Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems: Challenge For The Future
Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems: Challenge For The Future
Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems: Challenge For The Future
THE FUTURE
IVHS has the potential for substantially improving our transportation systems.
The goals and objectives of IVHS include improved safety. reduced congestion,
increased and higher quality mobility, improved environmental quality and energy
efficiency. improved economic productivity, the development of an IVHS supply
industry in the United States, major changes in the transportation profession, and the
development and deployment of a variety of new technologies and new partnerships
between the public and private sector.
While IVHS has the potential, substantial work needs to take place if IVHS is to
be successful. In this paper, we have discussed the institutional barriers that IVHS
faces Further, there are important hardware and software technological challenges that
must be met.
In 1986, an informal group of academics, federal and state transportation officials,
and representatives of the private sector began to meet to discuss the future of the
surface
transportation system in the United States. These meetings were motivated by several
key factors.
First, the group was looking ahead to 1991 when a new federal transportation bill
was scheduled to be enacted. It was envisioned that this 1991 transportation bill
would be the first one in the post-Interstate era. The Interstate system, a $120 billion
dollar program, had been the keystone of the highway system in the United States
since the mid-1950s. By 1991 this project would be largely complete. A new vision
for the transportation system in the United States needed to be developed.
Second, despite the advances in highway transportation in the United States
brought about by the development of the Interstate, a large number of major problems
remained. First, congestion had been growing dramatically over the past twenty to
thirty years-leading to gridlock conditions in a number of US cities. Further, it was
clear that we could no longer build our way out of these congestion problems because
of economic, political and social constraints, particularly in urban areas.
From the highway passenger’s viewpoint, traffic delays are substantial and
growing. Rush hour conditions in many metropolitan areas often extend throughout
the day. The percentage of peak hour travel on urban interstates that occurred under
congested conditions reached 70% in 1989, up from 41% in 1975. Urban freeway
delay is now 2 billion vehicle hours per year - about 65% of this due to non- recurring
incidents.
Further, safety problems abound. Safety on our nation’s highways is an important
public health problem. In 1991, the US paid the extraordinary costs of 41,000 deaths
and 5,000,000 injuries on our highways. Traffic accidents cost the US an estimated
$70 billion in lost wages and other direct costs annually. The economic loss from
traffic crashes is 2% of the US gross national product. It amounts to $0.05 per
vehicle-mile traveled or $600 per year per motor vehicle.
Also, the US was (and is) concerned with the environmental impacts of
transportation and the energy implications of various transportation policies. Any new
initiatives in the surface transportation world had to explicitly consider environmental
and energy issues.
The third major motivation for considering the future of surface transportation is
national productivity and international competitiveness, both closely linked to the
efficiency of our transportation system. In 1986, our major economic rivals in western
Europe (Project Prometheus) and Japan (Project AMTICS and RACS) were
advancing very quickly in areas involving the development of new technologies for
use in advanced surface transportation systems. Their use of high technology concepts
in the information systems and communications areas were envisioned as having the
opportunity to revolutionize the world of surface transportation, improving the
competitiveness of these nations and providing them with an important new set of
industries and markets.
New transportation legislation (at that time five years in the future),
In 1990, the need for a formal organization became clear and IVHS America (the
Intelligent Vehicle Highway Society of America) was formed as a utilized Federal
Advisory Committee for the US Department of Transportation. Currently, IVHS
America has 250 organizational members.
In December 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)
became law. It’s purpose was ... to develop a National Intermodal Transportation
System that is economically sound, provides the foundation for the Nation to compete
in the global economy, and will move people and goods in an energy efficient
manner.”
As was envisioned in 1986, IVHS was an integral part of ISTEA with $660
million allocated for research, development and operational tests. This, together with
substantial state and local government funds and private investment, suggests that
IVHS will be a critical component of the US transportation landscape for the 21st
century.
In June 1992, IVHS America produced a “Strategic Plan for Intelligent Vehicle
Highway Systems in the US” and delivered it to DOT as a 20-year blueprint for
research, development, operational testing and deployment.
Transportation& Technologv
In the near term, collision warning systems would alert the driver to a possible
imminent collision. In more advanced systems, the vehicle would automatically break
or steer away from a collision. Both systems are autonomous to the vehicle and can
provide substantial benefits by improving safety and reducing accident induced
congestion.
In the longer term, AVCS concepts would rely more heavily on infrastructure
information and control that could produce improvements in roadway throughput of
two to four times. Movements of all vehicles in special lanes are automatically
controlled. One could envision cars running in closely spaced (headways of less than
one foot) platoons of ten or more, at normal highway speed, under automatic control.
The above three, ATMS, ATIS, and AVCS, are all technological functions of
IVHS. ATMS and ATIS will have early applications in urban and suburban areas.
AVCS is envisioned as a longer term program.
In addition, there are three major applications areas that are already beginning to
draw upon IVHS technologies. These are:
Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO).In CVO, the private operators of trucks,
vans, and taxis have already begun to adopt IVHS technologies to improve the
productivity of their fleets and the efficiency of their operations. This is proving to be
a leading edge application because of direct bottom-line advantages.
Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS). AFTS can use the above
technologies to greatly enhance the accessibility of information to users of public
transportation as well as to improve scheduling of public transportation vehicles and
the utilization of bus fleets.