Role of The Gut Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammatory Disease
Role of The Gut Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammatory Disease
Role of The Gut Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammatory Disease
macrophage
CD11b
+
CD11c
macrophage
Clostridium cluster IV
and XIVa strains
PSA
+
Bacteroides fragilis
Other microbiota
B cell
IgA
+
plasma cell
IgA
+
B cell
FDC
c
TGF
Pattern recognition
receptors
(PRRs). Germline-encoded
receptors (such as the Toll-like
receptors (TLRs) and the
NOD-like receptors (NLRs))
that can sense pathogen-
associated molecular patterns
and initiate signalling
cascades that lead to an
innate immune response.
They can be membrane-bound
(such as TLRs and C-type lectin
receptors (CLRs)) or soluble
cytoplasmic receptors (such as
retinoic acid-inducible gene I
(RIG-I), melanoma differentiation-
associated protein 5 (MDA5)
and NLRs).
Peripherally derived T
Reg
cells
A subset of forkhead box P3
(FOXP3)
+
regulatory T (T
Reg
)
cells that are induced in the
periphery and mediate their
suppressive effects through
the secretion of cytokines
such as interleukin-10 and
transforming growth factor-,
which inhibit other Tcells.
Their role is to maintain
self-tolerance.
Activation-induced cytidine
deaminase
(AID). An enzyme that is
required for two crucial
events in the germinal centre:
somatic hypermutation and
class-switch recombination.
Figure 1 | The gut microbiota-mediated development of the intestinal immune system. a | Segmented filamentous
bacteria (SFB) and other commensal microorganisms activate lamina propria dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages to
induce T helper 17 (T
H
17) cells and T
H
1 cells through the production of interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6 and IL-23 in the case
of T
H
17 cells, and possibly IL-12 in the case of T
H
1 cells (although the role of IL-12 in T
H
1 development in vivo in the gut
remains to be confirmed). T
H
17 cells regulate the gut microbiota community in an IL-22- and regenerating islet-derived
protein 3 (REGIII)-dependent manner. Clostridium spp. clusters IV and XIVa, polysaccharide A (PSA)
+
Bacteroides fragilis
and other microbiota stimulate intestinal epithelial cells, Tcells, and lamina propria DCs and macrophages to promote
the development and/or the activation of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)
+
regulatory T (T
Reg
) cells. b | The microbiota stimulates
intestinal epithelial cells and DCs to promote IgA-producing Bcell and plasma cell differentiation in the lamina propria.
Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation on intestinal epithelial cells induces the secretion of Bcell-activating factor (BAFF) and
a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), which promote the differentiation of IgA-producing plasma cells. Intestinal
epithelial cells also produce thymic stromal lymphoprotein (TSLP) to promote BAFF and APRIL expression by DCs. Various
types of DCs, such as plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), TIP DCs (TNF and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-producing DCs)
and TLR5
+
DCs secrete BAFF, APRIL, nitric oxide (NO), retinoic acid and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) to facilitate the
expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and IgA class-switching in Bcells. Follicular DCs (FDCs) also
induce the differentiation of IgA-producing plasma cells in Peyers patches and isolated lymphoid follicles. IgA that is
produced by lamina propria B cells is secreted into the intestinal lumen (SIgA), where it alters microbiota composition
and function. c | Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) that express retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor-t (RORt) and
produce IL-22 (termed ILC3s) regulate the gut microbiome through the induction of REGIII in intestinal epithelial cells.
The microbiota positively regulates the production of IL-22 by RORt
+
ILC3s via an unknown mechanism. In addition, the
microbiota induces IL-25 secretion by endothelial cells, which acts on lamina propria IL-17 receptor B (IL-17RB)
+
DCs,
and the IL-25-activated DC subset suppresses IL-22 production by RORt
+
ILC3s. CX
3
CR1, CX
3
C-chemokine receptor 1;
SAA, serum amyloid A protein; TGF, transforming growth factor-.
REVI EWS
NATURE REVIEWS | IMMUNOLOGY VOLUME 13 | MAY 2013 | 323
2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Follicular DCs
(FDCs). Specialized
non-haematopoietic stromal
cells that reside in the follicles
and germinal centres. These
cells possess long dendrites,
but are not related to dendritic
cells, and carry intact antigen
on their surface.
inhibits innate immune responses by affecting bacterial
gene expression
27
. The gut microbiota also regulates IgA
production, as the number of IgA-producing cells in
the intestine is markedly decreased in germ-free mice
22
.
Although the precise mechanisms by which commensal
bacteria promote the development of IgA-producing
cells remain poorly understood, bacterial recognition
through MYD88 in follicular DCs (FDCs) is known to be
important for the generation of IgA
28
(FIG.1b). Notably,
for a subset of lamina propria DCs, commensal bacteria-
derived flagellin promotes the synthesis of retinoic acid,
which is an important molecule that facilitates the differ-
entiation of IgA-producing Bcells
29,30
(FIG.1b). Likewise,
commensal bacteria promote the expression of factors
that are involved in the induction of IgA
+
Bcells, such
as tumour necrosis factor (TNF), inducible nitric oxide
synthase (iNOS; also known as NOS2), Bcell activating
factor (BAFF; also known as TNFSF13B) and a prolifer-
ation-inducing ligand (APRIL; also known as TNFSF13)
in lamina propria DCs
31,32
. In addition to TNF- and iNOS-
producing (TIP) DCs, intestinal plasma cells express TNF
and iNOS following microbial exposure, which further
promotes the IgA secretory function of intestinal B cells
33
(FIG.1b). Thus, the microbiota instructs lamina propria
DCs and/or FDCs to induce the differentiation of IgA-
producing Bcells, and in turn, IgA regulates the func-
tion and composition of the gut microbiota to maintain
mutualism between the host and the microbiota.
ILCs. Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are increasingly recog-
nized as innate immune cells that share functional charac-
teristics with Tcells (reviewed in REFS34,35). ILCs arise
from a common lymphoid precursor cell but differenti-
ate into multiple lineages on the basis of the expression
of specific transcriptional factors. Currently, ILCs have
been categorized into three main groups: T-bet
+
ILCs
(termed ILC1s) GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3)
+
ILCs (termed ILC2s), and retinoic acid receptor-related
orphan receptor-t (RORt)
+
ILCs (termed ILC3s)
3437
.
The role of the microbiota in the development and
the function of ILCs has been controversial. Although
some studies report that the microbiota is required for
the differentiation of ILCs and for their production of
IL-22 (REFS38,39) (FIG.1c), another study suggested that
the microbiota suppressed IL-22 production by RORt
+
ILCs
40
(FIG.1c). A crucial function of IL-22 is to promote
antimicrobial peptide production by intestinal epithe-
lial cells. Specifically, IL-22 induces the expression of the
C-type lectin antimicrobial peptides regenerating islet-
derived protein 3 (REGIII) and REGIII, which can
affect the gut microbiota
41,42
. Depletion of either IL-22 or
IL-22-producing ILCs leads to overgrowth and/or dis-
semination of potentially pathogenic bacteria, such as
Alcaligenes xylosoxidans, which might increase the risk
of subsequent intestinal damage and systemic inflamma-
tion
43
. Thus, the regulation of gut-specific immune cells
by commensal bacteria has far-reaching effects that are
not limited to immune homeostasis, but also include the
regulation of the balance between beneficial and poten-
tially pathogenic commensals in the microbiota, and
resistance to intestinal pathology.
Microbiota and resistance to pathogens
It has been known for many years that germ-free mice
are more susceptible to infection than conventionally
raised mice
44,45
. Furthermore, treatment with antibiot-
ics is associated with increased colonization of patho-
gens in both mice and humans
4649
. These observations
indicate that an important function of the indigenous
microbiota might be to protect the host from infection.
The mechanisms by which commensal bacteria achieve
this remain poorly understood, but there is evidence
to indicate that both direct and indirect mechanisms
might be involved.
Direct competition for nutrients. Several studies have
shown that commensal bacteria can inhibit pathogen
colonization by successfully competing for the limited
supply of nutrients within the intestine. For example,
Escherichia coli competes with enterohaemorrhagic
E.coli (EHEC; an enteric pathogen that causes substan-
tial morbidity and mortality worldwide) for organic
acids, amino acids and other nutrients
5053
(FIG.2). As
different commensal E.coli strains have distinct meta-
bolic profiles, each strain can differentially compete
with pathogens
53
. Although our understanding of how
commensal bacteria outcompete pathogens is still
poor, studies thus far indicate that pathogen eradica-
tion might be most effective with bacteria that are meta-
bolically related to the pathogen. For example, E.coli,
but not Bacteroides spp., can effectively outcompete the
metabolically related pathogen Citrobacter rodentium,
which is a mouse bacterium that models infection by
enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and EHEC
54
. The
ability of E.coli to outcompete C.rodentium is partly
mediated by competition for simple sugars that are used
by both bacteria in the intestine
54
(FIG.2).
Likewise, the enteric pathogen Salmonella enteria
subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium is capable of colo-
nizing the intestine of mice that have been harbouring
a limited microbiota for several weeks, but it is rapidly
eradicated after co-housing with conventionally raised
mice, which indicates that not all commensal bacteria
have the ability to out-compete the pathogen
55
. The
metabolic activity of the microbiota can also affect
pathogen colonization by a mechanism that is distinct
from nutritional competition. The commensal bacterial
strain B.thetaiotaomicron produces multiple fucosidases
that generate fucose from host-derived glycans, such as
mucin, and this modulates the expression of EHEC viru-
lence genes through the activation of the fucose sensor
FusKR
56
(FIG.2).
Pathogens, in turn, have also evolved strategies to over-
come competition by commensal bacteria. One strategy
is to use nutrients that are not primarily metabolized
by commensal bacteria. Carbohydrate usage can differ
substantially between pathogenic and commensal E.coli
strains
52,57
. For example, EHEC, but not certain commen-
sal E.coli strains, can use galactose, hexuronates, man-
nose, ribose and ethanolamine, which is released into the
intestine during epithelial cell turnover, as a carbon or
nitrogen source
52,58
. Use of ethanolamine can be explained
by the presence of the ethanolamine utilization(eut)
REVI EWS
324 | MAY 2013 | VOLUME 13 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol
2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Nature Reviews | Immunology
M
i
c
r
o
b
i
o
t
a
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
Virulence factor
expression
Nutrients
specically
used by
pathogens
Competition
for nutrients
Fucose
Pathogen Pathogen
Pathogen
colonization
Pathogen colonization
Systemic translocation
Direct
Commensal
microbiota
P
a
t
h
o
g
e
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
Indirect
Neutrophil
Macrophage
B cell
T
H
1 or
T
H
17 cell
ILC3
IL-1
and
IL-23
IL-1
Induce
pro-IL-1
Inamed
epithelial cell IL-22
IL-22
Plasma cell
REGIII
Mucus
SCFAs
Epithelial
cell
Killing (T6SS)
REGIII
IgA
Lamina
propria
Gut
lumen
Barrier function
TypeIV secretion system
(T6SS). An export system that
is used by Gram-negative
bacteria to deliver effector
proteins to other cells in a cell
contact-dependent manner.
operon in the genome of the EHEC strain and not in the
commensal E.coli strain
58
. Thus, pathogens have evolved
to use nutritional resources that are not consumed by
commensal bacteria to acquire a growth advantage.
Another strategy used by pathogens is the induction of
inflammation by their virulence factors. For example,
infection by S. Typhimurium results in the production
of reactive oxygen species by neutrophils, which facili-
tates the conversion of endogenous thio sulphate into
tetrathionate, thereby selectively promoting the growth
of S. Typhimurium
59,60
(FIG.2). Moreover, virulence factors
such as intimin allow C.rodentium to attach to the host
epithelium where commensal bacteria do not normally
reside
54
. Localization to epithelium-associated niches
might also allow certain pathogens such as EPEC and
EHEC to use nutrients that are available at or near the
epithelium and to escape from direct competition with
resident microorganisms (FIG.2). Furthermore, certain
Gram-negative enteric pathogens, such as Serratia marce-
scens and C.rodentium, can directly kill their commensal
competitors through the expression of the type VI secretion
system (T6SS)
61,62
(FIG.2). Thus, the outcome of infection
by pathogens is ultimately determined by both host and
commensal bacterial factors.
Figure 2 | Direct and indirect resistance of the microbiota to colonization by enteric pathogens. Direct competition
between pathogens and commensal bacteria is shown on the left-hand side. Resident microorganisms directly inhibit
the colonization and/or the proliferation of incoming enteric pathogens. Commensal microorganisms can outcompete
pathogens for shared nutrients, such as carbohydrates, amino acids and organic acids. In addition, commensal bacterial
strains such as Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron catabolize mucin to produce fucose, which inhibits virulence factor expression
by pathogenic Escherichia coli. Enteric pathogens have evolved strategies to overcome competition by commensal
bacteria. Some pathogens can directly kill their commensal competitors through their type VI secretion system (T6SS).
Pathogen-induced inflammation, which leads to increased epithelial cell turnover, provides nutrients that selectively
promote the growth of pathogens. Moreover, pathogens can localize to epithelium-associated niches that are devoid of
commensal bacteria and use nutrients near the epithelium to escape direct competition with resident microorganisms.
Indirect mechanisms of competition between commensal bacteria and pathogens are shown on the right-hand side.
Commensal bacteria catabolize polysaccharides to generate short-chain fatty acid (SCFAs), such as acetate, which
enhances intestinal epithelial cell barrier function. In addition, commensal microbiota promotes the production of mucus
and the release of antimicrobial peptides such as regenerating islet-derived protein 3 (REGIII) from epithelial cells to limit
pathogen colonization and proliferation. Innate immune cells, such as intestinal resident macrophages, neutrophils and
some group 3 innate lymphoid cells (namely ILC3s), as well as T helper 1 (T
H
1) cells, T
H
17 cells and IgA-producing Bcells
and plasma cells, are also activated by the microbiota to limit pathogen colonization. IL, interleukin.
REVI EWS
NATURE REVIEWS | IMMUNOLOGY VOLUME 13 | MAY 2013 | 325
2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Inflammasome
A molecular complex of several
proteins, including a NOD-like
receptor (NLR), the adaptor
protein ASC and a caspase,
that, upon assembly, cleaves
pro-interleukin-1 (pro-IL-1)
and pro-IL-18, thereby
producing mature IL-1 and
IL-18.
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor
(AHR). A cytosolic,
ligand-dependent transcription
factor that translocates to the
nucleus following the binding
of specific ligands, which
include dietary and microbial
metabolites. AHR participates
in the differentiation of
regulatory Tcells, T helper 17
(T
H
17) cells and intraepithelial
intestinal Tcells, and it is
required for the secretion of
interleukin-22 by T
H
17 cells.
More recently, AHR has been
shown to have crucial roles in
the development and function
of group 3 innate lymphoid
cells, including lymphoid tissue
inducer (LTi) cells and ILC3s.
Commensal bacteria promote mucosal barrier function.
The attachment of pathogens to the surface of the intes-
tinal epithelium is a crucial initial step for infection to
occur. As a defence mechanism, the epithelium produces
mucus and antimicrobial molecules to inhibit pathogen
invasion. In the colon, the mucus layer forms a strong bar-
rier against both pathogens and commensal bacteria
63,64
.
In the small and large intestines, the inner mucus layer
near the epithelium is devoid of commensal bacteria
63,64
.
However, the mucus layer in germ-free mice is much
thinner than that in conventionally raised mice, which
indicates that the microbiota might contribute to mucus
production
65
(FIG.2). Consistent with this hypothesis, the
thickness of the mucus layer of germ-free mice can be
restored to normal by oral administration of the bacterial
products lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and peptidoglycan
65
.
The microbiota also contributes to the production of
antimicrobial molecules by epithelial cells of the small
and large intestines (FIG.2). For example, REGIII and
REGIII that are contained in Paneth cell granules
are released into the lumen to regulate hostbacte-
ria inter actions through their antimicrobial activity
66
.
Epithelium-intrinsic deletion of MYD88 impairs the
production of REGIII and REGIII; therefore, it seems
that recognition of the microbiota by TLRs medi-
ates the expression of these antimicrobial peptides
42,66
.
Importantly, the impaired production of REGIII and
REGIII increases the susceptibility of mice to infection
by enteric pathogens including Listeria mono cytogenes,
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and S.enterica subsp. enterica
serovar Enteritidis
6769
.
The microbiota can also enhance epithelial barrier
function through the production of metabolites. For
instance, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), especially
acetate, produced by Bifidobacterium spp. act on the epi-
thelium to inhibit the translocation of Shiga toxin that is
produced by E.coli O157:H7 (REF.45) (FIG.2). The precise
signalling mechanism by which bacterial products and
metabolites enhance epithelial defence, and how this
mutually affects the microbiota and the host, remains
to be elucidated.
The microbiota enhances innate immunity to patho-
gens. Mononuclear phagocytes, such as macrophages
and DCs, are located in the lamina propria and promote
immunological unresponsiveness to commensal bacteria,
which is important for maintaining gut homeostasis
70,71
.
Specifically, gut-resident phagocytes are hyporespon-
sive to microbial ligands and commensal bacteria, and
they do not produce biologically significant levels of
pro-inflammatory molecules upon stimulation
7072
.
However, the microbiota is essential for upregulating
the production of pro-IL-1, the precursor to IL-1, in
resident mononuclear phagocytes
71
. Under steady-state
conditions when the epithelial barrier is intact, resident
commensal bacteria cannot also induce the processing of
pro-IL-1 into biologically active mature IL-1 and thus a
state of hyporesponsiveness is maintained
71
. By contrast,
infection by enteric pathogens such as S. Typhimurium
and Pseudomonasaeruginosa can induce the processing
of pro-IL-1 by promoting the activation of caspase 1
via the NLRC4 (NOD-, LRR- and CARD-containing 4)
inflammasome
71
. Unlike commensal bacteria, these patho-
gens are capable of activating the NLRC4 inflammasome
to produce IL-1 because they express a typeIII secretion
system, which allows the transfer of the NLRC4 agonist
flagellin into the host cytosol
71
. Consequently, BALB/c
mice that are deficient in NLRC4 or in the IL-1 receptor
(IL-1R) are highly susceptible to orogastric infection with
S. Typhimurium
71
. The protective role of IL-1 in intesti-
nal immunity is, at least partly, mediated by its ability to
induce the expression of endothelial adhesion molecules
that contribute to neutrophil recruitment and pathogen
clearance in the intestine. Thus, NLRC4-dependent IL-1
production by resident phagocytes represents a specific
response that can discriminate between pathogenic and
commensal bacteria.
The intestinal microbiota also promotes immunity
through the production of IL-22 by ILC3s
38
. Germ-free
mice show impaired intestinal production of IL-22, which
indicates that there might be a requirement for commen-
sal bacteria or their metabolites
16
. Mice with defects in
IL-22-expressing cells exhibit increased susceptibility to
C.rodentium infection, which indicates that commen-
sal bacterial-driven IL-22 that is produced by ILC3s is
important for protection against infectious pathogens
38,73,74
.
Consistent with this idea, administration of IL-22 to
aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr)
/
mice, which exhibit
impaired IL-22 production, provides protection against
C.rodentium infection
74
. Taken together, these results
indicate that commensal bacteria might also promote host
defence by stimulating ILCs to produce IL-22 (FIG.2).
The microbiota promotes adaptive immunity. As men-
tioned above, specific commensal bacteria promote
the generation of different Tcell subsets in the intes-
tine
12,14,1921,75
that have unique roles during pathogen
infection (FIG.2). For instance, T
H
17 cell differentiation
that is induced by SFB colonization facilitates protec-
tion against C.rodentium infection
14
. Likewise, micro-
biota-induced T
Reg
cells attenuate intestinal damage that
is caused by exaggerated immune responses against
infectious pathogens. Specifically, B.fragilis promotes
IL-10-producing T
Reg
cells that protect against Helicobacter
hepaticus infection
21,76
, and Bifidobacterium infantis
increases the number of T
Reg
cells that attenuate intes-
tinal disease severity following S. Typhimurium infec-
tion
77
. Commensal bacteria also induce specific immune
responses, including IgA production and the generation
of CD4
+
Tcells, that are directed against their own anti-
gens
7880
. Although the precise role of commensal bacte-
ria-specific adaptive immunity against invasive pathogens
remains poorly understood, there is evidence indicating
that it is important for limiting the systemic dissemination
of commensal bacteria
81
. The induction of this firewall
function of the adaptive immune system by the micro-
biota might prevent collateral damage which could be
caused by the translocation of indigenous bacteria that
is often associated with pathogen infection and epithelial
barrier disruption. In addition, it might contribute to the
elimination of pathogens through opsonization or other
immune mechanisms.
REVI EWS
326 | MAY 2013 | VOLUME 13 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol
2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Inflammatory bowel disease
(IBD). Immune-mediated
inflammation of the bowel.
There are two main forms:
Crohns disease, which is a
granulomatous segmental
inflammation affecting any part
of the intestine; and ulcerative
colitis, which is a mucosal
inflammation involving the
rectum and extending for a
variable distance along the
colon. In developed countries,
the incidence of inflammatory
bowel disease is approximately
one in 50,000. It usually starts
in early adult life and continues
afterwards with a relapsing,
remitting course.
SAMP1/yit mice
A mutant mouse strain that
spontaneously develops a
chronic intestinal inflammation
that is mainly localized in the
terminal ileum.
Autophagy
An evolutionarily conserved
process in which acidic
double-membrane vacuoles
sequester intracellular
contents (such as damaged
organelles and
macromolecules) and target
them for degradation through
fusion to secondary lysosomes.
-defensins
One subset of defensin
proteins. Defensins and
cathelicidins are members of a
family of small antimicrobial
polypeptides that are
abundant in neutrophils and
epithelial cells. They contribute
to host defence by disrupting
the cytoplasmic membrane of
microorganisms.
Protective role of the commensal microbiota against sys-
temic infection. The mechanism by which the micro-
biota promotes systemic pathogen eradication is poorly
understood. Pretreatment of germ-free mice with LPS
induces pro-inflammatory cytokine production and
neutrophil recruitment, and can prevent systemic bac-
terial infection
82
. This observation indicates that com-
mensal bacteria might, at least partly, promote host
defence at distant sites through the release of microbial
molecules. Consistent with this hypothesis, peptido-
glycan molecules that are derived from the microbiota
are found in the periphery and can prime peripheral
blood neutrophils to facilitate their bactericidal capacity
via NOD1 signalling
83
. This neutrophil priming effect,
which is presumably induced by intestinal bacteria,
enhances host defence against systemic infection with
Streptococcus pneumoniae
83
.
The microbiota might also have an important role in
systemic antiviral immune responses. Germ-free mice
and antibiotic-treated mice show reduced innate and
adaptive immune responses to influenza virus, which
results in increased viral loads in their tissues
84,85
. The
microbiota might enhance antiviral immunity through
the inflammasome and the production of innate
cytokines that are required for optimal immune responses
against viruses
84
. For example, the microbiota promotes
type I interferon (IFN) production by macrophages
and the subsequent IFN-priming of natural killer (NK)
cells, which is important for protection against infection
with mouse cytomegalovirus and lymphocytic chorio-
meningitis virus
86
. Moreover, the gut microbiota induces
intestinal TLR-dependent DC activation and inhibits
systemic parasitic infection
87
. Recent studies also indicate
that commensal bacteria might provide tissue-specific
defence mechanisms, as has been demonstrated by the
protection provided by resident skin bacteria against
local pathogen infection
88
.
Taken together, these studies using different infection
models show a protective effect of the microbiota against
systemic infection; however, additional studies are nec-
essary to identify the underlying mechanisms as well as
the relative contributions of host defence mechanisms
that are promoted by the microbiota of specific tissues
such as the skin or the respiratory tract. It is also impor-
tant to note that commensal bacteria do not always pro-
tect against pathogenic infection and in certain contexts
they can facilitate it (as discussed below)
8991
.
The microbiota and intestinal disease
The microbiota contributes to IBD. The gut micro-
biota is essential for triggering or enhancing chronic
intestinal inflammation in various inflammatory bowel
disease (IBD)-prone mouse strains (TABLE 1). Under
germ-free conditions, Il10
/
or Tcra
/
mice, as well as
transgenic rats that have been engineered to overexpress
HLA-B27 and human 2 microglobulin, do not develop
colitis
9295
. In Il2
/
or SAMP1/yit mice, although sponta-
neous intestinal inflammation occurs even under germ-
free conditions ,symptoms are attenuated compared
with conventionally raised mutant mice
96,97
. In many
spontaneous colitis models, intestinal inflammation is
abrogated if mice also have a deficiency in individual
TLRs or in MYD88. For example, spontaneous coli-
tis that develops in Il10
/
mice, in conditional signal
transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3)
/
mice or in mice with a deletion in inhibitor of nuclear
factor-B kinase- (IKK; also known as NEMO) spe-
cifically in intestinal epithelial cells (NEMO
IEC
mice)
is reversed when these mice also lack TLRs or MYD88
(REFS98101). However, Il2
/
mice that are deficient in
MYD88 still develop spontaneous colitis
99
. In this model,
the microbiota might drive colitis through the promo-
tion of inflammatory T
H
17 cell responses
12
that occur
independently ofMYD88.
Similar to mice, human intestinal mononuclear
phagocytes show hyporesponsiveness to microbial stim-
ulation under steady-state conditions
102,103
. However, in
patients with IBD, intestinal mononuclear phagocytes
robustly respond to microbial products and to the resi-
dent bacteria, which results in the production of large
amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF
and IL-23, as occurs in IBD-prone mice
103
. Thus, the
abnormal activation of resident intestinal mononuclear
phagocytes by commensal bacteria might facilitate the
development or persistence of intestinal inflammation in
IBD. Consistent with this idea, intestinal macrophages
isolated from Il10
/
mice robustly respond to gut bac-
teria, whereas wild-type intestinal macrophages are
hyporesponsive
7072
. However, the increased production
of pro-inflammatory molecules by intestinal phagocytes
might also reflect the activity of recruited monocytes
in areas of infection or inflammation.
There is genetic evidence showing that the impaired
recognition and killing of commensal bacteria also con-
tributes to IBD development, as has been suggested by
the fact that many of the identified IBD-susceptibility
genes regulate hostmicrobial interactions
104
. NOD2,
which is an intracellular sensor of bacterial peptidog-
lycan, was identified as a susceptibility gene for Crohns
disease, and Crohns disease-associated NOD2 muta-
tions are associated with a loss of function of the pro-
tein
105107
. Mutations in the autophagy regulatory genes
autophagy related gene 16-like 1 (ATG16L1) and immu-
nity-related GTPase family M (IRGM) are also linked
to Crohns disease
108,109
, and autophagy dysfunction is
associated with defects in bacterial killing
110112
. In addi-
tion, NOD2 and autophagy proteins regulate the func-
tion of Paneth cells, which release granules containing
antimicrobial peptides in response to bacteria
113
. NOD2
is highly expressed in Paneth cells, and some studies
report diminished expression of Paneth cell -defensins
in individuals with Crohns disease-associated NOD2
mutations
114,115
. Nod2
/
mice have impaired antimicro-
bial functions in Paneth cells, resulting in the accumu-
lation of ileal bacteria, which might contribute to IBD
pathogenesis
116
. Atg16l1-mutant (Atg16l1
HM
) mice show
abnormal granule formation in Paneth cells, which is
also observed in patients with Crohns disease who
have homozygous mutations in ATG16L1 (REF.117). In
Atg16l1
HM
mice this abnormality can be triggered by
enteric viral infection (for example, by murine noro-
virus) and is associated with increased susceptibility
REVI EWS
NATURE REVIEWS | IMMUNOLOGY VOLUME 13 | MAY 2013 | 327
2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
to chemically induced colitis
118
. Thus, defects in host
mechanisms that recognize and clear bacteria are
associated with the development of human IBD. How
genetic defects lead to chronic colitis in patients with
IBD remains unknown, but it is possible that impaired
NOD2 or autophagy function might result in the accu-
mulation of intestinal commensal bacteria that have the
capacity to locally invade the intestinal mucosa and to
trigger an abnormal inflammatory response.
The role of the pathobiont in IBD. As non-pathogenic
symbionts, the gut microbiota derives nutritional ben-
efits from the host and help to maintain gut homeostasis.
However, under certain conditions, particular bacterial
populations that are typically found in very low abun-
dance can acquire pathogenic properties. These condi-
tions include inherent immune defects as well as changes
in diet and/or acute inflammation, and can result in
the disruption of the normal balanced state of the gut
Table 1 | Role of the gut microbiota in the protection or induction of IBD
Commensal bacterium Host Genotype Disease Receptors Possible mechanism Refs
Commensal microbiota that protect against IBD
Clostridium spp. clusters
IV and XIVa
Mouse Wild-type DSS colitis Unknown Induction of T
Reg
cells 19
Altered Schaedler flora Mouse Wild-type DSS colitis MYD88 and
TRIF
Induction of T
Reg
cells 20
Bacteroides fragilis Mouse Wild-type TNBS colitis TLR2, MYD88 Induction of T
Reg
cells via
polysaccharide A
21
Bacteroides vulgatus Mouse Il2
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Suppression of Escherichia coli-
triggered colitis in Il2
/
mice
120
Faecalibacterium
prausnitzii
Human NA IBD Unknown Induction of IL-10 by PBMCs 148
Commensal microbiota that promote the development of IBD
E. coli Mouse Il10
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Monocolonization of germ-free
mice induces colitis
119
E.coli Mouse Il2
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Monocolonization of germ-free
mice induces colitis
96, 120
Enterococcus faecalis Mouse Il10
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Monocolonization of germ-free
mice induces colitis
119
B.vulgatus Rat HLA-B27B2m
transgenic
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Monocolonization of germ-free
rats induces colitis
96
B.vulgatus Mouse Il10r2
/
Tgfbr2
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Colonization of antibiotic-
treated mice triggers colitis
122
Bacteroides
thetaiotaomicron
Mouse Il10r2
/
Tgfbr2
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Colonization of antibiotic-treated
mice triggers colitis
122
B.thetaiotaomicron Rat HLA-B27B2m
transgenic
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Monocolonization of germ-free
rats induces colitis
95
Bacteroides unifirmatis Mouse Il10r2
/
Tgfbr2
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Colonization of antibiotic-treated
mice triggers colitis
122
Klebsiella pneumoniae*
Mouse Tbx21
/
Rag2
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Other commensal bacteria are
required for the induction of colitis
123,124
Proteus mirabilis*
Mouse Tbx21
/
Rag2
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Other commensal bacteria are
required for the induction of colitis
123,124
Helicobacter typhlonius* Mouse Tbx21
/
Rag2
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Transmissible to non-colitogenic
TRUC mice
125
Prevotellaceae*
Mouse Nlrp6
/
, Asc
/
or
Casp1
/
DSS colitis Unknown Impaired IL-18 signalling promotes
pathobiont expansion
126
TM7*
Mouse Nlrp6
/
, Asc
/
or
Casp1
/
DSS colitis Unknown Impaired IL-18 signalling promotes
pathobiont expansion
126
Bilophila wadsworthia Mouse Il10
/
Spontaneous colitis Unknown Consumption of a diet composed
of milk-derived fat induces
pathobiont expansion
128
B2m, gene encoding 2-microglobulin; Casp1, caspase 1; DSS, dextran-sulphate sodium; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IL, interleukin; MYD88, myeloid
differentiation primary-response protein 88; NA, not applicable; Nlrp6, NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing 6; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells;
Rag2, recombination-activating gene 2; Tbx21, T-box 21 (encodes T-bet); Tgfbr2, transforming growth factor- receptor 2; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TNBS,
2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid; T
Reg
cell, regulatory Tcell; TRIF, TIR domain-containing adaptor protein inducing IFN; TRUC, Tbx21
/
Rag2
/
mice.
*Transmissable to mutant hosts.