Demonstration Project of The Solar Hydrogen Energy System Located On Taleghan-Iran: Technical-Economic Assessments
Demonstration Project of The Solar Hydrogen Energy System Located On Taleghan-Iran: Technical-Economic Assessments
Demonstration Project of The Solar Hydrogen Energy System Located On Taleghan-Iran: Technical-Economic Assessments
+ = + =
(1)
The average annual global radiation for Taleghan region is 4.5 kWh/m
2
; Therefore power of
PV system in this pilot equal to:
kW kW
m Wh
days Wh
P
PV
10 88 . 9
/ 4500
/ 44500
2
= = (2)
The Depth of discharge (DOD) is defined as the amount of energy that has been removed
from a battery or battery pack and usually expressed as a percentage of the total capacity of
the battery. In this case, 30 % DOD means that 30 % of the energy has been discharged, so
the battery now holds only 70 % of its full charge [21]. In this pilot, we used type of sealed
lead acid with technical properties, 12 V and 100 Ah.
( ) Wh days Wh DOD 57850 ) ( 130 % 44500 capacity Bank / = = (3)
Ah 4820
12V
57850Wh
capacity Bank = =
(4)
48 2 . 48
100
4820
. = =
A
Ah
Battery No
(5)
3.3. Simulation solar hydrogen system with HOMER tools
National Renewable Energy Laboratorys software HOMER is used to select an optimum
energy system. It also performs sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of a change in one
or more of input parameters. Some required input information for HOMER are electrical
loads, renewable resources, component technical/costs, constraints, controls, type of dispatch
strategy, etc. [22]. The schematic of this system is shown in Fig. 3. Several simulation have
been made by considering different capacities of PV panels, hydrogen tank, electrolyzer,
battery bank, converter, fuel cell and primary load that the results of simulation, optimization
and analysis for this system are described in the following sections:
A cost of 342 $/45 W was used, resulting in a total capital cost of 76000 $ for a 10 kW PV
array. PV array operation and maintenance (O&M) cost is considered practically zero and
their lifetime is 20 years. After some preliminary runs with HOMER, it was decided that
the most suitable PV size to be considered was 10 kW.
A battery bank with a capacity of 1200 Ah (12 V, 100 A) per unit was installed. The total
capacity of batteries installed was 57.6 kWh and the estimated lifetime was 5 years. The
total capital cost of the battery bank was 4896 $. S izes of batteries considered in the
optimization were: 48 and 0 kWh (no batteries).
An AC-DC power converter unit has been installed in PV-Hydrogen system of Taleghan
site. Power conditioning capital cost is around 600-800 /kW [23]. A cost of 1350 $/ kW
was chosen for Taleghan site. A lifetime of 20 years was assumed and a converter
efficiency of >94%.
The cost of hydrogen production unit integrated to the proposed PV-hydrogen cost was
2700 $ per NmP
3
P/h HR
2
R. The introduction of this unit sizes (0-6.5 kW) was investigated with
HOMER. The lifetime of this unit was considered as equal to 10 years.
The capital cost of Nexa system (1.2 kW) is 5000 $/kW for the stand-alone energy system
in Taleghan site (because of its very small-scale). Fuel cell lifetime was 1500 operating
1162
hours. Three different PEM fuel cell size (1-1.2 kW) were considered in the calculations
performed with HOMER and electrical efficiency assumed constant at 38 %.
Compressed gas storage is used for this study. Small-quantity prices are around 1500 $/kg.
A hydrogen storage tank options was investigated in the optimization process, namely
1 Nm
3
(1kg) and the lifetime were also considered 20 years [23].
This system has an average AC load of 31 kWh/days, with the peak load of 2.9 kWh/days.
HOMER allows input of the operating reserve for the system. Result of here required the
operating reserve to be 10 % of the hourly load, plus 25 % of PV power output.
Fig. 3. Schematic of PV-Electrolyzer-Fuel cell power system
3.4. PV-hydrogen system optimization results
Actual load profile and meteorological data from the operation of the PV-fuel cell system in
Taleghan site were used in this study. Hourly solar radiation measurements for a period of one
year were imported into HOMER tools in order to calculate monthly average values of
clearness index and daily radiation [24]. According to data from Taleghan area, the solar
radiation is high, especially between June and August. The annual average global radiation is
4.5 kWh/m
2
.day with an annual average clearness index of 0.62 a nd the average daily
radiation is 5.095 kW h/m
2
. The existing system was simulated in order to evaluate its
operational characteristics, namely annual electrical energy production; annual electrical loads
served, excess electricity, RE fraction, capacity shortage, unmet load etc. some environmental
impact parameters of the system. A load-following control strategy was followed in the
simulation. Under this strategy, whenever a power generator in needed it produces only
enough power to meet the demand. Load following strategy tends to be optimal in systems
with a surplus of renewable energy. An annual interest rate of 10 % and a project of 20 years
were used in the economic calculations [24].
Table 3. Electrical production and demand for the stand-alone system
Annual Electric Energy
Production
Annual Electric Energy
Consumption
Other
PV Array
18025 kWh
(99%)
AC Primary Load
11116 kWh
(98%)
Excess Power 4109 kWh/years
Fuel Cell
101 kWh
(1%)
Electrolyzer Load
392 kWh
(2%)
Capacity
Shortage
157 kWh/years
Renewable
Fraction
100% Total 11508 kWh
CO
2
Emissions
0.0619 kg/year
The results of the simulation showed that this system had a total annual electrical energy
production of 18126 kWh, the RE fraction of which was 1 (i.e. 18025 kWh were produced
1163
by the PV array). All results related to the electric energy production and electric energy
consumption is summarized in Table 3. Latter is attributed to high nighttime load, which
enable the operation of fuel cell because PV energy stored in batteries is not adequate to serve
the load overnight. To increase renewable energy penetration excess energy can be stored in
the form of compressed hydrogen and drive a PEM fuel cell.
Table 4. Distribution of annualized costs for the main components of the stand-alone energy system
Component
Initial
Capital
($)
Annualized
Capital
($/year)
Annualized
Replacement
($/year)
Annual
O&M
($/year)
Annual
Fuel
($/year)
Total
Annualized
($/year)
PV Array 76000 8927 0 0 0 8927
Fuel Cell 5000 587 88 12.1 0 687
Battery 4896 575 320 0 0 895
Converter 13650 1603 0 0 0 1603
Electrolyzer 8100 951 272 0 0 1223
Hydrogen Tank 1500 176 0 0 0 176
Other 0 0 0 0.2 0 0
The Electrical production and demand of this system are listed in Table 3. When excess PV
energy is available, power is supplied first to the batteries, and then to an electrolyzer, which
generate hydrogen for storage. By using HOMER it can be decided whether to use energy
from the battery, fuel cell, or both based on t he replacement cost and O&M of the devices.
PV-Hydrogen system components are described in more detail in the following sections. Total
annualized costs for each component of the stand-alone energy system are shown in Table 4.
This is attributed to the fact that the lifetime of batteries is only 5 years, and the system
lifetime is 20 years. Therefore the battery bank needs to be replaced several times during the
project. The total net present cost (NPC) of this system at Taleghan site is around 115034 $
and cost of energy (COE) of the proposed hydrogen system is 1.216 $/kWh.
4. Conclusions
The replacement of conventional technologies, namely batteries by hydrogen technologies
including fuel cells in RE resources based stand-alone power systems is technologically
feasible. It reduces emissions, noise and fossil fuel dependence and increases RE penetration.
The coupling of PV field and electrolyzer allows converting at high efficiency renewable
electricity. There is no l oss whatever the storage time and no need of consumption to avoid
storage destruction. Using a fuel cell to get back to electricity induces a low efficiency but
allows building a silent energy generator consuming no materials. New energy generators for
stand-alone applications are expected to increase the comfort of people. The actual solutions
are either limited by a low autonomy inducing reduction of the electricity consumption during
worst seasons or noisy and using fossil energy. The coupling of a PV field and an electrolyzer
allows converting at high efficiency renewable electricity into time-stable storage from pure
water. Using a fuel cell to get back to electricity allows building a noiseless energy generator
consuming no materials. The gas storage induces a complete autonomy during all the years
and should increase the use of the renewable production. Iran country located on solar belt, so
it has great potentional in direct natural insolation for consuming and converting it to other
types of energy. Using solar energy required high initial investment, so converting solar
1164
energy to other types of energy with high efficiency systems is vital. Photovoltaic technology
provides a reliable energy for producing hydrogen by electrolysis. Constructing this project
illustrates photovoltaic system reliability, availability and being disputable in rural areas and
end point of electricity yield. (Conclusion extract from) system operation conclusions shows
equal real outputs, which calculated data and this, will be a start for gathering and processing
information from operational parameters, in software.
References
[1] K. Ro, S. Rahman, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 13 (3), 1998, pp. 276-281.
[2] A.M. Ramirez, P.J. Sebastian, S.A. Gamboa, M.A. Rivera, O. Cuevas, J. Campos, Int J
Hydrogen Energy 25, 2000, pp. 267-271.
[3] W. Isherwood, J.R. Smith, S.M. Aceves, G. Berry, W. Clark, R. Johnson, D. das, D.
Goering, R. Seifert, Solar Energy 25, 2000, pp. 1005-1020.
[4] . Ulleberg, Solar Energy 76, 2004, pp. 323-329.
[5] S.A. Sherif, F. Barbir, T.N. Vezirouglu, Solar Energy 78, 2005, pp. 647-660.
[6] D.B. Nelson, M.H. Nehrir, C. Wang, Renewable Energy 31, 2006, pp. 1641-1656.
[7] S. Busquet, F. Domain, R. Metkemeijer, D. Mayer, Ecole des Mines de Paris-Centre
dEnergtique, Rue Claude Daunesse, Les Lucioles-BP 207, F-06904 Sophia Antipolis.
[8] Technical Catalogue of Solar Module MA36/45,Optical Fiber Fabrication Company, Iran
[9] H. Moghbelli, R. Vartanian, International Conference on Renewable Energy for
Developing Countries, 2006.
[10] www.SMA.de
[11] K.E. Cox, K.D. Williamson, Hydrogen: its technology and implications, Ohio: CRC
Press Inc., 1977.
[12] P. Hollmuller, J. Joubert, B. Lachal, K. Yvon, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 25, 2000.
[13] R. Perez, Home Power 22, 1991, pp. 26-30.
[14] Fuel Cell Handbook, 6th ed., National Energy Technology Lab, U.S. DOE, Pittsburgh,
PA, 2002.
[15] S. Rahman and K. Tam, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 3 (1), 1988, pp. 50-55.
[16] Nexa (310-0027) Power Module Users Manual, MAN5100078, 2003.
[17] J. Cotrell, W. Pratt, NREL/TP-500-34648, 2003.
[18] E. Koutroulis, K. Kalaitzakis, Renewable Energy 28 (1), 2003, pp. 139-152.
[19] P. Lehman, C. Parra, Solar Today, the American solar energy society, 1994, pp: 20-22
[20] N. Nagai, M. Takeuchi, T. Kimura, T. Oka, Int. J Hydrogen Energy 28, 2003, pp. 35-41.
[21] Solar Electric Products Catalog, August 2005.
[22] NERL. Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewable (HOMER) Available freely at
(http://www.nrel.gov/international/tools/HOMER/homer.html).
[23] E.I. Zoulias, N. Lymberopoulos, Renewable Energy 32, 2007, pp. 680-696.
[24] RETScreen
TM
database, URL: www.retscreen.net.
1165