Key Reforms in Revitalizing TVET Malayisa
Key Reforms in Revitalizing TVET Malayisa
Key Reforms in Revitalizing TVET Malayisa
Key Reforms in Revitalising Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in Malaysia Dr. Pang Chau Leong
Director-General Department of Skills Development Ministry of Human Resources, Malaysia
Contents
1 2
Multiple providers, qualification & curricula create confusion for students and employers
TVET delivery system (overview)
Certificates offered
BEng Tech Adv Dip Tech Diploma Technology
4 1
MOHR
MOYS
MORRD
Universiti Kuala Lumpur
1
MOE
MOHE
MOA
MOD
Public Works
States
JMTI1
KKTM6
1
IKTBN4
GMI7
1
Initiatives under 10th Plan to harmonize accreditation across ministries Full recognition of SKM (Malaysian Skills Certificate) Board of Technologists to provide professional pathway Further improvements planned within TVET system and with the industry Central application system to be implemented 2011 Cooperation with industry through Technical Advisory Committees Active participation of industrial players through Industry Lead Bodies (ILBs) in training and assessments
CAM
28
Polytechnics
12
22
IKM6 ILP3
1 15 7110 6
500-600
IKBN5
202 GiatMARA9
MOA Community 88 Institutes tbc College Technical Perhebat and Institutes Vocational
School
Agensi Nuklear
31
CIDB
States institutes
Issue - Governance
Skills and Vocational & Technical are separate sectors with distinct accreditation
Different sectors in the Malaysian Qualification Framework ...
Skills sector
L8 L7
Higher education
Doctoral degree Masters degree Postgraduate dip. Bachelor degree Graduate certificate
MQF
L6
Separate governance of Skills and Vocational and Technical sector Limited coordination and duplication of responsibilities in calibrating learning outcomes Limited sharing of best practices Distinct accreditation (DSD and MQA) raises confusion Students and employers unclear of value/ differentiation among certificates Exacerbates unclear pathway for further education
L5
L4 L3 L2 L1
Advanced Diploma Diploma Skills Cert 3 Skills Cert 2 Skills Cert 1 DSD-accredited (MOHR) Accreditation process undertaken by DSD, based on NOSS
Advanced diploma Diploma Vocational and Technical Certificate MQA-accredited (MOHE) Internal quality assurance process, followed by MQA accreditation
Advanced diploma
Diploma
Certificate
Accreditation
Report to
Report to
Report to
MOHR
MOHE
MORRD
Report to Report to
MOYS
Report to
Public Works
More than 20 government agencies reporting to own ministries Lack of coordination between ministries result in lack of overall understanding of TVET landscape
Each state skills training department reports to a single federal ministry Provides clear overview of TVET landscape Increases efficiency
270,000 students enrolled in TVET system (in 2010), 70% in government institutions
Total enrolment 2010: ~270,000 students
25,000 at MOE Technical Sec. School + 185,000 at Public & States Inst. + 60,000 in Private MOHR MOYS MORRD MOE MOHE MOA MOD
Public Works
States
Private
GMI
2,700
88,000
20,000 700
~60,000
Polytechnic
10,000
17,000
Institutes
MOA
805
Institutes
Institutes
GiatMARA
Perhebat Institutes
Institutes
CIDB
7%
xx # students enrolled in institutions
21%
Employers
Employers may not be aware of the capabilities of graduates Many employers do not recognise the certifications due to the highly fragmented landscape today, with multiple ministries and industry issuing different certifications Students have a poor perception of skills training and view it as an option of last resort
Students/ Parents
Students (and their parents) lack funding or are unwilling to pay for skills training
There exists a mismatch between the types of training provided and market needs
Providers
Private skills training providers face regulatory constraints and long waiting process when setting up institutes
There is a shortage of funding for skills training Public service has limited access to Malaysian Skills Certificate holders.
Source : NKEA Education Lab
Economic Transformation Programme: 8 National Key Economic Areas (NKEA) require 1.3 million TVET jobs Persons in '000
600
595
553
536 497
49
Non-TEVT TEVT
400
386
350 435
275 246
449 229 192
200
181
49
157
114
209
75
52
43
23
52 25 27
43 23 CCI
42
20
20
21
Financial Business Healthcare2 Electrical Agriculture Oil, Gas Services Services Eng. and Energy 121 59 35 53 29 131
Palm Oil
NKEA sectors
108
36
125
1.3 Mn (~41%) of NKEA jobs to be filled by TVET; top 5 sectors make up 82% of TVET jobs
1. Refers to clerical, service and technical staff & lower management positions 2. ~71% of jobs are production supervisor, administrative staff and production line leader Source: PEMANDU; BCG analysis
Based on historical trends, it will be challenging for skills training to meet the requirements for a high income economy
No. of certificates
60,000
CAGR ('05-'09)
42,500 35,000
0%
40,000
-3% 10th MP target of 50% highly skilled workforce by 2020 and ETP target of 1.3Mn new TVET related jobs unlikely to be met
20,000
13,000
-5%
1,500 0
0%
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 SKM 1 SKM 2 SKM 3 SKM 4 and 5
Issuance of skills certificates has experienced little growth over the past 5 years despite various policy recommendations aimed at increasing its attractiveness
The number of certificates awarded for SKM1 and SKM2 has declined and leveled off over the last 5 years Challenge is to now increase enrolment in SKM 3, 4 & 5
Note: Numbers represent SKMs conferred by both public institutions and JPK accredited private institutions Source: JKMPMI, Feb 2010 / bcq Inception Report
3
Scaling up private TVET training provision
2
Rationalising TVET provisioning to meet economic & employment needs
Efforts to standardise the quality of training curriculum through rigorous participation of industries; overcome the duplication of training and certification activities; and intensify promotion of skills training will be undertaken to uplift the current competency level of the workforce to a higher level of performance and SkillsMalaysia 2011 Campaign productivity.
Launch of SkillsMalaysia promotion campaign by the Dep. Prime Minister, 5 May 2011
Rationalising TVET offerings will require harmonising courses across multiple qualifications systems
Issues identified
a
Multiple qualification systems Institutions not taking into account offerings in the broader system
Supply weighted towards b lower-level courses Inappropriate for future requirements of the Malaysian economy Overlapping courses and c institutions Delivery capabilities lack scale Prevailing system confusing to navigate and regulate
Review levels of course offering to target industry needs Build coherent approach for certificates and diplomas to match job levels required by employers Rationalise delivery of course offering and reduce duplication Between ministries Between institutions
Promoting closer links with industry Harmonise skill training by regulatory reform
Appoint Industry Lead Body (ILB) for each skills sector to guide development of TVET in Malaysia
Employers
2
training providers by expanding JPKs role as the single accreditation body Establish Board of Technologists to regulate, monitor and accredit all TVET programs
Increase availability Increase demand side funding (PTPK) to increase access to skills 3 of demand-side training Increase availability of HRDF funds for up-skilling of workforce funding Students
4
Conduct awareness Roll out SkillsMalaysia branding for all initiatives to promote skills training campaign Articulate professional pathway of qualified instructors
Articulate professional pathway for TVET by allowing Malaysian Skills Certificate holders to progress to selected degree programs Review the SKM evaluation system to enable ease of pathway articulation Allow academically qualified and experienced industry personnel to fasttrack to become TVET instructors Market SkillsMalaysia internationally to attract foreign students to enrol skills training programmes Buying places from private skills training providers to utilise excess capacity
Providers
7
Assist providers in into Malaysian TVET systems attracting students Review and simplify regulation to allow international students to enter
Improving the Perception of TVET and Attracting More Trainees A national media campaign to be developed and rolled-out Transformation of vocational schools system
Upgrading &Harmonising TVET Curriculum Quality in Line with Industry Requirements Standardize TVET curriculum Recognizing SKM as single TVET certification A Board of Technologists Malaysia will be established Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology will be established Developing Highly Effective Instructors Highly experienced industry personnel to become instructors ... Part-time working arrangements will be expanded Centre for Instructor and Advanced Skills Training (CIAST) will be expanded. A new CIAST to be established to add a further training capacity of 800 instructors each year Streamlining Delivery of TVET The current funding approach of TVET will be reviewed to provide financial assistance to students to study at SKM Level 3 The performance rating of TVET institutions will be utilized when making decisions for buying places in private TVET institutions RM150 million to train 20,000 school dropouts using the NDTS approach
Conclusions
Malaysia aspires to move up the value chain to become a high income economy. A skilled workforce is critical to achieving this goal. Consequently, it is important to increase the enrolment in TVET and raise the overall quality. With the introduction of ETP, demand is expected to outgrow supply. By 2020, additional 3.3 Mn jobs will be created, of which 1.3 Mn will be TVET qualified. Issues faced by key stakeholders need to be addressed: Students: TVET is currently not a mainstream education option and typically not a viable alternative to entering the workforce as it does not provide clear educational and professional pathways TVET providers: Highly fragmented landscape with numerous providers from various ministries resulting in multiple qualifications systems and non-uniform curricula standards Employers: Lack of recognition for TVET qualifications from employers / industry players A comprehensive set of initiatives is being developed to fill these shortfalls: Rebranding TVET to mainstream & improve perception of TVET Rationalize & streamline the TVET sector including provision, operating model and funding structure Scale up private skills training provision
THANK YOU