RESEARCH ARTICLES

Forest conservation, afforestation and

reforestation in India: Implications for
forest carbon stocks
N. H. Ravindranath1,*, Rajiv Kumar Chaturvedi2 and Indu K. Murthy2
1
Centre for Sustainable Technologies, and 2Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India

new area brought under afforestation and reforestation for

This article presents an assessment of the implications
of past and current forest conservation and regenera- the period 2006–30.
tion policies and programmes for forest carbon sink in We have primarily relied on published data from the
India. The area under forests, including part of the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF), Govern-
area afforested, is increasing and currently 67.83 mha ment of India (GOI); Food and Agricultural Organization
of area is under forest cover. Assuming that the cur- of United Nations (FAO), and Forest Survey of India
rent trend continues, the area under forest cover is (FSI). We have used the Comprehensive Mitigation Analy-
projected to reach 72 mha by 2030. Estimates of car- sis Process (COMAP) model for projecting carbon stock
bon stock in Indian forests in both soil and vegetation estimates. The article is based only on past trends from
range from 8.58 to 9.57 GtC. The carbon stock in ex- 1980 to 2005 and uses the assumption – ‘if the current trend
isting forests is projected to be nearly stable over the continues’. We feel that such an assumption is well justi-
next 25 year period at 8.79 GtC. However, if the cur-
fied because, despite the increase in population and in-
rent rate of afforestation and reforestation is assumed
to continue, the carbon stock could increase from dustrialization during 1980–2005, forest area in India not
8.79 GtC in 2006 to 9.75 GtC by 2030 – an increase of only remained stable but has marginally increased. This
11%. The estimates made in this study assume that is due to favourable policies and initiatives pursued by
the current trend will continue and do not include GOI. We expect that India will not only keep pursuing
forest degradation and loss of carbon stocks due to aggressive policies of afforestation and forest conserva-
biomass extraction, fire, grazing and other distur- tion, but also go a step forward. A case in point is the
bances. Prime Minister’s recently announced ‘6 mha greening
programme’. If the assumptions of continuation of cur-
Keywords: Afforestation, carbon stocks, conservation, rent rates of afforestation, forest conservation policies
reforestation. and no significant degradation of forest carbon stocks are
changed, the future carbon stocks projected will also
INDIA is a large developing country known for its diverse change.
forest ecosystems and is also a mega-biodiversity country.
Forest ecosystems in India are critical for biodiversity,
Area under forests
watershed protection, and livelihoods of indigenous and
rural communities. The National Communication of the
Government of India to the UNFCCC has reported1 that According to FSI, ‘all lands, more than one hectare in
the forest sector is a marginal source of CO2 emissions. area, with a tree canopy density of more than 10 per cent
India has formulated and implemented a number of poli- are defined as Forest’. The total forest cover in India ac-
cies and programmes aimed at forest and biodiversity cording to the latest3 State of Forest Report 2003 is
conservation, afforestation and reforestation. Further, India 67.83 mha and this constitutes 20.64% of the geographic
has a goal2 to bring one-third of the geographic area un- area. The distribution of area under very dense, dense and
der forest and tree cover by 2012. All forest policies and open forest is given in Table 1. Dense forest dominates,
programmes have implications for carbon sink and forest accounting for about half of the total forest cover. Tree
management. This article presents an assessment of the cover (which includes forests of less than 1 ha) is 9.99 mha
implications of past and current forest conservation and (3.04%). The total area under forest and tree cover is
regeneration policies and programmes for forest carbon 77.82 mha, which is 23.68% of the geographic area (Table 1).
sink in India. It also estimates the carbon stocks under FAO4 defines forests as ‘Land spanning more than 0.5 ha
current trend scenario for the existing forests as well as with trees higher than 5 m and a canopy cover of more
than 10%, or trees able to reach these thresholds in situ’.
And other woodlands as ‘Land not classified as “Forest”,
*For correspondence. (e-mail: [email protected]) spanning more than 0.5 ha; with trees higher than 5 m

216 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 95, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2008

 RESEARCH ARTICLES

and a canopy cover of 5–10 per cent, or trees able to early 1980s. Figure 2 shows the progress of afforestation
reach these thresholds in situ; or with a combined cover in India for the period 1951–2005. It can be seen from
of shrubs, bushes and trees above 10 per cent. Both of Figure 2 that the cumulative area afforested in India dur-
these categories do not include the land that is predomi- ing the period 1980–2005 is about 34 mha, at an average
nantly under agricultural or urban land use’. According to annual rate2 of 1.32 mha2. This includes community wood-
FAO, the area under forests and other wooded land in lots, farm forestry, avenue plantations and agro-forestry.
India has increased from 63.93 mha in 1990 to 67.70 mha Afforestation and reforestation in India are being carried
in 2005. Thus FAO estimates do not significantly differ out under various programmes, namely social forestry
from FSI estimates. initiated in the early 1980s, Joint Forest Management
Programme initiated in 1990, afforestation under National
Afforestation and Eco-development Board (NAEB) pro-
Trends in area under forest and tree cover
grammes since 1992, and private farmer and industry-
initiated plantation forestry.
The FSI has been periodically estimating the forest cover
in India since 1987, using remote sensing techniques. The
forest cover reported5 for 1987 was 64.08 mha and ac- Future trends in area under forests and
cording to the latest assessment3 for 2003, the forest afforestation
cover is 67.83 mha. This indicates an increase in forest The projections for area under forest as well as area affor-
cover of 3.75 mha over a period of 15 years (Figure 1). It ested are based on current trends or what is generally
can be observed from Figure 1 that the forest cover in In- termed the ‘current trend scenario’. The current trend sce-
dia has nearly stabilized and has been increasing margin- nario is based on the past, current and short-term affore-
ally over the years3,5–12. FSI has included the tree cover in station plans. The projections exclude the tree cover
the 2001 and 2003 assessments3,6, in addition to forest component as reported in 2001 and 2003 by the FSI.
cover. The area under tree cover reported is also found to
be marginally increasing (Figure 1).
Projections for area under forest cover based on
current trend scenario
Afforestation and reforestation programmes
The forest cover is projected up to 2030, based on the
India has been implementing an aggressive afforestation past and current trends, as reported by the periodic re-
programme. The country initiated large-scale afforesta-
tion under the social forestry programme starting in the

Table 1. Status of forest cover in India3,4

Per cent
Tree crown class Area (mha) geographic area

Very dense forest (>70%) 5.13 1.56

Dense forest (40–70%) 33.93 10.32
Open forest (10–40%) 28.78 8.76
Mangroves 0.45 0.14
Total forest cover 67.83 20.64
Tree cover 9.99 3.04
Figure 2. Cumulative area afforested2 during 1951–2005.
Total 77.82 23.68
Forest cover according to FAO 67.7 – 80

70

90 60
80
Forest cover (Mha)

50
Forest and tree cover (Mha)

70

60 40

50
30
40
20
30
20 10
10
0
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
2025
2027
2029
2031

0
1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

Forest cover Tree cover

Figure 3. Projected trend in forest cover under the current trend sce-
Figure 1. Trends in area under forest and tree cover3,5–12. nario3,5–12.

CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 95, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2008 217

RESEARCH ARTICLES

ports of the FSI. It can be observed from Figure 3 that the natural regeneration (with no logging) and afforesta-
forest cover will continue to increase all the way up to tion/reforestation through plantation forestry, including
2030. The forest cover is projected to reach 72.19 mha by short- as well as long-rotation forestry (with logging or har-
2030, assuming that the current trend scenario will con- vesting).
tinue. Assessment of mitigation activities using the COMAP
model would involve consideration of the following:
Projected afforestation rates based on current
trends • Land availability for different mitigation activities
during different years.
The long-term average annual rate of afforestation over • Wood product demand and supply to ensure that socio-
the period 1980–2005 is 1.32 mha. Assuming the average economic demands are met with and real additional
rate2 of 1.32 mha for the period 2006–30, the total area mitigation is feasible.
that would be afforested is 33 mha. The cumulative area • Developing a baseline or current trend scenario to enable
afforested would be 70.5 mha by 2030 (Figure 4). This estimation of incremental carbon mitigation.
includes short- and long-rotation plantation forestry as • Developing a mitigation scenario incorporating the
well as natural regeneration. It is important to note that extent of area to be covered for meeting different
some of the afforested area, particularly short-rotation goals.
plantations, is likely to be periodically harvested and re-
planted or left for coppice regrowth. Data required for assessing different activities: The data
required for assessing the mitigation potential of affore-
station and reforestation include land area-related infor-
Carbon stocks in forests
mation, baseline carbon density (tC/ha) in above-ground
vegetation and soil, rotation period, above-ground woody
The forest sector could be a source or a sink of carbon.
biomass accumulation rate (tC/ha/yr), soil carbon en-
Forest carbon stock includes biomass and soil carbon
hancement rate (tC/ha/yr), and cost and benefit flows. In-
pools. Biomass carbon can be further disaggregated into
put data were obtained from the literature14,15.
aboveground and belowground biomass and dead organic
Outputs of the COMAP model: These include mitiga-
matter. Change in forest carbon stock between two time
tion potential estimates per ha and aggregate tonnes of
periods is an indicator of the net emissions of CO2 from
carbon benefit, annual carbon stocks, carbon stocks for a
the sector. Carbon stocks are estimated and projected for
given year such as 2008 and 2012 and cumulative over a
the period 2005–30.
period, and cost-effectiveness parameters.

Methodology
Carbon stock estimates
The COMAP model13 is a set of versatile models with the
ability to analyse the mitigation potential as well as cost- Estimates for the forest carbon stocks, including biomass
effectiveness of diverse activities such as forest conserva- and soil carbon from previous studies are given in Figure
tion (e.g. Protected Areas and halting forest conversion), 5. According to an earlier estimate by Richards and Flint16,

12000

10000
Carbon stock (MtC)

8000

6000

4000

2000

0
1880

1980

1986

1986

1994

2005

Biomass carbon Soil carbon

Figure 4. Projected afforestation under the current trend scenario. Figure 5. Trends in carbon stock estimates for Indian forests15–19.

218 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 95, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2008

 RESEARCH ARTICLES
10000 12000
9000
10000
8000

Carbon stock (MtC)

Carbon stock (MtC)
7000 8000
6000
5000 6000
4000
3000
4000
2000
2000
1000
0 0
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030

Forest Short rotation Long rotation Natural regeneration Soil carbon Biomass carbon

Figure 6. Projected forest carbon stocks. a, Under the current trend scenario for existing forests and area afforested (short- and
long-rotation and natural regeneration). b, According to biomass and soil carbon.

the biomass carbon stock in Indian forests was 7.94 MtC Factors contributing to stabilization of carbon
during 1880. This study does not provide soil carbon esti- stocks in Indian forests
mates. Further estimates by the same authors for 1980
showed that forest biomass carbon stock had declined by India is one of the few countries where deforestation rate
nearly half over a period of 100 years. Estimates17–19 of has been reduced and regulated and forest cover nearly
forest carbon stock, including biomass and soil carbon for stabilized, unlike most other tropical countries. Further,
the year 1986, are in the range 8.58–9.57 GtC. According the projections of carbon stocks for the period 2006–30
to a latest estimate by FAO4, total forest carbon stock in showed that the carbon stock will increase. Thus, it is
India is 10.01 GtC. Thus, the carbon stocks in Indian forests important to understand the likely factors contributing to
have not declined, and in fact seem to have increased, the observed and projected stabilization of forest cover as
over a period of 20 years (1986–2005). Forest soil carbon well as forest carbon stocks in India. The factors include
accounts for over 50% of the total forest carbon stock. legislations, forest conservation and afforestation pro-
grammes, and community awareness and participation.
Carbon stock projections under current trend
scenario Forest Conservation Act, 1980

Carbon stock projections for the existing forests as well This Act is one of the most effective legislations contrib-
as new area brought under afforestation and reforestation uting to reduction in deforestation. This was enacted to
for the current trend scenario are made for the period reduce indiscriminate diversion of forest land for non-
2006–30. The carbon stock projections are made using forestry purposes, and to help regulate and control the re-
the COMAP model. The forest cover data were obtained corded forest land-use changes.
from the projections made using the FSI area trends (Fig-
ure 3) and afforestation rates were obtained from the past Compensatory afforestation
trends (average annual rate of 1.32 mha). The biomass
and soil carbon stock and growth rates were obtained from According to Forest Conservation Act, 1980, when after
published literature14,15. The afforestation rate of 1.32 mha/ careful consideration forest land is released for any infra-
annum was allocated to short- and long-rotation and natu- structure projects, it is mandatory for compensatory plan-
ral regeneration at 63.7, 32.2 and 4.1% respectively, tations to be raised on an equivalent non-forested land or
based on the previous years’ trend 12. equal to double the area on degraded forestland.
The carbon stock projections for the period 2006–30
are given in Figure 6. The carbon stock in the existing for-
ests is projected to be nearly stable over the 25-year pe-
Wildlife parks and protected area
riod at 8.79 GtC (Figure 6 a). When afforestation and
In India, 15.6 mha is Protected Area, where all human in-
reforestation is included, the carbon stock is projected to
tervention or extraction is banned.
increase from 8.79 GtC in 2006 to 9.75 GtC by 2030,
about 11% increase (Figure 6 a). It is important to note
that COMAP model accounts for harvests and the result- Afforestation
ing emissions. Thus, Indian forests will be a net sink over
the next 25 years. Figure 6 b shows the dominance of soil India has been implementing large-scale afforestation/
carbon in the total forest carbon stock. reforestation since 1980 under social forestry, Joint Forest

CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 95, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2008 219

RESEARCH ARTICLES

Management, silvi-pasture, farm forestry and agro-forestry forest area per capita is only 0.06 ha, compared to the world
programmes, covering over 30 mha. This may have reduced average of 0.62 ha/capita and Asian average of 0.15 ha/
pressure on the forests. capita. A comparison of key developing countries and
Western European countries4 is provided in Table 2. For-
ests and wooded land area per 1000 population in Germany
National Forest Policy, 1988
and France is nearly two and five times that of India.
Similarly, forest and wooded land in other major develop-
It envisages people’s participation in the development and
ing countries such as Brazil, China and Indonesia are also
protection of forests. The basic objective of this policy is
higher by 3 to 40 times, as compared to India.
to maintain environmental stability through preservation
of forests as a natural heritage.
Low deforestation rate compared to other
Joint Forest Management (JFM), 1990 developing countries

The Forest Policy 1988 set the stage for participatory forest According to the Global Forest Resources Assessment4,
management in India. The JFM programme recognized countries such as India and China are experiencing an in-
the rights of the protecting communities over forest lands. crease in forest area since 1990 (Table 3). However, majo-
The local communities and the Forest Department jointly rity of the other tropical countries with large area under
plan and implement forest regeneration programmes and forests are experiencing deforestation on a significant
the communities are rewarded for their efforts in protection scale since 1990 (Table 3). Majority of the countries (42–
and management. The total area covered under the JFM 65%) are experiencing reduction in forest area or net de-
programme is over 15 mha. This has enabled protection forestation4 (Table 4).
of existing forests, regeneration of degraded forests and
raising of forest plantations, potentially contributing to
High dependence of human population on forests
conservation of existing forests and carbon stocks.
In India, nearly 196,000 villages are in the forests or on the
Significance of stabilization of forest carbon forest fringes. Fuelwood is a dominant source of cooking
stocks in India energy for the rural population with forests contributing
significantly to this. Apart from fuelwood, village commu-
India is one of the few countries in the world, particularly nities depend on forests for small timber, bamboo and non-
among the tropical countries, where carbon stock in forests timber forest products.
has stabilized or is projected to increase. This has impli-
cations for reducing the carbon emissions from forest sector,
High livestock density
potentially contributing to stabilization of CO2 concentra-
tion in the atmosphere. This Indian achievement is sig-
nificant due to the following. India accounts for 2.3% of the world’s geographic area,
but accounts for 15% of the global livestock population.
The cattle (cows, bullocks and buffaloes) population den-
High population density and low per capita sity is nearly one per hectare. When sheep and goats are
forest area included along with cattle, the livestock population den-
sity further increases to 1.5 per hectare. However, if only
India is a large developing country with a population forest land is considered, the livestock density is 7 per
density of 363 persons/km2. Even more significantly, the hectare, which is among the highest in the world.

Table 2. Comparison of total forest area and forest area/1000 population4

Total area under Forest and wooded

Population Forest area Other wooded forest and wooded land (ha/1000
Country (million) (‘000 ha) land (‘000 ha) land (‘000 ha) population)

India 1079 67,701 4110 71,811 66

China 1326 197,290 87,615 284,905 215
Brazil 178 477,698 0 477,698 2673
Indonesia 217 88,495 0 88,495 406
Germany 82 11,076 0 11,076 134
United Kingdom 59 2845 20 2865 48
France 59 15,554 1708 17,262 287

220 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 95, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2008

 RESEARCH ARTICLES
Table 3. Comparison of forest area change and deforestation (in ‘000 ha) in other major developing countries4

Net annual change in Area under forest Net annual change in

forest area (‘000 ha) (‘000 ha) forest area (‘000 ha)
Key developing
Region 1990 to 2000 2000 to 2005 countries 1990 2000 2005 1990–2000 2000–2005

Asia –792 1003 China 157,141 177,001 197,290 1986 4058

India 63,939 67,554 67,701 362 29
Indonesia 116,567 97,852 88,495 –1872 –1871
Malaysia 22,376 21,591 20,890 –78 –140
Philippines 10,574 7949 7162 –262 –157
Africa –4375 –4040 Sudan 76,381 70,491 67,546 –589 –589
Zambia 49,124 44,676 42,452 –445 –445
UR Tanzania 41,441 37,318 35,257 –412 –412
Nigeria 17,234 13,137 11,089 –410 –410
South Africa 9203 9203 9203 0 0
South America –3802 –4251 Brazil 520,027 493,213 477,698 –2681 –3103
Argentina 35,262 33,770 33,021 –149 –150
Mexico 69,016 65,540 64,238 –348 –260
Peru 70,156 69,213 68,742 –94 –94
Columbia 61,439 60,963 60,728 –48 –47

Table 4. Countries with positive, negative and zero or marginal annual rate of change in forest area4

Countries with negative Countries with positive Countries with zero net Countries with no
Total number rate of net annual change rate of net annual change annual change in forest significant net annual change
Region of countries in forest area (2000–05) in forest area (2000–05) area (2000–05) in forest area (2000–05)

Asia 48 20 13 12 3
Africa 58 38 8 8 4
South America 15 8 2 3 2 (not available)

Dominance of agrarian economy trend scenario indicate that the forest cover is likely to
increase in the period 2006–30. Further, model-based
Rural areas in India are characterized by large depend- projections of carbon stocks in the Indian forest sector
ence of the population on land resources, particularly show a likely increase (from 8.79 GtC in 2005 to 9.75 GtC
cropland and forest land, leading to more human pressure in 2030). This is a significant achievement for a develop-
on land. ing country such as India, despite high human and live-
stock population density, high dependence of rural
communities on forests for biomass resources and low per
Implications of Indian forest conservation and capita forest area. The factors contributing to the current
development programmes and policies for global and projected trends of stable or increasing carbon stocks
change in the forests are progressive and effective forest conser-
vation legislations, afforestation and reforestation pro-
India is a large developing country with a high population grammes and community participation in forest protection,
density and low forest area per capita. The livestock regeneration and management.
population density is among the highest in the world. Fur- The progressive conservation-oriented forest policies
ther, nearly 70% of the population residing in rural areas and afforestation programmes are contributing to reduc-
depends on forest and other biomass resources for fuel- tion in CO2 emissions to the atmosphere, stabilization of
wood, timber and non-timber forest products for its en- carbon stocks in forests and conservation of biodiversity.
ergy needs and livelihood. In such a socio-economic Thus, the Indian forest sector is projected to keep making
scenario, one would have expected the forest area to decline, positive contributions to global change and sustainable
leading to large emissions of CO2 from the forest sector. development. This projected estimate and conclusion ex-
The analysis of forest cover, afforestation and refores- cludes any potential decline in forest carbon stocks due to
tation has shown that the forest cover has stabilized in the forest conversion, forest degradation, biomass extraction,
past 15 years (64–67 mha). Projections under the current fire, etc.

CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 95, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2008 221

RESEARCH ARTICLES
14. Ravindranath, N. H. et al., Methodological Issues in forestry miti-
1. Ministry of Environment and Forests, India’s Initial National
gation projects: A case study of Kolar district. Miti. Adap. Strat.
Communication to UNFCCC (NATCOM), New Delhi, 2004;
Global Change, 2007, 12, 1077–1098.
available at http://www.natcomindia.org/natcomreport.htm
15. Ravindranath, N. H., Sudha, P. and Sandhya, R., Forestry for sus-
2. http://envfor.nic.in/nfap/, accessed on 11 July 2007.
tainable biomass production and carbon sequestration in India.
3. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 2003, Ministry of
Miti. Adap. Strat. Global Change, 2001, 6, 233–256.
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
16. Richards, J. F. and Flint, E. P., Historic land use and carbon esti-
4. FAO, State of the World’s Forests, Rome, 2005.
mates for South and Southeast Asia 1880–1980. ORNL/CDIAC-
5. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 1987, Ministry of
61, NDP-046, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA,
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
1994.
6. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 2001, Ministry of
17. Ravindranath, N. H., Somashekhar, B. S. and Gadgil, M., Carbon
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
flows in Indian forests. Climate Change, 1997, 35, 297–320.
7. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 1989, Ministry of
18. Chhabra, A. and Dadhwal, V. K., Assessment of major pools and
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
fluxes of carbon in Indian forests. Climate Change, 2004, 64, 341–
8. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 1991, Ministry of
360.
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
19. Haripriya, G. S., Carbon budget of the Indian forest ecosystem. Cli-
9. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 1993, Ministry of
mate Change, 2003, 56, 291–319.
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
10. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 1995, Ministry of
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We thank the MOEF, GOI for supporting
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
this project as well as climate change research activities at the Centre
11. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 1997, Ministry of
for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. We
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
also thank Jayant Sathaye and Ken Andrasko for their support in our
12. Forest Survey of India, State of Forest Report 1999, Ministry of
climate change research over the years.
Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun.
13. Sathaye, J. and Meyers, S., Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Assess-
ment: A Guidebook, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995. Received 12 July 2007; revised accepted 22 May 2008

Erratum
Sago starch: An economical substitute for in vitro primary screening of starch utilizing microorganisms
R. B. Binky, R. Saikiran, S. Tushar, P. Umesh, J. Yogesh and A. N. Syed
[Curr. Sci., 2007, 93, 459–461]

Line 1, para 2, 2nd column should have been:

1. Successful use of isabgol derived from Plantago ovata seeds, gum katira exuded from Cochlospermum religiosum
bark and guar gum from endosperm of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba as gelling agent has been reported for microbial
culture media3,6,7.
2. Nene, Z. L. in ref. 6 should have been Nene, Y. L.

We regret the error.

—Authors

222 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 95, NO. 2, 25 JULY 2008