A System of Marking Turtles for Future Identification Author(s): Fred R. Cagle Reviewed work(s): Source: Copeia, Vol.

1939, No. 3 (Sep. 9, 1939), pp. 170-173 Published by: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1436818 . Accessed: 28/02/2013 20:00
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Copeia.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:00:08 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

170

COPEIA

1939,No. 3 9 September

AN ANOMALOUSPREGNANCY IN THE COPPERHEAD--A female highland moccasinor copperhead(Agkistrodonmokasen) collected at Abbeville, Mississippi,was brought into the University of Mississippi WPA Plant and Animal Survey Laboratory on July 12, 1938, by Mr. Earl Wimberly.The snake was set aside in a glass jar until July 16, when it was killed preparatoryto examinationfor internal parasites.It measured 680 mm. in total length, with a tail length of 87 mm. On opening the specimenit was found to contain five living embryosattachedto and developingwithin the oviduct. These were normal in every respect, and had developed all the facial features and some of the internal organs, resemblingchick embryos after about 72 hours of incubation. Four embryos removed from the egg membranesaveraged 59.5 mm. in total length. The right ovary containeda dozen or more small immature eggs, the largest of which was about 3 mm. in long diameter, but the right oviduct containedno developingeggs. At the anterior end of the left oviduct, adjacent to the embryos, was an egg that had become non-viable and hardened,consisting wholly of yolk. It measured35 mm. in long diameter and 20 mm. in transverse diameter, and was ovate in form. The
viable eggs, in contrast, were soft and almost spherical, with an average diameter of

approximately25 mm.
Further examination revealed a fully developed young copperhead lying tightly coiled in S-form just caudad of the most posterior viable egg. This snake was dead and about half of it was in a kind of mummified state. It was surrounded by the usual egg membranes. It measured 180 mm. in total length and had been greatly distorted, especially in the head region. The snake was attached to the intestinal mesentery, and had apparently developed ecto]?ically within the body cavity of the mother; it was not connected to the oviduct in any way. It seems likely that this embryo was carried over from the previous year.-JoHN S. DOLLEY, University, Mississippi.

A SYSTEM OF MARKING TURTLES FOR FUTURE IDENTIFICATION.1-A

a
,

I 2.

1. 2. 3. Figure 1.-Marginal plates are numbered 1 to 12 on each side. Plates 4, 5, 6, 7 can not be marked satisfactorily in most turtles. A turtle marked as shown would be recognized as 0-1. Figure 2.-Plastral plates can be marked as above. A notch in marginal plate 1 to indicate the second series of marks; a notch in plate 2 to indicate the third series, etc. Figure 3.-The feet are placed in walking position and the toes numbered 1-5 on the forefoot and 6-9 on the rear foot. Dotted line indicates portion of toe removed.

Mr. John T. Nichols of the AmericanMuseum of Natural History has been marking box turtles for twenty-four years, using a system in which figures are carved in the plates of the carapace. Mr. Nichols states in correspondence that such marks remain distinct after ten or fifteen years, but that they can not be used on turtles that molt the outer plates or on those taken in large quantities at one time.
SA contribution from the University of Michigan Biological Station.

This content downloaded on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:00:08 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

1939, No. 3 September9

HERPETOLOGICAL NOTES

171

The marking system making use of notches in the carapace and plastron, and of clipped toes, described below, was worked out under the direction of the late Dr. Frank N. Blanchard during the summer of 1937 at the University of Michigan Biological Station, Douglas Lake, Michigan. Marginal plates, exclusive of those connected to the plastron, are marked by a rectangular notch, one-third to one-half the width of the plate. Such notches can be quickly made with a triangular file to make the first cut, followed by a square-edged file to widen it to the proper shape (fig. 5). This filing requires only a few minutes and does little injury to the turtle, although occasionally it may cause the wound to bleed slightly. Small turtles whose carapace is not ossified may be marked with a small pair of sharp-pointed scissors. Care should be taken in marking turtles whose carapace is partially ossified, as the process is likely to cause serious fracture of carapacial plates, resulting in the death of the turtle or loss of a considerable portion of the carapace (fig. 4.)

4.

5.

Figure 4.-Results of attemptingto marka partiallyossifiedcarapacewith scissors. This turtle was marked8, 11-3. The marksin the plates 8 and 11 caused the adjacentcostal scutes to fracture and drop away. Figure 5.-A turtle marked1, 3, 8-11. The marginals must be marked according to a definite system. Beginning with the anterior marginal on each side, the plates are numbered from front to back (fig. 1). Plates should always be counted from the nuchal, as many individuals have an abnormal number of marginals. All North American genera except Armyda, Sternotherus, and Kinosternon have 12 marginals on each side. Sternotherus and Kinosternon may be marked by this method, but the combinations using plate 12 must be eliminated. Experiments on marking Amyda by tattooing are in progress. The marginal plates at the junction of carapace and plastron can not be marked. Thus in the genera Clemmys, Emys, Chrysemys, Pseudemys, Chelydra, Macrochelys, Malaclemmys, Sternotherms, Kinosternon, and Terrapene, marginals 4, 5, 6, and 7 can not be used. In Graptemys all the marginals except 5 and 6 can be used. In recording marks, a hyphen is used to separate the left and right sides. Thus 1-2 indicates that the first marginal on the left side and the second marginal on the right

This content downloaded on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:00:08 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

172

COPEIA

No.3 1939, 9 September

side are notched,while 8, 12-11 indicatesthat the eighth and the twelfth on the left side and the eleventhon the right side are notched. The system uses first all the possiblecombinationswith one plate.
1-0 0-1 2-0 0-2 3-0 0-3 8-0 0-8 9-0 0-9 10-0 0-10 11-0 0-11 12-0 0-12 All possible combinations using two plates. 8-1 3-1 2-1 1-1 to 3-2 2-2 1-2 8-12 2-3 3-3 1-3 etc. to 3-8 2-8 1-8 12-12 3-9 1-9 2-9 2-10 3-10 1-10 2-11 3-11 1-11 3-12 1-12 2-12 3 3, 8 -0 8, 9-0 2, -0 1, 2 -0 to 3, 9 -0 2, 8 -0 1, 3 -0 3, 10-0 8, 12-0 2, 9 -0 1, 8 -0 etc. 11-0 10-0 9 -0 2, 3, 1, to 3, 12-0 2, 11-0 1, 10-0 11, 12-0 2, 12-0 1, 11-0 1, 12-0 Reverse last half of this series. Thus 1, 2-0 will become 0-1, 2; 11, 12-0 will become 0-11, 12. All possible combinations using three plates. 1, 8-1 1, 3-1 1, 9-1 1, 2-1 to 1, 8-2 1, 3-2 1, 2-2 8-3 3-3 2-3 1, 1, 1, 1, 9-12 1, 10-1 1, 8-8 1, 3-8 1, 2-8 etc. to 1, 8-9 1, 3-9 1, 2-9 1, 8-10 1, 2-10 1, 3-10 1, 12-12 1, 3-11 1, 8-11 1, 2-11 1, 3-12 1, 8-12 1, 2-12 1, 9, 10-0 2, 3, 8-0 1, 2, 3 -0 1, 8, 9 -0 1, 3, 8 -0 2, 9, 10-0 9 -0 8 -0 to to to 1, 8, 10-0 1, 3, 1, 2, 1,8, 11-0 1, 3, 10-0 1, 11, 12-0 2, 3, 12-0 1, 2, 9 -0 2, 11, 12-0 1, 8, 12-0 1,3, 11-0 1, 2, 10-0 1, 3, 12-0 2, 8, 9-0 1, 2, 11-0 to 1, 2, 12-0 Reverse series. 2, 8, 12-0 four combinations using All possible plates. 1, 2, 8-1 1, 2, 3-1 to 1, 2, 3-2 1, 2, 8-12 1, 2, 3-3 1, 2, 3-9 1, 2, 3-10 1, 2, 3-11 1, 2, 3-12

1, 2, 3-8

etc. to

1, 11,12-12 1, 2, 3, 8-0 1, 2, 3, 9-0 1, 2, 3, 10-0 1, 2, 3, 11-0 1, 2, 3, 12-0

1, 2, 8, 9-0 1, 2, 8, 10-0 1, 2, 8, 11-0 1, 2, 8, 12-0 1, 2, 9, 10-0 1, 2, 9, 11-0 1, 2, 9, 12-0

1,3,8, 9-0 1, 3, 8, 10-0 1, 3, 8, 11-0 1, 3, 8, 12-0 etc. to 1, 10, 11, 12-0 2, 3, 8, 9-0 to 2, 3, 8, 12-0 2, 3, 9, 10-0 2, 3, 11, 12-0 3, 8, 9, 10-0 etc. to 9, 10, 11, 12-0

to

Reverse series.

This procedureprovides 16 numbers using one notch; 120 using two; 560 using three; 1820 using four; a total of 2516 marks. If more are needed, the series may be repeatedwith a notch on one of the plastralscutes (fig. 2). It is believedthat these marks will last for several years except in young specimens. Hildebrandand Hatsel (1926, Bur. Fish. Econ. Circ. 60) state that such notches are permanentif made when the shell is well ossified, but that the marks tend to become obliteratedin juvenile specimens. In order to insure identificationof juvenile specimens,they may be given a toe mark in addition to the.mark on the carapace. The first phalanxof the toe is completely

This content downloaded on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:00:08 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

1939, No. 3 September9

HERPETOLOGICAL NOTES

173

removed by a snip of the scissors. Such cuts cause little pain and specimensmarked show rapid healing and practicallyno regeneration. With the feet in walking position, the toes are numbered1-5 on the front foot and 6-9 on the hind foot (last toe is often unsuitablefor clipping) (fig. 3). A system similar to that for the carapacemarks is used. Thus 1-0 indicatesthat only the first toe of the left side was clipped; 1, 2-9 indicates that the first and second on the left side and the ninth on the right side were clipped. Turtles are frequently found with toes amputated and sections of marginal plates missing. Such accidentallymarked turtles can almost always be identified as such, because they rarely fit the special combinationof marks or the size of the turtle indicated in the records. Turtles marked and released in Nigger Creek, near the University of Michigan BiologicalStation, in the summerof 1937, and recoveredthe summerof 1938 showed no indication of regenerationof toes or of bone in the marginal notches. The latter had tended to enlarge somewhat.-FREDR. CAGLE, Museum of Natural and Social Sciences, SouthernIllinois Normal University,Carbondale, Illinois. POSSIBLE HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN BUFO COGNATUS AND B. W. WOODHOUSII.'-During the evening of March 30, 1938, while collecting mated pairs of Bufo cognatus, near Norman, Oklahoma,a large female of B. w. woodhousii was found in amplexuswith a medium-sizedmale of B. cognatus. These two toads were in the midst of a lively mixed chorus of the two species in the only area in the vicinity used extensivelyby both species for breeding. The animalswere taken to the laboratory and confined in a washboiler containing about three inches of water and left undisturbed over night. The following morning thousands of eggs were in the boiler and more were being deposited. The toads were still in amplexus, but the male left the female when disturbed. some of the eggs proved to be in the four-celledstage. Many were Upon examination, placed in shallow glass dishes of tap or spring water and allowed to develop into tadpoles. These were fed upon algae and reared through the spring months. Three metamorphosed,beginningon May 15. As the larvae developed, a few were studied from time to time while still alive, with a binocular microscope. Their general appearanceand the details of the mouthparts conformedvery closely to those of B. w. woodhousiidescribedby Youngstromand Smith (1936, Amer. Midl. Nat. 17:629-633). I was fortunateto have tadpoles of B. w. woodhousiiand of B. cognatus developing at the same time, with which to comparespecimensof the supposed cross. At all stages, including the recently metamorphosedyoung, I could find no features characteristic of B. cognatus. Had I not known their origin, I should have called every specimen B. w. woodhousiiwithout hesitation. There are two possible interpretationsof the above observations: (1) the two species were actually crossed,but the genes of the mother which governedthe external appearancewere dominant in the Mendelian sense; (2) we have a case of parthenogenesis in which the sperm initiated development but took no further part in the productionof the embryo. Artificialparthenogenesis is well known in frogs; and other cases have been describedamong animals in which the sperm did not contribute chromatin material to the embryo. Hybridizationamong toads has often been suspected but the evidence has usually been inconclusive,as is mine in this instance (see, for example, Hubbs, 1918, COPEIA, 54:40-43; Power, 1926, Proc. Zool. Soc. London: 777-778; and Myers, 1927, CoPEIA, 163:50-52). When time permits, I expect to examine fixed and preserved embryos of this lot by cytological or other means, in the hope of finding evidence of their hybrid or parthenogenetic nature. The adults (Nos. 20,179 and 20,180) have been placed in the University of Oklahoma Museum of Zoology.-ARTHUR N. BRAGG, Zoology Department, University of Oklahoma,Norman, Oklahoma.
SContributions

from the Zoological Laboratory of the University of Oklahoma, No. 196.

This content downloaded on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:00:08 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions