Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 720 views

    Malaysia Vs Singapore

    Uploaded by

    Bunjin Yun
    The document compares the public education systems of Singapore and Malaysia. It outlines three key differences: 1) Singapore schools use English as the primary language of instruction, while Malaysia switched between English and Malay over time. 2) Singapore better serves high-achieving students through programs like the Integrated Program. 3) Singapore provides choice and a higher quality education at a lower cost compared to Malaysia, as seen through its top schools and admission rates to foreign universities. While both systems face criticisms, Singapore appears to outperform Malaysia in international education rankings and producing employable graduates.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Malaysia Vs Singapore

    Uploaded by

    Bunjin Yun
    720 views3 pages
    The document compares the public education systems of Singapore and Malaysia. It outlines three key differences: 1) Singapore schools use English as the primary language of instruction, while Malaysia switched between English and Malay over time. 2) Singapore better serves high-achieving students through programs like the Integrated Program. 3) Singapore provides choice and a higher quality education at a lower cost compared to Malaysia, as seen through its top schools and admission rates to foreign universities. While both systems face criticisms, Singapore appears to outperform Malaysia in international education rankings and producing employable graduates.

    Original Title

    Malaysia vs Singapore

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares the public education systems of Singapore and Malaysia. It outlines three key differences: 1) Singapore schools use English as the primary language of instruction, while Malaysia switched between English and Malay over time. 2) Singapore better serves high-achieving students through programs like the Integrated Program. 3) Singapore provides choice and a higher quality education at a lower cost compared to Malaysia, as seen through its top schools and admission rates to foreign universities. While both systems face criticisms, Singapore appears to outperform Malaysia in international education rankings and producing employable graduates.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    720 views3 pages

    Malaysia Vs Singapore

    Uploaded by

    Bunjin Yun
    The document compares the public education systems of Singapore and Malaysia. It outlines three key differences: 1) Singapore schools use English as the primary language of instruction, while Malaysia switched between English and Malay over time. 2) Singapore better serves high-achieving students through programs like the Integrated Program. 3) Singapore provides choice and a higher quality education at a lower cost compared to Malaysia, as seen through its top schools and admission rates to foreign universities. While both systems face criticisms, Singapore appears to outperform Malaysia in international education rankings and producing employable graduates.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Singapore & Malaysia A comparison of public education systems (Part 2)

    The first key difference is this - In Singapore, all public schools instruct in English. Interestingly enough, the situation was once the same in Malaysia, beginning from the time when the colonial British powers introduced English medium schools into Malaysia, phasing out many Malay medium schools. This lasted until about 1970, when the Malaysian government began to reverse the process, phasing out English medium schools and replacing them with KBSM curriculum and Malay medium schools completely by 1983. In 2003, then Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad did an about-face, declaring that science and mathematics would be taught in English, a policy that the government sought to abolish no less than four years after its inception. The second key difference is this, the Singaporean system serves high achievers better. Brand differentiation certainly exists amongst schools in Malaysia; among public schools, this is judged by schools performance in the SPM examinations, top performing public schools including the likes of SMK Convent Bukit Nanas, the MRSM schools, and SMK(P) Sri Aman, which regularly top the SPM ranking tables in terms of numbers of As and overall achievement. It is a hasty generalisation to make that Singaporean public school teachers always serve their students better, but there is evidence that, at the very least, that Singaporean teachers can serve their very best better, for if there is one thing that Singapore does that we do not do here in Malaysia, it is acknowledge talent and perform by meritocracy.

    In Malaysia, the intention is there, but the means of execution typically does not succeed. After the PMR examinations, students are streamed into the Science and Arts streams, the consequence of this being that students take a different subject combination relative to their peers. Too often, the best and brightest are demarcated simply by the subject combinations that they take and the number of As they receive, producing batch after batch of students cookie-cutter aligned to a standard of excellence that bears little relation to the professional world. However, education is not so homogeneous and one-dimensional. Exceptionally gifted students in Singapore are given access to the Integrated Programme (IP) after the PSLE (Singaporean equivalent of UPSR), and students are given access to academic material beyond the scope of the typical Singaporean curriculum, allowing them to skip the OLevel examinations and do only the ALevel examinations instead. Thirdly, Singapore does all of these things more efficiently, and for a cheaper price. In Singapore, there is choice in terms of school selection if you are part of the elite. A quick analysis of H2 mathematics papers will show that the syllabus in Singaporean Junior Colleges covers a scope far wider than that of Malaysias STPM or Matriculation courses. The top public school in Singapore is widely known as Raffles Institution, known also as the Gateway to the Ivy League. Similarly famous competitors such as Hwachong Institution and Victoria Institution follow behind, catering to local students for a fraction of the price that private institutions in Malaysia charge. Additionally, foreign universities often stand in apparent acknowledgement of the dominance of the Singaporean model of education. The country boasts of the highest per capita Cambridge admit rate in the world, while the Malaysian school system continues to be left languishing amid discussions whether English medium science and mathematics education is suitable. To some extent, while the Singaporean model provides the sort of education that many Malaysians who frequent this site actively seek for their children, it is not without its failures, though these failures sound hauntingly familiar to those of us who have been reading the newspaper as of late. Whereas the Singaporean public education system is criticised by some academics for excessive emphasis on rote learning and subsequently producing graduates who lack critical thinking faculties, employers also often cite the familiar tune that Malaysian graduates are unemployable for the same reason, with added vitriol in the form of criticism of our ability to converse in English. What lessons can we draw from public schools and education policy across the causeway? Do we prevaricate and pontificate that the Singaporeans are getting a better public education than us? Yes, they use better English than us, they stream their students slightly more than us. They consistently perform in the top 5 when it comes to international education surveys. Regardless of the semantics, its clear that Malaysia has something to learn from the Singaporean public education system. Until there is a serious and concerted effort to work towards improving public education here in Malaysia, private and international schools here in Malaysia will stand to fill gaps, unlike in Singapore, where their role is to supplement what already exists.

    http://www.mymalaysiabooks.com/education/education_MsiaSpore.htm

    http://educationmalaysia.blogspot.com/2005/12/pros-of-education-insingapore.html

    http://whatisgeneharn.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-differs-singapores-educationfrom.html

    http://www.beritaterkini.my/ranking-pendidikan-malaysia-dunia

    http://www.slideshare.net/JERCAS/malaysia-educational-system

    http://www.uniguru.co.in/studyabroad/Singapore/top-best-university/educationsystem-in-Singapore.html

    http://cia-world-fact-book.findthedata.org/compare/915-979/Malaysia-vsSingapore

    You might also like