An1049 Application Note
An1049 Application Note
An1049 Application Note
® APPLICATION NOTE
MINIMIZE POWER LOSSES OF LIGHTLY LOADED FLYBACK
CONVERTERS WITH THE L5991 PWM CONTROLLER
by Claudio Adragna
The L5991 PWM controller is particularly suitable for SMPS of equipment that must comply with
standards concerning energy saving. The device, optimized for flyback topology, monitors the power
demanded by the load and changes the operating frequency of the converter accordingly: high fre-
quency at heavy load, low frequency at light load.
In this way, power losses dependent on frequency are reduced at light load maintaining, at the same
time, the advantages offered by a high switching frequency at heavy load.
The frequency reduction is very helpful but is not the only means needed to minimize power losses.
This note surveys the above mentioned functionality of the L5991 (called "Standby" function) as well
as the most significant points to consider in order to achieve the goal of a very efficient lightly loaded
flyback.
INTRODUCTION
The minimization of the power drawn from the mains under light load conditions (Standby, Suspend or
some other idle mode) is an issue that is recently becoming of great interest, above all else because
new and more severe standards are coming into force.
This is already well-established in the area of computer monitors, where norms define precisely the vari-
ous idle modes and the relevant maximum consumption admitted, but more and more often power sup-
plies for other pieces of office equipment (i.e. printers, photocopiers, fax machines, AC-DC adaptors,
etc.), are required to accomplish with specifications concerning energy saving.
Figure 1. L5991 Internal Block Diagram
1 15 8 4
RCT 2
TIMING
Vref
+ 21V
3 + PWM
DC -
T 10V -
UVLO
14 9
DIS - DIS VC
+
VREF
2.5V
STANDBY 17V 10
OUT
ST-BY 16 BLANKING
S Q
R
PWM
VREF
OVER OK
CURRENT CLK 11
13 DIS PGND
FAULT
ISEN +
SOFT-START
-
1.2V
SS 5
7 - VFB
E/A 2.5V
2R + + STANDBY
1V R 2.5/4.0V
-
12 6
SGND COMP
Anyway, minimizing the power wasted by a lightly loaded switch-mode converter is a demanding chal-
lenge for power supply designers and, to achieve the goal, an appropriate design strategy is required.
The key point of this strategy is a low switching frequency. It is well-known that many of the power loss
sources in a lightly loaded flyback waste energy proportionally to the switching frequency, hence this
should be reduced as much as possible. On the other hand, it is equally well-known that a low switching
frequency leads to bigger and heavier magnetics and makes filtering more troublesome.
It is then desirable to make the system operate at high frequency under nominal load condition and to
reduce the frequency when the system works in a low-consumption mode. This requires a special func-
tionality of the controller: it should be able to recognize automatically the condition of light or heavy load
and should adequate its operating frequency accordingly.
The L5991 PWM controller, with its "Standby function", meets exactly this requirement. The function is
optimized for flyback topology: in fact, power supply of office equipment lies most often in the medium-
low power range, where flyback topology features the lowest cost/performance ratio and is, therefore,
the favorite one.
However, the goal of power losses minimization cannot be achieved with only a simple reduction of the
switching frequency. Although the most important, this is only one of the numerous points of a wide-
ranging strategy that must be looked into on the whole.
This application note is composed of two distinct parts. The first part deals with the L5991, describes the
operation of the "Standby function" in detail and states several relationships useful for the design. The
second one provides an overview of the points to be considered in the above mentioned strategy, as
well as a number of tips that can be helpful.
2/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
The L5991 can be used in off-line SMPS’ with any single-ended topology. However, its features make
the device particularly useful for power supplies based on flyback topology for office equipment that
must comply with standards concerning energy saving. Monitor displays, printers, photocopiers, scan-
ners and fax machines are the most noticeable examples.
COMP ISEN
6 13
+
2R - R DRIVER CUT
STANDBY
10V 4
5
FB - + VREF
STANDBY
+ - HIGH
2.5
2.5/4 ST-BY
LEVEL SHIFT
16
STANDBY BLOCK
LOW
RB RA VT1 VT2 VCOMP
2.6V 4V
66KΩ
2
RCT
CT
D97IN752A
The oscillation frequency can be estimated with the following approximate relationships:
1
fosc ≈ (1),
CT ⋅ (0.693 ⋅ (RA ⁄ ⁄ RB) + KT)
3/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
which gives the standby operating frequency, that is the one the converter will operate at when lightly
loaded. In the above expressions, RA // RB means:
RA ⋅ RB
RA ⁄ ⁄ RB = (3),
RA + RB
It is more convenient to refer to the thresholds Vcspk1 and Vcspk2 (rather than VT1 and VT2), because they
can be immediately related to the peak input current. Although having fixed thresholds may seem a lack
of flexibility, in reality it is possible to adjust the thresholds in terms of input power level, if needed, by
adding a DC offset voltage (VO) on the current sense pin.
Vcspk1 − Vo 0.367 − Vo
Ippk1 = = (7),
Rs Rs
corresponding to the standby input power which, under the assumption of DCM (Discontinuous Conduc-
tion Mode) operation, can be expressed as:
2
1 0.367 − Vo
PinSB = ⋅ Lp ⋅ fosc ⋅ (8).
2 Rs
The standby power can be expressed also in terms of the maximum input power (Pinmax). This is set by
the sense resistor Rs, which is selected so as to limit the peak primary current at the value (Ippkmax) rele-
vant to Pinmax:
Rs =
1 − Vo
Ippkmax
= (1 − Vo) ⋅
√
Lp ⋅ fosc
2 ⋅ Pinmax
(9).
4/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Provided equation (12) is fulfilled, the input power (PinNW) at which the normal operation frequency is re-
sumed (fSB ⇒ fosc) will be:
2
1 0.867 − Vo
PinNW = ⋅ Lp ⋅ fSB ⋅ (13)
2 Rs
which, considering position (9), can be also expressed in the following terms:
2 2
0.867 − Vo fSB 0.867 − Vo fSB
PinNW = Pinmax ⋅ ⋅ f = PinSB ⋅ 0.367 V ⋅ f (14).
1 − Vo osc − o osc
Figure 4. Circuit for the adjustment of the The inspection of equations (8)...(14) shows that
standby thresholds. adding an offset Vo lowers the ratios PinSB/Pinmax
and PinNW / Pinmax and raises the limit of fosc / fSB
R (with respect to the values with Vo = 0).
Vo = Vref
R + Rc
This is equivalent to lowering the internal thresholds
Vref VT1 and VT2. The effect will be more pronunciated
on VT1 than on VT2. In practice, the internal thresh-
4
10
olds have been fixed at the maximum value able to
allow high enough a frequency jump, with a certain
L5991 Rc
margin, leaving to an external circuit (like the one
R
shown in fig. 4) the duty of the adjustment, if neces-
12 11 13
sary.
C
Rs Referring now to MCM (Mixed Conduction Mode) and
CCM (Continuous Conduction Mode) systems, the
peak voltage on the current sense pin is given by:
Pin VE
Vo + Rs ⋅ VE + 2 ⋅ ZE Pin > PinT
Vcspk = (15)
V + R ⋅
o s
√
2 ⋅ Pin
ZE
Pin > PinT
where ZE is to be evaluated at fsw = fosc or fsw = fSB, depending on the operating mode. At the transition
CCM ↔ DCM the peak voltage on the current sense pin will be:
VE
VcspkT = Vo + Rs ⋅ (16).
ZE
5/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
1 − Vo 1 − Vo
Rs = = (17).
Ippkmax Pinmax VEmin
+
VEmin 2 ⋅ ZE
(with ZE evaluated at fsw = fosc), the peak voltage on the current sense pin at transition will be given by:
VE 2 ⋅ PinT
VcspkT = Vo + (1 − Vo) ⋅ ⋅ (18),
VEmin Pinmax + PinTmin
(with PinT and PinTmin evaluated at fsw = fosc). It will assume its minimum value at minimum mains volt-
age (that is, @ VE = VEmin ⇒ PinT = PinTmin):
2
VcspkTmin = Vo + (1 − Vo) ⋅ (19).
Pinmax
1+
PinTmin
Table A2 in appendix shows that in MCM systems (for which PinTmin ≤ Pinmax ≤ PinTmax) the ratio PinTmax /
PinTmin does not exceed 3.31 in practical cases. This means that also Pinmax /PinTmin will not exceed 3.31.
As a result, the transition from CCM to DCM will occur at Vcspk values that do not exceed 2 / (1+3.31) =
464 mV (when Vo = 0, and even larger values when Vo > 0).
In the end, since Vcspk1 = 367 mV, when the L5991 activates the standby frequency MCM systems are
operating in DCM. The standby input power will then be found once more from equation (8) which, ac-
counting for (17) and after some manipulations, yields:
2 2
PinSB 1 0.367 − Vo Pinmax PinTmin
= ⋅ ⋅ 1+ ⋅
Pinmax 4 1 − Vo PinTmin Pinmax
(20).
Besides, all the considerations leading to equation (12), as well as equation (12), still apply. This will al-
ways be true if VcspkTmin is greater than Vcspk1, that is if the ratio Pinmax /PinTmin is such that:
Pinmax 1.633 − Vo
≤ (21)
PinTmin 0.367 − Vo
(= 4.45 for Vo = 0), which includes also a class of CCM systems. In practice, the above equations apply
to the large majority of common flyback designs.
Once the system is in standby mode, in equations (15) ZE must be evaluated for fsw = fSB, becoming
ZE’. This will modify also PinT, PinTmin and VcspkT: they all increase and become PinT’, PinTmin’ and VcspkT’
respectively.
When Vcspk =Vcspk2, that is when the input power is PinNW and the frequency is to be switched back to
fosc, the system can be working either in DCM or CCM, depending on the fosc / fSB ratio and on VE (that
is, on the input voltage). In other words, it depends on whether VcspkT’ is greater or less than Vcspk2. It is
possible to find that if the following condition:
is fulfilled, then VcspkT’ >Vcspk2 and the system will be working in DCM.
The right side of (22), for Vo = 0, is top limited at 1.87 in MCM systems. Considering that in most practi-
cal cases the fosc / fSB ratio will not be less than 2, it is possible to leave out the case of CCM operation.
This makes things easier because there would be also a dependence of PinNW on VE.
In the end, PinNW will be given again by equation (13) which, rearranged more conveniently, becomes:
2 2
PinNW 1 0.867 − Vo Pinmax PinTmin fSB
= ⋅ ⋅ 1+ ⋅ ⋅
Pinmax 4 1 − Vo PinTmin Pinmax fosc
(23)
6/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
The inspection of equations (15)...(23) shows that also in MCM systems the effect of the offset Vo is the
same as in DCM systems. Furthermore, the internal thresholds VT1 and VT2 are such that a large range
of applications can be covered without any external adjustment.
Standby function setup Figure 5. PinSB /Pinmax ratio vs. DC offset on current
It is difficult to outline a general procedure sense.
for the use of the L5991’s standby function
20
because the constraints of a specific design
may be of different types and are not known KM = 3 Pinmax
KM =
in advance. It is possible, however, to pro- KM = 2.5 KM = 2 PinTmin
vide some diagrams that summarize the 15
Pinmax
KM = (24).
PinTmin 0
0 50 100 150 200
even more). Q( 0 , 3 , z )
fosc
z
up the value of VEmin relevant to the fSB
specification value and calculate IppkTmin:
50
VEmin VEmin
IppkTmin = =
Lp ⋅ fosc
Vo = 200 mV
ZE KM = 3
40
If the resulting value is greater than 1/Rs Q( 200 , 1 , z ) KM = 2.5 KM = 2
then the system will be DCM, otherwise
Q( 200 , 1.5 , z)
MCM. PinNW KM = 1.5
Q( 200 , 2 , z )% 30
Pinmax
2. Calculate Pinmax. If the system is DCM Q( 200 , 2.5 , z) KM ≤ 1
use the following equation: Q( 200 , 3 , z )
2
1 1
Pinmax = ⋅ Lp ⋅ ⋅ fosc (DCM)
20
2 Rs
otherwise use:
10
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
VEmin V2Emin z
fosc
Pinmax = − (MCM). fSB
Rs 2 ⋅ Lp ⋅ fosc
7/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
3. Calculate PinTmin :
V2Emin
PinTmin =
2 ⋅ Lp ⋅ fosc
8/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Vac
R START
8 C SUPPLY
L5991
12
a)
Vac
1N4148
RSTART
8 CSUPPLY
L5991
12
b)
Vac
33 kΩ
2 MΩ
STD2N50-1
20 V
8 Csupply
4
L5991
47 kΩ
12
c)
9/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Table2. Consumption of the start-up circuits of fig. 7 for 1s wake-up time (@ VACmin).
UC3842A 47µF a) 110 110 270 220 250 580 110 110 1170
As to the self-supply circuit, usually it develops the voltage VCC (obviously greater than VTHOFF) by recti-
fying and filtering the voltage generated by an auxiliary winding of the flyback transformer (see fig. 7).
The power delivered by such circuit amounts at:
10/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
where VF is the forward drop on the rectifier, Iq is the quiescent current of the IC, IGD the average current
delivered to the gate of the MOSFET by the driver output (see "Power MOSFET") and Iext the current
consumption of some other circuitry powered by the self-supply circuit.
Table 3. Consumption of the self-supply circuit for different IC’s.
Table 3 summarizes a comparison concerning the power demanded to the self-supply circuit under light
load conditions by different IC’s. In addition to those considered in table 1 and 2, table 3 includes also
the L5991A, the version of L5991 with VTH = 9V (max.) and a minimum operating voltage of 8.2V (max.).
The table assumes IGD =2mA for L5991, L5991A (due to their standby function) and IGD =5mA for the
UC384XA/B, Iext = 0, VCC =15V (9V for L5991A), VF = 0.6V and maximum Iq.
If the start-up circuit is (a) or (b), a low VCC will cause higher power to be dissipated in RSTART, but will
also lead to a lower PSS. In practical cases, the contribution of VCC to PSS is prevailing thus the total
power consumption PSTART + PSS will be lower at low VCC.
If the start-up circuit is (c) a low VCC requires the use of the NPN transistor and the 47 kΩ resistor to turn
off the start-up MOS, but is definitely advantageous in terms of consumption. As a result, it is advisable
to keep VCC as low as possible whatever start-up circuit is used.
As to this concept, the L5991A is particularly advantageous. The undervoltage lockout hysteresis, how-
ever, is small (9 - 8.2 = 0.8 V) and this calls for a bigger CSUPPLY which, in turn, requires a lower RSTART
for the same wake-up time. As a result, PSTART will be considerably higher.
Power MOSFET
The incidence of the MOSFET on power losses at light load depends basically on the switching fre-
quency. Leaving out conduction losses, which can be neglected in this context, the power dissipation
due to the MOSFET under light load conditions consists of three contributions:
1 -Turn-on losses, due to the discharge of the total capacitance of the drain node inside the MOSFET. It
is possible to separate two different contributions to the total drain capacitance (CDrain): Coss, the in-
ternal capacitance of the MOSFET, modulated by the drain voltage (manufacturers specify the value
@ VDS = 25V), and CDext, the external parasitic capacitance due to the transformer and to the layout
of the circuit. In practice, it is possible to estimate CDrain from the drain voltage oscillation occuring af-
ter the secondary current has run dry in DCM operation (see fig. 9). In fact, when the transformer is
discharged, the primary inductance starts resonating with CDrain and the oscillation period is:
TRES ≈ 2π ⋅ √
Lp ⋅ CDrain (26).
Turn-on losses depend on the input voltage in a non-monotonic way. As shown in fig. 9, the value of the
drain voltage at turn-on (VDon) in DCM operation is affected by the above mentioned oscillation. An input
voltage increase, despite raising the settling value of the oscillation, may lead to a lower value at turn-on
because of a particular combination of TON, TFW, TDEAD and TRES.
2 -Turn-off losses, due to the crossing of the active region that causes a voltage-current overlapping, as
shown schematically in figure 10. The fall time (Tf) of a given MOSFET depends on the driver capa-
bility (1.6A peak) and can be controlled with a series resistor placed between pin 10 and the gate of
the MOSFET.
The parasitic inductances (basically, the one located between source and ground) limit the maximum
di/dt rate achievable. The rate of rise of VDS depends mainly on CDrain.
3 - Gate drive losses, related to the charge to be delivered to the gate each time the MOSFET is turned on.
This charge, supplied at fSB rate, results in an equivalent DC current IGD. The parameter to be consid-
ered is the total gate charge (Qg) of the device, evaluated at the gate voltage delivered by the L5991.
11/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
VDS TRES
VR
VAC1
VR
VAC2
VDS
Ippk Vspike
0.9 Ippk
Vin + VR
0.1 Ippk
Tf
Unlike the two prior contributions, gate drive losses are not wasted inside the MOSFET (except
for a very small amount), but in the output stage of the L5991 and on the series gate resistor. The
current IGD is seen as an additional current consumption that is added to the quiescent current of the
L5991 (see equation 25).
The appendix "Light load losses evaluation" helps estimate the above mentioned contributions.
When selecting the MOSFET, the parameters to look at are the voltage rating V(BR)DSS, the on-state re-
sistance RDS(on), (this only as to full load considerations), the total gate charge Qg and the parasitic ca-
pacitances Ciss, Crss and Coss.
The RDS(on) should be "just what needed": low enough to reduce resistive losses at full load but not too
low since Qg, Ciss, Crss and Coss build up as RDS(on) decreases. It must not sound surprising to give up
some efficiency points at high load in favor of an improvement at light load if that is worth it.
The voltage rating of the device should be the lowest possible. In fact, for a given RDS(on), the lower the
V(BR)DSS is, the lower the total gate charge Qg and the parasitic capacitance. A 110 V application should
use a 400V device, a 220V or wide-range application a 600V device. The transformer plays a significant
role as to this point (see "Transformer").
12/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Last, but not least significant, the technology. A good technology device offers lower gate charge and
parasitic capacitances with the same V(BR)DSS, and RDS(on).
Transformer.
The design and the assembly of the transformer plays a significant role in the process of power losses
minimization. The most annoying parasitic is the so-called "leakage inductance", that represents the
stray primary magnetic flux, modeled as an inductor in series with the primary and not coupled to the
secondary. The energy stored in the leakage inductance produces an overvoltage spike on the drain of
the MOSFET at turn-off. An external circuit will be necessary to clamp this spike so that the voltage rat-
ing of the MOSFET is never exceeded.
Therefore, when designing and building a transformer with the aim of optimizing the efficiency of the
converter at light load, the priorities are basically three:
a) make the leakage inductance as low as possible. In terms of efficiency, there is a double noxious ef-
fect due to the leakage inductance. It not only dumps its own energy into the clamp circuit but also
delays energy transfer from primary to secondary, after MOSFET turn-off, until it has run out of en-
ergy. The result is that the energy stored in the mutual inductance is not completely transferred to the
secondary and is partly diverted into the clamp circuit and partly dissipated in the resistance of the
primary winding. This inefficiency is worsened by a light load and a high input voltage: both reduce
the primary peak current and also the voltage across the leakage inductance (the leakage inductance
spike) that resets the inductance itself. The lower this voltage is, the more energy transfer is delayed
and the less energy is brought to the secondary.
In practice, besides improving the energy transfer, a low leakage inductance will allow to lighten the
action of the external clamp and/or to select a lower voltage rating MOSFET. This will be beneficial to
efficiency at heavy load as well.
In order for a transformer to meet isolation and safety regulations, primary and secondary windings
must be separated by isolation layers, thus their coupling cannot be intimate. As a result, it is not pos-
sible to reduce leakage inductance below a certain extent. Practically, for a well assembled trans-
former, leakage inductance will be about 1÷3% of the primary inductance.
air gap on
centre leg
Interleaved windings technique (putting on half the primary turns first, then all the secondaries and fi-
nally the other half of the primary; see fig. 11) can reduce leakage inductance by 50%. The two pri-
mary halves must be series connected, never paralleled.
In general, multifilar winding technique (twisting the wire of two or more windings together) gives
maximum coupling between windings. In off-line converters, however, this technique is usually appli-
cable only to secondary windings to get good cross-regulation, in case of multiple output. When multi-
filar winding technique is not practicable because of very different turns number (or wire size), the
secondary winding with the highest output power should be wound closest to the primary; for the
same power the lowest voltage should be given priority.
Other tricks, such as spacing windings evenly across a layer (when they do not completely fill it), or
using multiple strands of wire, or keeping isolation between windings to a minimum are also effective
13/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Clamp network.
Typically, the voltage spike due to transformer’s leakage inductance is limited by an RCD clamp (see fig.
12a). Its action should be very light so as to have a spike as large as possible, consistently with the need
of never exceeding the voltage rating of the MOSFET. This will optimize energy transfer from primary to
secondary. A low leakage inductance of the transformer is, of course, extremely helpful.
RCD clamps dissipate power even under no-load conditions: there is always the reflected voltage across
the clamp resistor (R). To reduce clamp losses to a negligible level at light load, the use of a zener
clamp (see fig. 12b) is recommended whenever possible. Such a circuit gives also a well defined clamp-
ing level but, on the other hand, dissipates more power at full load. Its use is therefore limited to low
power applications.
An alternative to these solutions can be the use of a non-dissipative clamp like the LCD one shown in
fig. 12c, which helps also reduce turn-off losses in the MOSFET. This circuit recovers the majority of the
leakage inductance energy by transferring it back onto the input voltage rail through C and D2. There is
just a little power dissipation on the two diodes and the inductor. However, there is a slight increase of
the conduction losses in the MOSFET at heavy load and, besides, the circuit is quite expensive and not
easy to optimise.
Figure 12. Possible clamp circuit topologies.
C R
D2
DZ
C
D D
D1
a) b) b)
14/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Whatever the clamp circuit topology is, the selection of the components is not trivial but needs special
care to avoid annoying problems.
The capacitors should be low-loss type (with polypropylene or polystyrene film dielectric) to reduce
power dissipation and prevent overheating due to the high peak currents they experience.
The blocking diodes must be not only very fast-recovery but also very fast-turn-on type. They should be
rated for repetitive peak currents greater than Ippk and their voltage rating must be adequate but not
much higher than necessary. For a given diode type, the higher its breakdown voltage is, the longer its
turn-on time will be. This leads to higher turn-on losses and larger overvoltage spikes, extending above
the clamp level, on the MOSFET’s drain.
The zener diode must have an adequate power handling capability in both transient and steady state op-
eration. The zener voltage should be approximately 50% higher than the reflected voltage so as not to
have too high power dissipation at heavy load. A transient voltage suppressor (Transil) can be effectively
used in place of zener diodes. Table 4 lists some recommended devices available from ST: BZV and
1N53xx types are zener diodes, all the others are Transil. SM15Txx devices are for surface mount as-
semblies.
Miscellaneous.
There are some other hidden losses that can be significant under light load conditions and that could be
worth reducing. At least, the designer should be aware of them.
- Dummy load. Sometimes a minimum load current is required to maintain regulation and to prevent the
output voltage from drifting high. A ballast resistor capable of sinking this minimum amount of current
is usually placed at the output, so that the external load can be disconnected without any output volt-
age drift. Obviously, this resistor dissipates a constant amount of power that degrades efficiency, es-
pecially at light load, and should be removed if possible or at least minimized. The frequency reduc-
tion offered by the L5991 helps to this end.
- Feedback. The resistor divider of the feedback network (including typically an optocoupler with a volt-
age reference/error amplifier like the TL431) absorbs some mA, thus representing a dummy load that
adds to the actual one. If possible, the feedback network should be connected to the lowest output
voltage of the converter.
- Residual resistive losses. Although currents involved at light load are very low, some residual "RI2 "
losses are still present. They are mainly located in the bridge rectifier, in the inrush current limiter, in
the output steering diode and in the transformer, both as ohmic losses and radiation losses. Consider
also that the converter is drawing very little input (real) power but much higher (up to 4-5 times) ap-
parent power and that the RMS currents circulating upstream the input bulk capacitor are related to
the apparent power.
- Case-to-heatsink parasitic capacitor. Due to the capacitive coupling of the MOSFET’s package (typi-
cally, 15-20 pF for a TO220 case) to the heatsink (which is grounded for RFI reasons), current is by-
passed from the drain to ground. This current does not usually generate heat but represents a
dummy load. If necessary, it is possible to minimize this loss by interposing a separator, between the
package and the heatsink, made up of an insulating material with a metal foil embedded in it. This
halves the capacitance and therefore the current. Moreover, the foil may be a point from which a little
energy can be drawn for biasing some low consumption circuit.
- RC damping networks. They are commonly used to damp ringings that generate EMI and may be lo-
cated at both the primary and the secondary side. Damping is inherently dissipative, hence these RC
networks should be removed. Reduction of switching speed of the MOSFET, careful PCB layout, ap-
propriate transformer construction and selection of EMI filter components may make damping unnec-
essary.
15/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Experimental results
In order to validate the above considerations, an experimental example will be given. It concerns a 40W,
wide-range mains power supply for an inkjet printer, whose design has been optimized following some of
the guidelines here presented, and evaluated on the bench.
Fig. 13 shows the schematic with indication of the relevant parts. The 28V output powers the stepper
motors while the 12V output supplies the printhead. When the printer is idle these two outputs are not
loaded. The 5V section supplies the logic circuits as well as the µcontroller that must be operating also
when the system is idle.
The system operates at 100 kHz at nominal load. This value is set by the parallel of the 22 kΩ and the
5.6 kΩ resistors connected at pin 2, along with the 3.3 nF capacitor placed between pin 2 and ground.
When the output load is decreased so that the input power falls below about 8W, the output of the error
amplifier crosses the lower threshold (VT1) of the internal comparator. The L5991 now disconnects inter-
nally the 5.6 kΩ resistor, so that the capacitor is charged through the 22 kΩ resistor only and the oscilla-
tor frequency is changed to about 20 kHz.
Figure 13. 40W Power Supply for inkjet printers. Electrical schematic
5.6K
0.1µF 33 µF / 25V
15 14 9 8
4
5.6K
22K 3 22
10 STP4NA60
2
3.3 nF 16 1K
L5991 13
5.6K 0.47
1 470pF 1/2 W
12
220 1K
11
7 470
6 4N35
330 nF 5
470pF
The system works in standby at 20 kHz as long as the input power does not exceed about 9 W. When
the load current increases and this power is exceeded, the output of the error amplifier overcomes the
upper threshold (VT2) and the L5991 connects again the 5.6kΩ resistor, thus switching the oscillator fre-
quency back to 100 kHz.
16/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
The target was to draw from the line less than 2W over the entire input voltage range with the 28V and
12V outputs unloaded and with the minimum load (0.55 W) on the 5V section. The results of the evalu-
ation are summarized in table 5.
APPENDIX
Flyback Basics
Flyback’s operation takes place in a two-step process. During the ON time of the switch, energy is taken
from the input and stored in the primary of the flyback transformer (actually, two coupled inductors). At
the secondary side, the catch diode is reverse-biased, thus the load is being supplied by the energy
stored in the output bulk capacitor.
Figure A1. Flyback Topology with peak current mode control and associated waveforms
Vin
Vac
Is
Vout
Lp
VOLTAGE CLOCK
REFERENCE Vc/3
ERROR PWM Vdrain
AMPLIFIER COMPARATOR
+ 2R S
-
- R Q DRIVER
1V
R + Ip
VCOMP Vc
LATCH
Vcs
Rs
CONTROLLER
ISOLATED
FEEDBACK
Q Q Q
Is Is Is
17/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
When the switch turns off, the primary circuit is open and the energy stored in the primary is transferred
to the secondary by magnetic coupling. The catch diode is forward-biased, and the energy is delivered
to the output capacitor and to the load (recirculation). The output voltage is reflected back to the primary
through the turns ratio and adds up to the input voltage (typically, the filtered rectified mains), giving ori-
gin to a much higher voltage on the drain of the MOSFET.
Flyback topology is operating in DCM (Discontinuous Conduction Mode) when the input -or primary -
current starts from zero at the beginning of a given switching cycle. This happens because the secon-
dary of the transformer has discharged all the energy stored in the previous period. If this energy trans-
fer is not complete, then the primary current will start from a value greater than zero at the beginning of
each cycle. Then the flyback is said to be operating in CCM (Continuous Conduction Mode). DCM is
characterized by currents shaped in a triangular fashion, whereas CCM features trapezoidal currents
(see fig. A1).
The boundary between these two types of operation depends on several parameters. Some of them are
structural, that is parameters that identify the flyback converter: inductance of the primary of the trans-
former, transformer turns ratio and regulated output voltage. Others are related to the external world and
are subject to changes: input voltage and output load. The switching frequency is usually a structural pa-
rameter, unless it is synchronized to an external signal.
As to flyback topology operating in DCM, the relationship between the peak input current (Ippk) and the
input power (Pin) is:
Ippk(DCM) = √
2 ⋅ Pin
Lp ⋅ fsw
(A1).
where Lp is the inductance of the primary of the transformer and fsw the switching frequency.
The point is: in a given flyback, when operating in DCM, the peak input current depends solely on the
power drawn from the input.
The conduction time (TON, during which the MOSFET is ON) and the recirculation time (TFW, during
which the MOSFET is OFF and the catch diode is conducting) are respectively:
Lp ⋅ Ippk(DCM) Ippk(DCM)
TON = ; TFW = Lp ⋅ (A2)
Vin n ⋅ (Vout + VF)
where Vin is the DC input voltage and n the primary-to-secondary turns ratio, Vout the regulated output
voltage and VF the forward drop across the catch diode.
The quantity n • (Vout + VF) is the voltage reflected back to the primary during the recirculation at the
secondary. In the following will be indicated with VR:
Under the assumption of DCM, the sum of TON and TFW is less than the switching period T=1 / fsw. The
transition between DCM and CCM implies:
and, by combining equations (A1), (A2), (A3) in (A4), it is possible to determine the "Transition Power"
(PinT), that is the maximum input power at which a given flyback works in DCM (or rather the minimum
input power at which it works in CCM) for a given input voltage (and a given switching frequency, if this
can vary):
2
1 Vin
PinT = ⋅
Vin
(A5);
2 ⋅ fsw ⋅ Lp
1 +
VR
18/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
V2E
PinT = (A6)
2 ⋅ ZE
n• Vout
by defining the "Equivalent Input Voltage" (VE) and
the "Equivalent Primary Impedance" (ZE): VEmax
Vin
VE = ; ZE = fSW ⋅ Lp (A7). VEmin
Vin
1+
VR
Pin
VET = √
2 ⋅ ZE ⋅ Pin (A8).
DCM will take place for VE > VET and CCM for VE <
VET.
In synchronized converters it is possible to define VEmin VET VEmax VE
also the Transition Frequency (fT), that is the switch-
ing frequency at which the operation is on the
boundary between DCM and CCM, for a given VE and a given Pin:
V2E
fT = (A9).
2 ⋅ Lp ⋅ Pin
DCM will take place for fsw < fT and CCM for fsw > fT.
The peak primary current at transition is then:
Ippk(T) = √
2 ⋅ PinT
=
1
fSW ⋅ Lp fSW ⋅ Lp
⋅
Vin
=
VE
Vin ZE
(A9).
1+
VR
In case of CCM operation, equation (A4) still applies but the timing relationships (A2) change as follows:
Lp ⋅ ∆Ip Lp ⋅ ∆Ip
TON = ; TFW = T − TON = (A10),
Vin VR
where ∆Ip is the primary current ripple.
19/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
VR = 50V 33.3 ÷ 38.9 1.37 40.6 ÷ 44.0 1.18 33.3 ÷ 44.4 1.78
VR = 100V 50.0 ÷ 63.6 1.62 68.3 ÷ 78.7 1.33 50.0 ÷ 80.0 2.56
VR = 150V 60.0 ÷ 80.8 1.81 88.4 ÷ 106.7 1.46 60.0 ÷ 109.1 3.31
The peak primary current is no more uniquely related to Pin but now depends also on VE (i.e. Vin):
Pin T 1 Pin VE
Ippk(CCM) = ⋅ + ⋅ ∆Ip = + (A11).
Vin TON 2 VE 2 ⋅ ZE
It is possible to prove that Ippk is minimum when VE = VET for a given Pin (>PinTmin), that is at the transi-
tion, then it will be maximum for VE = VEmin (i.e. for Vin = Vinmin).
It is convenient to classify flyback converters on the basis of their maximum input power Pinmax:
Poutmax + Pextra
Pinmax = (A12),
η
being Poutmax their rated output power, Pextra some extra output power provided for transients or tempo-
rary overloads and η their efficiency, as follows:
Pinmax < PinTmin (⇒ VET < VEmin): DCM flyback;
PinTmin < Pinmax < PinTmax (⇒ VEmin < VET < VEmax): MCM (Mixed Conduction Mode) flyback ;
Pinmax > PinTmax (⇒ VET > VEmax): CCM flyback.
where Vf is the forward drop on each "zero duty cycle diode" (0.7V typ.) and Vo a DC offset voltage that
may be applied on the (-) input of the PWM comparator (that is on the current sense pin of the L5991).
VC, the voltage downstream the two zero duty cycle diodes (and applied on the x3 divider), despite not
really available, can be considered for convenience.
Considering the 1V clamp on the (+) input of the current sense comparator, VC will be included between
0 and 3 V, and the useful swing of VCOMP between 2 ⋅ Vf and 3 + 2 ⋅ Vf volt.
Actually, equation (B1) neglects the so-called "delay to output" of the PWM controller, that is the propa-
gation delay of the current sense path (PWM comparator + latch + driver). During this time, the switch is
still ON and the input current keeps on ramping up, despite Vcs has already hit the internal level on (-)
input of the PWM comparator.
This time lag (TDELAY, 70 ns typ. 100 ns max.) is compensated by the voltage loop when the system is
regulating: VCOMP is slightly lower than the value predicted by (B1) but the phase margin of the control
loop gain gets less. Instead, when the error amplifier is saturated high and the pulse-by-pulse limiting is
tripped, TDELAY causes the peak current Ippk to be larger than the expected limit 1 / Rs. As illustrated in
fig. B1, the effect is more pronunciated as the input voltage increases.
20/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Figure B1. Effect of the delay to output (a) and its compensation by means of Vo (b)
Ipx TDELAY
Vcs
∆Imax
VCOMP-2·Vf ∆Imin VCOMP -2·Vf VCLAMP
3 Rs 3 3
VCLAMP
3
Vomax
Vomin
a) b)
Vin
∆I = ⋅ TDELAY (B3).
Lp
Vin
Vo = V’o = Rs ⋅ ∆I = Rs ⋅ ⋅ TDELAY (B4),
Lp
the term ∆I and Vo in (B1) will cancel one the other Figure B2. Compensation of the delay to out-
and the effect of the delay to output is eliminated. put.
Equation (B1) will still apply, provided Vo is re-
garded as the difference between the actual voltage Vin
applied on the current sense pin of the L5991 and
the compensating value V’o.
The compensation can be easily realized with the
circuit shown in fig. B2. R2 is often used along with
the capacitor C to smooth the leading edge spikes
occurring when the switch turns on. In such a case R1
only R1 will be added.
Considering that V’o is in the hundred mV or less and
that, therefore, R1 >> R2 (R2 is typically 1kΩ, R1 will Vref
be in the MΩ), perfect delay compensation will be
achieved when the ratio of the two resistors is: 4
10
R2 TDELAY L5991 R3
= Rs ⋅ (B5). R2
R1 Lp
12 13
The resistor R3, connected to the 5V reference volt- C
Rs
age externally available on pin 4, is used for addi-
tional offsetting the voltage on the current sense
pin.
21/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
1 I2ppk ⋅ ⋅ fSB
T2f T2RES
≈ ⋅ CDrain ⋅ V2Don ⋅ fSB ≈ Qg ⋅ fSB ≈
2 6 ⋅ CDrain 4π2 ⋅ Lp
V2R
≈ ≈0 ≈0
R
22/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
SUMMARY
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
The L5991 .......................................................................................................................... 2
Standby Function Description............................................................................................. 3
Standby Operation Analysis ............................................................................................... 4
Standby Function Setup ..................................................................................................... 7
Standby Function and Error................................................................................................ 8
OPTIMISING THE DESIGN FOR MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY AT LIGHT LOAD
Start-up & Self-supply Circuits............................................................................................ 8
Power MOSFET ................................................................................................................. 11
Transformer ........................................................................................................................ 13
Clamp Network ................................................................................................................... 14
Miscellaneous..................................................................................................................... 15
Experimental Results.......................................................................................................... 16
APPENDIX
Flyback Basics.................................................................................................................... 17
Peak Current Mode Control Basics .................................................................................... 20
Light Load Losses Evaluation............................................................................................. 22
23/24
AN1049 APPLICATION NOTE
Information furnished is believed to be accurate and reliable. However, STMicroelectronics assumes no responsibility for the consequences
of use of such information nor for any infringement of patents or other rights of third parties which may result from its use. No license is
granted by implication or otherwise under any patent or patent rights of STMicroelectronics. Specification mentioned in this publication are
subject to change without notice. This publication supersedes and replaces all information previously supplied. STMicroelectronics products
are not authorized for use as critical components in life support devices or systems without express written approval of STMicroelectronics.
The ST logo is a registered trademark of STMicroelectronics
© 2000 STMicroelectronics – Printed in Italy – All Rights Reserved
STMicroelectronics GROUP OF COMPANIES
Australia - Brazil - China - Finland - France - Germany - Hong Kong - India - Italy - Japan - Malaysia - Malta - Morocco -
Singapore - Spain - Sweden - Switzerland - United Kingdom - U.S.A.
http://www.st.com
24/24