Indeks Diasatase Urine PDF
Indeks Diasatase Urine PDF
Indeks Diasatase Urine PDF
Section
oj Surgery
339
subsequent changes in renal function. During and immediately after the operation, a marked drop in blood-pressure was accompanied by polyuria while the urine at this time showed a high urea concentration, indicating normal renal function. Later on the rate of urinary outpuLt increased still further and numerous hyaline casts were present in several urine specimens. These we must assume had accumulated during the earlier phase of dccreased renal function. After blood and serum transfusions amounting to a total of 5 pints the blood-pressure rose to normal and no further changes were observed. CGmbined clinical and bicchemical studies in such cases will no doubt reveal many examples of such early changes in renal function. Mr. Guy Blackburn: Sodium sulphate is Lindo abtedly of value in these cases. A good parallel could be drawn from its use in calculous anuria and after urological operations. Similarly both sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate intravenouslv could be useful, the latter especially in raising the alkali reserve. This has been particutlarlv evident in a case recently reported by me in the literatture (Brit. Al. J., 1941 (ii), 475). I feel that one should be quite clear as to the distinction between inability to pass water and sLppression of urine in dealing with air-raid casualties; Munro's tidal drainage is a useful therapeutic measure with the first of these. Chemotherapy can be dangerous in crush injuries, wvhere deposition of crystals in the tuibules can easily enhance the degree of obstructioni already present.
FJawtitari' 7, 1942]
By E.
B. C. HUGHES, F.R.C.S.
SUMMARY SONIE time before this war, an investigation was begun in an attempt to clear up the uncertainty surrouuiding this test. Some of the findings are reported here. Lewison (1941) has presented results in some 700 cases of various abdominal diseases, and has summarized the literature. His conclusions give a very fair picture of the present beliefs concerning this test. He states in conclusion that: " Deviations from the normal (blood) amylase value occur infrequently in diseases other than pancreatitis. The range of these aberrations is restricted and unlikely to be a source of diagnostic error." Although the number of cases in this investigation is small, certain facts emerge which seem to contradict this statement, and to be of sufficient importance to justify their presentatiolt. The urinie amylase has been estimated oving to the ease with which specimens could be obtained, and also in order to obtain some idea as to the value of a single urine cstimation in the diagnosis of acute abdominal conditions. The method used has been to incubate the urine with starch solution and to estimate the (lisappearance of the starch bv means of iodine. Particular emphasis must be laid on keeping the temperature, pH value and quantities constant in each reading. A large number of estimations were done, and amongst these ivere estimations on forty cases of acute peptic ulcer perforation. In these forty cases, four were found in which the utrinie diastase wvas over 300 units, and of a level previously thought diagnostic of paancreatitis. In addition three of these cases had areas of fat necrosis, and in these the pancr ,as seemed normal at operation. The fourth case had no fat necrosis present. At post-miiortem the pancreas was found to be normal. In two of the cases the diastase level fell rapidly after operation to normal limits. In two the post-operative levels were not done. All were duodenal perforations in the anterior wall. Thlree suggestions are made as to the possible cause of this finding. First, these cases may have had a separate area of pancreatitis. This seemed an unlikely combination, and neither the rapid return of the diastase to normal, nor the negative findings in the one post-mortem would seem to support this. Dr. Hamilton Patterson (1939), however,
XTARCH-SURG. 3
340
30
informs me that he has performed a post-mortem on such a case. Secondly, these cases may have had other peptic ulcers on the posterior wall of the viscus, penetrating the pancreas and giving rise to a local area of pancreatitis. The previous history, the rapid return of the diastase to normal, and their uneventful progress does not seem to favour this possibility. Many such cases, however, have been described, particularly by Probstein, Wheeler and Gray (1939), and by Meyer and Amtman (1936). The third suggestion is, that at the time of perforation the viscus is filled with pancreatic juice and this is discharged from the duodenum, and hence adsorbed from the peritoneum. It is believed that these facts are of some importance in view of the modern tendency to treat pancreatitis conservatively. It is possible that this diagnostic error may be avoided by estimating the diastase at higher levels, and preferably in the blood. A quick and reliable method has recently been described bv Somogyi (1938) in which the estimation may be done in a few minutes without the necessity of incubating large numbers of tubes. This process is now on trial for these estimations in acute abdominal disease. Estimations have been done on samples from many different hospitals and from many individual surgeons. I am, however, cspccially grateful to the staffs of University College Hospital, and of the Royal Sussex County Hospital for their help. REFEREN NCES HANIILTON PATTERSON, J. (19,39), PersoInal Communication. LEWISON, E. F. (1941), Szurg., Gynec. & Obst., 72, 202. MEYER, K., and AMTMAN, L. (1936), Atm. /. Snirg., 33, 307. PROBSTEIN, WHEELER, and GRAY (1939), J. Lab. & Clin. Aled., 24, 449. SOMOGYI, M. (1938), J. Biol. (Chem.. 125, 399. [This intvestigationz is still in progress. 7he aImtplified findings woill be faiblisled lazter.]