Freud Debasement
Freud Debasement
Freud Debasement
Steiner (ipo), Stekel (ipoS), Ferenczi (ipoS). [Freud had written a preface to Stekels book (Freud, ipoSf) and wrote
one later to a book of Steiners on the same subject (Freud, ipie).]
Sigmund Freud
The aectionate current is the older of the two.
It springs from the earliest years of childhood; it
is formed on the basis of the interests of the self-
preservative instinct and is directed to the mem-
bers of the family and those who look after the
child. From the very beginning it carries along
with it contributions from the sexual instincts
components of erotic interestwhich can already
be seen more or less clearly even in childhood and
in any event are uncovered in neurotics by psycho-
analysis later on. It corresponds to the childs pri-
mary object-choice. We learn in this way that the
sexual instincts nd their rst objects by attach-
ing themselves to the valuations made by the ego-
instincts, precisely in the way in which the rst sex-
ual satisfactions are experienced in attachment to
the bodily functions necessary for the preservation
of life.
or to
put it another way, becomes xated to unconscious
incestuous phantasies. The result is then total im-
potence, which is perhaps further ensured by the
simultaneous onset of an actual weakening of the
organs that perform the sexual act.
Less severe conditions are required to bring
about the state known specically as psychical im-
potence. Here the fate of the sensual current must
not be that its whole charge has to conceal itself
behind the aectionate current; it must have re
mained suciently strong or uninhibited to secure
a partial outlet into reality. The sexual activity of
[The attachment (or anaclitic) type of object-choice was discussed more fully in Freuds later paper on narcissism
(ipic).]
o
[Genesis ii, .]
[In the editions before ip the word used here is the very unusual Unbewusstsein, unconsciousness.]
ON THE UNIVERSAL TENDENCY TO DEBASEMENT IN THE SPHERE OF LOVE
such people shows the clearest signs, however, that
it has not the whole psychical driving force of the
instinct behind it. It is capricious, easily disturbed,
often not properly carried out, and not accompa-
nied by much pleasure. But above all it is forced
to avoid the aectionate current. A restriction has
thus been placed on object-choice. The sensual cur-
rent that has remained active seeks only objects
which do not recall the incestuous gures forbidden
to it; if someone makes an impression that might
lead to a high psychical estimation of her, this im-
pression does not nd an issue in any sensual excita-
tion but in aection which has no erotic eect. The
whole sphere of love in such people remains divided
in the two directions personied in art as sacred and
profane (or animal) love. Where they love they do
not desire and where they desire they cannot love.
They seek objects which they do not need to love,
in order to keep their sensuality away from the ob-
jects they love; and, in accord ance with the laws of
complexive sensitiveness
S
and of the return of the
repressed, the strange failure shown in psychical im-
potence makes its appearance whenever an object
which has been chosen with the aim of avoiding
incest recalls the prohibited object through some
feature, often an inconspicuous one.
The main protective measure against such a dis-
turbance which men have recourse to in this split
in their love consists in a psychical debasement of
the sexual object, the overvaluation that normally
attaches to the sexual object being reserved for the
incestuous object and its representatives. As soon
as the condition of debasement is fullled, sensual-
ity can be freely expressed, and important sexual
capacities and a high degree of pleasure can de-
velop. There is a further factor which contributes
to this result. People in whom there has not been
a proper conuence of the aectionate and the sen-
sual currents do not usually show much renement
in their modes of behaviour in love; they have re-
tained perverse sexual aims whose non-fullment is
felt as a serious loss of pleasure, and whose full-
ment on the other hand seems possible only with a
debased and despised sexual object.
We can now understand the motives behind the
boys phantasies mentioned in the rst of these
Contributions (above, p. ), which degrade the
mother to the level of a prostitute. They are ef-
forts to bridge the gulf between the two currents in
love, at any rate in phantasy, and by debasing the
mother to acquire her as an object of sensuality.