that are not used in
the process or installation being considered. However, they have been submitted as part
of a prescribed group (or suite) of regulatory parameters
each installation has differences which are not fully stated for:
o the potential BAT used, particularly whether air agitation is used
o size and throughput of the process being considered
o chemicals used in the processes and their concentrations
o the substrates being treated
o waste air treatment
few data are given for the:
o type and age of the installations, significant processes or potential BAT used
o percentage of full capacity of the production activity and control techniques at the
time of sampling
o relative contributions where air is extracted through the same sampling point from
more than one production activity
o geographic location and local environmental conditions.

The emission ranges associated with potential BAT derived here reflect the current performance
of some installations in the sector (where data has been provided). However, they are not limit
values (see the Preface and Chapter 5). Some typical emission limits for some European
countries are given in Annex 8.3. The benchmark ranges in Table 3.28 largely fall within the
limit values.

The emission ranges associated with potential BAT are for regulatory samples and the time
intervals are specified in the standard methods used. These are often taken over a period of 30 to
60 minutes during operating time.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 175
Comments on deriving ranges
Due to the uncertainties raised above, particularly that some low values may be due to the
substance not being used, the bottom values of the ranges have been rounded up. The tops of
some ranges have been rounded to appropriate figures, also to take account of uncertainties.

Oxides of nitrogen (total acid forming as NO
2
)
The data sets for NO
X
have widely different values: from Germany <5to 45 mg/Nm
3
to CETS
Netherlands with <500 mg/Nm
3
. One installation reported in Germany has controlled NO
X
from
pickling by substituting a different process chemistry. The range for NO
X
is wide but levels
below 100 mg/l have been achieved in the UK when using scrubbers or adsorption towers, (see
Annex 8.12).

Hydrogen fluoride
A range has been derived from the German pickling plant data.

Hydrogen chloride
Table 3.25 shows that low values may not be associated with waste gas treatment. The range
includes data from CETS Netherlands and CETS UK, Germany and Sweden.

SO
x
as SO
2
A range has been derived from the Swedish data.

NaOH
Data are given for one plant in Sweden. However, no method for determination was given and it
is generally thought that where NaOH needs to be controlled, it is included in the dust limit
value. No range associated with possible BAT has been derived.

Ammonia as N-NH
3
Data are for electroless nickel. No data are included for printed circuit board manufacture,
where ammonia etching is frequently used and may be a significant source of ammonia in the
sector.

Hydrogen cyanide
Low values could be achieved for one process by in-process measures: using a low temperature
solution with pumped agitation (not air). A range has been derived from four sources and
several processes. The lower end of the range is achievable with alkali scrubbers.

Zinc
A range has been derived with the data from Austria and Sweden.

Copper
A range close to the limits of detection has been derived with the data from Austria, CETS
Netherlands and UK and Sweden.

Chromium and its compounds
A range has been derived for hexavalent chromium of <0.1 to 0.2 mg/Nm
3
. Total chromium
figures are all below <0.1 mg/Nm
3
. The figure for total chromium should be greater than that for
hexavalent, however, the figures are close to the limit of detection and this may account for the
abnormality.

Nickel and its compounds
A range close to the limits of detection has been derived from three sources.

Particulate matter
The range is derived from three sources that include wet and dry processes. The range can be
met in some circumstances without cleaning, although to achieve the lower end of the range for
dry particulates cleaning may be necessary. The low end of the range for aqueous processes is
usually achieved after wet or alkali scrubbing for other emissions.

Chapter 3
176 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Emissions
mg/Nm
3
Jig or barrel activities
Large scale
steel coil
activities
Some emission
ranges
Some techniques used to meet local
environmental requirements
associated with the emission ranges
(see Table 3.21)
Source
Austria
Table 3.23
CETS
NL
Table
3.24
CETS
UK
Table
3.25
Germany
Table 3.26
Sweden
Table 3.27
EUROFER
Table 3.30
and Table
3.31
Oxides of nitrogen (total
acid forming as NO
2
)
<500 <5 45
nd
See Note 1 <5 500 Scrubbers or adsorption towers
Hydrogen fluoride <0.1 1.6 <0.1 2 Alkali scrubber
Hydrogen chloride 0.6 4.2 0.3 9.0
tin or
chromium
(ECCS)
process
25 30
<0.3 30
Water scrubber
See Note 2
SO
x
as SO
2
0.1 7.0 nd 1.0 10
Countercurrent packed tower with
alkaline scrubber
NaOH 0.3 - 1.2 nd No range derived
Ammonia as N - NH
3
0.1 9.2 nd 0.1 10
Note: Data is from electroless nickel.
No data is given for PCB
manufacture
Wet scrubber
Hydrogen cyanide 0.11 0.16
LoD
2.7
0.25 0.46 <0.1 nd
1) 0.1 3.0
2) 0.1 0.5
Non-air agitation
Low temperature processes
Non-cyanide processes
The lower end of the range can be
met by using an alkali scrubber
Zinc 0.05 0.07 <0.01 0.46
zinc or zinc
nickel
process
0.17 2.2
<0.01 2.5
Water scrubber
See Note 2
Copper <0.01 0.001
<0.005
0.012
nd <0.01 0.02 See Note 2
Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 177
Emissions
mg/Nm
3
Jig or barrel activities
Large scale
steel coil
activities
Some emission
ranges
Some techniques used to meet local
environmental requirements
associated with the emission ranges
(see Table 3.21)
Source
Austria
Table 3.23
CETS
NL
Table
3.24
CETS
UK
Table
3.25
Germany
Table 3.26
Sweden
Table 3.27
EUROFER
Table 3.30
and Table
3.31
Cr(VI) and compounds
as chromium
Cr(VI)
0.006
0.02
Total
Cr (5
results)
0.0001
Total Cr
<0.01
<0.01
Cr(VI)
<0.01
0.11
<0.01 <0.01 nd
Cr(VI)
<0.01 0.2
Total Cr
<0.1 0.2
See Note 3
Substitution for Cr(VI) by Cr(III) or
non-chromium techniques
Droplet separator
Scrubbers or adsorption tower
Ni and its compounds
as nickel
<0.01 0.01
0.014
0.04
<0.04 0.06 nd <0.01 0.1
Extraction and condense in heat
exchanger
Water or alkali scrubber
Filter
See Note 2
Particulate matter 0.2 0.4 <5 29.7
tin or
chromium
(ECCS)
process
1 20
<5 30
Wet scrubber
Cyclone
Filter
(Values include where there is no
treatment)
Note 1: nd = no data provided
Note 2: in some circumstances, some operators are meeting these ranges without EoP
Note 3: The total Cr <0.1 0.2 is derived from the range of both measurements of Cr(VI) emissions and total Cr emissions
Table 3.28: Summary data for emission ranges to air fromsome installations
Chapter 3
178 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
3.3.4 Noise

Internal noise issues are controlled by occupational health legislation.

External noise is a nuisance factor and depends on nearby targets, such as housing, other
businesses, socially sensitive targets such as hospitals, public access, wildlife etc. Noise is
usually measured as constant levels and peak levels are often compared with local background
levels. Regulation often considers a maximum noise level and level additional to the local norm.
Sometimes noise is also controlled by working hours permitted or giving different noise limits
for different times of day and weekends, e.g. when people living or working locally will be most
affected.

Activities that are especially noisy are identified in Sections 2.13.4 and 4.19. No values have
been given for operating installations.

An example of a regulatory level being given as an addition to the background level is given in
Annex 8.3 [121, France, 2003].

Vibration may also be considered along with noise as a local nuisance issue. It is more difficult
to determine.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 179
3.4 Consumptions and emissions and for other activities

3.4.1 Continuous electrolytic tin coating of steel and continuous
electrolytic chromium coating of steel (ECCS)

The data in this section are based on information supplied from up to seven European lines. The
data should be seen as typical data for this type of process and should not be seen as definitive.

Continuous coating line
Coating metal
Energy
Water
Acid
Miscellaneous
Air emissions
Waste water
Liquid waste
By-product
and waste
Miscellaneous
Natural gas
Electricity
Steam
Tin
Chrome
Electrolyte
Cooling
Rinsing
Scrubbers
Hydrochloric acid
Sulphuric acid
Oil/grease
Corrosion inhibitors
Liquids
HCl
Particulates
Suspended solids
Metals (Fe, Zn, Cr, Sn)
Sulphate
Electrolyte
Spent acid
Scrap
Filter cake
Anodes
Noise
Visual amenity
Entry Cleaning Pickling Plating
Flow melt / chemical Treatment / oiler
Steel
strip
Coated
product
Figure 3.1: Continuous mass stream overview of tin plate and ECCS

Table 3.29 and Table 3.30 represent ranges in consumption and emission levels for the total
coating lines. It should be noted that common site effluent treatment facilities (shared with other
steel processing activities) are often used for these types of processes and hence limited data are
available for final effluent discharges from individual coating lines. Due to the relatively low
impact, only limited data are available for emissions to air.

Chapter 3
180 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Materials
250 300 t/yr
Composition 17 40 g/l Sn
10 - 28 g/l SA
Tin plate electrolyte tin
3 - 5 g/l - ENSA
Chromate sodium dichromate 40 - 50 t/yr
Energy
Natural gas 26 - 40 MJ/t
Electrolyte 360 - 720 MJ/t
Steam 124 - 368 Kg/t
Water total 6.71 - 42.1 m
3
/t
Table 3.29: Typical input and consumption levels for continuous steel coating by electrolytic tin or ECCS

Specific emission Typical range
To the air
HCl
Particulate (dry)
25 - 30 mg/Nm
3
1 - 20 mg/Nm
3
To the water*
Total suspended solids 4 - 40 mg/l
COD 120 - 200 mg/l
Iron 2 - 10 mg/l
Chromium 0.03 - 1 mg/l
Zinc 0.02 - 0.2 mg/l
Tin 0.03 - 1 mg/l
Chromium (VI) 0.0001 - 0.01 mg/l
To waste**
Filter cake from effluent
treatment
8000 - 14000 t/yr
*following waste water treatment and for several different production lines
** wet and depending on production throughput
Table 3.30: Typical emission values for continuous steel coating by electrolytic tin or ECCS

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 181
3.4.2 Continuous electrolytic zinc and zinc-nickel coating of steel

The data in this section are based on information supplied from up to 14 European lines. The
data should be seen as typical data for this type of process and should not be seen as definitive
values.

FCR strip
Continuous Zinc electroplating Line
Degreasing
Zinc coated strip
Pickling
Polishing
Electrolytic
degreasing
Plating
Phosphating Chromate rinse
Energy
Plating metal
Water
Acid
Miscellaneous
Electricity
Natural gas
Zinc-metal/-oxide
nickel carbonate
Cooling
softened
Hydrochloric acid
sulphuric acid
Oil/grease
Alkaline degreasing agents
Phosphate electrolyte
Chromate electrolyte
Liquid
wastes
By-products
Waste water
Air emissions
Miscellaneous
Metals (Ni, Zn, Cr)
Particles, oil mists
Combustion products
Metals (Ni, Zn, Cr)
Suspended solids
Sulphates, chlorates
Metals (Ni, Zn, Cr)
Electrolytes
Oil
Degreasing electrolyte
Noise
Solid waste
Waste water treatment sludge
Figure 3.2: Continuous coating mass stream overview for zinc and zinc-nickel

Table 3.31 represents ranges in consumption and emission levels for the total coating lines. It
should be noted that common site effluent treatment facilities (shared with other steel
processing activities) are often used for these types of processes and hence limited data are
available for final effluent discharges from individual coating lines. Due to the relatively low
impact, only limited data are available for emissions to air.

Chapter 3
182 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Input/consumption level
Energy (GJ/t plated steel)
Electrical
Natural gas/steam

0.4 to 1.5
0.08 to 0.63
Materials (kg/t plated steel)
Zinc
Nickel
Detergent

9.3 to 16.3
0.7 to 1.3
<0.45
Specific emissions
Treated waste water (m
3
/t plated steel)
Released water
0.3 to 4.1
To the air (mg/nm
3
)
Zinc
Nickel

0.17 to 2.2
-
To the water* (mg/l)
Zinc
Nickel
Chromium
COD

0.2 to 2.2
-
-
-
Solid wastes ** (kg/t plated steel)
Oily sludge
Filter cake

0.18

Recycled/Valorised
Metal
Steel scrap
Zinc anodes

Recycled
Recycled (processes with soluble anodes)
Electrolyte
Zinc electrolyte

Recycled (processes with soluble anodes)
* Following waste water treatment and for several different production lines
** Wet and depending on the level of production throughput
Table 3.31 Typical consumption and emission levels for continuous steel coating by zinc and zinc nickel

3.4.3 Printed circuit board manufacturing

3.4.3.1 Water consumption in PCB production

The specific consumption of water per m PCB produced depends on the processes being
applied (for instance, there will be increased consumption when manufacturing multilayer
boards with a higher layer count and HDI boards). Therefore, the consumption can be a range
between 170 and 600 l/m.

3.4.3.2 Raw materials and auxiliary products used and their potential disposal

[122, UBA, 2003] The following table gives a summary of substances used in the individual
production steps, as well as the resulting emissions to air and water, as well as wastes produced.

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 183
Ref Process step Significant substances
In the individual product
In the effluent
of the process
In the
exhaust air
Effluent
resulting
fromair
scrubbing
In the waste
Possible waste
management route
Generation of
phototools
Fixing: emulsions, ammonium
thiosulphate, acidic acid, sodium
sulphite, sodium tetraborate,
aluminium sulphate, sulphuric acid
Developer: potassium sulphite,
potassium phosphate,
hydroquinone, n-butyl diethanol
amine
Fixing: emulsions,
ammonium thiosulphate,
acidic acid, sodium sulphite,
sodium tetra borate,
aluminium sulphate,
sulphuric acid
Developer: potassium
sulphite, potassium
phosphate, hydroquinone, n-
butyl diethanol amine, silver
Acidic acid, sulphites Silver
Good potential for
recycling as silver can be
retrieved
Generation of
sieves for screen
printing, stripping
Emulsions, hypochlorite, iodine
compound, halogen free solvent
Emulsions, hypochlorite,
iodine compound
Hypochlorite,
iodine
compound
Disposal
Treatment of
surfaces
Copper clad laminate, aluminium,
wood
Mechanical processes:
abrasion of brush rollers,
copper
Chemical processes (micro
etch, etch back, desmear):
sodium persulphate,
sulphuric acid, copper,
hydrogen peroxide, sodium
permanganate
SO
2
SO
2
Mechanical processes:
drill dust (consisting of
epoxy resin/glass fibre,
copper, aluminium)
Chemical processes:
copper hydroxide,
potassium sulphate
Mechanical processes:
disposal
Chemical processes:
recycling in waste water
equipment with recycling
of sludge
Brown oxide
process
Hydrogen peroxide, sulphuric acid, copper compounds
SO
2
vapours SO
3
Copper hydroxide
Recycling in waste water
equipment with recycling
of sludge
Mechanical
processing
Copper clad laminate
Dusts (epoxy resin and glass
fibre)
Drilling and routing
dust consisting of
copper, glass fibre and
epoxy resin
Drill back boards made
of aluminium and drill
parts
Hazardous waste disposal
recycling by specialised
companies
Return to manufacturer or
disposal
Chapter 3
184 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Ref Process step Significant substances
In the individual product
In the effluent
of the process
In the
exhaust air
Effluent
resulting
fromair
scrubbing
In the waste
Possible waste
management route
Cut-to-size and processing of
outline
Laminate and PCB
waste
Recycling
Electroplating of PCBs
Plating in
electroless copper
process
Sulphuric acid, sodium persulphate, tin compounds, palladium,
hydrochloric acid, formaldehyde, EDTA/tartrate/Quadrol, sodium
hydroxide, copper compounds
HCl, SO
2
Copper sulphide
Recycling in waste water
equipment with recycling
of sludge
Recovery of palladium
Direct plating Thiophene derivate, sulphuric acid, potassium permanganate SO
2
Generation of
primary image by
screen printing or
photo printing
Dry film, photo sensible screen
printing inks
Polyacrylates, sodium
carbonate
Acrylates
Sludge of solder mask
Protective films
(PE, PES), packing
material, dry film, inks
Treatment of effluents with
disposal of ink sludge
Recycling of plastics and
packing materials
Electroplating of
primary image
Sulphuric acid, sodium persulphate, tin sulphate, copper sulphate,
hydrochloric acid, tetrafluoroboric acid, nitric acid
SO
2,
HCl, NO
X
Copper hydroxide
sludge, tin hydroxide
sludge
Recycling in waste water
equipment with recycling
of sludge
Stripping of photo
resist and screen
printing ink
Sodium hydroxide, polymerised
acrylates
Polyacrylates, sodium
hydroxide
Acrylates
Sludge of solder mask
Recycling in waste water
equipment and disposal of
sludge
Etching
Acidic, etching Hydrochloric acid, copper compounds, hydrogen peroxide
Hydrochloric acid, copper
compounds, hydrogen peroxide
Hydrochloric acid,
copper compounds,
hydrogen peroxide
Recycling of concentrates
Alkaline, etching Ammonium compounds, copper compounds
Ammonium compounds, copper
compounds
Ammonium
compounds, copper
compounds
Recycling
Stripping of metal
resist
Nitric acid, metal compounds (tin) NO
X
Metal compounds,
especially tin hydroxide
Recycling in waste water
equipment with recycling
of sludge
Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 185
Ref Process step Significant substances
In the individual product
In the effluent
of the process
In the
exhaust air
Effluent
resulting
fromair
scrubbing
In the waste
Possible waste
management route
Application of
solder mask
Multifunctional acrylates,
methoxypropylacetate, ketones,
sodium carbonate
Monomeric and polymeric
acrylates, sodium carbonate
Halogen free solvent (MPA) Sludge of solder mask
Recycling in waste water
equipment with recycling
of sludge
Hot air levelling
Tin-lead alloy, hydrogen bromide,
polyethylene glycol Bromide, tin, lead
Polyethylene glycol
(decomposition products)
Polyethylene glycol
(decomposition
products), tin-lead dross
Hazardous waste
incineration
Recycling
Nickel/gold surface
Sodium peroxide sulphate, sulphuric acid, hydrochloric acid,
nickel salt, sodium phosphite, organic acids, gold salt
HCl, SO
2
Nickel, gold, sulphate
Selective ion exchange
with subsequent refining
of gold, precipitation in
waste water equipment
with recycling of sludge
Organic surface
passivation
Acidic acid, imidazole derivate, ammonium compounds CO
2
, NO
X
, NH
4
Acidic acid,
ammonium
Effluent treatment
Table 3.32: Printed circuit boards: summary of types of consumptions and waste outputs
Chapter 3
186 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
3.4.3.3 Waste water from PCB production

As similar techniques to control emission to water are used for PCB production, the discussion
and conclusions in Section 3.3.1 are applicable. Typical regulatory discharge limit values from
PCB production to both public sewer and watercourses are shown in Annex 8.3.

3.4.3.4 Waste from PCB production

Wastes arising from the various process steps are described in the relevant sections in Section
2.11.

Table 3.33 below states the maximum quantities of the most common wastes occurring during
the production of PCBs (per 1000 m
2
surface produced), with their possible management routes,
and indicative Hazardous Waste List (HWL) numbers [100, EC, 2000]. The quantities are
highly dependent on the production programme, types and designs of board produced and the
treatments of wastes and effluents.

PCB wastes arising
Indicative
HWL
Number
Possible waste management routes
Maximum
quantity
(kg/1000 m)
Sludges which may contain
hazardous substances from
physico-chemical treatment
11 01 09 Recycling
2500

Sludges from an in-house water
treatment plant
11 01 09 Disposal 1000
Acidic pickling agents 11 01 05 Recycling 3000
Alkaline pickling agents 11 01 07
Recycling, use in reconditioned
replenisher
2500
Bare PCB (without Au), wastes
originating of outline
processing
16 03 04 Recycling 1500
Bare PCB (with Au) 16 03 04 Recycling 100
Drill back material 12 01 05 Disposal/return 1000
Drilling and routing dust 12 01 05 Disposal 600
Drill entry boards Recycling 800
Solder mask sludge and dry
resist of photo print dept.
08 01 16
08 01 18
Material recycling, thermal disposal 900
Protective films PP/PE 150102 Recycling 400
Precious metals/metals (Ag, Au,
Cu, Ni, Pd, Sn/Pb)
11 01 99
Recycling, significant compensation
by refineries
<100 - 500
Table 3.33: Wastes arising from PCB manufacture

Chapter 3
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 187
3.4.3.5 Air emissions from PCB production

Substances to be expected in the various processes are shown in Table 3.34 below: As similar
techniques to control emissions to air are used for PCB production, the discussion and
conclusions in Section 3.3.3 are applicable

Process Substances
Direct plating
Formaldehyde, manganese, copper and sulphuric acid as
aerosol
Plating
Sulphuric acid, nitric acid, hydrogen fluoride and nitrogen
oxides
Etching and stripper
Ammonia, copper aerosol, hydrogen chloride, and nitrogen
oxides
Hot air levelling equipment C
total
, aldehydes, lead and tin
Immersion tin plating Tin, sulphuric acid, methyl sulphonic acid and thiourea
Plasma treatment to clean drill
holes
Adsorption of radicals by gas scrubbing necessary
Solder masks C
total
and CO
Table 3.34: Air emissions from PCB production

Thermal or catalytic air scrubbing may be required to ensure the C
total
levels meet regulatory
requirements.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 189
4 TECHNIQUES TO CONSIDER IN THE DETERMINATION OF
BAT

This chapter sets out techniques considered generally to have potential for achieving a high
level of environmental protection in the industries within the scope of the document.
Management systems, process-integrated techniques and end-of-pipe measures are included, but
a certain amount of overlap exists between these three when seeking the optimum results.

Prevention, control, minimisation and re-cycling procedures are considered as well as the re-use
of materials and energy

Techniques may be presented singly or as combinations to achieve the objectives of IPPC.
Annex IV to the Directive lists a number of general considerations to be taken into account
when determining BAT and techniques within this chapter will address one or more of these
considerations. As far as possible a standard structure is used to outline each technique, to
enable comparison of techniques and an objective assessment against the definition of BAT
given in the Directive.

The content of this chapter is not an exhaustive list of techniques and others may exist or be
developed which may be equally valid within the framework of BAT.

Generally a standard structure is used to outline each technique, as shown in Table 4.1:

Type of information considered Type of information included
Description Technical description of the technique
Achieved environmental benefits
Main environmental impact(s) to be addressed by the technique
(process or abatement), including emission values achieved and
efficiency performance. Environmental benefits of the technique
in comparison with others
Cross-media effects
Any side-effects and disadvantages caused by implementation of
the technique. Details on the environmental problems of the
technique in comparison with others
Operational data
Performance data on emissions/wastes and consumption (raw
materials, water and energy). Any other useful information on
how to operate, maintain and control the technique, including
safety aspects, operability constraints of the technique, output
quality, etc.
Applicability
Consideration of the factors involved in applying and retrofitting
the technique (e.g. space availability, process specific)
Economics
Information on costs (investment and operation) and any
possible savings (e.g. reduced raw material consumption, waste
charges) also as related to the capacity of the technique
Driving force for implementation
Reasons for implementation of the technique (e.g. other
legislation, improvement in production quality)
Example plants Reference to a plant where the technique is reported to be used
Reference literature Literature for more detailed information on the technique
Table 4.1: Information breakdown for each technique described in this chapter

Key issues for the implementation of IPPC in this sector are:

effective management systems
efficient raw material, energy and water usage
optimised use of chemicals in processes and directly related activities
the substitution by less harmful substances
minimisation, recovery and recycling of waste
the prevention of environmental accidents and minimisation of their consequences.
Chapter 4
190 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Individual sections may address more than one of these issues. Good management systems, both
production and environmental are central to fully addressing integrated pollution prevention and
control issues in the surface treatment of metals and plastics. Important issues for management
systems to achieve optimum effect are:

being constructively self-critical
production and environmental systems implemented as entirely complementary to each
other
inclusion of audits for energy and water usage, as well as raw material consumption
the design and operation of installations to negate the impact of unplanned releases,
both chronic and acute.

4.1 Management techniques

4.1.1 Environmental management tools

Description
The best environmental performance is usually achieved by the installation of the best
technology and its operation in the most effective and efficient manner. This is recognised by
the IPPC Directive definition of techniques as both the technology used and the way in which
the installation is designed, built, maintained, operated and decommissioned.
For IPPC installations an Environmental Management System (EMS) is a tool that operators can
use to address these design, construction, maintenance, operation and decommissioning issues
in a systematic, demonstrable way. An EMS includes the organisational structure,
responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing,
maintaining, reviewing and monitoring the environmental policy. Environmental Management
Systems are most effective and efficient where they form an inherent part of the overall
management and operation of an installation.

Within the European Union, many organisations have decided on a voluntary basis to
implement environmental management systems based on EN ISO 14001:1996 or the EU Eco-
management and audit scheme EMAS. EMAS includes the management system requirements of
EN ISO 14001, but places additional emphasis on legal compliance, environmental performance
and employee involvement; it also requires external verification of the management system and
validation of a public environmental statement (in EN ISO 14001 self-declaration is an
alternative to external verification). There are also many organisations that have decided to put
in place non-standardised EMSs.

While both standardised systems (EN ISO 14001:1996 and EMAS) and non-standardised
(customised) systems in principle take the organisation as the entity, this document takes a
more narrow approach, not including all activities of the organisation e.g. with regard to their
products and services, due to the fact that the regulated entity under the IPPC Directive is the
installation (as defined in Article 2).

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 191
An environmental management system (EMS) for an IPPC installation can contain the
following components:

(a) definition of an environmental policy
(b) planning and establishing objectives and targets
(c) implementation and operation of procedures
(d) checking and corrective action
(e) management review
(f) preparation of a regular environmental statement
(g) validation by certification body or external EMS verifier
(h) design considerations for end-of-life plant decommissioning
(i) development of cleaner technologies
(j) benchmarking.

These features are explained in somewhat greater detail below. For detailed information on
components (a) to (g), which are all included in EMAS, the reader is referred to the reference
literature indicated below.

(a) Definition of an environmental policy

Top management are responsible for defining an environmental policy for an installation
and ensuring that it:

is appropriate to the nature, scale and environmental impacts of the activities
includes a commitment to pollution prevention and control
includes a commitment to comply with all relevant applicable environmental legislation
and regulations, and with other requirements to which the organisation subscribes
provides the framework for setting and reviewing environmental objectives and targets
is documented and communicated to all employees
is available to the public and all interested parties.

(b) Planning, i.e.:

procedures to identify the environmental aspects of the installation, in order to
determine those activities which have or can have significant impacts on the
environment, and to keep this information up-to-date
procedures to identify and have access to legal and other requirements to which the
organisation subscribes and that are applicable to the environmental aspects of its
activities
establishing and reviewing documented environmental objectives and targets, taking
into consideration the legal and other requirements and the views of interested parties
establishing and regularly updating an environmental management programme,
including designation of responsibility for achieving objectives and targets at each
relevant function and level as well as the means and timeframe by which they are to be
achieved.

(c) Implementation and operation of procedures

It is important to have systems in place to ensure that procedures are known, understood and
complied with, therefore effective environmental management includes:

(i) Structure and responsibility
defining, documenting and communicating roles, responsibilities and authorities,
which includes appointing one specific management representative
providing resources essential to the implementation and control of the environmental
management system, including human resources and specialised skills, technology
and financial resources.
Chapter 4
192 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
(ii) Training, awareness and competence

identifying training needs to ensure that all personnel whose work may significantly
affect the environmental impacts of the activity have received appropriate training.

(iii) Communication
establishing and maintaining procedures for internal communication between the
various levels and functions of the installation, as well as procedures that foster a
dialogue with external interested parties and procedures for receiving, documenting
and, where reasonable, responding to relevant communication from external
interested parties.

(iv) Employee involvement
involving employees in the process aimed at achieving a high level of environmental
performance by applying appropriate forms of participation such as the suggestion-
book system or project-based group works or environmental committees.

(v) Documentation
establishing and maintaining up-to-date information, in paper or electronic form, to
describe the core elements of the management system and their interaction and to
provide direction to related documentation.

(vi) Efficient process control
adequate control of processes under all modes of operation, i.e. preparation, start-up,
routine operation, shutdown and abnormal conditions
identifying the key performance indicators and methods for measuring and
controlling these parameters (e.g. flow, pressure, temperature, composition and
quantity)
documenting and analysing abnormal operating conditions to identify the root causes
and then addressing these to ensure that events do not recur (this can be facilitated
by a no-blame culture where the identification of causes is more important than
apportioning blame to individuals).

(vii) Maintenance programme
establishing a structured programme for maintenance based on technical descriptions
of the equipment, norms etc. as well as any equipment failures and consequences
supporting the maintenance programme by appropriate record keeping systems and
diagnostic testing
clearly allocating responsibility for the planning and execution of maintenance.

(viii) Emergency preparedness and response
establishing and maintaining procedures to identify the potential for and response to
accidents and emergency situations, and for preventing and mitigating the
environmental impacts that may be associated with them.

(d) Checking and corrective action, i.e.:

(i) Monitoring and measurement
establishing and maintaining documented procedures to monitor and measure, on a
regular basis, the key characteristics of operations and activities that can have a
significant impact on the environment, including the recording of information for
tracking performance, relevant operational controls and conformance with the
installation's environmental objectives and targets (see also the Reference document
on Monitoring of Emissions)
establishing and maintaining a documented procedure for periodically evaluating
compliance with relevant environmental legislation and regulations.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 193
(ii) Corrective and preventive action
establishing and maintaining procedures for defining responsibility and authority for
handling and investigating non-conformance with permit conditions, other legal
requirements as well as objectives and targets, taking action to mitigate any impacts
caused and for initiating and completing corrective and preventive action that are
appropriate to the magnitude of the problem and commensurate with the
environmental impact encountered.

(iii) Records
establishing and maintaining procedures for the identification, maintenance and
disposition of legible, identifiable and traceable environmental records, including
training records and the results of audits and reviews.

(iv) Audit
establishing and maintaining (a) programme(s) and procedures for periodic
environmental management system audits that include discussions with personnel,
inspection of operating conditions and equipment and reviewing of records and
documentation and that results in a written report, to be carried out impartially and
objectively by employees (internal audits) or external parties (external audits),
covering the audit scope, frequency and methodologies, as well as the
responsibilities and requirements for conducting audits and reporting results, in order
to determine whether or not the environmental management system conforms to
planned arrangements and has been properly implemented and maintained
completing the audit or audit cycle, as appropriate, at intervals of no longer than
three years, depending on the nature, scale and complexity of the activities, the
significance of associated environmental impacts, the importance and urgency of the
problems detected by previous audits and the history of environmental problems
more complex activities with a more significant environmental impact are audited
more frequently
having appropriate mechanisms in place to ensure that the audit results are followed
up.

(v) Periodic evaluation of legal compliance
reviewing compliance with the applicable environmental legislation and the
conditions of the environmental permit(s) held by the installation
documentation of the evaluation.

(e) Management review, i.e.:

reviewing, by top management, at intervals that it determines, the environmental
management system, to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness
ensuring that the necessary information is collected to allow management to carry out this
evaluation
documentation of the review.

(f) Preparation of a regular environmental statement:

- preparing an environmental statement that pays particular attention to the results
achieved by the installation against its environmental objectives and targets. It is
regularly produced from once a year to less frequently depending on the significance
of emissions, waste generation etc. It considers the information needs of relevant
interested parties and it is publicly available (e.g. in electronic publications, libraries
etc.).

Chapter 4
194 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
When producing a statement, the operator may use relevant existing environmental performance
indicators, making sure that the indicators chosen:

i. give an accurate appraisal of the installations performance
ii. are understandable and unambiguous
iii. allow for year on year comparison to assess the development of the
environmental performance of the installation
iv. allow for comparison with sector, national or regional benchmarks as
appropriate
v. allow for comparison with regulatory requirements as appropriate.

(g) Validation by certification body or external EMS verifier:

- having the management system, audit procedure and environmental statement examined
and validated by an accredited certification body or an external EMS verifier can, if
carried out properly, enhance the credibility of the system.

(h) Design considerations for end-of-life plant decommissioning

- giving consideration to the environmental impact from the eventual decommissioning of
the unit at the stage of designing a new plant, as forethought makes decommissioning
easier, cleaner and cheaper
- decommissioning poses environmental risks for the contamination of land (and
groundwater) and generates large quantities of solid waste. Preventive techniques are
process-specific but general considerations may include:

i. avoiding underground structures
ii. incorporating features that facilitate dismantling
iii. choosing surface finishes that are easily decontaminated
iv. using an equipment configuration that minimises trapped chemicals and
facilitates drain-down or washing
v. designing flexible, self-contained units that enable phased closure
vi. using biodegradable and recyclable materials where possible.

(i) Development of cleaner technologies:

- environmental protection should be an inherent feature of any process design activities
carried out by the operator, since techniques incorporated at the earliest possible design
stage are both more effective and cheaper. Giving consideration to the development of
cleaner technologies can for instance occur through R&D activities or studies. As an
alternative to internal activities, arrangements can be made to keep abreast with and
where appropriate commission work by other operators or research institutes active in
the relevant field.

(j) Benchmarking, i.e.:

carrying out systematic and regular comparisons with sector, national or regional
benchmarks, including for energy efficiency and energy conservation activities, choice
of input materials, emissions to air and discharges to water (using for example the
European Pollutant Emission Register, EPER), consumption of water and generation of
waste.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 195
Standardised and non-standardised EMSs
An EMS can take the form of a standardised or non-standardised (customised) system.
Implementation and adherence to an internationally accepted standardised system such as
EN ISO 14001:1996 can give higher credibility to the EMS, especially when subject to a
properly performed external verification. EMAS provides additional credibility due to the
interaction with the public through the environmental statement and the mechanism to ensure
compliance with the applicable environmental legislation. However, non-standardised systems
can in principle be equally effective provided that they are properly designed and implemented.

Achieved environmental benefits
Implementation of and adherence to an EMS focuses the attention of the operator on the
environmental performance of the installation. In particular, the maintenance of and compliance
with clear operating procedures for both normal and abnormal situations and the associated lines
of responsibility should ensure that the installations permit conditions and other environmental
targets and objectives are met at all times.

Environmental management systems typically ensure the continuous improvement of the
environmental performance of the installation. The poorer the starting point is, the more
significant short-term improvements can be expected. If the installation already has a good
overall environmental performance, the system helps the operator to maintain the high
performance level.

Cross-media effects
Environmental management techniques are designed to address the overall environmental
impact, which is consistent with the integrated approach of the IPPC Directive.

Operational data
No specific information reported.

Applicability
The components described above can typically be applied to all IPPC installations. The scope
(e.g. level of detail) and nature of the EMS (e.g. standardised or non-standardised) will
generally be related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of
environmental impacts it may have.

Economics
It is difficult to accurately determine the costs and economic benefits of introducing and
maintaining a good EMS. A number of studies are presented below. However, these are just
examples and their results are not entirely coherent. They might not be representative for all
sectors across the EU and should thus be treated with caution.

A Swedish study carried out in 1999 surveyed all 360 ISO-certified and EMAS-registered
companies in Sweden. With a response rate of 50 %, it concluded among other things that:

- the expenses for introducing and operating EMS are high but not unreasonably so, save in
the case of very small companies. Expenses are expected to decrease in the future
- a higher degree of co-ordination and integration of EMS with other management systems is
seen as a possible way to decrease costs
- half of all the environmental objectives and targets give payback within one year through
cost savings and/or increased revenue
- the largest cost savings were made through decreased expenditure on energy, waste
treatment and raw materials
- most of the companies think that their position on the market has been strengthened through
the EMS. One-third of the companies report increasing revenue due to EMS.
In some Member States reduced supervision fees are charged if the installation has a
certification.

Chapter 4
196 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
A number of studies
5
show that there is an inverse relationship between company size and the
cost of implementing an EMS. A similar inverse relationship exists for the payback period of
invested capital. Both elements imply a less favourable cost-benefit relationship for
implementing an EMS in SMEs compared to larger companies.

According to a Swiss study, the average cost for building and operating ISO 14001 can vary:

- for a company with between 1 and 49 employees: CHF 64000 (EUR 44000) for building the
EMS and CHF 16000 (EUR 11000) per year for operating it
- for an industrial site with more than 250 employees: CHF 367000 (EUR 252000) for
building the EMS and CHF 155000 (EUR 106000) per year for operating it.

These average figures do not necessarily represent the actual cost for a given industrial site
because this cost is also highly dependent on the number of significant items (pollutants, energy
consumption,...) and on the complexity of the problems to be studied.

A recent German study (Schaltegger, Stefan and Wagner, Marcus, Umweltmanagement in
deutschen Unternehmen - der aktuelle Stand der Praxis, February 2002, p. 106) shows the
following costs for EMAS for different branches. It can be noted that these figures are much
lower than those of the Swiss study quoted above. This is a confirmation of the difficulty to
determine the costs of an EMS.

Costs for building (EUR):
minimum - 18750
maximum - 75000
average - 50000

Costs for validation (EUR):
minimum - 5000
maximum - 12500
average - 6000
A study by the German Institute of Entrepreneurs (Unternehmerinstitut/Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Selbstndiger Unternehmer UNI/ASU, 1997, Umweltmanagementbefragung - ko-Audit in der
mittelstndischen Praxis - Evaluierung und Anstze fr eine Effizienzsteigerung von
Umweltmanagementsystemen in der Praxis, Bonn.) gives information about the average savings
achieved for EMAS per year and the average payback time. For example, for implementation
costs of EUR 80000 they found average savings of EUR 50000 per year, corresponding to a
payback time of about one and a half years.

External costs relating to verification of the system can be estimated from guidance issued by
the International Accreditation Forum (http://www.iaf.nu).

5
E.g. Dyllick and Hamschmidt (2000, 73) quoted in Klemisch H. and R. Holger, Umweltmanagementsysteme in kleinen und
mittleren Unternehmen Befunde bisheriger Umsetzung, KNI Papers 01/02, January 2002, p 15; Clausen J., M. Keil and M.
Jungwirth, The State of EMAS in the EU.Eco-Management as a Tool for Sustainable Development Literature Study, Institute
for Ecological Economy Research (Berlin) and Ecologic Institute for International and European Environmental Policy
(Berlin), 2002, p 15.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 197
Driving forces for implementation
Environmental management systems can provide a number of advantages, for example:

improved insight into the environmental aspects of the company
improved basis for decision-making
improved motivation of personnel
additional opportunities for operational cost reduction and product quality improvement
improved environmental performance
improved company image
reduced liability, insurance and non-compliance costs
increased attractiveness for employees, customers and investors
increased trust of regulators, which could lead to reduced regulatory oversight
improved relationship with environmental groups.

Example plants
The features described under (a) to (e) above are elements of EN ISO 14001:1996 and the
European Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), whereas the features (f)
and (g) are specific to EMAS. These two standardised systems are applied in a number of IPPC
installations

Examples from site visits are:

CROPU S.A., Burgos Spain: ISO 14000
SIKEL N.V, Genk, Belgium: ISO 14001
Socit de Galvanoplastie Industrielle (SGI), Plaisir, France
Exhall Plating, Ltd., Coventry, UK: EMAS and ISO 14001. Direct costs reduced by
GBP 500000 in seven years.

In this sector, the application of an EMS (and whether the EMS is a standardised one) is often a
customer-requirement.

Reference literature
(Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European parliament and of the council allowing
voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme
(EMAS), OJ L 114, 24/4/2001, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/emas/index_en.htm).

(EN ISO 14001:1996, http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/iso9000-14000/iso14000/iso14000index.html;
http://www.tc207.org)
Chapter 4
198 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.1.1.1 Specific EMS issues for surface treatment activities

Specific EMS issues that may be relevant are:

installing valves and numbering them for all pipes. The numbers are then used in
instructions for shutdown sequences, both long and short-term shutdown
checking all tanks and pipework regularly for leakage. This requires tank bottoms and
pipes to be visible, with no accrual of dirt, rubbish, old jigs, anode ends, etc. in
contained areas and around tanks or pipes
using fixed and temporary pumps, hydraulic fluid systems and filters over mobile tanks
or drip trays with sufficient capacity to retain leakage and spills. Pipe ends are kept over
the process tank or drip trays. This enables liquid residues to be collected and returned
to the correct process solutions or dealt with as a waste or waste water
keeping all process areas clean and painted to allow chronic leakage to be readily
identified
the use of high level alarms in both process vats and waste water treatment where over
flow is possible [125, Ireland, 2003]
the management of the chemicals and proprietary products for their correct use, and
especially the identification of risks associated with the storage and use of incompatible
materials [125, Ireland, 2003]
the identification of the use of priority pollutants in the installation (used currently and
in the past). This may also be required for compliance with legislation controlling
priority pollutants, see Annex 8.1 in the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EG)
[113, Austria, 2003]. Priority pollutants are also identified by PARCOM [12,
PARCOM, 1992]. Key examples for this sector are:
o polychlorinated biphenyls, e.g. in capacitors and other electrical equipment
o cadmium
o other materials that do not or are slow to degrade, such as other metals in soluble
form (such as nickel, chromium, zinc, copper, lead)
o VOCs used for degreasing (including C10 - C13 chloralkanes)
o cyanides
o acids and alkalis
the establishment of the use of the land and buildings of the installation prior to the
existing installation and/or activities and if the activities carried out could be confused
with the activities of the surface treatment installation
the self - monitoring of indicators for environmental performance as well as those
affecting individual processes. Examples are:
o effluent discharged and quality, see Annex 8.4.2 [56, France, 2003, 121, France,
2003]
o raw material consumption by type
o energy consumption
o water consumption
o waste produced and type.

These figures are most meaningful when related to other relevant production parameters, such
as area of workpiece or substrate throughput, number of barrels or flight bars processed, weight
of workpieces or substrate processed, etc.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 199
4.1.2 Reduction in reworking by process specification and quality control

Description
Workpieces or substrate surface treated incorrectly, to the wrong or inappropriate specification,
or a specification incorrectly applied can lead to significant amounts of metal stripping and
rectification (in barrel and jig work) as described in Section 2.3, metal stripping. Workpieces
and/or substrate may also have to be scrapped, predominantly large scale coils and printed
circuit boards, although some jig and barrel processed workpieces may be damaged
irrecoverably.

Reduction in reworking and scrap can be achieved in a variety of ways, such as using formal
quality management systems, QMS. As with environmental management tools, described in
Section 4.1.1, to achieve success within the installation, it is good practice to ensure these
systems are formally recorded and disseminated to the workforce. While many such systems are
externally accredited (and this may be a customer requirement) it may not be essential.
However, it is usual to have the system externally audited, to provide unbiased input to validate
and update the system, as well as giving customer confidence. These systems usually include
statistical process control (SPC).

Attention to the appropriate process specification and its quality control is also an important
factor. In surface treatment activities a right first time approach is normally anticipated and is
often part of a formal system. To achieve this, it is common practice to ensure the correct
process is applied in the correct manner to achieve the desired effect. This requires a proper
understanding of the properties given by the surface treatment and the subsequent operations to
be performed on the workpiece or substrate such as pressing, forming, bending, crimping,
drilling, welding, soldering, etc. Other techniques that form part of achieving the correct
specification are discussed in EMS (Section 4.1.1) and in production management systems, such
as ISO 9000

To match the treatment to the required objective, environmental and/or quality management
systems (as appropriate) can make sufficient provision for dialogue and agreement between the
operator and the customer about the correct process specification, engineering design drawings
and the quality control measurement points for the workpieces and/or substrates (see
Applicability, below). The following are examples of areas that can be addressed:

surface treatments can alter the dimensions of a workpiece by the thickness of layer
added (e.g. changing the size of threaded components), the characteristics of the
substrate (e.g. hydrogen embrittlement with acid zinc plating) or be inappropriate for
subsequent manipulation (e.g. some finishes may be brittle and may flake when a
treated workpiece is subsequently bent or crimped)
in electrolytic processes where the applied material is current-carrying, the deposits
build preferentially at edges and corners of the workpiece and/or substrate, where the
charge density is greatest. The method of measurement and the points to be measured
for quality control of the finish may be agreed taking account of the differences of
thickness at different parts of the workpiece or substrate to be finished. Some
measurement methods require flat surfaces and to meet performance requirements
attention may need to be given the coating thickness being significantly thinner in flat
areas than at the edges (a ratio of centre thickness to edge thickness of approximately
1:3 or 1:4). Also, while specifications may be met in the flat, measured areas, edge
build-up can result in flaking if the edges are subsequently manipulated, such as by
crimping
performance specifications (such as to achieve a specified level of corrosion resistance)
are preferable to total reliance on prescriptive specifications. The more usual and
readily applied thickness measurements are best used in conjunction with performance
specifications, when thicknesses at agreed points that meet the specified performance
can be established (see also the discussion on Substitution, Section 4.9)
Chapter 4
200 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
alterations to the manufacturing process prior to surface treatment. For example, change
in pressing oils (to a type which may become pressed into the substrate micro-structure
and does not respond to normal degreasing processes), type of substrate, pressing
workpieces in place of machining, hardening prior to surface treatment, etc.
alterations to end use specification
barrel treatment instead of jig (possibly because of cost constraints)
major organisations or industry sectors requiring large amounts of surface treatment
may write their own specifications (such as automotive or aerospace organisations).
Smaller organisations often use these publicly available specifications. To meet
specifications, take care to ensure the latest versions are referred to, and the
specifications are suitable for other products, their subsequent processing and end use
some customers may request the highest quality specifications available, such as
military and aerospace specifications involving cadmium for other products. However,
military and aerospace applications are exempt from marketing and use legislation
applying to cadmium.

There are many ways in which processes can be improved for stability and consistency over
time and many techniques described in Chapter 4 have this advantage as well as improving
environmental performance. Where this occurs, it is highlighted in the section Driving force for
implementation. Examples are the use of insoluble anodes with external make-up (see Section
4.8.2), process solution agitation (Section 4.3.4) and control of concentration of process
chemicals (Section 4.8.1).

Achieved environmental benefits
Avoiding reworking minimises losses in raw material, energy and water inputs, as well as
minimising waste water treatment and the generation of sludge and liquid acid wastes.

Metal stripping with strong acids is often carried out as a batch process. Reduction in this
activity can result in reductions in:

spillage which can attack concrete floors and can pollute surface and groundwaters
exceeding waste water treatment plant capacity leading to breach of permit discharge
conditions
acid fumes and mists leading to problems with local air quality, health and safety and
deterioration of plant and equipment.

Reduction in surface treated scrap can reduce emissions to air from other installations such as
furnaces and foundries. In these, some non-ferrous metals may be vaporised and organic
coatings burnt off with unknown breakdown products.

Cross-media effects
There are no negative cross-media effects.

Operational data
If specification or processing is incorrect, a significant proportion of production capacity may be
affected.

In some cases, workpieces and/or substrates are damaged in the reworking, or cannot be
reworked and are scrapped.

Applicability
Applicable to all installations. However, note that the IPPC Directive applies to the installation
and its management systems. It does not apply to the supply chain and products.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 201
Economics
There is significant economic justification for ensuring the specification is correct and is met,
thus preventing reworking. Avoiding reworking is a positive action towards sustainable
manufacturing and increases process throughput efficiency, as well as increasing customer
confidence. There are cost savings in raw materials, hazardous waste disposal, energy and
water, as well as labour. For sub-contract installations, the cost of stripping and reworking is
usually borne by the sub-contractor.

Conversely, there are costs associated with introducing and maintaining process management
systems and SPC.

Driving force for implementation
Business economics and sustainability.
Customer requirements for quality management systems.

Example plants
All sites visited have quality management systems; some accredited, but all externally assessed.
Examples are: SIKEL N.V., Genk, Belgium; Exhall Plating, Coventry, UK; SGI, Plaisir,
France; Corus, Llanelli, UK; Cropu SA, Burgos, Spain.

Reference literature
[11, Tempany, 2002, 18, Tempany, 2002]

4.1.3 Benchmarking

Description
Benchmarking is the systematic recording of inputs (raw materials, energy and water) and
outputs (emissions to air, water and as waste), and the regular comparisons of these with
previous data for the installation, with its sector, national or regional benchmarks see Section
4.1.1(j). Appropriate benchmarking requires comparable data a like for like comparison. For
surface treatment activities this would be best achieved on a surface area treated basis or other
consumption or throughout basis. For instance, kg of zinc used per 10000 m
2
of surface, kg zinc
discharged per 10000 m
2
of surface, kWh per 10000 m
2
of surface.

The surface area for stamped or pressed parts, or parts fabricated from the same thickness of
substrate can be calculated [145, LeCarre, 2004] as follows:

Where: S = surface area , e = thickness and m = metres

The Solvent Emissions Directive [97, EC, 1999] gives a formula for calculating the surface area
for the vehicle coating industry and other coated parts made from sheets (note the factor 2x for
coating both sides):

Chapter 4
202 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Variables can make such data difficult to acquire accurately: for instance, workpieces have
irregular shapes and varying thicknesses so estimations of surface area can vary in accuracy,
and thickness of deposited coatings can vary widely [124, Germany, 2003]. However, these
difficulties do not prevent the gathering of data to be used as Section 4.1.1(j) describes (see
Table 3.5). Designs produced electronically by CAD can also a be a source of deriving areas.

When data is benchmarked in an installation, it is good practice to maintain a system to action
the data, including:

identifying a person or persons responsible for evaluating and taking action on the data
informing those responsible for plant performance, including alerting operators, rapidly
and effectively to variations from normal performance
other investigations to ascertain why performance has varied or is out of line with
external benchmarks.

Examples of benchmarking methods and applications are given below. Where sector, national or
regional data is gathered, it can be made public while keeping individual site identities
confidential:

Installation
One company electroplating or phosphating complex-shaped parts uses five barrel lines, all with
barrels of the same size. Water inputs are metered at every input point. Barrel movements are
recorded per flight bar. All data, such as raw material consumption, water and power
consumption etc are then related to flight bar movements, and tracked and compared on a
regular basis to monitor plant performance and costs.

Sector
In the UK, the Surface Engineering Association conducts a national survey of members to
benchmark costs, etc.

Regional
Data envelope analysis (DEA) is a method of analysis that has been developed to compare the
efficiency of organisational units when it is difficult to make the inputs or outputs comparable
with unambiguous quantities. It can be applied in situations in which there are observations
from many relatively homogeneous production units. In this context, homogeneity refers to the
inputs and outputs that the units produce. They do not need to be organised in the same way or
use the same types of production technology.

An example of DEA applied to surface treatment is given in Data variables from a survey of 15
electroplating companies were analysed in four groups:

quantity of workpiece/substrate outputs
labour and capital invested in equipment
energy and water consumption
emissions.

The DEA results were calculated using a varying combination of input factors. The efficiency
score (productive efficiency) was calculated for inputs in capital and man-hours, water and
energy with various outputs to the environment. The only output quantifier was the annual
revenue earned by treatment. The data was modelled using linear programming methods with
weighting factors.

Examples are also given for steel coil coating in Section 3.3.4

Achieved environmental benefits
Assists individual installations to assess their environmental performance with other
installations. Assists in identifying techniques used by the best performing installations.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 203
Cross-media effects
None.

Operational data
Provides benchmarks and assessment of operational environmental performance for installations
and techniques.

Applicability
Data must be available for several installations with homogeneity of inputs and outputs before
an individual installation can be benchmarked. The breadth of data and installations needs to be
sufficiently wide to be challenging; for example, [8, Nordic-Council, 2002] benchmarks water
usage at 50 litres per m
2
. The UK industry median is about 44 litres per m
2
(verbal information
from TWG) and the French regulatory maximum is 8 litres per m
2
per rinsing operation which
equates to 40 litres per m
2
for a 5-process line (see Section 3.2.2) [58, France, 2003].

Weighting factors need to be determined. Knowledge of DEA and its application with linear
programming is required. This approach may be useful for a group of companies or a trade
association. The technique does not readily take account of cross-media effects.

Economics
DEA may need expert assistance for application.

Optimisation of the plant environmental performance will usually achieve economic
optimisation.

Driving force for implementation
Benchmarking is also commensurate with good economic performance. Benchmarking and
optimising environmental performance (such as raw material, water and power inputs, as well as
material losses) will achieve economic optimisation at the same time.

Example plants
Unnamed examples are given by, [8, Nordic-Council, 2002] Oekepol and Eurofer.
Regional/sector schemes: Ford-BOS (e.g. Frost Electroplating Ltd., Birmingham, UK)
Installations: Exhall Plating Ltd., Coventry, UK e.g. m
3
per barrel line per shift,
Metal Colours Ltd., Slough, UK: e.g. kWh/kg Zn
SIKEL N.V., Genk, Belgium: e.g. efficiency of zinc utilisation (>95 %).

Reference literature
Installation and national sector: [18, Tempany, 2002], [127, Oekopol, 2003],
Regional: [8, Nordic-Council, 2002], [19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.1.3.1 Benchmarking water consumption

Description
In France, a benchmark value for water usage of 8 l/m
2
/rinse stage was introduced in 1985 in
legislation applying to all surface treatment installations with a total volume of treatment tanks
of more than 10m
3
.
Achieved environmental benefits
This benchmark reduces the water usage and the waste water treatment requirements, prevents
dilution of effluents and reduces the flux (weight per day) of materials lost.

Cross-media effects
These depend on the water-reduction techniques used.

Chapter 4
204 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Operational data
Once determined, it need only be checked periodically. It is not a routine limit value, and that
some key measures to achieve this value, such as number of rinses in a cascade, can only be
changed periodically, see Section 4.7. Other measures can be used to control variables, such as
conductivity meters on rinse tanks as well as flow-meters and restrictor valves on each point of
water use: these are important factors in achieving the range, and maintaining the values, see
Section 4.4.5.

Only the volume of water leaving the plant is measured, therefore avoiding problems with
calculating evaporation, added liquid solutions, how much water is recycled, etc. This discharge
figure accounts for all water used, except for domestic-type usage (toilets, canteens, etc.).

The values for individual rinsing stages (or the component steps) are not calculated, only the
total volume against the total number of rinse stages for the installation. This allows for some
rinsing stages to use more water than others, according to operational needs.

There is difficulty in calculating the surface area, see Section 4.1.3, but in 80 90 % of cases
the operator knows this for commercial reasons, or can determine this. In some cases, operators
can determine and use a surrogate measure; for example, by running the process for a set period
using the most geometrically simple components and measuring the water discharged, at the
same time measuring another consumption or throughput factor (e.g. power usage, number of
jigs or barrels, number or weight of parts, chemicals or anode consumption, etc). The amount of
water discharged is then related to this secondary throughput or consumption factor. This
secondary factor can subsequently be used to re-check the benchmark value against more
geometrically intricate components.

The surface area is the simple geometric wetted surface. It includes all surfaces of the supports
moving through the rinses, i.e. barrels (inside and outside surfaces) and jigs.

A stage is all the tanks in one rinsing operation after a process or associated activity. It may be
one or multiple tanks, and multiple tanks used in cascade rinsing significantly reduce water
usage (as described in Section 4.7), see Figure 4.1.

Figure 4.1: Definition of rinse stage

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 205
Applicability
This has been successfully used in 80 % of French installations since 1985. Water usage may be
higher in very high specification activities such as PCB production (see Section 3.4.3.1).

Economics
This benchmark can reduce investment costs (particularly for raw water and waste water
treatment) and running costs (particularly for raw materials and water).

Driving force for implementation
Reducing water flow through the process is crucial, not only for water saving, but can be used
with drag-out controls to reduce raw material usage and increase materials efficiency. This also
reduces the size of waste water treatment plant needed and the treatment chemicals and energy
used in treatment.

Example plants
80 % of French surface treatment installations.

Reference literature
[58, France, 2003], [121, France, 2003], [165, Tempany, 2004]

4.1.4 Process line optimisation

Description
Calculating the theoretical inputs and outputs required for selected options, such as those given
in Sections 4.4.2, 4.4.4.2, 4.6 and 4.7 is useful to benchmark the installations environmental
and economical performance. While this can be carried out manually, it is tedious and time
consuming. Software modelling tools can be used to help optimise performance of process lines
by making recalculations easier and quicker. They can be written for processes by external
contractors or in-house, and may be general or bespoke for a specific installation.
One software tool is based on an Excel spreadsheet and has a series of parameters for rack and
barrel zinc electroplating. The calculations used in the spreadsheet are the same as, or similar to,
the ones quoted in this BREF, and other similar information, including standard financial
calculations. An example calculation is given in Annex 8.11. One data set is held for a good
practice plant (the SE2000 model plant) and the other set initially to a UK industry average
plant called the benchmark(this is not benchmark as used in this BREF, but means the current
level of practice).The example given shows the costs of changing from an industry average to a
good practice plant using several improvement options described in Chapter 4 of this BREF.

As an example, using the software shown in Annex 8.11 the difference in a typical zinc and
passivation barrel line and one optimised using various BAT techniquesis:

Typical line: 11500 m
3
water usage per year
Optimised line: 2951 m
3
water usage per year, a saving of 74 %

The input data for the industry average(benchmark) plant can be adjusted to an actual plant for
benchmarking, or used to examine the effects of various options, such as adding rinsing stages,
evaporators, or changing processes, etc.

While the software is set for zinc plating, all the variables, such as chemical make-up type, and
all input and output costs can be varied, so the software can be used for other processes, either
complete lines such as for copper plating, or to judge the effects of changing one activity.

Achieved environmental benefits
Enables a process line to be optimised theoretically for consumption of water, energy and
conservation of raw materials, as well as minimising emissions to water.
Chapter 4
206 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Cross-media effects
Enables optimisation of inputs (raw materials and utilities) and emissions to water at the same
time.

Operational data
Can use existing data and can be used to benchmark performance as well as plan improvements.

Applicability
For this example, the front-end(visible page in the software) shows zinc electroplating, but the
same calculations can readily be adapted by the user to other surface treatment activities, by
entering simple, appropriate data in the model. It can therefore be used for all multistage process
lines, or individual sub-processes.

While financial data is shown in GBP this is purely symbolic, all financial data can be entered
as if in other currencies for calculation.

The programme does not optimise the whole installation.

Other manual or software packages can be used or built, sometimes for a specific plant, see
example, below.

Economics
The software referred to is free of charge.
Trialling options using software can assist with process management and investment decisions
before commitment.
As an example, Annex 8.11 shows a payback time for optimising a zinc and passivation barrel
line, (without infrastructure work) = 0.6 years, based on savings in water, raw materials and
reject reworking.

Driving force for implementation
Environmental optimisation can optimise the plants process and economic performance.

Example plants
A general example is shown in Annex 8.11 of a non-optimised installation and an installation
using various potential BAT techniques agreed with British industry is used as a comparison in
the software.

For optimisation by bespoke software, Sikel N.V. Genk, Belgium

Reference literature
[26, Envirowise, 2003]

4.1.5 Real time process control

Description
Digital process control systems collect data and react to maintain predetermined process values
in real time.

Achieved environmental benefits
Improved plant efficiency and product quality as well as lowering the emissions.

Cross-media effects
None.

Applicability
Many continuous electroplating lines
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 207
Economics
For coil coating, the initial investment is EUR>0.8/t installed with operating and maintenance
costs of EUR>0.8/t installed.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency and quality requirements.

Example plants
CROPU S.A., Burgos, Spain, SIKEL N.V., Genk, Belgium.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003, 73, BSTSA, ]

4.2 Installation design, construction and operation

4.2.1 Pollution prevention from unplanned releases planning, design,
construction and other systems

Description
Section 1.4.2 identifies the sector as still having the potential to cause environmental accidents,
or unplanned releases. A planned, integrated approach can decrease this, starting with the
identification of those aspects of an installation that may have significant impacts on the
environment. The identified risks are then tackled by careful design and construction, as well as
by management systems that address the prevention, mitigation and management of accidents
and emergencies, and the breaches of permit conditions.

Regulatory and/or good practice systems for pollution prevention are in use in some countries,
for example, see Reference literature, below. Many installations in the sector have benefited
from the introduction of such techniques. The following activities are key examples where these
techniques reduce the frequency and impacts of acute and chronic pollution of surface and
groundwaters and soil, and make the operations more cost effective:

routine and non-routine maintenance including maintenance of solutions, see Section
4.11
delivery and storage of raw materials, see Section 4.2.2
process control, process and environmental monitoring, see Section 4.1.

Key issues for delivery and storage of consumable raw materials are identified in Section 2.1.2
and environmental or health effects from chemicals are identified in Section 1.4.4. The BREF
on emission from the storage of chemicals also discusses these issues [23, EIPPCB, 2002]. In
surface treatment activities, the process solutions are usually kept in open tanks with connecting
pipework in situations analogous to the storage of chemicals and many of the same techniques
can be applied, such as double skinned tanks or contained areas.

Chapter 4
208 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Some key aspects of preventing pollution given in the Reference literature are:

the identification of hazards and pathways
a simple ranking of hazard potential
a three step implementation of actions for pollution prevention:
o primary measures (structural)
sufficient plant dimensions
selection of sealing materials where chemicals are stored or handled, e.g. for
flooring, contained areas
stability of the process line and components (including temporary and
infrequently used equipment, such as pumps and tanks used for occasional
maintenance operations)
o secondary measures (plant or equipment)
containment (or secondary containment) refers to additional protection against
storage tank releases over and above the inherent protection provided by the
tank container itself (in this sector, the tanks may be for storage or
production). There are two major types of secondary containment for
leakages, namely those that are part of the tank construction, such as, double
tank bottoms (only for aboveground tanks), double skinned and double walled
tanks and impervious barriers which are placed upon the soil surface below
the tanks
correct specification of size and strength of tanks to receive pumped-out
liquors (see also stability, in primary measures, above)
leak identification systems
o tertiary measures (management systems)
inspections, external experts and internal including regular maintenance
emergency plans for potential accidents (see Section 4.1.1)
test programmes.

The identification of pathways and targets for the environmental effects can determine the
choice of site, plant and equipment as well as design and construction of the infrastructure and
plant.

Achieved environmental benefits
Particularly useful in minimising contamination of soil and groundwater by routes that are not
readily visible and are difficult to identify.

Facilitates site decommissioning.

Minimisation of unplanned chronic and acute discharges to surface waters as well as municipal
waste water treatment systems.

Cross-media effects
No adverse implications.

Operational data
Careful planning and design utilising operational experience can make routine operation,
maintenance and monitoring easier, cheaper and environmentally safer.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 209
Single skinned tanks within a contained area are as secure as a double skinned tank; and any
leakage is easy to find earlier than within a double skinned tank. Containment and capacity are
discussed in the Reference literature (below): to fulfil its intended function the contained area
must be able to contain an expected spillage or leak and. as an example, the contained or bunded
volume is often 110 % of the volume of the largest tank contained within it. The contained area
can be a sealed area draining to either a big vat under the process tanks or a floor with a
chemical-resistant coat (within raised walls or drains or the floor is sloped to drains). During
cleaning or maintenance the contents (of the contained area) may be connected to (or, pumped
to) the appropriate waste water stream, but to ensure operational control of any spillages, the
connection should be operated under supervision, see Section 4.1.1.

Applicability
These measures can be considered for all installations; however they are best implemented at
the proposal and initial design and build stages. Many changes can be incorporated in major
upgrades, while some improvements can be made to existing installations during normal
maintenance periods, although retrospective improvement may be more difficult, and may not
be as effective. Various standards and guidance can also form part of longer term planning for
plant improvements.

Economics
These are part of the investment costs with initial investments or upgrades. Some techniques
may be no-cost options at a new build or upgrade stage. Often costs can be recovered by more
efficient working, maintenance, and the avoidance of costs for dealing with accidents and
breaches of permit.

Driving force for implementation
Business duty of care and possible liability for any environmental damage arising.

Example plants
Widely used in many countries.

Reference literature
[16, RIZA, 1999, 19, Eurofer, 2003, EIPPCB, 2002 #23, 23, EIPPCB, 2002, 42, SEA, 2001, 81,
INRS, 1998]

4.2.1.1 Oil tight trays

Description
Leakage of oil from hydraulic systems is a specific pollution prevention problem controlled by
the use of oil tight trays.

Achieved environmental benefits
Environmental benefit is medium, by minimising the possible release of oil to soil, surface
water, groundwater and soil.

Cross-media effects
None.

Operational data
The trays require checking and emptying as part of a maintenance programme.
Significant and/or repeated amounts of oil accumulating indicate maintenance problems with
the hydraulic system.

Applicability of the BAT
New and existing plants with significant hydraulic systems.

Chapter 4
210 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Economics
Installation costs for large scale coil plants are EUR 0.001 - 0.15/t and operating costs are EUR
0.001 - 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Efficient, clean and safer working environment (prevents slips by workforce).

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.2.2 Storage of chemicals

Description
See Section 2.1.2, and for more detailed information, Section 4.2.1 and the Storage BREF [23,
EIPPCB, 2002]. Many other documents also advise on good practice (for examples, see
Reference literature, below).

The key issues are to:

avoid generating free cyanide gas by storing acids and cyanides separately
store acids and alkalis separately
reduce the risk of fires by storing flammables and oxidising agents chemicals separately
reduce the risk of fire by storing in dry conditions, and separately to oxidising agents,
chemicals which are spontaneously combustible when damp. Mark the storage area of
these chemicals to avoid the use of water in fire-fighting
avoid the contamination of soil and water environments from spillages and leakages of
chemicals
avoid or prevent the corrosion of storage vessels, pipework, delivery systems and
control systems by corrosive chemicals and fumes from their handling.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of unplanned releases to the environment, particularly from fire-fighting.

Cross-media effects
None reported.

Operational data
Requires management of chemicals as they are delivered and used.

Applicability
All sites.

Economics
Construction costs of separate and/or contained storage areas.

Driving force for implementation
Occupational health legislation, EMS and other management systems, Seveso Directive [142,
EC, 1996] and water legislation, as well as PARCOM [12, PARCOM, 1992].

Example plants
CROPU S.A., Burgos, Spain

Reference literature
[16, RIZA, 1999, 19, Eurofer, 2003 October, 23, EIPPCB, 2002, VITO, 1998 #20, Agences de
l'Eau, 1996 #82, 42, SEA, 2001, 79, Loire-Bretagne, 1985, 81, INRS, 1998]
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 211
4.2.3 Process line type and construction

Description
Process line type is generally prescribed by various factors (see the introduction to Section 2).

The use of horizontal in-line production lines is ideal for PCB production, with the exception of
the generation of the primary images and etch resists. These lines often contain modules that can
be integrated.

Coils also lend themselves to integrated production lines, on both small and large scale.

In some installations it is possible to produce an encapsulated integrated surface treatment line
(see Figure 4.2), or integrate the surface treatment into the overall production (see Section 6.1).

Achieved environmental benefits
No fugitive air emissions in the installation.
High process control reduces chemical and water usage.

Cross-media effects
None.

Operational data
The precision automatic movement of components and high accuracy plating reduces process
time and improves quality.

Figure 4.2 Encapsulated integrated chromium plating line
[140, Atotech, 2003]

Applicability
For new build installation and lines. Most applicable where the parts have a high consistency of
shape and size, such as shock absorber (automotive damper) piston rods, PCBs, and coils of
steel and aluminium, etc.

Economics
High capital cost.

Driving force for implementation
Improved workplace environment.
Low production labour costs.
Chapter 4
212 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
High precision and quality.
Example plants
Monroe, ZF-Sachs, Arvin in US and Europe.
Sikel N.V., Genk, Belgium
Figure 4.2.
See Section 6.1.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003]

4.3 General operational issues

4.3.1 Protection of workpieces and substrates - before and after
treatment

Corrosion can take place on metal substrates prior to surface treatment and on treated surfaces
of metals and plastics after surface treatment and prior to dispatch. Corrosion may cause poor
adhesion of the surface treatment or damage decorative finishes and therefore require stripping
and reworking or scrapping. Corroded products are likely to require additional processing to
remove corrosion prior to surface treatment. Corrosion prevention can reduce the environmental
impacts associated with stripping and reworking (see Sections 2.3).

Most metal surfaces oxidise or corrode when exposed to oxygen or other factors in the
atmosphere. Corrosion time is dependent on the type of material and the conditions under which
the material is stored, for instance, steel components do not corrode in an atmosphere with less
than 50 % humidity. Humidity, temperature and acid atmospheres are factors determining how
quickly corrosion takes place. All these factors are present in surface treatment installations, so
controlling the exposure of stored products is important.

Protection of surfaces from mechanical damage is also important.

4.3.1.1 Shortening storage time

Description
Eliminating or shortening storage between operations, e.g. between manufacture and surface
treatment, or between surface treatment and dispatch, can avoid the need for other corrosion
prevention treatment. This may be as part of a formal JIT (just in time) system or as part of
good production planning.

Achieved environmental benefits
Prevention of stripping and reworking.

Applicability
Most applicable for in-house installations and where transport links are short and frequent.
However, this may not be applicable where customers are distant and economic transport batch
sizes require storage before and after processing.

Economics
The only foreseen costs are labour costs for planning and supervision of production and delivery
timing. Reduced capital and running costs for storage, as well as production costs for stripping
and reworking reject products.

Driving force for implementation
See Economics, above.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 213
Example plants
Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [118, ESTAL, 2003].
4.3.1.2 Storage and transport conditions

Description
It is usual to store components both awaiting treatment and treated away from humid and acid
air associated with many surface treatment installations. Good ventilation of the workplace will
assist(see design, Section 4.2), as will ensuring the vented moist, and often acid, exhaust air
does not come into contact with products in storage or awaiting transport. Ventilation of the
storage areas may also be used provided that it reduces moisture and does not draw in moist and
acid air. Moisture condenses on components which become chilled during transport or storage
and are subsequently delivered to a warm, humid location. Keeping products warm in transport
and storage in a low humidity environment can eliminate these problems.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduced stripping and reworking.

Cross-media effects
Increased energy usage for dehumidification or ventilation may be offset by environmental
benefits from decreased reworking.

Applicability
All locations. However, detailed application will vary with regional climatic conditions such as
normal humidity levels and daily mean temperatures.

Economics
Increased costs of energy usage for dehumidification or ventilation may be offset by savings
from reworking. The discounted capital cost of segregating storage may need to be balanced
with add-on measures such as improved dehumidification or ventilation.

Driving force for implementation
Economic and environmental savings from reduced stripping and reworking.

Example plants
SIKEL N.V., Genk, Belgium.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002]

4.3.1.3 Packaging

Description
Workpieces or substrates may be packed with absorbent or corrosion preventing materials such
as specialist papers or woodchips. Such materials can both prevent corrosion and prevent
surface damage in transit and are often specified by the customer, particularly for high value
components, such as printed circuit boards and aerospace components. Coils are usually
protected by the outer layers, with a protective strip providing immediate contact with flooring
and cradles preventing unwanted movement.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduced stripping and reworking.

Chapter 4
214 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Cross-media effects
Increased consumption of raw materials. This can be offset by selecting and using recyclable
packaging systems.

Applicability
Can be considered in all applications, but costs will be limiting for low added value
components.

Economics
Increased costs of packaging materials and labour may be offset by savings from reworking.

Driving force for implementation
See Economics, above.
Customer quality requirements.

Example plants
Sikel N.V., Genk, Belgium; Corus, Trostre Works, Llanelli, UK; SGI, Plaisir, France.

Reference literature
Site visits to example plants.

4.3.1.4 Corrosion prevention coating with oil or grease

Description
Oil and/or grease may be used for corrosion prevention during storage. The disadvantage is that
items have to be cleaned (see Section 2.3). When choosing the type of oil or grease, the degree
of protection required needs to be considered. However, this must be balanced with Section
4.3.2, below.

Achieved environmental benefits
Prevention of reworking and scrapping.

Cross-media effects
Increased chemical, energy and water usage to remove oil and/or grease.
Increased disposal to waste water and waste routes.

Operational data
Greases are often used for military applications when components are left in storage for long
periods prior to use. The duration of coating becomes significant when cleaning the components
at a later date. Long storage times especially during warm weather complicate cleaning.

Pure mineral oils are generally easier to remove compared with emulsions and vegetable-based
products. Vegetable-based oils and greases are often promoted as environmentally friendly
products, however these can be very difficult to remove especially if the product has been stored
during a warm weather period. This may be a more important factor in warmer regions.

Applicability
Suitable in some applications and often associated with minimising tool wear in pressing, etc.

Economics
The environmental and economic savings from the avoidance of stripping, reworking or
scrapping may offset or exceed the costs of avoiding corrosion.

Driving force for implementation
Economics, see above.
Customer requirements.

Reference literature
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 215
[3, CETS, 2002]
4.3.2 Minimisation and optimisation of coatings from previous
mechanical treatments - oil and grease

Description
Oil or grease is used to minimise tool wear, e.g. pressing sheet steel, drilling or drawing
operations, or for corrosion prevention prior to surface treatment and therefore the choice of
cleaning method begins early in the production process. Degreasing operations prior to surface
treatment can often be simplified by manufacturing and storing components in the correct way
rather than using excessive oil or grease. Some oils used in pressing can be ground into the
metal surface and are resistant to cleaning.

Any changes to remove or minimise oily coatings often take place at the mechanical production
stage. This may involve discussion with the customer (see Section 4.1.2, Specifications). By
changing the production method the use of oil can be minimised or eliminated. Oil usage can be
minimised by regularly assessing the application methods, type and quantity of oil used. Oil that
is compatible with the subsequent cleaning system should be used. Possibilities for reduction of
oil and grease applied in the mechanical production areas are included:

use of volatile lubricants
employment of minimal quantity cool lubrication
dripping off and/or centrifuging the workpieces
pre-cleaning the workpieces at the point of production
shortening the storage time, see Section 4.3.1.4
drilling with compressed air cooling
use of applied plastic film lubricants in pressing.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction in degreasing processing requirements including chemicals and energy consumption,
as well as wastes produced.

Cross-media effects
Consumption of energy and/or materials for alternative techniques, such as dry lubricant films
and air-cooled drilling.
Volatile lubricants contain VOC (volatile organic compounds), which are released to the air.

Operational data
Can be considered for all oiled workpieces/substrates.

Applicability
Case dependent. The use and type of oils and greases can be critically and constructively
discussed with all customers.

Economics
Case dependent: one installation quotes savings of EUR 25000 per year in oil applied by one of
their customers (year 2000 costs), plus uncosted savings in degreasing chemicals and energy,
labour and impacts on process quality.

Driving force for implementation
Subsequent process control improved; reworking reduced.

Example plants
Exhall Plating, Coventry, UK.

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002]; [104, UBA, 2003],[3, CETS, 2002]. [113, Austria, 2003].
Chapter 4
216 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.3.3 Jigging

Description
See Section 2.2. The correct jigging, whether using jigs with spring clips to retain the
workpieces, or wiring on with copper wire is important for several reasons:

correct current/area loading in the electrolytic process
minimising of drag-out, see Section 4.6.3
prevention of loss of workpieces:
o the dissolving substrates contaminates the process solution
o reflects badly on customer quality.

Achieved environmental benefits
Optimises metal usage.
Minimises material losses.
Reduces solution maintenance requirements.

Cross-media effects
None.

Operational data
Requires skilled labour.
Can be labour intensive.

Applicability
All jig plants.

Driving force for implementation
Process quality.

4.3.4 Agitation of process solutions

Description
It is good practice for process solutions to be agitated to keep a consistent solution concentration
throughout the vat. This replaces depleted solution at the surfaces and prevents the build-up of
gas bubbles and contaminants at the workpiece or substrate surface, giving uneven finishes,
pitting, etc. In barrel treatments, sufficient agitation is usually achieved by the turning of the
barrels and movement of the workpieces within.

Agitation of anodising solutions is essential to maintain a constant temperature in the bath and
remove heat from the surface of the aluminium.

The options are:

compressed air through nozzles
low pressure air
hydraulic turbulence
agitation of the workpieces by moving the flight bars or rods by cams or motors.

The use of compressed air gives high evaporative heat losses, especially when used in
conjunction with air extraction, see Section 4.4.3, as well as energy consumption by the
compressor. However, the energy losses may be negligible when used in very small tanks.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 217
Hydraulic turbulence is by a pumped system with eductor nozzles placed at the bottom of the
tank. Although the energy required is greater than that needed for traditional air or cathode rod
agitation, the energy loss through evaporation of water in air agitated tanks offsets the higher
energy usage of hydraulic turbulence.

Achieved environmental benefits
The energy consumption when using air agitated systems is considerable, see Section 4.4.3.

Cross-media effect
Air agitation may create or exacerbate sprays, mists or fumes of airborne particles or droplets.
These may contain chemicals harmful in the workplace and/or in the environment, if removed
by extraction systems.

Compressors for air agitation may be a source of noise.
Air agitation can be the source of large energy losses, see Section 4.4.3

Operational data
Hydraulic turbulence provides greater agitation than air systems. This results in improved
plating quality, reduction of rejects, and optimisation of proprietary additives consumption.

All systems need to be operated at a level that is effective in moving the solution, but does not
cause displacement of workpieces from jigs. Displaced parts left in the solution often cause
contamination problems (see Section 4.11).

Applicability
All process tanks requiring agitation.

Driving force for implementation
Costs saved in energy consumption, improved process quality, improved workplace health and
safety.

Example plants
Bodycote, Uxbridge, UK (formally West Middlesex Plating)

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002], [18, Tempany, 2002] [118, ESTAL, 2003].

4.3.5 Maintenance plant and equipment

Maintenance of all plant and equipment is an essential part of an EMS, see Section 4.1.1 (c)viii.

4.4 Utility inputs and their management

This section discusses the general usage of utilities and individual measures are described by
their specific activities, for example the optimisation of energy in air extraction systems is
discussed in air emissions, Section 4.18.2 and water-saving measures for rinsing in Section 4.7
In this section, energy inputs are discussed separately as electricity and heating. The reduction
of heating losses are discussed as a part of the heating section. Cooling is also discussed as it
uses water and/or energy. Water inputs are also considered.

Chapter 4
218 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Energy saving measures and systems involve the use of operating tools or equipment capable
of:
maximising the use of energy consumed by the installation, e.g. management of
incoming electrical supply
minimising the energy used to heat process solutions
minimising the energy (current) losses in electrochemical processes
minimising the energy used to cool process solutions
maximising the efficiency of other uses, such as air extraction and other electric drive
motors, and the operation of peripheral and recycling plants
optimising air extraction and space heating.

All utility inputs can be recorded on an actual basis, and split according to type and major end-
use on a specified basis, such as monthly, daily, hourly, etc. Inputs can also be benchmarked
and optimised against other production measures (see Section 4.1.3), such as surface area or
tonnage throughput, number of barrels, processing costs, etc. Action can be taken as described
in these Sections where there are variations from the benchmarks.

4.4.1 Electricity

4.4.1.1 Incoming high voltage supplies and large current demands

Description
Incoming supply should be managed to match phases, minimise reactive energy losses on step
down from high voltage and supply large current demand, etc.

On a large site, the energy is supplied at 150 kV and is rectified to 0.033 kV for use in the
galvanic cells. Typical rectifying operations involve the following steps:

step 1: two high tension transformers drop the voltage from 150 kV to 15 kV
step 2: 15 feeding cells drop the voltage for the rectifiers from 15 kV to 525 V
step 3: 60 rectifiers (one per anode, four per galvanic cell) drop the voltage from 525 V
to 33 V. Rectification is through thyristor bridges, transformers and diode bridges
step 4: supply to 15 galvanic cells. The length of the copper bus bars are short and water
cooled to minimise the resistance losses. This is achieved through:
o a very short distance between the rectifiers and the conductor rolls and anodes
o the connection of the conductor rolls and anodes through one (the same) side of
the cells
o the individual anode feeding allows an optimal current setting
step 5: compensation for the reactive energy.

Any AC electrical equipment such as transformers, motors etc., absorbs a total energy called the
apparent energy. This is made up of active energy (in the form of work or heat) and reactive
energy which is unproductive. The reactive energy increases if the current is out of phase in
relation to the voltage, and is the difference between the voltage and the current wave peaks.
The power factor (cos k) of an electrical device is the ratio of the active power P (kW) over the
apparent power S (kVA) and is the cosine of the angle between the peaks of the sine curves of
voltage and current. The closer cos k is to unity (1), the more efficient the use of power; the
lower cos k value, the less effectively the energy is used. When cos k lies permanently above
0.95, the reactive energy losses at 15 kV and 150 kV levels are limited.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimises energy losses.

Cross-media effects
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 219
None
Applicability
All installations using a three-phase supply. Power correction and reduction of reactive energy
requires skilled review of power demands and correction.

All installations using electrolytic processes can ensure reduction of resistance losses in power
supplies.

Economics
Energy losses as unwanted heating, reactive energy, etc. increase power consumption and cause
higher costs.

Driving force for implementation
Cost saving.

Example plants
Sikel N.V., Genk, NL.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003], (Personal communication, Fernando Dorado Nevas, Escuela Superior de
Ingenieros, University of Sevilla).

4.4.1.2 DC supply

Description
Energy savings can be attained through:

reduction of voltage drop in conductors and connectors
regular maintenance of rectifiers and contacts (bus bars) in the electrical supply system
installation of modern rectifiers having a better conversion factor than older types, when
run at maximum power
increasing conductivity of process solutions through additives, e. g. sulphuric acid in
acid copper baths, and by maintenance of solutions, such as lowering the iron and the
trivalent chromium content in hard chromium baths
modified wave forms (e.g. pulse, reverse) which may improve metal deposits. This is
widely used in PCB plating and is described in Section 6.2.

Achieved environmental benefits
In total, an energy saving in DC supply of 10 20 % may be expected.

Cross-media effects
Higher concentrations in solutions means higher drag-out of materials.

Economics
Lower power consumption and therefore lower costs.

Driving force for implementation
Cost savings associated with saving 10 20 % of DC supply.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 159, TWG, 2004]

Chapter 4
220 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.4.1.3 Energy efficient equipment

Description
It is good practice to install energy efficient equipment, such as energy efficient motors, see
Section 4.14.3.1.

Achieved environmental benefits
Power saving.

Cross-media effects
None

Applicability
Depending on the size of the unit and energy consumption, the use of energy efficient motors is
good practice for large applications. They can be specified for new installations, for the
replacement for defective motors or for cost savings.

Economics
For large scale applications, see Section 4.14.3.1.

Driving force for implementation
Cost saving.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.4.1.4 Optimising process electrical efficiency

Description
Addition of conducting chemical compounds to the electrolyte to increase the electrical
conductivity.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduces electrical power consumption. Environmental benefit is high compared with cost.

Cross-media effects
None

Applicability
To new and existing lines
This requires technical support, either in-house or from the supplier.

Economics
For coil plating, the initial investment is EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t installed, with operating and
maintenance costs of EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t installed.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency and cost.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 221
4.4.2 Heating of process solutions

Description
There are four main ways of heating process solutions, and they are by indirect heating coils
using:

high pressure hot water
unpressurised hot water
thermal fluids - oils
direct heating of individual tanks by electric (immersion) heaters or burners directly
installed at the surface treatment vats. Immersion heaters are often used to supplement
indirect systems.

Information from site visits revealed the following information:

high pressure hot water can be expensive to run and maintain
unpressurised hot water and thermal fluids may be cheaper to run
thermal fluid leakage may damage process solutions irrecoverably
hot water system leakage may dilute process solutions irrecoverably, although solution
may be recovered if leakage is corrected before dilution is significant.

Achieved environmental benefits

Cross-media effects
All process solutions may be damaged by leakages from heating coils, either by contamination
of non-aqueous thermal fluids (oils) or by dilution from water leaks.

Where immersion heaters or direct heating are used, it is advisable to monitor the level of liquid
in the tank. Heating a tank in this way as been known to dry the tank out and cause fire.

Operational data
High pressure hot water systems require specialist maintenance.
Other systems require monitoring of process solutions to ensure no leaks are occurring into the
solutions.

Economics
One installation claimed a payback period of 11 weeks for a EUR 96000 investment when
switching from high pressure hot water to a thermal fluid boiler. This figure is based on savings
following a period of exceptionally high expenditure for maintenance of the high pressure
system before the change over.

Driving force for implementation
Cost savings.

Example plants
Exhall Plating Ltd, Coventry, UK.

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002] [125, Ireland, 2003, 128, Portugal, 2003].

4.4.3 Reducing heating losses from process solutions

Chapter 4
222 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
It is normal practice to minimise heating losses from process solutions but actual techniques
used may depend on the options to re-use heat, the availability of renewable energy supplies and
local climatic conditions.
This section briefly describes heating losses in the surface treatment industries. More
information on cooling is available in the BREF on industrial cooling systems.

Description
Temperatures of heated processes can be monitored manually or automatically (according to the
size and energy demand of the vat being heated), with automatic and/or lockable controls.
Record and benchmark information and optimise heating according to Section 4.1.3.

Energy losses from the surface area of heated process solutions related to processing
temperatures are shown in Table 3.1 It demonstrates that the highest energy loss occurs from the
solution surface with air extraction and with liquid agitation. Air extraction above the surface of
process solutions enhances evaporation and thus the energy loss, see Section 4.3.4. Techniques
to reduce the volume of warm air extracted and reduce energy losses by evaporation are
described in Section 4.18.3.

Where there is a temperature range for a process, the temperature can be controlled to minimise
the energy input:

operating temperature of process solutions that require heating may be reduced,
processes that require cooling may be operated at higher temperatures.

Heated process tanks can be insulated to reduce heating losses by:

using double skinned tanks
using pre-insulated tanks
applying insulation.

Floating spheres are widely used to insulate the solution surface without restricting the access of
workpieces or substrates. They allow jigs, barrels, coils or individual components to pass
between them.

Process solutions may be heated by energy coming from process steps generating energy. Water
from the cooling circuit of various process solutions may be used to heat lower temperature
solutions, incoming air, etc. Alternatively, the hot cooling water is collected in a central tank
and cooled through a suitable heat pump. The gain in energy may be used to heat process
solutions with process temperatures up to 65 C, or to heat up water for other purposes.

Achieved environmental benefits
Energy saving.

Cross-media effects
None

Operational data
See Description, above.
Seek technical support when changing operating temperatures changes to processes.

Applicability
To all heated solutions.

Reducing the operating temperature of solutions will depend on support from the proprietary
process suppliers or in-house expertise in developing solutions or processes that are viable at
lower or higher temperature ranges. It may also be a factor in choice of process solution
chemistry (see Section 4.9).
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 223
Many solutions have a narrow operating range, and cannot be operated outside of these. Other
optimal operating factors may have to be considered, such as processing time.
In anodising, the heat of spent seal solutions can be used to heat the water used for a new
sealing process, using a heat exchanger or piping the incoming cold water through the hot seal
solution.

In automatic lines, floating spheres may be carried to the rinsing tanks by barrels or by
components. The spheres may block pipes and cause malfunctions for pumps and transport
tubes. This can be limited to some extent by the choice of size of spheres and installing simple
coarse screens to critical pipework and equipment. The spheres can cause tidiness problems in
the workplace by being carried outside of the tanks. The system can be used in manual lines,
and in automatic plants.

Economics
Applicable to all heated solutions.

Floating spheres are cheap.

Capital investment for sophisticated heat-exchange systems may be high.
Driving force for implementation
Cost saving and process quality control.

Example plants
Exhall Plating Ltd, Coventry, UK; SGI, Plaisir, France, Sikel N.V., Genk, Belgium

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 18, Tempany, 2002, 165, Tempany, 2004] [85, EIPPCB, ] [124, Germany,
2003] [118, ESTAL, 2003] [129, Spain, 2003].

4.4.4 Cooling of process solutions

4.4.4.1 Water cooling systems

Description
Once-through cooling systems pass cold water through the cooling system once, and then
discharge the water. Water sources are described in Section 4.4.5.1. Open cooling systems
recycle the water through an open cooling tower. Closed systems use a secondary system, such
as refrigeration, for cooling the recirculating coolant in the primary system. These are described
in Section 2.12.1.3 and more information is given in the BREF on industrial cooling systems

Water from once-through cooling systems may be re-used to utilise the heat gained, for instance
in rinsing prior to drying. The water may also be used in processes, with treatment as required,
see Section 4.4.5.1. Also, water used in the processes for rinsing may be used for cooling prior
to discharge.

Achieved environmental benefits
Using closed cooling systems saves water.

Cross-media effects
There may be energy associated with pumping the water in any system, and increased energy
consumption for refrigerated systems.

Once-through systems may deplete limited local resources, may become contaminated by
chemicals and the heat content may have an impact on local ecosystems.
Chapter 4
224 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Open cooling systems can be the source of legionella infections. Proper design, cleaning
maintenance and water treatment combined can generally minimise legionella counts but cannot
be expected to eliminate them entirely in every system. Therefore, the location and design of
cooling systems must also aim at minimising the distribution and transmission of legionella.

Operational data
It is not good practice to use:

discharge cooling water through waste water treatment plant, unless treatment is
necessary (such as to remove anti-corrosion additives)
use cooling water to dilute process waste waters.

Applicability
Closed recirculatory systems are widely used. The type of cooling system may be dependent on
water availability and local climatic conditions.

Where water resources locally allow, once-through systems may be used, particularly where the
water can be returned to the source.

Economics
Once-through water systems are only likely to be economic where the cost of the incoming
water is very low, including any charges or taxes for extraction, etc. However, they may be cost-
effective where the water is re-cycled or re-used elsewhere in the installation, see Section
4.4.5.1. Water used in the processes for rinsing may be used for cooling prior to discharge,
although for most situations and if other water saving techniques are in use, there is insufficient
water from such sources to provide sufficient cooling.

Driving force for implementation
Closed systems can offer cost savings in water usage for once-through systems and the cost of
maintenance of open cooling systems.

Example plants
Sikel N.V., Genk, Belgium, Exhall Plating, Coventry, UK, Industria Galvanica Dalla Torre
Ermanno e Figli SpA, Fontane di Villorba, Italy (re-use of heated water).

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002, 85, EIPPCB, , 159, TWG, 2004] [121, France, 2003] [159, TWG,
2004](personal communication, RIZA and Infomil NL).

4.4.4.2 Evaporation

Description
Evaporation is widely used to remove excessive energy from vats by evaporating water from the
process solution and maintaining the process temperature at the desired level. It can be
optimised by using an air agitation (see Section 4.3.4), an evaporation system or evaporator, and
may be used with cascade rinsing systems to conserve materials, minimise discharges, and can
assist with closing loops for materials (see Sections 2.7.4, 2.7.5, 4.7.11.2, 4.7.11.3 and 4.16.12).

Achieved environmental benefits
Evaporation combines process cooling with drag-out recovery and usually forms part of any
closed loop or zero discharge systems.

Cross-media effects
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 225
May require higher process bath temperatures with increased energy use and/or for drag-out
recovery.

May require energy input into the evaporator to evaporate sufficient water.

Condensed water may be re-used.

Operational data
Normally run as an integrated system with countercurrent rinsing to maximise drag-out
recovery and minimise process solution losses and therefore waste treatment. With sufficient
countercurrent rinsing stages and/or additional heating in the evaporator, loops can be closed for
certain materials.

For electrolytic processes, evaporators have less power input and costs are lower if the
processing temperature is as high as necessary to remove any electrolytic energy input by
natural evaporation from the solution surface (see Annexes 8.5 and 8.11).

Applicability
Can be used with solutions running at ambient temperatures.

Economics
Each kWh removed by evaporation is equivalent to 1.4 litres of water which can be balanced by
drag-out recovery containing process chemicals and reduced rinse-water. See Annex 8.11 and
for example calculations and sites for cost savings.

Driving force for implementation
If direct evaporation is used, then no capital investment is required. See Section 4.7.11 for
driving for solution recovery and minimum discharge processes.

Example plants
Merry Polishing and Plating, Wednesbury, West Midlands, UK, Frost Electroplating
Birmingham, UK, most plants in Annex 8.5 use evaporation but plants K and L (Annexes 8.5.8
and 8.5.9) specifically use evaporators.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 18, Tempany, 2002, 26, Envirowise, 2003] [104, UBA, 2003]

4.4.5 Water

4.4.5.1 Water supply, treatment and recycling/re-use

Description
Water is commonly from the municipal supply, although it may also come from boreholes or
surface waters such as rivers or lakes, depending on local resources and regulations. The types
of processes and customer specifications will require a minimum quality of water used.

Water may also be re-used from cooling, rinsing or after waste water treatment, see Section
4.7.8.

It is important when considering the re-use/recycling of water to have an overall approach for
the installation that considers the saving of water and raw materials, as well as waste water
treatment, see Section 4.7 (particularly Sections 4.7.8, 4.7.11, 4.7.12 and 4.7.13) and Section
4.16. Options may include combining compatible streams from different processes for
purification/recovery. This could include use of single fixed location recovery systems (e.g.,
centralized reverse osmosis/ion exchange for recycling rinse-waters from several process lines).
Combined strategies may be more cost-effective, due to economy of scale, unless there are
Chapter 4
226 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
substantially increased plant interface requirements. Point source systems may offer more
flexibility, redundancy, and reliability.

For basic uses such as cooling and floor and plant cleaning, only the suspended and/or (TDS)
content may be of importance and recycled water may be adequate; but depending on the
source, filtering may be required. For many process solutions and rinses, water similar in quality
to drinking water is satisfactory, again possibly with filtering. For high quality work or to
improve process and product quality water sources will require treatment to lower TDS to
demineralised or deionised water quality:

where the staining from TDS left from drying is critical, such as decorative finishes or
printed circuit boards, or
where there is interference in the process, such as anodising annealing.

Where incoming water is treated to reduce TDS, it may be more effective to treat and recycle
the waste rinse-waters, as the amount of dissolved salts added during the process rinsing may be
less than the amount in the incoming water.

Treatment options include (see Section 2.7):

filtration
deionisation/demineralisation
ultrafiltration
reverse osmosis.

The residues of these treatments will contain the retained solids and any saline solutions from
regeneration (deionisation/demineralisation). They may be discharged to the treatment plant of
the installation or directly to foul sewers, according to local environmental considerations.

Achieved environmental benefits
Water saving, where water is recycling or re-use.

Cross-media effects
Increased dissolved salts in waste waters from treatments such as reverse osmosis, deionisation,
Use of chemicals in deionisation.

Example plants
See German plants in Annex 8.5; BGT, Eindhoven, NL.

Reference literature
[166, RIZA, 2004]

4.4.5.2 Control of water usage

Description
Recording all water inputs on an actual basis, irrespective of the source costs enables usage
control (including internally treated supplies, see Section 4.4.5.1). This is achieved by metering
all usage points throughout the installation: on rinses, solution top-up, even in areas such as
washrooms, etc. This identifies areas of high water usage for appropriate corrective action.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 227
Figure 4.3: Example of locking flow valve
Menoni SA, France and Agence de leau Seine-Normandie

The usage can be monitored according to type and major end-use on a specified basis, such as
monthly, daily, hourly, etc. Inputs can also be benchmarked and optimised against other
production measures (see Section 4.1.3.1) such as surface area or tonnage throughput, number
of barrels, processing costs, etc. Where consumption is seen to be higher than external and/or
internal benchmarks, action can be taken in the areas to examine the cause(s).

When optimum water usage is established, flow can be maintained at an optimum usage rate
level by a variety of measures controlled by an authorised person, such as:

flow valves - it is good practice to use locking valves
conductivity, pH temperature or other process control measurements - this may be
automated, and can also be used to control static fill and dump systems, either manually
or automatically (see Section 4.7).

Achieved environmental benefits
Water consumption in one case has been reduced over seven years by 83 %, from 263636 m
3
to
31818 m
3
per year by installing about 70 water meters (usually 20 30 mm). Other installations
confirm significant savings can be made.

Cross-media effects
None reported.

Operational data
Maximum effect is gained when used in conjunction with locking flow valves set at optimum
usage rate and with other monitoring data, such as water usage per flight bar or per square metre
treated.

Applicability
To all installations.

Chapter 4
228 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Economics
Installations with direct raw water abstractions from resources that are fully and continually
replenished may not have a financial payback for the investment. Note that reduced water
consumption also means reduced water volume discharged, and this may reflect in lower cost
for discharge to municipal or third party water treatment plants.

Driving force for implementation
Rapid payback period where water costs are significant.

Example plants
Exhall Plating Ltd., Coventry, UK; Frost Electroplating Ltd., Birmingham, UK.

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002]

4.4.5.3 Rinsing stages using recycled water

Description
The technique may be regarded as an extension of the integrated treatment system (widely
known as the Lancy system). Water from a rinsing stage is re-used in another rinsing stage,
where the chemical or physical characteristics acquired in the first stage can be exploited in the
second stage without requiring any additional treatment.

As an example, in a nickel electroplating installation water from the rinsing stage after the
nickel plating process may be used again in a sequence of several rinsing stages:

1
st
: after cool electrolytic degreasing, then
2
nd
: after pickling, and eventually
3
rd
: after heated chemical pre-degreasing

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of water consumption up to 40 %.
Reduction of chemicals used to modify the pH of water after the rinsing stages.
Reduction of chemicals used to neutralise the water before to channel it into the treatment plant.

Operational data
The technique applies only to processes free of cyanides. It requires the laying of an appropriate
network of pipes and pumps.

Applicability
The technique may apply to new plants. It can be applied to existing plants, depending on local
circumstances.

Economics
No data available

Driving forces for implementation
Saving of water and chemicals.

Example plants
Coletto Danilo Srl, Padova, Italy. Industria Galvanica Dalla Torre Ermanno e Figli SpA,
Fontane di Villorba, Italy.

Reference literature
Lancy Laboratories Inc., Zelienople, Pa (US) quoted in Bertorelle E. (1974) Trattato di
Galvanotecnica. 4th Edition, Vol. II, Hoepli Ed. Milano, pp. 693 - 697.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 229
4.5 Drag-in reduction

Description
Drag-in can contaminate a process solution if is there is insufficient rinsing after the previous
processes. Drag-in of clean rinse-water can significantly dilute a process solution. Drag in can
be minimised by using an eco-rinse (or pre-dip), see Section 4.7.4, or by removing as much
rinse-water as possible, such as by air knives or wiper rollers for sheet or coil substrates. The
effects can also be minimised by using compatible chemical systems, see Section 4.6.2

Achieved environmental benefits
Extends the life of process solutions.

Cross-media effects
Spray from using air knives or blowers.

Operational data
See Description and Section 4.7.4.

Applicability
Eco-rinse cannot be used in all situations, see Section 4.7.4.

Economics
See Overall economics, Section 4.7.1

Driving force for implementation
Extending process solution life, improving process quality and reducing material costs in make
up chemicals.

Reference literature
[159, TWG, 2004, 165, Tempany, 2004]

4.6 Drag-out reduction

4.6.1 Preliminary remarks

Drag-out is described in Section 2.4.

A reduction of drag-out is an effective primary measure for:

minimising losses of chemicals in rinses
reducing the amount of rinsing required
reducing raw material costs
reducing quality and maintenance problems with subsequent processes
reducing environmental problems associated with rinsing waters.

Techniques to reduce losses of chemicals resulting from drag-out are outlined in this section
These are also applicable to other process specific sections e.g. coil coating, PCBs, etc.

However, elimination of drag-out is impossible.

Drag-out depends on a large variety of parameters and a reduction of this key step with many
impacts on the environment and the process can only be achieved by close co-operation of all
personnel involved. For this reason a thorough understanding of the complex interrelations of
many parameters is needed by the operational staff to improve the situation successfully, see
issues such as training in environmental management systems, Section 4.1.1
Chapter 4
230 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.6.2 Use of compatible chemicals

Description
The use of compatible chemicals (e.g. the use of the same acid in pickling or activating the
surface prior to an acid-based plating process) reduces the consequences of chemical drag-over
to the subsequent process.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimises loss of chemicals as they are used in the next process.
Minimises water use in intermediate rinsing.

Cross-media effects
May increase the need to top-up the chemicals in the first stage that would otherwise be
recovered from counter-flow rinsing, etc. (see Section 4.7).

Operational data
May increase maintenance requirements on the subsequent solution, e.g. removal of dissolved
contaminating metals.
Reduces the number of stages required in a process line by removing/reducing rinse steps.

Applicability
Applicable to all types of processing, but limited to where processes having compatible
chemistry can be used.

Economics
Low cost, depending on choice of chemical systems.

Driving force for implementation
Cost savings.

Reference literature
[CETS, 2002 #3; [104, UBA, 2003].

4.6.3 Reduction of drag-out jig (rack) processing

Description
Arrange the largest surfaces of the workpieces in a vertical position at the jigs (racks) allows the
adhering solution to run down to the bottom edge of the workpieces,

The longer dimensions of the articles are normally arranged horizontally and/or slightly inclined
to allow the adhering solution to run down, improving drainage.

The lower edge of all articles may be tilted to allow the droplets to cohere and facilitate dripping
down above the process tank.

When lifted out of the process solution, the jigs may be tilted in such a way that large droplets
can be formed faster and drip down from the lowest point of the suspended articles.
Allow sufficient drainage time above the process tank to let the adhering liquid to cohere and
form droplets which will drip from the articles

By slow withdrawal of the jigs from the process solution, the drag-out volume can be decreased
considerably. Therefore, slow withdrawal and a sufficient drainage time above the process tank
can significantly minimise drag-out. Withdrawal and dwell times given in Table 4.2 below are
valid for some specific processes and are given as indication only. The times vary according to
the specific processes.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 231
Process Minimum time withdrawal
(seconds)
Minimum time dwell
(seconds)
Plating 10 10
Cleaning/pickling 8 7
Passivation 10 10
Seals/lacquers 10 5
Table 4.2: Withdrawal and dwell times for jigs

Cup-shaped recesses are normally avoided where possible, and cup-shaped components are
jigged cup-side down on the incline so process solution is not carried into the rinse-water.

In some cases, arrangements can be made by dialogue with customers for components with high
drag-out retention, such as cup-shaped components, to be manufactured with drainage holes.

Dripping of process solution on other articles arranged lower on the jig is normally addressed by
suitable positioning of the workpieces.

Automatically or manually inserted draining pans below the jigs will collect any drippings and
prevent contamination of subsequent tanks and solutions (where immediately adjacent vats are
not used). A fast transfer of the racks from one tank to the next also minimises this.

Drag-out by jigs can be reduced by inclining supporting arms to avoid horizontal surfaces from
which the adherent solution cannot easily run off.

A normal inspection and maintenance task is to check the insulation coating of the jigs to ensure
smooth surfaces, with no fissures or cracks in damaged insulation to trap and retain solution. It
is good practice to regularly inspect jigs for defective insulation so they can be identified for
replacement or repair

Jig insulation coatings are normally hydrophobic to assist draining of drag-out.

Jigs may be rinsed or sprayed with water, or blown with air to remove dragged-out solution (see
Section 4.6.6).

Achieved environmental benefits
This is a key step in reducing the loss of soluble chemicals from process vats to the environment
via rinsing.

Cross-media effects
None reported.

Operational data
Where a rapid stopping of the surface reaction is required, this is often achieved by rapid
dilution of the remaining process solution on the surface, particularly for:

hexavalent chromium passivation
etching, brightening and sealing of aluminium, magnesium and their alloys
zincate dipping
pickling
pre-dip when activating plastic
activating prior to chromium plating
colour lightening after alkali zinc.

In some processes drainage time may affect the quality of the treated surface, such as where a
delay causes de-activation of, or damage to, the surface between treatments, such as between
nickel plating followed by chromium plating.
Chapter 4
232 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
For problems with blowing or spraying, see Section 4.6.6.
The dragged-out volume is:
d t
p a
A W

= 02 . 0
where:
Wis the volume withdrawn in cm
A is the surface area of the article in cm
a is the vertical length of the article in cm
p is the dynamic viscosity of the process solution in Poise (1 Poise = 0.1 Pascal second)
t is the withdrawal time in seconds
d is the density of the process solution.

The surface roughness of the articles was found to have no effect on the volume of drag-out.

Actual drag-out measurements can be determined by chemical or measuring the increase in
volume. In the absence of such data, the following typical data can be used for rack plating:

flat surfaces 0.1 l/m
2
contoured surfaces 0.2 l/m
2
the equation above is for flatter shapes. A typical value for cup shapes is 1 l/m
2
.
Applicability
All jig (rack) plants.

Economics
All these measures can be incorporated into the operation of any jig (rack) plant. Jigs have a
relatively short operating life, are not capital intensive, and design can be improved and
implemented over time. Correct positioning of workpieces on jigs is usually achieved by staff
training.
Other measures, such as draining and dwell time will depend on transporter control equipment
being used.

Increasing time for draining can reduce throughput and machine capacity.

Driving force for implementation
Cost savings in chemical usage and reduction in waste water treatment costs.

Reference literature
K. G. Soderberg (Proceedings of the American Electroplaters Society 24 (1936) pp.
233 - 249), [3, CETS, 2002] [118, ESTAL, 2003](personal communications, TWG members)
[113, Austria, 2003]. [104, UBA, 2003]

4.6.4 Reduction of drag-out barrel processing

Description
The plastic material of the barrel normally has a smooth surface and is inspected for worn areas
and the formation of recesses or bulges around the holes.

The bores of holes in the panels usually have a sufficient cross-section to minimise capillary
effects, and the thickness of the panels of the cylinder is just thick enough to meet the
mechanical strength requirements.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 233
The total proportion of the body of the barrel that is perforated is usually as high as possible to
allow the drag-out to drop back easily into the process tank. This also improves the efficiency of
the whole plating process by allowing easier solution access and decreasing voltage drop.

A further reduction of drag-out can be attained by intermittent rotation of the barrel above the
process tank while draining (such as rotating for about 90 degrees, stopping for at least 10
seconds, next sequence of intermittent rotation, etc.).

More reduction of drag-out can been achieved by the application of draining ledges within the
barrels to allow the draining liquid to flow together and to drain out of the rotating barrel.

Drag-out can be reduced dramatically by blowing excess solution out of the barrel while
draining over the bath. With hot baths, the barrels can be rinsed with water or sprayed (see
Section 4.6.6), although for barrels, sparging is more effective: sparging is where pipe is
constructed within the barrel and runs rinse-water inside the barrels and through the workpieces.

In a barrel, the workpieces usually lie with the main surfaces horizontal. To achieve better
draining, inclined lifting of the barrels from the tanks can be considered. The suspension and
hoisting systems may be adapted to this requirement. However, in conventional systems this is
difficult to achieve.

The application of mesh plugs instead of holes has proven successful, by reducing the length of
the bores in the panels of the cylinder body of the barrel. The drag-out can be decreased, and the
voltage drop at the perforation is effectively reduced.

Achieved environmental benefits
This is a key step in reducing loss of soluble chemicals from process vats to the environment via
rinsing.

Cross-media effects
When blowing out the barrel with air or water spray, care must be taken to ensure that the
removed solutions fall into the bath below, and to minimise droplets or particles in the air.
Removed solutions could be harmful in the workplace atmosphere, in the outside environment
and may contaminate other processes (see Section 4.6.6).

Operational data
As with jig plating, where a rapid stopping of the surface reaction is required, this is often
achieved by rapid dilution of the remaining process solution on the surface. In some processes
excessive drainage time may affect the quality of the treated surface, see Sections 2.5 and 4.6.3.
To minimise the volume of liquid dragged out, the barrel may be withdrawn from the liquid
slowly to decrease the drag-out effectively, with a sufficient draining time afterwards as
described in Table 4.3.

Chapter 4
234 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Table 4.3: Withdrawal and dwell times for barrels
CETS Italy, Assogalvanica

Actual drag-out measurements can be determined by measuring the increase in chemical
concentration in the first rinse or measuring the increase in volume.

Data for zinc barrel plating is given in Table 4.4 and Table 4.5:

760 mm barrel width 1200 mm barrel width
Flat and contoured surfaces 1 2 l/barrel 2 3 l/barrel
Cup shapes 2 4 l/barrel 3 6 l/barrel
Table 4.4: Drag-out retention, barrel diameter 380 mm with 8 mm holes

760 mm barrel width 1200 mm barrel width
Flat and contoured surfaces 2 4 l/barrel 3 5 l/barrel
Cup shapes 3 6 l/barrel 4 8 l/barrel
Table 4.5: Drag-out retention, barrel diameter 380 mm with 2 mm holes

In some processes, such as chromium passivation, excessive drainage time may affect the
quality of treated surface, see Section 2.5. Where a rapid stopping of the surface reaction is
required this is often achieved by rapid dilution of the remaining process solution on the
surface.

Applicability
All barrel process activities.

Economics
Many of these measures can be incorporated into the operation of any barrel plant. Barrels have
a limited operating life, require maintenance, are not capital intensive, and design can be
improved and implemented gradually.

Other measures, such as draining and dwell time, will depend on the transporter control
equipment used.

Minimum time
Process
Holes
(mm)
Withdrawal
(seconds)
Dwell
(seconds)
Stationary
periods (see Note*)
Plating 2 5 24 3 x 6
3 5 20 3 x 6
4 5 16 2 x 6
>6 5 12 2 x 6
Cleaning/pickling 2 5 24 3 x 6
3 5 20 3 x 6
4 5 16 2 x 6
>6 5 12 2 x 6
Passivation 2 5 16 1 x 6
3 5 12 1 x 6
4 5 8 1 x 6
>6 5 4 1 x 6
Seals 2 5 24 3 x 6
3 5 20 3 x 6
4 5 16 2 x 6
>6 5 12 2 x 6
Note*: barrel is rotated one, two or three times through 90 with a 6 second dwell period.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 235
Increasing time for draining can reduce throughput and machine capacity.

Driving force for implementation
Savings in chemicals and other inputs for degreasing. Reduction in wastes produced.

Example plants
Exhall Plating, Ltd, Coventry, UK.
Collini GmbH, Austria.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002],[113, Austria, 2003], [104, UBA, 2003] [165, Tempany, 2004](personal
communication, Martin Peter, GmbH, Collini GmbH)
4.6.5 Properties of process solutions effect on drag-out

Description
The drag-out also depends on the properties of the process solutions.

Drag-out can be reduced by raising the temperature of the process solution which normally
lowers the viscosity of the solution.

Lowering the concentrations of the process solutions will effectively reduce the drag-out, by
lowering the amount of material contained in the dragged-out solution, as well as reducing
surface tension and viscosity of normal ionic solutions.

The addition of wetting agents to the process solution reduces the drag-out by reducing surface
tension.

To avoid excessively increased concentrations, the process solution may be controlled to a
constant composition during regeneration and maintenance. This, and the selection of
appropriate process solutions, is an important step in the reduction of drag-out.

Achieved environmental benefits
This is a key step in reducing the loss of soluble chemicals from process vats to the environment
via rinsing.

Cross-media effects
Increasing the temperature of process solutions uses extra energy.
The addition of wetting agents increases in the amount of chemicals used.

Operational data
Reducing the concentrations of chemicals in solutions below prescribed levels will need
technical expertise in-house or from suppliers.
Ensuring constant compositions of process solutions is a part of SPC, see Section 4.8.1
Temperature sensitive brighteners may be affected by increased temperatures.

Applicability
All process solutions.

Driving force for implementation
Improved process control and costs.

Reference literature
[CETS, 2002 #3; UBA, 2003 #104, [124, Germany, 2003]

Chapter 4
236 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.6.6 Transition from drag-out draining to rinsing

Description
There is a close connection between minimising drag-out and the following rinsing steps. In
barrel plating, sucking off or blowing off a considerable part of the drag-out above the process
tank is a successful measure to reduce losses of process solutions.

A key measure for high drag-out reduction for uniform cross section workpieces or substrate are
squeeze or wiper rollers. They are used in coil processing see Section 4.14.5 and for PCB
manufacture see Section 4.15.2.

When jigs (racks) or barrels are being removed from a tank of heated solution, it is good
practice to drench it with a fog spray while it is still over the processing tank. This achieves a
reduction in drag-out loss, and the water used compensates for evaporation. This treatment can
be combined with a pre-rinse, returning water from the first static rinse to the process solution.
For removing solution adhering to, or trapped in, recesses, combined water and air jets may be
used above the process tank and within an empty tank, respectively.

Sloping drain boards of plastic material can be provided at the exit end of each tank. In effect,
these extend the draining period for the workpieces and return as much of the drippings as
possible to the tank of origin.

Achieved environmental benefits
This is a key step in reducing the loss of soluble chemicals from process vats to the environment
via rinsing.

Cross-media effects
Energy usage in compressed air for blowing drag-out off workpieces.

Blowing off or spraying can distribute aerosols of bath solutions within the workplace and via
extraction systems to the environment. Other processes can be contaminated.

Operational data
Blowing off or spraying jigs or barrels is difficult practice, and can be technically elaborate

Applicability
To all jig and barrel installations.

Economics
Costs in energy consumption and pumping may be offset by savings in chemicals and waste
water treatment

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [113, Austria, 2003].

4.7 Rinsing techniques and drag-out recovery

4.7.1 Introduction

This section must be considered in conjunction with Section 4.6 above, which highlights the
reasons for controlling drag-out and drag-in. This section discusses techniques for two
connected purposes [3, CETS, 2002]:

how drag-out (and drag-in) can be reduced by different means
how rinsing water consumption can be reduced.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 237
Section 2.4 describes the need for rinsing to reduce cross-contamination and/or deterioration in
the appearance of the workpiece by chemical attack or dried-on salts.

Some recommended rinsing ratios are given in Table 4.6:

Process Ratio
Post alkaline cleaner rinse 2000
Pre-cyanide process 5000
Post acid pickle rinse
Pre non-cyanide process 2000
Cadmium, silver, zinc (alkaline) 2000
Zinc (acid) 3000
Electrolytic nickel 5000
Autocatalytic nickel 10000
Post plating rinse
Chromium VI 15000
Post passivate rinse 5000
Table 4.6: Some recommended rinse ratios
[29, EA, 2001-3]

Drag-out of process solution and drag-in of rinse-water leads to continuous dilution and drop of
chemical concentration in process solutions. This is shown in Figure 4.4.

Note: The theoretical formulas have been used, as little operational data have been provided.
All formulas mentioned in this section provide exact theoretical results which do not concur
with practical experience. This is caused by (but not limited to) simple parameters such as
varying quantities of drag-out for different workloads, different rinsing efficiencies due to
differing shapes of processed components or changing concentrations of wetting agents in
process solutions.
Working hours (t)
C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
%
C
=
f
(
t
)
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 24 48 72 96 120
Jig plating
Barrel plating
Figure 4.4: Drop of chemical concentration in process solution due to drag-in of rinse-water and drag-
out of process solution without replenishing
Note: C=f(t) is concentration of process solution at time (t)

Chapter 4
238 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The concentration left in the process solution can be calculated:

C
0
n = C
0
{V/(V+D)}
n
C
0
n = concentration of chemicals in process solution after n work loads
C
0
= concentration of chemicals in process solution at start of operation
V = volume of process solution
D = quantity of drag-in/drag-out per work load (barrel or flight bar)
n = number of workloads processed.

Reference data for Figure 4.4:

Barrel plating:

throughput: 10 barrels per hour
drag-in/-out: 1.5 litres per barrel, 15 litres per hour
process solution: medium cyanide zinc
total volume: 6 m
processing temperature: ambient.

Jig plating:

throughput: 15 flight bars per hour (25 m of surface area to be
plated)
drag-in/-out: 0.4 litres per flight bar, 6 litres per hour
process solution: bright nickel, air agitated
total volume: 7.5 m
processing temperature: 60 C.

General cross-media and operational effects
Drag-out can be used as a means for regeneration of process solution, as it continuously
removes process-disturbing residues of degradation products from brighteners and other organic
additives. This ignores the simultaneous loss of valuable undegraded components. However, the
use of drag-out minimisation and recovery techniques are likely to increase the need for
properly designed techniques to reduce or remove contaminants in situ, see Section 4.11.

Overall economics
The economics for the recovery of materials and the reduction of water usage, vs. the cost of
increasing the number of rinse tanks in a rinsing stage, amendments to plant, etc. can be
calculated using the data in this section, with specific plant data. It can also be calculated using
software tools for plant optimisation, see Section 4.1.4. Annex 8.11 shows examples of rinsing
after cleaning, after pickling, after electrocleaning, after plating and in conjunction with forced
evaporation, as well as after passivation.

4.7.2 Evaporation as a requirement for drag-out recovery

Evaporation is described in Sections 2.7.4 and 2.7.5.Increased recovery of drag-out is made
feasible by using the used rinse-water to equalise the evaporation losses from process solutions.
Techniques for using and increasing evaporation are discussed in Sections 4.7.11.2 and 4.7.11.3.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 239
4.7.3 Benchmarking for rinsing

Benchmarks for rinsing are given in Section 3.2.2 and the method for calculating the rinse
volume of water per square metre per rinse stage is given in Section 4.1.3

4.7.4 Eco rinse or pre-dipping

Description
Some drag-out from process solutions working at (but not limited to) ambient temperature can
be recovered through a single rinse station in which the workload is dipped before and after
being processed. Figure 4.5 shows the sequence of workload transport schematically.

Eco
Rinse
0.5 C
0
Process tank
C
0
Work in
Work out
Figure 4.5: Drag-out recovery through eco rinse

The eco rinse station (or pre-dip) can be made up with diluted process solution from the very
beginning or filled with deionised water only. In this case it will take some time until the final
equilibrium concentration of 0.5 C
0
(50 %) will be reached. The solution only has to be changed
when the tank itself and/or the tank walls have to be cleaned.

An eco rinse tank can also be used in conjunction with other options to reduce water usage, see
Sections 4.4.5.2 and 4.7.

Achieved environmental benefits
During normal operation, no water has to be added assuming that drag-in is equivalent to drag-
out. Drag-out recovery rate (jig and barrel plating) is approximately 50 %.

Cross-media effects
None reported.

Applicability
Can be used for minimising chemical usage for metal plating baths, where the concentration of
metal and other ions must be increased by salts to maintain a certain level. For some processes,
pre-dip can cause problems, for example copper plating on dye-cast causes adhesion problems
because of partial premature chemical plating. Pre-dipping in eco rinses with solid particles can
also cause roughness in the following layer.

This may be considered where other alternatives are not achievable or as part of several rinse
steps.

Chapter 4
240 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
This cannot be achieved for:

where problems are caused with subsequent processes (such as partial chemical pre-
plating)
carousel, coil coating or reel-to-reel lines because work cannot be returned through
the pre-dip tank. A second tank could be installed after and coupled by a pumped
system, but this is not known in practice and would require the creation of another
tank in the line, which may be impossible with existing plant
etching or degreasing
nickel lines because of increased quality problems.

In anodising, material is removed from the substrate (not added) and the technique is not used.

Economics
See Overall economics, Section 4.7.1
An increase in the number of steps causes loss of machine capacity.

Driving force for implementation
Where the process solution is running at ambient temperatures and/or there is little evaporation
taking place.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [113, Austria, 2003].

4.7.5 Spray rinsing

Description
Spray rinsing may be carried out in two ways: over the process solution (as in Figure 4.6) or in a
separate empty tank.

Spraying prior to rinsing (or pre-rinse) above the process bath is an effective method of rinsing.
The rinsing water is sprayed onto the workpieces while they are still above the bath surface.
This may be manually for small process lines, or automatically. For the pre-rinse, the amount of
water to be used should equal that dragged-out from the process tank to maintain the water
balance. The pre-rinse causes a direct feedback of process solution into the process tank.

Spray rinsing in a separate tank acts as a first rinse. The solution can then be recycled back to
the process solution in amounts equal to evaporative and drag-out losses.

Figure 4.6 Manual spray rinsing
Producmetal S.A., France
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 241
Achieved environmental benefits
This is a key step in reducing the loss of soluble chemicals from process vats to the environment
via rinsing.

Cross-media effects
There is a risk of legionella bacteria infecting in the pipe ends of spray systems and being
spread in the spray aerosols.

Operational data
Spraying above the bath recovers the process solution directly back into the tank. No additional
tank is required. However, overspray may cause problems, but can be controlled in various
ways, for example:

in anodising, spraying is used at low pressure, referred to as splash rinsing, which
avoids the creation of aerosols and over-spraying
spraying in a tank reduces over-spray.

Legionella infection can be prevented by design of the spray systems or regularly cleaning.
Testing may be required.

Applicability
Can be considered for all installations, but may be limited where there is a risk of drying and
residues being left on workpieces or substrate prior to further rinsing or processing.

Example plants
SGI, Plaisir, France.
See reference plants in Annex 8.5.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003] (Personal communication from ESTAL)

4.7.6 Manual or semi-automatic lines

Description
Manual or semi-automatic lines are used for small production throughput, or for development
work. Controlling water usage, drag-in and drag-out may appear more difficult. To achieve
adequate draining time on a manual line, the jig or barrel should be supported on a static rack
over the preceding bath.

This enables spray rinsing (see Section 4.7.5) to be carried out directly above the treatment tank
to return the drag-out and/or allows draining to be properly timed before immersion in a rinse.

In semi-automatic lines, spray rinsing can be also carried manually, see Section 4.7.5 and Figure
4.6

Achieved environmental benefits
As for drag-in and drag-out control, see Sections 4.5 and 4.6

Cross-media effects
None

Operational data
Ensures better reliability and repeatability of rinsing and draining for automatic and semi-
automatic lines.

Chapter 4
242 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The amount of spraying above a treatment process needs top be controlled to avoid exceeding
the drag-out and evaporative losses.

Applicability
All manual and semi-automatic lines.

Economics
Cheap and easy to install.

Driving force for implementation
Health and safety of staff using manual lines.

Example plants
Bodycote West Middlesex Plating Co. Ltd., Uxbridge, UK.

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002, 165, Tempany, 2004]

4.7.7 Chemical rinses

Description
An accelerated technique to achieve the required cleaning efficiency is obtained by means of
chemical rinses called the Lancy process. Here the dragged-out process solution is reacted
chemically with the rinsing liquid at the same time.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduces the effluent treatment capacity required by reducing or eliminating the primary waste
water treatment stages.

Cross-media effects
The main use of the Lancy process, the oxidation of dragged-out cyanides by rinsing in chlorine
bleaching caustic solution, is now reduced because of concerns about the associated AOX
generation.
The processes make recovery of dragged-out solution impossible.

Operational data
Technically simple to operate.

Incorporation of chemical rinsing can reduce the number of rinse stations with a consequent
increase in contaminated rinsing.

Can lead to large sludge build up in the rinsing tanks. There is a danger of gas build up if the
automatic dosing fails.

Applicability
Requires a suitable chemical reaction that can readily take place in the conditions of the first
drag-out tank. The main uses are:

oxidation of cyanide
reduction of hexavalent chromium.

Limited contact time may not eliminate the target chemical, especially cyanide. This limits the
usefulness to the reduction of Cr(VI), particularly where workpieces have complex geometry
and retain Cr(VI) solution. The usual system is a vat after the chromium bath with sulphuric
acid and sodium bisulphite.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 243
Driving force for implementation
Can be used where waste water treatment capacity is limited.

Reference literature
[IHOBE, 1997 #6; UBA, 2003 #104[3, CETS, 2002, 6, IHOBE, 1997] [124, Germany, 2003]
Lancy Laboratories Inc., Zelienople, Pa (US)

4.7.8 Regeneration and re-use/recycling of rinsing water

Section 4.4.5.1 highlights how water can be regenerated and re-used, and that this should be
considered in the context of the water usage for the whole installation.

Spent rinse-water can be regenerated, such as by one of the techniques described below (for
other possibilities, see Section 4.10). This can lead to savings in water consumption and will
reduce to amount of waste water to be treated, reducing the waste water treatment costs for
capital investment, energy usage and chemicals. However, this has to be offset by the cost of the
regeneration equipment and the power and chemicals that this may incur. Where incoming
water is treated, it is often easier and cheaper (in terms of capital deployed, chemicals and
power) to recover the rinse-water than to treat fresh incoming water, as the ionic concentration
or TDS in the incoming water may be higher than that of the rinse-water.

The cross-media effects for one application have been investigated, see Section 4.7.8.2 [159,
TWG, 2004, 166, RIZA, 2004].
4.7.8.1 Regeneration by ion exchange

Description
By feeding the rinsing water through cation and/or anion exchangers, the cations become
exchanged for H
+
, and the anions for OH, and water of a quality approaching demineralised
water is achieved. This is fed back to the rinsing system.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimised water usage.

Cross-media effects
Construction and operation of the ion exchanger with consumption of energy and regeneration
chemicals.

Operational data
A filter is used before the ion exchanger for protection against blocking by solid particles.

Applicability
An ion exchanger to regenerate rinsing water is not usable if strong oxidants, high
concentrations of organic material, and metal cyanide complexes are present. To regenerate
highly concentrated rinsing waters, large scale installations and frequent regeneration of the
system are needed, e.g. with HCl or H
2
SO
4
and NaOH.

The resins do not usually remove organics, which will accumulate in the rinsing water. This
may require additional treatment. If not, in a system with a central ion exchange plant, the
organics may be spread to all processes and might interfere with other processes, such as the
rinse recovery, unless additional cleaning processes are added, such as activated carbon
filtration, or the use of the recycled water is limited to selected uses.

Ion exchange may become impractical for use with total dissolved solids concentrations above
500 ppm, due to the need for frequent regeneration.
Chapter 4
244 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Resins have different effective pH ranges. For example, iminodiacetate chelating resin works
best in a slightly acidic range; selectivity is lower at higher pH and below a pH of
approximately 2.0.

Oxidants, solvents, organics, oil and grease can degrade resins and suspended solids can clog
resin columns.

Economics
Capital cost of equipment versus savings in water usage will be site-specifc.

Example plants
Richard (Argenteuil), SATEC (Buchelet), SEAM (les Mureaux), France

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003], [114, Belgium, 2003, 124, Germany, 2003, 162, USEPA, 2000]

4.7.8.2 Regeneration by reverse osmosis

Description
Rinsing water can, in some cases, be regenerated by reverse osmosis (this process is described
in Section 4.7.11.5).

Achieved environmental benefits
The achieved environmental benefits are more than just a reduction in water usage and extend to
energy savings and a significant reduction in chemical use in waste water treatment.

Cross-media effects
Construction and operation of the ion exchanger with consumption of energy and regeneration
chemicals. The salt content of the residual water is high and may be difficult to treat in a typical
waste water treatment plant. The membranes also need rinsing with fresh water.

Applicability
The water to be treated may not be suitable or may need pretreatment because of solids or
undissolved particles, organics, calcium, aluminium and heavy metals, see Section 4.7.11.5

Example plants
BGT Eindhoven, Netherlands

Reference literature
[126, Netherlands, 2003].

4.7.9 Single rinsing techniques

Description
In certain situations, single rinsing operations are necessary (see Section 4.6.3). This may be
where there is a loss in quality if there is too much rinsing of the surface, for example, black
passivation zinc, thick film passivations or rinsing between nickel and bright chromium
In other cases, the stopping of the surface reaction succeeds only when there is quick dilution in
the first rinsing stage, which requires the use of high quantities of water. In such cases, the
concentration of the reacting chemicals in the first rinsing stage must kept low.

Other examples are manual or semi-automatic lines with small production throughput, or used
for development work, see Section 4.7.6 above.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 245
To minimise environmental impacts:

water used here may be regenerated and recycled within the process, e.g. by a deioniser,
or water regenerated from elsewhere may be used
where technically possible, having compatible chemistry for the preceding and
subsequent solutions can minimise the need for rinsing (e.g. same acid base), see
Section 4.6.2.

Achieved environmental benefits
Steps to minimise impacts are described in Description, above.

Cross-media effects
High water consumption and material losses.

Operational data
Multi-stage rinsing may damage surface treatment, such as reducing corrosion resistance.

Applicability
See Description, above.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003],[113, Austria, 2003, Germany, 2003 #124]

4.7.10 Multiple rinse techniques

General description
Multiple stage rinsing is particularly suitable to achieve a high rinsing rate with a small amount
of rinsing water.

For example, in cascade rinsing, the water flows in the opposite direction to the workpieces, as
shown in Figure 4.7. This results in a rinsing water requirement of constant rinsing quality (the
rinsing ratio), and is mathematically expressed in the term:

Q/t = rinsing water amount (in l/h) required to reach the rinsing ratio
n = rinsing stage number
Sk = rinsing ratio
V/t = drag-out (in l/h)

The main effect of saving is reached with the transition from the first into the second stage. As
Table 4.7 shows, a smaller rinsing quantity of water can be achieved by the selection of the
correct rinsing system. The effect of water saving decreases with an increasing number of
rinsing stages. However, the volume of water required decreases to the point where direct make
up for water losses from process solutions at ambient temperatures can be considered. The
achievable recovery rate is, at a given volume of evaporation, directly related to the
concentration of process chemicals in the first rinse station.

Chapter 4
246 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Rinsing ratio(x:1) 10000 5000 1000 200
Number of stages Necessary rinsing quantity of water in l/h
Single stage 10000 5000 1000 200
Two stages 100 71 32 14
Three stages 22 17 10 6
Four stages 10 8 6 4
Five stages 6 5 4 3
Table 4.7: The rinsing ratio is a function of a specific rinsing quantity of water (expressed as litres of
rinsing water per litre of dragged-out electrolyte) given and the number of cascades
[3, CETS, 2002].

Some options and variations are outlined in Sections 4.7.10.1, 4.7.10.2, 4.7.10.3 and 4.7.10.4.
They may be used in conjunction with other techniques, such as those described in Sections
4.7.1, 4.7.4, 4.7.5, 4.7.7, and 4.7.8.

Only a description of each option is given, other factors are described in this general section.

Water
Process vat Triple counter-flow rinse (cascade)
Work pieces
Water
Figure 4.7: Multi-level rinsing technology (cascade technology)
[104, UBA, 2003]

Overall achieved environmental benefits for all options described
Multiple rinsing techniques play an important role in reducing water usage and materials
recovery. The zero discharge (or squared water balance) is often seen as the ultimate criterion of
the rinsing technology for a surface treatment process low in emissions and requires additional
techniques to prevent all water discharges (see Section 4.16.12), However, closing the loop for
materials for specific process chemistries within a process line is more readily achievable, see
Section 4.7.11.

Closing the loop for a process requires the water returned to the process solution from the first
rinse station to be brought into balance with the water lost in evaporation and drag-out. Process
solutions operated at higher temperatures and with multi-stage rinsing offer possibilities for this
(see Sections 4.7.11.2 and 4.7.11.3). By the introduction of multistage rinsing systems partly
combined with a rinsing water recycling system and other techniques (see Section 4.7.11) and
decreases of waste water of up to 90 % can be obtained. One coil coating plant reports a
reduction of 30 m
3
per hour.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 247
Table 4.8 shows drag-out recovery rates achievable with different multiple rinse techniques,
taking the respective values of the reference lines as basis. Good practice for the rinse criterion
after both main processing steps is a minimum R =1000,for the examples given here: medium
cyanide zinc barrel plating and bright nickel jig plating (see Table 4.7).

Rinse technique
Recovery rates
Medium cyanide zinc barrel
Recovery rates
Bright nickel,
jig
Triple counter flow rinse <24 % <57 %
This technique does not provide satisfactory recovery rates in a barrel plant since
WD>3WR (see formulas, 4.7.10.1). If no major additional investment is necessary, a rate
of 57 % in jig plant seems attractive.
Triple static rinse >40 % >95 %
The necessity of changing rinse-water already after less than eight hours operation in
barrel plating plant makes this technique difficult to apply, whereas in jig plant the rinse-
water has to be changed no earlier than 56 hours operation and the recovery rate
of>95 % can be attained again without major additional investment
Dual static rinse plus flow rinse >90 % >98 %
When a high drag-out recovery is required, this technique should be used in barrel
plating. Changing of rinse-water is required after 24 hours operation. The installation of
an appropriate ion exchanger plant or a counter-flow rinse system will minimise the use
of water.
Table 4.8: Achievable recovery rates for some multiple rinse techniques

Overall cross-media effects for all options described
There are none for multiple rinsing on its own.
If used in conjunction with other techniques, there may be increased energy if evaporation or
other concentration techniques are used (see Section 4.7.11) and chemicals for regeneration if
deionisation is used

Overall operational data for all options described
A combination of spray rinsing, particularly if carried out over the process solution, as part of a
multiple rinsing system may combine the advantages of multiple stage water usage reduction
with minimum extra space requirement. It may also reduce water usage further.

Overall applicability of all options described
There are options and combinations suitable for most types of installations. In some cases, this
may be limited by the need for single rinsing, see Section 4.7.9.

A build-up of breakdown materials which may reduce process quality is likely unless other
solution maintenance measures are taken, see Section 4.11.

Overall economics for all options described
Generally the installation of multistage rinsing techniques is associated with higher space
requirement and higher investments (costs for additional tanks, workpiece transport equipment
and control). The decrease of the water consumption, recovery of process chemicals and the
smaller effluent discharge, which requires a smaller waste water processing facility and less
treatment chemicals, reduces the total costs.

The economics for the recovery of materials and the reduction of water usage, vs. the cost of
increasing the number of rinse tanks in a rinsing stage, amendments to plant, etc. can be
calculated using the data in this section, with specific plant data. It can also be calculated using
software tools for plant optimisation, see Section 4.1.4and Annex 8.11 for examples of rinsing
after cleaning, after pickling, after electrocleaning, after plating and in conjunction with forced
evaporation, as well as after passivation.

Chapter 4
248 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
One example plant avoided the need to construct a waste water treatment plant by using
multistage cascade rinsing combined with process solution evaporation, see Section 4.7.11.3.

Overall driving force for implementation for all options described
See Overall economics for all options, above.
Example plants
SGI, Plaisir, France, Sikel N.V., Genk, Belgium, Exhall Plating Ltd, Coventry, UK. Frost
Electroplating Ltd., Birmingham, Merrydale Ltd, Wednesbury, UK; Bodycote Metallurgical
Coatings, Uxbridge, UK, Annex 8.5.8, Germany

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 18, Tempany, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003], [159, TWG, 2004]

4.7.10.1 Multiple stage counterflow rinse

Description
This is shown in Figure 4.8, with drag out recovery. The rinse ratio R achievable with counter
flow rinsing can be calculated as

R = C
0
/Cn = (q
(n+1)-
1)/(q-1)

where q = W/D

R = rinse ratio
C
0
= concentration of chemicals in process solution
C
n
= concentration of process chemicals in last nth rinse station
D = quantity of drag-out,
n = number of counterflow rinses

W = quantity of rinse-water to achieve R at a given D,

A triple counter flow recovery rinse is shown in Figure 4.8, below.

W
W
R
D*C
0
E
D*C
3
Process tank
C
0
Rinse 1
C
1
Rinse 2
C
2
Rinse 3
C
3
Holding tank
W
R
W
D
= W - W
R
Figure 4.8: Recovery of drag-out with a triple counter flow rinse
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 249
In cases where E o W, the drag-out recovery rate is:

Rc
R
= 1 C
3
/C
0
In cases where E = WR <W, drag-out recovery rate is reduced to:

Rc
R
= (1 C
3
) * W
R
/W

C
0
= concentration of chemicals in process solution
C
3
= concentration of process chemicals in rinse station 3
E = evaporation losses
Rc
R
= recovery rate of drag-out
W = quantity of rinse-water used
W
D
= quantity of rinse-water to be discharged
W
R
= quantity of rinse-water available for drag-out recovery.

Figure 4.6 shows the specific water consumption of triple and quadruple counter flow rinses in
litres per litre drag-out.

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
500 1000 2000 4000
Rinse criterion (dilution)
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
w
(
l
/
l
)
Triple Quadruple
Figure 4.9: Specific water consumption w of triple and quadruple counterflow rinses

4.7.10.2 Multiple static rinse

Description
Multiple static rinsing instead of counter flow rinsing allows for reduced water consumption [3,
CETS, 2002].

Figure 4.10 shows the arrangement of tanks and the process sequence of a triple static rinse.

Chapter 4
250 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
W
R
W
R
D*C
0
Process tank
C
0
Rinse 1
C
1
Rinse 2
C
2
D*C
3
Holding tank
E
Rinse 3
C
3
W
D
= V - W
R
Figure 4.10: Recovery of drag-out with triple static rinse

Instead of continuous inflow and overflow, rinse 1 is discharged into holding tank only when C
3
has reached its set value. Rinse-water from tank 2 than is pumped into tank 1 and water from
tank 3 into tank 2. After tank 3 has been filled with fresh water, processing can be continued.

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
R=500 R=1000 R=2000 R=4000
Rinse criterion (dilution)
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
r
i
n
s
e
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
w
(
l
/
l
)
W
1
W
2
Figure 4.11: Specific water consumption in litre per litre of drag-out W
1
triple static vs. W
2
triple counter
flow rinse
(Values for W
1
valid when all three tanks are filled with fresh water)

As Figure 4.11 shows, savings of water compared with counter-flow rinsing are substantial:
savings of approximately 45 %, when all rinse tanks are filled with fresh water, and
approximately. 40 %, when water from tank 2 has been filled into tank 1 and tank from tank 2,
as it is done at normal operation.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 251
The concentration of process chemicals in static rinses 1, 2, 3 can be calculated with the
following equations:

C
1
n = C
0
(1-q
n
)
C
2
n = C
0
{1-(n+1) * q
n
+ n * q
(n+1)
}

C
3
n = C
0
{1-(1/2) * (n+1)(n+2) * q
n
+n * (n+2) * q
(n+1)
(n/2)(n+1) * q
(n+2)
}
C
0
= concentration of chemicals in process solution
C
1, 2, 3
n = concentration of process chemicals in rinse station 1, 2, 3,
etc. after n workloads rinsed
D = quantity of drag-out
n = number of workloads rinsed
V = volume of water per rinse station.
q = V/(V+D)

4.7.10.3 Dual static rinse followed by final flow rinse with recirculated water

At comparatively high drag-out rates, even triple counter flow or static rinses might not be
sufficient for satisfactory drag-out recovery. A modified triple rinse is shown in Figure 4.12.

W
R
W
R
D*C
0
Process tank
C
0
Rinse 1
C
1
Rinse 2
C
2
Rinse 3
C
IEX
D*C
2
Holding tank
E
IEX
Figure 4.12: Dual static rinse followed by single flow rinse with recirculated water, continuously purified
in ion exchangers (IEX)
[104, UBA, 2003]

Description
Rinse 1 is discharged into a holding tank after a period of time depending on the mode of
operation of the line. In this example, this would be after three shifts or 240 rinsed barrels
(Figure 4.12).

Chapter 4
252 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Number of work loads rinsed (n)
C
h
e
m
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
C
1
,
2
n
/
C
0
)
C
1
/C
0
C
2
/C
0
Figure 4.13: Increase of chemical concentration C
1
and C
2
related to number of rinsed barrels

This technique allows for concentrations C
2
p 0.2 C
0
, equalling an average value of
approximately 0.095 C
0
, starting from 0 and ending at 0.2 C
0
. The area below curve C
2
/C
0
is
equivalent to the quantity of chemicals loaded on the ion exchangers. The design flowrate of
recirculated water has to be high as the ion concentration must not exceed 2 mVal per litre.

The final rinse in recirculated water provides a sufficiently high rinse rate (or criterion) at low
water consumption (approximately 5 % of flowrate).
Reference Literature
[3, CETS, 2002]

4.7.10.4 Multi-cascade rinsing with limited process line space

Description
In the case of existing plants, the use of a larger number of tanks is often not possible within the
plant because of reasons of space. In such cases, the employment of so-called external cascades
(where the cascades are external to the process line) may be possible. In the treatment line there
is only one rinsing tank per process step. Each rinse tank is connected to several external tanks
which work as rinsing stages according to the cascade principle. The workpieces or substrates
are brought into the rinsing tank and rinsed successively with the water from the individual
rinsing stage tanks, becoming progressively cleaner. Rinsing can be by sprays or filling the tank
to immerse the workpieces or substrates. Figure 4.14 shows a spray rinsing system with the first
rinse holding tank being concentrated. The concentrate is returned to the process solution and
the cleaned water returned to the final rinse holding tank. Concentration techniques are
described in 4.7.11.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 253
Concentrator
Treatment vat
Spray booth
Rinse 1 Rinse 2
Rinse 3
Water
Concentrate
Work pieces
Figure 4.14: External cascade system: Single spray compartment with external cascade and concentrate
recycling

Operational data
Gives quality problems if rinse-water contains solid particles, especially with alkaline water

Reference Literature
[104, UBA, 2003], [113, Austria, 2003].
4.7.11 Increasing drag-out recovery rate and closing the loop

Where the quantity of water needed for appropriate rinsing (to achieve process control and
product quality) exceeds evaporation losses, and recovery rates>90 % are expected, the amount
of water in the drag-out recovery system has to be decreased. This is achieved by a combination
of techniques.

In some cases, drag-out can be recovered until the loop can be closed for process chemicals by
applying a suitable combination of techniques. Closing the loop refers to one process chemistry
within a process line, not to entire lines or installations,

Closed loop is not zero discharge: there may be small discharges from the treatment processes
applied to the process solution and process water circuits (such as from ion exchange
regeneration). It may not be possible to keep the loop closed during maintenance periods.
Wastes and exhaust gases/vapours will also be produced. There are also likely to be discharges
from other parts of the process line, such as rising after degreasing or etching.

Increasing drag-out recovery can best be considered with other processes and activities, such as
recycling and re-using water and an overall approach derived for the installation, see
Operational data, below.

Chapter 4
254 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Increasing drag-out recovery and closing the loop require techniques to:

reduce drag-out, see Section 4.6
reduce rinse-water (such as by cascade rinsing and/or sprays) with drag-out recovery,
see Section 4.7
concentrate the returning drag-out or receiving solutions, such as by ion exchange,
membrane techniques, or evaporation, see Section 4.10. The water removed during
concentration (such as from evaporation) can often be recycled back into the rinse.

Examples of techniques for this purpose are, for example:

addition of an eco rinse tank
evaporation using surplus internal energy
evaporation using additional energy (and in some cases, low pressure)
electrodialysis
reverse osmosis.

The principle of rinse-water removal and chemical concentration is shown in Figure 4.15. The
concentrate is used to replenish the process solution whilst the condensate can be reutilised as
rinse-water.

D*C0 D*C1 D*C2 D*C3
WR E
Process Tank Rinse 1 Rinse 2 Rinse 3
C
0
C
1
W
Concentrator
W
Holding tank Holding tank
Rinse water
Dilute fraction
W
D
= W - W
R
C
2
C
3
Figure 4.15: Rinse-water and chemical recovery through concentration

Achieved environmental benefits
See Overall achieved environmental benefits, Section 4.7.10.

Closing the loop achieves a high raw material utilisation rate and in particular can:

reduce the use (and therefore cost) of raw materials and water
as a point-source treatment technique, achieve low emission limit values
reduce the need for end-of-pipe waste water treatment (e.g. removing nickel from
contact with effluent containing cyanide)
reduce overall energy usage when used in conjunction with evaporation to replace
cooling systems
reduce the use of chemicals for treating the recovered materials that would otherwise be
discharged in the waste water
reduce the loss of conservative materials such as PFOS where used.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 255
Cross-media effects
See Overall applicability, Section 4.7.10.
The lifetime of the process baths may be affected by the recycling of contaminants, and may
require additional maintenance.
Energy is used for concentration techniques, although this is less for processes that gain heat
from the electrochemical reactions, such as hexavalent Cr(VI). Energy is also used for pumping
and pressure filtration techniques.
Chemicals are used in some concentration techniques, such as ion exchange.

Operational data
See individual techniques, Section 4.7.10.1 to Section 4.7.10.4.

It is good practice to consider increased drag-out recovery with other options for the whole
installation. These can include combining compatible streams from different processes for
purification/recovery,

Applicability
Increasing drag-out recovery is widely practised. Some techniques require additional energy,
which means cost, which may be offset by savings in cooling energy and drag-out recovery. The
chemical content of the rinse-water to be processed also affects the appropriate choice.
Closing the loop has been successfully achieved on some substrates for:

precious metals
cadmium
barrel nickel plating
copper, nickel and hexavalent chromium for decorative rack plating
hexavalent decorative chromium
hexavalent hard chromium
etching copper from PCBs.

The type of system installed will depend on the existing infrastructure, and plant as well as the
process type.

Economics
See Overall applicability, Section 4.7.10. These will be site-specifc.
Capital and running costs of the techniques may be offset by increased recovery of process
chemicals, which can be >95 %. Also, these techniques can reduce running costs and/or
investment in a waste water treatment plant. Extra steps cause a loss in process line capacity (an
increase in the number of cycles).

Planning calculations can be assisted by software tools, see Section 4.1.4 and Annex 8.11.

Driving forces for implementation
See Overall economics, Section 4.7.10.
Reduced costs.

Example plants
See individual techniques, Section 4.7.10.1 to Sections 4.7.10.4 and 4.7.11.5, and Reference
Plants K and L, Annexes 8.5.8 and 8.5.9).
Bodycote, Uxbridge, UK (formally West Middlesex Plating)
Merrydale, Wednesbury, UK

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003], [18, Tempany, 2002, 48, France, 2003, 49, France, 2003, 55,
France, 2003, 113, Austria, 2003, 162, USEPA, 2000]
Chapter 4
256 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.7.11.1 Addition of an eco rinse tank

Description
The operation of an eco tank is described in Section 4.7.4. This alone can recover 50 % of drag-
out; and can assist in achieving rates of above 50 %. The total rate can be calculated when 50 %
of the values in Table 4.8 are taken, for instance, triple static rinse in barrel plating:

Rc
R
total = 50 % + 0.5(40) % = 70 %,

equivalent to an increase of 75 % and a reduction of rinse-water by >20 %.

Achieved environmental benefits
May be considered where other alternatives are not achievable or as part of several rinses steps.

Cross-media effects
See Section 4.7.4

Operational data
See Section 4.7.4. Requires additional process line space as well as an additional process station
programming into automatic lines.

Applicability
Adding an eco rinse tank requires additional space on the process line
Can also be used for minimising chemical usage for metal plating baths, where the
concentration of metal and other ions must be increased by salts to maintain a certain level. For
some processes, pre-dip can cause problems, see Section 4.7.4

Economics
See Overall economics Section 4.7.1.

Driving force for implementation
See Overall economics Section 4.7.1.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [113, Austria, 2003]

4.7.11.2 Evaporation using surplus internal energy

Description
Evaporation is atmospheric and achieved here by using the surplus heat energy in the process
generated because of the poor electrical efficiency of the solution. The amount of energy
necessary for evaporating corresponds roughly to the energy which is released in the process
tank as heat energy thus the system is energetically self-sufficient. The rate of evaporation can
be increased by using air agitation, or an evaporator (see 4.4.4.2). In this case, the process
solution is pumped through the evaporator where it meets an air stream blown through the
evaporator to the atmosphere. The evaporator chamber is usually filled with packing material to
increase the water evaporation surface. Heated evaporators are described below in Section
4.7.11.3

Evaporation from the process can be due to:

an elevated processing temperature, such as >80 C for electroless nickel and >55 C
for electrolytic nickel and phosphating at >90 C (see Figure 4.16)
cooling of the process solution by evaporation to maintain a constant processing
temperature, such as in cyanide zinc barrel plating at <25 C, bright chromium at 40 C
and hard chromium at 60 C.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 257
The evaporation of 1 litre of water requires approximately 1.4 kWh.

0
5
10
15
20
25
30
40 50 60 70 80 90
Temperature of process solution C
E
v
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
k
g
/
m

h
Figure 4.16: Specific water evaporation from process solutions, with fume extraction at the process tank

The evaporation losses in operating parameters in the previous example can be calculated as
follows:

Jig plating

surface area of plating solution 6 m
water evaporation at 60 5.5 litres/mh
water evaporation 33 litres/h.

Barrel plating

plating energy/barrel 2.5 kWh
plating energy total 25 kWh
water evaporation equivalent 35 litres/h.

An example calculation is given in Annex 8.11 for zinc barrel plating and examples are shown
in Annex 8.5.

Equivalent quantities of rinse-water with diluted process solution can be added back into the
process tank. The recovery rate is directly related to the concentration of process chemicals in
rinse-water, and this again depends on the chosen rinse technique. A choice of appropriate
technique is outlined below.

Even if there is no significant evaporation, a technique for drag-out recovery is shown in
Section 4.7.4.
Achieved environmental benefits
Higher recovery of drag-out.
Can be part of closing the loop for specific process steps.

Cross-media effects
Reduction in the need for cooling systems.

Possible aggressive fume formation at higher operating temperatures in some processes.
Extraction of the vapours from the process is part of the evaporation. The extracted air may
need scrubbing. Scrubbing liquors may be treated in a typical waste water treatment plant.
Decomposition products are concentrated, so additional solution maintenance is required

Chapter 4
258 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Operational data
Evaporation is most readily used with process solutions working at elevated temperatures, in
particular chromium electrolytes. In connection with multistage rinsing technology (in practice
up to five rinsing stages), the procedure can be operated almost waste water free. Sufficient
evaporation can occur at an ambient temperature. In hexavalent chromium plating, chromic acid
dragged out from the process bath into the rinses is virtually completely recovered to the
solution. Minimum chromium acid losses are to be expected through the exhaust air and with
the regeneration of the electrolytes.

Evaporation can be increased by using air agitation and/or an evaporator to increase the surface
area (see Sections 2.7.4, 2.7.5 and 4.7.11.3).

Applicability
All process solutions, particularly those with poor electrical efficiency where the process
solution heats and is often cooled by evaporation (see Section 4.4.4.2). Hexavalent chromium
electrolytes are particularly suitable for this technique.

May also be used with chemical solutions with a high heat of reaction.
Regional weather patterns may also affect applicability.

Economics
Requires little or no capital installation.

Driving force for implementation
See Overall economics, see Section 4.7.10.

Example plants
See reference plants in Annex 8.5

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003], [124, Germany, 2003] [113, Austria, 2003].

4.7.11.3 Evaporation using additional energy with an evaporator

Description
In electrochemical installations, atmospheric evaporators are used for the concentration of
rinsing water, which are fed back into the process tank. Industrially used evaporators usually
work at temperatures between 20 and 200 C and at operating pressures between 0.1 and 1 bar.
Usually the evaporators used in electroplating shops are equipped with energy recovery
(vacuum evaporators with vapour consolidating or heat pump) and need approximately 150
200 kWh per cubic metre of evaporated water.

The principles of (natural process) evaporation (see Section 4.7.11.2) and evaporators are
approximately the same, yet the evaporator is more universally applicable in practice, since its
performance is adjustable independently of the process conditions, (see Sections 2.7.4 and
2.7.5)

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 259
Activated bath
Rinse 1 Rinse 2 Rinse 3
Evaporator
Distillate (recovered rinse water)
Concentrate
Water Drag in
Evaporation
Rinse-recovery
Drag-out
Figure 4.17: Schematic diagram of the evaporator

Achieved environmental benefits
See Overall achieved environmental benefits, see Section 4.7.10.

Cross-media effects
Additional energy in the order of 150 200 kWh/m
3
of water may be used in evaporators, either
as heat input and/or reducing pressure.

To prevent contaminated water droplets being emitted to the air, the evaporation tank can be
equipped with a mist eliminator at the outlet side. The performance of the evaporation tank
depends on the air temperature and humidity, and there are likely to be significant regional
variations

Operational data
With the evaporation of diluted electrolytes at normal boiling temperature of the water, organic
additives of the electrolytes can be destroyed. Vacuum evaporator systems have therefore been
developed which work at much lower pressures and low temperatures. Due to high demands on
the materials in such systems, they are more expensive than simpler systems.

Applicability
All process solutions that are heat stable.

Although not dependent on surplus energy in the process bath (see Section 4.7.11.2), the
process will work most effectively with hot solutions, or those with poor electrical efficiency
where the process solution heats and is often cooled by evaporation (see Section 4.4.4.2)

Regional weather patterns may also affect applicability.

To ensure appropriate investment all process chemicals contained in the process solution must
be tested for their application in an evaporation system before introduction of the technique.

In addition to the evaporation of chromium electrolytes, evaporators are also used for
concentration of rinsing waters from the acid or cyanide zinc, nickel and cadmium
electroplating. With zinc solutions, there is a tendency for the electrolytes to form foam which
requires additional treatment.

Evaporators are increasingly used for electrolyte feedback from rinsing waters. The complete
closing of material cycles with an evaporator enabling the complete feed back of rinse-water for
certain process stages is achievable.
Chapter 4
260 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Economics
See Overall economics, Section 4.7.10.

There is a capital cost for installation of the evaporator (with or without vacuum), usually with a
storage tank. There are additional energy costs, although these may be marginal with hot
solutions. Cost savings come from recovered materials, reduced use of effluent treatment
materials and in some cases, reduced capital investment in a waste water treatment plant.

The economics for the recovery of materials and the reduction of water usage, vs. the cost of
increasing the number of rinse tanks in a rinsing stage, amendments to plant, etc. can be
calculated using the data in this section (with specific plant data). It can also be calculated using
software tools for plant optimisation, see Section 4.1.4 and Annex 8.11 for examples for rinsing
after cleaning, after pickling, after electrocleaning, after plating and in conjunction with forced
evaporation, as well as after passivation.

Driving force for implementation
See Overall economics, Section 4.7.10

Example plants
Frost Electroplating Ltd, Birmingham, UK; Merrydale, Wednesbury, UK, Sikel N.V. Genk,
Belgium, Disflex France (Breuil le sec), TMN (Notre Dame de Gravenchon), France,
ACRODUR (Carrire sur Seine), France (see Section 4.7.11.6).

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003], [119, Eurofer, 2003], [124, Germany, 2003], [124,
Germany, 2003], [119, Eurofer, 2003, Czech, 2003 #116].

4.7.11.4 Electrodialysis

Description
The electrical dialysis is a diaphragm procedure, in which an electrical field forces material
transport. Anions and cations are removed from solutions with an applied electric field in cells
with alternating anion- and cation-permeable membranes. It is used both for the concentration of
diluted solutions and for the demineralisation of water.

Note: M
+
= cation, A
-
= anion
Figure 4.18: Operational principle of the electrical dialysis
[104, UBA, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 261
Achieved environmental benefits
Reduced water consumption.
Increased drag-out recovery.

Cross-media effects
Requires energy inputs.

Operational data
To achieve long service life of the diaphragms:

the diaphragms must be protected by a pre-filtration stage against mechanical pollution
the blocking of the diaphragms by organic materials (such as oils) must be prevented
blocking at the diaphragm surface can be avoided by regular rinsing and polarity
reversal (pole changes).

Applicability
Has been used in surface treatment to recover nickel salts from rinse-water.

Economics
Criteria for an economic application of electrical dialysis are the service lifetimes of the
diaphragms, the efficiency of the plant in separating components and the yield per kWh.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003], [113, Austria, 2003, 162, USEPA, 2000]

4.7.11.5 Reverse osmosis closed loop electroplating

Description
Reverse osmosis (RO) uses a hydrostatic pressure gradient across a semi-permeable membrane
to separate water from a solution of salts. The pressure applied exceeds the osmotic pressure of
the feed solution causing water to flow from the concentrated solution to the more dilute
solution: the reverse of the natural osmotic diffusion. Dissolved solids are rejected by the
membrane surface. Many multi-charged ions can be rejected at rates exceeding 99 %. Single-
charged ions typically have rejection rates in the range of 90 - 96 %.

Figure 4.19: Reverse osmosis plant
Menoni S.A. and Agence de leau Seine-Normandie
Chapter 4
262 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Achieved environmental benefits
Used to concentrate rinse-waters and recover materials, treat waste waters and incoming or
recycled water.

Cross-media effects
Energy required for maintaining pressure.

Operational data
Reverse osmosis is used in the surface finishing industry for purifying rinse-water and for
recovery of chemicals from rinse-waters. It has also been used to purify raw water for the
generation of high-quality deionised water in rinsing and plating solutions. Figure 4.19 presents
a reverse osmosis flow schematic for rinse-water applications. Reverse osmosis applications
involving the separation of plating chemical drag-out from rinse-water have been applied
mainly to nickel plating operations (sulphamate, fluoborate, Watts and bright nickel). Other
common applications include copper (acid and cyanide) and acid zinc. Recently, RO has been
applied successfully to chromate rinse-water. In the typical configuration, the RO unit is
operated in a loop with the first rinse following plating. The concentrate stream is recycled to
the plating bath and the permeate stream is recycled to the final rinse. Reverse osmosis is
commonly used for water treatment(with and without ion exchange) applications requiring
production of high-quality water from high total dissolved solids (TDS) sources. Large scale
waste water recycling is evolving as an important application for RO in the surface finishing
industry.

Membrane performance of all polymer-based membranes decreases over time and permeate
flow (flux) and membrane rejection performance are reduced. RO membranes are susceptible to
fouling by organics, water hardness, and suspended solids in the feed stream or materials that
precipitate during processing. Installing prefilters can control solids in the feed stream.
Changing operational parameters, such as pH, inhibits precipitation. Oxidising chemicals like
peroxide, chlorine and chromic acid can also damage polymer membranes. Acid and alkaline
solutions with concentrations greater than 0.025 molar can also deteriorate membranes. In most
applications, the feed solution will have significant osmotic pressure that must be overcome by
the hydrostatic pressure. This pressure requirement limits the practical application of this
technology to solutions with total dissolved solids concentrations below approximately 5000
ppm (with the exception of disc tube applications). Specific ionic levels in the concentrate must
be kept below the solubility product points to prevent precipitation and fouling. Ionic species
differ with respect to rejection percentage. Some ions such as borates exhibit relatively poor
rejection rates for conventional membranes.

Applicability
See Operational data, above.

Economics
See Example plant, below. Payback can be short (see Example Plants, BGT Eindhoven)

Driving force for implementation
Materials recovery, water recovery, reduced investment and running costs in a typical waste
water treatment plant

Example plants
BGT Eindhoven, Netherlands
Disflex France, Breuil le Sec, France.

The following data are for: Disflex France
Nickel is deposited on a flexible support before decorative chromium plating.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 263
Water from the first cascade rinsing is recovered. This water is rich in nickel because of the
drag-out, and is passed through activated carbon and it is sent to a buffer tank. The solution is
pumped at 20 bars pressure through the membranes of the reverse osmosis unit. The recovered
nickel solution is returned to the treatment bath and the water is reintroduced in the first stage of
the cascade rinsings.

The process conditions are:

nickel bath temperature: 60 C
nickel bath volume: 6000 l
nickel bath concentration: 80 g/l
five cascade rinsing tanks, volume: five tanks at 400 litres
buffer tank volume (after activated carbon and before reverse osmosis):300 litres

Nickel concentration of the different cascade rinsings to judge the system efficiency:

nickel bath = 80g/l
rinse 1 Ni = 6.3 g/l
rinse 2 Ni = 1.6 g/l
rinse 3 Ni = 0.54 g/l
rinse 4 Ni = 0.250 g/l (250 mg/l)
rinse 5 Ni = 0.065 g/l (65mg/l).

The size of the reverse osmosis unit is not large and comprises two blocks of membranes each
one metre long.

Benefits
Recovery of nickel solution, both metal and other additives.
Reduced waste water treatment costs.
Reduced water consumption.

Economics
For this example:

o electric consumption of the pump: 2.5 kWh
o membrane maintenance costs (change and cleaning): EUR 2000 for 3 years
o monitoring of the system (in time and manpower), levels control and filters
cleaning:
o 1 hour each day
o cost of a reverse osmosis unit: EUR 30 000.

Other driving forces for implementation
There is no loss of nickel to solid waste or water. All the nickel bought is deposited, so there is
100 % efficiency.

Better quality of the products because rinsing is more effective.

Reference literature
[55, France, 2003, 162, USEPA, 2000, 166, RIZA, 2004]

Chapter 4
264 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.7.11.6 Electrolytic chromium plating - closed loop electroplating

Description
Hexavalent Cr(VI) plating can be operated as closed loop for chromium. This is achieved by a
combination of cascade rinsing and an evaporator to ensure that the rinsing water is in
equilibrium with the evaporation.

Ion exchange is used to remove accumulated impurities.

Achieved environmental benefits
There are no discharges of Cr (VI) or other materials from the process to waste water. This
minimises the capital cost of treatment and the use of chemicals and energy in treatment.

Chromic acid and other components (such as foam suppressants, e.g. PFOS) are recycled in the
process.

Cross-media effects
The baths of hexavalent Cr(VI) plating are polluted by inorganic cations from the treated metals
and the reduction of the chromic acid. These impurities must be maintained at low concentration
in order not to disturb the chromium plating operation.

Energy is used to assist in evaporation

Operational data
The plating bath is followed by reversed cascade rinsing. The rinsing water is treated on cationic
resin (to retain Cr(III) and other cations) and then concentrated on an evaporator to get a
concentrate rich in chromic acid. This acid is sent back to the working bath. The distillate is
recycled in the rinsing step.

The evaporator reduces the rinsings until a concentration of 250 280 g/l is obtained, or an
intermediate concentration (120 g/l), which can be returned to the plating solution, where the
natural evaporation of the bath contributing to the concentration.

There is an efficiency optimum which is a compromise between the necessary consumption of
electricity for the evaporation and the consumption of used water for the rinsing refeeding.

The equipment size depends on the pollution drag-out quantity. The evaporation flows are
between generally 60 and 200 l/h.

Ions exchangers collects the metal cations on the rinsings before evaporation. The regeneration
of the ions exchangers is carried out in an hazardous waste treatment centre.

There is the possible problem of corrosion, depending on the alloy quality of the evaporator.

Applicability
All Cr (VI) plating plants.

Economics
Capital cost will be site dependant on existing plant and drivers, such as the need to reduce
Cr(VI) discharges, increase waste water treatment plant capacity, etc. There are higher
maintenance and energy costs.

Driving force for implementation

Example plants
Disflex France (Breuil le sec), TMN (Notre Dame de Gravenchon), ACRODUR (Carrire sur
Seine)

Reference literature
[48, France, 2003]
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 265
4.7.12 Combining techniques and installation-wide approaches

General Description
Techniques can be used in combination more widely within the installation to achieve the
overall environmental objectives for the installation (see 4.1.1 (a) and (b)).

The preceding sections (4.4.5.3, 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7) describe point source techniques based on one
process or process line to:

reduce water consumption by recovering and re-using water
reduce materials consumption by recovery and re-use.

These and other techniques can be used to further the objectives above for the whole installation
as well as to minimise waste waters and waste water treatment. However, this needs an overall
view taking into account, for example:

the details of the objectives
the existing equipment (including infrastructure such as existing waste water treatment
plant), existing or planned changes in process
the condition/suitability of the equipment for the current or planned tasks
pressures for change, such as meeting environmental quality standards
costs, including point in the depreciation curve for existing equipment.

There are trade-offs between the point source options and centralised or combined systems for
purification/recovery. For example, a single fixed location recovery systems (e.g., centralized
reverse osmosis/ion exchange for recycling rinse-waters from several process lines). Another
combined strategy would be to use a mobile system to perform intermittent
purification/recovery of several point sources. For example, a single mobile diffusion dialysis
system might be used to purify/recycle several different acid baths. Combined strategies may be
more cost-effective, due to economy of scale, unless there are substantially increased plant
interface requirements: for example, a typical waste water treatment plant is based on
combining all the flows (see Sections 2.13.1 and 4.16). Point source systems, in part or
completely, may offer more flexibility, redundancy, reliability and may be more cost-effective.
In some cases, techniques can be combined to achieve zero, or close to zero, discharge (see
Section 4.16.12).

Examples of combining techniques
There are several techniques that can be used to enable water to be re-used in processes and/or
for the final cleaning of waste waters to meet low emission requirements, see Annexes 8.5 and
8.11.

Description
The final cleaning of waste waters by using chelating cation exchange resin is more efficient
when carried out after effective metal removal. This can be by prevention and retention of raw
materials (for example, see Sections 4.6 and 4.7), electrolytes (see Section 4.11.9) and/or
precipitation (see Section 4.16.7). The efficiency of chelating cation exchange resin depends
also on the effluent pH. The optimum pH is different for each metal. [121, France, 2003].

The removal of the metal (for example, with electrolysis,) may be most easily achieved at the
rinsing stages (see Figure 4.20 Section 4.7), where it most concentrated and prior to mixing with
any other contaminants. High efficiency electrolytic cells increase the lifetime of the exchange
resin.

A combination of electrolysis and fluid bed technologies can be used on their own or in
combination with semi-permeable membranes and ion-exchange technologies for the recovery
of metals from polluted aqueous solutions, see Section 4.12.1(some of these are proprietary and
patented).
Chapter 4
266 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Rinse supply
To effluent treatment
Counter rinses
(70 - 90 % Water usage reduction)
Static rinse
Electrolysis cell
Transfer Pump
Recirculating tank
(Maintained at approx 1%
of process solution concentration)
Figure 4.20: Removal of metal lost in rinsing prior to ion exchange
Chemelec cell, BEWT Environmental Services Ltd.

Achieved environmental benefits
Achieving low levels of metal discharged.
Potential to re-use rinse-waters.

Ion exchange systems require space, not only for the resin columns but also for the regeneration
plant. They also require sufficient expertise to control the regeneration and the produced water
quality. For small installations, commercial systems operate where the resin columns are
exchanged with a supplier who regenerates the resins at a central facility.

Cross-media effects
Power consumption, especially at low concentrations, unless a high efficiency cell is used.

Operational data
See Section

Applicability
Wide applicability on precious and non-precious metals.

Economics
There are several parameters that can have a significant effect on the capital cost but the central
ones are the sustained flow through the ion-exchange and the level of metal contamination.
Introducing metal recovery in the process line can remove 95 % of the metal transferred to the
ion exchange resulting in a 2000 % increase in the time before the resin needs to be refreshed
(or alternatively the amount of resin and therefore the size and cost of the equipment can be
reduced significantly):

nominal capacity:
o <1 m
3
/hr at 100 ppm GBP 25000 (June 2003)
o <3 m3/hr at 100 ppm GBP 47000

Effluent treatment: The standalone units, which require minimal civil engineering works to
install (i.e. pipe runs and level hard-standing) are modular in design and cater for a range of
continuous flow of effluent from 0.5 to 9.0 cubic metres/hour of rinse solution. Capital costs
vary dependant upon the number of stages of treatment prior to the final settlement tank and the
level of process monitoring that has to be included and the method of off-site discharge.
Operating costs are almost totally dependent upon the cost of the chemicals (acid, alkali,
flocculent etc.) required for pretreatment.

nominal capacity:
o <0.5 m3/hr GBP 11000
o <3 m3/hr GBP 23000
o <9 m3/hr GBP 38000
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 267
Driving force for implementation
Water protection policy and legislation.

Example plants
For cadmium recovery and water re-use:

South West Metal Finishing Ltd, Exeter, UK
Moores (Wallisdown) Ltd., Bournemouth, UK.

For effluent treatment:

C-TEC Ltd., Leighton Buzzard, UK
Ekkato Ltd. (Aluminium Thrakis), 19 300 Athens, Greece.

Deioniser exchange is used by over 1500 installations in Germany.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003, 110, BEWT, 2003], [12, PARCOM, 1992].

4.7.13 Zero discharge
In some cases techniques can be combined to the achieve zero discharges to water, See Section
4.16.12.

4.8 Other techniques to optimise raw material usage

4.8.1 Control of concentration of process chemicals

Description
Process solutions become increasingly ineffective when the working concentration of certain
process chemicals drops below specification. By topping up of the consumed process chemicals
the service lifetime of a solution can be extended, see Section 4.1.2. SPC controls are often used
and/or other production management systems A key problem remains that some production
operators tendency to add more material than is necessary.

Where possible, automated dosing is the best option for accuracy and reliability, and allows
regular additions and avoids swings in concentration. This may be actuated on a time,
temperature, flowrate, or other control basis, such as pH or rH, etc.
Existing processes can be optimised by suppliers and/or in-house expertise to reduce the
concentration of chemicals, particularly those with significant environmental or health effects.

There are two cases to differentiate between:

Metals: the balance of the metal ions in electroplating is theoretically constant between
the amount dissolved from the anode and the amount deposited at the cathode, but this
is not true in practice, see Section 4.8.2. In the electroless deposition of a metal or with
the use of inert anodes, the metal ions must be replaced in the solution according to
their deposition rate and their drag-out.

Process chemicals: the concentration of other remaining chemicals in the process
solution, such as acids, alkalis, salts, gloss additives/brighteners or buffer substances is
reduced automatically by drag out of electrolyte or by degradation in the process.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of service life of solutions.

Reduction in over-use of chemicals through uncontrolled additions.
Chapter 4
268 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Cross-media effects
None

Operational data
Measurement of key process solution components at preset intervals is necessary to monitor
consumption, breakdown rates and additions made.
The consumption of the individual ingredients of the process solutions does not happen
uniformly. Selected ingredients which are subject to a higher consumption need to be topped up
separately. The selected dosage of components can be problematic where the individual material
components are not known to the operator and not always available on the market. Chemical
suppliers can assist with advising on control parameters and provide concentrates for topping
up. The top up may have to be based on empirical investigations (operational experience) and
can often only be automated with difficulty.

Applicability
All process solutions. The top-up of process chemicals to the original composition is general
process technology and in practice found everywhere

Economics
Extends working life of most process solutions.
Improved process quality and consistency.

Driving force for implementation
See Economics, above. This is frequently required by customers.

Example plants
All sites visited; for example, SGI, Plaisir, France; Sikel N.V. Genk, Belgium; Corus, Llanelli,
UK.

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 269
4.8.2 Different electrode yields

Description
The simple concept of electrolytic metal deposition is that the concentration of the metal ions in
the solution remains constant because the metal anode dissolves at the same rate as deposition.
However, in reality, there are frequently different electrode efficiencies at the anode and
cathode. A higher anodic yield leads to an increase of the metal ion concentration. This can be
found with certain electrolytes, such as nickel and zinc solutions.

There are options for dealing with this problem, which may be used alone or together. Problems
are discussed under Applicability, below:

where solution electrochemistry allows, use insoluble anodes with external dissolution
of the metal and controlled solution strength (see introduction to Chapter 2, Electrolytic
cells and reactions)
replace some of the soluble anodes by membrane anodes with an extra current circuit
special insoluble anodes that allow the concentration of the solution to balanced
run workpieces or substrates requiring higher thickness coatings
plating out on steel sheet
removing anodes.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimisation of energy usage and waste of process metal in drag-over.
Reduction of plating over the required specification thickness.
Reduction in environmental effects from reworking due to problems with over-plating.

Cross-media effects
Additional equipment is required where external dissolution tanks are used, or membrane
circuits and/or separately controlled additional circuits.

Operational data
All techniques may improve process control, but see Applicability. Use of external make-up
tanks or process additions requires increased process quality control and maintenance.

Applicability
Many electrolytic processes, including zinc, can utilise insoluble electrodes and use external
make-up tanks, or separate solution additions. An inert anode system with external make up
requires additional investment but addresses the problem consistently over time.

Running workpieces or substrates requiring higher thickness coatings and plating out on steel
sheet, only works with soluble anodes. Current efficiency may then become too high. The
right balance of specifications for workpieces (i.e. combination of thicker and thinner coating
thickness requirements) may not coincide with the need to remove excess dissolved metal,
especially for jobbing shops.

Removing anodes: the anodic current density must be considered. This can lead to anode
passivation and/or increased electrolytic decomposition of process solution constituents. The
reduced current density reduces throughput and takes more time to reduce the process solution
metal concentration.

Plating out does not recover anode metal. However, electrolytic selective plating using low
current densities can be used to remove unwanted contaminating metals, for example from
nickel baths with soluble Ni anodes.

In practice, nickel processes cannot utilise insoluble electrodes (see Section 2.5.2)

Chapter 4
270 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Membrane anodes are breakable, and it may not be possible to use this technique in sub-contract
plating, where the shapes and sizes of parts to be plated vary continuously (and may make
contact with and break membranes). Membrane anodes are also limited by current density.

Economics
Investment in an inert anode system with external make-up or using membrane anodes with a
separate circuit is usually self-financing through materials saving and improved process quality.
Other options are cheaper in the short term, but lack long-term consistency and savings, and if
relied on regularly, may give more quality problems (and hence cost) than they resolve.

Driving force for implementation
Process economics.
Process uniformity over time and reduction in reworking.

Example plants
Metal Colours, Slough, UK.; SIKEL N.V. Genk, Belgium.

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002](verbal discussions with TWG members) [60, Hemsley, 2003, 73, BSTSA,
]. [119, Eurofer, 2003] [73, BSTSA, ], [113, Austria, 2003, 165, Tempany, 2004]

4.8.3 Switching the polarisation of the electrodes in the electrolytic
processes

Description
The polarisation of electrodes in electrolytic degreasing and in electrolytic pickling processes is
switched at regular time intervals.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of raw material consumption as the plating efficiency is higher.

Cross-media effects
None.

Applicability
New and existing coil coating plants with bipolar electrodes.
For jig and barrel plants, the solutions become contaminated by the substrate metals and would
require two tanks.
Where the substrate is suitable, e.g. hydrogen production may occur.

Economics
For coil coating, the initial investment is EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t to EUR >0.8/t installed, with
maintenance costs of EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency and product quality.

Example plants
Many continuous coil electroplating lines.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 271
4.9 Substitution choice of raw materials and processes

General description
Surface treatment uses a wide range of chemicals in a wide range of processes. Section 1.4.4.
Annex IV of the Directive requires the use of less hazardous substances to be considered [1, EC,
1996] and it is also a PARCOM recommendation. However, there may be other environmental
benefits to be gained, either in conjunction with using less harmful substances, or for the other
gains in their own right, e.g.:

lower materials usage, both in process, in waste water and air emission treatment
energy saving
water saving

There are also other operational and economic reasons for substitution, e.g.:

improved quality and reliability of the process
costs savings for decreased waste water treatment
cost savings for reducing air extraction an treatment
health and safety in the workplace.

Substitution can be achieved by:

substitution directly of one substance by a less harmful one. An example is the
replacement of EDTA or NTA with derivatives of gluconic acid. There are limited
opportunities for this in surface treatment
substitution by different process chemistries or methods. This is used where there is no
direct replacement, for example, replacement of zinc cyanide by cyanide-free alkali or
zinc acid solutions. Different coating process chemistries give treatments with different
properties, even for the same materials
substitution by different surface treatments, such as substituting autocatalytic nickel or
vapour deposition of chromium for hard chromium plating. If the substitution is for the
core treatment, the final properties may be different.

Some key issues are discussed as substances, e.g. hexavalent chromium, and options include
substitution of chemicals and processes. Others issues are discussed as process types, such as
degreasing.

Overall achieved environmental benefits
Reduction in the use of harmful substances and the amounts subsequently entering the
environment.
Other improvements in environmental performance, such as energy saving, production of less
waste, emission of less noise or dust, etc.

Overall cross-media effects
These effects depend on the individual alternative technique. Some may have effects such as
increased energy usage (vapour deposition techniques), increased waste production (acid zinc)
or increased water or raw material consumption.

Failure to meet specific requirements (see Overall applicability, below) will lead to increased
rejects and reworking, with consequent environmental impacts (see Section 4.1.2).

Overall operational data
See individual examples from Sections 4.9.1 to 4.9.16.

Chapter 4
272 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Overall applicability
In all cases, it is essential to discuss the changes with the customer in advance of making the
substitution. It is good practice not to make changes without full knowledge of the final
performance characteristics required. Failure to meet these characteristics, particularly without
warning, can lead to loss of customer confidence and increased rejects. To ensure processes
operate to the required standard, it is advisable for both operator and customer to monitor
quality and performance to, and exchange information on, the required specification (see
Section 4.1.2).

Economics
This will be on a case by case basis. In some cases, there will be economic incentives from
energy saving, etc.

Driving force for implementation
Health and safety of employees is a major driver for substituting less harmful substances, e.g.
substituting for hexavalent chromium.

Other environmental legislation, such water legislation driven by OPSAR and PARCOM
recommendations, the Water Framework, Seveso II, and Solvent Emissions Directives.
Substitutes may be more cost effective.

Example plants
SGI, Plaisir, France; Sikel N.V., Genk, Belgium.

Reference literature
[11, Tempany, 2002, 18, Tempany, 2002](verbal discussions with TWG members industry at
site meetings)[60, Hemsley, 2003] [12, PARCOM, 1992] [124, Germany, 2003]

4.9.1 Substitution for EDTA and other strong complexing agents
(chelating agents)

Description
The problems of strong chelating agents particularly EDTA are described in Section 1.4.4.5.
They are widely used in process solutions such as degreasing and etchants used for printed
circuit board manufacture. They may be replaced by weaker and biodegradable ones, such as
those based on gluconic acid. There are alternatives used in pickling and cleaning in Germany.
EDTA is also used to some extent in electroless copper in PCB manufacturing. However, there
are many alternatives to substitute EDTA, including so-called direct plating methods (for
example tartrate-complex in copper solution), see Section 2.11.2.4.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction in solubilisation of metals in waste water treatment systems and in environment
systems.

Cross-media effects
Substituting or reducing the amount of EDTA released reduces the energy and chemicals
required for destruction.

Operational data
EDTA can also be destroyed or eliminated, see Section 4.16.8

Applicability
Printed circuit board manufacture: specifications for the latest technology may require the return
to using EDTA.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 12, PARCOM, 1992, 22, Fraunhofer, 2002] [124, Germany, 2003] [120,
Finland, 2003]
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 273
4.9.2 Substitution for, and reduction of, toxic surfactants (NPE and
PFOS)

Description
There are two families of problem materials that are toxic and bio-accumulative:

NPE and nonylphenol are OSPAR chemicals for priority action and are banned for
metal working, with effect from 17 January 2005, except for uses in controlled systems
where the washing liquid is recycled or incinerated
PFOS (Perfluorooctane sulphonate) is widely used as a foam suppressant and surfactant,
especially in preventing the formation of mists in hexavalent chromium electroplating
and alkali non-cyanide baths. However, it is now under investigation (see Annex 8.2)
and the OECD Task Force on Existing Chemicals has already agreed that it is
persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic.

No substitutes for NPE have been reported.

Substitutes are available and in use for anodising.
There are currently no substitutes for PFOS in Cr(VI) plating and pickling because of its strong
resistance to oxidation. PFOS is also used in alkali cyanide-free zinc processes to reduce spray,
as well as zonc alloy plating, some anodising and strong acid gold processes.

Achieved environmental benefits
Substitution by less harmful substances, or alternative processes will reduce the environmental
and health effects.

Cross-media effects
PFOS has important health and safety functions in controlling the spray from harmful solutions.
Increased extraction of Cr(VI) and other air pollutants due to cessation of use may require
additional scrubbing and treatment.

Operational data
In situations where PFOS has been used, such as Cr(VI) plating, other measures may be taken to
prevent Cr(VI) mist reaching MAC levels in the workplace, such as use of floating insulation
(see Section 4.4.3), lids on tanks and/or redesigned and/or upgraded ventilation (see Section
4.18.2), substitution by a less harmful process (see the appropriate parts of this section), etc.

If PFOS has to be used, then it is best practice to use it in a closed loop process. Cr(VI) plating
can be run on this basis.

Other processes can be run with drag-out reduction and rinsing techniques to conserve PFOS in
the process tanks, see Sections 4.6 and 4.7

Applicability
Cr(VI) plating can be run on a closed loop system. Other processes can utilise drag-out and
rinsing techniques to minimise the release of PFOS. Its use can also be minimised by
controlling the addition of PFOS (or solutions containing PFOS) using surface tension
measurements.

Originally, it was reported that no PFOS is used in France, but other reports suggest it is in use.

Economics
Cost of additional air extraction or control equipment.
Control measures, such as surface tension measurements, are minimal.
Drag-out measures also retain other materials.

Chapter 4
274 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Driving force for implementation
Occupational health legislation. For NPE, a ban is now in place

Example plants

Reference literature
[73, BSTSA, ] [30, EC, 2003] [109, DEFRA, 2004, 165, Tempany, 2004]

4.9.3 Substitution for cyanide overview

Overall description
Cyanide has been widely used in many electrolytic processes such as zinc, copper, cadmium,
silver and gold plating. It is also extensively used in other surface treatment processes, such as
degreasing processes and nickel stripping.

Processes with alternatives to cyanide are discussed in Sections 4.9.4 and 4.9.5.

Overall achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of use and emission of cyanide.
Reduction of AOX: AOX may be generated through chemical oxidation of cyanide in waste
water treatment with sodium hypochlorite and chlorine.
Cyanide electrochemical baths have low current efficiency compared with acid zinc (70 - 85 %
efficient), see Section 2.5.4.

The plating baths for cyanide-free plating of copper on iron and steel have a phosphonate
complexing agent, which can only be removed by precipitation with lime. This leads to more
waste produced when compared to cyanide plating.

Cyanide-free copper also needs twice the current than cyanide copper because of the two
oxidation states of cyanide-free processes.

Overall cross-media effects
See specific applications for data on each application.

Overall operational data
Free cyanide is easy to manage and treat.

See specific applications for data on each application.

Applicability
There is no single chemical substitute for cyanide.

There is no successful substitute (chemical or process) for cyanide in the treatment of substrates
such as zinc die-cast, magnesium die-cast and others. Zinc die-cast products are widely used in
bathroom fittings, furniture, automotive and telecommunication products. A stable working
substitute process is not known for serial, high volume production lines.

Other factors affecting substitution for cyanide are:

poorer degreasing ability of cyanide-free electrolytic degreasing electrolyte (cyanide
solutions have inherently good cleaning properties and are tolerant of indifferent pre-
cleaning)
increased maintenance and skill level required for alternative processes (bath control,
bath analysis, etc.)
modification of the coating characteristics.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 275
Economics
There may be increased costs with running non-cyanide systems. However, these may be offset
by reduced effluent treatment.

Driving force for implementation
Decreased health and safety risk.
Public perception of the use of cyanide.
Improved compliance with environmental quality standards.
Decrease in the risk of environmental accidents.

Example plants
Metal Colours Ltd, Slough, UK; SIKEL N.V. Genk, Belgium.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 18, Tempany, 2002, 124, Germany, 2003] [113, Austria, 2003]

4.9.4 Zinc electroplating

Zinc electroplating has been one of the major uses for cyanide in the sector.

4.9.4.1 Alkaline cyanide zinc

Description
See Section 2.5.4.

Achieved environmental benefits
Cyanide can be readily oxidised in waste water treatment plants

Cross-media effects
Requires waste water treatment.
May require fume extraction.
Poor process efficiency of 50 % power input, decreasing with current density.

Operational data
Does not require high standard degreasing because of self-cleaning capability
Easy to operate and maintain.
Has a lower consumption of brighteners Requires more space.
Highly suitable for barrel plating. Achieves guaranteed layer thickness on jig and barrel
processing and has good throwing power into holes and blind spaces

Applicability
Ductile deposit with good throwing power.

Reference literature
[114, Belgium, 2003, 124, Germany, 2003].

4.9.4.2 Alkaline cyanide-free zinc

Description
See Section 2.5.4.

Achieved environmental benefits
No cyanide used.
Reduced waste water treatment requirements.

Chapter 4
276 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Cross-media effects
With higher voltage because of insoluble anodes and poor current efficiency of 50 70 %
decreasing with increasing current density, the process is at least twice as energy intensive as
other Zn processes. With potassium electrolytes, the current efficiency can be increased to
70 %. 70 85 % is achievable at 2 A/m
2
for well managed processes. See Section 2.5.4.

With poor current efficiency, more (possibly twice) the process capacity is needed compared
with acid zinc systems.

Alkaline zinc needs more air extraction than the other Zn processes. It can be optimised by
using wetting agents, which provide a foam covering to the bath. A further option is to cover the
tank where the zinc is chemically dissolved externally to the solution, although the foam
suppressant may contain PFOS (see Section 4.9.2 and Annex 8.2).

Operational data
Needs to be preceded by high quality degreasing systems.
Needs skilled process control and management.
Dispersion of coating thickness is better than cyanide processes.

Applicability
Better metal distribution than cyanide processes.

Driving force for implementation
See Section 4.9.3, Overall driving forces for implementation.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 18, Tempany, 2002, 124, Germany, 2003] [113, Austria, 2003] [129, Spain,
2003, CETS, 2003 #115]
4.9.4.3 Acid zinc

Description
See Section 2.5.4.

Achieved environmental benefits
High current efficiency, approaching 95 %.
No cyanide used.
Reduced waste water treatment requirements.
No special requirement for fume extraction.

Cross-media effects
Increased sludge production, from dissolution of some of steel substrates and with soluble
anodes.

May require fume extraction for acid mists, but not necessary for chloride-based solutions.
However, extraction is advisable.

Operational data
Needs to be preceded by high quality degreasing systems.
Needs skilled process control and management.
Soluble and insoluble anodes can be used instead of only soluble ones, giving better quality
control, see Section 4.8.2

Applicability
The metal distribution is poor to acceptable, increasing with warm electrolytes.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 277
Economics
Large savings in power consumption.

Driving force for implementation
See Section 4.9.3, Overall driving forces for implementation.

Example plants
Metal Colours Ltd, Slough, UK; Sikel N.V. Genk, Belgium.

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002] [119, Eurofer, 2003]

4.9.4.4 Zinc alloys

Zinc alloys are widely used and well-established, but no data has been provided on their use as
substitutes for zinc processes.
Chapter 4
278 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.9.5 Other cyanide - based solutions

More detail is given on these in the relevant sections in Chapter 2.

Chapter 2
description
Process or chemical Chapter 4
Reference
2.3 Workpiece or substrate preparation
Cyanide degreasing
Thought to be obsolete [112, Assogalvanica,
2003]
2.5 Core activities - plating
2.5.1 Copper and copper alloy plating
Copper cyanide
Acid copper
Pyrophosphate copper
Brass
Bronze
Copper cyanide is necessary for strike plating on
steel and zinc die casts, and some barrel plating.
Acid copper is the solution of choice in Germany.
Pyrophosphate copper has limited applications.
No alternatives to cyanide solutions for brass and
bronze are reported.
2.5.4 Zinc and zinc alloy plating
Alkali cyanide zinc
Alkali cyanide free zinc
Acid zinc
Zinc alloys
See Section 4.9.4.
2.5.5
Cadmium plating
Electrolytes may be based on cyanide, fluoroborate, sulphate or chloride
For most other applications acceptable alternatives have been developed. Acid zinc
plating lowers the risk for hydrogen embrittlement and tin can replace cadmium for
giving a low and constant friction coefficient on fasteners. Mechanical zinc plating and
zinc/aluminium flake coatings can also be viable alternatives for protecting high
strength steels. [115, CETS, 2003]
2.5.7 Precious metal plating
Silver
Gold

Table 4.9 Process solutions using cyanide

4.9.6 Substitution for, and minimisation of, hexavalent chromium

Introduction
Hexavalent chromium chemicals, such as chromic acid, are frequently used in surface finishing.
The main applications are:

decorative chromium plating
hard chromium plating
chromic acid anodising
chromate conversion coatings.

See Annex 8.1 for details of chromium and its compounds in relevant legislation and
agreements. Hexavalent chromium has been classified as carcinogenic by inhalation, and
regulations apply to its use in processes. It is a priority substance for the US EPA to minimise
use and release [148, HTMLA, 2003] [108, NEWMOA, 2003], as well as restrictions on the use
of hexavalent chromium products [144, EC, 1976]. Chromium trioxide is being reviewed by the
EU and is likely to be raised in status from toxic to very toxic. This may trigger the lower
threshold requirements of the Seveso II Directive where over five tonnes are used [142, EC,
1996].

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 279
The health and environmental issues associated with hexavalent chromium are described in
Section 1.4.4.1. In addition, only chromate films containing hexavalent chromium may release
Cr(VI) during the handling and the usage of the finished product. There are no contact problems
with metallic chromium on finished workpieces from any process (hexavalent or a trivalent)
[124, Germany, 2003].

Any zinc-plated part is usually post-treated with a suitable chromate conversion process as well
as many substrates (such as die-castings). The colour of the finishes of existing hexavalent
chromium conversion processes and the level of their corrosion protection is directly in relation
to their thickness and to their hexavalent chromium content.

Because of these environmental and health and safety concerns, European directives limit the
amount of hexavalent chromium left in the product in the automotive, electrical and electronic
industries [96, EC, 2003, 98, EC, 2003, 99, EC, 2000]. This is the driving force for innovative
hexavalent chromium-free technologies. Various EU R&D projects are nearing conclusions on
Cr(VI) management, [28, DG-RTD, 2002].

4.9.7 Minimisation of release of hexavalent chromium from treated
surfaces

Description
Topcoatings for chromium passivation systems are described in Section 2.5.17. or they can be
provided by powder coating or any other topcoat From Table 4.10, it can be seen that an
application of a suitable topcoating layer on the chromate conversion coating is sufficient to
dramatically reduce release of chromium VI.

The chromium VI release is also a function of the quality and amount of the rinsing following
the post-treatment: rinses have to be designed to avoid any residue of the chromate conversion
solution remain adsorbed on the surface of the treated parts. However, the corrosion protection
of the more intense colours (yellow to black) can be severely diminished by excessive leaching
from rinsing.

Table 4.10 shows the releases of Cr(VI) from different coloured passivations, based on several
statistical industrial determinations.
Electroplated coating Chromate conversion coating
Finish colour process type
Cr(VI) release
Zinc and zinc alloys [124,
Germany, 2003]
Clear-blue Cr(VI) 0.05 0.1 g/cm
2
Clear-blue Cr(III) 0.0 g/cm
2
Yellow-Tropical Cr(VI) 0.3 0.6 g/cm
2
Green Cr(VI) 0.7 0.9 g/cm
2
Black Cr(VI) 0.7 1.0 g/cm
2
Yellow-Tropical Cr(VI)

Followed by a topcoat layer
0.1 0.2 g/cm
2
Black Cr(VI)

Followed by a topcoat layer
0.02 0.1 g/cm
2
Table 4.10: Release of chromium (VI) from treated substrate

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduced hexavalent chromium releases in subsequent handling and use.

Driving force for implementation
Increasing health and safety concerns for the use of Cr(VI) and various directives limiting its
use.
Chapter 4
280 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Example plants

Reference literature
[124, Germany, 2003] [96, EC, 2003, 98, EC, 2003, 99, EC, 2000] [3, CETS, 2002] [118,
ESTAL, 2003].

4.9.8 Chromium electroplating techniques

There are several options commercially available. Hexavalent chromium is the most widely
used, but concern about its toxicity and use are increasing. The most widely-used alternative is
trivalent chromium. There has been a significant information exchange and validation of this
issue by the technical working group The comments [146, ZVO, 2003, CETS, 2004 #147] and
discussion are in Annex 8.10.

4.9.8.1 Hexavalent chromium plating

Description
See Section 2.5.3.

Achieved environmental benefits
Waste water s can be treated in a typical waste water treatment plant.
Because of poor current efficiency and the need to cool the solution, it can be run as a closed
loop system, using multistage cascade rinsing and evaporation.

Cross-media effects
Very toxic to health in the workplace and the environment (see Section 4.9.6).
Treatment requires additional hazardous chemicals.
High solution concentrations have high viscosity and drag-out levels.
Air extraction requires scrubbing to remove the aerosol of Cr(VI).
High waste production from lead anodes.
Cr(VI) compounds are strong oxidising agents and it is advisable to store them separately. Dried
Cr(VI) electrolytes have been known to cause fires

Operational data
Poor electrical efficiency caused by hydrogen evolution at the cathode (up to 85 - 90 % of
power consumption) and the solution requires cooling.
Hydrogen evolution causes a mist of Cr(VI) which, with handling of the solution and
components, creates high profile workplace occupational health problems.
Mist suppression additives can be used, but these are based on PFOS, which has health and
environmental risks (see Section 4.9.2).
Poor metal distribution and sensitivity to ripples in the power supply cause relatively high reject
rates.
Self-passivation of unplated areas assists corrosion resistance.

Applicability
Widely applied in nearly 3000 installations worldwide.
Hard or functional chromium for engineering purposes can only be applied by this technique
(but for an emerging alternative technique, see Section 6.2).

Economics
Solution costs are cheap.
High energy costs for power consumption, higher reject rates and waste water treatment plant
costs.
Increasing insurance costs to cover heath and safety of workforce have been reported.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 281
Driving force for implementation
Only large scale techniques for hard chromium plating, and some higher specification
decorative finishes. Self-passivating in unplated areas.

Example plants
Widely applied in nearly 3000 installations worldwide.
Closed loop operation (with preceding closed loop nickel and copper) in Merrydale Industries
Ltd, Wednesbury, UK.

Reference literature
[108, NEWMOA, 2003, 147, CETS, 2004] [125, Ireland, 2003, 147, CETS, 2004]

4.9.8.2 Cold chromium hexavalent process

Description
A new technique using cold chromium has been put into production in 2000 in an Italian plant.
The temperature of the processing bath with Cr(VI) is kept at about 18 19 C by a
refrigeration system (instead of 25 30 C). At this temperature, the concentration of Cr(VI) in
the process solution may be reduced by about 50 %. The quality of plating is the same.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimisation of hexavalent chromium released.
Minimisation of evaporation of process solution evaporation.
Less energy used in the process.
Reduction of exposure to workers.
Reduction of water consumption.
Less waste water treatment required and less sludge produced.

Cross-media effects
Additional energy required for refrigeration. It is not clear how this compares with the energy
savings in the process.

Operational data
Less concentrated solutions require a longer time for processing.
Better quality because of better throwing power.
No white edges.

Applicability
The technique may only be suitable for application in a new plant.

Driving forces for implementation
As introduction to Section 4.9.

Example plants
Industria Galvanica Dalla Torre Ermanno e Figli SpA, Fontane di Villorba, Italy.

Reference literature
[112, Assogalvanica, 2003]

Chapter 4
282 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.9.8.3 Trivalent chromium chloride-based electroplating process

Description
See Section 2.5.3

Achieved environmental benefits
The plating bath runs at a concentration of 20 g/l instead of 200 to 450g/l for hexavalent
chromium. Reduced solution viscosity means less chromium dragged-out, and a reduction of
chromium released: Cr(VI) is not released. Solutions can be chloride- or sulphate-based.

In three case studies, the following were found:

reduced or no hexavalent chromium compounds to store, handle or were in use
in conjunction with electrolytic removal of chromium (as hydroxide), waste water
treatment sludge reduced from 20 tonnes per year to 2 tonnes per year in one case, and
there was thirty times less sludge in another
about 30 % reduced power consumption
no chemicals required for metals reduction
no surfactants required to prevent mist formation
the plating baths can be recovered using porous pots, membrane electrolysis or ion
exchange
air pollution treatment requirements reduced.

Lower health and environmental problems for Cr(III), reflected in TA-Luft values of 1 mg/m
for Cr(III) to 0.05 mg/m for Cr(VI).

Cross-media effects
Problems have been reported in waste water treatment plant caused by complexing agents used
in Cr (III) solutions. However, these have not been confirmed on site visits or in the case
studies.

Operational data
The colour of the Cr(VI) deposit is described as blue-bright, the chloride trivalent deposit
varyingly as grey-bright, yellow-bright or dark-bright. These historic problems with colour
differences to deposits from hexavalent chromium and variations during processing compared
with hexavalent chromium have largely been overcome by new solutions. These colour
problems, and poor solution reliability and life, have long been overcome: it is crucial to use
carbon filtration and ion exchange, or proprietary solution treatment processes, as well as
minimising carry-over from previous processes.

Trivalent chromium solutions containing chloride can theoretically produce chlorine at the
anode and hence AOX in the solutions, which could be dragged-out. In practice this has been
controlled for 20 years by the addition of proprietary chemicals.

Requires training of staff and increased process control, which is similar to that required for
bright nickel, which is used for the preceding layers.

Thicknesses can be measured by the same equipment (e.g. Couloscope, X-ray diffraction).

Higher current efficiency means higher loading of racks and 15 % increase in throughput has
been reported.

Lower current density requires lighter, less expensive racks and wiring.

Reject rate reduced from 5 - 10 % to 0.5 % due to Cr(III)s better throwing power, higher
current capacity and less susceptibility to ripples in supply, reducing rough deposits (i.e.
burning in high current density areas) and reduced whitewashing from plating interruption.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 283
Applicability
It cannot replace hard chromium plating.

It cannot replace certain corrosion resistance applications, such as where the CASS requirement
is greater than 16 h. Trivalent chromium does not passivate unplated surfaces. Lower corrosion
resistance has been reported, which is likely to be due to areas of no or low nickel thickness.
Where hollow or recessed components (such as tubes) are plated, care is needed to prevent
corrosion post-plating. This includes rapid and thorough rinsing of the acid bath, and possibly
followed by passivation in a proprietary organic solution (validation from industry practitioners
internationally) or a light Cr(VI) passivation (this mitigates some of the advantages of a Cr(VI)-
free system).

The colour is a slightly yellow hue when compared directly to parts plated by hexavalent
chromium. Cases have been reported of this being a problem to specific customers.

Colour and corrosion resistance has been accepted in major retail uses, such as cookers, on
components subject to high temperatures and abrasive cleaners with strong caustic and acid
components.

This has successfully been used with no loss of customer confidence (see Section 4.1.2).

Economics
One-off costs include disposal of old hexavalent chromium solution, replacing lead vat lining
with PVDF and replacing lead/antimony anodes with carbon. An ion exchange system is
required for controlling metal contamination, and the resin requires changing at approximately
three year intervals. The base chemicals are more expensive.

These are more than offset by:

a 30 %saving in energy
a reduction in solid waste produced and disposed of
reduced effluent treatment costs (no Cr(VI) to reduce)
reduced air monitoring
reduced staff medical monitoring
reduced reject rate
a significantly reduced risk of employee ill health.

One case study reports an overall gross profit improvement of USD 182 per shift of 670 m
2
from a jig plating line (1995 costs).

Driving force for implementation
Reduced risk to employee health. Reduces health and safety requirements, as well as
expenditure on aerosol suppression, air extraction, monitoring for hexavalent chromium in the
workplace atmosphere, as well as medical monitoring of staff. Cost-effective overall.

Example plants
Townrow (Hi-Tech Plating) Ltd, Sheffield, UK (case study), Foss Plating, Santa Fe Springs,
California.

Reference literature
[43, SEA, 2001] [108, NEWMOA, 2003, 115, CETS, 2003, 148, HTMLA, 2003]

Chapter 4
284 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.9.8.4 Trivalent chromium sulphate electroplating process

Description
For decorative nickel-chromium process. The process is carried out using sulphate electrolyte
with Cr (metal) concentration between 6 and 8 g/l.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduced Cr concentration when compared with trivalent chromium chloride (up to 20 g/l) and
with hexavalent chromium (up to 450 g/l) processes.

No complexing agents (unlike chloride process) that may give rise to problems in the waste
water treatment plant.

In addition to the environmental benefits achieved with chromium chloride solutions this
process is more safe because there is no production of chlorine at the anode.

The solution is less aggressive and last longer. The problem of iron dissolution in the inner,
hollow parts of workpieces is dramatically reduced.

Reduced drag-out thanks to the low viscosity of the solution.

Cross-media effects
No data available.

Operational data
Special insoluble anodes are used. They last much longer than graphite anodes used for trivalent
chromium chloride solution (chlorine corrodes graphite anodes).

The bath is operated at 55 C. Evaporation reduces the level of solution in the vat and therefore
the addition of recovered solution is made possible. When slowly withdrawn workpieces are
rather dry and drag-out is reduced.

The colour difference to hexavalent chromium coating is further reduced when compared with
the colour of coatings deposited from chloride solution.

Throwing power is excellent: it increases the overall resistance to corrosion and in particular of
those places usually never reached even by Cr(VI) coating and where rust will first crop out. In
addition, no burning like patch forms when the intensity of current is high.

Applicability
The technique may apply to new and existing plants.

Economics
No data available.
The components of the solution are very expensive when compared with those of Cr(VI). These
costs are only partially offset by the lower costs of waste water treatment and the smaller
amount of sludge produced. However, other costs are also lower (see Cr(III) chloride case
studies).

Driving forces for implementation
As for chromium (III) chloride process, see Section 4.9.8.3.

Example plants
Industria Galvanica Dalla Torre Ermanno e Figli SpA, Fontane di Villorba, Italy. About 12
more lines in Italy.

Reference literature
[161, Assogalvanica, 2004]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 285
4.9.9 Chromium free processes other coating processes

Options are given in Table 4.11, below.

Other hard chromium plating substitutes such as nickel-tungsten-silicon carbide composite are
still in the research phase. For specific applications, an alternative could be an electroless nickel
coating [3, CETS, 2002]. Nickel - tungsten is only used in brush plating in applications [113,
Austria, 2003].

Hard chromium can be replaced in some applications by alloyed WC-Ni(Co)Cr/Cr
2
O
3
, or by
high velocity oxy-fuel spraying or plasma spraying [121, France, 2003].

Chapter 4
286 Version May 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_Final_Draft
Possible Non-chromiumreplacement Comments
Nickel-tungsten-boron
Uses conventional plating equipment and operates similarly to a conventional nickel plating bath;
may be more costly than Cr(VI)
Nickel-tungsten-silicon-carbide
May provide higher plating rates and higher cathode current efficiencies; may provide better
throwing power and better wear resistance; may be more costly than Cr(VI)
Tin-nickel
Good corrosion resistance in strong acids, breaks down above 320 C, less wear resistance than
Cr(VI)
Nickel-iron-cobalt
Vendor claims twice the wear resistance and 2.6 times the corrosion resistance of hex chrome;
same colour can be obtained
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
p
l
a
t
e
d

n
i
c
k
e
l

Nickel-tungsten-cobalt
Contains no chloride or strong chelators; can be used in rack and barrel plating; good corrosion
resistance except in marine environments; may tarnish; contains ammonia
Tin-cobalt
Three commercial options reported, with different attributes:
plate on nickel; decorative only
plate on decorative nickel and nickel alloy; may be used in racking; mildly alkaline
good colour, light blue cast; no ammonia; no fluorides; no chlorides
N
o
n
-
n
i
c
k
e
l

e
l
e
c
t
r
o
p
l
a
t
e

Cobalt phosphorous
Nano-crystalline deposit produces extreme hardness; plating current waveform modification
(electrically mediated deposition) used to produce nano-crystalline deposit.
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
e
s
s

Electroless nickel:
-nickel-tungsten
-nickel-boron
-nickel-diamond composite
-nickel-phosphorous
-nickel-polytetrafluoroethylene
Possibly less hardness and abrasion resistance than Cr(VI); no build up on corners
HVOF (high velocity oxygenated fuel)
thermal sprays
Hardness and wear resistance similar to Cr(VI); limited to line-of-sight applications.
Physical vapour deposition (PVD)
-titanium nitride
Greater hardness than Cr(VI) with a thinner coating; less corrosion resistance
Ion beam-assisted PVD Line-of-sight; thinner coatings give same properties as other thicker coatings
Plasma spray
-titanium carbide
Aluminium, steel, carbon steel, titanium substrates
Chemical vapour deposition Vacuum deposition; not limited to line-of-sight; resistant to acids; high deposition rate
Ion implantation Ions are implanted no thickness; non-line-of-sight
Powder coating
Vacuum metallisation (PVD) has met OEM wheel industry testing requirements including ASTM
B117, GM4472P, GM9508P, GM9682P, and GM6
O
t
h
e
r

m
e
t
h
o
d
s

Laser cladding Non-line-of-sight; nickel carbide coating
Table 4.11: Summary of non-chromiumsubstitutes for hard and decorative chromiumbaths
North East Waste Management Officers Association, US [108, NEWMOA, 2003]Tin cobalt alloy electroplating
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 287
Description
A chromeless technique using Sn/Co alloy (Co 5 10 %) has been tested and run in production
lines for several years in Italian installations and in the Netherlands. This technique has a high
penetration capacity (it can plate more complex shapes than hexavalent chromium) and provides
top quality finishing. The finishing colour may be slightly darker than that obtained with
Cr(VI).

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimisation of hexavalent chromium.
Treatment of rinsing water is easy and effective.

Cross-media effects
Some tin-cobalt baths contain chelating amines which cause problems with waste water
treatment. However, this does not apply to all solutions.

Operational data
The bath is rather unstable, a strict control of the operative conditions is required, in particular
the pH.
A passivation stage with light Cr(VI) may be needed.
Barrels need to be made of acrylic.

Applicability
It has been approved for certain automotive interior parts since the 1990s by General Motors.
It does not have high wear resistance.
Economics
No data available

Driving forces for implementation
As introduction to Section 4.9.

Example plants
Cromotrevigiana Srl, Ponzano Veneto, Italy. Industria Galvanica Dalla Torre Ermanno e Figli
SpA, Fontane di Villorba, Italy. Brandsma Metaalveredeling B.V., Hilversum The Netherlands.

Reference literature
[112, Assogalvanica, 2003] [165, Tempany, 2004] (Personal communication, Hank de Man,
Brandsma Metaalveredeling BV.)

4.9.10 Chromium conversion coatings

The processes are widely used and described in Section 2.5.17. Due to the driving force of the
ELV and ROHS Directives [98, EC, 2003, 99, EC, 2000], a large amount of work is being
undertaken worldwide to develop alternatives to Cr(VI). Improvements and options are steadily
being reported. Some reports indicate the future lies with alternative substrates, or alternative
coating systems, such as replacing zinc plating with zinc alloys [149, PPT, 2004, 150, Rowan,
2003].

Phosphochromating exists with both hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and trivalent chromium
(Cr(III)) versions and is used in the treatment of aluminium prior to painting [90, EIPPCB, ]
[118, ESTAL, 2003].

Chapter 4
288 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.9.10.1 Hexavalent chromium

Description
A widely used technique, often in conjunction with zinc plating, as discussed in Section 2.5.17.

Used in passivating copper, brass and bronze in preference to bright dipping, as fewer fumes are
evolved. It is also used for magnesium and its alloys.

It is widely used prior to power coating, although low Cr(VI) solutions are available, as well as
the alternatives described in Sections 4.9.10.2 and 4.9.10.3

Achieved environmental benefits
Low Cr(VI) solutions reduce negative impacts.
Cr(VI) solutions run at lower concentrations and lower temperatures than some of the
alternatives.

Cr(VI) can readily be reduced and precipitated in a typical waste water treatment plant.

Operational data
Easy to use.

Applicability

Economics
Very cheap.

Driving force for implementation
Cost, ease of use and corrosion resistance.

4.9.10.2 Trivalent chromium conversion processes

Description
Trivalent chromium passivation is described in Section 2.5.17. The protection mechanism of the
trivalent chromium conversion coatings is not yet fully understood. Their behaviour seems to
indicate that the protection is mainly due to the physical barrier of the coating itself, since the
coating is not sensible to any subsequent thermal shock. As can be seen from Table 4.10, there
is no release of trivalent chromium from workpieces where it is used.

In some cases at least, the action of the Cr(III) is catalysed or assisted by other metals, such as
cobalt

Certain Cr(III)-based conversion coatings have a higher performance and can match normal
Cr(VI) conversion coatings when used with alloy plating and/or with additional coatings, see
Sections 2.5.11, 2.5.17 and for emerging techniques, Section 6.3.

Achieved environmental benefits
No hexavalent chromium use and releases.

Cross-media effects
May involve the use and release of other metals such as cobalt.
Runs at ten times the concentration of Cr(VI) conversion layers, requiring more attention to
minimisation of drag-out and possibly more waste water treatment.
Requires heated solutions with more energy input.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 289
Applicability
The corrosion protection achievable with these processes is currently limited to the protection
level provided by the equivalent clear blue and yellow iridescent finishes achieved with
hexavalent chromium. Although trivalent chromium can now exceed the equivalent hexavalent
chromium performance for these colours, they are not capable of replacing brown, olive drab
and black finishes. Their corrosion resistance is extended to match or exceed Cr(VI)
performance by using additional coatings, see Section 2.5.11 and Section 2.5.17.

Economics
Savings in reduced effluent treatment costs, and health and safety management including
scrubbing any extracted air.

Driving force for implementation
The ELV and ROHS Directives.
Also reduces health and safety requirements, as well as expenditure on aerosol suppression, air
extraction and monitoring for hexavalent chromium in the workplace atmosphere.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] (Personal communication, Berthold Sessler, CETS) [98, EC, 2003, 99, EC,
2000].
4.9.10.3 Chromium-free conversion processes

Description
Chromium-free processes are based on treatments with a composite organic-zirconium fluoride
solution, treatments with titanium fluoride, or treatments with organic silicon derivatives
(silanes). They may require a subsequent polymer layer, such as electrophoretic lacquer, to
achieve required corrosion resistance, see Section 2.5.11..
There are black dyeing methods, which must be supplemented by sealing or topcoats for
appearance and anticorrosion

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimisation of hexavalent chromium released.

Cross-media effects
MSDS-based alternatives may be as toxic as Cr(VI).

Applicability
Chromium-free solutions on the market are not yet fully able to provide zinc corrosion
protection equivalent to chromate conversion coatings. These new processes still have some
limitations with regard to the level of corrosion protection and the required bonding capability
with any subsequent polymeric layer applied for functional and/or decorative purposes. There
are chrome-free solutions, comparable to chrome conversion coating solutions, for aluminium

Driving force for implementation
As for Section 4.9.6.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [76, BSTSA, , 104, UBA, 2003] (Personal communication, Johannes Lusser,
ESTAL) [152, ESTAL, 2004] Technical specifications for aluminium surface treatment:
QUALICOAT.

Chapter 4
290 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.9.11 Chromic acid anodising

Description
See Section 2.5.13.

Applicability
Used largely prior to powder coating but also in aerospace, electronics and other specialist
applications, as residues cause no corrosion with aluminium or alloy substrates.

Reference literature
[90, EIPPCB, ]

4.9.12 Phosphochromating (phosphating with chromium)

Description
Sealers and phosphochromate finishes can contain hexavalent chromium. Phospho-cromating
processes for aluminium produce layers containing trivalent chrome and phosphates. Many of
these can be replaced with non-CrVI systems. Examples systems based on are silanes,
zirconium and titanium.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimisation of Cr(VI) and hence discharges to air and water.

Cross-media effects
Some of the alternatives may be as toxic as Cr(VI) (according to the materials safety data
sheets).

Driving force for implementation
Occupational health, ELV and REE Directives.

Reference literature
[71, BSTSA, , ESTAL, 2004 #152] [98, EC, 2003, 99, EC, 2000]

4.9.13 Substitution for mechanical polishing and buffing

Description
Acid copper plating has an excellent levelling capability. It can sometimes be used to replace
polishing and buffing processes.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction or elimination of dust and noise from mechanical processes.

Cross-media effects
Increased waste water treatment requirements.

Operational data
Specification of the basic roughness and the necessary layer thickness are not given.

Applicability
Suitable for workpieces prior to decorative nickel and copper plating.

Economics
Investment in polishing and buffing is replaced by investment in acid copper processing.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 291
Driving force for implementation
Simplified health and safety requirements.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 113, Austria, 2003].

4.9.14 Substitution and choices for degreasing

4.9.14.1 Mechanical pre-cleaning - centrifuging

Description
Excessive oil and grease can be removed mechanically, i.e. by centrifuging or by air knife (see
Section 2.3.5 for alternatives) before other forms of degreasing, such as chemical or solvent,.
Achieved environmental benefits
Extends the life of degreasing solutions. Savings in chemicals and other inputs for degreasing.
Reduction in wastes produced.

Cross-media effects
Power consumption in centrifuging and other mechanical techniques.

Operational data
The majority of oil deposits on small components can be removed by centrifugal force,
providing the components can withstand the mechanical load without distortion, e.g. screws,
bolts, nuts and nails. In most cases, removed oil can be recycled after filtering. Cleaning is often
improved by warming the components to decrease the viscosity of the oil.

Workpieces can be destroyed or surfaces for decorative finishing damaged.

Applicability
The majority of small oiled components, usually undergoing barrel treatment.
Energy used for heating components prior to centrifuging.

Driving force for implementation
Reduced subsequent degreasing treatment, reducing degreasing chemicals, power consumption,
and improving quality.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002]
4.9.14.2 Solvent degreasing

Description
See Section 2.3.3.

Achieved environmental benefits
Low heat consumption.

Cross-media effects
Because of the classification of certain CHCs as potentially carcinogenic materials, their water-
endangering potential and problems with emissions to the air and their use is strongly regulated
(see Driving forces for implementation, below). Alternative solvents are inflammable.

Chapter 4
292 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The use and control of this technique may be discussed in the BREF on the Surface Treatment
using Solvents.

Operational data
Good cleaning efficiency, quick drying.

Applicability
Almost universally applicable, see Section 2.3.3

Driving force for implementation
Used for high specification work, e.g. some aerospace or military applications.
Used where water-based treatments can damage the surface being treated.

Example plants
Have been widely used.

Reference literature
[90, EIPPCB, ] [12, PARCOM, 1992, 93, EC, 2000, 96, EC, 2003, 97, EC, 1999]
[165, Tempany, 2004]

4.9.14.3 Chemical aqueous (soak) degreasing

Description
This section refers to cyanide-free aqueous degreasing, see Section 2.3. Cleaners can be of
varying pH strengths and surfactant types and concentrations, according to the input oil/grease
load, the substrate being treated and the requirements of the subsequent processes.

Achieved environmental benefits
The acids and alkalis used are simple and easy to treat in typical waste water treatment plants,
unless strong chelating agents are present (see EDTA, Section 4.9.1 and waste water treatment,
Section 4.16.8).

Cross-media effects
Process tanks operate at 40 - 90 C and may require fume extraction to remove water vapour
and alkaline or acid fumes.

Metals can be stripped from the substrate surface, (including trace elements such as lead, in
some steels. They can be separated after pH adjustment.

Used acid or alkali solutions are often treated separately as they create a large pH change which
may not be accommodated by continuous flow waste water treatment plants.

The surfactants present are not usually eliminated by a typical waste water treatment plant.
Cleaning solutions may need to be separated from other process effluents to avoid interference
with the waste water treatment plant by excess surfactants.

Maintenance can extend bath lives, see Section 4.11.13

Operational data
Short process solution life, depending on the throughput and the amount of oil and grease
removed.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 293
Applicability
Water-based degreasing systems offer well proven alternatives to solvent-based systems in
almost all cases.

Cleaning processes for zinc and aluminium must be at or near neutral pH.

Emulsifying degreasing solutions have better degreasing efficiency, but are more difficult to
regenerate than unstable emulsion (weak emulsion) systems. Applicability may need to be
determined in each case.

Driving force for implementation
Health and safety, replacing solvents in the workplace.

Example plants
Worldwide usage.

Reference literature
[IHOBE, 1997 #6; UBA, 2003 #104, CETS, 2002 #3[124, Germany, 2003]

4.9.14.4 Weak emulsion degreasing

Description
This is a variation of chemical aqueous degreasing, using a more easily maintained solution.
Surface-active agents used in weak emulsion degreasing solutions are developed chemically so
they do not form a stable emulsion with the removed oils and greases. The degreasing tanks are
drained to a holding tank (usually for a group of degreasing tanks) for the removal of floating
oils and sediments. Weak emulsion cleaning solution separates by itself, so that simple
mechanical systems (skimmers) can be used for the removal of the oil. By the continuous
removal of contamination via the holding tank and feedback of the cleaned degreasing solutions
in the bath, a high service lifetime is achieved.

Weak emulsion degreasing systems offers thereby a compromise between the two requirements
for degreasing systems:

a smaller (but still sufficiently high) oil-absorbing capacity than strongly emulsifying
degreasing baths;
they can be substantially more easily regenerated and re-used.

The type of systems to be used can be derived from these characteristics.

Chapter 4
294 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Oil
Degreasing vat
Holding
tank
Band
skimmer
Figure 4.21: Weak emulsion degreasing system with holding tank for cleaning
[104, UBA, 2003]

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimisation of chemical and power consumption in cleaning.

Cross-media effects
Small additional power consumption required for pumping and oil recovery.

Operational data
The advantage of a weak emulsion system is that the solution is constantly being refreshed by
having the oil removed.

Weak emulsion degreasing can leave grease/oil films on the panels of barrels - especially from
the first bath. This film can be carried through all the vats in the plant. The grease/oil films from
cleaners with weak emulsions can block ion-exchanger resins and membranes for membrane
processes if these are used for recirculating rinses in the plant. These effects do not exist with
stable emulsions

Applicability
Numerous cases are known in practice, where the conversion to a weak emulsion degreasing
systems has given satisfactory cleaning.
Workpieces with strongly adhering pollution or with very viscous oils or grease on the surface
cannot be cleaned by weak emulsion systems.
Strongly emulsifying systems have better degreasing capabilities, but are more difficult to
regenerate. It is advisable to determine applicability on a case by case basis.

Economics
The investment in this type of plant may be high particularly if taken in conjunction with the
maintenance options in Sections 4.11.13. A complex investment is only likely to be cost-
effective if the process line and the amounts of oil and grease involved are large.

Driving force for implementation
Improved down-stream process control.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003], [118, ESTAL, 2003], [113, Austria, 2003].

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 295
4.9.14.5 Biological degreasing

Although often referred to as a substitute technique, this is a maintenance technique for weak
alkali degreasing baths that overcome their short lifetime by constant bypass regeneration. It is
described in full in Section 4.11.13.4

4.9.14.6 Dry ice

Description
See Section 2.3.5.3

Achieved environmental benefits
Removal of oil, grease and particles, paint, etc. without the use of solvents.
Dry waste containing only removed components.

Cross-media effects
Noise and energy to form and propel dry ice pellets.

Operational data
See Section 2.3.

Applicability
This method is used mainly for cleaning pressing forms and other special parts. In special cases
it is used to strip coatings (organic and metallic).

Driving force for implementation
Removal of paint without solvents and solvent emissions.

Reference literature
[116, Czech-Republic, 2003]; CETS, 2003 #115]

4.9.14.7 Ultrasonic cleaning

Description
Ultrasonic cleaning uses high frequency sound waves to improve the cleaning efficiency of
aqueous, semi-aqueous and solvent cleaners. By generating zones of high and low pressure in
the liquid, the sound waves create microscopic vacuum bubbles that implode when the sound
wave moves and the zone changes from negative to positive pressure: this is called cavitation. If
this occurs at the surface to be cleaned, the pressure cycles lead to local impacts, resulting in a
mechanical action at the surface. Theoretically, localised pressures of >1000 bar are generated,
dislodging grease and dirt.

Cleaning agents make this a viable process in aqueous solutions.

Achieved environmental benefits
More effective cleaning with less hazardous chemicals, when using aqueous solutions.

Cross-media effects
Waste water may include includes phosphates, surfactants, polishing paste and metals contained
in it (copper and zinc).
Causes high frequency noise, which may be above 85dB.
A power consumption of 10 W per litre is reported.
Solvent systems contain volatile organic solvents.

Chapter 4
296 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Operational data
Process advantages: the surface that needs to be clean is not attacked; good degreasing
efficiency and short operation time. Suitable for high specification cleaning.

Chemically efficient cleaners and higher temperature accelerate the process. Cleaners can be:

alkaline (pH 8 14) although >pH10 may attack some substrates such as aluminium,
zinc)
neutral (pH 7 9.5) are used to remove dirt
acid (pH 2 6). These remove oils and grease, although not as well as alkaline agents.
They are used for cleaning oxidised surfaces.

Organic solvents have good properties for removing pastes and have the advantage of drying
fast. They are expensive and more toxic than aqueous solutions.

The possible imbalance of the transducers can cause wave shock zones and dead zones, giving
uneven cleaning.

Parts may fall from jogs due to vibration.

Applicability
Widely applicable. Does not attack surfaces to be cleaned (such as copper, zinc).

Economics
Cost for installation in an automatic electroplating line with this system is approximately EUR
80000 (2004).

Driving force for implementation
Wide applicability and high quality of cleaning.

Example plants
At least two installations in Portugal.

Installation A: 250 litres, uses an aqueous degreasing bath without silicates and with neutral pH;
removes polishing paste:

working temperature: 60 C
bath duration: 1 week
ultrasound power: 1200 W.

Installation B:

bath working temperature: 55 - 60 C (heating by electrical means)
bath solution life: 90 days
consumption: 50 kg of chemicals/month
process disadvantages: cost of the equipment.

Reference literature
(Personal correspondence. S Gomes, Instituto do Ambiente, Portugal) [159, TWG, 2004]
See Annex 8.8

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 297
4.9.14.8 Electrolytic cleaning with pH control

Description
Electrolysis in a degreasing solution is used to remove grease and dirt prior to the coating
operation (see Sections 2.3.8 and 2.9.3.1). The degreasing solution is continuously monitored
using pH to measure its effectiveness and to control the addition of new solution.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimises the use of degreasing solution and the amount of waste solution requiring treatment.
Reduces the volume of waste water and sludge from the waste water treatment plant.

Cross-media effects
Production of an explosive mixture of gases (O
2
and H
2
).

Operational data
The process reduces the contamination of the plating solutions and contributes to less rejects of
the finished product.

Applicability
New and existing plants prior to the coating process sections.

Economics
Approximate costs for large scale coil installations are an initial investment of EUR >0.8/t along
with operating costs of EUR 0.015 - 0.8/t installed.

Driving force for implementation
Process quality and efficiency.

Example plants
Many coil coating plants.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.9.14.9 High performance degreasing systems

Description
For high quality cleaning, aqueous systems are used which can be supplemented by electrolytic
action. High quality cleaning is essential with modern process solutions such as acid zinc, etc.

In the case of strongly oiled parts, multistage degreasing can be advantageous. For the first
stage, a hot water pre-degreasing or an unstable emulsion cleaning solution is used (see Section
4.9.14.4). For a second stage, a more strongly emulsifying cleaning solution is used. Also the
combination of any two degreasing baths in sequence with the second, cleaner bath being used
to replenish or replace the first, dirtier bath extends the service life of the degreasing solutions
considerably.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of life of degreasing solutions. Reduction of reworking.

Cross-media effects
Energy consumption in higher temperature systems.

Economics
Case specific.
Chapter 4
298 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Driving force for implementation
Improved quality of workpieces or substrate for subsequent processing.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003]

4.9.15 Other degreasing techniques

Description
Many alternatives are mentioned in Section 2.3, such as:

air knives and rollers: for sheet metal, flat pressed components and wire, the majority of
oil can be removed by passing through a divider that can be mechanical (a wringer
roller) or an air knife
cyanide degreasing: thought to be obsolete
hot water: hot water (80 - 90 C) without chemicals can remove the majority of oil and
grease. This method is used mainly in the automotive industry when cleaning pressed
sheet steel. Using a high pressure water jet further improves the effect.
hand wiping: large and/or high value components can be cleaned manually with cloth or
paper wipers.

Some of these are newer techniques (e.g. air knives, dry ice) and are not widely used. Hand
wiping is for specific applications, e.g. for high value components.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extends the life of degreasing solutions.

Cross-media effects
Hand wiping can produce large amounts of wastes, such as paper wipers and solvents. In
addition, the use of solvents is poorly controlled.

Applicability
Depends on size and type of components: see Description, above.

Driving force for implementation

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 112, Assogalvanica, 2003] [90, EIPPCB, , 129, Spain, 2003]

4.9.16 Substitution by alternative processes

Description
The manufacturing industry is moving towards performance standards, such as corrosion
resistance achieved. This is being catalysed where the use of traditional coatings (such as zinc
and hexavalent chromium passivation) are being challenged by recent Directives being
implemented limiting the amount of hexavalent chromium in end-of-life products. This change
is challenging traditional specifications.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 299
To achieve modern high standards for corrosion prevention, multilayer systems are increasingly
used. This enables the operator to offer alternative systems to customers that achieve the same
performance criteria, and the potential to move away from more polluting processes. For
example:

electroless nickel for some hard chromium applications
zinc alloys in place of zinc and chromium passivation, in conjunction with organic
lacquers applied by dipping or electropainting
electropainting in conjunction with phosphating (see the Solvents BREFs [90, EIPPCB,
]).

Note: As an example, substitution has already been widely achieved for cadmium electroplating
as marketing and use regulations required many specifications to be changed to utilise
alternative surface treatments.

Alternative processes not in the scope of this document
Metals can be applied by physical methods, such as vapour phase deposition. They are not
within the scope of this document. However, an operator may wish to consider them as a clean
technology option, as set out in IPPC Directive, Annex IV. While such techniques are clean
technology at the point of use, they may produce some cross-media effects, such as higher
energy usage.

Examples of such techniques are:

vapour phase deposition of aluminium on plastic for automobile lighting reflectors
vapour phase deposition of chromium as a decorative finish, such as bathroom fittings.

Hard chromium can be replaced in some applications by alloyed WC-Ni(Co)Cr/Cr
2
O
3
, or by
high velocity oxy-fuel spraying or plasma spraying.

The US Defence Department is funding a study on alternatives for chromium conversion
coatings, and USEPA have also researched the replacement of chromate conversion coatings on
aluminium and zinc.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of toxic emissions.

Cross-media effects
To be investigated for each application.

Operational data
To be determined for each application.

Applicability
To be determined for each application.
May be limited by existing specifications.

Economics
To be determined for each application.
Overall, regulation of mass customer sectors will drive a shift away from traditional standards
for surface treatment.

Driving force for implementation
Health and safety and product regulations, such as automotive and electronics Directives.

Reference literature
[68, USEPA, 2003, 106, NCMS, 2003] [94, EC, 1999, 96, EC, 2003, 98, EC, 2003, 99, EC,
2000] [30, EC, 2003] [121, France, 2003] [106, NCMS, 2003] [66, PPRC, 2003, 68, USEPA,
2003]
Chapter 4
300 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.10 Common techniques for treating waters and aqueous
solutions: feed-water, rinses, waste water treatment,
process solutions, and materials recovery

Many techniques can be used with waters and aqueous solutions, to:

remove unwanted materials, such as:
o cleaning incoming water for rinsing
o recycling rinse-waters
o removing breakdown products or tramp metals in process solutions
o treating waste water prior to discharge
remove the water to concentrate the materials, such as to recover drag-out, recovery of
materials from waste waters

Table 4.12 lists the sections which discuss the application of treatment techniques.

Section Subject or techniques
4.4.5.1 Water supply, treatment and recycling/re-use
4.7 Rinsing techniques and drag-out recovery
4.7.8 Regeneration and re-use/recycling of rinsing waters
4.7.11 Increasing drag-out rate and closing the loop
4.7.12 Combining techniques and installation-wide approaches
4.11 Process solution maintenance
4.11.13 Maintenance of degreasing solution
4.11.14 Pickling
4.12 Recovery of process metals
4.16 Waste water emission abatement techniques
4.16.12 Zero discharge techniques
Table 4.12: Sections discussing the application of treatment techniques

A list of the current common techniques used singly or in combination to achieve a variety of
objectives is given in Table 4.13.

Table 4.14 in Section 4.11 lists common process solutions, their disturbing pollutants and their
treatment techniques.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 301
Technique
Applicability:
references to sections with examples of uses
(Key process descriptions are marked *)
Limitations Cross-media effects
Filtration
Widely used for:
incoming water supplies (4.4.5.1)
process solution maintenance (4.11.1*)
waste water treatment (4.16.10).
Limited to the removal of solids except when used in
conjunction with an absorption technique.
Generation of waste solids, used filter
media, etc.
Energy used in pumping.
Absorption
techniques
Activated carbon to remove organic breakdown products
form solutions (4.11.6*).
Granulated polypropylene felt, or other lypophilic media
are used to absorb oils in filter housings or as ropes, clothes
etc. used (4.11.13.2*).
Polymer filtration is used to selectively bind target metals.
Activated carbon can also indiscriminately remove
active organic additives.
Generation of waste solids, absorption
media, etc.
Energy used in pumping.
Crystallisation
Some etching or pickling baths with relatively high
concentrations where controlled metals removal and
recovery can be beneficial, e.g. copper from peroxide-
sulphuric acid solutions.
Removal of carbonates to maintain alkaline and cyanide
plating solutions (4.11.4*).
Also for acid pickling, and aluminium etchant (4.11.5*)
See Applicability. Energy used for cooling and pumping.
Atmospheric
evaporation:
natural and
assisted
(evaporators,
etc.)
Used to concentrate process solutions or rinses. (4.7.2,
4.7.11.2*, 4.7.11.3*)
In some cases, the distillate can be re-used in rinsing in the
process.
The distillate may trap spray from the process (such as in
Cr(VI) plating.
In some applications there is a risk of over-
concentration and fouling of the evaporator due to
salting out.
Surfactants can cause foaming problems
Some bath constituents may be heat degraded or
oxidised.
Aeration can cause build up of carbonates.
Recovery results vary depending on changing
process and air stream conditions.
When the feed streams and/or air
streams need to be heated, atmospheric
evaporators have a high energy use.
The discharged air may contain
hazardous substances.
If the distillate traps process spray and
is not returned to the solution, it may
require treatment.
Vacuum
evaporation
Used to concentrate process solutions or rinse-waters
(4.16.12.1.1*) where:
air pollution is potential problem
relatively low evaporation temperatures are needed to
avoid problems with solutions sensitive to temperature
and/or oxidation
alkaline cyanide solutions that build up carbonates
easily
energy costs are high for atmospheric evaporation.
Produce high-quality condensate that can be re-used and a
concentrate that that may be re-used, recycled or is
managed as waste.
High capital cost.
Application-specific potential for fouling and
separation limitations.
Periodic waste streams form clean out if
there is fouling.
Some concentrated wastes may be
difficult to dispose of if not recycled or
re-used.
Chapter 4
302 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Technique
Applicability:
references to sections with examples of uses
(Key process descriptions are marked *)
Limitations Cross-media effects
Electrolysis
Recovery of
metals
Widely used to recover precious metals, copper, zinc, tin,
tin/lead. The more noble the metal, the easier plating out is
(4.12.1*).
Best carried out from concentrated solutions, such as a
static rinses, and in combination with other techniques e.g.
ion exchange regenerates and reverse osmosis concentrates
(4.7.12).
There are options to improve efficiency and overcome
electrode polarisation and low ion diffusion rates.
Chromium is the only common metal not usually
recovered (but see 4.12.1*).
Minimum practical concentrations vary, but plating
from low concentrations difficult (see Applicability).
Metals recovery can be difficult for solutions that
contain chelated or complexed metals, reducing
agents or stabilisers.
High current use if concentration is
very low.
Electrolysis
plating out
Removal of metallic impurities (at low current densities,
LCD) which accumulate with time, e.g.:
nickel strikes, and plating nickel, copper,
cadmium, and trivalent chromium (4.11.8*)
removing excess metals (4.11.9*).
purifying acids (e.g. sulphuric from copper wire
pickling).
Electrolysis
oxidation
Oxidation of cyanide solutions (4.16.4).
High-current density (HCD) to oxidise Cr(III) to Cr(VI)
and organic by-products (4.11.10*).
Ion exchange
resin
General description Annex 8.7*
1. Used to remove ions to increase of water:
improving incoming water quality in deionisation
water softening applications (4.4.5.1)
rinse-water recovery (4.7.8.1)
waste water treatment applications (4.16.10)
2. Concentration of ions onto resin, and recovery of
concentrated metals solution (4.12.2)
Ion exchange may become impractical for use with
total dissolved solids concentrations above 500 ppm,
due to the need for frequent regeneration.
Different resins have different effective pH ranges.
Oxidants, solvents, organics, oil and grease, and
strong acids or alkalis (with the inappropriate resins)
can degrade resins.
Suspended solids can clog resin columns.
Chemicals used in regeneration.
Impacts of waste solutions from
regeneration.
Energy consumption used for pumping.
Electro-
deionisation
Effective for relatively high purity water
purification/recovery applications, such as polishing
treatment of reverse osmosis permeate (no example).
No chemical usage in resin
regeneration.
Acid (resin)
sorption or
retardation
Regeneration of acids, particularly for pickling and etching
(4.11.3*) including anodising (4.11.3.1*)
Not applicable for some highly concentrated acids.
Should not be used on acids with anionic complexes
that sorb to the resin, thus reducing acid recovery.
Application-specific temperature limitations should
not be exceeded
Only a part of the free or unused acid is
recovered. 33 70 %of the acid may
end up in the waste stream and require
treatment.
Ion exchange
liquid/liquid
Currently only one application: in PCB manufacture,
recycling of alkali (ammonia) etchants with copper
recovery (4.15.7*)
High capital cost. Some power consumption.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 303
Technique
Applicability:
references to sections with examples of uses
(Key process descriptions are marked *)
Limitations Cross-media effects
Membrane
filtration
microfiltration
(MF)
ultrafiltration
(UF)
nanofiltration
(NF)
Input water purification (MF and UF, 4.4.5.1)
Removal of oils and greases from degreasing baths (MF
and UF, 4.11.13.6*) and in coil coating (4.14.7)
Waste water treatment: increases amount of solids
removed, and hence lower metals levels achieved, e.g.
replace clarification and polishing applications,
(4.16.10), zero discharge techniques (4.16.12), etc
For PCBs, filtration of stripped resist from effluents
(4.15.5).
Cleaning agents removed along with oils/greases.
Cleaners with high silicate concentrations less
amenable to treatment.
Aluminium cleaning solutions not recycled due to
build up of dissolved aluminium.
Waste oil/grease or solids to dispose of:
Power consumption for pumping.
Clogging of membranes, depending on
solutions treated.
Reverse osmosis
(RO)
Purifying input water for generating high-quality deionised
water (4.4.5.1)
Separation and recovery of rinse-waters and chemical for:
In general (4.7.8.2*)
nickel electroplating (4.7.11, 4.7.11.5
copper (acid and cyanide)
acid zinc
chromate
Large-scale waste water recycling.
In combination with other techniques:
(4.7.12, 4.16.12.2)
Membrane performance deteriorates with time.
Membranes subject to fouling by organics, water
hardness, suspended solids (may require pre-
filtering, prior pH control and control of ionic
concentration).
Some ions such as borates show poor rejection.
Oxidising agents can damage membranes, as well as
acid or alkali solutions >0.25 molar.
Osmotic pressure limits RO to <5000 ppm TDS.
Energy for pumping to overcome
osmotic pressure of solution.
Diffusion dialysis
Maintain or reclaim spent or contaminated acids where
acid concentrations are >3 %w/w, such as:
For HCl, H
2
SO
4
HNO
3
pickle and strip solutions
(4.11.14.2*)
anodising solutions
HNO
3
/HF stainless steel pickling solutions
HCl/H
2
SO
4
aluminium etch solutions
methane sulphonic acid (MSA) solutions
Acids not highly dissociated (e.g. H
3
PO
4
) will not
diffuse across the membrane.
Complexed metal anions (e.g., fluorotitanium) can
readily diffuse and are not well separated.
Cooling may be needed if influent >50C or heating
if cold.
The recovered acid is not full strength
and fresh acid is still needed.
Depleted acid waste stream contains 5
20 acid and 60 95 %of metals from
influent, which require treatment.
Requires deionised water supply.
Membrane
electrolysis
Extends bath life for chromic acid solutions and other acid
based etchants (including for plastics), pickling and
stripping solutions. Removes contaminants.
Oxidises Cr(III) to Cr(VI) (4.11.11*)
Multi-cell systems can be used with highly corrosive acids.
Extending life of autocatalytic nickel solutions (in 3.2.3.4)
Special materials may required for construction.
Anionic metal complexes require pretreatment.
Operating temperatures limited between 15 60 C.
Oil, grease and solvents can damage membranes.
Suspended solids and precipitates can clog
membranes.
Hazardous fumes may be generated.
Chapter 4
304 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Technique
Applicability:
references to sections with examples of uses
(Key process descriptions are marked *)
Limitations Cross-media effects
Electrodialysis
Maintain nickel electrolytes by removing organic
decomposition products (preserves ductility of the nickel
deposit). (4.11.2)
Maintain and extends life of electroless nickel solutions
(4.11.2).
Extends life of pickling acids and etching solutions (such
as for tin. tin/lead) (4.11.14.2*)
Recovery of metals from rinse-waters, e.g. nickel
(4.7.11.4*).
To prevent blocking of the membrane, pickling acids
must be pre-filtered.
Power consumption.
Table 4.13: Common techniques for treating aqueous systems
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005
4.11 Process solution maintenance

Proper control of bath operating parameters will result in more consistent workpiece/substrate
quality as well as longer bath life. This requires determining critical operating parameters and
maintaining them within the established acceptable limits [67, IAMS, 2003].

Contaminants which affect the quality of treatment accumulate in process solutions as
conversion or decomposition products during processing or drag-in from preceding solutions
with the workpieces/substrates. Batch or continuous maintenance and regeneration are therefore
necessary especially when the renewing function of drag-out is eliminated through drag-out
recovery.

Particularly when carrying out solution maintenance on a batch or ad hoc basis, care must be
taken to prevent spillages when pumping concentrated solutions from tank to tank, by ensuring
all tanks are properly and evenly supported inside contained areas, pump drips and spillages are
collected and pipework is secure, see Section 4.2.1.

In principle, there is a difference between electrochemical and chemical process solutions.

Electrochemical procedures with dissolving anodes are based on metal ions migrating to the
cathode in the applied electrical field and are reduced to the metal. In electroplating, the
workpiece or substrate is connected as a cathode, while the anode usually consists of the metal
to be deposited. Within the electrical field ideally the same quantity of metal dissolves from the
anode, as it is cathodically deposited, so that the composition of the process solution remains
essentially constant. That means that the service life of the process solution of electrochemical
processes is theoretically infinite. However in practice the process solutions suffer quality losses
by the entry of impurities and formation of interfering substances by different causes, such as:

introduction of interfering substances from preceding process solutions due to
insufficient rinsing
dissolving of base metal (in particular with acid working process solutions)
chemical change of the process solutions (reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) with the
chromium plating, carbonate formation by reaction of CO
2
from air in alkaline cyanide
process solutions)
higher dissolution of anode metal than separation at the cathode
decomposition of organic compounds in the process solutions.

In other processes, chemicals are also consumed, such as the reduction of metal ions to metal by
chemical reducing agents at activated sites on the basic material in autocatalytic plating, or other
chemical reactions take place (such as layer conversion). Metal ions, reducing agents and other
chemicals must be added in salt form constantly, so in principle the service life of these
solutions is limited.

Because of these degradation processes, the quality of a process solution can deteriorate to the
extent that it must be discarded, unless it is possible to keep the quality of the process solutions
constant by the application of a regeneration technique, such as those described in this section.

The procedures described this section are not limited exclusively to electrolytes. They include
the care of pickling and etching solutions, degreasing solutions, etc. The remarks are limited to
the technical description of the individual procedures for avoidance and decrease of
environmental nuisance.

The following Table 4.14 shows the most significant disturbing solution pollutants for many
processes.

Some are dealt with elsewhere and are cross-referenced:
Chapter 4
306 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Process Solution Disturbing pollutants Remarks Maintenance technique
Reference
to
description
of technique
Soak cleaner
Sludge of oil, liquid grease, metal
slivers, dirt etc.
Removed from the work Described in detail in Section 4.11.13
4.11.13
Pickling of metals Dissolved metal Large volumes only Retardation 4.11.3
Pickling of plastics Dissolved resin
reduced oxidising agent
Balance situation Reoxidation through ceramic membrane
4.11.10
Desmear of multilayers Dissolved resin Cr(VI) and O
4--
Electrolytic reoxidation 4.11.10
Electrolytic cleaner Dissolved metal, oil, grease Use overflow compartment Skimmer 4.11.13.8
Redundant copper
May be used in an extra tank for cyanide oxidation
for waste water treatment and/or Cu recycling. In the
plating bath, it will oxidise cyanide to ammonia and
carbonate, which are unwanted decomposition
products.
Insoluble anodes with individual DC supply
4.4.1.2
Cyanide copper
Decomposition products of organic
additives, carbonates
Active carbon treatment
Dilution of solution
4.11.6
Redundant copper Dilution of solution
Acid copper Decomposition products of organic
additives
Active carbon treatment
4.11.6
Electroless copper Decomposition products Feed and bleed
Redundant nickel Membrane anodes with individual DC
supply
4.4.1.2
4.8.2
Selective plating cathode at low current
densities
4.11.9
Dull nickel, Watts type
By-metals
Electrodialysis can be used to remove
breakdown products
4.11.2
Redundant nickel Dilution of solution
4.4.1.2
4.8.2
Decomposition products of organic
additives
Active carbon treatment
Electrodialysis
Adsorber resin treatment
4.11.6
4.11.2
4.11.7
Elective plating cathode at low current
densities
4.11.9
Bright nickel, Watt's Type
By-metals as Zn, Cu, Fe
Electrodialysis can be used to remove
breakdown products
4.11.2
Sulphamate nickel Decomposition products of surfactants
Active carbon treatment
Electrodialysis can be used to remove
breakdown products
4.11.6
4.11.2
Electroless nickel for plastics
Orthophosphite, sulphate, sodium
palladium
Replace after lifetime
Electrodialysis can be used to remove
breakdown products
4.11.2
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 307
Electroless nickel for metals Orthophosphite, sulphate, sodium
Replace after lifetime
Electrodialysis can be used to remove
breakdown products
4.11.2
Bright chromium and hard
chromium
Cr(III), by-metals, dissolved from plated
items
Static rinse-water recirculated over cation
exchanger prior to balance evaporation
losses of treatment solution
4.11.7
4.7
Alkaline zinc Carbonates
Crystallisation of carbonate by low
temperature treatment, batch and/or
continuously
4.11.4
Redundant zinc Insoluble anodes
4.4.1.2
4.8.2
Cyanide Zinc
Decomposition products
carbonates
Crystallisation of carbonate by low
temperature treatment, batch and/or
continuously
4.11.4
Redundant zinc
Membrane anodes with individual DC
supply
4.4.1.2
4.8.2
Acid Zinc
Decomposition products of organic
additives
Active carbon treatment
H
2
O
2
treatment with lots of air
4.11.6
By-metal (iron) Oxidise FeII to insoluble Fe III
High pH
H
2
O
2
treatment and filter
Zinc-nickel (alkaline) Carbonates
Crystallisation of carbonate by low
temperature
4.11.4
Zinc iron Carbonate
Crystallisation of carbonate by low
temperature
4.11.4
Passivation
Conversion products of passivated zinc
and zinc alloys, sulphate, by-metals
Feed and bleed
Aluminium pickling
Caustic etch recovery
Dissolved aluminium, Al(OH)
3
Removal of Al(OH)
3
NaOH
Aluminium anodising
(sulphuric)
Dissolved aluminium
Usually more economic to replace solutions, and use
old solution to neutralise waste waters [113,
Austria, 2003]
Retardation (see comments)
Aluminium anodising
(chromic acid)
Dissolved aluminium, Cr
+
Filtration not appropriated
Feed and bleed
Correct anode--cathode ratio
Electrolytic colouring Sn
4+
Aluminium enrichment Feed and bleed
Drag in of sulphate and phosphate
Iron hydroxide
Feed and bleed based on colour
Filtration
4.11.1
Inorganic colouring
Free ferri-ammonium oxalate
Affects colour
Reaction with H
2
O
2
Organic colouring Numerous pollutants Regeneration difficult
Silver
Decomposition products, potassium
carbonate
Based on potassium Feed and bleed
Static rinses
Metal hydroxides, depending on pH,
surfactants and algae
Filtration
4.11.1
Phosphating baths Metals, pH adjust metals concentration and pH Filter 4.11.1
Table 4.14: Examples of techniques applied for maintenance of process solutions
Chapter 4
308 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.11.1 Filtration of process solutions

Description
Particles suspended in electrolytes can generate negative effects on the layer quality (in
particular by inclusion of the particles into the layer). The filtration of process solutions is used
to remove particles (e.g. splinters or dirt), which were introduced by the workpieces/substrate,
anode mud, dust from the air or the insoluble compounds developed during the process (such as
metal hydroxides). In order to guarantee a continuous removal of the solids, the filter is operated
in a bypass to the process tank, see Figure 4.22.

Treatment vat
filter
Contaminated filter material
Purified electrolyte
Figure 4.22: Filtration of process solutions

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of the process solution life.

Cross-media effects
Energy consumption for pumping.

Renewable materials are preferred as a filtration medium, since increased waste results from
disposable filters.

Filters which cannot be used any more despite back flushing are usually contaminated with
hazardous solution remainders and need to be disposed of as hazardous waste.

Applicability
Many solutions can benefit. The filtration of process solutions in surface treatment is part of the
normal practice to extend process solution life.

Economics
The investment required for filtration is small with costs of a few hundred to thousands of euros.
They are usually economically viable, as insufficient filtration causes surface quality problems
and the process solution must be rejected earlier than it otherwise need be, as well as the cost of
reworking reject work.
Driving force for implementation
Reduction in frequency of replacing solution.
See Economics, above.

Example plants
Widely used in many installations.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003].

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 309
4.11.2 Electrodialysis

Description
See also pickling, Section 4.11.14.2. Maintenance by electrodialysis, for example, removes
organic decomposition products from nickel electrolytes and preserves the ductility of the nickel
deposits. It is also used to extend the lifetime of electroless nickel plating solutions.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of bath quality and lifetime.

Cross-media effects
See Section 4.11.14.2

Operational data
See Section 4.11.14.2

Driving force for implementation

Example plants
Small installation: Siemens AG in Speyer (Germany)
Large installation: Otto Kynast in Quakenbrck (Germany)

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002]

4.11.3 Retardation (acid resin sorbtion)

Description
Retardation (or acid resin sorption) is an ion exchange separation technique used primarily for
the regeneration of acids (e.g. pickling acids and etchants such as in anodising).

A high concentration solution containing metal (or acid salt) is pumped upstream through an ion
exchange resin, where the major proportion of the acid anions penetrate into the resin of an
anion exchanger while the metal cations are excluded by electrostatic repulsion, and pass
through. In the second step, water is pumped downstream through the resin; the acid is set free
again. The recovered acid can be re-used. A depletion rate of between 40 and 60 % can be
achieved, depending on the type of acid and metal (see Figure 4.23).

Resin
Resin
First stage upflow
Exhaustion of anodising solution
Second stage downflow
Elution and regeneration of acid
with water
Water and
metal salt
Regenerated anodising solution
with reduced salt content
Water
Sulphuric anodising solution
with aluminium (or other metal salt)
Figure 4.23: Retardation process

Chapter 4
310 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Achieved environmental benefits
Recovery of used acids.

Cross-media effects
The acid sorption process recovers only a portion of the free or unused acid. It does not recover
any of the combined acid (salt). As a result, approximately 35 to 70 % of the total acid used is
incorporated into a waste stream from the process and will require treatment. Depending on the
metal involved, treatment will range from conventional neutralisation (pH adjustment with
caustic) to metals removal (e.g., precipitation).

Operational data
Not applicable for some highly concentrated acids.
Should not be used on acids with anionic complexes that sorb to the resin, thus reducing
acid recovery.
Application-specific temperature limitations should not be exceeded (e.g., approximately 32 C
for nitric acid, and up to 70 C for sulphuric or hydrochloric acid).

Applicability
Can be used on

sulphuric acid anodising baths for aluminium
sulphuric or nitric acid pickling, etching, or brightening baths for copper or brass
nitric/hydrofluoric acid pickling baths used for processing stainless steel
phosphoric and/or sulphuric acid baths for stainless steel or aluminium electropolishing
cation ion exchange acid regenerated solutions
sulphuric or hydrochloric acid pickling baths for steel and galvanized steel.

Economics
See Section 4.11.3.1.

Driving force for implementation
Recovery of used acid, particularly to provide a constant acid quality to ensure process stability
See Section 4.11.3.1)

Example plants
See Section 4.11.3.1.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 53, France, 2003, 86, EIPPCB, , 162, USEPA, 2000]

4.11.3.1 Retardation regeneration of sulphuric acid anodising solution

Description
The dissolved aluminium levels in the sulphuric acid anodising operation must be kept low.
When the aluminium level in the acid reaches 15 - 20 g/l, the anodising bath is decanted or
dumped. Continuous purification can eliminate waste and enhance the uniformity of the
anodised film.

Operating an anodising bath presents a number of potential problems. There is a delicate
balance within an anodising bath between the electrical resistance (caused by the oxide coating
being created) the anodising solution conductivity, the applied voltage, and the controlled
constant current condition. The electrical resistance increases according to the thickness of the
oxide coating and decreases when aluminium concentration rises in the anodising solution. To
compensate this increased resistance, the rectified voltage must be increased so that the current
remains stable. Other variables such as bath temperature, degree of solution agitation, and
sulphuric acid concentration cause a decline in product quality. Maintaining a stable low
aluminium concentration removes or lowers a variable affecting the balance between resistance,
voltage, and current.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 311
An anodising bath containing 200 g/l H
2
SO
4
and 5 - 10 g/l Al is passed over an anion exchange
resin bed (preferentially upstream) until the sulphuric acid appears in the bed effluent and the
whole resin becomes saturated with sulphuric acid.

When the resin is rinsed with demineralised water, the aluminium sulphate which is not
absorbed by the resin beads appears first in the eluate, followed by the sulphuric acid, which has
to be replaced by demineralised water from inside the resin beads.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of process solution life.
The whole pickling solution is recovered.

Cross-media effects
Retardation generates a high volume of waste water.
Alternatively, waste acids can be used in waste water treatment, replacing fresh acids for this
purpose. This will depend on waste acid generation and waste water requirements.

Operational data
For optimum performance, it is essential that the acid concentration of the process bath exceeds
10 %.

Applicability
The efficiency of retardation decreases in the following sequence:
HCl >HNO
3
>HClO
4
>H
2
SO
4
>(HF)
n
>H
3
PO
4
>tartaric acid.

Controlling the aluminium concentration and recovery of sulphuric acid for a continued process
in the aluminium finishing industry has been carried out for years.

Economics
The cost of a regeneration unit system for sulphuric acid anodising is between EUR 30000 and
60000.

Driving force for implementation
The end result is ensuring a stable, predictable bath operation leading to cost savings and
improved product quality.

Example plants
LRB Roulie, Nanterre, France

Reference literature
[53, France, 2003] [121, France, 2003] [3, CETS, 2002, 118, ESTAL, 2003]

4.11.4 Crystallisation of carbonates and metal sulphates

Description
Cold crystallisation is a technology by which interfering salts can be separated selectively from
a process solution. These salts are formed by the dissolving of metals or metal oxides (pickling)
or by unwanted reactions (oxidation of cyanide to carbonate). By cooling down a solution to
<5 C, the solubility of most of the salts is reduced. Only certain salts in the selected salt
mixture crystallise with the cooling down of a solution, while the remaining salts stay in the
solution, see Figure 4.24.

Chapter 4
312 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Process tank
Crystal
deposits
Cooling
circulation
Figure 4.24: Operating principle of cold crystallisation

Simple systems can be utilised, where the solution is pumped to a tank that can be cooled
naturally during a winter shut-down period. This also enables other maintenance to be carried
such as checking tank liner integrity, removing broken jigs and dropped workpieces.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of the process solution life.

Cross-media effects
Additional energy will be required for cooling, where this is applied. This may be necessary in
warmer countries.

For anodising, the additional energy requirements for cooling outweigh the benefits from
crystallisation.

For cyanide solutions, the precipitated carbonate will contain cyanide.

The wastes produced will require management as hazardous wastes, unless the metal content is
sufficiently high for recovery.

Simple pumping out systems increase the risk of spillages.

Operational data
The service lifetime extension attainable by cold crystallisation depends on:

the type of salts to be frozen out of the electrolyte
the process of salt formation
the time necessary for the process.

In many cases, this is carried out in winter, especially during shut down periods, such as
Christmas, when the solution can be cooled naturally.

Applicability
Due to the diversity of each application, an individual examination of each case is
recommended.

Economics
For electroplating, the investment is in the order of EUR 15000 to 20000 for a cooling system.

Simpler systems using winter temperatures for cooling require only a tank and pump.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 313
Example plants
In Germany, approximately 10 % of installations have this technique installed.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003] [[118, ESTAL, 2003, 124, Germany, 2003]

4.11.5 Anodising caustic etch recovery

Description
A hot solution of sodium hydroxide creates a decorative matt surface finish by removing a thin
layer of aluminium. This etching process is caused by a reaction between the aluminium and
caustic soda that produces sodium aluminate and hydrogen gas:

Etching reaction: 2Al + 2NaOH Y2NaAlO
2
+ 3H
2
(gas)

The etching process is typically responsible for 80 - 90 % of the aluminium in the waste
treatment system.

Chemical stabilisers (complexing agents) are added to prevent the aluminium from precipitating
out in the etch tank. Water is used to rinse the etching solution off the parts. The rinse-water
carries dissolved aluminium and caustic to the plant waste treatment system.

If stabilisers are not used, the sodium aluminate concentration becomes too high and it will
hydrolyse to produce alumina trihydrate (Al
2
O
3
(H
2
O)
3
), liberating free caustic soda.

Hydrolysis reaction: 2NaAlO
2
+ 4H
2
O Y2NaOH + Al
2
O
3
(H
2
O)
3
This reaction, known as the Bayer process, is used in the primary aluminium industry to make
alumina. If not properly controlled, it leads to an accumulation of a rock-hard aluminium
hydroxide scale in the etch tank.
A regeneration system recirculates the etch solution continuously between the etch tank and a
separate crystalliser tank, where the etch solution is seeded with alumina crystals in a separate
crystalliser tank. It is then possible to regenerate the etch solution without scale building up.

The hydrated alumina crystals formed in the crystalliser settle out in a settlement section.
Regenerated etch solution, with reduced aluminium and increased free caustic levels, feeds back
to the etch bath directly from the top of the crystalliser. Alumina crystals are withdrawn
periodically from the bottom of the crystalliser and dewatered in a vacuum filter.

Achieved environmental benefits
Regeneration can reduce a plants solid waste by over 80 % while lowering caustic chemical
(and neutralisation) costs by over 70 %.

The removed alumina crystals may be used in a variety of alumina substitutes (however, this is
dependant on quality, see Cross-media effects, below).

Cross-media effects
In some installations, to achieve a specific quality for specified products, additives may be
added to the etching baths which generate impurities in the recovered alumina. The alumina is
then impure and is not directly usable.

Operational data
The use of some additives may inhibit precipitation of alumina.
The process is difficult to control.

Chapter 4
314 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Applicability
Where the use of additives to achieve a specific surface specification does not interfere with the
process or prevents the re-use of the alumina

Economics
Although these systems are relatively expensive to install, larger plants can recover their costs
within two or three years.

Driving force for implementation
Economic and waste reduction.

Reference literature
[62, France, 2003, 152, ESTAL, 2004, 165, Tempany, 2004]

4.11.6 Activated carbon treatment

Description
Activated carbon filtration is an absorption technique (or adsorption, in the case of activated
carbon) and used with filtration. Organic decomposition products in electrolytic solutions tend
to disturb electrolytic metal deposition or the properties of the metal deposit itself. The major
proportion of such products can be extracted from electrolytes through activated carbon
treatment. The quantity of active carbon needed depends on the quantity of the products to be
removed: up to 10 g/l may be necessary.

Activated carbon is mixed into the electrolyte and removed by filtration after a suitable reaction
time. A combination of normal filtration and active carbon cartridges in by-pass is used to
continuously remove both solid contaminants and soluble organic decomposition products from
the electrolytes.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of process solution life.
Theoretically, contaminated activated carbon can be regenerated, but this is usually not
economical or has associated limiting cross-media effects.

Cross-media effects
Additional energy in pumping. Used carbon filters may need to be disposed of as hazardous
waste.

Operational data
The process is non-specific and also removes active process substances. Compensating
additions need to be made to the process solution.

Applicability
The process is widely used, and frequently for bright nickel electrolytes.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003]

4.11.7 Ion exchange purification of metallic contamination

Description
Ion exchange is described in general in Annex 8.7. The technique can be used to selectively
remove unwanted metal ions (cations) from aqueous solutions and cation exchange resins with
special properties, such as resistance to strong oxidants, are used. An example for chromic acid
regeneration is shown in Figure 4.25.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 315
Chromic
electrolyte
Rinse 1 Rinse 2 Rinse 3 Rinse 4
Cation
exchanger
Cation
exchanger
Anion
exchanger
Sodium
chromate
Chromic
acid
Waste water
Rinse water
Chemicals for
regeneration
Fresh water
Figure 4.25: Chromic acid electrolyte regeneration by ion exchange

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of the process solution life.

Cross-media effects
Eluates arising from ion exchange column regeneration have to be treated in waste water plants.

Applicability
This technique is applied in by-pass for the regeneration of process solutions, such as
phosphoric acid pickling and chromium plating electrolytes. It is essential when using Cr(III)
electrolytes (see Section 2.5.3) although control may be more difficult than for other ions.
Selection of the correct resin is essential.

Metal pollution in process baths can be removed by using acid cation exchangers, e.g.
chromium electrolyte: removal of Fe(III), Cr(III), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II).

Example: Chromic acid passivation after zinc plating. After weeks of working, the bath contains
Zn(II)

which must be removed to increase the solution life. When the bath contains more than
15 mg/l of zinc it must be changed. Zn(II) can be removed using a cationic ion exchanger.

Economics
The technology is expensive and may not give payback for small installations.
Na
2
CrO
4
regeneration from passivation may not be economic.

Driving force for implementation
The technique is easy to integrate into the production process.

Example plants
In a Spanish installation, a cation exchange resin is used to treat a hexavalent chromium
solution. The recovered chromium solution is then concentrated in an evaporator and returned to
the solution..

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [120, Finland, 2003] [114, Belgium, 2003] [113, Austria, 2003] [114, Belgium,
2003] [129, Spain, 2003]
Chapter 4
316 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.11.8 Electrolysis purification of process solutions

Description
Some metallic contaminants can be removed selectively from electrolytes at low current
densities from 0.05 to 0.3 A/dm. The efficiency of this selective cleaning can be enhanced with
increased electrolyte throughput.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of process solution life.

Cross-media effects

Operational data
Not only unwanted metals, but also unused organic additives can be removed. Therefore
electrolytic purification may be reduced to a minimum or compensatory additions of organic
process materials may be necessary.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002]

4.11.9 Electrolysis removal of surplus metal from process solutions

Description
Metal process solutions where there is a higher anode yield than required in solution (such as
zinc and nickel) suffer from increasing metal concentration leading to over-plating. The
concentration can be lowered by electrolysis usually called plating out, see Section 4.8.2. A
typical system for maintaining nickel solution is shown in Figure 4.26, with activated carbon to
remove organic contaminants as well as electrolysis.

-
Nickel
alloy
+ -
Nickel plating
vat
Activated
carbon
filter
Electrolysis
cell
+
Figure 4.26: Electrolytic removal of surplus and contaminating metals

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of reworking.
Minimising dissolved metal drag-over into rinses.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 317
Cross-media effects
Unwanted metal in solution increases dragged-out quantities.

Operational data
High anode yield can be better controlled by using insoluble anodes and external metal
dissolution, see Section 4.8.2.

Applicability
Zinc and nickel electroplating with soluble anodes.

Driving force for implementation
Process control and minimisation of reworking.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003]

4.11.10 Electrolysis reoxidation of breakdown products

Description
Chromium/sulphuric acid pickling of ABS plastic items oxidises and dissolves the butadiene
component of the substrate, simultaneously generating trivalent chromium. Both the organic
decomposition product and the trivalent chromium will disturb the process if a tolerable
concentration level is exceeded.

It is possible to oxidise trivalent chromium without a membrane but with adequate anodic and
cathodic density conditions.

Ceramic membrane electrolysis is the more reliable means to continuously regenerate process
solutions, see Section 4.11.9.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of the process solution life.

Applicability
Chromium/sulphuric acid pickling of ABS plastic items.

Driving force for implementation
Product and process quality.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [129, Spain, 2003]

4.11.11 Membrane electrolysis for chromium solution maintenance

Description
Membrane electrolysis uses one or more ion-selective membranes to separate electrolyte
solutions within an electrolysis cell. The membranes are ion-permeable and selective. Cation
membranes pass cations such as Cu and Al, but reject anions. Anion membranes pass anions,
such as sulphates and chlorides, but reject cations.

Membrane electrolysis can regenerate process solutions through two primary mechanisms:

(1) Selective transfer of ions from the process solution, across the membrane, into an
electrolyte solution and
(2) Regenerating oxidation states/ionic forms of key constituents in the process solution
through electrode electrochemical reactions.

Chapter 4
318 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
A common configuration for removing cation contaminants from surface finishing process
solutions uses a cation specific membrane coupled with a two-cell compartment drawing an
electrical potential applied across the membrane. One cell contains an anode with the anolyte
solution; the other contains a cathode with the catholyte solution.

The anolyte solution is typically the spent process solution requiring regeneration. Contaminant
cations are removed from the anolyte solution and transferred into the catholyte solution. Anode
and cathode reactions occur based on the relative electro-negativity and concentration of
specific ions in each solution, as water decomposes.

An electrolytic cell technique with fluidised bed technology and used in conjunction with semi-
permeable membranes extends the life of a hexavalent solution by 300 to 400 %.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduces chemical usage.
Extends solution life.

Cross-media effects
Low power consumption.
Hazardous fumes may be emitted depending on solution (see Operational data, below).

Operational data
The membrane life depends on the conditions but can be more than a year.

Limitations of membrane electrolysis:

special materials of construction and cell configurations may be required for processing
highly corrosive fluids
fume collection and treatment may be required if hazardous gases are generated in
electrode reactions
anionic metal complexes require pretreatment prior to removal across a cation exchange
membrane
operating temperatures are typically limited from 15c to 60c
oil, grease and solvents can adversely affect membranes
suspended solids and precipitates can clog membranes.

Membrane electrolysis systems can be configured as multi-cell systems to enhance capacity.
Three compartment cells are used for special applications where the electrodes must be isolated
from the feed stream. A range of selective and custom-made electrodes are available for
removal of special and noble metals.

Applicability
Membrane electrolysis has been used with chromic acid based solutions, including chromium
plating, chromic acid anodising, etchants and chromating solutions. Trivalent chromium can be
beneficially deoxidised at anodes to hexavalent chrome. Contaminant metals are transported
into the catholyte. Membrane electrolysis has also been applied to various acid-based etchants,
stripping and pickling solutions to remove contaminant metals. Multi-cell systems with special
anolyte and/or catholyte solutions have been used with highly corrosive acids, such as nitric and
hydrofluoric, to isolate the electrodes. Membrane electrolysis can be used on a batch or
continuous basis, and is often configured as a mobile unit for smaller point source applications.

Economics
Typical plant costs are EUR 15000 for the unit with annual operating costs of EUR 300.

Driving force for implementation
Materials and cost saving.
Process and quality reliability.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 319
Example plants
BAe Systems plc, Balderstone, Lancs, UK

Reference literature
[110, BEWT, 2003]

4.11.12 Cleaning and regeneration of phosphate solutions

Description
See Sections 2.5.16 and 2.9.8.9.
Spent phosphate solution is filtered; the concentrations in metallic ions and the pH are adjusted.
The regenerated phosphate solution is re-used.

Achieved environmental benefits
Environmental benefit is high. Reduces the consumption of chemicals, reduces water and sludge
releases.

Cross-media effects
None.

Applicability
New and existing plant, provided space is available.

Economics
Investment costs are EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed and operating costs are EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency primarily.

Example plants
In several continuous electroplating lines in EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]
Chapter 4
320 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.11.13 Maintenance of degreasing solutions

Table 4.15 summarises the techniques described in this section that may be used to maintain and
extend the lives of degreasing solutions.

Technique Uses and comments Reference
Simple methods:
Filtration with cellulose filters
Low cost for low volumes, widely applicable
Mechanical separation
Gravity separation
Breaking emulsion by chemical
addition
Higher cost, but still widely applicable.
4.11.13.2
Static separator
Reduction in COD of effluent up to 50 %
Extends solution life 50 - 70 %
Simple in use and monitoring
High cost: only applicable to high volumes of oil
4.11.13.3
Biological degreasing/regeneration
Used for weak alkali and/or unstable emulsions.
Cheap and effective.
May not work for all oils/greases.
4.11.13.4
Centrifuging degreasing baths
98 % removal of oil
Low servicing
Use in restricted space
High cost: only applicable to high volumes of oil
4.11.13.5
Membrane filtration
COD load in effluent reduced 30 - 70 %
Up to 10-fold increase in bath life
High cost: only applicable to high volumes of oil
4.11.13.6
Multistage Cost varies according to options combined 4.11.13.7
Electrolytic degreasing Any of the same techniques as above 4.11.13.8
Cascading or re-using
Re-use or cascade the electrolytic cleaner to the soak
clean vat.
4.11.13.1
Table 4.15: Techniques for degreasing solution maintenance

4.11.13.1 Cascade (multiple) use of degreasing solutions

Description
One technique for extending the working life of degreasing solutions is to re-use the solution, or
use it in a cascade fashion. The solution from the electrolytic degreasing section is re-used once
a certain oil level is reached, either in the spray section of coil lines, or in the first degreasing
section of other lines. The spent degreasing solution of the spray section can be regenerated.

Achieved environmental benefits
Significant reduction in electrolytes and water consumptions within the processes and hence a
reduction in the quantity of waste water volumes.

Applicability
New and existing plant, provided space is available.
Not applicable where specific solutions are used for the electrochemical degreasing (e.g. highly
alkaline with high conductivity) and the precleaning (e.g. good oil solubility).

Economics
For coil systems, investments costs are EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed and operating costs are
EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency primarily.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 321
Example plants
In several continuous electroplating lines in the EU-15

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.11.13.2 Simple methods

Descriptions of typical simple methods
Simple filtration with cellulose filters, see Section 2.7.1.

Mechanical separation by skimmers.

Gravity oil separators working in by-pass separate oil/grease by allowing agglomeration of
small droplets of oil to larger globules which float to the surface and are then removed. This
may be enhanced by dissolved air flotation.

Separating emulsified oil by breaking down the emulsion. The easiest route is by chemical
addition which splits the wetting agent system and releases the oil, at the same time destroying
the degreasing effect.

Achieved environmental benefits
All methods remove oil and extend the working life of degreasing solutions.

Cross-media effects
Energy consumption for skimmers and for dissolved air flotation.
Chemicals used for demulsifying.
Cellulose filters have to be discarded periodically, increasing waste.

Operational data
Gravity separation is the lowest maintenance system.

Applicability
All degreasing solutions, depending on solution life, and investment costs.

Economics
Mechanical separation by skimmers is the simplest and cheapest method of removing floating
oil from the cleaner surface.

Driving force for implementation
Improved cleaning results in improved performance and reliability of subsequent surface
treatments. This in turn decreases rejects and reworking.

Reference literature
[129, Spain, 2003]

4.11.13.3 Static separator for degreasing baths

Description
Using a static separator (where the used degreasing bath is pumped by batch or continuously) is
a simple technique to increase the bath life, although baths may need active ingredients
adjusting to keep their efficiency. Physical separation by the difference in density between two
phases allows the separation of the oil-water mixture. This separation is made by natural
decantation of the separated oil in a separate tank off-line or by a mechanical system using a
scraper or oleophilic drum or belt skimmers on the surface.
Chapter 4
322 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Achieved environmental benefits
Large fall of the COD in the effluents, by 50 % in some cases.

Significant reduction in dumping of used solutions: in most cases reduction of between 50 and
70 %.

Reduction of detergent purchases by 50 %.

Cross-media effects
This process is less selective and also less expensive than techniques using membranes. The
recuperated oils are usually polluted and therefore destroyed.

There is only elimination of the floating layer, with just a small fraction of the emulsions
discarded.

Operational data
This technique is very simple (there is no membrane). Monitoring is very simple.

The pollution in the degreasing bath is maintained at a constant low level, reducing the level of
drag-out and minimising the use and pollution of rinsing water.

Eliminates the floating oils which represent the main pollution of a bath.

Decreases problems with waste water treatment by decreasing flocs and sludges coming from
hydrocarbons, and batch discharge of high pHs.

Very fine dispersions (emulsions, micro emulsions, COD) and soluble oils are not readily
separated. The polluted species concentration will increase in the bath and it will be necessary to
discard the solution or make additions of surface active agent.

Applicability
Best used with weak emulsion degreasing solutions, see Section 4.9.14.4

Economics
This is an inexpensive technology, depending on the size and sophistication of the technique
applied. At its most basic, it will comprise a separate tank, with pump, and pipework. Costs can
be up to EUR 50000 for a more complex system.

Driving force for implementation
High throughput through degreasing process.
Strong demand for high quality and consistent degreasing.
High cost of rejection and reworking.

Example plants
In France: Berezecki (Beauvais), Kerbrio (Gretz Armainvilliers), Berthollet (Montreuil)

Reference literature
[57, France, 2003]

4.11.13.4 Biological degreasing regeneration

Description
Although often referred to as a degreasing system, it is a maintenance system for weak alkali
degreasing baths. Its constant bypass regeneration of the bath by degrading the oil biologically
overcomes the limitation of the weak alkali bath: the accelerated exhaustion of its dissolution
capacity compared with strong alkali/stable emulsion systems. A typical layout is shown in
Figure 4.27, although simple systems with manual additional of additives also work well.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 323
Figure 4.27: Biological aqueous degreasing process
[3, CETS, 2002]
Workpieces/substrates are placed in the process solution consisting of mildly alkaline
emulsifying cleaners. In this case, the operating temperature is lower (approximately 45 C).
The ingredients include a surfactant to lift and emulsify dirt and oil from the surfaces, naturally
occurring micro-organisms to degrade the oils to carbon dioxide and water, and nutrients for the
micro-organisms. Air is bubbled into the solution at a low rate to ensure the system stays
aerobic. The solution is continuously circulated through a side tank, containing the micro-
organisms, where additions of nutrients and other process chemicals are made and the solution
continuously regenerates itself, with the occasional removal of small amounts of sludge from
the side tank.

There are several variants of this general type of biological degreasing process. In some
applications, the degreasing bath itself is used as a bioreactor and the workpieces to be
degreased are immersed into this solution-containing biomass. It can be operated as a two-stage
process with normal alkaline aqueous degreasing as a pre-degreasing stage followed by a
combined biological degreasing/rinsing stage where the bath itself is also the bioreactor.

Achieved environmental benefits
Runs at more neutral pH, with lower operating temperatures of around 45 .
Reduced use of process chemicals as the solution rarely needs replacement.
Reduction in use of hazardous chemicals in the workplace.
Reduced usage of neutralising chemicals when discharging used process solution and lower
impact of surfactants on effluent treatment.
Lower evaporation losses therefore less need to extract water vapour.

Cross-media effects
Possible growth of legionella bacteria and regular testing may be required.

Operational data
Reduces downtime of production line to replace spent solutions.

Ensures consistent quality of degreasing versus changing quality of chemical degreasing with a
short service life
Chapter 4
324 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Some operators report the process may not be suitable for all oils and greases (possible
problems with oils containing sulphur compounds).

In some applications, the biomass in the degreasing solution can be partially carried over into
the following process stages, causing quality problems to the following surface treatments.
Processes which combine a bioreactor with membrane separation are currently under
investigation to overcome the problem of the limited efficiency of lamella separators [124,
Germany, 2003].

The biological system can break down if only small amounts of biotoxic substances like
cyanide, copper, AOX, etc. are dragged into the solution. The system does not work with some
polishing pastes, which may also be biotoxic.

The right choice of surfactants is important. They need to be at least partially resistant
against microbial degradation.

The system requires a continuous supply of oil, or extra feeding if downtime is more than three
days.

The system does not give good cleaning quality if soaking in high temperatures is needed (for
example, with polished pieces).

Applicability
See Operational data, above. It is advisable to test all the likely applications (types of work
piece, types of oil/grease coating etc) before using on a full scale. Sufficient installations are
using this technique commercially for it to be considered.

Economics
One operator reports chemical savings of EUR 6000 7000 per year (2002) on two 50 kg barrel
lines.

Another operator reported chemical savings of EUR 3400 per electroplating line first year
savings and EUR 3800 per year per line thereafter (1999).

A medium sized contract electroplating company reported a 15 - 25 % reduction of specific
treatment costs for the degreasing/rinsing/pickling stage when substituting a conventional
aqueous hot alkaline degreasing process by a biological degreasing process.

None of these figures include savings in water, energy, labour in reduced solution make-up
time, increased efficiency (line downtime) and improved process performance (with less
rejects).

Driving force for implementation
Reduces process line downtime for degreasing solutions to be changed.
Reduces the amounts of hazardous chemicals in use in the workplace (replaces strong caustic
and surface active solutions).
Reduces sludges from the waste water treatment from cleaning by 80 %.
Reduced costs.

Example plants
Dundee Electroplating Ltd, Dundee, UK; Exhall Plating Ltd, Coventry, UK; Merrydale
Industries Ltd, Wednesbury, UK; Metal Colours Ltd, Slough, UK, Sessler Galvanotechnics,
GmbH, Germany, See Annex 8.5

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002, 31, Biowise, 2001] [124, Germany, 2003] [115, CETS, 2003] [113,
Austria, 2003]German Federal Ministry of Education and Research report 01RW0189
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 325
4.11.13.5 Centrifuging of degreasing baths

Description
Centrifuging cleans the degreasing baths by separating oils. The polluted degreasing solution is
pumped to a centrifugal separator. The oil is removed and collected for recovery separately to
the solids and sludge produced. The clean degreasing solution is then returned to the degreasing
bath.

Achieved environmental benefits
This process reduces the discarding of used baths contaminated with oil and solids.
The pollution in the degreasing bath is maintained at a constant low level, reducing the level of
drag-out and minimising the use and pollution of rinsing water.

Oil is recovered and concentrated at the output of the separator for possible recovery.
Sludges are collected separately.

Reduction of the draining frequencies (between 30 and 80 %) according to the size, the
production and many other parameters relative to the installation, with less heating and
downtime required.

There is no loss of surface active agent.

Cross-media effects
Electrical power for pumping and operating the centrifuge.

Operational data
The bath purification is higher than 98 %. According to a supplier, the residual oil concentration
is less than 2.5 g/l.

Drag-out is reduced; the following rinsings are less polluted so the treatment quality increases.

Limited servicing and maintenance (once every 2000 hours for automatic machines).

Centrifuging makes it possible to eliminate a large amount of oil in a restricted space.

The machines used can be mobile and can be used to treat baths of different origins.

It is very useful when the sedimentation speed of particles is very low.

Manual machines are sensitive to fouling by sludges and must be reserved for baths with a
relatively low sludge content. The maintenance of manual machines which have not been
sufficiently protected from sludges can be tedious.

Sometimes surface active agents must be added to maintain the bath efficiency because oil in
the micro-emulsion is not separated from the aqueous phase.

Applicability
The chemistry of the surface active agents must be adapted. Centrifuges cannot treat very acid
baths (pH <2).

Economics
It is a very expensive form of technology which costs at least EUR 50000 and can reach over
EUR 150000 when installation, the storage and collection of baths is included.

Driving force for implementation
High throughput through degreasing process.
Strong demand for high quality and consistent degreasing.
High cost of rejection and reworking.

Chapter 4
326 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Example plants
In France: Renault (Flingues, Clon) Chan-teou et Maury (Luc) Freudienne (Langres) Noiraud
(Laon), Rono (Noyon)

Reference literature
[46, France, 2003]

4.11.13.6 Membrane filtration of emulsifying degreasers (micro- or
ultrafiltration)

Description
This technique can be used where, for technical reasons, the use of strongly emulsifying
degreasing systems are necessary, and the regeneration of the cleaning solution by other
methods may become expensive or even impossible.

Membrane filtration technology, particularly micro or ultrafiltration is a process of physical
separation using membranes for the separation of particles from 0.005 to 0.1 micrometers (the
separation of smaller particles is by nanofiltration or reverse osmosis). There is a small
difference in pressure so that the liquid moves from one side of the membrane to the other.

Filtration is tangential, so that the fluid circulates in parallel with the membrane, rather than the
traditional filtration which is perpendicular or frontal (therefore loading particles onto the filter).
Tangential filtration allows the accumulation of fouling particles without fouling the filtration
surface. The liquid crossing the membrane is the filtrate or permeate and is a clean solution
containing purified detergent solution that is fed back in the degreasing bath. The solution
unable to cross the membrane is the retentate, containing oil and suspended material. A typical
system is shown in Figure 4.28.

Degreasing vat
Oil
Retentate
Permeate
Microfiltration
Figure 4.28: Bypass microfiltration for extending the service lifetime extension of a degreasing solution

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduced chemical and energy consumption in degreasing heavily contaminated workpieces or
substrates. Increase of the degreasing bath lifetime (up to 10 times). Reduction of detergent
consumption by 50 %

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 327
High reduction in pollution, reducing COD between 30 and 70 % according to water agency
data. There is less discarding of the used baths (usually with oil levels between 10 and 15 g/l).

Cross-media effects
Power consumption of pumping to microfiltration, although with tangential filtration the costs
will be lower than for a perpendicular system.

Operational data
The surfactant components may also be lost by permeating through the membranes, and for the
successful use of microfiltration, the composition of the chemicals in the cleaner must be
maintained.

The oil concentration in the bath decreases to 2 or 3 g/l and is held constant depending on the
filtering rate. The bath is filtered continuously, and with the constant efficiency of the
degreasing bath (between 500 and 800 microns), there are fewer problems of fouling when used
with spraying systems.

The choice of membranes have to be determined by tests, as there is a possibility of fouling
during use.

Applicability
Only a few operators have successfully retained the cleaning quality in practice over longer
periods. For this reason, the successful employment of the diaphragm cleaning system for
degreasing solutions requires the close co-operation of operators, equipment manufacturers and
chemical suppliers.

The cost effectiveness success of this technique is based on using the membrane best suited to
the wide range of pollutants encountered in a degreasing bath. Most of the equipment is
installed in in-house shops where the composition of oils to be removed is more constant.

Economics
Energy cost: electric consumption between 0.10 and 0.20 kWh per m
3
treated.
No draining down of hot used baths so less waste of heating energy.
No need to stop production to change degreasing baths.

The investment is relatively expensive. The cost of the ultrafiltration installation depends on the
particular situation of the company (volume vats, degreasing quality, quantity of oil to
eliminate, etc.). This cost is estimated between EUR 40000 and 200000 including the total price
of the ultrafiltration unit (membranes, storage of the ultrafiltrate and, in some cases, installation
of connection).

Driving force for implementation
Where heavily oiled/greased components require a strongly emulsifying degreasing system.
High throughput through degreasing process.
Strong demand for high quality and consistent degreasing.
High cost of rejection and reworking.

Example plants
In France: Renault (Sandoval, Clean), Renault Trucks (Plainville), Sausage Production Service
(Pont Saint Maxine), STILL (Minatare), Sachs Aliquant (Mousy), Ago France (Beavers).

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003] [19, Eurofer, 2003] [59, France, 2003] [121, France, 2003].

Chapter 4
328 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.11.13.7 Multistage maintenance of degreasing solutions

Description
Multistage systems use a simple method removing the majority of oil and/or grease followed by
diaphragm filtration. For example, gravity filtration followed by ultrafiltration.

Achieved environmental benefits
All remove oil and extend the working life of degreasing solutions.

Cross-media effects
Energy consumption for skimmers, dissolved air flotation or any other primary treatment, as
well as in pumping for subsequent diaphragm filtration.
Chemicals used for demulsifying.

Operational data
Improved process reliability both of cleaning and subsequent treatments.
Gravity separation is a simple system requiring low maintenance.

Applicability
Where large amounts of oil and grease are present on incoming workpieces or substrates, where
process line throughput is high, and/or where the quality of degreasing is highly critical to the
following treatments.

Economics
The size of subsequent (and possibly expensive) stages, such as ultrafiltration or mechanical
separation by skimmers can be reduced by pretreatment by simple techniques (see
4.11.13.2such as gravity separation (the simplest and cheapest simple method).

Driving force for implementation
Improved cleaning results in improved performance and reliability of subsequent surface
treatments. This, in turn, decreases rejects and reworking.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003]

4.11.13.8 Maintenance of electrolytic degreasing processes

The same processes used for alkaline cleaners can be applied for electrolytic cleaners, taking
into account that the quantity of oil removed is small compared with that removed in soak
cleaning.

4.11.14 Pickling

Pickling solutions lose activity by the dissolution of metals [124, Germany, 2003] as well as the
constant entry of rinsing water from the previous process stage, so they must be renewed at
relatively short intervals. At present, no techniques exist in practice to extend the service life of
pickling solutions, although two-stage or drag-in through a used picking solution may be
considered (see Section 2.3.6).

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 329
The prevention of over-pickling is important. Over-pickling is the attack of the pickling solution
on the basis metal, and in surface technology is an unwanted side effect, as it:

leads to increased acid consumption with increased metal erosion and thus also
increasing waste generation (from the dissolved metal being precipitated in waste water
treatment and the increased amount of waste acid generated)
causes substantial quality losses in the base material (hydrogen brittleness)
can degrade the quality of the workpiece surface and/or change the geometrical
measurements of the workpiece adversely.

Over-pickling can be prevented by the addition of so-called pickling inhibitors which are widely
used [104, UBA, 2003].

4.11.14.1 Measures for decreasing pickling acid consumption

Description
A three-stage cascade hydrochloric acid system running at 0.5 l/min is being used successfully
to remove hardening scale from parts prior to plating The system is identical to a cascade water
rinse system, but uses 32 % hydrochloric pickling acid instead of water.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extending chemical process life. A three-stage cascade system has reduced chemical usage by
50 % (the Example plant, see below, reported a drop from two tonnes to one tonne per day of
32 % hydrochloric acid).

A smaller, continuous flow of hydrochloric acid is more readily treated in a typical waste water
treatment plant, removing the problems caused by batch discharges of acid to treatment

Operational data
Substantial reduction in rejects, as the strength of the acid through the cascade system remains
constant and effective, unlike batch treat and dump systems, where acid strength decreases
constantly until replaced.

May require more process stages in line, and these will be in the most corrosive part of the line.

Applicability
This is applicable where some or all of the following apply:

pickling acid consumption is considerable
pickling of parts is on a large scale
quality of pickling is a problem, such as surfaces to be treated are resistant to pickling
(e.g. hardening scale, which require a constant supply of fresh acid)
batch acid discharges from pickling to waste water treatment adversely affect the
treatment.

Economics
Cost savings in materials offset the increased amount of plant required for multistage pickling.
Reduced rejects, see Operational data, above.

An example calculation for changing from three-stage static pickling to cascade rinsing is given
in Annex 8.11.

Driving force for implementation
For multistage pickling, increased process stability, decreased rejects and cost savings.

Chapter 4
330 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Example plants
Metal Colours Ltd, Slough, UK

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002, 104, UBA, 2003] [124, Germany, 2003]

4.11.14.2 Extension of the service life of pickling solutions by diffusion
dialysis

Description
If the concentration of the metal salts in the pickling solution, formed by dissolution, becomes
too high, no more pickling effect can be achieved even with further addition of acid. At this
point, the pickling bath is useless and is usually discarded. Further use of the pickling solution is
possible only by selective separation of the dissolved metal salts.

Diffusion dialysis separates acid from its metal contaminants via an acid concentration gradient
between two solution compartments (contaminated acid and deionised water) that are divided by
an anion exchange membrane, see Figure 4.29. Acid is diffused across the membrane into the
deionised water whereas metals are blocked due to their charge and the selectivity of the
membrane. A key difference between diffusion dialysis and other membrane technologies such
as electrodialysis or reverse osmosis is that diffusion dialysis does not employ an electrical
potential or pressure across the membrane. Rather, the transport of acid is caused by the
difference in acid concentration on either side of the membrane. As such, the energy
requirements for this technology are low.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 331
Pickling vat
Holding tank
Demineralised water
Depleted acid stream
Raw water feed
Dialysis
cell
Anionic
exchange
membrane
Acid rich solution
Figure 4.29: Regeneration of pickling solutions by dialysis

Feed Emissions Separating
integral parts
Parameters
Etching solution Water Diffusate Concentrate
Flowrate (l/h) 830 830 700 960
HCl, AlCl
3
HCl (g/l) 100 85 25
AlCl
3
(g/l) 30 0.7 26
Flowrate (l/h) 20 20 14 26
H
2
SO
4
, NiSO
4
H
2
SO
4
(g/l) 32 27 12
Ni (g/l) 1.7 <0.04 1.6
Table 4.16: Results of the dialysis treatment on etching solutions

Achieved environmental benefits
Extension of service life of the chemical process solution. Achieved concentrations are shown in
Table 4.16.
Lower power consumption than techniques using pressure

Cross-media effects
The concentration of recovered acid will normally be lower than that of the feed acid, and
make-up acid must be added to bring the concentration up to the process level. When the
feed has a significant salt concentration, the concentration of recovered acid can exceed the
concentration of the feed acid.

The depleted acid waste stream (after diffusion dialysis processing) is approximately equal in
volumetric flow to the waste acid influent. Depending on the application-specific acid removal
and metals rejection rates, the depleted acid waste stream (retentate) typically contains 5 to
20 % of the acid and 60 to 95 % of the metals from the influent waste acid stream. This stream
is usually sent to waste water treatment.

Chapter 4
332 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Operational data
To prevent mechanical blocking, pickling acids must be pre-filtered before using dialysis.

For diffusion dialysis processing, an increase in membrane area per unit of acid flow increases
the acid recovery rate. If the flowrate of DI water increases, the acid recycling rate increases and
the recycled acid concentration decreases.

Diffusion dialysis systems can be used for batch or continuous flow applications. Small systems
are often configured as mobile units.

Limitations in using diffusion dialysis to recover surface finishing process acids include:

acids not highly dissociated (e.g., phosphoric acid) will not diffuse across the membrane
complexed metal anions (e.g., fluorotitanium anions) can readily diffuse across the
anion exchange membrane and are not efficiently separated from the acid.

Cooling is typically needed if influent waste acid temperature exceeds 50 C.

Heating may be needed for low temperature influent waste acid. A temperature drop of 2 C
reduces the acid recycling rate by approximately 1.5 %.

Solvents can cause membrane swelling.

Strong oxidising substances (e.g., chromic acid) can cause membrane deterioration.

Applicability
Diffusion dialysis is a purification/recycling technology that can be used to maintain or reclaim
spent or contaminated acids where acid concentrations are greater than 3 % by weight.
Diffusion dialysis is most typically used where contaminant metals concentrations are less than
1 gram per litre. Surface finishing process solutions amenable to the use of diffusion dialysis
include:

hydrochloric acid (HCl) pickle and strip solutions
sulphuric acid (H
2
SO
4
) anodising solutions
sulphuric acid pickle and strip solutions
nitric acid (HNO
3
) pickle and strip solutions
nitric acid/hydrofluoric acid (HNO
3
/HF) stainless steel pickling solutions
hydrochloric acid/sulphuric acid (HCl/H
2
SO
4
) aluminium etch solutions
methane sulphonic acid (MSA) solutions.

Economics
Diffusion dialysis may be expensive in capital and running costs for simple applications, and
complex to run. The most cost-effective use for it may be, for example:

where there is significant use of the more expensive and/or concentrated acids (e.g.
phosphoric)
in expensive etching techniques such as methyl sulphonic acid used with tin and
tin/lead.

Driving force for implementation
Process consistency and quality.
Reduction in fresh acid, waste acid treatment or disposal costs.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003], [154, NMFRC, ] [129, Spain, 2003, 159, TWG, 2004, 162, USEPA, 2000]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 333
4.11.14.3 Recovery of copper from pickling baths

Description
In pickling baths for copper (non-ferrous metals), copper can be recycled by simple electrolysis
(see Section 4.12.1 for discussion) [113, Austria, 2003]

4.12 Recovery of process metals

This refers to recovery systems within installations, not to external processes.

4.12.1 Electrolytic recovery

Description
Metals may be recovered by electrolysis. The system is widely used for precious metal
recovery, but can also be used to recover other metals such as nickel and chromium from drag-
outs. Suitable electrolysis cells are marketed in different sizes and can operate down to metal
contents of less than 100 mg/l.

May be operated in conjunction with other techniques to achieve low emission levels for water,
or recycling of rinse-waters, etc, see Section 4.7.12
Achieved environmental benefits
Recovery of metals for re-use.
Reduction of metals in drag-out and their consequent decrease in effluent concentrations.
In the electrolytic separation of metal solutions containing cyanide, the anodically oxidative
destruction of the cyanide takes place in parallel to the metal winning.

Cross-media effects
Power consumption at low current efficiencies.

Operational data
Precious metals electrolytic recovery requires the electrolytic reactor to be able to reduce the
metal concentration down to a very low concentration (1 ppm or less). The current efficiency at
this level is very low. In all cases, a simple flat plate cathode would be sufficient in theory, but
when high current efficiencies are required (for both precious and transition metals)
sophisticated cathode design is needed (rotating tube cell, graphite fibre cathode), or a fluidised
bed to overcome cathode surface depletion (see Figure 4.30). In all cases (including anodic
oxidation) the anode must be of the insoluble type.

Chapter 4
334 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
+ve -ve
Unit return
Recirculating
Pump
Anodes and Cathodes
Fluidised
bed
Recirculating tank and lid
Inner cell
Anodes Cathodes
Figure 4.30: Optimised cell using fluidised bed technology
Chemelec cell, BEWT Environmental Services Ltd.

Cathodes are usually sheets, foil or particles, generally made of the same metal to be recovered,
but also of stainless steel or other metals, which allow either a mechanical parting of the deposit
from the cathode blank, or its removal by anodic dissolution. Iron, stainless steel, porous
carbon, graphite particles, glass or plastic metallised beads and metallised fabrics are all
examples of common materials used. Cathode material selection is largely determined by the
nature of the treatment, which follows the metal deposition. In any case, maximising both the
cathode surface area and the diffusion process are the most important means to enhance the
efficiency of the electrolytic reactor.

Anodic material includes: graphite, lead, lead alloys with antimony, silver or tin, stainless steel,
cast iron, ferro-silicon and the valve metals (titanium, tantalum, tungsten, niobium) coated with
noble metals (platinum iridium) or with noble metal oxides (iridium, ruthenium oxides).

Anodic material selection is usually a compromise based on:

over-voltage behaviour for the particular reaction on a given material
anode corrosion, mechanical properties and the form in which the material is available
price.
Operating conditions vary as a function of the metal to be recovered; for gold the recommended
conditions are: pH minimum of 10, cell voltage 8 V, current density 20 A/dm
2
,
temperature >60 C, and an anode-cathode gap from 8 to 16 cm.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 335
Further advantages of the electrolytic recovery over the ion exchange method are:

it does not produce any increase in the dissolved salt concentration
the presence of other metals in similar concentrations does not affect the rate of removal
of the desired species
may also oxidise unwanted species, such as cyanide

Noble metals, because of their electropositive character, are more readily electrodeposited than
non-noble ones.

For electrolytic metal recovery, the following streams are particularly suitable:

rinsing (drag-out) concentrates from electroplating metal
rinsing (drag-out) concentrates and used process solutions from chemical metal plating
excluding solutions-containing phosphate
sulphuric acid regenerates of cation exchangers from the treatment of rinsing waters:
these contain non-ferrous metals.

The purity of the generated metals may permit a direct in-house use as an anode material,
otherwise re-use is via the scrap metal trade.

Applicability
Gold and silver have been recovered electrolytically for well over 50 years.
Electrolytic recovery has wider applicability than precious metals: it can also be used for
transition metals, see reference plants in Annex 8.5 and Example plants, below.
Fluidised bed cells increase the process efficiency.

Economics
Cost-effective for precious metals.
Can be cost-effective for transition metals, for example, where it reduces the waste water
treatment costs (capital and running costs).

In-house electrolysis has costs in investments and personnel (both time and skills) as well as a
substantial energy expenditure because of the low electricity yield (kg/amp hour). This may be
offset for cyanide solutions where the cyanide is destroyed in parallel.

For a- fluidised bed cell: although the technique can be utilised on most metals, economic
considerations limit the application to either valuable or easily re-usable metals. Units can
recover from 1 kg/week to 150 kg/week of electrolytically pure metal from solution. The
solutions can be very dilute, typically containing 100 500 parts per million (0.1 0.5 gm/l).
Typical costs are shown in Table 4.17.

Nominal
capacity
Capital cost
GBP
Typical operating
cost/yr GBP
<1.5 kg/week 6500 <10
<5 kg/week 14000 115
<30 kg/week 24000 300
<150 kg/week 68000 800
Table 4.17: Typical capital and operating costs for a fluidised bed electrolytic cell

Driving force for implementation
See Economics, above.
Water pollution protection legislation and PARCOM.

Chapter 4
336 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Example plants
For nickel and chromium: Townrow (Hi-Tech Plating) Ltd, Sheffield, UK.

Gold, silver, rhodium, nickel, copper recovery; cyanide destruction; and water re-use:
Marigot Jewellery (Thailand), Samutprakarn 10280, Thailand.

Copper Recovery (Printed Circuit Manufacturer): P.W. Circuits Ltd. South Wigton, UK.

Silver recovery from waste photographic solutions: Shannon Environmental Services Ltd.,
Shannon, Republic of Ireland.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 18, Tempany, 2002] [110, BEWT, 2003] [12, PARCOM, 1992]

4.12.2 Ion exchange recovery of precious metals from rinses

Description
Precious metals in concentrated solutions are usually recovered electrolytically (see Section
4.12.1), while more dilute solutions, sometimes of no more than a few mg/litre, are treated by
adsorption of the metal content on ion exchange resins.

Ion exchange provides only a concentration of the metal in the resin, the subsequent recovery
being possible by incineration of the resin or by releasing the metal in dissolved form, but at
higher concentration. The final metal recovery by incineration is in an oxygen-rich atmosphere
at 500 600 C; metals are found with the residual ash. Recovery is about 95 % efficient.
Achieved environmental benefits
Recovery of precious metals.

Cross-media effects
Emissions from incineration of the resin.
Increased salt concentrations in resin regeneration.

Operational data
For gold and precious metals, the principle of the method is based on treating the rinse-water
with a strong basic type of anionic ion exchange resins, in the OH
-
or in the Cl
-
form. This does
not work well for alkaline cyanide or chloride-based rinses. Ion exchange resins are quoted as
having a useful capacity of 100 g of gold per litre of resin.

Typically the equipment consists of two ion exchange resin columns in series, with the first unit
taking the main load, while the downstream column takes any excess. Each resin column needs
to contain around four litres or more of ion exchange resin to be effective.

When very large volumes of rinse-water are used, an option is the treatment of the static rinse
which workpieces pass through after the precious metal plating tank. The treatment is through a
closed loop resin column. This ensures such a low gold concentration in the static rinse that
further drag-out losses into the following cascade rinses may be neglected.

Silver recovery requires using weak basic anionic ion exchange resins, followed by regeneration
and subsequent electrolytic recovery of the regenerate. Typically the resin capacity is in the
range of 50 75 g of Ag/litre (silver per litre) of resin. A further option is the use of ion
exchange units built into a recirculation rinse loop with periodical regeneration. Precious metal
is then recovered by electrolysis from the concentrate. This has been successfully used for
silver.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 337
Palladium used in the PCB industry is recovered from acid solutions containing chloride (pH
about 2), where it is present as a chloro-complex, using strongly basic ion exchange resins. The
same process readily allows its separation from copper. The typical resin capacity (the same
type of resin as used for gold) varies from 30 to 50 g of Pd per litre of resin.

Driving force for implementation
Cost recovery.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002]

4.12.3 Chromating

Description
The hexavalent chromium in chromating solutions is exhausted after a certain time. The
solutions also dissolve and accumulate zinc and other metals and eventually lose their
workability, and must then be rejected and renewed.

Numerous attempts have been made to regenerate chromating solutions, predominantly via ion
exchangers or via diaphragm technology.

Achieved environmental benefits
Extended bath life and recovery of metal.

Cross-media effects
Energy and chemicals used in regeneration techniques.

Economics
Regeneration is usually only cost-effective with relatively concentrated and expensive solutions,
for example, black chromating solutions containing silver.

New yellow chromating process solutions for zinc only costs EUR 3 to 4/100 litre (2002). This
makes it difficult to recover the costs of capital, the energy expenditure and maintenance for the
recovery measures.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003]

4.12.4 Precipitation

See Sections 4.16 and 4.17.

4.13 Post-treatment activities techniques relevant to the
determination of BAT

4.13.1 Drying

Options exist such as hot water drying, hot air, air knives. (No further data given).

Chapter 4
338 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.13.2 De-embrittlement

Description
De-embrittlement is heat treatment carried out after certain processes to avoid the unwanted
embrittlement caused by hydrogen being trapped in the crystalline structure of metal substrates.
This occurs in pickling, cathodic cleaning, or the electrodeposition of metal where the current
efficiency is less than 100 %, or by chemical deposition (phosphating). The temperature and
time of the embrittlement process depends on the substrate.

Achieved environmental benefits

Cross-media effects
High energy consumption in heating.

Driving force for implementation
Work piece or substrate finish specifications.

Reference literature
[159, TWG, 2004]

4.14 Continuous coil large scale steel coil

Many of the possible best available techniques used are described elsewhere in this document
and cross-referenced. The techniques described in detail here are of particular relevance to coil
coating and/or add specific information [19, Eurofer, 2003]. Costs given are per tonne
processed.

4.14.1 Using digital process control

Description
Digital process control systems collect data and react on the processes in real time. See Section
4.1.5.

Achieved environmental benefits
Improved plant efficiency and product quality as well as lowering the emissions.

Cross-media effects
No

Applicability
New and existing plants

Economics
Initial investment is high: EUR >0.8/t installed, with high operating and maintenance costs of
EUR >0.8/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency and quality requirements.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating lines in EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 339
4.14.2 Oil tight trays

Description
Leakage from hydraulic systems to soils, surface and groundwater is prevented through use of
oil tight trays.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimises the possible release of oil to land and water.

Applicability
New and existing plants

Cross -media effects
None.

Operational data
Improves operator health and safety, by reducing slippage on oily floors.

Economics
Initial investment is low EUR 0.001 0.15/tonne installed, with low operating costs 0.001
EUR 0.15/tonne installed.

Driving Force for Implementation
Process efficiency.
Health and safety.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating lines in EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.3 Energy efficiency

4.14.3.1 Energy efficient motors

Description
See Section 4.4. the application of energy efficient motors where motors are used in the process.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction in energy consumption on the line.

Cross-media effects
None

Applicability
Can be used in new plant or as replacement parts

Economics
The initial investment is medium: EUR 0.015 0.8/t installed.
Operating costs are low EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency.

Chapter 4
340 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Example plants
Many continuous electroplating lines in EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.3.2 Raising the conductivity of the electrolyte

See Section 4.4.1.4.

4.14.4 Water efficiency

4.14.4.1 Re-cycling of quench waters

Description
To produce a bright finish on the product following flow melting in tin plating, the strip is
cooled via a water quench. This water is recycled and re-used until it is disposed of when there
is too high a build-up of tin. See Section 4.4.5.

Applicability
To new and existing plants.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed, along with operating costs of EUR
0.015 to 0.8/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process quality and customer requirements

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating lines in EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.4.2 Use of cascade rinse systems

See Sections 2.9.10.4 and 4.7.10. The first spray water is recycled back to the initial stages.

Achieved environmental benefits
Significant reduction in water consumption within the process, with a commensurate reduction
in waste water volumes and treatment

Applicability
To new and existing plants for rinsing.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed with an operating and maintenance cost of
EUR >0.8/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 341
4.14.5 Squeeze rolls

Description
See drag-out reduction, Section 4.6. The remaining solutions or rinse-waters on the steel strip
are removed from the strip by squeeze rolls before leaving each section. This ensures that the
drag out of solution into the next section is minimised as is the loss of chemicals and
contamination of rinse-waters.

Achieved environmental benefits
There is significant reduction of raw material consumption. This then reduces the rinsing water
needed and the waste water volumes. There is a consequent reduction in treatment chemicals
and sludge produced at the waste water treatment plant.

Cross-media effects
No negative effects.

Operational data
See emissions from the process, waste sludge, water usage and raw material usage, in Section
3.4.1.

Applicability
To new and existing plants after the plating section and passivation sections

Economics
The initial investment is moderate at about EUR >0.015 - 0.8/t installed and the operating costs
are low, at about EUR 0.001 - 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency including cost and quality.

Reference data
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.6 Electrolytic strip cleaning

See Section 4.9.14.8.

4.14.7 Use of ultrafiltration systems to regenerate degreasing solution

See Section 4.11.13.6

4.14.8 Cascade (multiple) use of degreasing solutions

See Section 4.11.13.1.

4.14.9 Control of the acid bath in the pickling section

See Sections 4.8.1and 4.11.14.

Chapter 4
342 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.14.10 Control and management of electrolyte consumption

Description
See Sections 4.7.2 and 4.7.5.
For tin plating: Following the plating section, the strip passes through a rinse section drag-out.
To minimise the loss of electrolyte, the electrolyte is spray rinsed with a dilute solution of PSA
and tin, it is then returned to an electrolyte recirculation tank. An evaporator system is then used
to condense the dilute electrolyte solution through evaporation, and then returned to the process
for re-use.

For acid zinc plating: An evaporator in a closed loop with a scrubber (for the plating cells) as
with the zinc electrolyte tanks and the plating rinse cells, concentrates the ions (Zn
++
, SO
4
--
) in
the residue and produces distilled water from the steam. The concentrated ions are re-used and
injected into the electrolyte while the distilled water is re-used and injected into the different
processes.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of raw material consumption as the electrolyte is re-used. Reduction of waste water
volumes and sludge from the waste water treatment plant.

Cross-media effects
None.

Operational data
See emissions from the process, waste sludge, water usage and raw material usage, Sections
3.4.1 and 3.4.2

Applicability
To new and existing plants.

Economics
For tin: Initial investment is EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed with operating and maintenance costs
of EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t.

For zinc: The initial investment is EUR >0.8/t installed, with EUR 0.015 to >0.8/t for operating
and maintenance costs.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency and product quality.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants in the EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.11 Switching the polarisation of the electrodes in the electrolytic
processes

See Section 4.8.3.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 343
4.14.12 Optimisation of the anode-cathode gap

Description
A mechanism of adjusting the gap as a function of the processed strip to be processed (width-
thickness-flatness).

Achieved environmental benefits
Optimisation of the energy consumption, reduction of the contacts between anode and strip
surface, increasing quality and cutting strip rejections.

Cross-media effects
None

Applicability
To new lines.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t installed with operating and maintenance costs of
EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency, reduced energy consumption.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants in the EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.13 Polishing the conductor roll

Description
Oscillating abrasive blades continuously polish the conductor rolls surface avoiding zinc and or
nickel build-up.

Achieved environmental benefits
Longer conductor roll lifetime, longer processing time, minimisation of strip surface defects.

Cross-media effects
None.

Operational data

Applicability
To new and existing lines.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed, with operating and maintenance costs of
EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Productivity, conductor rolls lifetime, plated strip yield and quality.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants in the EU-15

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]
Chapter 4
344 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.14.14 Using edge polishers

Description
Removal of zinc dendrites formed at the strip edges in zinc electroplating cells equipped with
low anode-cathode gaps.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimisation of strip surface defects (dents).

Cross-media effects
Material losses.

Operational data

Applicability
To new and existing lines in the EU-15.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t installed, with operating and maintenance costs of
EUR 0.001 to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Plated strip yield and quality to customers requirements.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.15 Using edge masks

Description
Edge masks move between the anode and the strip to avoid zinc dendrites and zinc overthrow
(when plating one side only) at the strip edges.

Achieved environmental benefits
Environmental benefit low.
Avoids side trimming (material loss), minimisation of strip surface defects.

Cross-media effects
None.

Applicability
To new lines and existing lines if the anode-cathode gap is wide enough.

Economics
The initial investment is medium, with medium operating and maintenance costs.

Driving force for implementation
Plated strip yield and quality.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants use this technique in the EU-15.
Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 345
4.14.16 Minimise use of oil by covered electrostatic oilers

Description
A light oil (anticorrosion or deep drawing oil) is heated and electrostatically deposited on the
surface. The oil layer weight lies within a narrow range. The machine is covered and the
splashed oil is collected and re-used. Electrostatic application is a more efficient and effective
method of coating to minimise the amount of oil used within the system.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of raw material consumption, minimises waste and oil fume emissions.

Applicability
To new plants and existing plants if space is available.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR >0.8/t installed with EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t operating costs.

Driving force for implementation
Primarily customer requirements, then process efficiency.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.17 Maintenance of process solutions

See Section 4.11. where specific examples of applications for coil coating are described.

4.14.17.1 Cleaning and recirculation of degreasing baths

Description
See Section 4.11.13.
Spent degreasing solution is cleaned; the oil residues out of the regeneration devices are
recovered for heat recovery; the treated degreasing bath is recycled within the degreasing
section.

Achieved environmental benefits
Significant reduction of alkaline chemical consumption, reduction of water and sludge volumes
in the waste water treatment plant.

Cross-media effects
Increases section energy consumption.

Applicability
To new and existing plant, if space is available.

Economics
The investment costs are EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed and operating costs are EUR 0.001 to
0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency primarily.

Chapter 4
346 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Example plants
In several continuous electroplating lines in the EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.17.2 Continuous filtering and re-use of the zinc bath

Description
By-pass mechanical filtering for bath regeneration and internal recycling is used for cleaning
zinc baths.

Achieved environmental benefits
Environmental benefit are medium.
Reduces materials input (Zn, H
2
SO
4
), water consumption, waste water and sludge releases.

Cross-media effects
Low amount of energy used for pumping through filters.

Applicability
To new and existing lines if space is available

Economics
The initial investment is medium, with medium operating and maintenance costs.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency, primarily customer requirements.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants in the EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.17.3 Continuous removal of iron and re-use of the zinc bath

Description
The electrolyte is circulated through an off-line tank and treated with H
2
O
2
to oxidise Fe(II) into
Fe(III). The Fe(OH)
3
is collected either by precipitation or by an ion exchanger.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduces materials input (Zn, H
2
SO
4
), water consumptions, waste water and sludge releases,
reduces strip defects.

Cross-media effects
None.

Applicability
To new and existing lines, if space is available.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed, with EUR 0.015 to for 0.8/t operating and
maintenance costs.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 347
Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency, primarily customer requirements.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants in the EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.17.4 Cleaning and regeneration of the phosphate bath

See Section 4.11.12

4.14.17.5 Cleaning and regeneration of the chromate bath

Description
See techniques given in Section 4.11. Spent chromate bath is filtered; the concentrations in
metallic ions and the pH are adjusted. The regenerated chromate solution is re-used.

Achieved environmental benefits
Environmental benefit is high: reduces chemicals consumption, reduces water and sludge
releases

Cross-media effects
Depends on regeneration techniques used.

Operational data

Applicability
To new and existing plants, if space is available

Economics
The investment costs are EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed and operating costs are EUR 0.001
to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency primarily.

Example plants
Several continuous electroplating lines

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

Chapter 4
348 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.14.18 Control of emissions to air

4.14.18.1 Collection and scrubbing

Description
See Section 2.13.3. For coil processing, to maintain occupational health standards within the
workplace, air can be extracted from cleaning, pickling, plating and chemical treatment sections.
A scrubber system using wet scrubbers and demisters is used to remove contaminants.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction in emissions to air.

Cross-media effects
Increase in energy consumption. Increase in the amount of waste water s requiring treatment.

Operational data available/if applicable
See emissions from the process, waste sludge, and water usage, in Section 3.4.1.

Applicability
To new and existing plants.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR >0.8/t installed, with operating and maintenance costs of
EUR >0.8/t.

Driving force for implementation
Workplace environmental and health and safety legislation.
Avoids deterioration of installations and buildings through corrosion.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating plants in EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.18.2 Covered treatment baths

Description
See Section 4.18.2. It is good practice to cover all tanks excluding those with fume exhausts. All
chemical treatment and rinse baths (degreasing, pickling, plating, chromating) are covered and
are at negative pressure to avoid emissions of fumes and aggressive waste air.

Achieved environmental benefits
Environmental benefit high. Reduction of fugitive emissions to air.

Cross-media effects
None.

Applicability
To new and existing plants.

Operational data
There are practical difficulties in some applications, such as space, access for maintenance, etc.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 349
Economics
The initial investment is EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed with maintenance requirements at EUR
0.001 to 0.15/t.

Driving force for implementation
Workplace environmental conditions, health and safety legislation.

Example plants
Many continuous electroplating lines in the EU-15.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.14.19 Waste water treatment processes

See Section 4.16 for a description and discussion of techniques. For coil coating, investment
costs are EUR >0.8/t installed, with operating costs of EUR >0.8/t.

4.14.20 Recovery of residual metals from tanks

Description
The tin from the recirculation tanks can be recovered through treatment of the waste waters by
precipitation using lime and then reprocessing by a metal reprocessor.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction in waste to landfill and recovery of the raw material.

Cross-media effects
Lime used in the process.

Applicability
To new and existing plants.

Economics
The initial investment is EUR 0.015 to 0.8/t installed along with maintenance costs of EUR
0.015 to 0.8/t.

Driving force for implementation
Process efficiency and reduction in waste disposal costs

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003]

4.15 Printed circuit board processing

Many of the techniques used in PCB manufacture are described elsewhere in this document and
are cross-referenced. Information can be also be found in the reference literature quoted.

Chapter 4
350 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.15.1 Manufacture of inner layers

Description
Section 2.11.2.6 describes the black and brown oxide processes, and refers to newer processes.
The black oxide is produced using chemicals such as sodium hypochlorite at high temperatures
(approximately 80 C). This is increasingly being replaced by the brown oxide process, which
uses less hazardous chemicals such as sulphuric acid, hydrogen peroxide and organic additives
which are biodegradable at temperatures of approximately 30 C. The elementary copper is
oxidised to copper (I) and preserved by additives.

However, other processes are now emerging (sometimes referred to as oxide alternative
treatments). Developments of these processes are rapid and driven by ever-increasing higher
technical requirements

Achieved environmental benefits
Use of less hazardous chemicals.
Lower temperatures.
Less waste water is produced (see Operational data, below).

Cross-media effects
When a new solution is made (which becomes necessary every 24 months), the used solution is
treated in a batch process by alkaline precipitation.

The acidic exhaust air is neutralised by an air scrubber.
Operational data
The concentration of the individual components is kept at a constant level by replenishing
chemicals depending on the production volume. This replenishment equalises the loss of liquid
which occurs by evaporation. Thus, hardly any effluents are generated.

Driving force for implementation
Product quality.
Workplace health and safety.

Example plants
Major PCB producers in Germany use the brown oxide technique.
Alternative techniques are used in Finland.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003], [159, TWG, 2004]

4.15.2 Rinsing between steps

See Sections 4.6 and 4.7. PCBs are usually operated in horizontal in-line modules, but the same
techniques are applicable as for the other processes. In addition, squeeze rollers are used for
PCBs which greatly assist with the prevention of drag-in and drag-out.

4.15.3 Electroless (autocatalytic) plating

See other solution maintenance techniques in Sections 4.7, 4.9.1, 4.11. For EDTA treatment see
Section 4.16.8.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 351
4.15.4 Electroplating PCBs

Description
See the general issues applicable to electroplating in the Sections 4.5 to 4.11. In order to obtain
a metal deposition as even as possible for PCBs it is state of the art in vertical installations to
use direct air injection, combined with oscillation- and vibration of the boards.. In addition, the
panel is fixed in the lower part of the bath so that an optimum exchange of electrolytes inside
the holes is possible across the whole panel (usually 600 x 600 mm). The individual baths
(micro etching, acid dipping, electroplating and rinsing) are served by automatic carriers.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimisation of rejects.

Cross-media effects
See agitation, Section 4.3.4

Driving force for implementation
Production quality.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003]

4.15.5 Development of dry resist by sodium carbonate

Description
The equipment for the development of dry resist consists of the development unit and a smaller
downstream chamber which contains a fresh solution of sodium carbonate (see Section 2.11.2.8)

In order to reduce the drag-out of contaminated developer solution into the following fresh
water rinsing zones, the panel surface is rinsed with clean developer solution.

The manifolds are equipped with an oscillation to bridge the mechanical effect of the spray
nozzles and a better exchange of solution. The fan jet nozzles are to be installed at an angle of
approximately 30 - 40 transverse to the direction of process. In the case of multiple nozzle bars
these may be installed against each other. This step uses water and chemicals economically

It is good practice to control the concentration of the developer solution (0.8 1.0 % Na
2
CO
3
)
by conductivity, to check by laboratory analysis and to replenish it when necessary by adding
fresh solution. Used solution is collected as effluent in a buffer vat; fresh solution is added from
a sodium carbonate mixer (containing 10 % soda) and the following rinsing cascade as per
requirement.

It is good practice to separately treat the effluents that are loaded with resist. There are various
treatments are available for this, such as ultrafiltration.

Achieved environmental benefits
Minimises chemical and water usage.
Minimises the effect of batch discharging to the waste water treatment plant

Applicability
All dry resist developers.

Economics
The use of ultrafiltration for the effluent may depend on the amount of water discharged.
Ultrafiltration is reported to be cheaper than precipitation.

Chapter 4
352 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Example plants
Schweizer Electronic AG, Ruwel AG, Germany.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003]

4.15.6 Etching

Description
See Section 2.11.2.9. It is good practice to monitor acidic etchant (HCl + H
2
0
2
) online. The
concentration of hydrochloric acid is determined via a titrator and replenished if necessary. The
redox potential can also be monitored via a redox electrode and the hydrogen peroxide
replenished.

Alkaline etching is conducted in a horizontal production line equipped with oscillation and
special nozzles for an effective removal of copper. The solution is initiated by incorporating
some etched copper. This solution is replenished continuously. The replenisher solution
contains, among other substances, ammonium salts (chloride, sulphate, carbonates). By using
ammonia the solution is adjusted to a pH level of 8 9.5.

After the etching process it is good practice to recirculate the rinsing water of the first cascade
into the etching solution. The etching parameters are kept at a constant level as far as possible
by continuously controlling and replenishing the solution with regeneration chemicals. Part of
the solution is continuously discharged from the etching equipment. The copper (II) chloride
waste solution resulting from the etching process is collected in a storage tank and is
reconditioned externally by specialised companies into copper salts and hydrochloric acid.
These basic materials can be fed into industrial processes again.

Acidic exhaust fumes may be removed via an air scrubber filled with an alkaline solution
(NaOH) for neutralisation.

Achieved environmental benefits
Optimisation of chemicals usage and minimisation of water usage.
Recovery of copper and etchants from the used solutions.

Cross-media effects
Transport, storage and handling of waste solutions.
Alkali air scrubber solutions can be treated in a typical waste water treatment plant

Applicability
To all etching systems.

Driving force for implementation
Product quality.
Workplace air quality standards.

Example plants
All major PCB manufacturers.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 353
4.15.7 Recycling of alkali etchants online with copper recovery (liquid-
liquid ion-exchange)

Description
The alkaline ammonia etching solution can be regenerated and the dissolved copper can be
recovered on-site by a commercially available process. The patented unit is installed in a closed
loop within an alkaline etching system shown in Figure 4.31 and achieves the following
functions:

continual regeneration of the alkaline etchant bath
uninterrupted recovery of the etchant copper in high purity form.
purification of the rinsing water for re-use after etching.

Used etchant with 150 g/l of copper is passed through the first immiscible organic liquid
extraction solution (in the Recycling equipment, see Figure 4.31) and is returned as regenerated
etchant with 110 g/l of copper. The solvent is now loaded with 50 g/l of copper.

Spent rinse-water with 5 g/l (5000 mg/l) of copper goes through a second immiscible organic
liquid extraction solution (in the Recycling equipment, see Figure 4.31) and comes out as
regenerated rinse-water with 5 6 mg/l of copper. The immiscible organic liquid from this
second extraction is loaded with an additional 5 g/l of copper.

The immiscible organic liquid is passed through a third extractor containing water-based
electrolyte, has its copper load removed, and is returned to the first extractor. After the third
extractor, the electrolyte is loaded with approximately 55 g/l of copper.

The copper is plated from the electrolyte onto the cathode in the electrowinning (electrolytic)
cell.

Description of chemistry

For etching metallic copper from printed circuit boards:

Cu + Cu(NH
3
)
4
Cl
2
Y2 Cu(NH
3
)
2
Cl (dissolution)

2 Cu(NH
3
)
2
Cl + 0.5O
2
+ 2 NH
3
+ 2 NH
4
Cl Y2 Cu(NH
3
)
4
Cl
2
+ H
2
O (oxidation)

In summary:

Cu + 2 NH
3
+ 2 NH
4
Cl + 0.5 O
2
YCu(NH
3
)
4
Cl
2
+ H
2
O
For extracting copper from spent etchant and used rinse-water (where R represents the molecule
in the immiscible organic liquid extraction solution):

Cu(NH
3
)
4
Cl
2
+ 2 RH (org) YCuR
2
(org) + 2 NH
3
+ 2 NH
4
Cl

For extracting copper from the organic liquid to the electrolyte:

CuR
2
(org) + H
2
SO
4
YCuSO
4
+ 2 RH (org)

For electrowinning copper metal from the electrolyte:
CuSO
4
+ H
2
O YCu + H
2
SO
4
+ 0.5 O
2
Chapter 4
354 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Spent
etchant
buffer
Regenerated
etchant
buffer
100 g/l Cu
150 g/l Cu
Recycling
equipment
3 to 5 g/l Cu
5 ppm Cu
Alkaline etching
equipment
Old replenisher
modified in rinse
Cascade rinse
Water
NH
4
Cl
Proprietary accelerator
NH
4
OH
Spent rinse
water buffer
Deionised
water
50 l/h
Regenerated
rinse water
buffer
Carbon
filter
Ion
exchange
resin
50 l/h O ppm Cu to
waste treatment
Addition of pH meter and density unit
Figure 4.31: Recycling of alkali etchant in printed circuit board manufacture
[49, France, 2003]
Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of ammonia and copper in the effluent.
Recovery of about 600 kg high quality copper per month (in example plant).
Decreased noise to local residential property from delivery and disposal vehicles.

Cross-media effects
Some additional power consumption for the unit.
The copper recovered is too high purity to re-use in-plant and is sold to a supplier.

Operational data
The equipment must be maintained by a skilled operator

Applicability
Alkali copper etchants.
Patented process.

Economics
Investment of EUR 100000 to 150000 (year 2003).
Payback: more than three years cost recovery from the resale of high quality copper, reduced
effluent treatment and cost of replenishing etchant solution.

Driving force for implementation
Improved production quality of the printed circuit boards due to:

constant etchant strength which allows constant speed through the etching process
less handling problems of hazardous chemicals in delivery and disposal
reduction of replenisher addition
less tanker deliveries, with decreased noise.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 355
Other advantages:

no storage of spent etchant
no transport and delivery of etchant solutions, reducing handling risks, etc.
reduced noise and improved public perception of operation in neighbouring residential
area.

Example plants
SOFRA-PCB, Mennecy, France.

Reference literature
[49, France, 2003]

4.15.8 Resist stripping

Description
The cured dry resist is removed by either a proprietary solution or sodium hydroxide solution
(approximately 20 ml/l), see Section 2.11.2.8. When this solution is sprayed onto the resist it
swells and comes off as flakes. The coarse particles may be separated by a centrifuge and
disposed of as waste. The effluent, which is loaded with resist, may be discharged either directly
or via a buffer vat into ultrafiltration equipment and cleaned with final pH adjustment.

Achieved environmental benefits
Removal of solids from waste water.

Cross-media effects
Resist waste generated.

Applicability
To all resist stripping in PCB installations, but see Economics, below.

Economics
Cost of centrifuging and ultrafiltration.

Driving force for implementation
Waste water policy and legislation.

Example plants
Many PCB plants in Germany.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003], [12, PARCOM, 1992]

4.15.9 Stripping of etch (tin) resist

Description
In horizontal production lines, an acidic medium containing nitric acid is applied by spray for
stripping the etch resist (see Section 2.11.2.10). Organic complexing agents are present which
require additional steps for the disposal of effluents. The rinsing waters and the concentrate
have to be collected separately and treated with an organosulphide compound. The precipitate
can be sent for recycling as a tin-rich sludge. The used concentrates may be disposed of
externally.

Chapter 4
356 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Achieved environmental benefits
Separate treatment enables waste water treatment prior to discharge.
The tin may be recovered from the sludge produced.

Cross-media effects
Use of additional treatment chemicals.

Applicability
To all etch resist processes.

Driving force for implementation
Waste water policy and legislation.

Example plants
Most PCB plants in Germany.

Reference literature
[12, PARCOM, 1992, 122, UBA, 2003]

4.15.10 Disposal of solutions

Description
Certain process baths usually contain strong complexing agents, for example:

immersion or direct plating, see (e.g. copper, nickel, precious metals)
black or brown oxide

They should be identified (see Section 4.16.1) and require either:

destruction of the complexing agents (which may be on-site or off-site) prior to
treatment of the metals (see Section 4.16.8)
disposal off-site (with and without recovery, see Section 4.17).

Achieved environmental benefits
Avoids disruption of the waste water treatment system

Cross-media effects
Increased waste production.

Applicability
All direct plating solutions.

Example plants
Most major PCB producers in Germany and Finland.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003] [159, TWG, 2004]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 357
4.15.11 Solvent emissions from the application of solder mask

Description
The solder masks used consist of epoxy and acrylate resins. They contain photo-initiators and
fillers. Increasingly, aqueous alkaline lacquer systems are used. Prior to exposure, they are
soluble in aqueous alkaline solutions; and are developed in a 1 3 % solution of sodium
carbonate. The effluent may be treated by ultrafiltration or by a precipitation method using an
acidic medium and then disposed of.

However, even aqueous alkaline solder masks contain up to 50 % solvents (i.e. methoxypropyl
acetate). Consequently, installations with an annual consumption of solvents of 5 15 t/yr.
(threshold value) are subject to the Solvent Emissions Directive (SED) In order to stay below
the emission limit values, the PCB manufacturer either has to persuade his supplier to increase
the percentage of solid contents within the lacquer system or has to install suitable treatment
systems to the air extraction systems (e.g. condensation, incineration, biological filters).

Achieved environmental benefits
The reduction of VOC emissions.

Cross-media effects
Increased power consumption for additional equipment.

Applicability
To all solder mask applications, especially those within the SED limits.

Economics
The cost of additional air treatment systems.

Driving force for implementation
Solvent Emissions Directive [97, EC, 1999].

Example plants

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003]

4.16 Waste water emission abatement techniques

The bulk of emissions to the environment from an installation for the surface treatment of
metals and plastics occur to water, see Section 1.4.2. Minimisation (including minimisation
spillages), recycling and re-use are important issues for the management of waste waters [13,
UNEP, et al., 2002] and are dealt with in Sections 4.4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.

Waste water treatment is described extensively elsewhere, such as generally in the BREF on
waste water/waste gas systems [87, EIPPCB, ], and specifically for this sector [6, IHOBE, 1997,
21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002]. The following sections are therefore a brief
description of relevant techniques.

Process waters are usually treated in a waste water treatment plant with a sequence of process
steps, see Section 2.13.1, which also illustrates a typical waste water treatment plant (Figure
2.42).

Chapter 4
358 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.16.1 Identification of problem flows

Description
Changes in sources or types of process chemicals can create problems in waste water treatment,
by unknowingly introducing chemicals that interfere with the process treatments. They are
usually either surfactants that interfere with flocculation and/or settlement processes, or
complexing agents that prevent metals precipitating. They can be tested prior to their
introduction into production.

Achieved environmental benefits
Consistency of waste water treatment to required levels.

Cross-media effects
None.

Operational data
Changes in sources or types of process chemicals can be tested for simply, by mixing samples
of the usual waste water (taken prior to settlement, but after pH adjustment and flocculation)
with expected dilutions of the new chemicals and checking for any detrimental effects, such as
poor settlement of solids, higher than usual metals levels in the supernatant liquid, etc. If any
problems are identified, then either:

the new solution is rejected
the waste water treatment system is changed to compensate.

Applicability
All changes of source or type of process chemicals (usually mixtures and/or proprietary
chemicals). Does not apply to single substances, such as acids, etc.

Economics
Low cost: only the cost of the relevant analysis.

Driving force for implementation
Cost savings in resolving waste water treatment problems and breaches of permit conditions.

Example plants
Collini GmbH, Austria

Reference literature
(Personal communication, Martin Peter, Collini GmbH) [159, TWG, 2004]

4.16.2 Elimination and/or separation of the individual pollutants at the
point of generation

Description
Some chemicals are most effectively managed by treating them separately before mixing with
other effluents.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 359
Other chemicals such as pickling acids and chemical degreasers, are discharged irregularly and
in large quantities that can exceed the capacity of a continuous-flow treatment plant, and can
cause breaches of permit conditions. They can be managed by:

avoiding bulk discharges (for example, see counterflow pickling, Section 4.11.14.1)
containing in bulk and bleeding to the in-house waste water treatment plant over a
period of time, to stay within the internal treatment plants capacity (Note: it is not good
practice to use this technique to discharge by dilution to the municipal waste water
treatment plant)
containing in bulk and using alkali solutions to neutralise acid solutions (such as alkali
degreasers to neutralise acid pickling solutions)
batch managing and discharging the effluent, see Section 4.16.13
disposing of waste solutions that cannot be successfully treated in the waste water
treatment plant for third party recovery or as wastes (see Section 4.17.3).

In some cases, chemicals may be kept separate to assist with third party recovery, as well as
reducing waste water treatment requirements, such as pickling acids (see Section 4.17.3).

Achieved environmental benefits
For some substances, contaminant treatment and removal is only possible after separate
treatment.

Avoidance of bulk discharges exceeding treatment plant capacity and breach of permit
conditions.

Use of waste alkali solutions (such as degreasers) to neutralise waste acid solutions saving
chemicals.

Cross-media effects
Will be case-dependent.

Operational data
Flows containing cyanide-, nitrite- and chromate must be pretreated separately before being
mixed together or with other waste waters. For example:

nitrites can be oxidised or reduced; both reaction types need a slightly acid solution
(pH 3 4, see Section 4.16.5)
cyanide oxidation must be accomplished in alkaline solution (pH >10, see Section
4.16.4)
chromate reduction takes place at pH values <2.5 (see Section 4.16.6).

In order to limit the use of additional chemicals, acid waste water can be neutralised with
alkaline waste water: they must, however, be free of complexing agents.

Other substances can be managed separately to reduce the amount of contaminant discharged,
and reducing or eliminating the need for further treatment. Examples are the use of
countercurrent rinsing and evaporation to close the materials loop from copper, nickel and
chromium plating, and the use of electrolytic cells with chromium and nickel plating.

Cadmium (and mercury) processes (see Section 2.5.5).are subject to other legislation (see
Annexes 8.1 and 8.3). In Germany, legislation requires that they are separated and treated
according to BAT before mixing with other effluents. A similar approach is taken in the UK.

Applicability
It is good practice to consider every process discharge point whether treatment (or recycling or
re-use) is better carried out on the separated stream, before mixing flows for subsequent
treatment.
Chapter 4
360 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
When using waste alkali flows to neutralise waste acids, additional chemicals may be required
to achieve a suitable pH for discharge through a flocculation system.

Economics
In some specific cases, capital and treatment costs may be significantly reduced by treating
individual waste water streams separately. However, usually the cost for treating separated
streams is higher.

Driving force for implementation
The specific process chemistry will dictate which chemicals may require separation.
Separate treatment streams may be more efficient and cost-effective.

Example plants
Townrow (Hi-Tech) Plating Ltd, Sheffield, UK for countercurrent rinsing and electrolytic
treatment of chromium and nickel drag-out streams.
Merrydale Industries Ltd, Wednesbury, UK for countercurrent rinsing and evaporation closing
the loop for copper, nickel and chromium plating.
Frost Electroplating Co. Ltd, Birmingham, UK, for closing the loop on nickel plating by
four-stage countercurrent rinsing with evaporation.
Metal Colours Ltd, Slough, UK, for countercurrent pickling.
SGI, Plaisir, CIRE Bellegarde, and SOFRA-PCB, Champoreaux, France for the treatment of
separate streams, then bulking for final treatments and settlement.

Reference literature
[18, Tempany, 2002, 156, France, 2003] [12, PARCOM, 1992, 13, UNEP, et al., 2002] [124,
Germany, 2003].

4.16.3 Separation of oils and greases (hydrocarbons) from waste water

Generally the separation of oils and greases is undertaken while managing the degreasing
solutions. In special cases, a de-oiling of raw waste water before the inorganic treatment is
necessary, and the procedures for this application are described in Section 4.11.13.

4.16.4 Cyanide oxidation

Description
Cyanides can be removed from waste water using different procedures:

oxidation with different oxidising agents:
o sodium hypochlorite
o hydrogen peroxide
o oxygen (O
2
)
o ozone (O
3
)
o anodic oxidation (electrolysis), see Section 4.12.1
o potassium monopersulphate.
transfer into insoluble metal complexes (e.g. iron cyanide connections)
removal by ion exchangers
destruction of the cyanide by thermal procedures
radiation-assisted oxidation (oxidising agents and UV radiation)
anodic oxidation.

In practice, the chemical oxidation of cyanide is the most commonly used technique.

Achieved environmental benefits
Destruction of cyanide.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 361
Cross-media effects
Use of chemicals and energy (for thermal, radiation and anodic techniques) and the possible
production of AOX if using hypochlorite.

Operational data
The use of sodium hypochlorite is associated with the formation of organic chlorine
compounds, measured as AOX. For this reason, the replacement of sodium hypochlorite as an
oxidising agent in the cyanide oxidation has been much discussed. However, since none of the
alternatives mentioned show a universal solution for efficient cyanide destruction, the
employment of sodium hypochlorite is still the most used procedure.

Anodic oxidation is a suitable technology for the destruction of cyanide complexes in process
solutions containing cyanide and rinsing waters from zinc and copper plating. The residual
cyanide content attainable with the anodic oxidation is below 0.1 g/l. A limit value of <0.2 mg/l
is achieved by an additional chemical treatment with sodium hypochlorite. Additionally to the
cyanide destruction, the dissolved metals are recovered and can be re-used.

Applicability
Chemical oxidation is widely used. Hydrogen peroxide can readily replace hypochlorite, but the
cost is higher.

Driving force for implementation
Water protection policies and legislation.

Example plants

Reference literature
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002] [12, PARCOM, 1992] [126, Netherlands, 2003]
[113, Austria, 2003] [124, Germany, 2003] [104, UBA, 2003]

4.16.5 Nitrite treatment

Description
Nitrite can be oxidised either to nitrate or reduced to nitrogen. Both reactions take place in weak
acid conditions around pH 4.

Achieved environmental benefits
Destruction of nitrite.

Cross-media effects
Possible AOX formation if hypochlorite is used.

Low pH with high nitrite concentrations can lead to NO
X
formation.

Any excess sodium dithionite can complex with meals ions.

Operational data
For oxidation, H
2
O
2
is normally used. Sodium hypochlorite was used most frequently as a nitrite
oxidising agent, but use is decreasing because of the possibility of associated AOX formation.

The reducing agent is normally amidosulphuric acid. The disadvantage of this reaction relates to
a high sulphate concentration in the waste water. It is also possible to use urea; however, this
has the disadvantage that the reaction needs a temperature of 60 C. It is possible to reduce this
with hydrogen sulphite, but it is not often used as it causes a high concentration of sulphate into
the waste water.

Chapter 4
362 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
In an acid solution, nitrite can easily be reduced using sulphamic acid.

The use of sodium dithionite and Fe (II) would eliminate some cross-media effects.

Air extraction may be necessary as pH lowering with high nitrite concentrations leads to the
formation of nitrous gases. Since nitrous gases by themselves dissolve badly in water, an
exhaust air scrubber with alkali solution may be necessary, although this may not remove all
nitrous gases produced from high concentration solutions. In batch treatment, it may be
necessary to add a small amount of oxidising agent before reducing pH.

Applicability
Widely used.

Driving force for implementation
Water pollution protection legislation.

Reference literature
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002], [104, UBA, 2003], [124, Germany, 2003,
Austria, 2003 #113]

4.16.6 Chromate treatment

Description
Hexavalent chromium compounds (chromates or dichromate) are difficult to precipitate and are
normally reduced to trivalent (chromium (III) ions), which are subsequently precipitated as
chromium (III) hydroxide on neutralisation. The reduction is made at pH values under 2.5. The
most common reducing agent is sodium hydrogen sulphite (bisulphite).

If only a small amount of chromium (VI) is present at high pH values, the reaction can also be
carried out in the alkaline region with sodium dithionite or iron II. No addition of acid is
needed.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction and removal of chromium (VI).

Cross-media effects
Care should be taken with sodium hydrogen sulphite (bisulphite), as SO
x
fumes are formed.
Workplace ventilation may be required.

When using iron (II), more sludge and therefore waste will be generated in the waste water
treatment (as iron (III) hydroxide).

Applicability
Widely used.

Driving force for implementation
Water pollution protection legislation.

Reference literature
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002] [124, Germany, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 363
4.16.7 Flocculation and precipitation of metals

The ultimate process control is by precipitating metals separately (adjusting the pH to its
optimum value for the metal) but this is not possible and economically feasible in many cases. If
there are many processes and process baths, and separation of different waste water streams is
difficult, metals can be precipitated simultaneously (co-precipitation) [120, Finland, 2003]. A
mixture of discharges from processes makes it more difficult to maintain the optimum pH
balance for precipitation for all the dissolved metals.

It is important to note that the total dissolved ion content may also affect the solubility of
metals, and this can be increased by water-saving measures and the discharge of ion-exchange
regeneration solutions. (Personal communication, Ministry of Environment, Slovenia).

The final cleaning of effluent by using chelating cation exchange resin can then be more
efficient. The efficiency of chelating cation exchange resin also depends on the effluent pH. The
optimum pH is different for each metal.

4.16.7.1 Hydroxide precipitation

Description
This is described in Section 2.13.1.7. The removal of the transition metals is made via
neutralisation and then precipitation at pH values of 9 - 11. A water-solid mixture results from
the precipitation, usually referred to as electroplating sludge (dependent on source activities).

Achieved environmental benefits
Removal of transition metals from the effluent.

Operational data
Combining the different waste water streams for precipitation together has the effect that metals
with poor precipitation characteristics are precipitated by those metal hydroxides with good
precipitation characteristic, so it is possible to reach a better result with common precipitation.
For example, nickel co-precipitation with other metal ions, and the co-precipitation of cadmium
and FeII at pH 9. The emission value of cadmium in this case can be lower than 0.1mg/l. If
precipitated separately, it is not possible to achieve such low cadmium levels.

On the other hand, some heavy metals, e.g. cadmium, lead and nickel need a high pH value for
precipitation. Under these conditions, it is possible that other metal hydroxides, e.g. zinc,
chromium, tin and aluminium, will be redissolved, so it may become necessary to have a
separate precipitation at lower pH values with other precipitation agents, such as calcium or
sodium hydroxides

The solubility of the metals increases with increased neutral salt concentrations. The metals
partly precipitate in very fine particles (especially lead and tin), therefore the addition of
flocculating agents (iron (III) chloride, lime) and/or flocculants (polyelectrolyte) are necessary
for better separation and filtration. However, this leads to an increase in the quantity of sludge
(waste) produced as iron compounds and lime need to be added in significant quantities.
Polyelectrolytes have a much higher charge density and need a far lower dose rate.

To meet stringent emission limit values, fine filtration may also be necessary. Sometimes a
post-treatment is also necessary, for example with sulphide and/or selective ion exchangers.

Cadmium may be treated separately (see Section 2.5.5).

Chapter 4
364 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Applicability
Widely used. Settlement tanks need space and may be costly to install.
In all cases, the choice between precipitating separately or co-precipitating metal ions must be
made after tests of treatment have been carried out.

Driving force for implementation
Water protection policy and legislation

Reference literature
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002] [12, PARCOM, 1992] [126, Netherlands, 2003]
[121, France, 2003, 124, Germany, 2003].

4.16.7.2 Sulphide precipitation

Description
If the hydroxide precipitation followed by a post-cleaning stage with selective ion exchangers is
not sufficient to meet limit values for discharge, a precipitation with sodium sulphide or
organosulphide can achieve lower levels, see Table 4.18. Since the solubility of the metal
sulphides is generally substantially lower than that of the metal hydroxides, smaller residual
concentrations can be achieved with sulphide precipitation.

Solubility product (g/l)
Metal Hydroxide Sulphide
Aluminium 2 x 10
-32
--
Lead 1 x 10
-7
to 10
-13
3 x 10
-28

Cadmium 1.3 x 10
-14
5.1 x 10
-29

Chromium (III) 3 x 10
-28
--
Iron (II) 2 x 10
-15
3.7 x 10
-19

Iron (III) 8.7 x 10
-38
--
Copper 2 x 10
-19
8 x 10
-45

Nickel 5.8 x 10
-15
1 x 10
-26

Silver 1.24 x 10
-8
1.6 x 10
-49

Zinc 4 x 10
-17
6.9 x 10
-26

Zinc(II) 6 x 10
-25
1 x 10
-20

Table 4.18: Solubility products of metal hydroxides and sulphides
UBA

Achieved environmental benefits
Low emission values for transition metals.

Cross-media effects
Avoid acid conditions to prevent emission of hydrogen sulphide. Excess sulphide must be
eliminated by using iron salts
Handling of sulphide sludges can be difficult, with finer precipitates giving poor settlement and
filtration properties.

Operational data
The addition of a flocculant is necessary with metal sulphides precipitation as the precipitates
formed, as well as colloidal sulphur, are very fine and neither settle nor are filtered easily.

Economics
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 365
Driving force for implementation
Water protection policy and legislation; low emission values where environmental quality
standards require.

Reference literature
[82, Agences de l'Eau, 1996, 104, UBA, 2003], [113, Austria, 2003], [12, PARCOM, 1992,
Netherlands, 2003 #126].

4.16.7.3 Other flocculating agents

Description
Other flocculation agents are used:

inorganic salts, such as of Fe(III) and aluminium
organic polymers with a high molecular mass (10
6
to 10
7
), an ionic structure (either
anionic or cationic) and a high charge density. For surface treatment industries, anionic
polymers are most often used.

Achieved environmental benefits
Increased flocculation and improved precipitation.

Cross-media effects
Inorganic salts can increase the bulk of material to be disposed of or managed subsequently.
The addition of flocculating agents may assist with subsequent dewatering processes, with no
further additions necessary.

Operational data
Generally mixed in a separate tank and dosed into the flocculating system prior to precipitation.

Applicability
Applicability is readily determined by on-site tests.

Economics
Can increase the efficiency of an existing waste water treatment plant. Low capital and
operational costs.

Driving force for implementation
Water protection policy and legislation; low emission values where environmental quality
standards require.

Reference literature
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002] [12, PARCOM, 1992, Netherlands, 2003 #126]

4.16.8 Complexing agents

Description
Complexing agents used in certain processes make the precipitation of transition metals more
difficult, if they are mixed before treatment with other waste waters.

Copper can be precipitated from complexes by reduction with sodium dithionite, but excess
dithionite mobilises copper from the hydroxide, preventing precipitation and copper is
discharged in the effluent. By using stronger reducing agents, like sodium hypophosphite, other
metals such as nickel and tin can be reduced. The metals are frequently precipitated as sulphides
from hard complexes. Cationic metal complexes with ammonia or amines such as
triethanolamine and Quadrol can be removed with weakly acid cation exchangers (for example,
selective ion exchange resins with iminodiacetate groups). However, treatment with ion
exchangers is not possible in solutions with citrate, EDTA and NTA.
Chapter 4
366 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The most common complexing agents are cyanides, polyphosphates, amines, citric acid, tartaric
acid, gluconic acid, ammonia, NTA, EDTA, and Quadrol.

Using another procedure, all EDTA is destroyed in the presence of UV radiation and hydrogen
peroxide. The copper largely has to be eliminated from the solution by electrolytic separation
prior to using this technique. After the destruction of the Cu/EDTA complex, free copper is
precipitated.

Achieved environmental benefits
This technique ensures that metals are not solubilised and carried into municipal waste water
treatment or re-solubilised in the wider aquatic environment.

Cross-media effects
Additional chemicals and energy consumption, depending on the technique used.

Operational data
Where using complexing agents, particularly strong ones, separation of metals and complexing
agents as far as possible prior to other treatments (such as flocculation and precipitation of the
metal) is advisable.

Driving force for implementation
Water protection policy and legislation; low emission values where local environmental quality
standards requires.

Reference literature
[12, PARCOM, 1992, Netherlands, 2003 #126, 104, UBA, 2003, 113, Austria, 2003]

4.16.9 Precipitation of anions

4.16.9.1 Fluoride precipitation

Description
Free fluoride ions can be precipitated with calcium, for example when neutralising with lime.

Achieved environmental benefits
Meeting fluoride emission standards.

Operational data
Fluoride precipitation can only be carried out quantitatively if least one calcium equivalent is
present for every fluoride equivalent. Otherwise, additional calcium ions must be added, for
example as calcium chloride.
Applicability
Complex fluorides, such as BF
4
, AlF
6
or SiF
6
, cannot be precipitated perfectly with calcium
compounds.

Driving force for implementation
Water pollution protection legislation.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [113, Austria, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 367
4.16.9.2 Phosphate precipitation

Description
It may be necessary to reduce phosphate levels when the effluent is discharged to surface water
or to municipal waste water treatment which does not treat phosphates. A release of 4 kg/day of
phosphorus corresponds to the release from 1000 inhabitants (in the EU-15).

However, when it is required, it is rarely a problem, since sufficient metal ions are nearly
always present in surface treatment waste waters to form insoluble phosphate compounds. If
this is not the case, iron or aluminium compounds can be added. Precipitation can also be
achieved with lime at pH values over 10.

Achieved environmental benefits
Meeting phosphate emission limit values where applicable. Phosphate is a major contributing
factor to eutrophication. The discharge of a few kilos of phosphorus can have a strong impact on
a river according to the size of the receiving flow.

Cross-media effects
Additional chemicals may be required.

Operational data
The precipitation of polyphosphates and phosphonates is difficult. In many cases, it is difficult
to meet the environmental quality standards for total phosphorous (especially when directly
discharging to surface water).

Driving force for implementation
Where water legislation and local environmental quality standards require.

Reference literature
[121, France, 2003] [3, CETS, 2002, 159, TWG, 2004]

4.16.9.3 Sulphate precipitation

Description
Treatment for sulphate is rarely required, although sulphate control may be locally important for
the protection of receiving sewerage systems. Where applicable, discharge limit values are
normally high, about 1000 mg/l, and sulphate is readily precipitated as calcium sulphate.

Achieved environmental benefits
Meeting sulphate emission limit values where applicable, usually for discharge to a foul sewer.

Cross-media effects
The use of additional chemicals
Sulphate precipitation creates more sludge for disposal
Precipitation of sulphate may also cause problems with recycling of sludges, such as the use of
aluminium hydroxide sludge

Operational data
According to its solubility product, calcium sulphate has a solubility of 1404 mg/l as sulphate.
This rises strongly with increasing neutral salt concentration, so that in the presence of 1 val/l
neutral salt (this corresponds to a concentration of approximately 58.5 g/l common salt) the
sulphate only precipitates at concentrations of 5000 mg/l, which corresponds to the solubility of
the calcium sulphate. Different neutral salts have thereby a different influence on the attainable
precipitation.

Chapter 4
368 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Applicability
It is usually not necessary to eliminate sulphate. Corrosion in sewers is caused in anaerobic
conditions by certain bacteria utilising the oxygen in the sulphate and forming sulphuric acid. In
some cases with effluents over 1000 mg/l, it may be better to protect or change the materials
used in the sewerage system to those with more acid resistance, or treat the sewage to maintain
aerobic conditions (such as by dosing with hydrogen peroxide). This will depend on the
materials used in the construction of the sewerage system and the dilution with other waste
water in the municipal sewage plant.

Driving force for implementation
Where water legislation and local environmental quality standards require.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002] [113, Austria, 2003] [118, ESTAL, 2003] [18, Tempany, 2002, Germany, 2003
#124, ESTAL, 2003 #118]

4.16.10 Final treatment prior to discharge

General description
After precipitating the unwanted dissolved materials (principally the metal hydroxides), these
and other materials in suspension are separated from the liquid by one of the following
techniques:

sedimentation (static)
flotation
filtration.

Traditionally, sedimentation has been used, followed by flotation. However, when considering
revamping or updating waste water treatment plants to meet lower emission levels, and
especially in conjunction with other objectives for recycling water and sludges, filtration
techniques are increasingly considered.

The choice of techniques will therefore depend on factors including:

the size and type of particles, including their settling properties
the existing waste water treatment plant
existing or planned changes in production and solutions (see Section 4.7.12)
volume of waste water throughout
the space available.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 369
4.16.10.1 Sedimentation

Description of the three static sedimentation techniques
(1) Sedimentation tanks
Also called sedimentation or flat tanks, upward flow (for centre-fed circular tanks), horizontal
flow (for rectangular tanks) with a scrapper to move sludge to the bottom.

advantages:
o adapted to high flowrates
o easy collection of sludges
o good inertia to changes in effluent quality
disadvantages:
o difficult separation of the hydraulic flow into laminar flows
o large structure (with large area) and sludge removal equipment may be
complicated, therefore high cost
o extraction of sludges can cause turbulence.

(2) Hopper bottom
Also called cylindro-conical or conical. Influent supplied through centre and downwards (but
sufficiently far from the sludge not to affect the accumulated sludge. Steep sides (angle of cone
must be >60 ) therefore no scrapers needed, extracted sequentially.

advantages
o simple design and equipment
o sludge removal is easy, but sludge may accumulate on sloping sides (which can
be overcome by a centrally driven scraper)
o reduced maintenance
disadvantages
o not suitable for high flowrates
o risk of sludge blockages.

(3) Laminar or tube settlers
Sedimentation tank where plates are used to enlarge the sedimentation surface

advantages
o small area, high capacity
disadvantages
o sensitive to the quality of flocculation and to load variations
o sludges produced are not very thick, so a large volume sludge holding tank is
required
o frequent cleaning of the plates is required.

Achieved environmental benefits
Achievement of waste water emission limit values.
Recovery of sludges containing metal
Low energy usage, only pumping to require head (height).

Cross-media effects, Operational data, Applicability
See Descriptions, above

Economics
Site-specific

Driving force for implementation
Required to complete typical waste water treatment plants.

Reference literature
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002, 87, EIPPCB, ]

Chapter 4
370 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.16.10.2 Flotation

Description
Solid particles (or liquid particles such as oil or grease) are combined with air bubbles
producing particle/air clusters which float to the surface of a tank and are removed.

Achieved environmental benefits
Achievement of waste water emission limit values.
Recovery of sludges containing metal.
Possible reduction in anti-foaming agents, surfactants and activated carbon.

Cross-media effects
May require more coagulant than sedimentation.
Higher power consumption than sedimentation.

Operational data
Three methods are used:

vacuum flotation, where air is dissolved at atmospheric pressure followed by a pressure
drop to allow formation of bubbles
induced air flotation, (IAF) where fine bubbles are formed and drawn into the waste
water via an induction device such as a venturi or orifice plate
dissolved air flotation (DAF) where pressurised air is dissolved into the waste water or
part of the waste water and subsequently released as small bubble.

The advantages and disadvantages are:

advantages
o high efficiency
o floatation speed greater than that obtained by static sedimentation, which implies
smaller installations than static sedimentation.
o pre-thickening of sludges.

disadvantages
o requirement for high quality flocculation to guarantee good adhesion of the air
bubbles to the suspended solids
o settings (for pressurisation) require monitoring.

Applicability
See Description above.
New and existing plants.

Economics
Site-specific
Smaller size allows more room for production capacity.

Driving force for implementation
Required to complete typical waste water treatment plant

Example plants
Industria Galvanica Dalla Torre Ermanno e Figli SpA, Fontane di Villaorba, Italy.

Reference literature
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002, 87, EIPPCB, ] (Personal communication, Lorenzo
Dalla Torre)

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 371
4.16.10.3 Filtration

Description
For waste waters (not sludge dewatering) filtration is applied to:

meet to meet emission values lower than can be met by sedimentation or flotation
when considering revamping or updating waste water treatment to meet these lower
values for changes in plant operation.

In conjunction with other objectives for recycling water and sludges

For a list and a summary of applications and references to descriptions of these techniques, see
Section 4.10.

There are two categories of techniques:

(1) Traditional media:
Sand filters, upward or downward flow, by gravity or pressure
Other filter media, such as cellulose (see Section 4.11.1)

(2) Membrane filtering techniques
Tangential filtration: microfiltration and ultrafiltration (see Section 4.11.13.6)

Semi-permeable membranes: nanofiltration and reverse osmosis (see Section 4.7.8.2)

Economics
Site-specific

Driving force for implementation
Lower waste water emission values
Small size of technique
Enables water re-use and recycling.

Reference literature
[21, Agences de l'Eau de France, et al., 2002]

4.16.11 Combining techniques

Typical waste water treatment plants rely on a combination of techniques, see Section 2.13.1and
other sections of 4.16 for descriptions of typical waste water treatment plant.

Newer techniques can be combined for point source applications and combined flows (see
Section 4.7.12)

4.16.12 Zero discharge techniques

Various techniques can be used in conjunction with water minimisation techniques (see
Sections 4.6, 4.7 and Annex 8.5.9) to minimise discharges of all a processing line or an
installation to zero. Note: this is different to closing the loop for one process chemistry within a
line, see Section 4.7.11

Examples of techniques to achieve zero discharge are:

thermal
membrane
ion exchange.
Chapter 4
372 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Description
The individual techniques are described under Sections 4.16.12.1 and 4.16.12.2.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction in all contaminants discharged.
Recovery of cleaned water for application in the process.

Cross-media effects
Energy for thermal techniques, pressure pumps and/or electrical power for membrane
techniques.

Ion exchange resins require the consumption of other ions (Na, Cl, acids, alkali, depending on
the resin type) in the same valency proportions as the ions they absorb.

The techniques can produce wastes that may be more toxic and/or difficult to handle than the
sludges produced from a typical waste water treatment plant.

Applicability
It is generally easy and more environmentally efficient to achieve a closed loop for specific
processes, such as nickel or chromium plating.

Economics
Although costs are site-specific, as zero discharge is approached, the costs for incremental
discharge reductions can increase significantly in proportion to the benefits achieved.

4.16.12.1 Thermal procedures

As well as the classical waste water treatment by chemico-physical procedures, it is possible to
avoid the discharge of waste water completely by the use of evaporation techniques. Instead of
the metal hydroxides, a mixture of water-soluble salts results from evaporation, whose disposal
requires a deposit in a suitable landfill, possibly with solidification.
At present, two basic techniques are available for evaporation of the effluent:

vacuum evaporators with vapour compression and
infrared evaporators at atmospheric pressure.

4.16.12.1.1 Vacuum evaporators with vapour compression

Description
By the use of vacuum evaporators with vapour compression it is possible to lower the energy
demand to an economic level.

Achieved environmental benefits
Zero water discharge can be achieved from an installation or from certain process steps

Cross-media effects
Increased energy usage in evaporation and concentrate drying. Waste produced may be more
difficult to manage than conventional sludges.

Cyanide can be evaporated with the water.

Operational data
The evaporator produces a concentrate which requires an additional drying procedure. Thus the
investment and operating cost rises to an extent where this technology is usually only economic
in exceptional cases.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 373
The water quality produced is very high, with conductivity from 90 mS to 200 ]S.

Applicability
This is only technically possible by the use of a large energy input and high capital plant
investment. There may little or no environmental benefit or requirement to clean a waste water
discharge containing neutral salts (i.e. alkali metal salts, Na, K, Ca) left from traditional
treatments. There are three possible cases:

small effluent quantity: effluent quantity may be drastically reduced by in-plant
measures described in Sections 4.6 and 4.7. The concentration of the soluble contents
then rises accordingly. It may then become difficult to treat the effluent by classical
methods and be difficult to meet strict concentration values for effluent and sewage
regulations. In such a case, evaporation can be more economic than conventional
treatment, despite the energy consumption
ingredients difficult to remove by normal operation complexing agents such as
EDTA are difficult to destroy in the effluent. However, their use is essential for some
processes and specifications. For an installation which relies on using such chemicals,
the complete evaporation of the relevant flows may be the only solution
regulation: an enterprise whose production has no waste water discharge may be free
from, or less subject to, supervision by the environmental regulatory authorities and any
related costs.
Economics
See Operational data.

Driving force for implementation
See Applicability.

Example plants
See Annex 8.5.8 and Annex 8.13.

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003] [124, Germany, 2003, 128, Portugal, 2003].

4.16.12.1.2 Infrared evaporators

Description
The liquid to be evaporated is placed in a conical container. The liquid surface is then warmed
with infrared radiation produced by a gas infrared emitter. Controlled and bubble-free
evaporation is achieved by radiation absorption as the liquid presents an extremely thin layer at
the shallow end. The crystallised solids sink in the residual water because of their higher
specific gravity in the cold layers of the evaporator. The crystal mash formed is discharged via
a valve to a filter bag. The filtered mother liquor is fed back to the evaporator vessel. The water
vapour mixture leaves the evaporator by an extraction system.

Achieved environmental benefits
Zero discharge from all or part of an installation.

Cross-media effects
Increased energy usage in evaporation; the energy consumption of 100 m
3
natural gas per m
3
of
water evaporated is high.

Waste produced may be more difficult to manage than conventional sludges.

Ammonia may be volatilised into the air.
Chapter 4
374 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Operational data
Advantages of this technique:

durable, resistant technology
direct, contact-less heating
clean exhaust gas because of aerosol evaporation
consistent performance with salt solutions, acids and alkalines
fully automatic salt discharge possible
reducing or oxidising atmosphere in the evaporator area as required
no pollution and/or encrustation problems
no additional chemicals needed, for example for cleaning purposes
very high plant throughput availability due to safe continuous operation
Cr(VI) reduction is possible without additional chemicals
evaporating on ammonia solutions without effluent problems
noiseless operation.

Applicability
See Section 4.16.12.1.1.

Economics
Capital costs are likely to be lower than for a typical waste water treatment plant operated to
BAT standards. High running costs, although a combination of infrared evaporator and reverse
osmosis reduces the energy costs

Driving force for implementation
See Applicability.

Reference literature
[124, Germany, 2003] [104, UBA, 2003, 113, Austria, 2003]

4.16.12.2 Membrane technologies with physico-chemical processes

Thermal procedures present advantages when considering the quality of the treatment (allowing
for recycling). However, the investment and operating costs are more significant [55, France,
2003].

The classical waste water treatment by physico-chemical procedures can be improved using
membranes technology. At present, there are two basic technical solutions using membranes:

ultrafiltration, obtaining very low concentrations in metals and organics (e.g. Ni
concentration after treatment by ultrafiltration can be lower than 0.1 mg/l) rather than
with classical physico-chemical treatment, when it is very difficult to reach 0.5 mg/l for
waste water from nickel plating. However, a chemical treatment is necessary before
ultrafiltration, such as hydroxide or sulphide precipitation
combining ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis allowing zero water discharge.

4.16.12.2.1 Treatment using ultrafiltration

Description
The main difference between classical physico-chemical treatment and ultrafiltration treatment
is the use of membranes instead of settling. Some metals in solution may need treatment with
reducing agents before ultrafiltration.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 375
Achieved environmental benefits
Zero water discharge from all or part of an installation when concentration of dissolved products
allows recycling.
No suspended solids.
The concentration of metals is much lower than with the classical procedures.
Increasing the treatment capacity only requires more membrane units.

Cross-media effects
Problems of clogging in relation to membranes which needs different plant management.
Wastes generated from treatment.

Operational data
Uses little space compared with some other techniques.

Applicability
This technique may also be considered for:

very high quality treatment requirement (recycling requirements and strict
environmental quality standards)
medium and large projects, this technique will provide an excellent quality (suspended
solids close to zero, very low metals concentration, reduced COD etc)
an old waste water treatment plant being revamped (for discharge quality and/or
capacity of treatment) implementing ultrafiltration in place of settlement, as it provides
a high quality level of treatment with reduced investment and in reduced space.

This technique is less applicable where there is a low volume to treat or for highly concentrated
waste water (high TDS).

Economics
Important economy on investment and operating cost levels in comparison with thermal
procedures.

Driving force for implementation
See Applicability, above.
Examples plants
About 80 plants have been working for six years in western Europe.

Reference literature
[156, France, 2003]

4.16.12.2.2 Treatment using combination of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis

Description
The treatment in a first step is based on ultrafiltration (see Section 4.16.12.2.1), followed by
reverse osmosis in a second step, see Figure 4.32. This reduces salt and organic concentrations
in order to obtain a very high quality water, permitting recycling for very sensitive uses.

Chapter 4
376 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Ultrafiltration Neutralisation
Reverse
osmosis
Evaporator
Process lines
Residues
Press
filter
Distillate
Off-site hazardous
waste treatment
Concentrate
Residues
Permeate Effluents
Filter cake
Figure 4.32: Treatment using a combination of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis
[55, France, 2003]

Achieved environmental benefits
Zero water discharge.
The technical solution generates two different qualities of water for recycling (medium quality
for secondary functions and high quality for sensitive functions such as final rinsing by spray).
This use of two different qualities of recycled water reduces operating costs.

Cross-media effects
More complex solution (different stages). Not adapted for very small projects or high
concentrations.
Can produce concentrated wastes.

Operational data
Advantages of this technique:

very high level of quality
low investment and operating costs
easy possibility of graduation in the treatment quality (after ultrafiltration or after
reverse osmosis)
possibility of evolution of the treatment capacity
very compact unit (low height and/or small area where these are limiting factors).

Economics
Important reduction for investment and operating costs in comparison with thermal procedures.

Driving force for implementation
See Applicability.

Example plants
Four plants working in France with this technique (the first one since 2001).

Reference literature
[55, France, 2003]

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 377
4.16.13 Monitoring, final control and discharging of waste waters

Prior to discharge, the effluent is checked to ensure it complies with local permit conditions in
line with a monitoring programme, see Annex 8.4, and the BREF on the general principles of
monitoring [91, EIPPCB, ].

Discharge may be:

continuous with:
o continuous online monitoring for key parameters such as pH
o frequent manual checking of key parameters, such as pH, metals, cyanide (as
appropriate to the installations activities)
o a combination of both.
batch discharge with prior checking for key parameters such as pH, metals, cyanide (as
appropriate to the installations activities). This is required in Germany [124, Germany,
2003].

Both options can form part of a management system (see Section 4.1.1) and when the effluent
falls outside of the limit values, action can be initiated. This may be instigated by automatic
alarms with online systems, or manually with manual checking.

Description
It is advisable to design the monitoring programme to ensure that the installation meets its
permit requirements.

Achieved environmental benefits
Meeting permit requirements.

Cross-media effects
For continuous discharges, poorly trained, poorly maintained and/or inspected online systems or
lack of sufficient manual inspection and analytical results can allow the discharge of out-of-
limit effluents.

For batch discharges, poorly trained supervision, or supervision without adequate analytical
results can allow the discharge of out-of-limit effluents.

Operational data
Staff carrying out this function need adequate training supported by adequate analytical
information, whether from online monitoring, spot tests or laboratory results.

Staff carrying out manual monitoring may be easily distracted from completing testing and
inspection.

Online monitoring equipment needs regular maintenance and calibration by appropriately
trained staff.

Applicability
All sites discharging to watercourses or public or central waste water treatment systems.

Economics
Continuous discharge with regular manual inspection may appear cheapest. However, this must
be compared with the risk and costs of breaches in permit conditions.

Online monitoring equipment must be regularly maintained for the same reasons, but may
recover the cost of manual inspections in a relatively short time.
Chapter 4
378 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Batch discharge after testing is expensive in capital investment in tanks sufficient to take a flow
period, or possibly two or more tanks operated in sequence. This also requires inspection and
analysis prior to discharge.

Driving force for implementation
Compliance with environmental legislation.

Example plants
In Germany, all surface treatment plants with effluent operation on a batch basis.
For France, see monitoring, in Annex 8.4.

Reference literature
[124, Germany, 2003] [56, France, 2003, 91, EIPPCB, , 104, UBA, 2003]

4.17 Waste management techniques

4.17.1 Generation and management of waste

Annex IV (point 3) of the IPPC Directive requires the operator to further the recovery and
recycling of substances generated and used the process and of waste, where appropriate.
The rinsing processes in surface treatment installations produce rinse-waters containing
concentrates. In addition to rinse-waters, the following waste waters streams can also contain
metals:

used process solutions from the electrochemical processes (electrolytes)
used process solutions from chemical coating processes
used process solutions from the pre- and post-treatment (cleaning, pickling, phosphating
and chemical conversion)
solutions from separation and regeneration processes, such as ion exchange, retardation,
dialysis, electrolysis
solutions from associated activities, such as exhaust scrubbers and filters, as well as
from plant cleaning.

Generally the solutions and effluents are discharged into the effluent system. The treatment of
the streams containing metal in the system essentially precipitates the dissolved metal ions as
insoluble compounds. Normal precipitation with caustic soda solution and/or lime precipitates
the metals as hydroxides and/or oxide hydrates. Precipitation may also be as carbonates and
sulphides. The sludge produced has a water content of usually over 95 % and is drained by
means of filter presses to about 60 % water content and is disposed of in this form as sludge.

The amount of sludge depends on various processing factors:

contamination of the input material
amount of metal oxides dissolved or eroded from the workpiece/substrate surfaces
discharge of process solution dragged-out by the workpieces/substrate
service lifetime of the process solutions.

That means that the generation of sludge without internal recycling measures is directly
proportional to the drag out and the service lives of the process solutions. Generally, the metal
losses by drag out related to the metal input material lies between 5 and 30 %.

Surface treatment sludge is usually a mixture of metal hydroxides. It contains all non-ferrous
metals used during the process, the workpiece substrate metals iron and aluminium, as well as
calcium, potassium and sodium from the precipitation chemicals.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 379
Depending on the plating process, the non-ferrous metal contents (Cu, Ni) can amount to up to
30 %, for example, with monosludges (i.e. sludges from one process type only). The major part
of the electroplating sludge is a mixture and has non-ferrous metal contents of about 10 %, as
Table 4.19 shows.

Cu % Ni % Zn % Pb % Cr % Fe % Ca % Cl % SO
4
% Water %
Cu sludge 5 10 1 - 5 1 - 5 0 - 1 0 - 2 5 - 15 2 - 10 0 - 3 0 - 20 50 - 70
Ni sludge 0 - 2 10 - 15 1 0 - 1 0 - 2 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 3 0 - 5 50 - 70
Mixed sludge 0 - 2 0 - 2 2 - 3 0 - 1 0 - 2 5 - 15 5 - 15 0 - 3 5 - 20 50 - 70
Table 4.19: Typical composition of electroplating sludge from different sources
UBA

Some liquid wastes, such as end-of-life electrolytes or layer conversion solution may also be
concentrated and treated in the in-house waste water treatment plant.

Other wastes can be re-used or recycled externally, see 4.17.3. In order to facilitate this, it may
be good practice to separate or concentrate certain waste streams, to increase or maintain their
usefulness.

4.17.2 Waste minimisation and avoidance

There are four key factors for the avoidance and minimisation of waste in surface treatment
processes, and they are described in the appropriate sections:

reducing the amount of hazardous material in the waste, see Substitution, in Section 4.9
extension of the service lifetime of the process solutions, see Process Solution
Maintenance, in Section 4.11
decrease of the drag-out of process solutions, see Section 4.6
feedback of the dragged-out process solutions into the process tanks, see Section 4.7.

4.17.3 Re-use and recycling of waste

Description
Wastes that cannot be recovered internally may be valorised externally by third parties.

To assist with this, it may be good practice to keep these waste streams separate to maintain a
concentration of components that makes recovery viable or to prevent contamination, such as
contamination of aluminium hydroxide sludge with heavy metals.

The following are examples of external valorisation:

hydro and pyrometallurgical companies engaged in non-ferrous metal refining. Part of
the electroplating sludge may have a high value material content and recycling by third
parties can be arranged in many cases. Recycling includes refining of the metals copper,
nickel, chromium and zinc from suitable electroplating sludge as metals or metal
compounds
manufacture of usable metal concentrates
phosphoric and chromic acids, spent etching solutions, etc.
aluminium hydroxide from anodising can be precipitated and recycled, for example as a
coagulant for sewage treatment. (Note: the rinsing waters from colouring and sealing
processes may contain heavy metals and it is advisable to collect sludge separately from
these waste water streams if re-use is required)
inorganic chemical companies and the glass and ceramics industry which use metals or
metal compounds intentionally in the manufacture of products.
Chapter 4
380 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Techniques where the metals are merged non-specifically into mineral matrices (glass,
ceramics, cement) are not considered recycling, but may be an option. Note that European
legislation now controls the amount of hexavalent chromium in cement.

In the surface treatment installation used electrolytes, coating and conversion solutions which
are no longer suitable for regeneration become liquid waste. These solutions can be transferred
under certain conditions to the chemical suppliers for re-use in the direct manufacture of new
electrolytes.

The preferred aim is the recovery for use of the raw material, i.e. winning the metals copper,
nickel and zinc from the redundant electrolytes. This technique also exists in principle for semi-
concentrates such as the contents of the static rinses. It may be favourable to further concentrate
these strong solutions by evaporation or other concentration techniques which lowers the
transport costs and at the same time increases the valuable material content.

Achieved environmental benefits
Recovery of commodity metals which are conservative (i.e. non-degradable).
Re-use of materials instead of discarding them.
Replacement of fresh raw materials by re-used ones.

Cross-media effects
Emissions from, and energy used in recovery processes.
Chemicals used to achieve a suitable waste for reprocessing.

Operational data
It is advisable to consider the balance of recovery and recycling. For instance, some in-process
re-use in the process solution may recover a small amount of metal, but reduce the metal content
of the installations sludge below the environmental and economic recovery breakeven point.
The sludge then disposed of may still contain more metal than could have been recovered.

Recycling opportunities are favoured if the streams within the effluent system are kept separate
according to their metal contents. The amount of separation applied depends on the
requirements of the recycling companies.

Copper, nickel, chromium and zinc are regularly recovered. Some small quantities of precious
metals, tin, lead and cadmium also arise. Sodium and calcium occur as precipitating chemicals.
Re-use is technically possible if sludges are produced by appropriate pre- or post-treatment
measures which satisfy the requirements of recycling plants in their consistency and material
composition. These requirements include:

physical parameters such as consistency and water content
meeting or exceeding the minimum content of usable metals
producing a mixture of metals which is usable
minimum content of substances which disturb the recycling process.

The requirements of the recycling plants for consistency and composition of the electroplating
sludge differ substantially from each other, depending on the particular recycling process and
require assessing on a case by case basis.

Applicability
Dependent on the availability of suitable re-use options and the suitability of the sludge.
For instance, recovered chromium oxides with high chloride content may not be suitable for
recovery of the chromium in some processes.
Transport (distance to the recycler) may also be a factor.

Economics
Case dependent.
Cost of disposal of surface treatment wastes, which are usually classed as hazardous.
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 381
Driving force for implementation
Increasing disposal costs for hazardous wastes.

Example plants
WRC Gmbh, Wurzen (Germany)

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003], [30, EC, 2003, 152, ESTAL, 2004, 155, EIPPCB, ], [89, EIPPCB, ]

4.17.4 In-house electrolytic recovery

See Section 4.11.9.

4.18 Air emission abatement techniques

Chapter 2 identifies processes which lead to emissions of concern, for example: pickling, certain
etching processes, brightening, certain plating tanks, etc. Typical substances emitted to the air
are described in Section 3.3.3. For workers health and safety it is often necessary to limit
certain emissions inside surface treatment installations: whilst the overall potential emission
load to the environment does not change, emission abatement techniques, such as scrubbing,
may have cross-media impacts (for example to waste water and in energy consumption). Good
environmental practice in preventing emissions can be complementary to occupational health
objectives.

It is widespread practice to minimise the amount of humid and/or corrosive fumes. This not
only protects employee health, but also:

protects workpieces or substrates in storage or in the various stages of processing, see
Section 4.3.1
protects the installation infrastructure
protects control systems in process control and other sensitive equipment (computers,
etc).
[80, INRS, , 104, UBA, 2003]

Some or all of these measures may be used together.

Where the extracted air contains materials that may cause environmental harm (as described in
the appropriate processes in Chapters 2 and 4), the air can be treated by options described in
Section 2.13.3.4

4.18.1 Additives

Description
According to manufacturers data, in pickling solutions, the formation of nitrite ions and Cr(VI)
ions are prevented by pickling additives. The emissions of HF and NO
X
can also be reduced so
that it is not necessary to install an exhaust air scrubber.

It is also possible to be reduce or prevent Cr(VI) aerosol emissions from chromium plating tanks
by the use of fluorinated additives but note that these are based on PFOS, see Section 1.4.4.4
and Annex 8.2. Aerosols from alkaline etching or anodising can be prevented by using
surfactants. For both processes there are unfluorinated surfactants which are used with success.

Chapter 4
382 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Achieved environmental benefits
Reduced formation of harmful species, therefore reducing their concentration and emission.
Prevention of the formation of harmful mists or aerosols (especially for Cr(VI) plating).
Air extraction may not be needed as a foam layer may be formed which is sufficient to minimise
the release of hazardous substances to air.

Cross-media effects
PFOS (polyfluorinated octyl sulphonate) is used in suppressing Cr(VI) mists, and in other
applications. It is toxic, bio-accumulative and persistent (see Annex 8.2).

Operational data
Additives can also improve product quality.

Applicability
See individual applications.

Economics
May in some cases achieve sufficiently low emissions without the need for air extraction and/or
reduce the size, complexity and cost of extraction equipment.

Driving force for implementation
Occupational heath and safety legislation as well as emission limit values.

Example plants

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 113, Austria, 2003, 159, TWG, 2004]

4.18.2 Air extraction, lids and treatment techniques

Overall description
Covering the tanks when either the immersion time for a jig or barrel needs extended time or the
baths are not used minimises the emissions to the workplace atmosphere, and subsequently to
the environment. Containing the air space above the vat by using lids reduces the amount of air
to be withdrawn and treated. A description of some options for lids is given in this section and
an example can be seen in Figure 4.33.

Figure 4.33: Jig line with lids on vats and air extraction
Graindorge S.A. and Agence de leau Seine-Normandie
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 383
Containment is discussed in several BREFs (see Reference Literature). The containment of the
sources of potential emissions minimises the amount of emission and airflow, although the
airflow may need treatment.

Edge exhausts are normally employed to meet industrial health and safety requirements and
various configurations are described in Section 4.18.3.

The quantity of exhaust air sucked off by the edge exhaust, and the quantity of pollutants it
contains are influenced by the following parameters:

tank size
continuous or intermittent operation of the bath
bath temperature
physico-chemical characteristics of the assigned chemicals
classification and permissible concentration at the workplace
use in conjunction with pickling additives to decrease and/or avoid of the emissions of
HF and NO
X
gases and Cr(VI) aerosols
emission control procedures, etc.
types, size and density of particulates
the space between the exhaust slots and the surface of the vat
the strength of the electric currents in electrolytic processes
the type of bath agitation used (such as air, pumped recirculated flow or eductor).

The pollutants emitted with the drawn off exhaust air are separated where necessary to achieve
emission standards by the following exhaust air cleaning devices:

exhaust air scrubbers with fill materials and droplet separators
exhaust air scrubbers with the following combinations:
o cyanide and acid separation in an alkaline scrubber
o nitrogen oxides and hydrofluoric in an acid scrubber
o exhaust air containing Cr(VI) by droplet separators
mist filters used for aerosols and droplets, such as Cr(VI)
droplet separators for aerosols and droplets, such as Cr(VI), which may be followed by
filters
cyclones, electrostatic precipitators or filters (for examples for dusts from mechanical
polishing).

These are described in the BREF on waste water and waste gas treatment in the chemical sector
for extraction systems.

Organic solvents, such as VOCs from solvent degreasing, are emitted, they are discussed with in
the BREF on the surface treatment using solvents.

The industry generally produces a small source of NO
X
. Major uses are in pickling and
brightening, and emissions are low with typical air scrubber systems, without the need for
catalytic reduction (see Economics below and Annex 8.12).

In the case of some combinations of different systems, there are slight deviations to the exhaust
air purification measures described above.

Overall achieved environmental benefits
Additives can decrease the formation of gases and Cr(VI) aerosols and may extend the life of
pickling acids.

Lids reduce the amount of gases and aerosols emitted to the air.

Chapter 4
384 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Section 3.3.3 show that the use of simple extraction systems using droplet separators and/or
counter-flow scrubbing readily achieved normal target values.

No data are available for the effectiveness on emissions of the other process measures (additives
and lids).

Overall cross-media effects
Air extraction can have a significant effect on power consumption in three ways:

additional electricity to power fans and pumps
unwanted loss of heated workspace air during working periods when outside
temperatures are below about 12 C (this may be more significant in Northern and
Central Europe)
unwanted cooling of process solutions by increasing evaporation requiring additional
process energy input.

Additives may be harmful to health and the environment, see Section 1.4.4.4 and Annex 8.2.

Overall operational data
Options to reduce the volume of extracted air and decrease the energy losses are discussed in
Section 4.18.3, below.

Overall applicability
One or more of these options is suitable for all installations.

Overall economics
It is not cost-effective for the industry as a whole to install catalytic reduction for NO
X
, see
Annex 8.12.

Overall driving force for implementation
Workplace health and safety.

Reference literature
[66, PPRC, 2003, 80, INRS, 104, UBA, 2003] [87, EIPPCB, , EIPPCB, #155, EIPPCB, #86]
[90, EIPPCB, ].

4.18.3 Reduction of the volume of extracted air

General description
The most common system uses extraction hoods located laterally to the entrance area for plating
jigs on flight bars and plating barrels above processing vats, see Figure 4.34.

Figure 4.34: Example of fume extraction on top of treatment tank
Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 385
The efficiency of the air extraction is determined by the minimal air velocity (vx) necessary to
capture the uprising vapour, fumes or aerosols at the most distant point from the extraction
hood.

Values for vx differ between 0.2 m/s capture velocity for moderate water vapours and 0.5 m/s
for aerosols from hard chromium plating solutions.

The volume of air to be extracted depends on the free surface area of the processing solution.

It can be calculated by the following equations:

Single-sided extraction (W <0.5 m) V = 2 vx L W (W/L)0.2

Double-sided extraction (W >0.5 m) V = 2 vx L W (W/2L)0.2

V = volume of extracted air, m
vx = minimal air velocity at point x, m/s
L = length of extraction area, in metres
W = width of extraction area, in metres.

Single-sided extraction is normally used for tanks of width W<0.5 m, see Figure 4.35, and
double-sided extraction for wider tanks (W >0.5 m), see Figure 4.36.

W
x
Figure 4.35: Single-sided extraction (W <0.5 m)
W
x
W/2 W/2

Figure 4.36: Double-sided extraction (W >0.5 m)

There are three options to reduce the volume of extracted air:

(1) Reduction of free surface area above tanks
Figure 4.37 and Figure 4.38 show different means of minimising the air volume extracted and
thus energy consumption.

Figure 4.37: Lid protecting free surface area, fixed to and moved with the flight bar
Chapter 4
386 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 4.38: Lid protecting free surface area above extraction hood, movable by the transporter

Figure 4.37: Since hazardous fumes or aerosols are generated mainly during processing, lids
fixed to and moved with the flight bar are a suitable means for reducing the volume of extracted
air by 60 75 % of the normal rate without a reduction in the surface area.

Figure 4.38: These lids cover all process stations where vapour, fumes or aerosols are generated
at any time except during loading and unloading of the stations. The reduction in extraction rate
increases may be more than 90 % (subject to a German patent). A major advantage of this
system is that these lids need no drive at the station itself, since they are moved simultaneously
with the drip tray of the transporter.

Lids hinged to the tank, driven individually and automatically opening and closing when jigs
and barrels enter and leave the processing tank are another appropriate but more expensive
design. Usually this system is combined with a device designed to automatically increase the
volume of extracted air when the lids are opened. A reduction in extraction rate of up to 90 %
may be achieved.

(2) Push-pull system
This method is designed to create an airflow over the surface of the processing bath. It works
with an extraction hood opposite a blowing duct. The surface of the processing solution must
not have any frame or obstacle to the airflow. Therefore its application remains quite limited.

(3) Enclosure of the plating line
Recently, the complete segregation of the process plant has been achieved in some installations..
The plating line is installed inside an enclosure, while all plant operations, the plant
management systems, and the loading/unloading stations are located outside; see Section 4.2.3.
Since a substantial amount of extracted air is still necessary to prevent corrosion of the
equipment within the enclosure, an energy saving higher than the figures for other techniques
cannot be expected.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of the volume of extracted air reduces energy consumption and any required
treatment processes, chemicals, etc.

Applicability
Attention needs to be paid to energy efficiency in all installations using air extraction.
Process control is feasible for all installations. Other options will be site-specific.

Where the processing line is enclosed, the maintenance of the plant and solutions may become
more complicated and time-consuming This technique is likely to be most effective with new
installations, rather than retrofitting.

Economics
Case-specific, but see the Example Plant below where the operational savings gave a two year
payback, and one year payback if capital savings are included.

Driving force for implementation
Health and safety in the work place.

Chapter 4
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 387
Example plant
See Annex 8.9, Goodrich Aerospace Landing Gear Division, Tullahoma, Tennessee, US,

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 113, Austria, 2003]

4.18.4 Treatment of extracted air

Treatment options are described in Section 2.13.3.

4.18.5 Air extraction control techniques

Description
Air extraction can be operated during operating periods for the solutions of concern, and when
conditions require, such as when process solutions are fully heated and working. Care may be
taken that the air extraction system does not operate when it is not required, especially when
outside temperatures are low and/or workplace cooling or heating are functioning. Timers can
be installed.

Achieved environmental benefits
Energy saving.

Applicability
Process control is feasible for all installations.

Economics

Driving force for implementation
Cost saving.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002]

4.18.6 Energy recovery from extracted air

Description
The exhaust air is passed through a heat exchanger. The capital investment and operating costs
are very high. Savings from energy recovery are only a fraction of these costs, a feasibility study
prior to installation including economic considerations is essential to ensure sound investment.
More information is given in the BREFs on Waste Water and Waste Gas Management Systems
and Surface Treatments using Solvents.

Achieved environmental benefits
Energy recovery.

Operational data
Attention needs to be paid to energy efficiency in all installations using air extraction.

Applicability
This energy saving measure is limited to installations of large size and/or with large volumes of
warm air being extracted.

Reference literature
[3, CETS, 2002, 87, EIPPCB, , 90, EIPPCB, ]
Chapter 4
388 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
4.19 Noise management

Description
It is good practice to reduce noise from the installation so impact upon the local community is
not significant. Noise can be eliminated or reduced at source (in-process), such as extracting
hydrogen produced by electrolysis and so preventing explosions across the top of vats with
certain electrolytic processes. Delivery transport can also have an impact locally, and can be
managed by reducing deliveries and/or managing delivery times.

Noise reduction can be achieved through engineering noise control measures where required,
such as installation of silencers to large fans, use of acoustic enclosures where practicable for
equipment with high or tonal noise levels, etc.

Effective plant operation includes closure of bay doors.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduced noise.

Cross-media effects
Use of silencers can lead to an increase in energy as pressure drops increase.
Closing bay doors can increase demands on internal ventilation and cooling.

Operational data
Site-specific

Applicability
To new and existing plants.

Economics
Case specific, but usually no payback. Increased cost of ventilation with workplace doors
closed.

Driving force for implementation
Prevention of noise complaints. Compliance with occupational health legislation.

Example plants
SOFRA-PCB, Mennecy, France.

Reference literature
[19, Eurofer, 2003], [115, CETS, 2003].

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 389
5 BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES

In understanding this chapter and its contents, the attention of the user/reader is drawn back to
the preface of this document and in particular the fifth section of the preface: How to
understand and use this document. The techniques and associated consumption and/or emission
levels, or ranges of levels, presented in this chapter have been assessed through an iterative
process involving the following steps:

identification of the key environmental issues for the sector; surface treatment of metals
and plastics. These are related to:
o management systems and construction of the site
o water and raw materials usage and emissions
o substitution for hazardous materials
o energy usage
o site contamination on cessation of activities
examination of the techniques most relevant to address these key issues
identification of the best environmental performance levels, on the basis of the available
data in the European Union and worldwide
examination of the conditions under which these performance levels were achieved;
such as costs, cross-media effects, and the main driving forces involved in
implementation of the techniques
selection of the best available techniques (BAT) and the associated consumption and/or
emission levels for this sector in a general sense, all according to Article 2(11) and
Annex IV of the Directive.

Expert judgement by the European IPPC Bureau and the relevant Technical Working Group
(TWG) has played a key role in each of these steps and in the way in which the information is
presented here.

On the basis of this assessment, techniques, and as far as possible consumption and emission
levels associated with the use of BAT, are presented in this chapter that are considered to be
appropriate to the sector as a whole and in many cases reflect the current performance of some
installations within the sector. Where consumption or emission levels associated with best
available techniques are presented, this is to be understood as meaning that those levels
represent the environmental performance that could be anticipated as a result of the application,
in this sector, of the techniques described, bearing in mind the balance of costs and advantages
inherent within the definition of BAT. However, they are neither consumption nor emission
limit values and should not be understood as such. In some cases it may be technically possible
to achieve better consumption or emission levels but due to the costs involved or cross-media
considerations, they are not considered to be appropriate as BAT for the sector as a whole.
However, such levels may be considered to be justified in more specific cases where there are
special driving forces.

The consumption and emission levels associated with the use of BAT have to be seen together
with any specified reference conditions (e.g. averaging periods).

The concept of levels associated with BAT described above is to be distinguished from the
term achievable level used elsewhere in this document. Where a level is described as
achievable using a particular technique or combination of techniques, this should be
understood to mean that the level may be expected to be achieved over a substantial period of
time in a well maintained and operated installation or process using those techniques.
Chapter 5
390 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Where available, data concerning costs have been given together with the description of the
techniques presented in the previous chapter. These give a rough indication about the magnitude
of the costs involved. However, the actual cost of applying a technique will depend strongly on
the specific situation regarding, for example, taxes, fees, and the technical characteristics of the
installation concerned. It is not possible to evaluate such site-specific factors fully in this
document. In the absence of data concerning costs, conclusions on economic viability of
techniques are drawn from observations on existing installations.

It is intended that the general BAT in this chapter are a reference point against which to judge
the current performance of an existing installation or to judge a proposal for a new installation.
In this way they will assist in the determination of appropriate BAT-based conditions for the
installation or in the establishment of general binding rules under Article 9(8). It is foreseen that
new installations can be designed to perform at or even better than the general BAT levels
presented here. It is also considered that existing installations could move towards the general
BAT levels or do better, subject to the technical and economic applicability of the techniques in
each case.

While the BAT reference documents do not set legally binding standards, they are meant to give
information for the guidance of industry, Member States and the public on achievable
consumption and emission levels when using specified techniques. The appropriate limit values
for any specific case will need to be determined taking into account the objectives of the IPPC
Directive and the local considerations.

The BAT summarised below are applicable to existing and new plants, unless otherwise stated.
The feasibility of implementing a technique is, however, also driven by other factors to be
considered, such as higher relative cost to smaller installations, limitations of some techniques,
available space and infrastructure at a site (such as waste water treatment plants).

Some key findings to help users/readers of this document
During the preparation of this document, several important issues became apparent when
considering the key environmental issues:

although the industry is complex in the size and range of activities, the same key
environmental issues apply to all. The techniques applied to address these issues are
also wide-ranging, and often transferable. This section is therefore split into those BAT
that are generic and those that are specific to certain activities
in exceptional cases, the generic BAT do not apply to certain specific activities and
these are noted
it is strongly recommended to read Chapter 4 in conjunction with this chapter. To help
the reader, references to Chapter 4 have been included in this Chapter 5.

When interpreting the consumption and emission levels or ranges associated with BAT given in
this chapter it is essential that the user/reader understands that:

these consumption or emission ranges are not the same as emission limit values (see the
introduction to this chapter, above)
across the EU-25, ELVs are set and enforced in different ways
for a particular installation, lowering an emission level within the consumption or
emission range may not represent BAT overall (when considering costs and cross-
media effects) and that antagonism may exist between BAT, i.e. lowering one may
increase another. For these reasons, an installation may not operate with all parameters
at the lowest levels in all the ranges.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 391
5.1 Generic BAT

5.1.1 Management techniques

Environmental management, housekeeping and maintenance systems
There are number of techniques related to the continuous improvement of environmental
performance. They are intimately linked with good practice in the areas of designing, building,
operating and maintaining an installation for optimal efficiency. These techniques provide the
framework for ensuring the identification, adoption and adherence to BAT options that, while
often down-to-earth, remain important in improving environmental emissions. Indeed,
housekeeping/maintenance/management techniques often prevent emissions.

A number of management techniques are determined as BAT. The scope (e.g. level of detail)
and nature of the system (i.e. such as for EMS, whether it is standardised or non-standardised)
will generally be related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of
environmental impacts it may have.

5.1.1.1 Environmental management

BAT is to implement and adhere to an Environmental Management System (EMS) that
incorporates, as appropriate to individual circumstances, the following features: (see Section
4.1.1):

definition of an environmental policy for the installation by senior management (the
commitment of the senior management is regarded as a precondition for a successful
application of other features of the EMS)
planning and establishing the necessary procedures
implementation of the procedures, paying particular attention to:
o structure and responsibility
o training, awareness and competence
o communication
o employee involvement
o documentation
o efficient process controls
o maintenance programmes
o emergency preparedness and response
o safeguarding compliance with environmental legislation
checking performance and taking corrective action, paying particular attention to:
o monitoring and measurement (see also the Reference document on Monitoring of
Emissions)
o corrective and preventive action
o maintenance of records
o independent (where practicable) internal auditing in order to determine whether or
not the environmental management system conforms to planned arrangements and
has been properly implemented and maintained
review by senior management.

Chapter 5
392 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Three further features, which can complement the above stepwise, are considered as supporting
measures. However, their absence is generally not inconsistent with BAT. These three
additional steps are:

having the management system and audit procedure examined and validated by an
accredited certification body or an external EMS verifier
preparation and publication (and possibly external validation) of a regular
environmental statement describing all the significant environmental aspects of the
installation, allowing for year-by-year comparison against environmental objectives and
targets as well as with sector benchmarks as appropriate
implementation and adherence to an internationally accepted voluntary system such as
EMAS and EN ISO 14001:1996. This voluntary step could give higher credibility to the
EMS. In particular EMAS, which embodies all the above-mentioned features, gives
higher credibility. However, non-standardised systems can in principle be equally
effective provided that they are properly designed and implemented.

Specifically for this industry sector, it is also important to consider the following potential
features of the EMS:

the environmental impact from the operation and eventual decommissioning of the unit
at the stage of designing a new plant
the development and use of cleaner technologies
where practicable, the application of sector benchmarking on a regular basis, including
energy efficiency and energy saving, water efficiency and water saving, raw material
use and choice of input materials, emissions to air, discharges to water, and generation
of waste.

5.1.1.2 Housekeeping and maintenance

It is BAT to implement a housekeeping and maintenance programme, which will include
training and the preventative actions workers need to take to minimise specific environmental
risks, see Sections 4.1.1(c) and 4.1.1.1.

5.1.1.3 Minimising the effects of reworking

It is BAT to minimise the environmental impacts of reworking by management systems that
require regular re-evaluation of process specifications and quality control jointly by the
customer and the operator (see Section 4.1.2). This can be done by:

ensuring specifications are:
o correct and up to date
o compatible with legislation
o applicable
o attainable
o measurable appropriately to achieve customers performance requirements
both customer and operator discussing any changes proposed in each others processes
and systems prior to implementation
training operators in the use of the system
ensuring customers are aware of the limitations of the process and the attributes of the
surface treatment achieved.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 393
5.1.1.4 Benchmarking the installation

It is BAT to establish benchmarks (or reference values) that enable the installations
performance to be monitored on an ongoing basis and also against external benchmarks (see
Section 4.1.3). Benchmarks for individual activities are given in this chapter where data exists.
Essential areas for benchmarking are:

energy usage
water usage
raw material usage.

Record and monitor usage of all utility inputs by type: electricity, gas, LPG and other fuels, and
water, irrespective of source and cost per unit, see Sections 4.1.1(j) and 4.1.3. The detail and
period of recording, whether hourly, by shift, by week, by square metre throughput or other
measure etc. will be according to the size of the process and the relative importance of the
measure.

It is BAT to continuously optimise the use of inputs (raw materials and utilities) against
benchmarks. A system to action the data will include:

identifying a person or persons responsible for evaluating and taking action on the data
action being taken to inform those responsible for plant performance, including alerting
operators, rapidly and effectively, to variations from normal performance
other investigations to ascertain why performance has varied or is out of line with
external benchmarks.

5.1.1.5 Process line optimisation and control

It is BAT to optimise individual activities and process lines by calculating the theoretical inputs
and outputs for selected improvement options and comparing with those actually achieved see
Section 4.1.4.

Information from benchmarking, industry data, advice in this document and other sources can
be used. Calculations can be performed manually, although this is easier with software.

For automatic lines, it is BAT to use real time process control and optimisation, see Section
4.1.5.

5.1.2 Installation design, construction and operation

Process lines in this sector have commonality with the storage of chemicals, and the reference
document on BAT for Storage contains relevant techniques [23, EIPPCB, 2002]. It is BAT is to
design, construct and operate an installation to prevent pollution by the identification of hazards
and pathways, simple ranking of hazard potential and implementing a three-step plan of actions
for pollution prevention (see Section 4.2.1):

Step 1:
allow sufficient plant dimensions
contain areas identified as being at risk from any chemical spillage by using appropriate
materials to provide impervious barriers
ensure the stability of the process lines and components (including temporary and
infrequently used equipment).

Chapter 5
394 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Step 2:
ensure storage tanks used for risk materials are protected by using construction
techniques such as double skinned tanks or by situating them within contained areas
ensure operating tanks in process lines are within a contained area
where solutions are pumped between tanks, ensure the receiving tanks are of sufficient
size for the quantity to be pumped
ensure there is a either a leak identification system or contained areas are regularly
checked as part of the maintenance programme.

Step 3:
regular inspection and test programmes
emergency plans for potential accidents, which will include:
o site major incident plans (appropriate to size and location of the site)
o emergency procedures for chemical and oil spillages
o containment facility inspections
o waste management guidelines for dealing with waste arising from spillage
control
o identification of suitable equipment and regularly ensuring it is available and in
good working order
o ensure staff are environmentally aware and trained to deal with spillages and
accidents
o identification of the roles and responsibilities of persons involved.

5.1.2.1 Storage of chemicals and workpieces/substrates

In addition to the general issues in the reference document on Storage [23, EIPPCB, 2002], the
following issues have been identified as specific BAT for this sector (see Section 4.2.2):

avoid generating free cyanide gas by storing acids and cyanides separately
store acids and alkalis separately
reduce the risk of fires by storing flammable chemicals and oxidising agents separately
reduce the risk of fire by storing any chemicals which are spontaneously combustible
when damp, in dry conditions and separately to oxidising agents. Mark the storage area
of these chemicals to avoid the use of water in fire-fighting
avoid the contamination of soil and water environments from spillages and leakages of
chemicals
avoid or prevent the corrosion of storage vessels, pipework, delivery systems and
control systems by corrosive chemicals and fumes from their handling.

To minimise additional processing, it is BAT to prevent degradation of metal
workpieces/substrates in storage (see Section 4.3.1) by one or a combination of:

shortening storage time
controlling the corrosivity of the storage atmosphere by controlling the humidity,
temperature and composition
using either a corrosion preventing coating or corrosion preventing packaging.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 395
5.1.3 Agitation of process solutions

It is BAT to agitate process solutions to ensure a movement of fresh solution over the work
faces (see Section 4.3.4). This may be achieved by one or a combination of:

hydraulic turbulence
mechanical agitation of the workpieces
low pressure air agitation systems in:
o solutions where the air assists cooling by evaporation particularly when used with
materials recovery (but see Section 5.1.4.3)
o anodising
o other processes requiring high turbulence to achieve high quality
o solutions requiring oxidation of additives
o where it is necessary to remove reactive gases (such as hydrogen).

It is not BAT to use low pressure air agitation with:

heated solutions where the cooling effect from the evaporation increases the energy
demand
cyanide solutions as it increases carbonate formation
solutions containing substances of concern where it increases the emissions to air (see
Section 5.1.10).

It is not BAT to use high pressure air agitation because of the high energy consumption.

5.1.4 Utility inputs energy and water

It is BAT to benchmark utilities (see Section 5.1.1.4). BAT for water usage materials efficiency
are described in detail in Section 5.1.5 and 5.1.6.

5.1.4.1 Electricity high voltage and large current demands

Measures to manage high voltages and high current demands are described in Section 4.4.1. It is
BAT to reduce electricity consumption by:

minimise reactive energy losses for all three phase supplies by testing at annual
intervals to ensure that cos k between the voltage and the current peaks lies
permanently above 0.95
reduce the voltage drop between conductors and connectors by minimising the distance
between the rectifiers and anodes (and conductor rolls in coil coating). The installation
of the rectifiers in direct proximity of the anodes is not always realisable or may subject
the rectifiers to sever corrosion and/or maintenance. Alternatively, bus bars with larger
cross-sectional area can be used
keep the bus bars short, with sufficient cross-sectional area, and keep cool, using water
cooling where air cooling is insufficient
use individual anode feeding by bus bar with controls to optimise current setting
regularly maintain rectifiers and contacts (bus bars) in the electrical system
install modern electronically-controlled rectifiers with a better conversion factor than
older types
increase of conductivity of process solutions through additives and by maintenance of
solutions (this must be in be optimised with Sections 5.1.5.3, 5.1.5.3.1 and 5.1.6.1)
use modified wave forms (e.g. pulse, reverse) to improve metal deposits, where the
technology exists.

Chapter 5
396 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
5.1.4.2 Heating

Different heating techniques are described in Section 4.4.2.

When using electric immersion heaters or direct heating applied to a tank, it is BAT to prevent
fires by monitoring the tank manually or automatically to ensure it does not dry out.

5.1.4.3 Reduction of heating losses

It is BAT to reduce heating losses by (see Section 4.4.3):

seeking opportunities for heat recovery
reducing the amount of air extracted across the heated solutions by one of the
techniques described in Sections 4.4.3 and 4.18.3
optimising the process solution composition and working temperature range. Monitor
temperature of processes and control within these optimised process ranges, see
Sections 4.1.1, 4.1.3 and 4.4.3.
insulating heated solution tanks by one or more of the following techniques:
o using double skinned tanks
o using pre-insulated tanks
o applying insulation
insulating the surface of heated tanks by using floating insulation sections such as
spheres or hexagonals. Exceptions are where:
o workpieces on racks are small, light and may be displaced by the insulation
o workpieces are sufficiently large to trap the insulation sections (such as vehicle
bodies)
o the insulation sections can mask or otherwise interfere with the treatment in the
tank.

It is not BAT to use air agitation with heated process solutions where the evaporation caused
increases the energy demand (see Section 5.1.3).

5.1.4.4 Cooling

Cooling is described in Section 4.4.4. It is BAT to:

prevent over-cooling by optimising the process solution composition and working
temperature range. Monitor temperature of processes and control within these optimised
process ranges, see Sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.3
use closed refrigerated cooling system, for new or replacement cooling systems
remove excess energy from process solutions by evaporation (see Section 4.7.11.2)
where:
o there is a need to reduce the solution volume for make-up chemicals
o evaporation can be combined with cascade and/or reduced water rinsing systems to
minimise water and materials discharges from the process (see Sections 5.1.5.4 and
5.1.6).
install an evaporator system in preference to a cooling system where the energy balance
calculation shows a lower energy requirement for forced evaporation than for additional
cooling and the solution chemistry is stable, (see Section 4.7.11.3).

It is BAT to design, locate and maintain open cooling systems to prevent the formation and
transmission of legionella (see Section 4.4.4.1)

It is not BAT to use once-through water cooling systems except where local water resources
allow or where the water can be re-used (see Section 4.4.4.1).
Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 397
5.1.5 Waste minimisation of water and materials

In this sector, most raw material losses occur in waste waters, therefore the minimisation of
losses of water and raw materials are considered together in the following sections.

5.1.5.1 Water minimisation in-process

It is BAT to minimise water usage by:

monitoring all points of water and materials usage in an installation, record the
information on a regular basis, according to the usage and the control information
required (see Section 4.4.5.2). The information is used for benchmarking and the
environmental management system, see Section 5.1.1.4.
recovering water from rinsing solutions by one of the techniques described in Sections
4.4.5.1, 4.7.8, 4.7.12 and referred to in Section 4.10 and re-use in a process suitable for
the quality of the water recovered (see Section 5.1.5.1)
avoiding the need for rinsing between activities by using compatible chemicals in
sequential activities (see Section 4.6.2).

5.1.5.2 Drag-in reduction

It is BAT for new lines or upgrades to reduce drag-in of surplus water from prior rinsing by
using an eco rinse (or pre-dip) tank, see Section 4.5. Build-up of particulates can be controlled
to the required quality level by filtering.

This also assists drag-out reduction, in conjunction with other drag-out and rinsing techniques,
(see Section 4.7.4, 4.7.11, 4.7.12 and 5.1.5.3).

Eco-rinse (pre-dip) cannot be used:

where problems are caused with subsequent processes (such as partial chemical pre-
plating)
in carousel, coil coating or reel-to-reel lines
with etching or degreasing
in nickel lines because of increased quality problems
in anodising, as material is removed from the substrate (not added).

5.1.5.3 Drag-out reduction

It is BAT to use one or more of the techniques described in this section and Sections 5.2.2, 5.2.3
and 5.2.4 to minimise the drag-out of materials from a process solution (see Section 4.6).

Chapter 5
398 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The exceptions are:

where this is not necessary because of the application of alternative BAT:
o where sequential chemical systems are compatible (see Section 5.1.5.1)
o after an eco-rinse (pre-dip, see Section 5.1.5.2)
where the reaction at the surface requires stopping by rapid dilution during:
(These are the same exceptions to a reduction in the rinsing ratio given in Section
5.1.5.4)
o hexavalent chromium passivation
o etching, brightening and sealing of aluminium, magnesium and their alloys
o zincate dipping
o pickling
o pre-dip when activating plastic
o activating prior to chromium plating
o colour lightening after alkali zinc
for draining time, where a delay causes de-activation of, or damage to, the surface
between treatments, such as between nickel plating followed by chromium plating.

5.1.5.3.1 Reduction of viscosity

It is BAT to reduce the viscosity by optimising the process solution properties (see Section
4.6.5):

lowering the concentration of chemicals or using low-concentration processes
adding wetting agents
ensuring the process chemicals do not exceed the recommended values
ensuring the temperature is optimised according to the process range and the
conductivity required.

5.1.5.4 Rinsing

It is BAT to reduce water consumption by using multiple rinsing (see Section 4.7.10).

Eco-rinse (pre-dip, see Section 5.1.5.2) can be combined with other rinse stages to increase
effectiveness of the multiple rinsing system, see Section 4.7.11.

The reference value for water discharged from the process line using a combination of BAT to
minimise water usage is 3 20 l/m
2
/rinse stage. Rinse stages and the calculation are described
in Section 4.1.3.1. The value may be calculated to relate to other throughput factors (such as
weight of metal deposited, weight of substrate throughput, etc) at individual installations.
Values towards the lower end of the range can be achieved by both new and existing plants
using techniques described in Section 4.7 and 4.10.

Spray techniques (see Section 4.7.5) are important techniques to achieve the lower end of this
range.

PCB installations are generally above this range and may be in the order of 20 - 25 l/m
2
/rinse
stage or higher. However, reductions in volume may be limited by high quality requirements.

It is BAT to conserve process materials by returning the rinse-water from the first rinse to the
process solution (see Section 5.1.6.3, as well as Section 5.1.6.1).

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 399
Reductions in water discharge to the lower ends of these ranges may be limited for local
environmental reasons by concentrations of:

boron
fluoride
sulphate
chloride.

The cross-media effects of increased energy and chemicals used to treat these substances
outweigh the benefits of decreasing the water discharge to the lower part of the range.

The exceptions to this BAT to reduce water consumption are:

where the reaction at the surface requires stopping by rapid dilution:
o hexavalent chromium passivation
o etching, brightening and sealing of aluminium, magnesium and their alloys
o zincate dipping
o pickling
o pre-dip when activating plastic
o activating prior to chromium plating
o colour lightening baths after alkali zinc
where there is a loss in quality caused by too much rinsing (Note: this exclusion is not
applicable to Section 5.1.5.3).

5.1.6 Materials recovery and waste management

BAT is:

prevention
reduction
re-use, recycling and recovery.

Of these, the prevention and reduction of all material losses is the priority. The loss of both
metals and non-metallic components together can be prevented or significantly reduced by using
BAT in the production processes (see the sections below and Sections 4.6 4.7, 4.7.8, 4.7.10,
4.7.11 and 4.7.12).

Metals in the sludge may be recovered off-site, see Section

The TWG considered the material efficiencies given in Section 3.2.3, and derived levels given
in Table 5.1 for some processes that are associated with a variety of techniques referred to in
this Section 5.1.6.

Chapter 5
400 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Process Materials use efficiency in process %
70 % with passivation (all processes)
80 % without (all processes)
Zinc plating
95 % for coil coating
Electrolytic nickel plating
(closed loop)
95 %
Electrolytic nickel plating (not
closed loop)
80 85 %
copper plating (cyanide process) 95 %
Copper plating (not closed loop) 95 %
Hexavalent chromium plating
(closed loop)
95 %
Hexavalent chromium plating
(not closed loop)
80 90 %
Precious metal plating 98 %
Cadmium 99 %
Table 5.1: Levels for in-process materials efficiency

5.1.6.1 Prevention and reduction

It is BAT to prevent the loss of metals and other raw materials together, as both metal and non-
metallic components are retained. This is achieved by reducing and managing drag-out,
described in Sections 4.6 and 5.1.5.3 and increasing drag-out recovery, as described in Section
4.7, 4.7.11 and referred to in Section 4.10, including ion exchange, membrane, evaporation and
other techniques to both concentrate and re-use drag out and recycle rinse-waters.

It is BAT to prevent the loss of materials through overdosing. This is achieved by:

monitoring the concentration of process chemicals
recording and benchmarking usage (see Section 5.1.1.4)
reporting deviations from benchmarks to the responsible person and making
adjustments as required to keep the solution within optimum limit values.

This is most consistently achieved by using analytical control (usually as Statistical Process
Control, SPC) and automated dosing (see Section 4.8.1).

5.1.6.2 Re-use

It is BAT to recover the metal as anode material using the techniques described in Section 4.12
and in combination with drag-out recovery (Section 4.7 and Sections 5.1.6.4 and 5.1.6.3). This
can greatly assist with reducing water usage and recovery of water for further rinse stages.

5.1.6.3 Materials recovery and closing the loop

It is BAT to conserve process materials by returning the rinse-water from the first rinse to the
process solution. This can be achieved by a combination of the techniques described in Sections
4.7, 4.7.8, 4.7.10, 4.7.11 and 4.7.12). Solution maintenance may be increased, although most
modern systems require increased maintenance (often online). Suitable methods for controlling
metals build up are discussed in Section 5.1.6.5, and other maintenance methods are given in
Section 5.1.7.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 401
Where all the materials are returned with the rinse-water, a closed loop is achieved for this
process within the process line (see Section 4.7.11). Closing the loop refers to one process
chemistry within a process line, not to entire lines or installations.

It is BAT to close the materials loop for:

hexavalent hard chromium
cadmium.

Closing the loop for process chemicals can be achieved by applying a suitable combination of
techniques such as: cascade rinsing, ion exchange, membrane techniques, evaporation (see
Section 4.7.11)

Closed loop is not zero discharge: there may be small discharges from the treatment processes
applied to the process solution and process water circuits (such as from ion exchange
regeneration). It may not be possible to keep the loop closed during maintenance periods.
Wastes and exhaust gases/vapours will also be produced. There may also be discharges from
other parts of the process line.

Closing the loop achieves a high raw material utilisation rate and in particular can:

reduce the use (and therefore cost) of raw materials and water
as a point-source treatment technique, achieve low emission limit values
reduce the need for end-of-pipe waste water treatment (e.g. removing nickel from
contact with effluent containing cyanide)
reduce overall energy usage when used in conjunction with evaporation to replace
cooling systems
reduce the use of chemicals for treating the recovered materials that would otherwise be
discharged in the waste water
reduce the loss of conservative materials such as PFOS where used.

Closing the loop has been successfully achieved on some substrates for:

precious metals
cadmium
barrel nickel plating
copper, nickel and hexavalent chromium for decorative rack plating
hexavalent decorative chromium
hexavalent hard chromium
etching copper from PCBs.

Details are given in Section 4.7.11; for nickel (using reverse osmosis) see Section 4.7.11.5; and
for chromium (using evaporation) see Section 4.7.11.6.

Chapter 5
402 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
5.1.6.4 Recycling and recovery

After applying techniques for the prevention and reduction of losses (see Section 5.1.6.4 above),
it is BAT to (see Section 4.17.3):

identify and segregate wastes and waste waters either at the process stage or during
waste water treatment to facilitate the recovery or re-use
recover and/or recycle metals from waste waters as described in Section 4.12 and 4.15.7
re-use materials externally, where the quality and quantity produced allow, such as
using aluminium hydroxide suspension from aluminium surface treatments to
precipitate phosphate from the final effluents at municipal waste water treatment plants
recover materials externally, such as phosphoric and chromic acids, spent etching
solutions, etc.
recover metals externally.

The overall efficiency can be raised by external recycling. However, third party routes have not
been validated by the TWG for their cross-media impacts or their own recovery efficiency.

5.1.6.5 Other techniques to optimise raw material usage

Different electrode yields
In electroplating, where the anode efficiency is higher than the cathode efficiency and the metal
concentration is constantly increasing, it is BAT to control the metal concentration according to
the electrochemistry (see Section 4.8.2) by:

external dissolution of the metal, with electroplating using inert anodes. Currently, the
main application is for alkaline cyanide-free zinc plating
replacing some of the soluble anodes by membrane anodes with separate extra current
circuit and control. Membrane anodes are breakable, and it may not be possible to use
this technique in sub-contract plating, where the shapes and sizes of parts to be plated
vary continuously (and may make contact with and break membranes)
using of insoluble anodes where the technique is proven.

5.1.7 General process solution maintenance

It is BAT to increase the process bath life as well as maintain output quality, particularly when
operating systems near to, or at, the closing of the materials loop (see Section 5.1.6.3) by:

determining critical control parameters
maintaining them within established acceptable limits by the removal of contaminants.

Suitable processes are described in Sections 4.10 and 4.11.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 403
5.1.8 Waste water emissions

An overview of techniques is discussed in Section 4.16. Specific BAT for waste water treatment
and discharges are given below.

5.1.8.1 Minimisation of flows and materials to be treated

It is BAT to minimise all water usage in all processes, however, there are local situations where
the reduction of water usage may be limited by increasing concentration(s) of anions that are
difficult to treat, see Section 5.1.5.

It is BAT to eliminate or minimise the use and loss of materials, particularly priority substances,
see Sections 4.6 and 4.7 (see also water and raw materials usage techniques to close the
materials loop, Section 5.1.6.3). Substitutes for and/or control of certain hazardous substances is
described in Section 5.2.5.

5.1.8.2 Testing, identification and separation of problematic flows

It is BAT when changing types or sources of chemical solutions and prior to their use in
production to test for their impact on the existing (in-house) waste water treatment systems (as
described in Section 4.16.1). If the test indicates a potential problem either:

reject the solution, or
change the waste water treatment system to deal with the problem.

It is BAT to identify, separate and treat flows that are known to be problematic when combined
with other flows (see Section 4.16.1 and 4.16.2) such as:

oils and greases (see Section 4.16.3
cyanide (see Section 4.16.4)
nitrite(see Section 4.16.5)
chromates (CrVI) (see Section 4.16.6)
complexing agents (Section 4.16.8)
cadmium (Note: while it is a Parcom Recommendation [12, PARCOM, 1992] to
separate cadmium flows for treatment, it is BAT to operate cadmium processes in a
closed loop, with no discharge to water, see Section 5.1.6.3).

5.1.8.3 Discharging waste water

It is BAT to monitor and discharge waste water according to Section 4.16.13.

The emission levels given in are Table 5.2 achieved in a sample of surface treatment
installations. They are derived from Section 3.3.1 and from Table 3.20 and are indicative of
what can be achieved using a combination of BAT using a combination of in-process techniques
described in Sections 4.5 to 4.12 and Section 4.16as well as in the BREF on waste water and
waste gas treatment/management [87, EIPPCB, ]. BAT for substituting less hazardous
substances and processes are given in Section 5.2.5 and discussed in Section 4.9.

For a specific installation, these concentration levels should be considered in conjunction with
the loads emitted from the installation, the installations technical specification, e.g. throughput,
as well as other BAT, especially measures to reduce water consumption. In particular, it should
be noted that measures to reduce the flow can reduce load, until a point where increased
concentration of dissolved salts increases the solubility of some metals, such as zinc (see
Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1.5.1).
Chapter 5
404 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
In Section 3.3.1 it can be seen that, while the low ends of these ranges may be regularly met in
some installations, they may not be met with 100 % confidence for 100 % of normal operation.

BAT may be optimised for one parameter, but this may not be optimal for other parameters (for
example, flocculation and settlement of metals in waste water treatment cannot be optimised for
individual metals). This means that the lowest values in the ranges may not be all be met at the
same time. In site-specific or substance-specific cases, separate treatment(s) may be required.

The BAT associated with emission values are expected for samples that are daily composites.

Note that only relevant substances (i.e. those used and arising in the processes in the
installation) apply to the individual installations.

Emission levels associated with some plants using a range of BAT
These values are for daily composites unfiltered prior to analysis and taken after treatment and
before any kind of dilution, such as by cooling water, other process waters or receiving waters
Jig, barrel, small scale coil, automotive, PCB
and other activities not large scale steel coil
Large scale steel coil coating
All values
are mg/l
Discharges to
public sewer (PS)
or surface water
(SW)
Additional
determinands only
applicable for surface
water (SW) discharges
Tin or ECCS Zn or Zn-Ni
Ag
0.1 0.5
Al
1 10
Cd
0.1 0.2
CN free

0.01 0.2
Cr(VI)
0.1 0.2 0.0001 0.01
Cr total
0.1 2.0 0.03 1.0
Cu
0.2 2.0
F
10 20
Fe 0.1 - 5 2 - 10
Ni 0.2 - 2.0
Phosphate as
P
0.5 - 10
Pb
0.05 - 0.5
Sn
0.2 - 2 0.03 - 1.0
Zn
0.2 - 2.0 0.02 - 0.2 0.2 - 2.2
COD 100 - 500 120 - 200
HC Total
1 - 5
VOX
0.1 - 0.5
Suspended
Solids
5 - 30
4 - 40 (surface
waters only)

Table 5.2: Emission ranges to water associated with some BAT for some installations

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 405
5.1.8.4 Zero discharge techniques

Zero discharge can be achieved for a whole installation, based on a mixture of techniques and
discussed in Section 4.16.12.

Zero discharge is not BAT, as it generally involves high power consumption and can produce
wastes that are difficult to dispose of. The combination of techniques required to achieve zero
discharge are also high in capital and running costs. They are used in isolated cases for specific
reasons.

5.1.9 Waste

BAT for waste minimisation are given in Section 5.1.5 and for materials recovery and waste
management in Section 5.1.6.

5.1.10 Air emissions

For VOC releases from the vapour degreasing equipment, e.g. trichloroethylene and methylene
chloride, refer to the reference documents on surface treatment using solvents [90, EIPPCB, ]
and waste water and waste gas management/treatment in the chemical sector [87, EIPPCB, ] as
well as the Solvent Emissions Directive [97, EC, 1999]

Table 5.3 lists substances and/or activities whose fugitive emissions may have local
environmental impacts and the conditions when they need air extraction. In some cases, this is
related to health and safety inside the workplace.

Other processes may also require extraction, and individual process descriptions are given in
Chapters 2 and 4

When extraction is applied, it is BAT use the techniques described in Section 4.18.3 to
minimise the amount of air to be discharged.

Chapter 5
406 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Type of solution or
activity
Solutions needing extraction
In all cases:
Cyanide
Cadmium
Hexavalent chromium
with one or more of
following attributes:
electroplating solutions
heated or self-heating
agitated with air
Nickel solutions When agitated with air
Ammonia
Solutions emitting ammonia, either where ammonia is a component or a
breakdown product
Dust producing
activities such as
polishing and linishing

Using insoluble anodes All: hydrogen and/or oxygen are formed with a risk of deflagration.
Acid solutions
Solutions not needing
extraction
Solutions needing extraction
Nitric acid processes
with emissions of NO
X
Processes for the surface treatment of metal
which are likely to result in the release into
the air of any acid-forming oxide of nitrogen
include:
chemical brightening of aluminium
bright dipping of chemical polishing of
copper alloys
pickling using nitric acid, which may
also contain hydrofluoric acid
in-situ cleaning using nitric acid
chemical stripping using nitric acid
Pickling and stripping
using hydrochloric acid
Hydrochloric acid used at
ambient temperatures and
concentrations below 50 % v/v
technical grade with water
generally does not evolve HCl gas
or fumes which require extraction
for health and safety reasons
Hydrochloric acid used at higher
concentrations and/or at elevated
temperatures generates significant releases of
HCl gas or fumes which requires extraction
for health and safety reasons and to prevent
corrosion in the workplace. (Technical grade
is 31 - 36 % HCl, therefore 50 % dilution
equals a solution of about 15 - 18 % HCl.
Solutions stronger than this require
extraction).
Pickling and stripping
using sulphuric acid
Sulphuric acid used at
temperatures below 60 C
generally does not evolve acid
mists which require extraction for
health and safety reasons
Sulphuric acid used at temperatures above
60 C releases a fine aerosol of the acid
which requires extraction for health and
safety reasons and to prevent corrosion in the
workplace
Hydrofluoric acid
pickling
In all cases
Alkali solutions
Aqueous alkaline
cleaning
Alkaline cleaning chemicals are
non-volatile and do not require
fume extraction for health and
safety reasons or local
environmental protection
Alkaline cleaning tanks operating above
60 C can generate significant amounts of
water vapour which may be extracted for
operator comfort and to prevent corrosion
Table 5.3: Solutions and activities which may require prevention of fugitive emissions

The emission levels given in Table 5.4 are achieved in a sample of surface treatment
installations. They are derived in Section 3.3.3and from Table 3.28 and are indicative of what
can be achieved using a combination of in-process techniques described in Section 4.18 and in
the BREF on waste water and waste gas treatment/management [87, EIPPCB, ]. BAT for
substituting less hazardous substances and processes are given in Section 5.2.5 and discussed in
Section 4.9.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 407
Emissions
mg/Nm
3
Emission ranges for
some installations
mg/Nm
3
Emission ranges for some
large scale steel coil activities
mg/Nm
3
Some techniques used to
meet local environmental
requirements associated
with the emission ranges
Oxides of nitrogen
(total acid forming
as NO
2
)
<5 500 nd
Scrubbers or adsorption
towers generally give values
below about 200 mg/l and
lower with alkali scrubbers
Hydrogen fluoride <0.1 2 nd Alkali scrubber
Hydrogen chloride <0.3 30
Tin or chromium (ECCS)
process
25 30
Water scrubber
See Note 2
SO
x
as SO
2
1.0 10 nd
Countercurrent packed tower
with final alkaline scrubber
Ammonia as N -
NH
3
0.1 10
Note: Data is from
electroless nickel.
No data for PCB
manufacture
nd Wet scrubber
Hydrogen cyanide 0.1 3.0 nd
Non-air agitation
Low temperature processes
Non-cyanide processes
The lower end of the range
can be met by using an alkali
scrubber
Zinc <0.01 0.5
Zinc or zinc nickel
process
0.2 2.5
Water scrubber
See Note 2
Copper <0.01 0.02 nd See Note 2
CrVI and
compounds as
chromium
Cr(VI) <0.01 0.2
Total Cr <0.1 0.2
nd
Substitution of Cr(VI) by
Cr(III) or non-chromium
techniques (see Section
5.2.5.7)
Droplet separator
Scrubbers or adsorption tower
Ni and its
compounds as
nickel
<0.01 0.1 nd
Condensation in heat
exchanger
Water or alkali scrubber
Filter
See Note 2
Particulate matter <5 30
Tin or chromium (ECCS)
process
1 20
For dry particulates treatment
may be necessary to achieve
the lower end of the range,
such as:
Wet scrubber
Cyclone
Filter
For wet processes, wet or
alkali scrubbers achieve the
lower end of the range
See Note 2
Note 1: nd = no data provided
Note 2: in some circumstances, some operators are meeting these ranges without EoP
Table 5.4: Indicative emission ranges to air achieved by some installations

Chapter 5
408 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
5.1.11 Noise

It is BAT to identify significant noise sources and potential targets in the local community. It is
BAT to reduce noise where impacts will be significant by using appropriate control measures
(see Section 4.19), such as:

effective plant operation, for example:
o closure of bay doors
o minimising deliveries and adjusting delivery times, see Section 4.18
engineered controls such as installation of silencers to large fans, use of acoustic
enclosures where practicable for equipment with high or tonal noise levels, etc.

5.1.12 Groundwater protection and site decommissioning

It is BAT to protect groundwater and assist the decommissioning of the site by:

giving consideration to the eventual decommissing during the design or upgrading of
the installation, see 4.1.1(h).
situating the materials on site within contained areas, using the design operation and
accident prevention and handling techniques described in Section 5.1.2
recording the history (as far as known) of priority and hazardous chemicals in the
installation, and where they were used and stored (see Section 4.1.1.1).
update this information yearly, in line with the EMS (see Section 4.1.1)
use the information acquired to assist with installation shutdown, removal of equipment,
buildings and residues from the sites, see 4.1.1(h).
take remedial action for potential contamination of groundwater or soil (see Section
4.1.1).

5.2 BAT for specific processes

The general BAT in Section 5.1 apply to jig, barrel and manual lines. The following specific
BAT also apply.

5.2.1 Jigging

In jig (rack) lines, it is BAT to arrange the jigging to minimise loss of workpieces and maximise
current carrying efficiency, see Section 4.3.3.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 409
5.2.2 Jig lines drag-out reduction

It is BAT to prevent drag-out of process solutions in jig processing lines by a combination of the
following techniques (see Section 4.6.3 and individual references):

arrange the workpieces to avoid retention of process liquids by jigging at an angle and
jigging cup-shaped components upside down
maximise draining time when withdrawing the jigs. Indicative reference values for
draining jigs are given in Table 4.2. This will be limited by:
o the type of process solution
o the quality required (long draining times can result in the process solution part-
drying on the substrate)
o the transporter duty time available for automatic plants
regularly inspect and maintain jigs so there are no fissures or cracks to retain process
solution, and that the jig coatings retain their hydrophobic properties
arrange with customers to manufacture components with minimal spaces to trap process
solution or to provide drainage holes
fit drainage ledges between tanks canted back to the process tank.
spray-rinse, mist or air spray excess process solution back into the process tank (see
Sections 4.6.6 and 4.7.5). This may be limited by:
o the type of process solution
o the quality required.

Spraying can give rise to over-spray, aerosols of chemicals, and drying too rapidly causing
blemishes. These can be overcome by:

spraying in a tank or other enclosure
using low-pressure sprays (splash rinsing).

There is a possibility that legionella bacteria may infect aerosols. However, these can be
controlled by design and maintenance.

5.2.3 Barrel lines drag-out reduction

It is BAT to prevent drag-out of process solutions in barrel processing lines by a combination of
the following techniques (see Section 4.6.4):

constructing the barrels from a smooth hydrophobic plastic and inspecting regularly for
worn areas, damage, recesses or bulges that may retain process solution
ensuring the bores of holes in the barrel bodies have sufficient cross-sectional area in
relation to the required thickness of the panels to minimise capillary effects
ensuring the proportion of holes in the barrel bodies is high as possible for drainage
while retaining mechanical strength
replacing holes with mesh plugs (although this may not be possible with heavy
workpieces).

On withdrawing the barrel, it is BAT to prevent drag-out of process solutions in barrel
processing lines:
withdrawing slowly to maximise drag-out, see Table 4.3
rotating intermittently
sparging (rinsing using a pipe inside the barrel)
fitting drainage ledges between tanks canted back to the process tank
inclining the barrel from one end where possible.

Chapter 5
410 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Indicative values for draining barrels are given in Table 4.3.

It should be noted that while these techniques reduce the drag-out in barrel lines, recovery of the
subsequent first rinse is more effective (see Sections 5.1.5 and 5.1.6).

5.2.4 Manual lines

It is BAT when operating manual lines to:

apply the jigging techniques in Sections 4.3.3 when jig processing
increase drag-out recovery rate by using the techniques described in Sections 5.1.5,
5.1.6, as well as techniques in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3
support the jig or barrel on racks above each activity to ensure the correct draining time
and increase the efficiency of spray rinsing, see Sections 4.7.6 and 5.1.5.4.

5.2.5 Substitution for, and/or control of, hazardous substances

It is a general BAT to use less hazardous substances (see Section 4.9).

Specific cases where less hazardous substances and/or processes can be used are given below.
Where a hazardous substance has to be used, techniques for minimising the use of the hazardous
substance and/or reducing its emission are described below. In some cases, this is in conjunction
with improving process efficiency and/or minimising the use or emission of materials in
activities.

5.2.5.1 EDTA

It is BAT to avoid the use of EDTA and other strong chelating agents by one of the following:

using biodegradable substitutes such as those based on gluconic acid (see Section 4.9.1)
using alternative methods such as direct plating in PCB manufacture (see Section 4.15)

Where EDTA is used it is BAT to:

minimise its release using material and water saving techniques (See Section 5.1.5 and
5.1.6)
ensure no EDTA is released to waste water by using treatment techniques described in
Section 4.16.8.

Cyanide is a strong chelating agent, but is discussed separately in Section 5.2.5.3.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 411
5.2.5.2 PFOS (perfluorooctane sulphonate)

There are limited options to substitute for PFOS and health and safety may be a particularly
important factor.

Where PFOS is used, it is BAT to minimise the use by:

monitoring and controlling the additions of materials containing PFOS by measuring
surface tension (see Section 4.9.2)
minimising air emissions by using floating insulation sections (see Section 4.4.3)
controlling the air emissions of the hazardous fumes as described in Section 4.18.

Where PFOS is used, it is BAT to minimise its emission to the environment by material
conservation techniques, such as closing the material loop, see Section 5.1.6.3.

In anodising plants, it is BAT to use PFOS-free surfactants, see Section 4.9.2

In other processes, it is BAT to seek to phase out PFOS. The are limitations to these options
discussed in the indicated sections:

using PFOS-free processes: substitutes for alkali cyanide-free zinc electroplating
Sections 4.9.4.2 and for hexavalent chromium processes, see Section 4.9.6
enclosing the process or the relevant tank for automatic lines, see Sections 4.2.3 and
4.18.2.

5.2.5.3 Cyanide

It is not possible to replace cyanide in all applications, see Table 4.9. Where cyanide solutions
have to be used, it is BAT to use closed loop technology with the cyanide processes 5.1.6.3.

However, cyanide degreasing is not BAT (see Sections 4.9.5 and 4.9.14).

When cyanide process solutions need to be agitated it is not BAT to use low pressure agitation
as it increases carbonate formation (see Section 5.1.3)

5.2.5.4 Zinc cyanide

It is BAT to substitute zinc cyanide solutions by using (see Section 4.9.4):

acid zinc for optimum energy efficiency, reduced environmental emissions and for
bright decorative finishes (see Section 4.9.4.3
alkali cyanide-free zinc where metal distribution is important (see Section 4.9.4.2, but
note it may contain PFOS, see Section 5.2.5.2)

5.2.5.5 Copper cyanide

It is BAT to substitute cyanide copper by acid or pyrophosphate copper (see Section 4.9.5),
except:

for strike plating on steel, zinc die casts, aluminium and aluminium alloys
where copper strike plating on steel or other surfaces would be followed by copper
plating.

Chapter 5
412 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
5.2.5.6 Cadmium

It is BAT to plate cadmium in a closed loop system, see Section 5.1.6.3.

It is BAT to carry out cadmium plating in separately contained areas, with a separately
monitored emission level to water.

5.2.5.7 Hexavalent chromium

Substitution for hexavalent chromium is discussed in Section 4.9.8 and in more detail in Annex
8.10: BAT are described in the sections below. There are general limitations to substitution:
trivalent chromium has not been used on an economic scale on large scale steel coating and
cannot be used for hard chromium applications. Chromic acid anodising has limited use, mainly
for aerospace, electronics and other specialist applications. There is no replacement.

5.2.5.7.1 Decorative chromium plating

For decorative uses, it is BAT to replace hexavalent chromium either:

by plating with trivalent chromium. Where increased corrosion resistance is required,
this can be achieved by trivalent chromium solution with increased nickel layer
underneath and/or organic passivation (for Cr(III) chloride based solutions, see Section
4.9.8.3, and for Cr(III) sulphate based solutions, 4.9.8.4).

Or:

with a chromium-free technique, such as tin-cobalt alloy, where specifications allow
(see Section 4.9.9)

However, there may be reasons at the installation level where hexavalent chromium is used for
decorative finishes, such as where customer specifications require it for:

colour
high corrosion resistance
hardness or wear resistance.

It is not BAT to use trivalent chromium for plating large scale steel coil as it is not technically
proven. The electrolyte composition is likely to reduce plating efficiency below that sufficient
for the line speed.

Plating systems such as for hexavalent chromium are a significant investment and include
specific equipment such as anodes, as well as the solutions. The solution cannot simply be
changed for different customer batches. However, to minimise the amounts of hexavalent
chromium, it is possible to use a cold chromium technique (see Section 4.9.8.2) and where there
is more than one decorative hexavalent chromium process line in the same installation, the
option exists to run one or more one lines for hexavalent specifications and one or more lines
with trivalent chromium

When changing to trivalent or other solutions, it is BAT to check for complexing agents
interfering with waste water treatment, see Section 5.1.8.2.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 413
5.2.5.7.2 Hexavalent chromium plating

When using hexavalent chromium plating, it is BAT to:

reduce air emissions by one or a combination of the following (see Section 4.18):
o covering the plating solution during plating, either mechanically or manually,
particularly when plating times are long or during non-operational periods
o use air extraction with condensation of the mists in the evaporator for the closed
loop materials recovery system. Substances which interfere with the plating
process may need to be removed from the condensates before re-using, or removed
during bath maintenance (see Section 4.7.11.6)
o for new lines or when rebuilding the process line and where the workpieces have
sufficient uniformity of size, enclose the plating line or plating tank (see Section
4.2)
operate hexavalent chromium solutions on a closed loop basis (see Sections 4.7.11.6
and Section 5.1.6.3 above). This retains PFOS and Cr(VI) in the process solution.

5.2.5.7.3 Chromium conversion (passivation) coatings

Reductions in the use of Cr(VI) passivations are being driven by the End of Life Vehicles and
RoHS directives [98, EC, 2003, 99, EC, 2000]. However, at the time of preparing this BREF
(2004), the TWG reports that current alternatives are new and no BAT can be concluded.
Trivalent passivations can be used, but have up to ten times the chromium concentration as well
as requiring higher energy input. They cannot match the higher corrosion resistance of the
brown, olive drab or black passivations achieved with Cr(VI) systems without using additional
coatings. Insufficient data has been supplied on non-chromium systems and they may contain
substances that are hazardous to the environmental.

5.2.5.7.4 Phospho-chromate finishes

It is BAT to replace hexavalent chromium with non- hexavalent chromium systems, see Section
4.9.12.

5.2.6 Substitution for polishing and buffing

It is BAT to use acid copper to replace mechanical polishing and buffing. However, this is not
always technically possible. The increased cost may be offset by the need for dust and noise
reduction techniques, see Section 4.9.13.

5.2.7 Substitution and choices for degreasing

Surface treatment operators, particularly contract or jobbing shops, are not always well
informed by their customers of the type of oil or grease on the surface of the workpieces or
substrates. It is BAT to liaise with the customer or operator of the previous process (see to
Section 4.3.2) to:

minimise the amount of oil or grease
and/or

select oils, greases or systems that allow the use of the most environmentally friendly-
degreasing systems.

Chapter 5
414 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
It is BAT where there is excessive oil, to use physical methods to remove the oil, such as
centrifuge (Section 4.9.14.1) or air knife (Section 4.9.15). Alternatively, for large, quality-
critical and/or high-value parts, hand wiping can be used (see Section 4.9.15).

5.2.7.1 Cyanide degreasing

It is BAT to replace cyanide degreasing with other technique(s), see Sections 5.2.5.3 and 4.9.5.

5.2.7.2 Solvent degreasing

Solvent degreasing can be replaced by other techniques (see Section 4.9.14 and specifically
4.9.14.2) in all cases in this sector as subsequent treatments are water-based and there are no
incompatibility issues. There may be local reasons at an installation level for using solvent-
based systems, such as where:

a water-based system can damage the surface being treated
there a specific customer has a specific quality requirement.

5.2.7.3 Aqueous degreasing

BAT is to reduce the use of chemicals and energy in aqueous degreasing systems by using long-
life systems with solution regeneration and/or continuous maintenance, off-line or on-line (see
Sections 4.9.14.4, 4.9.14.5, and 4.11.13).

5.2.7.4 High performance degreasing

For high performance cleaning and degreasing requirements, it is BAT to either use a
combination of techniques (see Section 4.9.14.9), or specialist techniques such as dry ice or
ultrasonic cleaning (see Sections 4.9.14.6 and 4.9.14.7).

5.2.8 Maintenance of degreasing solutions

To reduce materials usage and energy consumption, it is BAT to use one or a combination of
the techniques for maintenance and extending the life of degreasing solutions. Suitable
techniques are given in Section 4.11.13.

5.2.9 Pickling and other strong acid solutions techniques for extending
the life of solutions and recovery

Where consumption of acid for pickling is high, it is BAT to extend the life of the acid by using
one of the techniques in Section 4.11.14, or extend the life of electrolytic pickling acids by
using electrolysis to remove by-metals and oxidise some organic compounds (see Section
4.11.8).

Pickling and other strong acids may also be recovered or re-used externally, see Section 4.17.3
and 5.1.6.4, but may not be BAT in all cases.

Chapter 5
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 415
5.2.10 Recovery of hexavalent chromating solutions

It is only BAT to recover hexavalent chromium in concentrated and expensive solutions such as
black chromating solutions containing silver. Suitable techniques such as ion exchange or
membrane electrolysis techniques used at the normal scale for the sector are referenced in
Sections 4.10, 4.11.10 and 4.11.11. For other solutions, the make up costs for new chemicals are
only EUR 3 - 4/l.

5.2.11 Anodising

In addition to the generic BAT, any relevant specific BAT for processes and chemicals
(described above) apply to anodising. In addition, the following BAT apply specifically to
anodising:

heat recovery: It is BAT to recovery the heat from anodising sealing baths using one of
the techniques described in Section 4.4.3.
recovery of caustic etch: It is BAT to recover caustic etch (see Section 4.11.5) if:
o there is a high consumption of caustic solution
o there is no use of any additive to inhibit the precipitation of the alumina
o the etched surface achieved meets specifications.
closed loop rinsing: It is not BAT for anodising to use a closed rinsed water cycle with
ion exchange, as the chemicals removed are of similar environmental impact and
quantity to the chemicals required for regeneration
use PFOS-free surfactants (see Section 5.2.5.2).

5.2.12 Continuous coil large scale steel coil

In addition to the generic BAT described in Section 5.1, any relevant BAT for processes and
chemicals (described above in Sections 5.1 and 5.2) apply to large scale steel coil coating. The
following BAT apply specifically to coil processing:

use real time process control to ensure constant process optimisation (see Section 4.1.5)
use energy efficient motors when replacing motors or for new equipment, lines or
installations (see Section 4.4.1.3)
use squeeze rollers to prevent drag-out from process solutions or prevent the dilution of
process solutions by drag-in of rinse-water (see Section 4.6 and 4.14.5)
switch the polarity of the electrodes in electrolytic degreasing and electrolytic pickling
processes at regular intervals (see Section 4.8.3)
minimise the use of oil by using a covered electrostatic oiler (see Section 4.14.16)
optimise the anode-cathode gap for electrolytic processes (see Section 4.14.12)
optimise conductor roll performance by polishing (see Section 4.14.13)
use edge polishers to remove metal build-up formed at the edge of the strip. (see Section
4.14.14)
use edge masks to prevent overthrow when plating one side only (see Section 4.14.15).

Chapter 5
416 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
5.2.13 Printed circuit boards (PCBs)

In addition to the general BAT described in Section 5.1, any relevant BAT for processes and
chemicals (described above in Sections 5.2 and 5.3) apply to printed circuit board production.
The following BAT apply specifically to PCB manufacture:

rinsing: When rinsing between steps, use squeeze (wiper) rollers to reduce drag-out,
sprays and multiple rinse techniques described for other processes in Sections 4.6, 4.7
and particularly 4.7.5)
manufacturing the inner layers: This area is changing rapidly, with technological
advances driving customer specifications. Use techniques with low environmental
impact, such as alternative techniques to oxide bonding, see Section 4.15.1
dry resists: When developing dry resist (see Section 4.15.5):
o reduce drag-out by rinsing with fresh developer solution
o optimise the spraying of developer
o control the concentrations of the developer solution
o separate the developed resist from the effluent, such as by ultrafiltration
etching, in general: Use the drag-out and multiple rinse techniques described in Sections
4.6 and 4.7.10. Feed back the first rinse into the etching solution
acid etching: Monitor the concentration of acid and hydrogen peroxide regularly and
maintain an optimum concentration (see Section 4.15.6)
alkali etching: Monitor the level of etchant and copper regularly and maintain an
optimum concentration. For ammonia etching, regenerate the etching solution and
recover the copper as described (see Section 4.15.7)
resist stripping: Separate the resist from the effluent by filtration, centrifuge or
ultrafiltration according to the size of the flow (see Section 4.15.8)
stripping of the etch (tin) resist: Collect rinsing waters and concentrate separately.
Precipitate the tin-rich sludge and send for external recovery (see Section 4.15.9)
disposal of spent solutions: Many solutions contain complexing agents, such as those
used for:
o immersion or direct plating
o black or brown oxide process for inner layers

It is BAT to assess and dispose of them according to Section 4.15.10

to reduce air emissions from the application of solder mask: use high solids, low VOC
resins (see Section 4.15.11).

Chapter 6
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 417
6 EMERGING TECHNIQUES FOR THE SURFACE TREATMENT
OF METALS AND PLASTICS

An emerging technique is understood in this document as a novel technique that has not yet
been applied in any industrial sector on a commercial basis. This chapter contains those
techniques that may appear in the near future and that may be applicable to the surface treatment
of metals and plastics by electrolytic or chemical processes.

6.1 Process-integrated automated plating

Description
A project was initiated to integrate the electroplating processes into the production line to
minimise the process costs and environmental impacts (it is referred to as FIO in German).

The technology is particularly suited to uniform cylindrical workpieces manufactured in large
numbers. The anode is then shaped to fit around the workpiece (the cathode), leaving a very
small space between the cathode and the anode and creating an extremely high field intensity.
During plating, the anode is spun rapidly, which creates turbulence in the electrolyte, preventing
ion transport in the diffusion layer which is the limiting factor.

The combination of these two factors allows the electroplating to proceed rapidly, permitting
the process to be integrated into a production line.

An automatic sealed system delivers the electrolyte and removes it when it becomes exhausted.
A separate central processing system for returned electrolytes keeps the production line waste
and waste water free. Automation of the process means that staff are not exposed to any
chemicals.

Achieved environmental benefits
Waste- and waste water-free plating on the process line.
Deletion of production steps with a pollution load, such as degreasing and pickling.

Cross-media effects
No data provided

Applicability
Close co-operation (interdependence) between the operators and the chemical suppliers.
The process requires the use of proprietary chemicals and all the used chemicals must be
returned to the supplier.

Driving force for implementation
Workpieces have to be taken from the production line to the plating line for coating, then
returned for further processing or assembly. This creates additional work, as well increasing the
number of steps generating pollution loads, for example, greasing, degreasing and pickling.

Economics
No data provided.

Chapter 6
418 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Example plants
At the moment, the FIO technique is not in use. However pilot attempts were promoted by the
German Ministry for Science and Technology:

KVS plastics processing and service GmbH: KVS, the developers and
manufacturers of the FIO technique, could not establish FIO on the market. The
largest problem was the interdependence between the user and the chemicals
supplier. For many operators, the level of dependence on the chemical supplier is
thought to be too high a risk
Siemens corporation, -Central Department of Production and Logistics: The silver
plating of copper tubes was integrated into the manufacturing process for
experimental purpose. The promising beginning was not transferred to mass
production because of the sales of that production section to another company
Bosch: The procedure was technically feasible, however for unknown reasons it
was not transferred to mass production. Partial results of the research project (some
recycling technologies) are still in use in the company.

Reference literature
BMBF Verbundvorhaben (joint project) Manufacturing-integrated surface treatment (FIO)
FKZ 01ZH9503; 01ZH9504/4; 01ZH95098 [104, UBA, 2003]

6.2 Substitution by trivalent chromium plating for hexavalent
chromium in hard chromium applications using modified
pulse current

Description
The process uses a simplified trivalent chromium electroplating solution based on chromium
sulphate. The current waveform is proprietary (patents pending) and includes pulse-reverse
current. Chromium has been deposited at up to 250m successfully and could be deposited to
any thickness. Hardness, rate of deposition and post-finishing for thick coatings are the same as
for chromium from hexavalent solutions. Colour for thin layers is the same (chrome-blue) as
from hexavalent chromium. The process retains the advantages of Cr III solutions, such as
lower concentrations, higher current efficiency and tolerance to sulphate and chloride dragged-
in from any previous nickel plating stages. Lack of organic additives will reduce or eliminate
solution maintenance with activated carbon.

Plating rate
m/min
Current
efficiency
Hardness (VHN*) prior
to post-hardening
Process sequence
Automotive
OEM**
Cr(VI)
0.8 24 % 772
3-step precleaning
Plating
1-step post-
treatment
Cr(III)
process
1.2 30 % 777
3 step precleaning
Plating
1-step post-
treatment
Note: * VHN = Vickers Hardness Number (measurement of hardness)
** OEM = Original Equipment Manufacturer
Table 6.1: Comparison of hard chromium plating by traditional Cr(VI) and modified pulse current
Cr(III)

Chapter 6
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 419
Achieved environmental benefits
Replaces hexavalent chromium solutions, with reduced waste gas and waste water treatments.
Solution concentrations are the same as existing Cr(III) chemistry and up to ten times lower
than Cr(VI) solutions.

Higher current efficiency, therefore less power consumption.

No chloride electrolyte, so no production of chlorine.

Requires no organic additives to suppress chlorine formation, or such as PFOS to suppress mist
formation or to improve throw, etc.

A further stage of development will confirm if it can be operated as a closed loop system.

Cross-media effects
None

Operational data: Status of development
The process has been patented and is at pre-production verification in three key projects:

comparative testing (against Cr(VI) plated components) of 11 (28cm) rotors for pumps
handling abrasive slurries (such as in mining, oil exploration and cement handling).
Completion Spring 2004
rollers in large-scale steel rolling mill. Completion in Summer 2004
compliance with military specifications through an approved Commercial Technology
for Maintenance Activity (CTMA) project involving the US Department of Defence and
military maintenance depots with the National Centre for Manufacturing Sciences
(Michigan, US; CTMA promotes new techniques which reduce health, safety and
environmental risks in military applications). Completion in 2005.

Applicability
Intended applicability is full replacement of Cr(VI) electroplating for hard chromium
treatments.

Economics
Likely future operating costs: The system is chromium sulphate based, which is currently
slightly more expensive than existing CrIII chemistry (increased usage may reduce market
price). However, no organic additives are used, reducing cost and maintenance. Electricity costs
are likely to be half of present costs. Reduced effluent treatment chemicals, and possible
reduction in waste produced.

Likely future capital costs: Power supply: up to double the cost of a traditional DC supply.
Reduced requirements for waste gas and waste water treatment equipment.

Driving force for implementation
The development of alternatives to using hexavalent chromium electroplating solutions is driven
by health and safety in the workplace and environmental toxicity (chromium metal plated on a
surface has no adverse health effects). See Section 4.9.6.

Example plants
See Operational data

References
http://www.nttc.edu/resources/funding/awards/epa/pollution00/Phase2/renz.asp
http://www.newmoa.org/prevention/p2tech/ [108, NEWMOA, 2003]

Chapter 6
420 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
6.3 Substitution by chromium (III) conversion coatings for
chromium (VI) conversion layers

Description
Section 4.9.6 describes the drivers to change from Cr(VI) passivation treatments. These are
summarised in Driving force for implementation, below.

Achieved environmental benefits
Reduction of Cr(VI) in waste water discharges.

Cross-media effects
Higher process temperature and energy use.
May require additional organic (lacquer) layer.
The complexing agents may have adverse effects in waste water treatment plant.

Operational data
In a research project, supported by the Ministry of Science and Research, SurTech GmbH
developed a procedure for the production of 300 nm thick chromium (III) layers on
electroplated iron (called Chromitierung). The conversion layer is completely free of hexavalent
chrome and has a greenish appearance. This green colour (caused by interference bands)
disappears after adding an organic layer. The thickness of the Chromitierung layer is reached
by a high chrome concentration in the solution, an increased operating temperature of 60 C and
the employment of suitable complex ligands. By using dark pigments into the conversion layer
of the Chromitierung it can be given a black colour comparable to the black Cr(VI) chromate
finishing. Workpieces electroplated with nickel or cobalt can also be treated with chromium
(III) layers.

In salt spray tests the corrosion protection of both systems is approximately equal.

Driving force for implementation
The development of alternatives to using hexavalent chromium electroplating solutions is driven
by health and safety in the workplace and environmental toxicity (chromium metal plated on a
surface has no adverse health effects). See Section 4.9.6.

Example plants

Driving force for implementation
In addition to occupational health issues associated with the use of Cr(VI), the use of Cr(VI) as
a passivation (conversion) layer is under pressure because of its restriction in new vehicles by
the ELV Directive and its banning in electrical and electronics applications by the RoHS
directive see 4.9.6.

Reference literature
A research project of the German Ministry of science and Technology replacement of
Chromium-VI in zinc passivations" Foerderkennzeichen 01ZH9414/7
[98, EC, 2003], [99, EC, 2000]
http://www.faradaytechnology.com/tech-
briefs/Cr(III)%20Electroplating%20TECH%20Brief.pdf
Chapter 6
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 421
6.4 Aluminium and aluminium alloy plating from organic
electrolytes

Description
The possibility of production scale plating of aluminium onto steel is attractive because of the
high corrosion protection such a system offers. It would also enable substitution for more toxic
metals such as cadmium, zinc and nickel, as well as chromium used in passivation of zinc, etc.

However it is not possible to electroplate pure aluminium onto steel workpieces from an
aqueous solution.

The problem which has not been solved so far industrially, is applying an even, pure aluminium
layer on a workpiece, without stressing it thermally. Due to the negative potential of -1.7 V for
aluminium in the electromotive series of elements, the electro-chemical deposition from an
aqueous solution is not possible in the electroplating shop.

A technology electroplating from non- aqueous solvents has been described for many years on
laboratory and pilot scales. It has now been developed for the first time on an industrial scale for
plating with aluminium or aluminium-magnesium alloys first in Germany. This has shown the
technology to be feasible economically

A production plant with a 3 m
3
process tank was built, which can take workpieces up to 1500 x
600 mm. On a three-shift operation a maximum of 30 racks can be treated per day, which
corresponds to the capacity of a middle sized electroplating plating unit.

After a conventional pretreatment (degreasing, pickling) the workpieces are dried in a bath with
high boiling esters. Because of the high reactivity of the electrolytes with air and water the
processing step must take place in a totally enclosed plant. The jigs are placed in the processing
vat via an air-lock.

Achieved environmental benefits
Substitution by aluminium for more toxic metals such as cadmium, zinc and nickel.
There is no drag out of electrolyte, rinsing or any subsequent waste water and waste.

Cross-media effects
Because of the high reactivity of the electrolytes, the plating part of the plant must be a perfectly
closed system.

Emissions to water, to air and/or waste are likely to be:

waste water from the conventional degreasing and pickles
toluene from the air-lock and diffuse sources
waste as used electrolytes.

The used process solution is difficult to deal with and is managed off-site, where any associated
emissions of toluene, etc. will occur.

Operational data
As an electrolyte an aluminium alkyl complex dissolved in toluene is used. The anodes consist
of super-pure aluminium or aluminium/magnesium alloy. The current yield is almost 100 % and
the deposition speed is approximately 10 m per hour. The service lifetime of the electrolytes is
approximately six months. Currently, predominantly steel parts are coated such as screws, nuts,
springs, etc., for the automotive industry.

Handling the highly inflammable and explosive electrolytes requires completely new safety
precautions, which go a far beyond any normal electroplating shop.
Chapter 6
422 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Economics
No data provided

Driving force for implementation
High corrosion protection offered by aluminium coating.
Substitution by aluminium coating for more toxic metals.

Example plants
See Reference literature.

Reference literature
Projects funded by the German Federal Ministry of Science and Technology Development and
testing of a low-waste technology for the electro-deposition of aluminium coatings on all base
materials of technical importance (Sedec Galvano Aluminium KG; FKZ 01ZH 0326 and FKZ
01ZH8501) and UBA-Project: Development and Scale up of an environmentally friendly
galvanic process to deposit high purity aluminium layers on metal pieces (Aluminal
Oberflchentechnik GmbH; FKZ 30441-5/41). [104, UBA, 2003]

6.5 Printed circuit boards

6.5.1 Laser direct imaging

Considerable problems can occur with misalignment or distortion in the production of primary
images on inner and outer layers, causing problems with hole alignment. Laser direct imaging is
in use for primary imaging, but the technique is too slow for high volume production. It is
mainly used for production of prototypes and smaller series.

Laser direct imaging is also being developed for solder mask imaging, but laser imageable
solder masks are not available currently available (mid-2004).

Environmental benefits
No films required for the imaging process
No developing media and rinsing processes from diazo silver halide films
More precise imaging and less rejects with better material usage.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003] [159, TWG, 2004]

6.5.2 High density interconnects (HDI)

Description
HDI technology achieves higher packing density of electronic sub-assemblies. A dense primary
image is achieved by using new types of hole generation, giving smaller hole diameters and
smaller track width.

Smaller holes can be generated by laser, plasma or photo-processes. Development started in the
early 1990s but is still not finalised.

Environmental benefit
Smaller sub-assemblies requiring less material.

Reference literature
[122, UBA, 2003]

Chapter 6
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 423
6.5.3 Embedded passives

Description
Embedded passives is a technology which enables the manufacture of smaller boards with more
functionality and improved high frequency performance. The principle is to remove the discrete
resistors and capacitors from the surface and embed them in the inner layers of a PCB.
There are several different technologies available for embedded passives, from thin laminate
type of materials to various kinds of paste solutions."

Reference literature
[159, TWG, 2004]
Chapter 7
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 425
7 CONCLUDING REMARKS

7.1 Timing of the work

The first plenary meeting of the TWG was held in April 2002. The first draft was then sent for
consultation in August 2003. The comments were assessed and integrated into the document
and the second draft, including proposals for BAT conclusions, was sent out in April 2004. The
final plenary meeting of the TWG was held in September 2004. After the final meeting,
additional data for emissions to water and air associated with BAT were provided. There were
short consultations on the modified sections relating to BAT conclusions and on the concluding
remarks and executive summary.

7.2 Sources of information

Many documents were sent in by Member States and industry, and over 160 information
sources were used in all. The BAT documents from industry and Germany may be considered
as cornerstones for the first chapters including the techniques to be considered in the
determination of BAT (Chapter 4). These were supplemented by guides on BAT and good
environmental practice from France, Spain Belgium, the Netherlands, and the UK. Valuable
information on water usage, waste water treatment and emissions and other specific techniques
and their implementation in example plants was provided by France and Italy. Industry
associations provided important information on specific areas and techniques. Germany
provided results of a survey of installations applying multiple best practice techniques. Other
countries supplied details on specific techniques, and the UK (as project leader for the OECD
task force) supplied new data on PFOS (perfluorooctyl sulphonates) toxicity. Of the new
Member States, the Czech Republic and Hungary provided TWG members and contributed
information on specific issues. Site visits were made to the UK, Spain, France and Belgium.
Throughout the project there was generally good and open communication with experts in
industry and regulatory bodies. The consultation rounds provided specific feedback from these
experts on applicability and implementation of techniques and additional operational data.

There was a lack of quantitative data which has limited BAT conclusions in some areas. There
was also (with noted exceptions) little data on consumptions and emissions from Member
States. These topics are discussed in Recommendations for future work, below.

The quality of data in this document lacks consistency and completeness, making conclusions
difficult to draw: for example, the consumption and emission levels mentioned in Chapter 3 and
4 range from survey data for specific processes across the EU-15 to data covering several
example plants or specific data on specific plants. Important process data, such as type or
throughput of the process, were often not given and data in surveys incomplete. The most useful
parameters to measure and compare techniques when deriving BAT for this sector are
consumption or emission per m
2
. However, although the industry treats surfaces, there is little
data available on surface area throughput for the processes in an installation. This is due to the
difficulty in calculating the area of the complex shapes of the parts treated, and the variety of
parts processed in many installations. Units consumed or emitted with time (e.g. per hour), by
kilo of metal used (metal deposited, not substrate), or tonne of substrate throughput are also
useful, where given, but also need qualifying data.

Any data provided usually relate to process lines or installations and not to individual
techniques within a process line. The lack of specific data for individual processes means that
where values for water usage and process material efficiency are given, they are associated with
combinations of BAT. Emission levels to water and air are also associated with combinations of
several BAT.

Chapter 7
426 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Process development in the industry is mainly led by the suppliers of process chemistry and
equipment, as the industry comprises a large number of SMEs. However, with the exception of
individual experts and companies (particularly on chromium plating), the suppliers did not
contribute, in general, to the information exchange. This limited the information available for
some processes, and on recent developments, particularly for the substitution by some less toxic
chemicals and processes, different equipment types (such as for agitation of process solutions,
especially eductors), cooling and heating systems for processes or buildings, and the treatment
of water prior to use or re-use.

There was a major information exchange and validation on the substitution in electroplating for
hexavalent chromium by trivalent chromium. However, data about the substitution options for
passivation with hexavalent chromium were limited to a few operators. No data were received
from the EU Ecochrome project which is addressing the environmental problems associated
with electroplating with chromium VI, although several contacts were made.

No information was received on the large scale anodising of aluminium as coil, although there
is evidence of high throughput, particularly in the production of plates for the printing industry.

When validating information provided by TWG members, very little publicly-available data
could be found in Europe. The information was validated by directly contacting the source of
the information, individual experts or companies, or with data predominantly from the US.

7.3 Degree of Consensus reached

At the kick off TWG meeting the TWG discussed the 30m
3
threshold for the sector and for the
purposes of the information exchange and agreed this was the total of the volume of all the
process tanks in the installation. This included sprays, although there were differing opinions on
including degreasing activities. However, it was agreed that interpretation of this threshold was
more important for establishing if an installation needs a permit than determining which
processes should be covered in the document. The document therefore covers processes that can
occur on any scale, as the volumes of any process tanks meeting the descriptions electrolytic or
chemical are added together (see Annex I of the IPPC Directive).

There was a good general level of consensus overall. The conclusions of the work were agreed
at the final TWG meeting in September 2004 and full agreement was reached on all the BAT
conclusions, with no split views recorded.

7.4 Recommendations for future work

The information exchange and its result, i.e. this document, present an important step forward in
achieving the integrated prevention and control of pollution from the surface treatment of metals
and plastics. On some topics, however, better information would allow BAT conclusions to be
drawn that are more precise and therefore more helpful. Some issues have been identified in
Section 7.2, and are presented below with other issues identified during the information
exchange.

Chapter 7
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 427
Up to date information on process solutions and technique development

PFOS is a newly identified problem pollutant and appears likely to be controlled across the
EU and internationally. It is widely used as a foam suppressant and surfactant, especially in
preventing mists in hexavalent chromium plating and alkali non-cyanide zinc plating, as
well as improving the quality in other processes. Data should be gathered on the
effectiveness of options in operational practice, as well as on PFOS use and emission levels
hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) passivation on an electroplated zinc layer is one of the most
widely used treatments. However, the quantity of Cr(VI) left on the surface of parts for the
automotive, electronic and electrical goods industries is now controlled by two Directives.
The data available showed that current alternatives had cross-media effects such as toxicity
and/or higher energy requirements and the TWG concluded that no BAT could be reached
for alternatives. Information is required on the emerging options and the associated
consumptions and emission levels
data should be gathered on the EU Ecochrome project.

Quantitative data on achieved environmental benefits, economics and cross-media effects

Industry and Member States should gather and exchange data in these areas for the
techniques described, especially cooling systems, and water use/re-use. For heating
techniques, full operational data on all the options are also needed (see Chapter 4). This
would allow more specific and more helpful BAT to be concluded and qualified (such as
whether BAT applies to new or existing plants). Gathering data of this type may require
projects encompassing more than one Member State (possibly organised as a club
approach, see delivery for future work, below).

Quantitative consumptions and emissions data
Industry and Member States need to collect more information relating techniques to
consumptions and emissions (such as those reported in Annex 8.5). Existing data shows some
processes to be relatively inefficient. Standardised data sets that are comparable, particularly of
raw data, should be collected on more than one installation operating a given technique to
determine operating levels associated with individual BAT, as well as groups of BAT that are
well-defined. Again, this may require projects encompassing more than one Member State
(possibly organised as a club approach, see delivery for future work below), and would allow
more useful consumption and emission levels associated with BAT to be concluded, as well as
better information on the efficiency of individual processes.

Software for process optimisation
At least one software package for process optimisation has been reported, which uses standard
formulae, and most parameters can be varied. Other such packages should be identified. Such
software allows operators to simulate a range of BAT before financial commitment, and there is
a need for such software in languages other than English, and for a range of activities and
scenarios.

Update on progress and application of emerging processes and techniques
Data should be sought on the application and success of the techniques identified in Chapter 6.
Information can then be exchanged for the determination of BAT, and the conditions under
which the techniques become technically and economically viable.

Other recommendations
Whilst beyond the scope of the document, the following recommendations have arisen from the
information exchange and would assist the industry in achieving BAT, as well as increasing its
overall sustainability. Members States, regulators and industry are recommended to adopt these
initiatives.

Chapter 7
428 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
strategy for environmental goals and R&D for the sector
The surface treatment sector serves many different industries, and lacks a unified voice for
focusing awareness and attracting funding for research, development and other projects.
Most operators in the sector are SMEs, and R&D is largely carried out by suppliers. To
overcome this problem in the US, a working group representing operators, suppliers,
industry professionals and regulators has produced two strategic documents. Parallel
documents could readily be developed in Europe and would benefit the implementation of
BAT by providing data for future drafts of this document as well as assisting overall
progress towards sustainability such as:
o strategic environmental goals for the sector. A short list of specific environmental goals
(seven were identified in the US), could provide a summary of the environmental
benefits the sector as a whole could achieve using BAT, with the priorities and the time-
scales they could be achieved in
o an industry list of research priorities. An EC list of research priorities for the sector,
which is publicly available to advise universities, research bodies, other research
programmes, etc. This should identify the gaps in knowledge in this document

delivery for future work
In Europe, several co-operative or club activities already assist SMEs in delivering
environmental objectives. This type of club approach could be used to deliver the further
work identified:
o in the UK and the Netherlands, club activities have been organised to enable SMEs to
gain mutual benefits, such as sharing the cost of consultancy advice for environmental
permitting and regulation. In both cases, this has been with the collaboration of
regulators, who also benefited in significant time saving.
o In Italy, ECOMETAL is a non-profit consortium aimed at moving the whole metal
finishing sector into the framework of sustainable development. These types of
activities could be used to deliver some of the proposals here.

increase economic viability of third party recovery
Although outside the scope of this document, third party recovery and disposal has to be
used in many cases. The fragmented nature of the business leads to the disposal of wastes as
hazardous because the quantities are below economically viable recovery. The types of
wastes, their quantities and locations need to be identified so that they may be recoverable
in larger quantities. This development would also lend itself to a club approach. Involving
regulators would assist with regulatory issues, such as transfrontier shipment of wastes,
recognition of activities for recovery and not disposal, etc.

development of the infinitely recyclable concept
The Italian non-profit consortium ECOMETAL has started a project to label goods
infinitely recyclable. This project aims to:
o update knowledge about the recycling of goods made of metals
o investigate alternative processes that are able to increase the percentage of metals that
are recycled
o certify that metallic components are recyclable for manufacturers, producers and
consumers.

The intended output for the first two tasks is the development of protocols that establish the
characteristics that both the base and finishing metals must meet to be suitable for recycling
using simple, economic and reliable techniques.

Chapter 7
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 429
development of performance-based standards to increase acceptance of new
techniques
A barrier to the acceptance of substitute techniques and processes by the sectors customers
was identified during this information exchange: contracts for surface treatment regularly
specify the process. Specifying the process restricts the uptake of substitute processes that
use less toxic materials, and/or have other environmental benefits, such as lower energy
consumption. In reality, the requirements are for performance, such as corrosion resistance,
colour and hardness, etc. There have been some programmes to develop performance-based
standards, but these need to be continued, and accompanied by the development of training
packages for operators and customers to increase the uptake of these standards.

7.5 Suggested topics for future R&D projects

Electroless nickel and copper
Electroless process solutions have a very limited life, unlike electroplating solutions. This is
described by the number of times the amount of metal in solution is applied (metal turnovers,
MTO). MTO is usually 6 8 times or less, depending on the quality required. The electroless
process is also inherently less stable than electrolytic solutions, with more solution being
discarded due to problems. In many cases, the solutions are discarded as hazardous waste, while
containing significant amounts of metals. Research should be carried out to:

extend bath lives in terms of MTO
develop techniques to recycle or re-use the solutions
improve recovery options for metal from discarded baths.

Modulated current techniques and equipment
Modulated current plating techniques are used in high precision applications, such as printed
circuit boards. An emerging technique is described which is under pre-production testing for
plating hard chromium from a trivalent chromium solution. While equipment costs are
estimated to be double, the technique simplifies the chemical requirements, and cuts energy and
chemical consumption significantly. There is a need for further investigation of modulated
current techniques, as the cost of equipment has fallen in real terms, due to the increased
application in PCB manufacture.

New techniques to measure surface area and throughput factors
As noted above, although the industry treats surfaces, usually the surface area of a component is
not usually known. The industry could improve its control of raw materials and energy, as well
as improving quality if the surface area, and therefore the process throughput could be easily
measured. Methods are needed that are rapidly usable and cheap to operate, whether physical,
physico-chemical or software packages that assist the calculation. The methods also need to
establish relationships between surface area and other throughput factors such as weight of
anode material used, weight of substrate throughput, etc.

Improved efficiency of processes
The data supplied showed poor efficiency of some processes (see Chapter 3). Research is
needed to improve the process efficiency or identify suitable substitutes.

The EC is launching and supporting, through its RTD programmes, a series of projects dealing
with clean technologies, emerging effluent treatment and recycling technologies and
management strategies. Potentially these projects could provide a useful contribution to future
document reviews. Readers are therefore invited to inform the EIPPCB of any research results
which are relevant to the scope of this document (see also the preface of this document).

Chapter 7
430 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Substitutes for passivation using hexavalent chromium
The use of hexavalent chromium from passivation left in major product groups is being limited
or banned by two directives (applying to end of life vehicles and waste electrical and electronic
goods). The TWG could not identify substitutes that were BAT and further work is required in
this area, either to identify substitutes for the hexavalent passivation that have less cross-media
effects or to identify surface treatment systems that can be used to replace the systems requiring
passivation.
References
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 431
REFERENCES

1 EC (1996). Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated
pollution prevention and control", Official Journal of the European Communities (OJ),
L257 vol 39, pp. 15.

2 EC (2000). Commission Decision of 17 July 2000 on the implementation of a
European pollutant emission register (EPER) according to Article 15 of Council
Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control C(2000)
2004", Official Journal of the European Communities, L192.

3 CETS (2002). "Reference document on best available techniques for the surface
treatment of plastic and metals using electrolytic or chemical process", CETS.

4 Cramb, A. W. "A Short History of Metals", Carnegie Mellon University,
http://neon.mems.cmu.edu/cramb/Processing/history.html.

5 Hook, P. and Heimlich, J. E. (2003). "A History of Packaging", Ohio State University,
http://ohioline.osu.edu/cd-fact/0133.html.

6 IHOBE (1997). "Recubrimientos Electroliticos", Gobierno Vasco.

8 Nordic-Council (2002). "DEA- an aid for identification of BAT in the inorganic surface
treatment industry", TemaNord, Nordic Council of Ministers, TemaNord 2002:525.

9 ESTAL (2002). "Presentation by ESTAL" ESTAL, Seville.
11 Tempany, P. (2002). "STM TWG kick off meeting report" STM TWG kick off meeting,
Seville.
12 PARCOM (1992). "PARCOM Recommendation 92/4 on the reduction of emissions
from the electroplating industry", PARCOM, 92/4.

13 UNEP; MAP and RAC/CP (2002). "Alternatives for preventing pollution in the surface
treatment industry", RAC/CP (Regional Activity Centre for Cleaner Production of the
Mediterranean Action Plan), UNEP, WAP, Ministry of the Environment Spain,
Government of Catulonia Ministry of the Environment,.

16 RIZA (1999). "Best safety practice for preventing risks of unplanned discharges",
RIZA.

18 Tempany, P. (2002). "Site visit reports, Mission 1 UK", EIPPCB, DG-JRC, EC.

19 Eurofer (2003). "Draft Reference document on best available techniques in the
continuous electrolytic coating of steel", Eurofer.

20 VITO (1998). "Beste Beschikbare Technieken voor het Elektrolytisch behandelen,
chemisch behandelen en ontvetten", VITO.

21 Agences de l'Eau de France; SITS; SATS; CETIM and Ministre de L'Amenagement du
Territoire et de l'Environnement (2002). "Surface Treament Waste water Treatment",
Agence de l'Eau Rhone-Mediterrane-Corse, 2-9506252-3-1 (EN), 2-9506252-2-3 (FR).

22 Fraunhofer (2002). "Comprehensive preliminary studies and proposals for measures of
risk reduction strategies for EDTA", Fraunhofer ISI and Fraunhofer IME, BA.

References
432 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
23 EIPPCB (2002). "Reference Document on Best Available Techniques on Emissions
from Storage", EIPPCB, EC.

24 UBA-Austria (2001). "State-of-the-art for the production of nitric acid with regard to
the IPPC Directive", BA-Austria.

26 Envirowise (2003). "Electroplaters plant performance optimisation tool", DEFRA,
http://www.envirowise.gov.uk/envirowisev3.nsf/Key/CROD4TGK79?OpenDocument.

28 DG-RTD, E. (2002). "EU Workshop on waste prevention and chromium issues in
industrial effluents" EU Workshop on waste prevention and chromium issues in
industrial effluents, Lulea, Sweden.
29 EA (2001-3). "IPPC: Interim guidance for Surface treatment of metals or plastics - by
chemical or electrolytic means, Draft", Environment Agency for England and Wales,
SEPA, NIESH.

30 EC (2003). Council Directive 2003/53/EC of 18 June 2003 amending for the 26th time
the Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on marketing and use of
certain substances and preparations (nonylphenol, nonyl phenol ethoxylate and
cement)", Official Journal of the European Union (OJ), pp. 4.

31 Biowise (2001). "Biological solution for cheaper metal cleaning", Department of Trade
and Industry, Case study 6.

34 Brett, P. C. (2002). "Electrolytic processes", IUPAC, personal communication.

35 Columbia (2002). "Electrolysis", Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th Edn.

36 IUPAC (1997). "Compendium of Chemical Technology: IUPACRecommendations,
2nd edn 1997", IUPAC, ISBN 0865426848.

38 Ullmann (2002/3). "Ullman's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 6th edn, 2001
electronic release".

39 (1993). "Dictionary of Science", Penguin, 0-14-051262-4.

41 (2003). "Gold facts", Fine Things, www.finethingsjewelry.com.

42 SEA (2001). "Code of Good Safety Practice for the Surface Finishing Industry",
Surface Engineering Association, Environment Agency, SEPA, HSE.

43 SEA (2001). "Trivalent Chromium for a safer workplace and environment", SEA.

44 France, T. (2003). "Accidents", French national technical working group for IPPC in the
surface treatment of metals and plastics.

45 France, T. (2003). "Aluminium anodising".

46 France, T. (2003). "Cleaning degreasing solutions by centrifuge".

47 France, T. (2003). "Chemical milling".

48 France, T. (2003). "Closed loop chromium plating".

49 France, T. (2003). "Copper recovery by electrodeposition".

References
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 433
51 France, T. (2003). "Emission levels".

53 France, T. (2003). "Recovery systems for aluminium from anodising".

55 France, T. (2003). "Nickel recovery by reverse osmosis".

56 France, T. (2003). "Self monitoring".

57 France, T. (2003). "Static separator for degreasing activities".

58 France, T. (2003). "French regulations for surface treatment activities".

59 France, T. (2003). "Ultrafiltration of degreasing solutions".

60 Hemsley, D. (2003). The PPC Regulations and their impact on the chemical
engineering of process plating plant", Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing
(UK), 81(3), pp. 4.

61 EC (2002). "Definition of small and medium enterprises (SME)", European
Commission, http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/consultations/sme__.

62 France, T. (2003). Recovery systems for aluminium in anodising".

65 Atotech (2001). "Integrated vertical systems for pcb production - Aurotech".

66 PPRC (2003). "Chromium electroplating and anodising tanks", Pacific Northwest
Pollution Resource Center, www.pprc.org/pprc/sbap/facts/chrome.html.

67 IAMS (2003). "A Pollution Prevention Resource Manual for Metal Finishers", Institue
of Advanced Manufacturing Sciences, Inc.

68 USEPA (2003). "Research in support of the metal finishing industry", USEPA,
www.epa.gov.gov/ORD/NRMRL/std/mtb/metal_finishing.htm.

69 NCDPPEA (2003). "Overview of the Metal Finishing Industry", North Carolina
Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance,
www.p2pays.org/ref/03/02454/overview.htm.

70 Ellis, J. B. (2001). "Sewer infiltration/exfiltration and interactions with sewer flows and
groundwater quality" Interurba II, Lisbon, Portugal.
71 BSTSA "Metal Pre-treatment".

73 BSTSA "Electroless Nickel".

74 BSTSA "Hard Chromium".

75 BSTSA "Precious Metals".

76 BSTSA "Laquers for Metal Finishing".

77 BSTSA "Electroplated Plastic Components".

78 BSTSA "Zinc Plating".

80 INRS "Guide pratique de ventilation: Cuves de traitmentsde surface", 2.

References
434 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
81 INRS (1998). "Ateliers de traitement de surface: Prvention des risques chimiques", ED
827.

82 Agences de l'Eau (1996). "Prevention des pollutions accidentelles dans les industries de
la chimie, du traitement de surface, etc.".

85 EIPPCB "Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Industrial Cooling
Systems", EC.

86 EIPPCB "Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Ferrous Metals
Processing Industry", EC.

87 EIPPCB "Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Waste Water and
Waste Gas Treatment/ Management Systems in the Chemical Sector", EC.

88 EIPPCB "Reference Document on Best Available Techniques on Economics and Cross-
Media Effects", EC.

89 EIPPCB "Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Waste Treatment
Industries", EC.

90 EIPPCB "Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Surface Treatment
using Solvents", EC.

91 EIPPCB "Reference Document on the General Principles of Monitoring", EC.

92 EC (1991). Council Directive of 12 December 1991 on hazardous waste", Official
Journal of the European Communities, L377.

93 EC (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23
October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water
policy", Official Journal of the European Communities, L327, pp. 72.

94 EC (1999). Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste",
Official Journal of the European Communities, 182.

95 EC (1986). Council Directive of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment
and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture", Official Journal
of the European Communities, L181.

96 EC (2003). Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27
January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)", Official Journal
of the European Communities, L37.

97 EC (1999). Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March 1999 on the limitations of
emissions of volatile organic carbon compounds due to the use of organic solvents in
certain activities and installations", Official Journal of the European Communities (OJ),
L85.

98 EC (2003). Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27
January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical
and electronic equipment", Official Journal of the European Communities (OJ).
99 EC (2000). Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18
September 2000 on end-of-life-vehicles", Official Journal of the European
Communities (OJ), L269.

References
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 435
100 EC (2000). The Hazardous Waste List: Commission Decision (2000/532/EC) of 3 May
2000 replacing Decision 94/3/EC establishing a list of wastes pursuant to Article 1(a) of
Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and.....", Official Journal of the European
Communities, L226.

101 CEN (2000). "Corrosion protection of metals and alloys - Surface treatment, metallic
and other inorganic coatings - Vocabulary: EN 12508", CEN, 0 580 34230 1.

103 EC (1991). Council Directive of 18 March 1991 amending Directive 75/442/EEC on
waste", Official Journal of the European Communities, L78.

104 UBA (2003). "Draft German BREF: Treatment of metallic and non-metallic surfaces
with chemical and electrochemical procedures", BA.

105 EC (1967). Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of
laws, regulations, and administrative provisiosn relating to the classification, packaging
and labelling of dangerous substances (as amended)", Official Journal of the European
Communities, P 196, 16/08/1967 p.0001-0008.

106 NCMS (2003). "Recent Alternatives for chromate coatings", National Centre for
Manufacturing Sciences, USA, http:/chromate.ncms.org/about.htm.

108 NEWMOA (2003). "Trivalent chromium replacements for hexavalent chromium
plating", North East Waste Management Officials'Organisation.

109 DEFRA (2004). "Perflurooctane sulphonate Risk reduction strategy and analysis of
advantages and drawbacks & review of environmental risks - Stage 3 report", DEFRA,
j454/PFOS RRS.

110 BEWT (2003). "Chemelec cell", BEWT, personal communication.

111 ACEA (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

112 Assogalvanica (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft1".

113 Austria (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

114 Belgium (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

115 CETS (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

116 Czech-Republic (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

118 ESTAL (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

119 Eurofer (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft1".

120 Finland (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

121 France (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

122 UBA (2003). "Draft German BREF: Printed circuit board manufacture", BA.

123 UBA (2004). "German reference plants", BA Germany, personal communication.

124 Germany (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft1".

References
436 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
125 Ireland (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

126 Netherlands (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

127 Oekopol (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

128 Portugal (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

129 Spain (2003). "Comments on STM BREF draft 1".

131 OSPAR (2002 ongoing). "List of substances of possible concern", OSPAR, 2002-17.

132 Sheasby, P. G. and Pinner, R. (2002). "The surface treatment and finishing of
aluminium and its alloys 6th edn Vol 1", Finishising Publications Ltd., SG1 4BL UK,
ASM International, Ohio 44073-0001 USA, ISBN 0904477231.

133 Hensel, K. B. (2002). "Electropolishing, Metal finishing guidebook and directory, Vol
100, 1A".

134 CEN/BSI (1997). "Electropolishing", CEN, BSI, BS EN 3769: 1997.

135 Swain, J. (1996). Electropolishing stainless steel for the pharmaceutical, food and
beverage industries", Surface World, May 1996.

136 Webber, J. and Nathan, S. (2000). A process with POLISH", Process Engineering,
April 2000.

137 ISO/BSI (2000). "Electropolishing", ISO, BSI and other standards organisations, BS
ISO 15739: 2000.

138 QUALANOD (1999). "Specifications for the quality label for Anodic Coatings on
Wrought Aluminium for Architectural Purposes", QUALANOD, Edition: October
1999.

139 Wikipedia (2004). "Printed circuit board", Wikipedia,
http://en.wikipedia.og/wiki/Printed_circuit_board.

140 Atotech (2003). "Integrated chromium plating plant - Dynachrome".

142 EC (1996). Council directive on the control of major-accident hazards involving
dangerous substances, amendment 2003/105/EC", OJ.
143 EC (2001). Commission decision 2455/2001/EC Establishing a list of priority
substances in the water field", OJ.
144 EC (1976). Council directive of 27 July 1976 on the approximation o f the laws.
regulations and administrative procedures of the Member States relating to restrictions
on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations 7/769/EEC",
OJ, OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p 201.

145 LeCarre (2004). "Surface area calculation", Agence de l'Eau Seine Normandie,
personal communication.

146 ZVO (2003). "Decorative high gloss chromium plating and functional chromium
plating", ZVO.

References
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 437
147 CETS (2004). "Technical arguments for chromium plating from trivalent and
hexavalent electrolytes", CETS.

148 HTMLA (2003). "Fact sheet: plating with trivalent chrome", Hazard and toxic materials
office, Board of Public Works, City of Los Angeles, http://es.epa.gov/techinfo/ca-
htm/htmfact9.html.

149 PPT (2004). "Replacing hexavalent chromium",
http://www.nam.org?PPT/autopanelpresentation.ppt.

150 Rowan (2003). "Chrome plating alternatives", Rowan Technology Group,
http://www.rowantechnology.com/Tech-Info.htm.

152 ESTAL (2004). "ESTAL TWG supplementary information", ESTAL, personal
communication.

154 NMFRC (2004). "Pollution prevention and control technologies for plating sources
(NCMS-NAMF Blue Book)", National Metal Finishing Resource Centre,
http://www.nmfrc.org/bluebook/tocmain.htm.

155 EIPPCB "Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Non Ferrous
Metals Industries", EC.

156 France, T. (2003). "Water Treatment".

157 ACEA (2004). "Comments on STM BREF draft 2".

158 Portugal (2004). "Comments on STM BREF draft 2".

159 TWG (2004). Comments on STM BREF draft 2".

160 ESTAL (2004). "Comments on STM BREF Draft 2".

161 Assogalvanica (2004). "Comments on STM Draft 2".

162 USEPA (2000). "Approaching zero discharge in surface finishing", USEPA,
EPA/625/R-99/008.

163 Gock and Schlmrosczyk (2004). Aufbereitung von Phosphatierschlmmen aus der
Automobilindustrie", Stoffstrommanagement, pp. 895-899.

164 Wittel (2004). "Phosphating", Chemetall GmbH, personal communication.

165 Tempany (2004). "Final TWG meeting report".

166 RIZA (2004). "Cross-media analysis and provisioanl cost calculation of the re-use of
rinse water in chemical nickel plating", RIZA, RIZA werkdoucment nr. 2004.096x.

Glossary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 439
GLOSSARY

General Glossary

1. General terms, abbreviations, acronyms and substances

ENGLISH TERM MEANING
A
A ampere
ABS any of the class of plastics based on acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene
copoloymers
A/dm
2
, A/m
2
amperes per square decimetre, amperes per square metre. A measure of
current density at the electrode.
AC alternating current
acid proton donor. A substance that, more or less readily, gives off hydrogen
ions in a water solution
ACGHI American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. This
organisation produces various standards for industrial
hygiene/workplace safety
achieved
environmental
benefits
(See Chapter 4)
main environmental impact(s) to be addressed by the technique (process
or abatement), including emission values achieved and efficiency
performance. Environmental benefits of the technique in comparison
with others
acute effect an adverse effect on any living organism in which severe symptoms
develop rapidly and often subside after the exposure stops.
acute pollution pollution arising from infrequent events, unplanned events or accidents
(see also: chronic pollution)
acute toxicity adverse effects that result from a single dose or single exposure of a
chemical; any poisonous effect produced within a short period, usually
less than 96 hours. This term is normally used to describe effects in
experimental animals.
aeration the act of mixing a liquid with air (oxygen).
aerobic a biological process that occurs in the presence of oxygen
air knife a machine using low pressure, high volume air emitted through
precision slits, giving a laminar air curtain. Components can be passed
through this curtain, either manually or on a conveyor belt, or as a coil.
The air heats up due to compression and movement in the system, and
this warms oils and greases, assisting their removal. Both the air
movement and the temperature facilitates drying of components. Also
used in other industries, such as for finishing chocolates
alkali proton acceptor. A substance that, more or less readily, takes up
hydrogen ions in a water solution.
anaerobic a biological process that occurs in the absence of oxygen.
anion a negatively charged ion; an ion that is attracted to towards the anode in
electrochemical reactions
anode positive electrode
anodising (GB)
anodizing (US)
anodic oxidation. Electrolytic process in which the surface layer of a
metal, such as aluminium, magnesium or zinc is converted to a coating,
usually an oxide, having protective, decorative or functional properties
[101, CEN, 2000]
AOCl adsorbable organic chlorine compounds
AOX adsorbable organic halogen compounds. The total concentration in
milligrams per litre, expressed as chlorine, of all halogen compounds
(except fluorine) present in a sample of water that are capable of being
adsorbed on activated carbon.
Glossary
440 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
APE alkyl phenol ethoxylates
applicability (see
Chapter 4)

Consideration of the factors involved in applying and retrofitting the
technique (e.g. space availability, process specific)
aquifer a water-bearing layer of rock (including gravel and sand) that will yield
water in usable quantity to a well or spring.
assimilative capacity the ability of a natural body of water to receive waste waters or toxic
materials without harmful effects and without damage to aquatic life
ATBC acetyl tributyl citrate
autocatalytic plating deposition of a metallic coating by a controlled chemical reduction that
is catalysed by the metal or alloy being deposited [101, CEN, 2000]
B
bactericide a pesticide used to control or destroy bacteria
barrel Also called or translated as drum. A rotating container used to contain
workpieces when they are treated in bulk:
barrel processing surface treatment activities carried out using barrels. For example,
barrel cleaning, barrel electroplating
BAT best available techniques
bath a solution of chemicals for a specific surface treatment activity, e.g.
pickling bath. Also refers to the relevant vat or workstation in a process
sequence
BF batch wise flocculation
big bag, or bulk bag large bag for containing and/or delivering solids. Usually contains
approximately one tonne depending on the material density and is
designed to be compatible with pallet handing systems
biodegradable that can be broken down physically and/or chemically by micro-
organisms. For example, many chemicals, food scraps, cotton, wool and
paper are biodegradable.
BOD biochemical oxygen demand: the quantity of dissolved oxygen required
by micro-organisms in order to decompose organic matter. The unit of
measurement is mg O
2
/l. In Europe, BOD is usually measured after 3
(BOD
3
), 5 (BOD
5
) or 7 (BOD
7
) days.
BREF BAT reference document
bulk bag see big bag
C
caroat potassium monopersulphate
CASS copper accelerated salt spray test. A standard corrosion test
cathode negative electrode
cation a positively charged ion: an ion that is attracted towards the cathode in
electrochemical reactions
CF continuous flocculation
CNC computer numeric control
COD chemical oxygen demand: the amount of potassium dichromate,
expressed as oxygen, required to oxidise chemically, at about 150 C,
substances contained in waste water. However, CODCr also includes
any inorganic reducing agents present.. High Chloride (>1000mg/l also
interferes with the results. The ISO standard for COD is ISO
15705:2002. TOC is also a measure of organic compounds in waste
water
CPI corrugated plate interceptor - oil separation device utilizing inclined
corrugated plates to separate free non-emulsified oil and water based on
their density difference
chelating agent a compound capable of chelation with metal ions.
Glossary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 441
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
chelation the formation of a closed ring of atoms by the attachment of compounds
or radicals to a central polyvalent metal ion (occasionally non-metallic).
chronic pollution pollution occurring from regular or continuous events, such as effluent
discharge (see acute pollution)
coil processing processing of continuous coils of substrate. The largest scale activities
are for steel (up to 2080 mm wide) or aluminium, although copper,
brass, nickel, and zinc are also processed in coils. Coils can also be on a
smaller scale (a few mm wide) for decorative trim
complexing agent see chelating agent
containment,
contained area
(secondary) containment refers to additional protection against storage
tank releases over and above the inherent protection provided by the
tank container itself. There are two major types of secondary
containment for leakages, namely those that are part of the tank
construction, such as, double tank bottoms (only for aboveground
tanks), double skinned and double walled tanks and impervious barriers
which are placed upon the soil surface below the tanks [90, EIPPCB, ]
corrosion surface chemical reaction especially on metals, by the action of
moisture, air or chemicals.
cross-media effects
(See Chapter 4)
Any side-effects and disadvantages caused by implementation of the
technique. Details on the environmental problems of the technique in
comparison with others
D
DAF dissolved air flotation
DC direct current (electrical supply)
DDC dithiocarbamate
deburring removal of burrs or sharp edges by electropolishing, grinding, linishing
or pickling
DEA Data envelope analysis; a method of benchmarking and/or analysing
data
de-embrittlement a specific type of embrittlement of a metal or alloy caused by absorption
of atomic hydrogen, for example, during electroplating, cathodic
cleaning, or pickling processes and manifested by delayed fracture,
brittle fracture or a reduction of ductility [101, CEN, 2000]
description
(see Chapter 4)
Technical description of the technique
dialysis a separation technique: the separation of colloids in solution from other
dissolved substances by selective diffusion through a membrane
diffuse emission emissions arising from direct contact of volatile or light dusty
substances with the environment (atmosphere, under normal operating
circumstances). These can result from:
inherent design of the equipment (e.g. filters, driers, etc.)
operating conditions (e.g. during transfer of material between
containers)
type of operation (e.g. maintenance activities), or
from a gradual release to other media (e.g. to cooling water or
waste water).
Fugitive emissions are a subset of diffuse emissions.
diffuse sources sources of similar diffuse or direct emissions which are multiple and
distributed inside a defined area
displacement
coating
see immersion coating
DNC direct or distributed numeric control. A system where a NC program is
sent from a PC to a CNC machine.
DOS dioxyl sebacate
Glossary
442 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
drag-in liquid (from a previous bath) carried into a bath by the workpieces or
substrate introduced during treatment
drag-out liquid carried out of a bath by the workpieces or substrate during
treatment
driving force for
implementation
(see Chapter 4)
reasons for implementation of the technique (e.g. other legislation,
improvement in production quality)
DS dry solids (content). The mass of a material remaining after drying by
the standard method of test
DSA dimensionally stable anodes. Metal anodes that are not consumed
during use as graphite anodes are, hence dimensionally stable.
E
EC50 effect concentration 50. The concentration at which effects are observed
in 50 % of the test population after administering a single dose. Effects
include the immobilisation of daphnia, inhibition of growth, cell
division or biomass production, or the production of chlorophyll by
algae.
ECCS electro-chemical chromium plating
Economics
(see Chapter 4)
information on costs (investment and operation) and any possible
savings (e.g. reduced raw material consumption, waste charges) also as
related to the capacity of the technique
EDT
EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. An important chelating agent
EDDS ethylene diamine disuccinate
eco rinse a static rinse tank where workpieces are passed through before and after
plating, allowing the collected drag-out to be re-used as drag-in
effluent physical fluid (air or water together with contaminants) forming an
emission
EIPPCB European IPPC Bureau
electrode a conductor by which an electric current enters or leaves an electrolyte
in an electro-chemical reaction (or an electric arc or a vacuum tube)
[101, CEN, 2000], See anode and cathode
electrogalvanising a term often used to translate the German galvanische
Metallabscheidung, or similar terms from other languages. Should not
be used in English, as it is easily confused with hot dip galvanising.
electroless plating see autocatalytic plating. Use of this term discouraged [CEN, 2000 #101
electrolyte a substance that is capable of conducting an electric current in solution
or fused state
electroplating electrodeposition of an adherent metallic coating upon an electrode for
the purpose of securing a surface with properties or dimensions
different from those of the base metal (see electrogalvanising,
galvanising. German = galvanische Metallabscheidung).
Note: plating alone cannot be used in this sense. [101, CEN, 2000]
electropolishing smoothing and brightening of a metal surface by making it anodic in an
appropriate solution [101, CEN, 2000]
emerging techniques Novel techniques that are relevant to the document (see the BREF
outline and Guide). The name of the standard chapter in BREFs where
novel techniques are identified.
emission the direct or indirect release of substances, vibrations, heat or noise
from individual or diffuse sources in the installation into the air, water
or land
consumption and
emission levels
associated with the

Glossary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 443
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
use of BAT
emission limit
values
the mass, expressed in terms of certain specific parameters,
concentration and/or level of an emission, which may not be exceeded
during one or more periods of time
EMS environmental management system
end-of-pipe
technique
a technique that reduces final emissions or consumptions by some
additional process but does not change the fundamental operation of the
core process. Synonyms: "secondary technique", "abatement
technique". Antonyms: "process-integrated technique", "primary
technique" (a technique that in some way changes the way in which the
core process operates thereby reducing raw emissions or consumptions)
ENSA ethoxylated alpha-naphthol sulphonic acid
EOP, EoP, eop end-of-pipe
EP electrostatic precipitator
etching In general, the removal of part of a metal surface by the action of acid
or alkali. This can be used to describe the removal of the top surface of
metal, together with dirt and oxides, etc, prior to subsequent treatment.
Used before anodizing, etching employs an alkaline solution where
micro galvanic activity at the alloy surface leads to the development of
a matt appearance. [118, ESTAL, 2003]
EU-15 the 15 Member States at 26 June 2002. Most of the data in this
document pre-dates the EU-25. Data from the new Member States is
indicated where it is provided.
eutrophication the pollution of a body of water by sewage, fertilisers washed from the
land, and industrial wastes (inorganic nitrates and phosphates). These
compounds stimulate the growth of algae, reducing the oxygen content
in the water, and so killing animals with a high oxygen requirement.
example plants
(see Chapter 4)
reference to a plant where the technique is reported to be used
existing installation an installation in operation or, in accordance with legislation existing
before the date on which this Directive is brought into effect, an
installation authorized or in the view of the competent authority the
subject of a full request for authorisation, provided that that installation
is put into operation no later than one year after the date on which this
Directive is brought into effect
F
flight bar the assembly used both to move the jigs through the core process steps
and (where the processes depends on electrical current) to carry the
electrical current to the jig
flocculation the coagulation of finely divided particles into particles of greater mass
[39, 1993]
fugitive emission emission caused by non-tight equipment/leak: emission into the
environment resulting from a gradual loss of tightness from a piece of
equipment designed to contain an enclosed fluid (gaseous or liquid).
Fundamentally caused by a difference of pressure and a resulting leak.
Examples of fugitive emissions: leak from a flange, a pump, a sealed or
tightened equipment
G
galvanising In UK English: hot dip metal coating (German: Schelztauchberzug;
French: galvanisation chaud).
A term often used to wrongly translate the German galvanische
Metallabscheidung, or similar words from other languages. This term
should be translated into English by electroplating

Glossary
444 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
global warming greenhouse effect: The short wave solar radiation passes through the
Earths atmosphere but after being reradiated by its surface as infrared
radiation, some of it is absorbed by gases in the atmosphere causing a
rise in temperature (known as global warming. It is calculated that 55 %
of global warming is caused by absorption of energy by CO
2.
The
remaining 45 % is caused mainly by energy absorption by methane and
damage to the ozone layer as a result of the use of various VOX
H
HC Hydrocarbon
HDI High density interconnects. A type of printed circuit board with
multiple layers and a high density of interconnections between the
layers.
I
IEF Information Exchange Forum (informal consultation body in the
framework of the IPPC Directive)
immersion coating metal produced by a replacement reaction in which one metal is
replaced by another from the solution [101, CEN, 2000]. For example:
Fe + Cu
2+
YCu + Fe
2+

(also known as displacement coating)
installation in the IPPC Directive, a stationary technical unit where one or more
activities listed in Annex I are carried out, and any other directly
associated activities which have a technical connection with the
activities carried out on that site and which could have an effect on
emissions and pollution
IPPC integrated pollution prevention and control
J
Jig, or rack a frame for suspending workpieces during surface treatment activities.
In electrochemical activities, the rack also carries current to the
workpieces
JIT just-in-time; a manufacturing management technique, when components
are delivered for the next stage of assembly just as they are needed, and
not held in stock
jobbing shop,
job shop
specialist surface treatment company operating as a sub-contractor in
the engineering industries
K
Knoop Knoop units are a measure of hardness
L
LAS linear alkylbenzene sulphonate
LC50 lethal concentration 50. The lowest concentration of a substance in
water or ambient air in milligrams per litre sufficient to cause death in
50 % of the test population within a defined period (e.g. 96 hours for
fish, 48 hours for daphnia).
LD50 lethal dose 50. The lowest dose of a substance administered to species
such as mice and rats sufficient to cause death in 50 % of the test
population within a defined period (no more than 14 days), expressed in
milligrams of test substance per kilogram of bodyweight.
legionella (English)

a genus of gram-negative bacilli that includes species that cause
Legionnaires disease (lgionellose, French; Legionrskrankheit,
German, legionela sometimes in Spanish)
Glossary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 445
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
linishing directional grinding of flat surfaces by means of an abrasive bonded to
an endless flexible belt (US: graining) [101, CEN, 2000]
looper unit unit in coil coating that contains loops of the continuous substrate. In
entry loopers the length of the loops is decreased, allowing the end of
the substrate to remain motionless when attaching a new coil; in exit
loopers the loops are increased in length while holding the receiving
coil motionless while cutting the end of a completed roll
LPG liquified petroleum gas. A mixture of petroleum gases, usually propane
and butane, that is stored under pressure as a liquid
M
MAC maximum allowable concentration
macrothrowing
power
ability of an electroplating solution to produce a coating with a surface
smoother than that of the substrate. cf. throwing power [101, CEN,
2000]
metallizing
metallising

application of a metallic coating to the surface of non-metallic material

Note: It is recommended to restrict the term metallizing to this meaning
and in particular not to use it as a synonym for metal spraying or in the
sense of depositing a metallic layer on a metallic substrate [101, CEN,
2000]
microelectronics the brand of electronics that deals with miniature components
microrough microscopic irregularities in the surface of a material
microthrowing
power
ability of an electroplating solution under a specific set of conditions to
deposit metal in pores or scratches
Note: Good microthrowing power does not necessarily imply good
macrothrowing power [101, CEN, 2000]
MLB Mulit-layer board. A printed circuit board with more than one layer.
monitoring process intended to assess or to determine the actual value and the
variations of an emission or another parameter, based on procedures of
systematic, periodic or spot surveillance, inspection, sampling and
measurement or another assessment methods intended to provide
information about emitted quantities and/or trends for emitted pollutants
MSA methane sulphonic acid
MTO metal turnover. The number of times the original quantity of metal in a
bath is replenished (or turned over) by additions
multi-media effects where effects can apply to more than one media, e.g. to air and water.
See cross-media effects
N
n/a not applicable OR not available (depending on the context)
NC numerically controlled
n/d no data
NO
x
oxides of nitrogen
NPE nonyl phenyl ethoxylate
NTA nitriloacetic acid
O
O&M operations and maintenance in this document. (May also mean
organisation and methods, relating to work planning)
OEM original equipment manufacturer. a company that supplies equipment to
other companies to resell or incorporate into another product using the
reseller's brand name, e.g. the manufacturer of components to major
automotive manufacturers

Glossary
446 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
operational data
(see Chapter 4)
performance data on emissions/wastes and consumption (raw materials,
water and energy). Any other useful information on how to operate,
maintain and control the technique, including safety aspects, operability
constraints of the technique, output quality, etc.
operator any natural or legal person who operates or controls the installation or,
where this is provided for in national legislation, to whom decisive
economic power over the technical functioning of the installation has
been delegated
OSPAR the 1992 OSPAR Convention, combined the 1972 Oslo Convention on
dumping of waste at sea and PARCOM (see below). The work under
the Convention is managed by the OPSAR Commission
P
PARCOM the 1974 Paris Convention on land-based sources of marine pollution.
The PARCOM Commission was the forum through which the
Contracting Parties cooperated. It has now been superceded by the 1992
OSPAR Convention (see above)
Pcb, PCB (i) printed circuit board. An electronic circuit in which the wiring
between components and certain fixed components themselves are
printed on an insulating board. (Notes: 1. This is the main use in this
document. 2. Flexible films and other substrates can be instead of
insulating board) [39, 1993]

(ii) polychlorinated biphenyl. Chlorinated derivatives of biphenyl.
Bioaccumulable toxic compounds use din synthetic resins and as
electrical insulators. The only use in this document is discussing
chemicals potentially used in installations of this sector (see Section
4.1.1.1) [39, 1993]
PFOS
Perfluorooctane sulphonate: a surfactant. See Annex 8.2
pickling
for metal: removal of oxides or other compounds from a metal surface
by chemical or electrochemical action [101, CEN, 2000]
for plastic: a mixture of chromic and sulphuric acid applied to ABS-
type plastic surfaces to oxidise and dissolve the butadiene component,
thus generating a microrough surface as part of the preparation for
autocatalytic plating
(German: Beizen, although Dekapieren seems to fit the same
description)
plant machinery or factory. A large item of equipment or an assembly of
equipment, e.g. a plant for sub-contact surface treatment, a plant for
chromium electroplating
plating A widely used abbreviation of electroplating, which is the more
correct term
PSA phenyl sulphonic acid
PI process-integrated
polishing,
mechanical
smoothing of a metal surface by action of abrasive particles
pollutant individual substance or group of substances which can harm or affect
the environment
primary
measure/technique
a technique that in some way changes the way in which the core process
operates thereby reducing raw emissions or consumptions (see end-of-
pipe technique)
profiles,
architectural
workpieces and substrate manufactured to specific cross-sectional
dimensions and cut to size for assembly and use in the building
construction industry. For example, door and window frames

Glossary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 447
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
PS presensitised; used in this document with lithographic plates which are
surface treated with a photosensitive coating as part of the
manufacturing process, and prior to distribution.
PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
pth plating through hole. This is a technique for Printed Circuit Boards.
Plating through the holes provides electrically conductive connections
between the conductor tracking planes on both sides of a double sided
board or between the multiple tracking planes of Multi layer Boards
(MLBs)
Note: do not confuse with through hole construction, which is a type of
PCB construction where the wires of components are placed through
holes drilled through the board. This has now largely been superseded
by surface mounted components.
Q
QAC quaternary ammonium compound
QMS quality management system
R
rack, or jig frame for suspending workpieces during surface treatment activities. In
electrochemical activities, the rack also carries current to the
workpieces
reference conditions conditions that are specified, e.g. in connection with operating a
process, collecting samples, etc.
reflow the melting of an electroplated tin coating to give a bright finish
rectification Rectification is the reworking of products with reject quality surface
treatment to the required specification. In practice, the terms reworking
and stripping are sometimes confused and may be used to indicate both
activities.

rinse criterion Rinse ratio of contaminant to solvent, usually water, to be achieved
Rz Measure of roughness of a surface
S
secondary
measure/technique
see end-of-pipe technique
sequestration The process of locking up metal ions in co-ordination compounds to
make them ineffective. the sequestering agents used for this purpose are
usually chelating agents
SME small and medium enterprise(s), see [61, EC, 2002]
solubility product the product of the concentrations of the ions of a dissolved electrolyte
when in equilibrium with undissolved substance
specific emission emission related to a reference basis, such as production capacity, or
actual production (e.g. mass per tonne or per unit produced)
SPC statistical process control; a process management technique. Regular
measurements of process parameters (such as bath temperature, pH,
concentration of key process components) are analysed on a continuous
basis to ensure compliance within statistical parameters (such as 3 x the
standard deviation) to control the quality of the process
SS suspended solids (content) (in water) (See also TSS)
strip, stripping process or solution used for the removal of a coating from a base metal
or undercoat. See rectification
STM surface treatment of metals and plastics. Refers to topics within the
scope of this document
Glossary
448 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
ENGLISH TERM MEANING
T
TA Luft German Federal Regulation for control of pollution to air
TDS total dissolved solids
throwing power improvement of coating (usually metal) distribution over that given by
the primary current distribution on an electrode (usually a cathode) in a
given solution, under specified conditions. Note: the term may also be
used for anodic processes for which the term is analogous such as:
macrothrowing power
[101, CEN, 2000]
TOC total organic carbon: a measure of organic compounds in waste waters.
Does not include other reducing agents in the determination (unlike
CODCr). The European Standard method for total organic carbon
(TOC) is; EN 1484
TS total solids (content). Solid content before drying of the material
TSS total suspended solids (content) (in water) (See also SS)
tumbling bulk processing in barrels in either the presence of abrasives or
burnishing shot for the purpose of improving the surface finish
TWG technical working group
U
unplanned release an emission that is not planned for, and is therefore not authorised by a
permit. For example, a spillage of a liquid that travels to surface or
groundwater, or a discharge to a waste water treatment plant that
exceeds the planned capacity of the treatment. It may be acute (i.e.
happening in a short period of time, often called an accidental emission,
such as a spillage) or chronic (i.e. happening over a long period of time,
such as leak from a tank)
US (i) American English
(ii) United States of America
uv ultraviolet light
V
valorise to get the value from, or add value to, something,. For example, valorise
a sludge containing metals by using the sludge as a raw material in a
metallurgical plant (a smelter), and recovering the metals
VHN Vickers Hardness Number (measurement of hardness)
vs. versus: used to compare two ideas or sets of data, etc.
V.I. viscosity index
VOC volatile organic compounds (includes VOX and non-VOX compounds)
VOX volatile organic halogenated compounds
W
WHB waste heat boiler
WWTP waste water treatment plant
weak emulsion
solution
a weakly emulsifying solution used for degreasing. The oils in the
solution can be easily removed enabling the cleaned solution to be re-
used ((demulgen is one trade name)
wetting agent substance that reduces the surface tension of a liquid. This allows the
liquid to spread more easily and more uniformly on a solid surface
X
Y
Z
Glossary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 449
2. Common units, measurements and symbols

TERM MEANING
A ampere
AC Alternating current
ACkWh kilowatt-hours (alternating current)
amp ampere
A/dm
2
,
A/m
2
amperes per square decimetre, amperes per square
metre. A measure of current density at the electrode.
atm normal atmosphere (1 atm = 101325 N/m
2
)
bar bar (1013 bar = 1 atm)
barg bar gauge (bar + 1 atm)
C degree Celsius
cgs centimetre gram second. A system of measurements
now largely replaced by SI.
cm centimetre
cSt centistokes = 10
-2
stokes
d day
DC direct current
g gram
GJ gigajoule
Hz hertz
h hour
ha hectare (10
4
m
2
) (=247105 acres)
J Joule
K kelvin (0 C = 273.15 K)
k kiloamp(ere)
kcal kilocalorie (1 kcal = 4.19 kJ)
kg kilogram (1 kg = 1000 g)
kJ kilojoule (1 kJ = 0.24 kcal)
kPa kilopascal
kt kilotonne
kWh kilowatt-hour (1 kWh = 3600 kJ = 3.6 MJ)
l Litre
m metre
m
2
square metre
m
3
cubic metre
mg milligram (1 mg = 10
-3
gram)
MJ megajoule (1 MJ = 1000 kJ = 10
6
joule)
ml millilitre
mm millimetre (1 mm = 10
-3
m)
m/min metres per minute
Mt megatonne (1 Mt = 10
6
tonne)
Mt/yr megatonnes per year
mV millivolts
MW
e
megawatts electric (energy)
MW
th
megawatts thermal (energy)
ng nanogram (1 ng = 10
-9
gram)
Nm
3
normal cubic metre (101325 kPa, 273 K)
Pa pascal
Poise viscosity measurement: 1 Poise = 0.1 Pascal second
ppb parts per billion
ppm parts per million (by weight)
ppmv parts per million (by volume)
Glossary
450 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
TERM MEANING
s second
S siemens, the SI unit measure of conductance
St stokes. An old, cgs unit of kinematic viscosity.
1 St = 10
-6
m
2
/s
t metric tonne (1000 kg or 10
6
gram)
t/d tonnes per day
t/yr tonne(s) per year
V volt
vol-% percentage by volume. (Also % v/v)
W watt (1 W = 1 J/s)
wt-% percentage by weight. (Also % w/w)
yr year
val/l valency per litre
~ around; more or less
wT increase of temperature
m micrometre (1 m= 10
-6
m)

ohm, unit of electrical resistance

cm ohm centimetre, unit of specific resistance
% v/v percentage by volume. (Also vol-%)
% w/w percentage by weight. (Also wt-%)
Glossary
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 451
3. List of chemical elements

NAME SYMBOL NAME SYMBOL
actinium Ac mercury Hg
aluminium Al molybdenum Mo
americium Am neodymium Nd
antimony Sb neon Ne
argon Ar neptunium Np
arsenic As nickel Ni
astatine At niobium Nb
barium Ba nitrogen N
berkelium Bk nobelium No
beryllium Be osmium Os
bismuth Bi oxygen O
boron B palladium Pd
bromine Br phosphorus P
cadmium Cd platinum Pt
calcium Ca plutonium Pu
californium Cf polonium Po
carbon C potassium K
cerium Ce praseodymium Pr
caesium Cs promethium Pm
chlorine Cl protactinium Pa
chromium Cr radium Ra
cobalt Co radon Rn
copper Cu rhenium Re
curium Cm rhodium Rh
dysprosium Dy rubidium Rb
einsteinium Es ruthenium Ru
erbium Er rutherfordium Rf
europium Eu samarium Sm
fermium Fm scandium Sc
fluorine F selenium Se
francium Fr silicon Si
gadolinium Gd silver Ag
gallium Ga sodium Na
germanium Ge strontium Sr
gold Au sulphur S
hafnium Hf tantalum Ta
helium He technetium Tc
holmium Ho tellurium Te
hydrogen H terbium Tb
indium In thallium Tl
iodine I thorium Th
iridium Ir thulium Tm
iron Fe tin Sn
krypton Kr titanium Ti
lanthanum La tungsten W
lawrencium Lr uranium U
lead Pb vanadium V
lithium Li xenon Xe
lutetium Lu ytterbium Yb
magnesium Mg yttrium Y
manganese Mn zinc Zn
mendlevium Md zirconium Zr
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 453
8 ANNEXES
8.1 Metals and compounds in relevant legislation and agreements
Metal and compoundsX
YEuropean directive,
regulation, or
International treaty
Cadmium Copper Chromium Lead Nickel Zinc
Commission decision on the
implementation of a European
pollutant emission register
(EPER) for IPPCD
[2, EC, 2000]
Threshold air kg/yr: 10
Threshold water kg/yr: 5
100
50
100
50
200
20
50
20
200
100
Council Directive 67/548/EEC
as amended:
Classification, packing and
labelling [105, EC, 1967]
The proposed human health classification is:
Carcinogen category 2, R49 (may cause cancer by
inhalation); R48/23/25 (toxic: danger of serious
damage to health by prolonged exposure through
inhalation and if swallowed);
Mutagen category 3, R68 (possible risk of
irreversible effects); Reprotoxic category 3, R63
(possible risk of harm to the unborn child); and
possibly R37 (irritating to the respiratory system).
It is proposed to class it as dangerous for the
environment: very toxic to aquatic organisms and
may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic
environment (R50/53).
No
Current/proposed
classification:
CrO
3
: toxic/very toxic
(Carcinogen category 1)
Na
2
Cr
2
O
7,
Chromium (VI)
compounds (with
exceptions): Carcinogen
category 2
Lead compounds
except where
specified elsewhere:
Reprotoxic
category 1
Nickel oxides and
sulphides:
Carcinogen
category 1
Zinc
chromates
(Cr(VI) is the
controlled
substance):
Carcinogen
category 1
Commission regulation (EC)
no 143/97 of 27 January 1997
concerning the third list of
priority substances as foreseen
under Council Regulations
(EEC) No 793/93
(Review of risk and risk
reduction strategies)
Cadmium, cadmium oxide No
Chromium trioxide
Potassium dichromate
Sodium chromate
Sodium dichromate
Ammonium dichromate
No
Nickel
Nickel sulphate
No
Council Directive 96/82/EC on
the control of major accident
hazards involving dangerous
substances (Seveso II
Directive)
Toxic: triggers Seveso II at 100 tonnes
Very toxic: triggers
Seveso II at five tonnes
Annexes
454 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Metal and compoundsX
YEuropean directive,
regulation, or
international treaty
Cadmium Copper Chromium Lead Nickel Zinc
Council Directive
76/769/EEC as amended:
Restrictions on marketing and
use [144, EC, 1976]
Yes: May only be used in aeronautical,
aerospace, mining, offshore and nuclear sectors.
Also in some safety devices for transport, and
electrical contacts in any sector.
No
As hexavalent
chromium
Yes, but not
applicable to STM
uses
Nickel metal and
compounds: Not
to be used in
jewellery or
garment
fasteners, with
some exceptions
Not
applicable to
STMuses
Council Directive
86/278/EEC: sewage sludge
used in agriculture
[95, EC, 1986]
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes (X) No No Yes (X ***) Yes No
X = priority hazardous substance, aimed for cessation or phasing out of discharges, emissions, and losses within 20 years.
Decision 2455/2001/EC:
Establishing a list of priority
substances in the field of
water quality [143, EC, 2001]
*** = subject to a review for possible identification as a priority hazardous substance.
Directive 2002/95/EC:
Restriction of use in electrical
and electronic equipment
[2, EC, 2000]
Yes No
As hexavalent
chromium
Yes in solders No No
Directive 2000/53/EC:
End of life vehicles
[99, EC, 2000]
No No
As hexavalent
chromium
Yes (except for
petrol tanks and
PCBs)
No No
OSPAR Convention list of
substances of possible
concern [131, OSPAR, 2002
ongoing]
Yes No No No No No
Table 8.1: Metals and compounds in relevant legislation and agreements
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 455
8.2 PFOS (perfluorooctane sulphonate) in the surface
treatment of metals and plastics

[109, DEFRA, 2004] PFOS related compounds are polymers of high molecular weights in
which PFOS is only a fraction of the polymer and final product. They have surface active
properties and high resistance to oxidation which makes them useful in a number of
applications. This Annex, and the reports it refers to, relates to PFOS and those substances that
break down to PFOS.

In metal finishing they are used in additives to reduce surface tension and to prevent mist
formed by gas evolution at electrodes during plating. They are widely used in hexavalent
chromium plating to reduce the workplace air concentration of hexavalent chromium. They are
also used in a similar way in anodising and acid pickling.

Other known surface finishing uses are:

in copper plating, preventing haze by regulating foam and improving bath stability
while improving brightness and adhesion
in nickel plating, as non-foaming surfactants, reducing the surface tension and
increasing strength of the electroplate by eliminating pinholes, cracks and peeling
in tin plating producing a uniform coating thickness
to impart a positive charge to fluoropolymer particles and to aid electroplating of
polymers (e.g. PTFE) onto steel.

Overall usage in the EU-15 in metal finishing is estimated to be three to nine tonnes per year.

The major worldwide producer of PFOS (3M, US) took voluntary action in 2000 to withdraw
most uses of the substance from the market.

The US and UK jointly agreed, in conjunction with the OECD Task Force on Existing
Chemicals, to work together on a hazard assessment: the US worked on human health and the
UK on environment. This hazard assessment was completed and subsequently endorsed by the
OECD TF (late in 2002). The conclusions were that PFOS is persistent, bio-accumulative and
toxic, and this is a cause of concern for the environment and humans.

Given these inherent properties and evidence of exposure, a risk reduction strategy (RRS) was
initiated in the UK. Whilst this is a UK activity, it follows European guidance as laid out under
the Existing Substances Regulation Technical Guidance Document. In this way, it is the UKs
intention to make it useful to other Member States and indeed any other country that may wish
to use the results.

Whilst the RRS is explicitly a UK activity only, the EU and a number of EU Member States
have expressed an interest in this work.

The strategy will be finalised and published by the UK in March 2004.

Annexes
456 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
8.3 Examples of regulatory emission limit values
Table 8.2: Emission limit values for surface treatment waste water in Europe (values in mg/l) (CETS)
PARCOM Belgium France
1
Germany England & Wales
2
Italy
3
Netherlands Spain Portugal
Discharge to public sewer
(PS) or surface water (SW)
PS or SW SW
Indicative BAT
values to PS
SW
Ag 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Al 10.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0
Cd 0.2
4
0.6 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2
CN free 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.1
Cr(VI) 0.1
5
0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1
Cr total 0.5
5
5.0 3.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 0.5
Cr(III)
2.0 4.0
Cr(III) 3.0
Cu 0.5
5
4.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 10.0 2.0
F 10.0 15.0 50 6 6.0 12.0 15.0
Fe 20.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 5.0
Hg 0.05
4
0.1 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05
Ni 0.5
5
3.0 5.0 0.5 -1 1.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 10 5.0
NO
2
1.0 0.6 1.0
P 2.0 10 2 10 15 10 20 10
Pb 0.5
5
1.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.0
Sn 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10 2.0 10.0 2.0
Zn 0.5
5
7.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 3.0 20 5.0
COD 300 150 400 160 150
EDT 0 0
HC Total 5.0 0.1 0.1 5 0.1 20 40
VOX 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.1
Settleable solids 50 60
Total load of salts
No limits regionally
partly for sulphates
No limits No limits
Total load of heavy metals (see note 5) 15 No limits 50kg/y/factory, 20kg/y/metal 3
Sum of all metals
15 20 mg/l
HC: Hydrocarbons
1. France: water consumption: 8 litres per square metre of treated surface for each rinsing stage.
2.Environment Agency for England and Wales: these are indicative BAT standards from guidance for permit writing expected to be reached by the application of BAT
3. Lower limits are provided by law for some areas (i.e. catchment basin of the Lagoon of Venice) [112, Assogalvanica, 2003]
4. PARCOM: for waste water streams treated specifically[12, PARCOM, 1992]
5. PARCOM plants discharging small loads of metals (defined as: sum of total chromium, copper, lead, nickel and zinc less than 200 g/day prior to end-of-pipe treatment on demonstration by the applicant) may be subject to
limit values up to a maximum four times higher for total chromium, copper, lead and nickel. This is to be granted by the competent authority.
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 457
In Finland there are no national emission limit values for discharges from surface treatment
plants. Usually waste waters from surface treatment plants are discharged to the public sewer
and each water works sets its own limit values for industrial waste waters. However, emission
limit values used by the Helsinki Water Company are also widely applied in other water service
plants. In addition, there is the Helcom Recommendation (23/7) for reduction of discharges and
emissions from metal surface treatment, which is used in writing environmental permits.
Besides the concentration (mg/l) limit, load (kg/d) is also usually defined. Load is determined
on a case by case basis. Table 8.3 presents emission limit values which are used at the Helsinki
Water Company and values given in the Helcom recommendation:

Substance
Example of emission limit values to Helsinki
waste water treatment works
Helcom
Recommendation
guidelines (23/7)
Cadmium 0.01 mg/l 0.20 mg/l
Mercury 0.01 mg/l 0.05 mg/l
Chromium (Cr-total) 1.0 mg/l 0.7 mg/l
Chromium (VI) 0.1 mg/l 0.2 mg/l
Copper 2.0 mg/l 0.5 mg/l
Lead 0.5 mg/l 0.5 mg/l
Nickel 0.5 mg/l 1.0 mg/l
Silver 0.2 mg/l 0.2 mg/l
Zinc 3.0 mg/l 2.0 mg/l
Tin 2.0 mg/l
Unbound cyanide 0.2 mg/l
Cyanide (total) 0.5 mg/l
Volatile organic halogens
(VOX)
0.1 mg/l
Sulphate, thiosulphate,
sulphite (total)
400 mg/l
Table 8.3: Helsinki Water Co. and Helcom emission limit values for industrial waste waters

Substance Classification
Dangerous material
reference number
(Germany)
Maximum job
concentration
TA Luft
Nitrogen oxides (NO
X
)
fire supporting
corroding
TRGS 900 5 mg/m
3
350 mg/m
3
Hydrogen fluorine (HF)
very toxic
corroding
TRGS 900 2.5 mg/m
3
3 mg/m
3
Hydrogen chloride
(HCl)
corroding TRGS 900 8 mg/m
3
30 mg/m
3
Sulphuric acid (SO
x
) corroding TRGS 900 1 mg/m
3
350 mg/m
3
Aerosols with NaOH corroding TRGS 900 2 mg/m
3
n/a
Chromium (VI)
compounds
toxic
environmentally
dangerous
TRGS 900 0.1 mg/m
3
0.05 mg/m
3
Table 8.4: Air pollutants in surface technology
[104, UBA, 2003]

Noise
French regulations impose emission values for noise, depending on the local environment; an
sound level between 3 and 6 dB(A) above the background level is prescribed outside the plant
[121, France, 2003].
Annexes
458 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
PCB (printed circuit board) pollutant concentration in effluents
Table 8.5 shows the most common concentrations of pollutants in effluents of a typical PCB
production which discharges into a public sewer.

Parameter
German limit values in mg/l
(taken according to regulations or as two hour composite)
AOX 1
Arsenic 0.1
Lead 0.5
Chromium 0.5
Chromium VI 0.1
Cyanide 0.2
Copper 0.5
Nickel 0.5
Silver 0.1
Sulphide 1
Tin 2
Table 8.5: Typical limit values for discharge of waste waters from PCB manufacture to public sewer

When discharging into watercourses, in addition to the values mentioned above the following
values are required:

Parameter German limit values in mg/l
(taken according to regulations
or as two hour composite)
Nitrogen of ammonium
compounds
50
Chemical oxygen demand 600
Iron 3
Fluoride 50
Hydrocarbons 10
Phosphorus 2
Fish toxicity (T
F
) 6
Table 8.6:Typical values addition parameters for discharge from PCB manufacture to watercourse

8.3.1 Regulations applicable to surface treatment activities in France

The pollution and nuisances caused by surface treatment mostly result from the use and
handling of toxic products, which also necessitate the adoption of strict safety and hygiene
measures in workshops.

The main pollutants are identified in Section 1.4.

For these reasons, surface treatments are directly or indirectly subject to various regulations,
notably those resulting from the law on installations classified for protection of the
environment, but also from the water law and the law on chemical products. In some cases,
town planning regulations may also prevent the installation of a surface treatment workshop.

The main national regulations presented below directly or indirectly concern surface treatments.
These regulations, which are liable to change, are those in force on the date of construction of
the installation. They are also without prejudice to any specific regulations which might apply
locally. For these reasons, for any project involving the creation, modification or even the
shutting-down of a workshop, it is recommended to contact the classified installations
inspection body (regional department of industry, research and environment), which is
responsible for specifying the regulations which actually apply to the case in question.
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 459
Town planning constraints
The construction of a classified installation usually requires a building permit, which must be
applied for at the same time as the authorisation under the classified installations legislation or
the submission of the declaration.

Classified installations legislation
The prevention of pollution due to industrial installations is covered by a specific legislative
framework, i.e. the legislation on installations classified for protection of the environment
(environment code art. L.511-1 and following former law of 19 July 1976).

Authorisation and declaration systems
Surface treatment activities subject to the authorisations system must meet the
requirements of prefectural orders drawn up in particular on the basis of the minimum
requirements defined nationally by the ministerial order of 26 September 1985.

Order of 26 September 1985
Issued in application of article 7 of the law of 19 July 1976 (L.512-5 of the environment
code), the ministerial order of 26 September 1985 (Official Journal of 16 November
1985) establishes the regulation framework applicable to surface treatment workshops
subject to authorisation. It is the result of reflection on regulations initiated in 1972
(circular of 4 July 1972, followed by the circular of 22 March 1983
Standard order 2565
The order of 30 June 1997 establishes the regulation framework for surface treatment
workshops covered by Section 2565, which are subject to declaration.

Water law
The legislation on water (environment code - Art. L.210-1 and following) is intended to ensure
balanced management of water resources.

Health legislation
The disposal of non-domestic waste water in a public sewerage network is a fairly common
practice, particularly in food industries. In practice, this solution is also quite often used by
small businesses or small industrial structures, including surface treatment workshops.

Waste
The surface treatment industry produces considerable quantities of metallic hydroxide sludges,
which constitute special industrial wastes (SIW) as defined by decree no. 97-517 of 15 May
1997 relating to the classification of dangerous wastes. Some 175000 tonnes per year of
hydroxide sludge is produced by France, and approximately 1000000 tonnes per year by the
European Union [source: Cetim].

Soil pollution
Surface treatment workshops are frequently the cause of serious pollution of soils and
groundwaters. Sites whose soil has been polluted by industrial activities are managed within the
framework of regulations relating to classified installations
Polluting substances
The order of 26 September 1985 regulates a clearly defined activity, namely the surface
treatment activity (sector approach).

Annexes
460 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Solvents
Solvents harmful for the aquatic environment
The orders of 2 October 1991 regulate the disposal in water of trichloroethene
(trichlorethylene), tetrachloroethene (perchlorethylene), and 1.2-dichloroethane
(methylene chloride), including in their uses as surface degreasing products, in
application of Directive 76/464/CEE.

Volatile organic compounds
European Council Directive 99/13/EC of 11 March 1999 aims to reduce emissions due
to the use of solvents in industry by 57 % between now and 2007. Surface treatment
workshops may enter into the field of this Directive for metal cleaning and degreasing
operations and the application of certain paints and varnishes. The transposition of this
Directive into French law for these activities subject to authorisation is carried out by
amendment of the order of 2 February 1998 (order of 29 May 2000 and order to be
issued).

Environmental management
In addition to the regulations aspect, the importance of voluntary actions aimed at a constant
improvement of a companys results in environmental terms is underlined. There are numerous
reasons (image, responsibility, long-term strategy) for the head of a company to commit himself
to an environmental management policy.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 461
8.4 Monitoring

The reference document on the general principles of monitoring [91, EIPPCB, ] provides wide-
ranging guidance on all aspects of monitoring. Details on calculating water consumption are
given in Section 3.2.2 of this document. Some issues specific to the sector are given in the
sections below.

8.4.1 General issues for monitoring in the surface treatment of metals
and plastics

8.4.1.1 Organic carbon

In some cases, besides chemical oxygen demand (COD) also total organic carbon (TOC) could
be determined from waste waters. TOC describes the amount of organic compounds in waste
water, which can either be biologically degradable or not. COD method oxidises almost all
types of organic compounds and most inorganic reducing agents. High chloride concentration
(1000 mg/l) in waste water can disturb COD determination. EN 1484 is the Eurpean standard
method for total organic carbon (TOC) and the ISO standard for COD is ISO 15705: 2002.

8.4.1.2 Air monitoring

In Section 3.3.3, the data from CETS UK are from samples taken according to the following
procedures:

Stack velocity, temperature measurements and total particulate matter (including chromium)
were made according to BS EN 13284:2002 and BS ISO 9096:2003. Particulate samples were
taken with a Stackmite 9096 sampling train. Chromium determinations were by atomic
absorption spectroscopy. Periodic sampling for halides (chlorides) was by using a calibrated
pump connected to an impinger sampling train containing solutions of 0.1N sulphuric acid and
0.1N sodium hydroxide, based on USEPA 26. Analysis was by ion chromatography. The
sampling and laboratory work was carried out by a contractor accredited under ISO 9002, and
the contractor is accredited for most of the laboratory methods (except chloride) under UKAS.

8.4.2 Self monitoring of aqueous effluents from the surface treatment of
metals and plastics

Introduction
[56, France, 2003] The application of self-monitoring is based on regular analyses of the
effluents with two aims:

compliance with the concentration of the various species and their flows, whose limits
are defined by a public authority (regulator)
taking corrective actions where necessary.

Determination of a polluting load requires:

measurement of the continuous flow
sampling
analyses.

Measurement of a continuous flow
The measurements of continuous flows are important, particularly their precision and their
reliability. Sound knowledge of the water flows enables the use of sampling equipment, to
calculate pollutant loads and to determine the correct dimensions for waste water treatment
equipment.
Annexes
462 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Whatever the type of apparatus used, measurement must include a recording of the flows and a
sum of the volumes. All the measurement equipment must be calibrated and regulated by an
organisation or a skilled person once every year at least.

There are two methods of measurement:

open channel
closed control, pipework or circuit.

Flow measurement in open channel is a question of obtaining a relation between the flow and
the water level in the measurement equipment (Venturi channels, sluices or spillways, gauges)
which produce a standing head of water for measurement. The flow is calculated with water
level measure or pressure measure. The most used sensors are:

bubble meters, which have good measurement precision but are sensitive and require
careful maintenance
ultrasound (ultrasonic) sensors not in contact with the effluents, but not usable with
foam and moisture condensation on the ultrasonic head can cause interference
depth gauge floats.

Flow measurement in closed control:

electromagnetic measuring apparatus
ultrasonic measuring apparatus
vortex effect measuring apparatus.

The accuracy of these can be affected by particulates and entrained air bubbles or foam in the
pipework.

Sampling
The equipment must allow a representative sampling of the effluents. The place of the intake
point has to be chosen so that:

the effluents speed is not modified by constrictions or obstacles
the effluent must be homogeneous
the intake point must be located at a sufficient distance from the last connection of a
line for adequate mixing.

If necessary, a mixing station can be used without modifying the quality of released water.

Sampling should be proportional to the flow of effluent except in the case of a constant flow
after a buffer tank, for example:

types of sampling systems: by suction and by pumping
they must allow a sufficient intake speed (superior or equal to 0.5 m/s)
they must be equipped with suction and repression pipes with a minimum internal
diameter of 9 mm
they must be equipped with a system of sequential purging of the suction pipe
they must be equipped with a thermally insulated or refrigerated enclosure at 4 C when
necessary (such as for COD, BOD analysis) for a good conservation of the samples.

Other samples should be taken as needed to ensure the effluent complies with the permitted
conditions, such as maximum concentration or value (such as for pH).

Samples should not be filtered before analysis [12, PARCOM, 1992].

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 463
Validation
The operator should have a duplicate analysis made on the same sample by an approved
laboratory at least once a year.

The exterior process of validation is based on:

the checking of the lines of flows and the sampling (a control once a year at least)
analytical control of the lines (one to four times per year according to the installation
size)
constitution of two series of samples starting from the same batch and sending of a
batch to an approved laboratory (same conservation conditions, simultaneous start of
the analyses).

Analyses of samples
Reference methods are:

1. Molecular absorption spectrophotometry or colorimetry
The element or species to be estimated is combined with a reagent to form or destroy a coloured
complex. This complex is soluble in water or in an organic phase. A light beam is passed
through the solution to be analysed. A fraction of the incidental light is retained or absorbed by
the solution proportionally to the concentration of the absorbing substance. The proportion of
absorptive light at a specific wavelength is determined using an optical device (monochromator)
associated to an electronic measurement.

Advantages
o very simple technique
o some equipment is portable
o method usually sensitive enough to reach the discharge limits imposed.

Disadvantages
o prone to interferences because not always specific of the species to be
determined (the guide elements can react with the reagent or the entity to be
proportioned or the elements to be proportioned can be in presence of coloured
elements)
o may not be sensitive enough for some limit values (e.g. cadmium).

2. Atomic absorption spectroscopy
The element to be analysed is at high temperature resulting in a break of the molecular bonds
and creating free atoms. These atoms have the property to absorb visible or ultraviolet luminous
radiations at wavelengths which are specific to each other.
Absorption is proportional to the quantity of atoms crossed by radiation thus giving access to
the concentration of the element.

The source of ionisation is made up with a flame in which the solution is nebulised or an
electrothermic system (furnace) in which the solution is injected.

Advantages:
o good method usable for estimating all metal cations, more selective, more
sensitive and faster than the others, more expensive too but economic within a
reasonable time when a large number of analyses are required.

Disadvantages
o this method can only be used in a laboratory.
3. Inductive coupling plasma emission spectrometry
A gas is ionised (argon) in a torch (tube with quartz) surrounded by an inductor connected to a
high frequencies generator functioning at constant frequency.
Annexes
464 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
An aerosol of the sample to be analysed is injected into this plasma with a pneumatic
nebulisator. The atom radiation is decomposed in spectral lines by a diffraction pattern.

The light intensity of these lines is converted into concentration of the required chemical
elements.

Advantages:
o achieves a very low detection limit, simultaneous proportioning of trace
elements and strongly concentrated elements, suppression of interferences,
proportioning of Cr.

Disadvantages:
o very expensive equipment
o this method can only be used in a laboratory.

4. Ion chromatography
This method consists of liquid chromatography with separation on an ion exchange resin
followed by various types of detection (conductimetry, amperometry, UV spectrophotometry,
fluorescence). A liquid sample is injected into an analytical column in a flow of eluant allowing
the migration of the ionic species which is a specific function of their individual affinity
function of their with the resin. The column separates the different ions according to their
retention times. The time of the observed peaks is compared with those of a standard mixture
(the height or the surface of the peaks allows a quantitative measurement. The integrator makes
an automatic measurement.

Advantages:
o study of the metal and alkaline earth cations using the detector
o study of cyanide, sulphide, iodide, and bromide with the amperometric detector.

Disadvantage:
o this method can only be used in a laboratory.
5. Basic (or spot) techniques
All of these are based on the colorimetry, except pH meters. Many devices can be found on the
market. They can be classified in four groups:

Test strips
These are plastic strips with a pad of absorbent paper at one end which contains a reagent.
When placed in a test solution, the pad changes colour, and the density is proportional to the
concentration of the species to be measured. Their sensitivity and accuracy are poor, so they
are only used to control process efficiency or in case of accidental pollution.

Similar strips can also be used to test for pH, either in broad or narrow ranges.

Comparators
A system with two beams is used. One of them passes through the sample with reagents
added, and the other one is directed to a coloured scale. The coloured scale is adjusted to
equal the colour of the test sample, and this gives the concentration of the element being
measured.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 465
Photometers
These are an optical system isolating different wavelengths provided with interference
filters. The source is polychromatic and the incidental light includes either the whole visible
spectrum or a part of a band between two wavelengths. The light signal is converted into
electrical current which is treated and displayed either on a galvanometer with a needle or a
digital apparatus. Then the concentration can be directly read.

pH meters
These can be either portable or laboratory based.

Conclusion:
The range of analytical equipment is suitable technically for the objectives of self-monitoring.

The difficulty is in the complexity of the effluents and in the need for samples that are
proportional, i.e. correspond accurately to the effluent discharged.

The results are compatible, except for cyanides (which may require stabilising before
transporting to verifying laboratories or if much time elapses prior to analysis).

The collection and preparation of proportional samples (including stabilisation), the complexity
of the effluents, and the type and complexity of analyses requires suitably qualified and trained
staff.

References:
[56, France, 2003] Reference document on the General Principles of Sampling [91, EIPPCB, ]

Annexes
466 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
8.5 Reference plants in Germany
Note: No data was given for Plants B or I.

8.5.1 Reference plant A

Age of the plant
20 years.

Number of employees in surface treatment
22 co-workers (18 in production, 4 in administration).

Type of plant
In-house shop.

Production units of the complete business

foundry for plastics and zinc (pressure pouring)
mechanical treatments (pressing and machining)
paint shop
plating
assembly.

Production processes in this plating unit
Barrel plant for small articles with the following process steps:

hot degreasing
electrolytical degreasing
cyanide copper plating
black nickel plating
half gloss-nickel plating
chemical nickel plating.

The base materials of the treated workpieces are approximately:

60 % die-cast zinc
30 % steel
10 % brass and copper.

Throughput

54000 m
2
/yr of small articles, involving:
o 5000 operation hours per year
o 5000 to 10000 barrels/yr
o workpieces 100000 kg/yr.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 467
3 54 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 12
27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15
L
o
a
d
i
n
g
I
n
t
e
r
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
h
o
l
d
i
n
g
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
/
u
n
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
D
r
i
e
r
D
r
i
e
r
H
o
t
r
i
n
s
e
H
o
t
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
H
o
t
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
S
t
a
t
i
c
F
l
o
w
F
l
o
w
r
i
n
s
e
C
y
a
n
i
d
e
c
o
p
p
e
r
p
l
a
t
i
n
g S
t
a
t
i
c
F
l
o
w
F
l
o
w
S
t
a
t
i
c
S
t
a
t
i
c
r
i
n
s
e
N
i
c
k
e
l
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
p
l
a
t
i
n
g
C
h
e
m
i
c
a
l
n
i
c
k
e
l
p
l
a
t
i
n
g
Rinses
Rinses
S
t
a
t
i
c
F
l
o
w
Rinses
B
l
a
c
k
n
i
c
k
e
l
P
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
Figure 8.1: Plant A process flow diagram

Annexes
468 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Chemicals used,
including trade names
Process step
Quantity or volume of
bath in litres
Concentration
Annual
consumption
Rivolta BRX Hot degrease 300 50 g/l 220 kg
Bonder V358 Hot degrease 320 100 g/l 325 kg
Entfetter 2032
Electrical
degrease
320 150 g/l 450 kg
Sodium cyanide
Copper cyanide
Additive part 3
Additive part 4
Additive part 5
Copper anodes
Cyanide copper 320
25 g/l
55 g/l (Cu+)
13.4 ml/l
6.8 ml/l
n/d
n/a
400 kg
300 kg
90 kg
30 kg
30 kg
900 kg
Start solution
Lead salt
Additive BP
Additive 67
Wetting agents
Black nickel 250
140 ml/l
60 g/l
10 ml/l
5 ml/l
n/d
600 kg
100 kg
400 kg
40 kg
n/d
Nickel sulphate
Nickel chloride
Boric acid
Wetting agent
Brightener additive
Nickel anodes
Semi-bright
nickel
320
65 g/l (Ni
2+
)
25 g/l (Cl
-
)
40 g/l
5 ml/l
20 ml/l
n/a
900 kg
400 kg
300 kg
90 kg
150 kg
500 kg
Solution C-A1
Solution C-A2
Solution C-A3
Regenerate C-A5
Solution C-A6
Regenerate C-A8
Nitric acid
Chemical nickel
station 27
320
67.2 ml/l
67.2 ml/l
0.75 ml/l
18.56 l/MTO
n/d
pH maintenance
300 kg
150 kg
15 kg
300 kg
180 kg
230 kg
1260kg
Chemicals Process step Quantity/volume Operational
concentration
Annual
consumption
NaOH
NaOCl
HCl
Amidosulphonic acid
Flocculating agents
Lime, solid
Effluent treatment
prior to discharge
to municipal
waste water
system

20980 kg
38000 kg*
2082 kg
700 kg
540 kg
175 kg
* NaOCl consumption from 1 June 99 was only 9770 kg, since nitrite treatment was changed over to amidosulphonic
acid
n/d = non determined
n/a = non applicable
Table 8.7: Plant A input materials

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 469
Process step Material Refill amounts Refill cycle
Analytic
control cycle
Hot degrease Rivolta BRX 4.4 kg/w Weekly (w) Weekly
Hot degrease Bonder V358 6.3 kg/w Weekly (w) Weekly
Electrical
degrease
Entfetter 2032 9 kg/w Weekly (w) Weekly
Cyanide copper
Sodium cyanide copper
Cyanide
Additive part 3
Additive part 4
Additive part 5
Copper anodes
1.6 kg/d
1.2 kg/d
360 g/d
120 g/d
120 g/d
3.6 kg/d
Daily (d) Daily
Black nickel
Start solution
Lead salt
Additive BP
Additive 67
Wetting agents
2.4 kg/d
400 g/d
1.2 kg/d
160 g n.b.*
Daily (d)
n.b. * added
routinely
without
analysis
Daily
Semi-bright
nickel
Nickel sulphate nickel
Chloride
Boric acid
Wetting agent
Gloss additive
Nickel anodes
18 kg/w
8 kg/w
6 kg/w
1.8 kg/w
3 kg/w
10 kg/w
Weekly (w) Weekly
Chemical nickel
Solution C-A1
Solution C-A2
Solution C-A3
Regenerate C-A5
Solution C-A6
Regenerate C-A8
Nitric acid
1.2 kg/d
600 g/d
60 g/d
1.2 kg/d
720 g/d
920 g/d
5 kg/d
Daily (d) Daily
Table 8.8: Plant A service lifetime of the feeds, cycles of monitoring and refill of chemicals

Substitution for problem materials used
Cyanide-free systems for the copper plating of die-cast zinc materials are not available.

Attempts to substitute the oxidation of cyanide in effluents by sodium hypochlorite (to avoid the
AOX problem) by UV-radiation supported oxidation failed. In order to keep the quantity of
NaOCl used low, the nitrite treatment was changed over to reduction with amidosulphonic acid,
which resulted in a saving of approximately 50 % of the sodium hypochlorite solution quantity
previously used.

Designation Input materials
Concentration
(g/l)
Temperature
(C)
Service life
Hot degrease Rivolta BRX 50 60 1 month
Hot degrease Bonder V358 M 100 60 1 month
Electrolytic
degrease
Entfetter 2032 150 60 3 months
Cyanide
NaCN
Cu
25
55
50
Rarely
changed
Black nickel Beginning solution lead salt 760 60
Rarely
changed
Semi-bright nickel
Ni
2
+
Cl
-
H
3
BO
3
65
25
40
60
Rarely
changed
Chemical nickel
Ni
2
+
reducing agent
4.7
24.4
90 2 months
Table 8.9: Plant A service life of the process baths

Annexes
470 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
The service life of nickel and copper electrolytes - with the exception of chemical nickel
solutions - are practically infinite, because the drag-out is sufficiently high that the impurities do
not achieve a harmful concentration. Special bath care measures are not necessary. Impurities
are removed from the black nickel and electrolytic solutions by filtering in a bypass system. For
the remaining feeds, no special care measures are used; the service lifetimes obtained are
regarded as sufficient.

Measures for the reduction of drag-out
The barrels for this line are specifically designed to achieve better draining of the liquid in the
drum. After lifting out from the bath, the barrel is turned, in order to make better draining off
possible. The general dripping off times are fixed to five seconds, with the exception of the
copper and nickel plating tanks, where the time is 15 seconds.

The plant runs a wide variety of programmes. As a consequence, the dripping-off time for
pretreatments and rinses is limited to five seconds.

Feedback of dragged-out electrolytes
The feedback of dragged-out electrolytes takes place in different ways:

evaporation losses of the electrolytes are made-up by topping-up from the static rinses
pre-dipping (eco rinse) in the static rinse after the copper, black and semi-bright nickel
returns drag-out to the bath. Chemical nickel electrolyte cannot be fed back
meaningfully, since the simultaneous build-up of impurities would reduce the service
lifetime of the solution drastically.

Evaporation systems for the rinse-water for the feedback of out-dragged electrolytes are not
used in this company.

Rinsing technology
Generally, the rinsing system used is static rinse/flow rinse, but with only a two-stage rinsing
technology, where the flow rinse is led across ion exchangers in cycle. Since the workpiece
throughput is only one to two drums per hour and drag-out is only small, a very small amount of
waste water results. The static rinses are renewed only weekly, and their accumulated waste
water amounts to approximately 1.1 m
3
/week; a small amount of waste water from the eluate of
the ion exchangers is added to this.

The ion exchanger plant for rinse-water of the flow rinses is operated as a central plant for all
the surface treatment units of the enterprise. At present, 17 rinses are discharged in a cycle; five
of them from the described copper/nickel unit. The ion exchanger plant has an output of 20 m
3
/h
and consists of exchanger columns each containing 500 litre resin. Every seven working days
the cation and of an anion exchangers are regenerated. This gives an effluent of 8 m
3
/week.

The static rinse after copper plating is led in a bypass across an electrolysis cell at 150 l/h, in
order to recover the copper present. The service life of the rinse is increased to approximately
six months, at the same time 120 kg/yr of copper are recovered electrolytically. The energy
consumption for the electrolysis cell amounts to about 950 kWh yearly.

Waste water treatment
There is a central waste water treatment plant for all the production areas, so the copper/nickel
plant represents only a small part of the total spectrum of waste water treated.

The nickel/ferrous-cyanide containing acid or alkaline waste waters are caught and treated
separately.

The waste water treatment plant consists of two static treatment tanks of 10 m
3
each. The usual
treatment exists for the separate treatment of cyanide and Cr(VI).
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 471
Streams containing cyanide and nitrite are mixed afterwards with the remaining concentrates for
neutralisation and heavy metal precipitation. For post treatment, the treated water is led over
gravel filters and selective ion exchangers before discharge to the municipal waste water
system.

The waste water streams are:

10 m
3
/week streams containing cyanide
1.5 m
3
/week streams containing nickel/ferrous
20 m
3
/week acid/alkaline streams
5.7 m
3
/week eluate ion exchange eluate on average.

Emission levels of heavy metals in waste water

Parameter Limit values
Internal
control
measurements
External
analysis
External
analysis
Copper 0.5 mg/l 0.13 mg/l 0.63 mg/l 0.18 mg/l
Nickel 1.0 mg/l 0.13 mg/l 0.20 mg/l 0.34 mg/l
Zinc 2.0 mg/l 0.24 mg/l 0.15 mg/l 0.05 mg/l
Table 8.10: Plant A emission levels for heavy metals

With an average of 35 40 m
3
waste water per week, and average values of 0.25 mg/l Cu,
0.25 mg/l Ni and 0.15 mg/l Zn, there is an annual heavy metal load of 440 to 500 g copper, 440
to 500 g nickel and 260 to 300 g zinc.

Waste amount
Waste is mainly seven tonnes of electroplating sludge produced yearly from the waste water
treatment. Some alkaline concentrates are also externally treated. There are also small quantities
of absorption and filter materials.

Type of waste
European Waste
Catalogue Na
Yearly
quantity
Disposal or
recycling
Costs including
transport
Sludges containing
dangerous substances
11 01 09 7.02 t
Pyrometallurgical
nickel recycling
EUR 225 per tonne
Caustic solutions 11 01 07 2.0 t
Chemico-physical
treatment
EUR 450 per tonne
Absorption and filter
materials with
dangerous impurities
15 02 02 0.15 t
Chemico-physical
treatment
EUR 420 per tonne
Table 8.11: Plant A waste quantities

Annexes
472 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The electroplating sludge from the waste water treatment is used completely as a secondary raw
material in a pyrometallurgical recycling plant. Composition is shown in Table 8.12.

Electroplating sludge
Cations Content Anions Content
Calcium 55.1 g/kg Sulphur 10.7 g/kg
Iron 37.3 g/kg Chloride 9.1 g/kg
Nickel 49.5 g/kg
Copper 26.9 g/kg
Zinc 38.1 g/kg
Titanium 1.0 g/kg
Trace components
Chromium 109.9 mg/kg
Manganese 33.3 mg/kg
Molybdenum 458.1 mg/kg
Barium 79.7 mg/kg
Tungsten 253.9 mg/kg
Lead 319.3 mg/kg
Table 8.12: Plant A metal constituents of electroplating sludge

Cost considerations
The capital outlays amounted to:

EUR 150000 for the barrel plant
EUR 125000 for the waste water treatment plant
EUR 15000 for the electrolytic copper recovery from the static rinse
EUR 4000 for a filter unit for the cleaning of the feed-waters.

Maintenance and maintenance costs amount to:

EUR 5000 yearly for the barrel plant
EUR 2500 yearly for the effluent treatment.

The staff expenditure for the shift operation amounts yearly to EUR 45000.

Economics of the electrolytic copper recovery plant
The total costs of the plant are calculated roughly from the following factors, where the energy
costs are set at EUR 0.08/kWh:

capital costs = 8 % EUR 600/yr
maintenance/maintenance (portion measured) EUR 300/yr
energy expenditure = 950 KW x DEM 0.16/kWh = EUR 76/yr
Sum of the annual costs = EUR 976/yr

These cost savings arise from the saved quantity of water (smaller discharge of the static rinse),
the saved waste production, proceeds of the recycled copper and the reduced use of
neutralisation chemicals. Unit savings are:

fresh water EUR 3/m
3
proceeds for the copper EUR 0.9/kg
50 % NaOH EUR 0.23/kg.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 473
Savings per year

saving for fresh water = 10 m
3
/yr x EUR 3/m
3
= EUR 30/yr
proceeds from copper = 90 kg/yr x EUR 0.9/kg = EUR 78.8/yr
saved precipitation chemicals (NaOH):
133.3 kg: 0.76 kg/l x EUR 23/l = EUR 33.5/yr
saved disposal costs of the sludge:
0.345 t x EUR 275/t = EUR 95/yr

Sum of annual savings = EUR 237/yr

Since the yearly costs exceed annual savings, there is no economic driver for this technique.
This is already known by the operator.

Estimation of inputs and outputs
For Plant A, the following figures can be estimated from the available data:

Input nickel quantity = about 1023 kg/yr, consisting of:

nickel sulphate 900 kg/yr, according to 341.5 kg of Ni/yr
nickel chloride 400 kg/yr, according to 181.2 kg of Ni/yr
nickel anodes 500 kg/yr.

33 %
18 %
49 %
Nickel as nickel sulphate
Nickel as nickel chloride
Nickel as anodes
Figure 8.2: Plant A nickel inputs

Emitted nickel quantities = 347 kg/yr, 34 % of the input material used, consisting of

0.5 kg/yr in waste water
346.5 kg/yr as waste.

0 %
34 %
66 %
Waste water
Waste
Workpieces
Figure 8.3: Plant A nickel outputs

Input copper quantity = 1065 kg/yr, consisting of:

copper cyanide 300 kg/yr, equates to 165 kg of Cu/yr
copper anodes 900 kg/yr.

Annexes
474 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Emitted copper quantities = approximately 189 kg/yr, equates to 18 % of the material used,
consisting of:

0.5 kg/yr in waste water
188.3 kg/yr in wastes.

As all the waste containing metal is recycled in metallurgical plants, the overall losses of metals
are minimised. The only complete losses from the system are those emissions in the waste water
and inefficiencies in the metals smelters which may be 30 %.

8.5.2 Reference plant C

Age of the plant
No data

Type of plant
In-house shop

Number of employees
180
Production units of the business

foundry for plastics (injection moulding) and zinc (pressure pouring)
mechanical treatment
galvanizing
assembly.

Production processes in the plating unit

copper plating
nickel plating
chromium plating.
with all necessary pre- and post- treatment processes

Basic material
Zinc die casting and brass

Throughput
No data available

Volume of the treatment vats

metal stripping 2.2 m
3
pre- degreasing 3.2 m
3
degreasing 4.8 m
3
electrolytic degreasing 7.2 m
3
acid copper plating vat I 5.9 m
3
acid copper plating vat II 14.1 m
3
nickel plating 13 m
3
chromium plating 3.8 m
3
.
The sum of the process baths is larger than 30 m
3
; the plant is therefore subject to approval
under the IPPC Directive

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 475
100 mg CN
-
/l
3 m
3
/
3 w
5 m
3
/
6 w
1.5 m
3
/3 w
3 m
3
/
3 w
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e

c
a
s
c
a
d
e
M
e
t
a
l

s
t
r
i
p
p
i
n
g

(
2

m
3
)
P
r
e
r
i
n
s
e
D
e
g
r
e
a
s
e

(
3

m
3
)
P
r
e
r
i
n
s
e
H
o
t

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e

(
5

m
3
)
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e

(
3

m
3
)
P
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e
C
y
a
n
i
d
e
.


C
o
p
p
e
r

p
l
a
t
i
n
g
(
6

m
3
)
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
(
2

m
3
)
P
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
A
c
i
d

c
o
p
p
e
r

p
l
a
t
i
n
g

(
1
4

m
3
)
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e
N
i
c
k
e
l

p
l
a
t
i
n
g

(
1
3

m
3
)
P
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
C
h
r
o
m
i
u
m

P
l
a
t
i
n
g

(
4

m
3
)
3
-
s
t
e
p

r
i
n
s
e

Waste water treatment plant: 4176 m
3
/yr
Filter Filter
Filter Filter
Ion exchanger for rinse-
water recycling.
Throughput = 14 m
3
/h
External metal
recovery
Electrolytic cyanide
oxidation and copper
deposition
5-10 g CN
-
/l
Sewer
Landfill
26.6 t/yr
HCl (5180 kg/yr) H
2
SO
4
(4720 kg/yr) HNO
3
(480 kg/yr) NH
4
OH (50 kg/yr)
Filter
Activated
carbon
filter
Filter
Activated
carbon
filter
Activated
carbon
filter
1.5 m
3
/2 w
1.5 m
3
/3 w
2 m
3
/ 6 w
2 m
3
/ 4 m
50 kg Cu/yr
Note: Process tanks dumping is given in m
3
/ number of weeks (e.g. 2m
3
/ 6 w)
Figure 8.4: Plant C process flow diagram
Annexes
476 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Substitution for problem materials used
Methanol was used as a brightener with the acid copper plating bath, but was replaced due to its
toxicity.

Cyanides cannot be replaced when copper plating die-cast zinc parts.

The main part of the cyanide in the waste water is electrolytically oxidised, which minimises the
use of the sodium hypochlorite. However, sodium hypochlorite cannot be replaced totally, and
is still used with the rinse-water containing cyanide.

Measures for the reduction of drag out
Low concentrations of the process solutions are generally used. The draining times are up to 10
seconds, which achieves relatively good draining off and thus smaller losses result.

Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
Pickling, copper and nickel electrolytes are filtered, as are the two prerinses, whose service life
could be increased thereby to the six-fold.

The copper electrolytes are treated with activated charcoal, which achieves an almost unlimited
service.

Rinsing technology
The rinsing technology is generally three step cascade. In addition the rinse-waters are recycled
via ion exchangers.

Feedback of dragged-out electrolytes
There is automated feedback of rinse-water into the process solutions to a pre-determined
working level. This is with all degreasing solutions and the cyanide copper, satin nickel and
chromium electrolytes.

A pre-dip (eco rinse type) is used with the bright nickel electrolyte, achieving about 50 %
recovery.

Plant Data

plant throughput: 25000 racks/yr
40000 to 50000 m
2
treated surface/yr
anode material: nickel (no data)
copper 750 kg/yr
chromic acid: 2400 kg/yr, which is 1248 kg Cr/yr.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 477
Batch treatment
12 m
3
Collecting tank
acid, alkaline
24 m
3
Collecting tank
concentrates
containing cyanide
Automatic rack plant
for
copper nickel
chromium plating
NaOH
HCl 31 %
Ca(OH)
2
(20 %)
FeSO
4
17 t/yr
72 t/yr
Filter-press
Final control
prior to
discharge to
sewer
Sludge to metal
recycling
26.6 t/yr
EUR 165/t
4176 m
3
/yr
29 t/yr
NaOCl
Electrolytical cyanide
oxidation
300 g CN/h
Collecting tank
treated solution
6.2 t/yr
600 kg/yr
FeCl
3
810 kg/yr
700 kg/yr
Na
2
S
NaHSO
3
700 kg/yr
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
i
o
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
i
o
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
G
r
a
v
e
l
f
i
l
t
e
r
Figure 8.5: Plant C waste water treatment plant flow diagram

The electroplating sludge has the following composition

dry residue approximately 50 %
copper 4.3 g/kg
nickel 14.8 g/kg
iron 17.5 g/kg
zinc 2.2 g/kg
calcium 112.5 g/kg
chromium 44.5 g/kg

Annexes
478 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
The concentrations of the heavy metals in the waste water effluent are

copper 0.25 mg/l
nickel 0.2 mg/l
chromium 0.10 mg/l
iron 1.8 mg/l.

Metal balances

a) Copper

input copper quantity (anode material) 750 kg/yr
copper discharge with the waste water treatment sludge 114 kg/yr
copper discharge with the waste water 1.04 kg/yr.

About 15.3 % of the copper is lost from the process (84.7 % usage); 0.14 % of the total is lost
on the waste water.

b) Nickel

input nickel quantity (anode material) 10815 kg/yr
nickel discharge with the waste water treatment sludge 394 kg/yr
nickel discharge in the waste water 0.83 kg/yr.

Of the input nickel quantities (10815 kg), 703.1 kg are emitted yearly mainly as waste. This
corresponds to 96.3 % use. The nickel portion emitted with the waste water amounts to <0.01 %
of the input quantity.

c) Chromium

input chromium quantity (as H2CrO4) 1248 kg/yr
chrome discharge with the waste water treatment sludge 336 kg/yr
chrome discharge with the waste water 0.4 kg/yr.

About 27 % of the input chromium quantity is emitted (again, mainly as waste), with 73 %
used. The waste water route contributes 0.032 %.

Overall
The plating sludge is entirely used as secondary raw material in metallurgical processes. The
loss of input metals from the overall system is <1 % (actually 0.018 %), and this is as emissions
in the waste water. However, this does not take into the account the efficiency of metals
recovery in the smelters, etc. which may be as low as 70 %.

8.5.3 Reference Plant D

Age of the plant
No data

Type of plant
In house shop

Number of employees
No data

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 479
Production programme of the entire enterprise:

mechanical work
plating and
assembly, including packing and dispatch.

Production programme of this plating unit (plant D):

copper plating
nickel plating
chemical nickel plating
chromium plating
silver and gold plating.

Basic material
Steel and brass parts

Throughput
3000 tonnes steel and non-ferrous metals

Volume of the treatment vats

metal stripping 16 m
3
soak degreasing 3.6 m
3
electrolyte degreasing 11.2 m
3
cyanide copper plating 4 m
3
acid copper plating (no data)
nickel plating 15 m
3
chromium plating 4.4 m
3
silver plating 12 m
3
.
Input of material
No data available.

Substitution for problem materials used
Cyanides are partly substituted in degreasing solutions. The substitution for the cyanide copper
plating resulted in severe quality problems and has therefore been withdrawn. As an alternative
to the sodium hypochlorite oxidation of cyanide, caroat and UV-ray-supported electrolytic
oxidation were trialled extensively with no success.

Measures for the reduction of drag-out
The concentration of the chromic acid in the chromium plating unit was lowered to 150 g/l,
from which a substantial decrease of dragged-out electrolyte results.

In-house building of racks and intensive maintenance of the racks led to a significant reduction
of the drag out.

Annexes
480 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
H
2
SO
4
(96 %)
4.4 t/yr
HCl (32 %)
1 t/yr
Detergent
6.5 t/yr
NaCN/KCN
1.8 t/yr
NaOH
0.5 t/yr
NaHSO
3
0.2 t/yr
D
e
g
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
i
c

r
i
n
s
e
S
t
a
t
i
c

a
n
d

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
R
u
n
n
i
n
g

r
i
n
s
e
S
t
a
t
i
c

a
n
d

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
F
l
o
w

r
i
n
s
e
P
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
F
l
o
w

r
i
n
s
e
C
o
p
p
e
r

p
l
a
t
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
i
c

a
n
d

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
S
t
a
t
i
c

r
i
n
s
e
N
i

s
t
r
i
k
e
N
i

p
l
a
t
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
i
c

a
n
d

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
C
l
o
s
e
d

c
i
r
c
u
i
t

r
i
n
s
i
n
g
C
h
r
o
m
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
i
c

r
i
n
s
e
S
t
a
t
i
c

r
i
n
s
e
C
r
(
V
I
)
-
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
F
l
o
w

r
i
n
s
e
H
o
t

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
Waste water treatment plant
Waste water amount 30000 m
3
/yr
Filter Filter
Sewer Landfill
237 t/yr
Copper, nickel and chromium plating unit
Ion exchange for the flow
rinses
Throughput = 80 m
3
/h
Figure 8.6: Plant D process flow diagram
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 481
Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
Copper, nickel and silver electrolytes are filtered; silver electrolytes are treated by an additional
activated carbon treatment.

Rinsing technology
The layout of the rinsing technology is generally three step cascade rinses; an exception is the
rinse after pickling. The three step cascade rinses are realised by either two static rinses or one
static rinse in combination with a spray rinse, followed by a final flow rinse which is
regenerated continuously by ion exchangers.

Feedback of dragged-out electrolytes
A feedback of rinse-water from the first static rinse to the process tanks is done at all nickel
plating units as well as the cyanide copper and the chromium plating units.

Waste water treatment
See Figure 8.7. By employment of a so-called tubular rotorfiltration for the dewatering of the
sludge generated with the neutralisation of the waste water, the addition of flocculation
chemicals (iron salts, lime milk, flocculants) could be reduced drastically.

Batch treatment
40 m
3
Collecting tank acid
100 m
3
Collecting tank cyanide
16 m
3
Rack plating unit
- copper
- nickel
- chromium
- silver
- gold
HCl (32 %)
Three filter
presses
Final control
sewer
Landfill
237 t/yr;
EUR 150/t
69 t/yr
FeSO
4
NaHSO
3
Collecting tank alkaline
75 m
3
Batch treatment
40 m
3
Batch treatment
40 m
3
Sludge tank
100 m
3
Sludge tank
100 m
3
Tubular-
rotorfilter
H
2
SO
4
(96 %)
48 t/yr
41 t/yr
15.5 t/yr
NaOH 50 %
89 t/yr
Ca(OH)
2
73 t/yr
30 000 m
3
/yr
NaOCl
94 t/yr
I
o
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
I
o
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
G
r
a
v
e
l
f
i
l
t
e
r
Figure 8.7: Plant D waste water treatment flow diagram

Annexes
482 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Characteristic data of the plant
Because of the large product variety and the steadily changing number of product types, the
indication of metal on the treated surface is not possible.

The sludge analysis results in the following values (analysis of the original sample):

dry residue approximately 48 %
copper 0.21 g/kg
nickel 1.4 g/kg
zinc 0.09 g/kg
chromium 0.13 g/kg
hydrocarbons 3.7 g/kg.

The concentrations of the heavy metals in the waste water are

copper <0.1 mg/l
nickel <0.1 mg/l
chromium <0.1 mg/l
iron 0.5 mg/l.

Emission loads for heavy metals are given in Table 8.13:

Metal Emission
In waste water In waste
Copper <30 kg/yr 50 kg/yr
Nickel <30 kg/yr 332 kg/yr
Chromium <30 kg/yr 31 kg/yr
Table 8.13: Plant D metals losses to waste water and waste

8.5.4 Reference Plant E

Age of the plant
20 years; last modernisation was more than 7 years ago.

Type of plant
In-house shop.

Production programme of the entire enterprise

zinc plating and chromate finishing of steel parts
copper plating, nickel plating and tinning of steel parts
copper plating, nickel plating and tinning of non-ferrous metal parts
silver plating of non-ferrous metal parts.

Production programme of the plating unit (Plant E)
This is an electroplating unit which consists of the following process steps: hot degreasing,
pickling, electrolytically degreasing, cyanide electroplating, lightening, blue chromating.

Throughput
63000 m/yr in 2400 working hours per year.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 483
Waste water
treatment plant
Process
tank
8 m
Waste water 714 m/yr
(4000 h)
Filter
Workpieces in Workpieces out
2 f.
R
i
n
s
e
2 f.
B
l
u
e

c
h
r
o
m
a
t
e
N
e
u
t
r
a
l
1 m
F-
Sp.
1.1 m
Waste to disposal (65 %H
2
O)
10 t/yr
Oil
removal
(skimmer)
2.5 m
2.5 m/yr
7.5 m/yr
28 m/yr
50 m/yr
H
C
l
-
P
i
c
k
l
e
1 m
Anodic
oxidation
Metal to recycling
(183 kg Zn)
R
i
n
s
e
P
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
4
%
H
C
l
Sp.
HCL
21.4 t/yr
P3-cleaner
129 kg/yr
Pickling
concentrate
1.83 t/yr
HCl
2.8 t/yr
Zn: 4125 t/yr
NaCN: 525 kg/yr
NaOH: 1185 kg/yr
Zn(CN)
2
: 122 kg/yr
Concentrate
1.8 t/yr
3.8 m/yr
50 m/yr
2.5 m 1 m
<100 mg/l CN
Throughput: 63000 m/yr
H
o
t

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
2
.
5

m
3
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c

p
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
1
.
2
5

m

H
o
t

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
2
.
5

m
3
F
l
o
w

r
i
n
s
e
2 f. 2 f. 2 f.
P
r
e
d
i
p
2f = 2 fold 3f = 3 fold
Figure 8.8: Plant E process flow diagram
Annexes
484 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Chemicals used
including brand
names
Process step
Quantity
(litres)
Concentration
used
Annual
consumption
(kg)
Annual
consumption
in EUR
P 3 cleaner Hot degreasing 2500 50 g/l 192 480
Hydrochloric acid,
tensides
Pickle: 2500
250 g/l

25 g/l
21354 3203
Non-acid
Electrical
degreasing
1250 130 g/l 1796 4040
Zinc anodes
zinc cyanide
NaCN
NaOH
Zinc electrolyte 8000
Zn
20 g/l
40 g/l
85 g/l
4036
150
525
1415
5400
600
920
481
Nitric acid Clarification 1000 29 g/l 1000 250
Tridur Zn blue
Blue chromate
finishing
1100 70 ml/l 2370 7110
Sum: 22484
Caustic soda 50 % 120300
36090

Lime
19000

2850

Hydrochloric acid
30 %
40000
7000

Sodium
hypochlorite
19000

5130

Ferrous sulphate
Effluent
treatment system
This plant treats
23.5 % of the
total waste water
-- --
3000 450
Sum total 51520
Proportional
23.5 % of the
total system
12107
Table 8.14: Plant E input materials

Substitution for problem materials used
Due to the current safe design and operation of the plant, no substitution of input materials, e.g.
cyanides, is planned at present.

Material Refill cycle Analytic control cycle Service lifetime
P 3 cleaners 12/year 2/month 52 weeks
Hydrochloric acid 30 % 20/year 1/week 17 weeks
Non-acid 3/day 1/week 17 weeks
Zn NaCN NaOH 1/week 1/week infinitely
Nitric acid 1/day 1/day 1 week
Tridur Zn-blue continuously 1/week 2 weeks
Table 8.15: Plant E service life of the solutions cycle of the monitoring and refill of chemicals

Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
The service life of the zinc electrolyte is practically infinite, as the drag out is sufficiently high
that the impurities do not achieve a concentration that deteriorates plating quality. Special bath
care measures are not then necessary.

An oil separator (skimmer) is used to remove fats, oils and other pollutants from the hot
degreasing solutions.

The chromating solution is not regenerated.

Measures for the reduction of drag out
Spray rinse over hot and electrolytic degrease tanks.
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 485
Feedback of dragged-out electrolytes

partial direct feedback of contents of the static rinse into the process tanks
pre-dip in the static rinse of the zinc plating stage; resulting to a 50 % feedback of
dragged out electrolytes.

Rinsing technology
See flow diagram Figure 8.8.

Waste water treatment
See flow diagram Figure 8.9.

The central waste water treatment plant for Reference plant E
The portion attributable to the described zinc plating unit is 23.5 %
Plating units
ion exchanger
filtration units
Collecting tank
50 m
Collecting tank for
solutions containing
cyanide 30 m
NaOH 50 %
NaOCl
Batch treatment
Total waste water
50 m
Batch
cyanide
treatment
25 m
Settling tank
50 m
Filter
press
Gravel
filter
Selective
ion
exchange
Selective
ion
exchange
Final control
Waste to
disposal (42.6 t/yr)
disposal costs
175 EUR/t (total)
120 t/yr
40 t/yr
3000 m/yr
(total)
Anodic cyanide oxidation and
metal recovery
3000 m/yr
Rinse-water
cyanide
183 kg Zn to recycling
Fe SO
4
HCl
19 t/yr
19 t/yr
Figure 8.9: Plant E waste water treatment plant flow diagram

The waste water of this plating unit is treated together with the waste water from other surface
treating unit of the enterprise. The fraction amounts to 23.5 % of the total waste water of the
whole plant.
Annexes
486 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Special techniques in waste water treatment - Electrolysis cell for the oxidation of cyanide
and the recycling of zinc and copper from rinse-waters
An electrolytic cell is used for the treatment of the rinse-waters containing cyanide coming from
the copper and zinc plating units, in order to oxidise the cyanide-ion (at the anode) and to
separate the metals (at the cathode). This greatly reduces the use of sodium hypochlorite and
therefore the formation of AOX. Anodic oxidation of the solutions containing cyanide achieves
a cyanide concentration of less than 100 mg/l.

At the cathode 331 kg copper and 183 kg of zinc are separated; at the anode 571 kg of cyanide
is oxidised.

The energy consumption for cyanide oxidation and metal reduction is 6753 kWh/yr. The
treatment cost is EUR 0.9/kg cyanide oxidised, assuming a price of EUR 0.075/kWh (the metal
utilisation is not considered here). The average concentrations of the cyanide input stream is 3.7
g/l and 0.018 g/l in the output stream. The emission levels achieved are shown in Table 8.16

Parameter Emission concentrations mg/l
Limit values Internal analysis External analysis
Chromium 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.3
Cyanide 0.2 <0.2 0.1
Zinc 2.0 0.8 1.2 1.1
Table 8.16: Plant E waste water emission values for heavy metals

Loads of heavy metals
With a water usage of 3036 m
3
per year and metal concentrations of 1 mg/l Zn and 0.3 mg/l Cr
respectively, there is an annual heavy metal load of 3036 g zinc and 910 g chromium released to
the sewer.

Waste produced
The quantity of waste from the described plating unit is 10 t/yr (water content 65 %).

Type of refuse
European
waste catalogue
number
Yearly
proportional
quantity
Utilisation/
disposal type
Costs (including
transport)
Cyanide-free waste,
containing chromium
11 01 09 10 t Landfill
EUR 175
per tonne
Table 8.17: Plant E waste produced

Refuse disposal
The waste is disposed of to a special landfill. It has a zinc content of 40 g/kg dry weight.

Costs considerations
The annual costs of the entire galvanic shop amounts to EUR 2.3 million as:

55 % fixed costs of plant depreciation, building, personnel reallocation
35 % variable costs (materials for processes, waste water, maintenance, energy)
10 % direct labour costs: four persons for serving the plating units; related to the zinc
portion of the zinc drum plant 0.67 man-years are calculated with costs per worker of
EUR 56500/yr.

Personnel expenditure for maintenance of the entire plants and the electrolytes (1.2 persons) as
well as operation and maintenance of the effluent treatment (1 person) is contained in the fixed
costs.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 487
The capital outlays for the anodic oxidation cell amounted to EUR 30000 (at 1993 costs). For a
10 year write-off period at EUR 3000/yr, the portion of the rinses containing zinc amounts to
18 %, so the proportional annual amortisation costs for this equipment is EUR 501.

The cost of electricity is set at EUR 0.075/kWh. The costs of fresh water (drinking water) from
public supply amount to EUR 1/m
3
and for the discharge of waste water into the local municipal
sewerage system EUR 1.50/m
3
.
The running costs for Plant E calculated per m
2
are shown in Table 8.18

Specific costs EUR/m
2
Plating process chemicals 0.28 (with anodes 0.35)
Chemicals for waste water treatment 0.19
Electricity for anodic oxidation 0.0015
Water purchase 0.005
Waste water 0.0125
Waste for removal 0.03
Manpower for plant operation 0.61
Manpower for maintenance 0.36
Table 8.18: Plant E unit costs per m
2
Estimated metal loss/efficiency
For reference Plant E, the following typical figures can be derived from the available data:

zinc used on workpieces = 80.6 %
total zinc input = 4036 kg/yr, consisting of zinc metal 99.95 % Zn
zinc lost from the process line = 786 kg/yr, which is 19.4 % of the material used,
consisting of:
o 3 kg/yr to waste water (<0.1 %)
o 600 kg/yr over the waste to removal (14.9 %)
o 183 kg/yr metal recuperated by electrolysis (4.5 %).

Waste water emission (<0.1)
Waste emission (19.4)
Used on workpieces (80.6)
Figure 8.10: Plant E zinc emissions

Annexes
488 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
8.5.5 Reference Plant F

Age of the plant
5 years

Type of plant
Job shop

Production programme of the entire enterprise

plating and chromate finishing of steel parts
copper plating, nickel plating and tin plating of steel parts
copper plating, nickel plating and tin plating of non-ferrous metal parts
silver plating of non-ferrous metal parts
zinc plating and chromating of steel parts.

Production programme of the plating unit described (plant F)
Zinc rack unit including hot soak degreasing, pickling, electrolytically degreasing, plating, blue
chromating, yellow chromating, black chromating.

Throughput
66000 m in 5500 working hours per year

Input materials

Chemicals used for
production
Process step
Annual
consumption
Annual costs
in EUR
Neutral cleaner Hot soak degreasing 500 kg 5000
Sulphuric acid Tenside Pickle 1300 kg
150 l
2500
Slotoclean Electrical degreasing 2000 kg 3000
Hydrochloric acid 30 % Pickle 1250 kg 400
Zinc anodes

Zinc chloride
Potassium chloride
Boric acid
Basic and gloss additive

Zinc electrolyte
10000 kg

0
2500 kg
300 kg
2500 l
13000

0
850
315
7500
Chromium trioxide
ammonium chloride
sodium sulphate sodium
chloride
Yellow chromate
finishing
100 kg 250
Metapas F Black chromate 800 kg 3000
Immonox 3 Blue chromate 400 kg 800
Sum: 36615
Table 8.19: Plant F input materials

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 489
Waste water
treatment plant
Process
tank
14.5 m
Waste water
Filtration
Workpieces
untreated
Workpieces
plated
3
f
o
l
d
c
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
i
n
s
e
+

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
B
l
a
c
k

c
h
r
o
m
a
t
e
Y
e
l
l
o
w
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
e
B
l
u
e

c
h
r
o
m
a
t
e
1.8 m
P
i
c
k
e
l
1.8 m 1.8 m 1.8 m
25 l/h KW
25 l/h circle water from
ion exchanger unit
25 l/h KW
Waste water 50 m/yr
Waste to disposal
Cooling
cristallisation
200 l/yr 400 l/yr
Oil to
thermal
use
200 l/yr
200 kg/yr iron sulphate
4.2 m 2.8 m 10.8 m
Waste pickle
external
reuse 3.3 m/yr
8.4 m/yr
5.6 m/yr
1.85 m/yr
1.85 m/yr
5.5 m/yr
Metapas F 0.8 t/yr
Zn: 10 t/yr
KCl: 2.5 t/yr
H
3
BO
3
: 0.3 t/yr
Additives: 2.5 t/yr
H
2
SO
4
: 1.3 t/yr
Tenside: 0.3 t/yr
Throughput: 66600 m/yr
3
f
o
l
d
c
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
i
n
s
e
+

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
H
o
t

s
o
a
k
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
.

d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
P
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
P
r
e
d
i
p
3
f
o
l
d
c
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
i
n
s
e
+

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
3
f
o
l
d
c
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
i
n
s
e
+

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
3
f
o
l
d
c
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
i
n
s
e
+

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
P
o
s
t

d
i
p
3
f
o
l
d
c
a
s
c
a
d
e
r
i
n
s
e
+

s
p
r
a
y

r
i
n
s
e
P
o
s
t

d
i
p
M
i
c
r
o
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
O
i
l

r
e
m
o
v
a
l
O
i
l

r
e
m
o
v
a
l
O
i
l

r
e
m
o
v
a
l
Slotoclean 2 t/yr
Figure 8.11: Plant F process flow diagram
Annexes
490 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Chemicals used for waste
water treatment *
Process step Annual Consumption
Annual
Costs in EUR
Caustic soda solution 50 %
Hydrochloric acid 30 %
Sodium bisulphite
Caustic sodium dithionite
Waste water
treatment plant
13500 kg
17250 kg
500 kg
800 kg
2300
2900
75
650
Total cost for the total
enterprise
5925
Plant F costs as 20 % of the
total enterprise
1180
Table 8.20: Plant F chemicals used in waste water treatment

Substitution for problem materials used
No substitution of the materials used is currently thought necessary.

Service lifetime of the process solutions

Process step Chemicals Concentration Process
Temperature
(C)
Service
lifetime
Hot soak degreasing Neutral cleaner 2 % (Volume) 50 - 55 26 weeks
Pickling
Sulphuric acid
Tenside
200 g/l 50 - 55 156 weeks
Electrolytic degreasing Slotoclean 50 g/l 50 - 55 26 weeks
Zinc electrolyte See Table 8.19 See Table 8.19 30 infinitely
Pickling Hydrochloric acid 10 g/l 20 1 day
Yellow-chromating
Chromium
chrome trioxide
7.5 g/l 20 52 weeks
Black chromating Metapas F 100 g/l 20 52 weeks
Blue chromating Immunox 3 40 g/l 20 16 weeks
Post dip
treatment
Post dip
solution
7 ml/l 20
Several
weeks
Table 8.21: Plant F service lifetime of process solutions

Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
The zinc electrolyte is not rejected, because the drag out is sufficiently high, so that the
impurities do not achieve a concentration which is harmful to quality.

The zinc electrolyte is filtered in bypass (20 m
3
/h).

The hot soak degreasing solutions are regenerated by a skimmer to remove grease, oil and other
pollutants.

For extension of the service life, iron sulphate is separated in bypass by cooling and
crystallisation from the pickling solution (H
2
SO
4
).

The chromate solution is not regenerated.

Measures for the reduction of drag-out
Spray rinses are installed over all hot degreasing and pickling tanks.

Feedback of dragged-out electrolytes
Feedback from the static rinse into the process tanks is widely used to balance the evaporation
losses.
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 491
Pre-dip of the workpieces in the static rinse of the zinc plating unit results in a 50 % feedback of
dragged out electrolytes.

Rinsing technology
Three step rinsing cascades and regeneration of the rinse-water via ion exchangers is standard.

Waste water treatment
See flow sheet Figure 8.12.

Table 8.22 shows the emission levels of heavy metals.

Limit concentrations
mg/l
Measured concentrations
mg/l
Parameter Value
Self-
monitoring
Analysis by
authority
Analysis by
authority
Chromium total 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.15 0.05
Chromium VI 0.1 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Zinc 2.0 0.1 - 1 0.1 0.33
Copper 0.5 0.06 - 0.1 0.1 0.05
Nickel 0.5 0.1 - 0.15 0.1 0.1
Tin 2.0 <0.4 <0.2 <0.2
Table 8.22: Plant F heavy metals in the waste water

Loads of heavy metals
With a total amount of waste water of 2500 m
3
per year and metal concentrations of 0.3 mg/l Zn
and 0.1 mg/l Cr, heavy metal loads of 750 g zinc and 250 g chromium result are released to the
sewer yearly.
Annexes
492 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Batch treatment
15 m
3
Collecting tank:
alkaline solutions
Collecting tank:
acid solutions
Collecting tank:
acid,
hexavalent chromium
Collecting tank:
acid zinc
Zn rack unit I
Zn rack unit II
Zn drum unit
Ion exchanger
Selective exchanger
Filtration units
NaOH
50 %
HCl
31 %
Na
dithionite
NaHSO
3
solution
Selective
ion exchanger
Selective
ion exchanger
Gravel
filter
Filter press
Final control
sewer
Disposal
120 t/yr
EUR 200/t
Settling
tank
13.5 t/yr
12500 m/yr
0.8 t/yr
Reference plant F waste water treatment plant flow diagram
0.5 t/yr
17.25 t/yr
Figure 8.12: Plant F waste water treatment flow diagram

Waste quantity
The quantity of waste from the described plant amounts to 20 t/yr (water content 65 %). Details
are shown in Table 8.23 and Table 8.24

EWC No Quantity Manner of disposal
Disposal costs
including transport
Electroplating
sludge
11 01 03 20 t Landfill EUR 200 per tonne
Table 8.23: Plant F sludge details

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 493
Metals Content in g/kg dry material
Zinc 210
Copper 5
Nickel 5
Chromium 20
Iron 200
Table 8.24: Plant F metal concentrations the sludge

Refuse disposal
The waste is disposed of in a hazardous waste landfill.

Air pollution control
The hot working processes tanks are equipped with an exhaust fitted on the transporter unit; the
remaining process tanks have edge exhausts.

The exhaust air of 50000 m
3
/h is cleaned with scrubber and droplet separators. The energy costs
for ventilators are EUR 800/yr.

Costs considerations
The capital outlays indicated by the operator are:

EUR 750000 for the rack unit
EUR 360000 for the waste water treatment plant including ion exchanger plant.

of this:

EUR 10000 for the filtering unit for the cleaning of the zinc solution
EUR 25000 for the de-oiling mechanisms including microfiltration
EUR 40000 for the cooling/crystallisation unit.

Annual maintenance cost are:
Plating unit:

EUR 50000 for material
EUR 12500 for personnel and maintenance.

For the periphery plants (production-integrated environmental protection) the following
expenditure on personnel is proportionately necessary for operation and maintenance:

EUR 1250 filtration
EUR 500 de-oiling systems and micro filtration
EUR 500 cooling crystallisation
EUR 131000 the personnel costs for the three-shift operation.

Effluent trteament and ion exchanger unit:

EUR 19000 for material costs
EUR 8000 for maintenance personnel.

The proportionate costs for the plating unit described amount to:

EUR 2000 water consumed
EUR 3000 sewage discharged
EUR 6000 waste disposal.

Annexes
494 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Distribution of the zinc to workpieces, water and waste
The following data are typical for reference plant F:

input zinc 10000 kg/yr, consisting of zinc semi-finished material 99.95 % Zn
emitted zinc = 1681 kg/yr, according to 16.8 % of the material used quantity, consisting
of:
o 0.75 kg/yr in waste water
o 1680 kg/yr in waste.

8.5.6 Reference Plant G

Age of the plant
5 years.

Type of plant
Job shop.

Number of employees
50.

Production programme of the entire enterprise

zinc plating and chromate finishing of steel parts
silver plating
phosphating of steel parts
zinc-iron alloy (zinc ferrous alloy) barrel plating.

Production programme of the plating unit described (Plant G)
Zinc-iron barrel unit (see Figure 8.13) including:

hot soak degreasing
pickling
electrolytic degreasing
zinc-iron plating (alkaline)
yellow chromate finishing
black chromate finishing.

Throughput
157778 m
2
/yr at a weight of 1703 t/yr in 6320 working hours per year

Input materials
See Table 8.25.
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 495
Waste water
treatment plant
Plating
tank
14.5 m
Wate water
Metal sludge to
zinc smelter
Filter
Workpieces untreated
Workpieces plated
S
t
a
t
i
c
r
i
n
s
e
Filter
Surplus sludge
to municipal
landfill
Uni-Bio-Clean:
700 kg/yr
3 f
80 l/h
HCl 30 %:
24 t/yr
F
l
o
w
r
i
n
s
e
60 l/h
1000 l/h
Ekasit:
535 kg/yr
120 l/h
Zn: 10.3 t/yr
NaOH 50 %: 15.0 t/yr
Basis solution: 6.0 t/yr
Iron solution: 2.0 t/yr
P
o
s
t

d
i
p
R
i
n
s
e
Y
e
l
l
o
w
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
N
e
u
t
r
a
l
i
s
a
i
o
n
250 l/h
HCL 30 %:
535 kg/yr
Yellow Gf
plus: 44 kg/yr
Zinfer
plus:
4.7 t/yr
2500 l/h
700 l/h
JT
6.6 m/yr
2.7 m/yr
11.2 m/yr
45 m/yr
900 l 900 l 1100 l 900 l
Ion
exchange
10.6 m/yr
5.3 m/yr
Ion
exchange
Throughput 158000 m/yr or 1760 t/yr
B
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l

c
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
3 f 2 f
B
l
a
c
k

c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
e
d
i
p
B
l
a
c
k

c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
e
d
i
p
P
r
e
d
i
p
P
r
e
d
i
p
P
i
c
k
l
e
2 f
3 f
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
2f = 2 fold 3f = 3 fold
Figure 8.13: Plant G process flow diagram
Annexes
496 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Chemicals used
including brand
names
Process step Concentration
used
Annual
consumption
(kg)
Annual
consumption in
EUR
Uni-bio-clean Hot soak degreasing 50 ml/l 1420 6300
Hydrochloric acid 200 g/l 24300 4600
Acid degreasing
solution
Pickling
25 ml/l 574 1600
Ekasit F 15 % 50 g/l 535 1300
Caustic soda
solution 50 %
Electrolytic
degreasing 150 g/l 8200 1700
Zinc anodes 10276 13600
Caustic soda
solution 50 %
100 150 g/l 15000 3400
Zinc 8 14 g/l
Iron solution 70 200 mg/l 1968 9000
Basic solution
Zinc iron electrolyte
70 120 ml/l 5919 22000
Hydrochloric acid
30 %
Neutralisation 30 g/l 425 81
GF Plus Yellow chromate
finishing
40 ml/l 44 140
Zinfer plus Black chromate
finishing
80 ml/l 9900 35000
Post dip solution
for zinfer plus
Post dip 7 ml/l 892 2600
Total sum for
production
EUR 101321
Caustic soda
solution 50 %
88800
Hydrochloric acid
30 %
41400

Sodium bisulphite 16300
Sodium dithionite 750
Chemical costs for the
entire waste water
plant:
EUR 76000
Antifoaming agent 50
Flocculation agent 125
Lime
Chemicals used in the
waste water treatment
plant
-
1100
Proportionate
chemical costs for the
described unit:
EUR 14000
Table 8.25: Plant G input materials

Substitution for problem materials used
The materials currently used have not required substitution.

Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
All process solutions are regularly analytically supervised and refilled, see Table 8.26. Service
lifetime is shown in Table 8.27. All electrolytes are filtered continuously. As the amount of the
electrolyte drag-out is sufficiently high to keep the impurities under a process-disrupting
concentration, no further measures are necessary. The biological cleaning has likewise an
unlimited service lifetime: only the surplus sludge is removed. The black chromate finishing is
regenerated over ion exchangers. For the remaining process solutions, no special measures are
taken, since the service lifetime obtained in each case is regarded as sufficient from both
ecological and economical points of view.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 497
Process step Material
Refill
quantity
kg/w
Refill cycle
3-shift operation
Analytical
control
Hot soak degreasing Ekasit 2005 -- 2/w 2/w
Hydrochloric acid 30 % 207
Pickling
Acid degreaser 10
3/d 2/w
Caustic soda solution 50 % 180 Electrolytic
degreasing Ekasit F15 20
3/d 2/w
Caustic soda solution 360 3/d
Iron solution 40 continuously
Basis solution 118 continuously
Zinc-iron electrolyte
Gloss additive 100 continuously
2/w
Neutralisation Hydrochloric acid 30 % 8.3 3/d 1/w
Yellow chromate
finishing
AP plus
10 1/w 1/w
Black chromate
finishing
Zinfer plus
150 continuously 2/w
Post dip Zinfer plus post dip solution 6 3/d 2/w
w = weekly; d = daily
Table 8.26: Plant G cycle of monitoring and refill of chemicals

Process step Materials Concentration Service lifetime
Hot soak degreasing Ekasit 2005 50 g/l 8 weeks
Pickle Hydrochloric acid 200 g/l 8 weeks
Caustic soda 50 % 150 g/l
Electrolytic degreasing
Ekasit F 15 20 ml/l
8 weeks
Zinc-iron electrolyte See Table 8.25 See Table 8.25 Infinite
Neutralisation Hydrochloric acid 30 % 1 week
Yellow-chromate AP plus 40 ml/l 4 weeks
Black-chromate Zinfer plus 80 ml/l 4 weeks
Post dip Post dip solution 7 ml/l 8 weeks
Table 8.27: Plant G service lifetime of the process solutions

Measures for the reduction of drag-out
The drums have drillings of 5 mm, in order to achieve a better draining of the liquid. After
leaving the process solution the drums are turned to get a better drianing off. The draining off
times amount to approximately 15 seconds. Thus the electrolyte drag out is reduced with acid
solutions to approximately 11 l/h and with alkaline solutions to approximately 15 l/h
(throughput of 5 drums/h).

Feedback of dragged-out electrolytes
The feedback of dragged-out electrolytes takes place by different paths:

evaporation losses of the degreasing bath are made up from the first static rinse
pre dip is done in the static rinses of the pickles, the electrolytic degreasing, zinc iron
electrolytes and the black chromate finishing.

Rinsing technology
The layout of the rinsing technology is generally a three step cascade rinse often supplemented
by an additional static rinse. Depending on the requirements of the rinsing conditions a two-step
cascade with a following flow rinse with demineralised water is partly inserted.

The rinsing processes are operated with water from the public supply. Demineralised water is
used for the cascade rinses after pickling.

Annexes
498 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Waste water treatment
Waste water treatment is in a central plant for all production units (see Figure 8.14), and the
zinc-iron plant is only a part (25 %) of the input waste water. The resulting waste water for the
selected plant (zinc/ferrous alloy separation) amounts to 3750 m
3
/yr. Emission levels are shown
in Table 8.28.

Rack unit acid
Barrel unit Zn/yr
Barrel unit Zn/Fe
Barrel unit Zn-Ni
Ion exchanger
Selective exchanger
Filters
Collecting tank
alkaline concentrates 10 m
Collecting tank, acid,
chromium containing 10 m
Collecting tank
alkaline solutions 10 m
NaHSO
3
NaOH 50 %
HCl 30 %
Ca(OH)
2
Batch treatment
15 m
Post treatment
15 m
Selective
ion
exchanger
Recycling to
zinc smelter
Collecting tank
acid concentrates 10 m
16.3 t/yr
15000 m/yr
120 t/yr
EUR 165/t
Buffer tank
10 m
41.4 t/yr
88.8 t/yr
Final control
sewer
2.8 t/yr
Gravel
filter
Filterpress
Sludge store and
sedimentation
15 m
Selective
ion
exchanger
Figure 8.14: Plant G waste water treatment plant flow diagram

Concentration values mg/l
Parameter Limit values Self-control
External
analysis
External
analysis
Chromium total 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3
Chromium (VI) 0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <0.01
Zinc 2.0 1.0 - 1.3 1.0 1.1
Table 8.28: Plant G waste water emission values for heavy metals

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 499
Loads of heavy metals in the waste water
Annual heavy metal load of 3900 g zinc and 1120 g chromium

Waste produced
The quantity of the electroplating sludge of the described plant amounts to 30 tonnes yearly. It
contains on average 198 g/kg zinc related to the dry material (water content approximately
60 %), see Table 8.29. Due to the high zinc content the sludge is suitable for recycling in a zinc
smelter. The recycling costs including transport amounts to EUR 165/t. The total loss of zinc via
the waste route amounts to 2376 kg/yr.

Metal Amount lost in sludge
Zinc 198 g/kg dry material
Lead 0.4 g/kg dry material
Cadmium 0.1 g/kg dry material
Arsenic 0.1 g/kg dry material
Iron 129 g/kg dry material
Calcium oxide 40 g/kg dry material
Table 8.29: Plant G composition of the waste water treatment sludge

Typical consumptions and costs
The costs shown shown below are summarised in Table 8.30 as costs per tonne and per m3
processed.

Personnel costs
For plating plant: about EUR 138000/yr.

Energy costs per year

EUR 53000 plating shop
EUR/1750 heating
EUR 2500 waste water treatment.

Capital outlays

EUR 200000 for the drum plant
EUR 12500 for filtering units for the cleaning of the feeds (zinc iron)
EUR 10000 for the de-oiling mechanism
EUR 5000 for a recovery of the black chromate finishing
EUR 7500 for freezing out equipment
EUR 14000 (proportionate amount) for a biological cleaning
EUR 300000 for the waste water treatment plant
EUR 68000 for the cycle ion exchanger plant.

Maintenance and maintenance cost
Drum plant: EUR 16000/yr for material; EUR 16900 for personnel

Periphery plants: expenditure for personnel:

EUR 33800/yr filtration
EUR 22500/yr de-oiling
EUR 33800/yr recovery of chromate finishing
EUR 1100/yr freezing out installation
EUR 22500/yr biological cleaning.

Annexes
500 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
EUR/tonne EUR/m
2
Process chemicals plating (Zn-Fe): 40 0.49
Chemicals for waste water treatment 11 0.12
Energy (river + long-distance heating) 32 0.35
Water purchase 2.25 0.0025
Waste water 6.6 0.07
Waste 2.9 0.03
Investment 20 0.22
Maintenance P/M 85 0.91
Personnel for plant 80 0.85
Table 8.30: Plant G costs per tonne and per m
2
processed

Zinc inputs and outputs
For reference Plant G the following characteristic numbers can be calculated from the available
data:

input zinc = 10276 kg/yr, consisting of zinc metal 99.95 % Zn
emitted zinc = 2380 kg/yr, according to 23 % of the material used, consisting of
o 3.9 kg/yr with the waste water
o 2376 kg/yr with the waste.

8.5.7 Reference plant H

Age of the plant
6 years.

Type of plant
In-house shop.

Number of employees
60.

Production programme of the entire enterprise

acid zinc plating one barrel unit
zinc-iron plating two barrel units
zinc-nickel plating one rack unit (alkaline technique)
zinc-nickel plating one rack unit (acid technique)
zinc-iron plating one rack unit
acid zinc plating one rack unit.

Production programme of the described unit
The unit is a computer-controlled zinc-nickel rack unit (alkaline technique) with variable
treatment times. The process steps are: hot degreasing, pickling, electrolytically degreasing,
pickling, galvanizing (zinc-nickel), transparent chromating, yellow chromating, black
chromating and sealing (see Figure 8.15). The input materials are shown in Table 8.31.

Throughput
With a production time of approximately 6000 hours per year the throughput is approximately
200000 m
2
surface of steel workpieces which are plated and chromated or sealed. The medium
capacity amounts approximately 6.3 racks or 33 m
2
per hour respectively. The unit operates
daily in a 3-shift operation.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 501
Waste water treatment plant
Process
Tank
14.5 m
Waste water
to sewer
Waste to recycling
proportionate 60 t/yr
Filter
Workpieces Workpieces
plated
Hot soak
degreasing
Three fold
cascade
R
i
n
s
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c

D
e
g
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
Zn: 23.0 t/yr
NaOH 50 %: 40.6 t/yr
Ni-supplement: 68.4 t/yr
Other supplement: 29.0 t/yr
Y
e
l
l
o
w
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
Ekasit:
7.8 t/yr
S
e
a
l
i
n
g
Z
n
-
s
o
l
v
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
e
d
i
p
3.7 m 4.67 m
3.7 m
3.7 m
14.8 m/yr
22 m/yr
7.4 m/yr
9.4 m/yr
16 m 12 m 8.1m 4 m
Belt
filter
Waste acid to
recycling
12 m
3
/yr
5.5 m
3
/yr
24.3 m
3
/yr
(70 % FS)
Cooling
crystali-
sation
CN-removal
Ion
exchanger
2 f
Throughput: 200000 m/yr
Oil
separator
2f = 2 fold 3f = 3 fold
HCl:
1.2 t/yr
HCl:
202 t/yr
Ekasit:
5 t/yr
Zn T11:
21.6 t/yr
Sl 11:
2.5 t/yr
Zn 61:
17 t/yr
2 f 3 f
3 f
3 f
R
i
n
s
e
R
i
n
s
e
3 f
2 f
P
r
e
d
i
p
P
i
c
k
l
e
S
h
o
r
t

p
i
c
k
l
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
a
r
e
n
t

c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
c
B
l
a
c
k

c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
E
v
a
p
o
r
a
t
o
r
Figure 8.15: Plant H process flow diagram
(for key to input materials, see Table 8.31)
Annexes
502 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Chemicals Process steps
Volume
litres
Concentration
Annual
consumption
kg
Annual
consumption
in EUR
Degreasing
agent Ekasit
Water based
degreasing
16000 7 % 5000
HCl 30 % Pickling 12500 200 g/l 202000
Ekasit AK Electrolytic
degreasing
8100 75 g/l 7800
HCl 30 % short pickling 4000 10 g/l 1250
Zinc anodes 23080
NaOH Zn 8 g/l 40600
EGL2 56000 Ni 3 g/l 68400
Zn 51 120 g/l 3600
Zn 52 160 g/l 3000
Zn 53 25 g/l 7200
Zn 56
Zinc-nickel
electrolyte
50 ml/l 15200
Slotopas SI 11 Yellow
chromating
3740 70 g/l/l 2500
Slotopas Zn 61 Black
chromating
4670 120 g/l 17000
Slotopas Zn-
T11
Blue chromating 3700 60/300 ml/l 21600
Total EUR 580000
Table 8.31: Plant H input material

Substitution for problem materials
The introduction of Cr(III) in blue chromating is intended. This could lead to a major
substitution for Cr(VI) compounds.

Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
The period of the analytical monitoring as well as the service life of the process solutions are
indicated in Table 8.32.

The service life of the electrolytes for all plating processes is almost infinite. The drag out
combined with the continuous filtration (50 m
3
/h) and the removal of carbonate via a cooling
crystallisation unit is sufficiently high that no contaminations rise over a quality-limiting value.

The hot degreasing unit consists of three stations (one pre-degreasing and two post-degreasing
steps), which are connected as cascade. The pre degreasing unit is equipped with an oil stripper
and band filter to remove oil and grease, so that a bath lifetime of one year is achieved. The
evaporating losses at 70 C of 40 50 l/h are sufficient to be able to feed back the total rinse-
water of the following three-step cascade.

A service life extension of the pickling solution could not be achieved economically, therefore
the pickling solution is sold after a service life of three weeks for utilisation in a hot dip zinc
coating plant.

The electrolytic degreasing has a service lifetime of four months due to very good pre-
degreasing. Additional measures are not considered necessary. The evaporating losses at 50 C
in combination with a three-fold cascade are sufficient to feed back the total drag out.

The black chromate process solution is regenerated by means of ion exchange, whereby a
significant extension of the service lifetime was achieved.

The yellow and transparent chromate solutions are not regenerated because of the complex
chemical composition.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 503
Process step
Input
chemicals
Top up frequency
(3 shift operation)
Analytical
control
frequency
Service
lifetime
Degreasing Ekasit 2/week 1/week 52 weeks
Pickling
HCl 30 % 2/week 1/week 3 weeks
external re-use
Electrolytic degreasing Ekasit AK 2/week 1/week 17 weeks
Pickling HCl 30 % 2/week 1/week 13 weeks
Plating NaOH Continuously Ni 2/day Infinite
EGL 2 Zn online
Zn 51
Zn 52
Zn 53
Yellow chromating Slotopas SI 11 2/week 2/week 13 weeks
Black chromating
Slotopas
Zn-T 11
2/week 2/week 26 weeks
Blue chromating Slotopas Zn 61 2/week 1/week 26 weeks
Table 8.32: Plant H top up cycle and service lifetime of the process solutions

Measures for reduction of the drag out
Viscosity is reduction of the for all degreasing and the pickling solutions by adding tensides.

The draining times over the process baths are optimised, so that the dragged-out volume for
each process bath does not exceed 5 l/h on an average.

Feed back of dragged-out process solutions
Rinse-water from hot pretreatment processes is fed back. This results in a large feedback of the
process chemicals (the amount of rinse-water and evaporation losses are in an equilibrium)

Drip trays on the transporter collect the rest of the electrolytes (5 l/h) from the zinc nickel
electrolyte which are fed back.

Pre-dipping (eco-rinse) in the static rinse of the black chromate results in a 50 % feedback of the
black chromate solution.

Rinsing technology
The layout of the rinsing technology is generally a three step cascade rinse after each process
step with a spray device over the rinsing liquid of the final stage.

Some processes, e.g. chromating, are usually equipped with two-step cascades in combination
with a spray rinse constructed as a ring over the final stage.

A central ion exchange unit is used for several plating lines for the recycling of rinse-water.

Annexes
504 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Rack unit Zn acid
Rack unit Zn/Ni
Rack unit Zn/Ni acid
Rack unit Zn/Fe
Barrel unit Zn/acid
Barrel units (2) Zn/Fe
Ion exchanger
Collecting tank:
conc. alkaline 16 m
Collecting tank:
acid: chromium
Collecting tank:
alkaline
Collecting tank:
ZnFe alkaline
Collecting tank
ZnNi alkaline
concentrate from vacuum
evaporator
NaHSO
3
NaOH 50 %
HCl 31 %
Polysulphide
Batch treatment
24 m
Batch treatment
9 m
Sludge
collecting tank
14 m
Filter-
press
pH
correction
Final control
sewer
Recycling
Collecting tank:
conc. acid 11 m
12500 m/yr
290 t/yr
70 % dry material
EUR 160/t recycling costs
Disposal
229 t/yr
21.6 t/yr
240 t/yr
54 t/yr
F
i
n
a
l
N
e
u
t
r
a
l
i
s
a
t
i
o
n
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
i
o
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
i
o
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
G
r
a
v
e
l
f
i
l
t
e
r
Figure 8.16: Plant H waste water treatment plant flow diagram

Waste water treatment
The waste water treatment is carried out in a central unit for all water-related production units,
and the zinc-nickel line discussed represents only one part of the total amount and spectrum of
the effluent (see Figure 8.16). The waste water treatment unit consists of two separately
operating batch treatment units.The treated effluent is lead over a gravel filter followed by a
final neutralisation in the final pH control stage. The hydroxide sludge is pumped to a filter
press and then dried to 70 % solid content. Table 8.33 shows the usual emissionlevels achieved.

Measured values mg/l
Parameter
Monitoring value
mg/l Internal control Authority control
Total Cr 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4
Cr(VI) 0.1 <0.05 <0.05
Zn 2.0 1.6 1.8 1.7
Ni 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.4
Table 8.33: Plant H metal concentrations in the waste water

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 505
Within a volume of 40 m
3
per week and an average concentration of 1.7 mg/l Zn and 0.4 mg/l
Cr, an annual heavy metal load 3400 g zinc and 800 g chromium is discharged from this
production unit to sewage.

Waste
The main source of waste is the sludge formed during the waste water treatment. It totals up to
60 tonnes with 70 % solid content, see Table 8.34.

Waste category
European
waste
catalogue No
Annual
amount
Recycling/disposal
technique
Costs for
recycling/disposal
including
transport EUR
Cyanide free waste which
does not contain chromium
11 01 03 60 t
Recycling in a
metal work
160
Waste pickle 210 t
Use as pickle in a
hot dip galvanising
plant
175
Waste soda
(cyanide containing)
24 t Chemical treatment 750
Table 8.34: Plant H waste quantities

The annual losses of zinc within the waste are as follows:

60000 kg sludge x 0.7 solid content x 0.200 g zinc/kg dry sludge = 8400 kg

Further consumption figures for the zinc-nickel rack unit
The operating electrical loads of the individual plant elements are:

automated plating line 587 kVA
rectifiers 567 kVA
filtration zinc bath 2.4 kVA
microfiltration 2.2 kVA
de-oiling 1 kVA
cooling crystallisation 1 kVA
compressed air 55 kVA
dosing equipment 5 kVA
waste water treatment unit including ion exchanger unit 30 kVA.

The exhaust air of approximately 75000 m
3
/h is cleaned with scrubber and mist eliminators.

Costs considerations
Investment costs:

EUR 2000000 for the rack unit
EUR 450000 for the waste water treatment unit

Operating costs:

EUR 126000 for annual maintenance
EUR 720000 for personnel costs for the three-shift operation
For 6000 operation hours:
o EUR 150000 for electricity
o EUR 25000 for gas.

Annexes
506 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Costs for water and waste management:

EUR 70000 for waste water treatment and ion exchanger unit
EUR 3800 for fresh water
EUR 6500 for sewage charge
EUR 61000 for waste disposal.

The operational costs are shown per m
2
in Table 8.35

Costs EUR/m
2
Process chemicals galvanisation 5.5
Chemicals for waste water treatment 0.37
Energy 1.75
Fresh water 0.04
Waste water 0.07
Waste disposal 0.61
Table 8.35: Plant H consumption costs EUR/m
2
Estimated metal loss/efficiency
For Reference Plant H, the following figures can be calculated from the available data:

input zinc: 23080 kg/yr, consisting of zinc semi-finished material 99.95 % Zn
emitted zinc: 8400 kg/yr, according to 36.4 % of the input material, resulting in:
o 3.4 kg/yr to sewage
o 8400 kg/yr to waste.

8.5.8 Reference plant K

Age of the plant
13 years.

Type of plant
In-house shop.

Production programme of the entire enterprise

mechanical processing
zinc plating
chromate finishing
phosphating of screws and washers.

Production programme of the barrel plating unit
See Figure 8.17

hot soak degreasing
pickling
electrolytic degreasing
zinc plating (acid)
copper stripping (cyanide)
zinc plating (cyanide)
chromate finishing (blue, yellow and black)
phosphating.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 507
Throughput
3294 t/yr (mainly small screws and washers) at 6800 working hours per year

Input materials

Chemicals Process step
Quantity
litres
Working
concentration
Annual
consumption
(kg)
Annual
consumption
in EUR
Degreasing
concentrate
Hot soak
degreasing
5000 50 g/l 4000 7000
HCl Pickle 4000 160 g/l 48400 9000
Sodium hydroxide Electrolytic
degreasing
4000 100 g/l 1400 500
Zinc anodes 53200 84000
Zinc chloride 40 g/l 6960 5080
KCl 40000 180 g/l 1920 1143
Boric acid
Zinc electrolyte
25 g/l 9600 33000
Cr-trioxide
Ammonium chloride
Sodium sulphate
Sodium chloride
Yellow chromate
finishing
600 7.5 g/l 6000 14000
Black chromate
solution
Black chromate
finishing
600 100 g/l 15000 47000
Blue chromate
solution
Blue chromate
finishing
600 40 ml/l
Post dip solution Post dip 3700 10 g/l 890 2600
Plating chemicals Plating unit 203323
Caustic soda solution
50 %
5640 1270
Hydrochloric acid
30 %
7560 1135
Sodium bisulphite
Waste water
treatment plant
-- -- 1250 306
Total cost of
chemicals for waste
water treatment

2711
Table 8.36: Plant K input material
Annexes
508 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Waste water treatment plant
Diaphragm
electrolysis
Workpieces untreated Workpieces
plated
B
l
u
e
-
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
R
i
n
s
e
Y
e
l
l
o
w
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
e
B
l
a
c
k
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
Drum unit
P
i
c
k
l
i
n
g
A
c
t
i
v
a
t
i
n
g
Oil-
separator
Liquid
waste
7.4 m
3
/yr
Oil
16 m/yr
4 m 3 m 0.6 m 0.6 m -0.6 m 0.6 m
Evaporator II
Water for rinsing
purposes
(1000 l/h)
2.4 m/yr
2.4 m/yr
8 m/yr
2.4 m/yr
2.4 m/yr
Water to
rinse cascades
Process
tank
40 m
4 m 5 m
100 % 50 % 95 %
1.8 t/yr Zinc
Salty waste to underground
salt mine deposit
Zn: 53.2 t/yr
KCl: 7 t/yr
H

BO

: 1.9 t/yr
Organics: 9.6 t/yr
Filter
A
l
k
a
l
i
n
e
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
Throughput: 3294 t/yr
Electroplating sludge to
hazardous waste landfill
R
i
n
s
e
R
i
n
s
e
C
a
s
c
a
d
e

r
i
n
s
e
3 f
C
a
s
c
a
d
e

r
i
n
s
e
3 f
C
a
s
c
a
d
e

r
i
n
s
e
2 f
C
a
s
c
a
d
e

r
i
n
s
e
1 f
C
a
s
c
a
d
e

r
i
n
s
e
3 f
C
a
s
c
a
d
e

r
i
n
s
e
3 f
Evaporator 1
P
o
s
t
-
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
A
n
o
d
i
c
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
Figure 8.17: Plant K process flow diagram
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 509
Substitution for problem materials used
Currently there is no substitution of the materials used.

Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
The service lifetime of the process solutions is shown in Table 8.37

Process step Chemicals Concentration Temperature Service lifetime
Hot soak degreasing Sodium hydroxide 50 g/l 70 26 weeks
Pickle Hydrochloric acid 160 g/l 20 13 weeks
electrolytic
degreasing
Sodium hydroxide
50 g/l 55 26 weeks
Zinc electrolyte See Table 8.36 See Table 8.36 30 Infinite
Yellow-chromate Chromium
trioxide
7.5 g/l 13 weeks
Black chromate Chromium
trioxide
20 g/l 13 weeks
Blue chromate Chromium III salt 1 g/l 13 weeks
Table 8.37: Plant K service lifetime of the process solutions

The service lifetime of the zinc electrolyte is infinite. This is achieved by continuous filtration
and diaphragm electrolysis in combination with the natural drag out.

The solution for the hot soak degreasing is pumped to an oil separator to remove the free oil.

The electrolytic degreasing solution is filtered to remove the sludge.

The chromating solutions are given special treatments because of the complex chemical
composition. The service lifetime reached in each case is regarded as sufficient from ecological
and economical points of view.

The cycle of monitoring and refill of chemicals is shown in Table 8.38

Process step Chemicals Refill quantity
Analytic
control
frequency
Hot soak degreasing Tenside No data 1/week
Pickle station
Sulphuric acid conc.,
tenside
No data 1/week
Electrolytic degreasing
Caustic soda solution 50 %
Slotoclean
No data 1/week
Calcium chloride 50 kg/week 1/week
Boric acid 6 kg/week Continuously Zinc electrolyte
Basic + gloss additives 50 kg/week Continuously
Pickling Hydrochloric acid 30 % No data
Daily new
beginning
Yellow chromating Chromium trioxide No data 2/week
Blue chromating Chrome (III) salt No data 2/week
Black chromating
Chromium trioxide silver
salt
No data 1/week
Table 8.38: Plant K cycle of monitoring and refill of chemicals

Measures to reduce the drag-out
In all plating processes, the draining-off procedure of the electrolyte is optimised, by optimising
the drum body and regime of drum turning.

Annexes
510 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Feedback of dragged-out process solutions
The feedback of dragged-out process solutions takes place by different routes:

in warm working process solutions (degreasing) the evaporation losses are
supplemented by the rinse-water of the compact rinse, so 90 % of the hot degreasing
solution and 50 % of the electrolytic degreasing solution are fed back
the rinse from the electrolyte is concentrated by a vacuum evaporator and the re-
concentrated electrolyte is completely recycled. The distillate from the evaporator is
used for rinsing purposes (see Figure 8.18.)

Plating tank Rinse tank
6 5 4 3 2 1
Evaporator
Holding tank
Pump
Workpieces
Spray rinse
Floor
Distilled water
Concentrate
Figure 8.18: Plant K six step cascade rinse

Multi-stage rinsing with limited line space
The rinsing technology for the plating process is a six fold compact rinsing system described in
4.7.10.4 (See Figure 8.18). After the plating tank, the barrel is placed in an empty tank. This is
sequentially filled from and drained to six off-line tanks, each holding what is, in effect, a static
rinse water. When the first (most concentrated) rinse water reaches a critical concentration it is
pumped to the evaporator. The concentrate is returned to the plating bath and the condensed
distilled water is used in fresh rinsing. The entire process takes 60 seconds.

After the remaining process steps, rinses are two- or three-fold cascade rinses.

Waste water treatment with subsequent evaporation (waste water free operation)
The waste water treatment plant is a central unit for the entire plant, so that the plating unit
discussed represents only a part of the total waste water. In each case, before the chemical
oxidation and reduction, there is an anodic oxidation and a cathodic reduction. After
precipitation, sedimentation and dewatering of the primary sludge takes place in a filter press.
The filtrate is sent to the evaporator. The distillate (1000 l/h) is re-used for rinsing processes.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 511
Zinc plating
Phosphating
Filter units
Collecting tank
acid/alkaline
(V = 20 m)
HCl
Batch treatment
Filter press
Disposal
Sludge 38 t/yr
(70 % TS)
EUR 170/t
disposal costs
Sodium bisulphite
NaOH 50 %
Collecting tank cyanide
(V = 20 m)
Collecting tank
chromium (VI)
containing
(V = 20 m)
2 m 2 m 2 m
Distillate
600 l/h
Salt 67 t/yr
Disposal costs
EUR 260/t
5000 m/yr
NaOCL
Evaporator
22 t/yr
4.2 t/yr
40 t/yr
2.7 t/yr
Figure 8.19: Plant K waste water treatment plant flow diagram

Waste amount
The main quantity of the resulting wastes arise from the solids (sludge), formed during the
waste water treatment (precipitation and evaporation). See Table 8.39.

Type of waste EWC no Yearly amount Disposal
Costs incl.
transport
EUR per tonne
Cyanide free wastes 11 01 03 21 t (70 % dry matter) Landfill 500
Salt from evaporator 37 t
Deposit in salt
mines
270
Table 8.39: Plant K waste quantities

Annexes
512 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Costs
The capital costs for the entire plant including the water free process technique is:
EUR 4000000.

of this:

EUR 900000 for vapour evaporator I
EUR 250000 for vapour evaporator II
EUR 100000 for disk drier
EUR 125000 for diaphragm electrolysis, filter and dosing technology.

Proportionate annual maintenance costs for the plating unit are:

EUR 25000 for material
EUR 46000 for personnel.

Zinc inputs and outputs
For reference plant K the following zinc balance can be calculated from the available data:

input zinc = 53200 kg/yr, consisting of zinc semi-finished material 99.95 % Zn
emitted zinc = 5320 kg/yr, according to 10 % of the material input. Emission paths
o 0 kg/yr via waste water
o 5320 kg/yr via waste.

8.5.9 Reference Plant L

Age of the plant
8 years.

Type of plant
Job shop.

Number of employees
68.

Production programme of the entire enterprise
plating zinc cyanide and alkaline rack unit
plating zinc cyanide and acid rack and drum unit
1 x chromium plating: rack unit
1 x chromium plating: manual unit
tin, nickel and chromium-plating: manual unit
chemically nickel plating: manual unit.

Production program of the described unit (cyanide zinc plating)
See Figure 8.20:
hot soak degreasing
pickling,
electrolytic degreasing
cyanide zinc plating
clarification
transparency chromate finishing
yellow chromate finishing
black chromate finishing.

Throughput
468000 m
2
/yr at 7200 working hours per year
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 513
Process tank
- 75 m
Waste water
treatment plant
Waste water
Filter
Workpieces
untreated
Workpieces
plated
2f
Y
e
l
l
o
w
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
C
l
a
r
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
9 m 2 fold
8.5 m
Waste to disposal
28 m 12 m
72 m/yr
455 m/yr
H
o
t

s
o
a
k
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
1 m
Evaporator
21 m 14 m
Cooling/
crystallisation
50 l/h
30 l/h
35 l/h
83.6 m/yr
Oil
Skimmer
Waste oil
3 t/yr
Concentrate
345 m/yr
55 l/h Distillate
Zn: 52 t/yr
NaCN: 11.2 t/yr
NaOH: 15 t/yr
Additional: 12.3 t/yr
2.8 m
HCl: 150 t/yr
Ekasit: 5.5 t/yr
Ekasit: 6.9 t/yr
Throughput: 468000 m/yr
B
l
u
e
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
l
y
t
i
c
d
e
g
r
e
a
s
e
3f
R
i
n
s
e
R
i
n
s
e
P
i
c
k
l
e
R
i
n
s
e
R
i
n
s
e
P
r
e
d
i
p
S
t
a
t
i
c
r
i
n
s
e
R
i
n
s
e
R
i
n
s
e
R
i
n
s
e
R
i
n
s
e
B
l
a
c
k
c
h
r
o
m
a
t
i
n
g
R
i
n
s
e
Oil separator
179 m/yr
80 m/yr
2f = 2 fold 3f = 3 fold
Figure 8.20: Plant L process flow diagram
Annexes
514 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Input material

Chemicals Process step Concentration
Annual
consumption
in tonnes
Annual
consumption
in EUR
Ekasit 2005 Hot soak degreasing 50 g/l 5.5 8250
Hydrochloric acid
31 %
Pickle 200 g/l 150 38000
Pickle degreaser 25 g/l 5.5 5500
Ekasit
Electrolytic
degreasing
55 g/l 6.9 10350
Zinc anodes 51.98 70135
Zinc oxide 20 g/l 2.77 6925
Sodium cyanide 60 g/l 11225 32552
Sodium hydroxide 92 g/l 15.06 18825
Gloss medium
Zinc plating
12.3 32900
Nitric acid Clarification 10 g/l 7.6 3790
Basic solution
Yellow chromate
finishing
1 g/l Cr(VI) - 0.55 5500
Basic solution
Black chromate
finishing
20 g/l Cr(VI)
250 mg/l Ag
7.5 25000
Pro-seal X-Z 111
Blue chromate
finishing
1 g/l 6.35 31750
Post dip solution Post dip 10 g/l 1.5 1500
Total sum of inputs 290977
Caustic soda 50 % 40 24000
HCl 30 % 75 33000
sodium bisulphite 15 10200
sodium dithionite 2.5 8200
lime 10 2500
sodium hypochlorite
Waster water
treatment
111 60000
Sum of waste water
treatment chemicals
137900
Table 8.40: Plant L input material for plating and waste water treatment

Substitution of problem materials used
It is intended to replace the cyanide zinc electrolytes by alkaline cyanide free electrolytes.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 515
Measures for extending the service lifetime of solutions
Analytic control, refill cycle and service lifetime of the process solutions is shown in Table 8.41

Process step Chemical Refill cycle
Analytic control
frequency
Service lifetime
Hot degreasing University bio clean 3/week 1/w 15 weeks
Pickle
HCl 30 % +
Pickle degreaser
3/day 1/w 8 weeks
Electrolytic
degreasing
Caustic soda solution
50 %
Ekasit F15
3/d 1/w 7 weeks
Sodium hydroxide 3/w Zn 5/w
Basis solution Continuously CN 5/w Zinc electrolyte
Gloss additive Continuously OH 3/w
Infinite
Lighten Nitric acid conc. 3/d 1/w 1 week
Yellow-chromate AP plus 3/w 3/w 8 weeks
Blue chromate
finishing
X Z 111
3/w 3/w 2 weeks
Black chromate
finishing
ZBL-T
3/w 3/w 8 weeks
Sealing Post dip solution 2/w 2/w Infinite
Table 8.41: Plant L analytic control, refill cycle and service lifetime of the process solutions

The service lifetime of the zinc electrolyte is infinite. This is reached by the natural drag-out, a
continuous filtration of the electrolyte and the installation of a cooling crystallisation unit to
remove the carbonate.

For the remaining process solutions, no special treatments are carried out. A membrane
filtration for the hot soak degrease solution did not work satisfactorily. The concentration of
rinse-water from the chromate finishing solutions by means of reverse osmosis also failed.

Measures to reduce the drag-out
The draining times were optimised to a uniform 15 seconds. When pipes are plated, drag-out is
strongly decreased by hanging them diagonally on the racks.

Feedback of dragged-out process solutions
The feedback of dragged-out electrolytes takes place two different routes:

evaporation losses of the hot active baths are made up from the first rinsing tank after
the treatment tank. The quantity of rinse-water feedback amounts to 30 40 l/h
evaporation of the entire rinse-water after the plating tank by means of vacuum
evaporators and feedback of the concentrate (6 l/h) as well as use of the distillate for
rinsing purposes after the plating (30 l/h and 25 l/h).

Rinsing technology
The rinsing technology is generally a three step rinsing cascade in each case.

Exception to the three step rinsing processes are made after chromating. Here, one step rinsing
of the chromate finishing is fed with circulating water from the ion exchanger.

In some cases, additional spraying flushing is used over the fluid level of the tank. For this, the
spray of the last rinse is fed with 30 35 l/h demineralised water.

Due to high drag-out when pipes are plated, the hot soak degreasing and the pickle are equipped
with one additional rinse step with demineralised water from the ion exchanger.

Annexes
516 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Waste water treatment
The waste water treatment plant is a central plant for all water-using production units, and the
zinc plant described represents only one part of the total spectrum of the input waste water (see
Figure 8.21).

The pretreatment and final treatment is carried out in two treatment tanks, one for cyanide
streams and one for chromate streams with 30 m
3
for each tank. After pretreatment and
precipitation, there is sedimentation in settling tanks and dewatering of the sludge takes place in
two filter presses. The cleaned water is transmitted to the sewer via a gravel filter, a final cation
exchanger, a final neutralisation and the final pH adjustment.

The described plants produce 75 m/week of waste water.

The heavy metal of concentrations measured in the waste water are descibed in Table 8.42.

Control analysis mg/l Parameter Limit values
mg/l Internal External External
Total Cr 0.5 0.3 <0.05 <0.05
Cr (VI) 0.1 <0.01 <0.05 <0.05
Zinc 2.0 0.9 1.2 0.22 <0.22
Cyanide 0.2 0.24 <0.05
Table 8.42: Plant L concentration of heavy metals in the waste water after treatment

With a waste water quantity of 75 m
3
per week and average metal concentrations of 0.22 mg/l
Zn and <0.05 mg/l Cr, there are annual heavy metal loads of 825 g zinc and a maximum of
187 g chromium.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 517
Rack unit I
Rack unit II
Manual plating unit
Ion exchanger
Selective exchanger
Filters
Collecting tank
acid concentrates 5 m
HCl
Ca(OH)
2
Batch
treatment
Cr-VI
15 m
Batch
treatment
cyanide
15 m
Settling tank
Filter press
Final control
Waste to disposal
Disposal costs EUR 135/t
10 t/yr
6000 m/yr
NaOH 50 %
NaHSO
3
Collecting tank
acid, Cr-VI
Collecting tank genral
waste water
Collecting tank
cyanide
Collecting tank cyanidic
concentrates 3.2 m
Settling tank
Sewer
NaOCl 12 % Cl active
40 t/yr
15 t/yr
111 t/yr
F
i
n
a
l
N
e
u
t
r
a
l
i
s
a
t
i
o
n
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
i
o
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
i
o
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
r
G
r
a
v
e
l
f
i
l
t
e
r
75 t/yr
Electroplating sludge
329 t/yr
Figure 8.21: Plant L waste water treatment plant flow diagram

Waste generated

Type of refuse EWC no.
Yearly
quantity
tonnes
Disposal
route
Disposal costs
including transport
EUR/tonne
Cyanide free wastes, which
contain chromium
11 01 03 181
Landfill 135
Cyanide containing wastes
11 01 01 9
Thermal
destruction
640
Waste oil 11 01 07 3 Thermal re-use 470
Table 8.43: Plant L waste-quantities

Annexes
518 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Content in g/kg dry matter
Zinc 200 (median value)
Iron 42
Cadmium <0.1
Arsenic <0.1
Solid content 40 %
Table 8.44: Plant L composition of electroplating sludge for metallurgical recycling

Costs
The capital costs indicated by the operator are:

EUR 1500000 for the zinc plant
EUR 845000 for the waste water treatment plant (entire)
EUR 63000 for the cycle ion exchanger unit (proportionate)
EUR 35000 for filtering units (zinc)
EUR 10000 for the de-oiling mechanism
EUR 32500 for cooling crystallisation unit
EUR 125000 for the evaporator.

Annual maintenance costs for the plating plant:

EUR 40000/yr for material
EUR 40000/yr for personnel.

For the peripheral plants (production-integrated environmental protection) the following
personnel expenditure is proportionately necessary for operation and maintenance:

Filtration, de-oiling mechanism, cooling crystallisation:
o EUR 10000/yr.

Waste water treatment and cycle ion exchanger plant (proportionate):
o EUR 7500/yr for material
o EUR 50000/yr for personnel.

Table 8.45 shows the costs for Plant L as EUR/m
2
treated:

EUR/m
2
Process chemicals galvanisation: 0.31
Chemicals for waste water treatment 0.15
Energy (river + long-distance heating) 0.24
Water purchase 0.025
Waste water and waste 0.08
Investment 0.56
Maintenance personnel/material 0.34
Table 8.45: Plant L costs as EUR/m
2
treated

Zinc inputs and outputs
For plant L the following are typical data:

input zinc: = 51980 kg/yr, consisting of zinc semi-finished material 99.95 % Zn
emitted zinc = 14481 kg/yr, according to 27.86 % of the input material:
o via the waste water path = 0.8 kg/yr
o via the waste path = 14480 kg/yr .
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 519
8.6 Chromium usage for typical small decorative plating lines

This is one of three similar lines and typical of many chromium plating plants. The rinsing
technique has some commonly used techniques for closing the loop: but the materials loop is
not closed:

tank size of the chromium bath: 100 x 70 x 120 cm (2040 litre)
one eco-rinse tank (see Section 4.7.4) in the static rinse before chromium plating
(concentration has to be controlled at CrO
3
>80 g/l by dilution because otherwise the
nickel under-layer is passivated and cannot be plated). This eco rinse is also used as the
first step after chromium plating
evaporation losses in the plating vat are replaced automatically with rinse water from
the static eco rinse (the plating vat losses only 1 l/hr, has a surface area of 0.45 m
2
and
runs at 43 C temperature. The bath has air extraction)
the static eco rinse is automatically refilled with deionised water with level control
after the static rinse, there is a double cascade rinse (countercurrent water flow) and all
the fresh water is firstly used as spray water by nozzles
further rinsing steps discharge the residual chromic acid to the waste water plant.

Efficiency

plated surface: 11000 m
2
/yr at an average thickness of 0.3 ]m chromium (typical for
decorative bright chromium)
plated chromium on the surface: 236 kg/yr
chromic acid consumption: 870 kg/yr = 452.4 kg/yr chromium input
metal efficiency approximately: 52 %.

Material paths of the chromium

plated on the parts
air extraction system (waste; the same amounts of wastes are collected each year)
chromium sludge in the bath (waste)
rack stripping (metal hydroxide, waste but sold for external metal recovery)
waste water plant (metal hydroxide >99 %, waste but sold for external metal recovery).

Bullet points 2, 3 and 4 together are at least 3 5 % of the input and can never be eliminated
totally even in a completely closed loop.

Conclusions

the metal efficiency of approximately 52 % is typical of this type of small hexavalent
chromium plating line
for small chromium plants without a concentrator closed loop cannot be reached
the thinner the plated chromium layer, the more difficult it is to reach a very good metal
efficiency
without the steps mentioned above moving towards closing the loop, the metal
efficiency for decorative hexavalent chromium plating is only 20 30 %.

Source
[Martin Peter, Collini GmbH, March 2005].
Annexes
520 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
8.7 Ion exchange general description of techniques

Description
Ion exchange has been used commercially for many years in water treatment and the surface
treatment industry. Its description therefore does not fall readily into any particular application,
and new applications and new resin systems continue to emerge. Examples are:

water deionisation
water softening applications.

and in the surface treatment industry for:

waste water treatment applications
rinse-water recovery
metals recovery. The most common applications include recovery of copper (from acid
copper solutions), nickel and precious metals from plating rinse-water.

Ion exchange is a chemical reaction where ions from solutions are exchanged for ions attached
to chemically active functional groups on ion exchange resins. Resins are typically classified as
cation exchange resins or anion exchange resins. Cation resins usually exchange sodium or
hydrogen ions for positively charged cations such as nickel, copper and sodium. Anion resins
typically exchange hydroxyl ions for negatively charged ions such as chromates, sulphates and
chlorides. Cation and anion exchange resins are both produced from three dimensional, organic
polymer networks. However, they have different ionisable functional group attachments that
provide different ion exchange properties. Ion exchange resins have varying ion-specific
selectivities (preferences for removal). The following chemical equilibrium equation describes a
cation exchange process:

zR - A + zB + aazR - B + zA+

R - = Resin functional group
A+ = Resin-bound cation
B+ = Water phase cation
z = Number of equivalents

Ion exchange systems typically consist of columns loaded with ion exchange resin beads.
Process solutions are pumped through the columns for treatment. Key features of ion exchange
column systems:

ions are removed in a continuous flow system
the ion exchange resins load in the direction of flow until the entire column is loaded
resins can be regenerated, whereby acidic solutions are typically used to remove metals
from cation exchange resins, and caustic solutions are typically used to remove resin-
bound salts. Rinse solutions are used to remove excess regeneration fluids from the
columns
the linear flow velocity through the resin bed impacts on the ion exchange rate.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 521
The major types of ion exchange resins include:

strong acid resins: a typical strong acid resin functional group is the sulphonic acid
group (SO
3
H). Strong acid resins are highly ionised cation exchangers. The exchange
capacity of strong acid resins is relatively constant over specific functional pH ranges
weak acid resins: a typical weak acid resin functional group is a carboxylic acid group
(COOH). Weak acid resins exhibit a much higher affinity for hydrogen ions than strong
acid resins, and can be regenerated using significantly lower quantities of regeneration
reagents. Dissociation of weak acid resins is strongly influenced by solution pH and has
limited capacity below a pH of approximately 6.0
strong base resins: a typical strong base resin functional group is the quaternary
ammonia group. Strong base resins are highly ionised anion exchangers. The exchange
capacity of these resins is relatively constant over specific functional pH ranges
weak base resins: these exhibit a much higher affinity for hydroxide ions than strong
base resins and can be regenerated using significantly lower quantities of regeneration
reagents. Dissociation of weak base resins is strongly influenced by solution pH; resin
capacity is influenced by pH and has limited capacity above a pH of approximately 7.0
chelating resins: these behave similarly to weak acid cation resins but exhibit a high
degree of selectivity for heavy metal cations. One common type of chelating resin is
iminodiacetate resin. This resin has two carboxylic acid functional groups attached to a
nitrogen atom that is attached to the resin polymeric structure. The carboxylic acid
groups exchange with different cations, similar to a weak acid resin. However, the
nitrogen atom can also form a ligand bond with metal cations, thereby adding another
cation capture mechanism. Chelating resins are particularly selective for heavier
divalent cations over monovalent or trivalent cations due to the presence of two
desirably spaced functional groups.

The following bullet points indicate relative ion-specific selectivity preferences for common
commercial ion exchange resin types. The ions on each list are ordered from highest to
lowest selectivity:

strong acid (cation) resin selectivity:
barium> lead> strontium> calcium> nickel> cadmium> copper> zinc> iron>
magnesium> manganese> alkali metals> hydrogen
strong base (anion) resin selectivity:
iodide> nitrate> bisulphite> chloride> cyanide> bicarbonate> hydroxide> fluoride>
sulphate
weak acid (cation) resin selectivity:
copper> lead> iron> zinc> nickel> cadmium> calcium>magnesium> strontium>
barium> alkalis.
chelating resin selectivity (iminodiacetate):
copper> mercury> lead> nickel> zinc> cadmium > cobalt> iron> manganese> calcium>
magnesium> strontium> barium> alkalis
chelating resin selectivity (aminophosphonic):
lead> copper> zinc> nickel> cadmium> cobalt >calcium> magnesium> strontium>
barium> alkalis

The exchange capacity of typical ion exchange resins can be expressed in milliequivalent per
litre (meq/l = ppm of ions/equivalent weight per litre). Table 8.46 presents typical
exchange capacities for common commercial ion
exchange resins.

Annexes
522 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Resin type Exchange capacity (meq/l)
Strong acid (cation) 1800
Weak acid (cation) 4000
Strong base (anion) 1400
Weak base (anion) 1600
Chelating (sodium form) 1000
Table 8.46: Typical ion exchange capacities for general resin types (in milliequivalents per litre, meq/l)
[162, USEPA, 2000]

Achieved environmental benefits
See Applicability, below.

Cross-media effects
Chemicals used in regeneration.
Impacts of waste solutions from regeneration.
Energy consumption used for pumping.

Operational data
Typical system components include:

ion exchange columns with resin
process pumps, piping and valves
regeneration tanks, pumps and piping
regeneration chemicals and chemical mix systems
pre-filters (to remove solids and organics)
process controls (for automated or semi-automated regeneration cycles).

Depending on the application, various combinations of anion, cation, and mixed-bed
(anion/cation) resins may be used.

Applicability
See Description, above, including use for water deionisation and water softening applications.
This to improve the incoming water quality to the installation or process line, and can improve
process solution quality by removing unwanted ions (and therefore improves product quality
and extends bath life) and for rinsing, to ensure workpieces dry without leaving blemishes of
dissolved solids.

Ion exchange is also an excellent technology for recovering plating chemicals from dilute rinse-
waters. In the typical configuration, rinse-water containing a dilute concentration of plating
chemicals is passed through an ion exchange column where metals are removed from the rinse-
water and held by the ion exchange resin. When the capacity of the unit is reached, the resin is
regenerated and the metals are concentrated into a manageable volume of solution. It is
important to note that in some cases less treatment capacity is required to recycle rinse waters
than to treat incoming water and treat the subsequent rinses, as the ion-loading or TDS may be
lower.

For conventional chemical recovery processes, systems are designed with either cation or anion
beds, depending on the charge of the ionic species being recovered. After passing through the
column, the treated rinse-water is discharged to the sewer or undergoes subsequent treatment. In
most cases, rinse-water is recycled to the process. Such systems include both cation and anion
columns to completely deionise the rinse-water.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 523
Drag-out recovery tanks can be combined with ion exchange to reduce the required capacity of
the ion exchange columns. Using this configuration, the drag-out tank(s) are followed by an
overflow rinse that feeds an ion exchange column. In operation, the drag-out tanks return the
bulk of the plating chemicals to the plating bath and an ion exchange column captures only the
residual chemical load. This reduces the ion exchange system size requirement.

Applicability - secondary stream(s)
Regenerating chemicals can be selected to optimise the products derived from the regeneration
of ion exchange resins. Chemicals are selected to produce salts that can be directly recovered in
the treatment process. Metals can be recovered via electrolysis and salts are recovered offsite.
Depending on the chemical product specification of the recovery process, the regenerated
solution can be returned directly to the plating tank for re-use, further processed, or the metals
recovered by another technology, such as electrolysis. The most common applications of this
technology are in the recovery of copper, nickel and precious metals. Countercurrent
regeneration mechanisms can result in significantly lower chemical use for regeneration as the
regenerated zone is always maintained in a clean condition. Co-current regeneration requires
higher chemical use and/or results in lower initial water quality as the regenerated zone is left
in a semi-contaminated state following regeneration.

Applicability - limitations
Common limitations for ion exchange:

ion exchange may become impractical for use with total dissolved solids concentrations
above 500 ppm, due to the need for frequent regeneration
resins have different effective pH ranges. For example, iminodiacetate chelating resin
works best in a slightly acidic range; selectivity is lower at higher pH and below a pH of
approximately 2.0
oxidants, solvents, organics, oil and grease can degrade resins
suspended solids can clog resin columns.

Economics
Situation specific. See Example plants, below.

Driving force for implementation
Situation specific.

Example plants
See specific applications and examples in the following sections:
4.4.5.1. Water supply, treatment and recycling/re-use
4.7.8.1 Regeneration by ion exchange
4.7.10 Multiple rinse techniques
4.7.12 Combining techniques and installation-wide approaches
4.10 Common techniques for treating waters and aqueous solutions: feed-water, rinses, waste
water treatment, process solutions, and materials recovery
4.11.7 Ion exchange purification of metallic contamination
4.12.2 Ion exchange recovery of precious metals from rinses
4.14.17.3 Continuous removal of iron and re-use of the zinc bath (large scale steel coil)
4.16 Waste water emission abatement techniques

Reference literature
[104, UBA, 2003, 162, USEPA, 2000]

Annexes
524 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
8.8 Ultrasonic cleaning example plants

Automatic plating line
The generators, which are located close to the vessel, supply the transducers with a high
frequency and high potency electrical signal (in this case 4000 W to 25 kHz because they are
tubular transducers). Inside the transducers, there is a piezoelectric effect which, when it
receives this signal, starts to vibrate and produces mechanical waves through the environment
surrounding it. The system requires a chemical degreasing bath, and accelerates cleaning by
improving removal of oils or other impurities from the parts.

Plant details
Volume 4950 litres
System of 15 tubular transducers with 4000 W of power (although the work power does not
exceed 1500 W)
Stainless steel AISI 316 vessel with a thermal-coated double wall
Temperature 70 C (65 C to 75 C)
Energy heating by a 25 mm diameter coil with water heated to 85 C. It has three auxiliary
resistances of 3000 W to supplement the heating.
Duration of bath (renewal) 2 weeks (operating for 16 hrs per day)
Cleaning time functioning of the ultrasounds from 0 to 3 minutes (depending on the type of
material stainless steel, iron or brass, and whether it is polished or not or contains large
amounts of oil)
Auxiliary equipment a filter pump with cartridges (8 m
2
) for the removal of insoluble particles
(13000 l/h)
Products alkaline grease remover with concentrations of 30 g/l (25 to 35 g/l).

Washing after polishing with an automatic machine
Volume 230 litres
System of two plate transducers with 1000 W of power.
Stainless steel AISI 316 vessel with a thermal-coated double wall
Temperature 70 C (65 C to 75 C)
Energy one 2000 W resistance for heating.
Duration of bath (renovation) - weekly (operating 8 hours per day)
Cleaning time permanent functioning of ultrasounds (they work only for cleaning polished
brass (large quantities of paste)
Caution initial degasification of the bath.
Products acidic grease remover with a concentration of 35 g/l.

Cross-media effects for both examples
Waste from the filter pump, including cartridges and those associated with water treatment
(sludge). Their quantity depends on production volume
Noise high frequency sound (25 kHz). If the ultrasounds start to function without parts, the
noise causes discomfort to the human ear, since the equipment vibrates and has high diffusion
because there is no insulation. In the case of normal operation, the noise is heard only close to
the working zone
Gaseous emissions a system for capturing vapours with a scrubber system is recommended (as
for hot alkali cleaners)
Waste water treated as a normal degreaser, i.e., neutralised with precipitation of the dissolved
metals as a sludge.

Control of parameters for both examples
There is initial degasification of the bath on first use as well as vibration in normal use. Careful
securing of the parts to the jigs is therefore required, as the vibration can cause them to fall off.
Weekly laboratory control of alkalinity/acidity of the bath.

Reference literature
[158, Portugal, 2004]
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 525
8.9 Example plant for the reduction of the volume of extracted
air

Description
The KCH ACTSEC technology is a system designed to provide an efficient removal of air
contaminants from the workplace at a reasonable cost and at a level that minimises the overall
power consumption and exhaust volume to the air pollution control device. This installation is
set up as one semi-automated process control system. The process is wash and etch of titanium
parts. The lids and exhaust are automated. All vented tanks are fitted with covers that open and
close as the hoist moves over the tank to load or unload parts for washing or etching. The line is
exhausted via its own exhaust system, comprised of a scrubber and fan. Each vented tank has
two lateral exhaust hoods, each with its own volume damper. The volume dampers are
interlocked with tank covers and open and close at the same time. This allows for an increase in
airflow through the hoods as required when the covers are in the open position. The exhaust
system has a bleed-in air control damper, located between the line hoods and the scrubber, that
opens and closes as required to compensate for the fluctuation in static pressure due to the
opening and closing of tank covers and hood dampers. This maintains a constant volume and
static pressure through the scrubber and fan. The system provides a constant volume with a
slight negative airflow in the room. Make-up air is brought in from the outside, tempered, and
distributed throughout the room.

Achieved environmental benefit
The measured flowrate of 514 m
3
/m is a reduction of 905 m
3
/m from the baseline design
flowrate of 1419 m
3
/m for a tank system without lids.

Total energy savings are 1108852 kWh/yr.

Cross-media effects
None apparent.

Operational data
Titanium wash and etch line:

15mlong; six process tanks 13 m
3
volume
4.3 mlong x 1.2m wide x 2.4m deep
one lid opening at a time
two tanks of 1.4 % nitric acid/0.14 % hydrofluoric acid
design airflow without lids: 1419 m
3
/minute.

Verification of performance
The technology was tested to verify if the statements made by the vendor as to the energy
savings from decreased power requirements were accurate.

Economics
A cost analysis of the technology was performed using current operating conditions. The
reduction in the size of the scrubber and the induced draft fan due to the lower ventilation
requirements with the lids in use results in a lower cost for equipment and power requirements.
The reduction in the size of the induced draft fan is significant. The facility anticipates a saving
of USD 65884 yearly, which is comprised of energy and O&M cost savings. Additionally, the
initial capital expenditure is significantly reduced due to component size reduction. A capital
cost saving of USD 61283 is anticipated.

Operation and maintenance labour
Operation and maintenance (O&M) labour requirements for the technology were not monitored
during testing. However, O&M information obtained from the facility indicated yearly O&M
costs were USD 8547.
Annexes
526 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Cost savings calculation
(Report work carried out 2000, report date 2002):

the system cost without the KCH ACTSEC USD 187272
the system cost with the KCH ACTSEC USD 125989
reduction in extraction equipment saves USD 61283

annual energy cost saving = USD 48790
annual O&M cost saving = USD 17094

annual energy cost savings + O&M cost savings = total annual savings
USD 48790 + 17094 = USD 65884 Total annual savings.

Driving force for implementation
Air extraction system is required to meet environmental and occupational health requirements.
Costs savings for this system.

Summary
The test results show that the KCH ACTSEC technology, when placed on a tank system with
ventilation and heating requirements, results in a smaller load demand for power and a reduced
need for ventilation to meet ACGIH standards. Consequently, a smaller scrubber, scrubber
pump motor, and induced draft fan are needed when the KCH ACTSEC technology is used.
This translates into not only a reduced power demand, but also a lower equipment cost. The cost
of the power consumed by the lid motors is small compared to the overall savings when the lids
are used. Furthermore, the reduction in energy used by a facility using the KCH ACTSEC
technology results in a corresponding reduction in atmospheric pollutant emissions from any
fossil fuel power plant supplying the energy.

Reference
http://www.epa.gov/etv/pdfs/vrvs/KCH_Final_Report.pdf
[167, USEPA, 2002]

Example plant
Goodrich Aerospace Landing Gear Division, Tullahoma, Tennessee.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 527
8.10 Table of comments on the use of hexavalent and trivalent chromium
Advantages of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) plating
Advantage Comment
Can build thick layers necessary in hard chrome applications
Current commercial options to hard chromiumare listed in a paper from NEWMOA (see
[108, NEWMOA, 2003]). In some cases there are no alternatives to Cr(VI) electroplating
High hardness 700 to 1000 HV (harder than from Cr(III)), corrosion-resistant, micro-cracked and
retains lubricants, low friction resistant, anti-adhesive, machinable, thermally resistant
Untrue: coatings from Cr(III) achieve similar hardness values. May be affected by thickness
of coating.
Other attributes from Cr(III) are similar to Cr(VI) (see below)
Widely used, well established, easily applied and low cost
Cr(VI) Decorative coating: 650 sites in Germany, turnover EUR 21000 million/yr
Cr(VI) Hard chromium: 285 sites in Germany, turnover EUR 840 million/yr
Glossy coatings are generally deposited from Cr(VI) solutions Glossy coatings are also obtained from Cr(III) solutions
Surface treatment specifications for key applications (e.g. automotive) specify Cr(VI)
Advantages of trivalent chromium(Cr(III)) plating (both chloride and sulphate based)
Advantage Comment
Lower toxicity
No additional health and safety requirements
Will not trigger Seveso Directive limits
Higher cathode efficiency
No hydrogen formed and less spray
Energy saving is significant (see case studies and example plants, Section 4.9.8.3) and
exceeds increased chemical costs,
giving good payback time for change-over and increased profits.
Better covering and throwing power. Achieves higher racking densities and therefore higher parts
throughput per shift
Increased profitability reported in case studies
Lower current density. This requires lighter weight and less expensive jigging. Increased profitability reported in case studies
Process insensitive to current interruption (hence no whitewashing) and almost impossible to
burn. Reject rates down (by 66 %reported)
Increased profitability reported in case studies
Widely established in the US, and at least 100 sites worldwide
Used by two major cooker manufacturers in Europe for 7 years, for parts subject to heat, humidity
and cleaning with strong acid or caustic cleaners and abrasive materials
Lower chromium content of solutions results in lower viscosity, resulting in lower drag-over, less
effluent contamination, and less staining of work
Less waste produced than Cr(VI) process: up to 80 %reported. Also, no dissolution of anodes to
lead chromate sludge
Overall net profit up due to reduced effluent treatment, reduced waste and waste charges, fewer
rejects, reduced air monitoring, increased throughput. Lower insurance premiums are possible for
Cr(III) operators because of lower worker risk
Solutions are less concentrated, not oxidising and are cleaner and less corrosive to handle, use and
are less corrosive to plant and equipment
Cr(III) plating solutions can be regenerated by porous pot or membrane filtration
Annexes
528 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Disadvantages of hexavalent chromium(Cr(VI)) plating
Disadvantage Comment Counter-comment
Very toxic to humans and the environment.
Current/proposed classifications:
Na
2
Cr
2
O
7
very toxic/very toxic
Na
2
CrO
4
toxic/very toxic
CrO
3
toxic/very toxic
All: very toxic to aquatic organisms (R50/53)
Very toxic (human health) triggers Seveso II Directive
threshold of five tonnes per installation
Control measures well understood and can be readily applied: including
spray suppression, fume extraction, reduction of Cr(VI) readily in effluent
treatment with flocculation and precipitation. Can be used in closed loop
with countercurrent rinsing, evaporation, etc. May be used in specialised,
enclosed production lines for high volume production of similar sized
components
Measures for control, such as fume
extraction, give rise to other
environmental impacts
One key measure involves the use of
PFOS in vats to reduce chromium spray
formation: PFOS has toxic and
bioaccumulative effects, and is now under
investigation (see Section 8.2). Largest
manufacturer ceased production 2002
Insurance premiums for health and safety
may be higher as a result of occupational
health issues
Low cathode efficiency, poor metal distribution with
excessive build up in high current areas and poor coverage in
low current areas, lack of coverage around holes, sensitivity
to ripples in power supply and 'white washing'
(opaque/cloudy finish: a common problem). High reject rates.
High energy costs.
Auxiliary anodes can be used to improve throw
Poor current efficiency due to 85 90 %electrical power
generates hydrogen, causing bubbles which break forming a
Cr(VI) mist.
See control measures (see first row of this table, above)
Drag-in and etching (sometimes in the chrome vats) in the
strong acid electrolyte increase impurities such as Fe, Cu, Ni,
and Cr(III) (this is also generated in the process). These must
be removed by chemical precipitation, plating out, ion
exchange resin columns, or membrane electrolysis or
electrodialysis. Normally ion exchange is on the first static
rinse to prevent degradation of the resin. This is essential
High chemical concentration in the vats: typically 180 450
g/l
Concentration up to ten times higher than Cr(III) baths. This increases
viscosity and with high concentration gives high Cr(VI) drag-out
High waste production from high solution strengths (where
there are discharges from rinsing)
Typically uses lead anodes, which decompose over time,
forming lead chromates (toxic) which slough off the anodes
and accumulate in the tank, requiring filtering and removal
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_Final_Draft Version May 2005 529
Cr(VI) is an strong oxidant and attacks equipment used in its
control, such as plastic air ductings etc, causing corrosion in
the working atmosphere and deterioration of plant and
equipment
Dried Cr(VI) electrolytes have been known to cause fires in
plating shops
Cr(VI) plating solutions require specialist regeneration or
discarding for recovery of the metal in the waste solution
Disadvantages of trivalent chromium(Cr(III)) plating (both chloride and sulphate based)
Disadvantage Comment Counter-comment
Solution reactions limit thickness, and hence cannot be built
up to the requirement for hard chromium applications
Cr(III) solutions cannot currently achieve thick films. A patented process to
overcome this is at preproduction trials. For information, see Emerging
Techniques, Section 6.2
Corrosion stability, hardness and wear resistance is lower
than Cr(VI)
Reported measured hardness figures are similar to Cr(VI) solutions. At
present, it is not possible to build thick coatings for engineering applications.
Corrosion may be due to porosity of the coating or lack of passivation effect
(see rows below). Where high corrosion resistance is not required (e.g.
indoor applications) the Cr(III) coating will outlast the life of the parts.
Cr(III) has been used extensively for about seven years by major companies
making cookers, where parts are subject to heat, humidity, abrasive and
strongly acid or alkali cleaning agents and abrasive cleaning materials, with
no reported problems
Cr(III) solution does not passivate in areas where it does not
plate. This can lead to corrosion on parts with significant
blind areas, such as tubes
Parts with blind areas should be rinsed rapidly and passivated subsequently
with a Cr(VI), phosphate or organic passivating solution
Dissolution of substrate dissolved from blind areas (Cu, Zn
from brass) can give rise to an increase in the contaminants
and other dragged-in contaminants (Ni from a previous
plating stage) can affect the colour of the plating, causing
darkening and can decrease current efficiency
It is essential to control this by maintenance using ion exchange or
precipitating agents followed by filtration. Filtration with activated carbon is
essential to remove organic breakdown products
Colour is different to Cr(VI) decorative coatings.
Colour for Cr(III) chloride reported as dark grey/bright or
yellow/bright and for Cr(III) sulphate as white/bright
compared with Cr(VI) blue/bright
1. Colour is affected by contamination build up (see row above)
2. Differences in colour can be matched by the addition of iron (or other
additives). The co-deposition with iron and some other ions improve plating
properties. If colour match is critical, then parts may have to be produced by
the same processes
Cr(III) requires expensive membrane electrodes that are
susceptible to damage and poisoning
Membrane electrodes can be used, but are now largely replaced with cheaper
and more robust graphite or composite anodes. Organic additives prevent
oxidation of Cr(III) at the anode. Shielded lead anodes and insoluble
catalytic anodes maintained at an electrode potential level that prevents
oxidation of the Cr(III)
Annexes
530 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Cr(III) solutions contain complexing agents that interfere
with other waste water treatment
This may be possible hypothetically, but no problems have been observed or
reported. In one case study the operator of Cr(III) with electrolytic recovery
of the Cr achieves metals levels low enough to avoid further effluent
treatment
Cr(III) solutions contain chloride and release chlorine.
The oxidation of other materials by chlorine can lead to the
production of AOX in effluents.
The release of chlorine produces lots of small bubbles in the
solution and are a source of pitting in the plating
This problem only existed for chloride based solutions, and not sulphate
solutions. It was resolved 20 years ago by additions which prevent chlorine
release. The choice of additives and the usual regular maintenance by
activated carbon filtration will prevent release of AOX. No problems have
been observed at site visits or reported from case studies or operators
No pitting problems are reported by case studies or site visits, which report
better quality output from Cr(III) as a key advantage. A large number of
hydrogen bubbles are also produced in Cr(VI) solutions
Cr(III) solutions require more control and costly equipment to
maintain solutions
The additional controls are no greater than those required to run the nickel
solutions that precede the Cr step in decorative plating
The additional equipment (ion exchange, activated carbon filtering) is
similar to that required for closeed loop Cr(VI)
More complex solution chemistry requires more chemicals.
More costly to run
True but case studies report significant overall savings as a key reason for
change. See overall profit, in Advantages table, above.
Cr(III) cannot be run on a closed loop because it is based on a
ligand exchange reaction which cannot be revoked by heating
or other processes
Make up of Cr(III) solutions may be more than is normally
lost through evaporation and drag-out. Evaporation of the
bulk bath is one method of returning to the original volume
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 531
8.11 Example of plant optimisation calculations

This example plant is an automatic barrel line carrying out zinc plating and passivation. The
software also has a simulation of a jig (rack) plant. In the software, clicking on a specific
process tank links directly to the appropriate page (shown in the following pages).

Figure 8.22: UK industry average plant schematic

Note: UK Benchmark here means average type of plant before improvements are made. It
does not mean benchmark associated with BAT.

Figure 8.23: Industry optimised good practice plant, SE2000
Note: This plant employs some in-process techniques mentioned in Chapters 4 and 5
Annexes
532 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Figure 8.24: Summary of improvements made from average (benchmark) plant to good practice

The page summarises all the calculations and results shown in the following example pages. For
a barrel automatic plant operating 24 hours a day, 5 days a week, 48 weeks a year and the
following characteristics:

alkali zinc plate and chromium passivation
increasing rinsing after alkali cleaning from two to four counterflow rinses
changing acid pickling from one batch tank to three stage counterflow cascade
increasing rinsing after alkali cleaning from two to three counterflow rinses
adding an eco rinse tank
increasing rinsing after plating from two to five counterflow rinses
increasing rinsing after plating from two to three counterflow rinses.

The water, energy and chemical costs were set for average costs in year 2000.

With an interest rate of 10 % and inflation at 0 %, the payback time for the modifications are:

cost of plant modifications: GBP 23300 with a payback time of 0.6 years
if an estimated cost of infrastructure modifications of GBP 50000 is entered into the
programme, then the payback period becomes 1.8 years.

All the costs can be varied to be appropriate to any site, such as operating periods, size of plants,
inflation, interest rate values, costs of water, electricity, heating, chemicals, etc.

This is page is used to vary key standard data for the whole plant.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 533
These figures are used throughout
the application
16.0 hours 16 hours
5 days 5 days
48 weeks 48 weeks
80 % 80 %
Effective operating hours per year 3 072 h/year h/year
0.70 /m 0.70 /m
0.40 /m 0.40 /m
1100 mm
900 mm
1800 mm
900 mm
1300
0 % 0 %
10 % 10 %
0.040 /kWh 0.040 /kWh
0.010 /kWh 0.010 /kWh
Cost of electricty
Cost of hot water heating
Inflation since January 2000
760, 1300 or 1200 mm
1500, 1300 or 1100
Normal Value User set value
STANDARDS
Interest rate
Tank length (along plating line)
Tank width
Tank height
Capital cost per tank incl. inflation
Cost of water IN
Cost of trade effluent discharge
Barrel nominal size
Operating hours per day
Operating days per week
Operating weeks per year
Availability
Figure 8.25: Page showing where standard factors are entered for calculation

This page allows the drag-out rate to be varied according to specific plant conditions, or the
default values can be used.

These figures are used throughout
the application
2.0 litre/barrel 1.5 litre*
10 per hour 10 per hour
20.00 litre/ hour
* Typical figure for a 1100 mm size barrel, as currently selected
Normal Value User set value
STANDARDS
Drag-out rate
Drag-out per barrel
Plant output, barrels per hour
Figure 8.26: Page setting drag-out rates

Annexes
534 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
This page allows data to be set for a specific plant for alkaline cleaning, and a comparison
against the modified plant to show costs for changes to this process and the payback period.

*rates and costs can be modified on the "Standards" or "Drag Out" pages
years 0.4 % 10 Payback period, at interest rate*
1 950 Capital cost of additional tank(s)*
/yr 5 551 Annual savings
/yr 3 621 /yr 9 172 Total annual running costs
/yr 79 /yr 1 014 Cost of trade effluent discharge*
/yr 651 /yr 1 247 Cost of effluent treatment
/yr 2 603 /yr 4 988
Cost of cleaning agent dragged out
/yr 288 /yr 1 923
Cost of water IN*
litre/h 64.4
litre/h
825.1 Rinse flow to waste
litre/h 133.7
litre/h
894.4 Actual rinse flow
litre/h 133.7
litre/h
894.4 Minimum rinse flow req'd
2 000 2 000 Rinse ratio required (min)
1.10
4 2 No of rinse tanks
litre/h 69.3
litre/h
69.3 = make-up water req'd
litre/h 20.0
litre/h
20.0 + drag out*
litre/h 49.3 litre/h 49.3 evaporation loss
deg C
80 deg C 80 Soak tank temperature, deg C
g/litre
80 g/litre 80 Cleaning agent conc. in tank
/kg /kg 1.10 Cleaning agent price
MODIFIED PLANT OWN PLANT
ALKALINE CLEANING
STATION
(user inserts own data and options)
(other values, automatically calculated)
Figure 8.27: Alkaline cleaning station

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 535
This page allows data to be set for a specific plant for pickling, and a comparison against the
modified plant to show costs for changes to this process and the payback period.

*rates and costs can be modified on the "Standards" or "Drag-Out" pages
years 0.0 Payback period
% 10 Interest rate*
500 Capital cost of modification
/year 13 530 Annual savings
/year 1 621 Operating time saved by eliminating batch acid changes (3h)
/year 2 766 Acid cost savings
/year 9 143 Cost savings due to improved pickling
/year 817 /year 9 960 Value of poor pickling rejects
% 2.0 % 20 Proportion due to poor pickling
% 2.5 % 3.0 Reject rate, %
/year 1 660 000 /year 1 660 000 Plant turnover
/year 5 534 /year 8 300 Acid cost per year
3 tanks in cascade 3 tanks, batch Tank arrangement
MODIFIED PLANT OWN PLANT PICKLE
(user inserts own data and options)
Figure 8.28: Pickling station

Annexes
536 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
This page allows data to be set for a specific plant for post-pickle rinsing, and a comparison
against the modified plant to show costs for changes to this process and the payback period. The
rinse ratio required can be set.

*rates and costs can be modified on the "Standards" or "Drag-Out" pages
years 0.6 % 10 Payback period, at interest rate*
1 300 Capital cost of additional tank(s)*
/yr 2 170 Annual savings
/yr 852 /yr 3 022 Total annual running costs
/yr 310 /yr 1 099 Cost of trade effluent discharge*
/yr 542 /yr 1 923 Cost of water IN*
litre/h 252.0 litre/h 894.4 Water consumption*
2 000 2 000 Rinse ratio required (minimum)
3 2 No of rinse tanks
litre/h 20.0 litre/h 20.0
Acid drag out rate*
h/year 3 072 h/year 3 072 Operating hours per year*
MODIFIED PLANT OWN PLANT RINSE 2 - AFTER PICKLE
(user inserts own data and options)
Figure 8.29: Post-pickle rinsing; comparison of operation and costs for average and good practice plants
and payback period.

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 537
This page allows data to be set for a specific plant for elctrocleaning, and a comparison against
the modified plant to show costs for changes to this process and the payback period. The rinse
ratio required can be set.

*rates and costs can be modified on the "Standards" or "Drag-out" pages
years 1.5 % 10 Payback period, at interest rate*
1 300 Capital cost of additional tank(s)*
/yr 984 Annual savings
/yr 5 933 /yr 6 917 Total annual running costs
/yr 134 /yr 279 Cost of trade effluent discharge*
/yr 1 102 /yr 1 219 Cost of effluent treatment
/yr 4 409 /yr 4 877 Cost of cleaning agent dragged out
/yr 288 /yr 542 Cost of water IN*
litre/h 109.1
litre/h
227.3 Rinse flow to waste
litre/h 133.7 litre/h 252.0 Actual rinse flow
litre/h 133.7 litre/h 252.0 Minimum rinse flow req'd
2 000 2 000 Rinse ratio required (minimum)
4 3 No of rinse tanks
litre/h 24.7 litre/h 24.7 evaporation loss
deg C 80 deg C 80 Soak tank temperature, deg C
g/litre 80 g/litre 80 Cleaning agent conc. in tank
/kg 1.10 /kg 1.10 Cleaning agent price
MODIFIED PLANT
OWN PLANT ELECTROCLEANING STATION
(user inserts own data and options)
Figure 8.30: Electrocleaning station

Annexes
538 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
This page allows data to be set for a specific plant for elctroplating, and a comparison against
the modified plant to show costs for changes to this process and the payback period. The rinse
ratio required can be set.

*Rates can be changed: see Standards sheet
years 1.3 Payback period
% 10 Interest rate*
16 950 Capital cost of extra tank(s) & evaporator
pa 14 579 Annual savings
pa 1 565 pa 16 144 Total running costs
pa 1 352 pa 1 769 chiller/evaporator operation
0 pa 354 trade effluent discharge
pa 0 pa 2 680 effluent treatment
pa 213 pa 620 water IN
pa 0 pa 10 721 Running costs: chemicals
0.0 litre/h 288.4 Effluent flow
litre/h 99.2 Evaporator rating
litre/h 99.2 litre/h 288.4 Rinse flow required
3 000
3 000 Rinse ratio required [minimum]
5 3
No of rinse stages
Yes No
Whether evaporator installed.........
MODIFIED PLANT OWN PLANT
PLATE
litre/h
Figure 8.31: Plating station and rinses
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 539
This page calculates requirements for chillers, and specific data can be entered. The software
automatically calculates costs and also calculates the cost of the option to use an evaporator to
balance the rinse return.

33 HW heating required
kW - 33 Balance to be supplied by hot water coils
kW - 36 Natural heat losses (see above)
kW 72 Heat gain from plating (see above)
kW - 69 Heat loss through evaporation
kW/litre/h 0.7 Evaporation characteristic
litre/h 99 Evaporator design rate
Plating Tanks Heat Balance - Evaporator Option
9 830 (annual cost of plating current:
/yr 1 769 Annual running costs*:
14 Ancilliary equipment power
% 40 Chiller coefficient
kW 36
Balance to be removed by chiller
kW - 36
% of plating 50 Natural heat losses
kW 72
Heat from plating operation
%
80
Utilisation factor
5 No of plating stages
A/stage
1 500 Plating current per stage
Vdc
12
Plating voltage
(calculated by spreadsheet)
Heat Balance Plating Tanks Heat Balance - Chiller Option
kW
kW
(user inserts own data)
/yr
Figure 8.32: Chiller requirements of plating station

Annexes
540 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Again, this allows the number of rinses and rinse ratio for a specific plant to be entered and
compared with an optimised plant.

*rates and costs can be modified on the "Standards" or "Drag-out pages
years 0.4 % 10 Payback period, at interest rate*
1 300 Capital cost of additional tank(s)*
3 624 Annual savings
1 155 /yr 4 779 Total annual running costs
420 /yr 1 738 Cost of trade effluent discharge*
735 /yr 3 041 Cost of water IN*
litre/h 342.0 litre/h 1414.2 Water consumption*
5 000 5 000 Rinse ratio required (minimum)
3 2
No of rinse tanks
litre/h 20.0 litre/h 20.0 Acid drag out rate*
h/year 3 072 h/year 3 072 Operating hours per year*
MODIFIED PLANT OWN PLANT
RINSE 4 - AFTER PASSIVATE
(user inserts own data and options)
Figure 8.33: After passivation rinsing

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 541
8.12 Example calculation of the cost benefit of reducting NO
X
emissions from aluminium brightening

Description
Example facility with automatic/semi-automatic brightening of aluminium prior to anodising.
Processing line is alkaline soak clean/degrease; brightener; hot smut removal; anodising, with
rinses between:

brightening solution 6 7 % of 70 % nitric acid (as supplied)
15 % sulphuric acid (supplied as 96 %)
78 79 % phosphoric acid (supplied as 50 %).

Air is extracted at 30000 m
3
/h through a scrubber. Most NO
2
is absorbed, leaving mainly NO
which is more difficult.

Achieved environmental benefits
Typical industry figures for NO
X
emitted after scrubbing 60 70 mg/m
3
Provisional Environment Agency for England and Wales draft guidance (2001) sets benchmark
value for NO
X
of 20 mg/m
3
. To decrease emission to proposed benchmark requires reduction of
50 mg/m
3
.
30000 m
3
x 50 mg = 1500 g per hour.

For an operation running 24 hours a day, 360 day a year (assuming shift working or need to
keep SCR running while tanks are hot):
= 12960 kg/yr x 13 tonnes NO
X
/yr

For an operation running 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, 48 weeks:
= 12 kg/d = 60 kg/wk = 2880 kg/yr x approximately 3 tonnes NO
X
/yr.

Cross-media effects
Power consumption.
Materials and chemicals used in process, especially catalysts.

Operational data
See above.

Economics and applicability
Scale factor (from the first draft reference document on BAT on Economics and Cross-media
effects) i.e. scaling the cost from an actual plant using the technique:

Cy = Cx (y/x)
e
Where Cy = cost of plant y
Cx = cost of plant x
y = scale of plate y (size or throughput)
x = scale of plant x (size or throughput)
e = rough approximation factor, 0.6 being taken as roughly correct when using
throughput as the scaling parameter

Annexes
542 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
In this case:

Cy = Cx(30000/110000)
0.6
Cx(0.273)
0.6
= EUR 459000 ~ EUR 500000

Nitric acid plant Aluminium
Brightening
Investment excluding catalyst 925000 500000 750000
Cost per year over 15 years 95400 51500 76500
Maintenance and wear (2 % of capital) 18500 10000 14250
Additional energy 3710 1830 2720
SCR cost per year 8300 3000? 5000?
Liquid ammonia 35000 2000? 3000?
Total annual running costs 65510 14800 20970
Annual total costs (sic)164400 78130 114440
Cost per tonne NO
X
abated 593 5275 to
22783
7805 to
33823
Shadow cost of NO
X
per tonne 1500 to 7100
EU-15 average 4200
Note: ? = guestimate in lieu of real data
Table 8.47: Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO
X
: Cost in EUR (2001)
Data from [24, UBA-Austria, 2001]

Economic viability
Gross profit in 1996 in EU manufacturing: ~9 %, now <5 % and will be for 2 4 years.

SME turnover EUR 7 million, gross profit at 5 % = EUR 350000
But most SMEs in this sector have a turnover of about EUR 1.5 million, with a capitalisation
per company of about EUR 1.5 million, and a gross profit at 5 % = EUR 75000.

Conclusions for this example
For over 90 % of the industry as SMEs, even at the top end of SME size and profitability, the
cost of installation is disproportionate. For most SMEs the cost is not sustainable.

The cost of abatement per tonne of NO
X
is at best 1.2 times the EU shadow cost of NO
X
, as an
average 5 times, and at worst is 8 times the EU shadow cost of NO
X
.
Driving force for implementation
Large NO
X
emissions.
Local environmental air quality issues.

References
[29, EA, 2001-3] [24, UBA-Austria, 2001] [88, EIPPCB, ].
Data on brightening aluminium, personal communications, David Hemsley, CETS.
File note calculation of NO
X
emissions from aluminium brightening [153, Tempany, 2003].
Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 543
8.13 Waste water minimisation and waste water-free
electroplating in Germany

Water is an indispensable raw material for industrial production. In Germany as in many other
countries, fresh water and the purification and discharge of waste water are a substantial cost
factor for many branches. Cost reduction was the main reason that water saving techniques were
introduced to almost all industries in Germany.

The total cost for the use of water in industry are made up of the following costs:

purchase of fresh water
treatment of fresh water, if necessary
cleaning of waste water
waste water discharge fee
control (sampling, monitoring)
disposal of the waste generated in waste water purification.

The factors affecting water costs differ strongly, depending on type of use, regional water
supply and legal standards. In Germany the total costs for the industrial use of water can be as
high as EUR 50/m
3
. Waste water treatment is usually the largest cost factor. The cost of waste
water treatment is determined on one hand by the nature and quantity of the pollutants and on
the other hand by differentiated administrative rules depending on the quality of the waste
water. The requirements for the discharge of waste water to drain have been standardised within
the European Union and international standards can be seen in Annex 8.3.

Basis of waste water free technology
An important prerequisite for the introduction of waste water free technology is the installation
of a purification unit in order to regain the waters original quality. The costs for such a
purification stage are usually high, but on the other hand the costs for conventional water use
are not incurred. In order to evaluate whether the closing of the water cycle is economically
favourable or not, the following conditions must be considered:

total amount of waste water
requirements on the quality of the recirculated water
nature and quantity of the pollutants
losses from the cycle by discharge and evaporation.

In practice, there are different types of waste water pollutants, some are easy to remove while
others are difficult to remove.

Pollutants that are easy to remove:

biodegradable organic compounds
metal ions which can be precipitated
solids easy to filtrate
inorganic compounds which can easily be destroyed (cyanide, nitrate, ammonia).

Pollutants that are difficult to remove:

salts
fine dispersions of solids (colloids)
stable organic and inorganic compounds.

Annexes
544 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
All these variables must be considered when calculating the cost of production without
producing waste water. The decision as to whether or not a process without waste water should
be introduced is dominated by the cost benefits, where:

the purchase of fresh water, waste water purification, the waste water discharge fee, and
controls.

is larger than

the costs for the water recirculation system.

Particularly in Europe, the operation of systems without waste water in plating shops is
economically viable only under specific conditions, as shown by the examples, below.

Waste water contains substances, in particular salts, which are difficult to remove from the
waste water; the only available technique is an evaporation process. Since the evaporation of
water is an expensive process, this technology is used only in exceptional cases.

For all examples presented in the following, it must be taken into consideration that they reflect
German conditions. The costs of fresh water, waste water discharge and environmental
regulations are substantial:

fresh water EUR 1 2/m
3
discharge of waste water EUR 2 4/m
3
waste disposal EUR 100 200/t
controls (sampling and analyses) EUR 5000 10000/yr.

Regulations (e.g. German Waste Water Ordinance, IPPC Directive)

require an economical use of water
compliance with the limit values for the discharge of waste water.

Technical solutions which are economically viable in Germany may not necessarily be so under
different conditions in other countries.

Conventional waste water minimised technology
Due to the high costs for fresh water and waste water (EUR 3 8/m
3
), and legal standards
requiring an economical use of water, water consumption in the German plating industry has
dropped dramatically over the last 10 years. Large plating shops, for instance, have reduced
their total waste water emission from 30000 50000 m
3
/yr to a few 1000 m
3
/yr.

Plant A
In the first design phase of this plant, thought was given to implementing a waste water free
production process. Although it is possible to run individual process stages almost without
generating any waste water, it became evident in the course of the planning process that the
construction of a completely waste water free production plant would not be compatible with
the requirement of an energetically optimised process, especially if no excess heat from other
production processes can be used. The calculations also proved that the waste water free
alternative would be too expensive compared to a waste water minimised technique. In
consequence, the concept was changed to minimise the generation of waste water. The new
plant with a plating capacity of 400000 m
2
/yr only produces 1215 m
3
of waste water per year
(that means a specific rinse-water consumption of 3 l/m
2
).

Annexes
PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL September 2005 545
The basic condition for a water-saving technology was the installation of an optimal rinsing
system. Wherever technically possible, three step rinses were installed. The rinse-water from the
passivating line is purified by ion exchangers and fed back to the rinse. The only waste water
from the passivating line comes from the regeneration of the ion exchangers. The rinse-water
from the plating process is concentrated by an evaporator unit and completely returned to the
process, while the distillate is used again for rinsing. The layout of the complex and expensive
waste water treatment unit necessary to meet the strict German standards can be kept
substantially smaller, which compensates the additional costs of the water saving technology.

Waste water free process stages
As mentioned earlier, operation of an entire plant free of waste water is generally not acceptable
from a financial standpoint. Under certain circumstances, however, it can be favourable to
operate certain process stages without producing waste water. This requires the waste water
from process stages to be collect and treated separately.

Plant B
Plant B was a project, supported by the German Environment Ministry, to retrofit a 15 year old
chromium plating plant with waste and waste water -free technology. The old plant was
equipped with a standard three-step rinse, and electrical cooling systems were used to eliminate
the process heat. Of the 60 tonnes of chromic acid used yearly in this plant, about 23 tonnes
ended up in waste water, resulting in about 500 tonnes of electroplating sludge.

The concept of the new plant is based on using the evaporation heat to accomplish the necessary
cooling of the electrolyte. For this purpose the water of the first static rinse is fed to a vaporiser,
which also serves to demist the exhaust air from the process bath. The vaporisation of the water
causes the diluted electrolyte to be cooled and concentrated so that it can be returned to the
process bath. The rinsing technique for the process, a five-stage combined dip and spray rinsing
system, is so designed that the required amount of rinse-water is exactly the same as the amount
vaporised. This means that the electrolyte cycle and the water cycle are closed and no waste and
no waste water are generated by the plant during normal operation.

The electrolytes are regenerated by electrodialysis. Here the reduced trivalent chromium is re-
oxidised to hexavalent chromium, and cations such as iron, copper and zinc, which adversely
affect the chromium plating process, are removed selectively. The electroplating process itself is
waste water free. Small amounts of waste water arise in cleaning operations and in the
regeneration of the electrolytes. The amount of waste generated in the treatment of waste water
from these sources comes to only 7 t/yr, as opposed to more than 500 t generated yearly before
the plant was retrofitted.

The waste water free technology has substantial economic advantages over the conventional
technology, as the following numbers demonstrate. The complete return of dragged out process
solution to the process tank eliminates the costs of the purchase of 23 t of chromic acid per year,
and along with this, chemical costs for the treatment of waste water containing chromate at a
value of EUR 25000/yr as well as costs for the disposal of electroplating sludge (500 t/yr) to the
tune of EUR 75000/yr. The waste water free technology resulted in water cost savings of
approximately EUR 300000/yr. The savings in operating costs led the investment paying for
itself within one year.

Waste water free production plant
As described above and in Section 4.7.11, it can be economical to run individual stages of an
electroplating plant waste water free. In order to operate an entire waste water-free plant under
economically viable conditions, several conditions have to be met, as shown in the example
plant, below.

Annexes
546 September 2005 PT/EIPPCB/STM_BREF_FINAL
Plant C
The plant is an in-house plating shop with only a few process stages and a uniform spectrum of
workpieces (screws and nuts). Surplus heat is available from the in-house hardening plant. The
plant is situated in a drinking water catchment area. In Germany, plants which use water-
polluting materials are not normally permitted to operate in such areas. The task, therefore, was
to build an economically viable plant which generated no waste water whatsoever. The key to
the economically viable introduction of this technology is mainly an economical use of water.
For this reason specific attention was paid to the rinsing stages and the recycling of dragged-out
liquids.

Water saving rinsing:

all process stages were fitted with multistage (minimum of three stages) water saving
cascade rinses
at the zinc plating bath a six-stage rinse was installed, which was designed as a compact
rinse
installation of ion exchangers after the flow rinses.

Feedback of drag-out:

direct return of the rinse-water at all hot working stages
concentration of the rinse-water from the zinc plating unit by a vacuum evaporator and
return of the concentrates to the process tank.

Due to these measures, water consumption could be reduced to approximately 1200 m
3
per year,
corresponding to 1300 l/h. This required evaporating 200 - 300 l/h during operation, leaving a
waste water volume of approximately 1000 l/h. The waste water is neutralised with caustic soda
solution, precipitating the major part of the heavy metals as hydroxide which can then be
removed using a filter press. The neutralised waste water is concentrated in a low energy
evaporator with vapour compression. The concentrate is dried and sent to an underground
deposit facility.

The economic aspects of this plant are:

Investment costs
The additional investment costs of EUR 500000 are mainly for the evaporator and the drier.
Savings of approximately EUR 100000 arise because the waste water pretreatment plant is
smaller and of a simpler design than the conventional treatment plant.

Operating costs
The advantage of waste water free technology also lies in operating costs. Energy costs are
kept low since surplus energy from the in-house hardening unit is used for the operation of
the vaporiser and the drier. Savings of EUR 120000 are obtained by the considerably lower
water consumption, no fees for waste water discharge, lower costs for waste water treatment
chemicals and considerably lower waste disposal costs. The additional investment for the
implementation of the waste water-free system will pay for itself within four years.

Reference literature
Economical and ecological aspects of water minimisation in electroplating shops and waste
water-free electroplating have been evaluated in the two BMBF Joint Projects: Conversion of
plating shops to a material loss minimised process technology under simultaneous cost
reduction (FKZ 01RK9730/0; http://www.10galvaniken.de/) and Closing materials circuits in
the field of material removing wet processes (FKZ 01ZH941B/1).