http://www.epmagazine.org/storage/164/benzene.

aspx

http://www.epmagazine.org/storage/165/benzene-evidence.aspx

> The Structure of Benzene

Fig. 1 Freidrich August Kekul

During 1825 the hydrocarbon Benzene was first isolated by Michael Faraday, nine years later Benzenes molecular formula, C6H6 was calculated. This highly unusual and puzzling molecular formula consequently prompted vast speculation from chemists worldwide regarding the structure of the Benzene molecule. Then one dark German evening in 1862 a lone figure, haunted by his continuing failings to identify the illusive structure of the Benzene molecule, dozed exhausted by the fire. As he watched the flames flicker in the grate he suddenly saw snake like molecules dancing and writhing in the flames. Bemused he continued to stare until one of the snakes grasped its own tail in its mouth and formed a ring like structure. The man startled by the image awoke but the image of the ring remained vivid in his mind. Three years later, the same man, Freidrich August Kekul proudly presented his proposed structure of the Benzene molecule Kekuls model of Benzene was born.

Fig. 2 The hydrogenation of Benzene

Kekuls structure of Benzene Kekul proposed that the benzene molecule had a cyclic ring structure with alternating double Carbon-Carbon bonds and single Carbon-Carbon bonds. This structure was accepted for many years however during this period many new pieces of evidence arose questioning Kekuls model of Benzene leading to the eventual proposal of a new model regarding the structure of Benzene. Evidence 1 X ray diffraction

Using single crystal X ray diffraction patterns the single Carbon-Carbon bond lengths in Cyclohexene (used due to its similar structure to Kekuls model of Benzene including possessing single Carbon-Carbon bonds, having a double Carbon-Carbon bond and a cyclic structure) were measured to be 0.154nm. The bond length of the double Carbon-Carbon bond in Cyclohexene was also measured by X ray diffraction giving a value of 0.133nm. If indeed Kekuls structure was correct this indicates that the alternating double Carbon-Carbon and single Carbon-Carbon bonds would have different lengths but when the bond lengths in a molecule in Benzene were calculated using the same technique they were all calculated to have the same length of 0.139nm therefore they can-not be alternating single and double Carbon-Carbon bonds providing evidence against Kekuls model of Benzene. Evidence 2 Number of Disubstituted Isomers

Fig. 3 The 2 possible Kekul structures

If Kekuls cyclotriene structure of Benzene was assumed correct four disubstituted isomers with a Chlorine molecule should be formed due to the reactive double Carbon-Carbon bonds. However when Benzene is reacted with a Chlorine molecule only 3 disubstituted isomers are formed and one monosubstituted product during experiments. This evidence suggests that Benzene does not contain double Carbon-Carbon bonds therefore disproving Kekuls structure of alternating double and single Carbon-Carbon bonds. Evidence 3 Thermo chemical evidence The calculated enthalpy of formation for one mole of gaseous Benzene with Kekuls structure from its constituent elements of Carbon and Hydrogen in their standard states is +252KJmol-1. However when the actual enthalpy of formation was tested it was considerably lower at a mere +82KJmol-1. This suggests that the structure of Benzene is significantly more stable than Kekuls model of Benzene. Further thermo chemical evidence against Kekuls model originates from the theoretical enthalpy change for the hydrogenation of Benzene when cyclohexene, with its one double Carbon-Carbon bond, undergoes hydrogenation (see fig. 2) the enthalpy change is -119.6KJmol-1. The theoretical enthalpy change for the hydrogenation of Benzene can therefore be calculated by multiplying the enthalpy change for the hydrogenation of cyclohexene by three due to the fact Kekuls model of Benzene suggests Benzene has three double Carbon-Carbon bonds resulting in a value of -358.8KJmol-1.

Fig. 4 The structure of the Benzene molecule

However in practice the enthalpy change for the hydrogenation of Benzene is substantially lower at -208.4KJmol-1 suggesting the addition of hydrogen across a double Carbon-Carbon bond is not occurring thus disproving Kekuls model for the structure of Benzene. Conclusion The accumulation of evidence against Kekuls struc-ture of Benzene lead to a new structure to be pro-posed by Linus Pauling. His idea was to treat the struc-ture of the Benzene molecule as if it were half way between the 2 possible Kekul structures. (fig.3)

His idea resulted the currently accepted structure of the Benzene molecule (fig.4) with a ring of delocalized electrons within a hexagonal skeleton of carbon atoms to which hydrogen atoms are attached accounting for the intermediate Carbon-Carbon bond lengths in Benzene, its relative lack of reactivity and its high stability.

Fig. 5 The structure of benzene

Bibliography

Heinemann Advanced science Chemistry pg. 421. Collins advanced modular science Chemistry A2 pg. 74.

Iconography

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk http://www.daviddarling.co.uk http://www.scienceaid.com http://www.paykin.info/irina/homework_5.php

> Benzene and its evidence

Fig. 1 Kekules proposed structure of alternating single and double bonds

During a drug induced daze in 1858, Friedrick Kekule stumbled on his theory of the benzene structure and it seemed a simple solution to the mind boggling molecule of Mr 78. He proposed that six carbon atoms were joined by a ring of alternating double bonds and single bonds. Each carbon atom in benzene was bonded to a hydrogen atom and this was otherwise referred to as a cyclohexatri-1,3,5-ene structure. Kekule went on to conclude that these alternating bonds constantly oscillated so that benzene was actually made up of two rings with different alternative carboncarbon bonds, which were on opposite sides of equilibrium. Yet, this posed problems as the theoretical properties of Kekules crazy compound were completely contradictory to the observed properties. These properties included:

the chemical bonding properties the shape the stability

Fig. 2 The modern theory of overlapping p-orbitals

However, over 150 years later, with an abundance of more modern analytical techniques (and significantly less opium in our systems!), we can prove that each carbon atom in benzene has a p -orbital of completely delocalized electrons. This overlap, giving rise to a planar structure, although Kekules cyclic structure laid the foundations for modern chemists, it was actually incorrect. Rather than two oscillating structures, we now know that benzene does have two different structures but these coexist as an intermediate with a lower energy than either of the two. None of the contributor structures are observed in benzenes actual electron structure a theory which is known as resonance hybridisation. But how did the boffins prove this? Kekules big mistake was his idea of alternating double and single carbon-carbon bonds, which would suggest that bonds in benzene were of different lengths. Single carbon-carbon bonds are known to be 0.154 nm long while double bonds are much shorter at 0.133nm. However, when benzene is cooled it crystallises and x-ray diffraction can be used to measure the bond lengths, which in benzene are all found to be 0.139nm. Therefore, Kekules proposal of alternating single and double bonds is impossible.

Fig. 3 Kekules idea of oscillating structures

In X-ray diffraction, X-rays meet a crystal, they interact with electrons and they are then scattered. The distribution of electron charge in a crystal molecule can be determined from the pattern of scattered rays. An X-ray examination of benzene can be carried out and may produce a complicated pattern of different intensity reflections. From this, an electron density contour map can be obtained, which, in the past, was extremely difficult to plot but is far easier today due to modern computing equipment. Peaks can be drawn into the map of the molecule and in benzenes case a symmetrical hexagonal shape carbon-carbon bonds can be seen. What is important is that all six of these bonds appear to be the same length. Hydrogen atoms are observed less clearly in an electron density map due to their weaker X-ray scattering.

Fig. 4 The accepted theory of resonance

In 1928, Kathleen Lonsdale used this technique to identify Kekules hexagonal shaped benzene structure as being correct. However, conversely she found a clear difference in length between aromatic carbon-carbon bonds and ordinary aliphatic carbon-carbon bonds, which disregarded Kekules idea of alternating single and double carboncarbon bonds. Another issue for scientists of the 20th century was that Kekules model meant that the benzene ring, like all other molecules, had a centre of symmetry. Yet, by means of long wave spectroscopy, this is contradicted. Within long wave spectroscopy there are two spectrums - useful in this case infra-red absorption and the Raman scattering spectrum. The first of these, infra red light, can be directed at any molecule causing a surge of electrons and a periodic variation in the dipole. If the molecule already has a naturally occurring vibration in its sequence of bonds, and if the light waves have a complementary frequency to this oscillation, the light waves will strongly stimulate the vibrations in the molecule. This will release energy, which will be displayed as bands of the absorption spectrum and are symmetric. The second involves ultra-violet or near visible light, which usually sets up a constant rapid dipole variation when directed at a molecule. This radiates a scattered secondary ray of the same frequency as the incident ray. However, molecules with a periodic variation in electric elasticity will fluctuate in their amplitude of radiation, hence recording a steady beat in the Raman spectra, which is asymmetric. Of course, in some special cases, molecules have to be awkward and over complicate things by excluding waves in either of these spectrum for example carbon dioxide due to the selection rule. However, the average molecule shows each vibration in no more and no less than one of the two spectra. Therefore, all of them are proven to have a centre of symmetry except benzene.

Fig. 5 A comparison of the Raman spectrum and the infrared spectrum in BENZENE, where identical waves can occur in both spectra

Fig. 6 A comparison of the Raman spectrum and the infrared spectrum in WATER with a centre of symmetry

Benzene actually has waves in both of these spectra with old records showing up to twelve different frequencies of incident rays from benzene appearing in both the Raman spectrum and the infrared spectrum. This means that Kekules regular hexagonal structure is wrong as benzene does not appear to have a centre of symmetry. Between 1938 and 1939, in the Bakerian Lecture, which was published from the Royal Society of London, Christopher Kelk Ingold described how he and his team extended this idea using comparisons with deuterium (heavy hydrogen) isotopes of benzene. When long wave spectroscopy analysis was carried out on heavy benzene and benzene, although waves in one spectrum were at different frequencies to the other, the coexisting waves in both the Raman spectrum and the infrared spectrum remained the same.

Fig. 7 Electron density map of benzene

Therefore, waves appearing on both spectra of a benzene molecule were not simply different waves with the same frequency that were indistinguishable; they were actually the same wave. The reason for benzenes lack of symmetry was further investigated using liquid benzene and it was concluded that the overlapping vibrations and intermolecular forces distorted the equilibrium of benzenes two resonance structures, which destroys the centre of symmetry. It is important to question the stability of benzene in Kekules structure too, because when benzene hydrogenation is observed, the actual enthalpy energy released is far less than what is expected. The hypothetical value for the hydrogenation of benzene, based on Kekules structure, can be easily worked out on a calculator, safely behind your desk using Hess Law. Remember that the enthalpy of a reaction is independent of the route thats followed, provided the products and reactants are the same.

Fig. 8 Diagram showing the enthalpy of hydrogenation and delocalised (resonance) energy for benzene

Therefore, we can add together the known enthalpy of formations for the bonds broken in cyclohexa-1, 2, 3-triene (Kekules version of the benzene electron arrangement) and the bonds in three hydrogen molecules. The resulting cyclohexane molecules enthalpy of formation is then subtracted from the energy released when bonds were broken to give the theoretical enthalpy of hydrogenation for benzene. In this process -359.2KJ/mol is calculated as the enthalpy of hydrogenation. Alternatively we can measure the actual hydrogenation enthalpy of benzene by reacting benzene with hydrogen in the presence of a transition metal catalyst. Calorimetry then reveals the true hydrogenation enthalpy of benzene to be -208.5KJ/mol. The difference between the observed and the expected enthalpy of formation is known as the resonance energy or delocalisation energy. Because of the relatively large delocalisation energy it is suggested that benzene is a stable, delocalised molecule, unlike the unstable Kekule structure. Therefore, scientists now think that there must be an equal spread of electrons around the molecule, giving rise to the overlapping orbitals of electrons in benzene. Due to benzenes high delocalisation energy, we can explain why benzene does not easily undergo electrophillic substitution reactions with bromine. Normally, it would be expected for an unsaturated hydrocarbon like benzene to turn bromine water brown, indicating the presence of double carbon-carbon bonds. However, this is not the case as no single carbon atom has enough electron density to polarise a non-polar molecule, such as bromine. In addition, while it is possible for benzene to react in the presence of an aluminium chloride catalyst with chlorine, only one monosubstituted and three disubstituted chlorobenzene molecules are produced. As a result, we can confirm that benzene does not have alternating single and

Fig. 9 An electron diffraction pattern of benzene

double carbon-carbon bonds. A further process that can be used to prove that Kekule had the right idea with his hexagonal structure of benzene is electron diffraction. This was discovered at around the same time as X-ray diffraction. It involves zapping a molecule in the gas phase with an electron beam under low pressure. Atoms in the molecule scatterthe rays and, by substituting into a series of complex equations, doing some number crunching and then measuring angles, an electron diffraction pattern can be produced. When this method is extended to benzene, it provides evidence that there are four possible distances between a carbon atom and a hydrogen atom within a molecule and three separate interatomic distances between carbon atoms. Scientists can draw a molecule of benzene to support Kekules

hexagonal structure based upon the information in benzenes electron diffraction pattern, despite shredding to pieces the rest of Kekules structure!

Fig. 10 The dream of whirling snakes, of the structure of benzene

To conclude, while Kekule may have got his alternating bond theory in benzene wrong, he certainly laid the foundation for scientists such as Kathleen Lonsdale. If Newton stood on the shoulders of giants, then Kekule was most certainly a giant for others to stand on even if we do give him and his theory a kick now and then with modern analytical techniques! To conclude, scientist August Wilhelm von Hofmann summed up the Kekule structure perfectly: I would trade all my experimental works for the single idea of the benzene theory. Bibliography

A-Level Chemistry by E.N Ramsden Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Volume 169 (1938-1939): The Bakerian Lecture by C. K. Ingold Investigation of Molecular Structure by Bruce Gilbert

Iconography

http://www.chemgapedia.de http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.chemguide.co.uk http://catchingchenistry.blogspot.com http://www.todayinsci.com