Dss 10
Dss 10
Dss 10
2012
1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. 8. 8. 9. 9.
6/47
Some major modeling issues Some major modeling issues Representative Techniques
Decision tables, decision tree Linear programming models, network models Some inventory models
Several types of simulation Heuristic programming, expert systems Forecasting models, Markov analysis Financial modeling, waiting lines
7/47
8/47
One recent trend in modeling involves the development of model libraries and One recent trend in modeling involves the development of model libraries and solution technique libraries. Some of these codes can be run directly on the solution technique libraries. Some of these codes can be run directly on the owners web server for free, and others can be downloaded and run on an owners web server for free, and others can be downloaded and run on an individuals PC, Unix machine, or server. The availability of these codes means individuals PC, Unix machine, or server. The availability of these codes means that powerful optimization and simulation package are available to decision makers that powerful optimization and simulation package are available to decision makers who may have only experienced these tools from the perspective of classroom who may have only experienced these tools from the perspective of classroom problems. problems. There is clear trend toward developing and using Web tools and software to There is aa clear trend toward developing and using Web tools and software to access and even run software to perform modeling, optimization, simulation, and so access and even run software to perform modeling, optimization, simulation, and so on. This has, in many ways, simplified the application of many models to realon. This has, in many ways, simplified the application of many models to realworld problems. Another trend, involves the lack of understanding of what models world problems. Another trend, involves the lack of understanding of what models and their solutions can do in the real world. and their solutions can do in the real world. There is continuing trend toward making MSS models completely transparent There is aa continuing trend toward making MSS models completely transparent to decision maker. For example, multidimensional analysis (modeling) involves to decision maker. For example, multidimensional analysis (modeling) involves data analysis in several dimensions. data analysis in several dimensions. There is also trend to model model to help in its analysis. An influence There is also aa trend to model aa model to help in its analysis. An influence diagram is graphical representation of model; that is, it is model of model. diagram is aagraphical representation of aamodel; that is, it is aamodel of aamodel. Some influence diagram software packages are capable of generating and solving Some influence diagram software packages are capable of generating and solving the resultant model. the resultant model.
9/47
13/47
Management Support Systems Modeling with Spreadsheets Management Support Systems Modeling with Spreadsheets
Models can be developed and implemented in variety of programming Models can be developed and implemented in aa variety of programming languages and systems: from third-, fourth-, and fifth-generation to computer aided languages and systems: from third-, fourth-, and fifth-generation to computer aided software engineering (CASE) systems and other systems that automatically software engineering (CASE) systems and other systems that automatically generate usable software. We focus primarily on spreadsheets, model languages, generate usable software. We focus primarily on spreadsheets, model languages, and transparent data analysis tools the most popular end-user modeling tool. and transparent data analysis tools the most popular end-user modeling tool. Spreadsheets include extensive statistical, forecasting, and other modeling and Spreadsheets include extensive statistical, forecasting, and other modeling and database management capabilities, functions, and routines Solver, Whats Best, database management capabilities, functions, and routines ((Solver, Whats Best, Braincel, NeuralTools, Evolver,@Risk @Risk). Braincel, NeuralTools, Evolver, @Risk).
Loan Calculation Model Loan Amount Interest Rate Number of Years Number of Month Interest Rate/Month Monthly Loan Payment $150,000 8.00% 30 360 0.67% -$1,100.65
Month 0 1 2 3 4 5 $1,100.65 $1,100.65 $1,100.65 $1,100.65 $1,100.65 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $1,200.65 $1,200.65 $1,200.65 $1,200.65 $1,200.65 Normal Paym.
Dynamic Model
$100.00 Prepay Amount Total Payment Principale Owed $150,000 $149,799.35 $149,597.37 $149,394.04 $149,189.35 $148,983.30
14/47
5. Decision Tables 5. Decision Tables The problem is to select the one best investment alternative. These are assumed The problem is to select the one best investment alternative. These are assumed to be discrete alternatives. to be discrete alternatives. The investment decision-making problem can be viewed as two-person game. The investment decision-making problem can be viewed as aatwo-person game. the investor makes choice (a move), and then state of nature occurs (makes the investor makes aa choice (a move), and then aa state of nature occurs (makes aa move). The next table shows the payoff of mathematical model. The table move). The next table shows the payoff of aa mathematical model. The table includes decision variables (the alternatives), uncontrollable variables, and result includes decision variables (the alternatives), uncontrollable variables, and result variables (the project yields). variables (the project yields). Investment Problem Decision Table Model State of Nature (Un controllable Variables)
-
The most common method for solving this risk analysis problem is to select the The most common method for solving this risk analysis problem is to select the alternative with the greatest expected value. alternative with the greatest expected value. Assume that the experts estimate the chance of solid growth at 50%, the chance of Assume that the experts estimate the chance of solid growth at 50%, the chance of stagnation at 30%, and the chance of inflation at 20%. The decision table is then stagnation at 30%, and the chance of inflation at 20%. The decision table is then rewritten with the known probabilities (see next table). An expected value is rewritten with the known probabilities (see next table). An expected value is computed by multiplying the results (outcomes) by their respective probabilities computed by multiplying the results (outcomes) by their respective probabilities and adding them. For example, investing in bonds yields an expected return of and adding them. For example, investing in bonds yields an expected return of 12(0,5)+6(0.3)+3(0.2)=8.4%. (This approach can be dangerous strategy!) 12(0,5)+6(0.3)+3(0.2)=8.4%. (This approach can be aadangerous strategy!) Decision Under Risk and its Solution Solid Growth Alternative Bonds Stocks CDs 50.0% 12.0% 15.0% 6.5% Stagnation 30.0% 6.0% 3.0% 6.5% Inflation 20.0% 3.0% -2.0% 6.5% Expected Value 8.4% 8.0% 6.5%
18/47
6. Decision Trees 6. Decision Trees A simplified investment case of multiple goals (a decision situation in which A simplified investment case of multiple goals (a decision situation in which alternatives are evaluated with several, sometimes conflicting, goal) is shown in alternatives are evaluated with several, sometimes conflicting, goal) is shown in next table. next table.
Multiple Goals Alternative Bonds Stocks CDs Yield
8.4% 8.0% 6.5%
Safety
High Low Very High
Liquidity
High High High
The three goals criteria) are yield, safety, liquidity This situation is under liquidity. The three goals ((criteria) are yield, safety, liquidity. This situation is under criteria assumed certainty; that is, only one possible consequence is projected for each assumed certainty; that is, only one possible consequence is projected for each alternative; the more complex cases of risk or uncertainty could be considered. alternative; the more complex cases of risk or uncertainty could be considered. some of the results are qualitative (e.g. low, high) rather than numeric. some of the results are qualitative (e.g. low, high) rather than numeric.
20/47
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models
All models are made up of four components: result, decision, uncontrollable, All models are made up of four components: result, decision, uncontrollable, and intermediate result variables: and intermediate result variables:
Uncontrollable Variables Uncontrollable Variables Decision Variables Decision Variables Mathematical Relationships Mathematical Relationships Intermediate Variables Intermediate Variables Result Variables Result Variables
Mathematical Relationships link these components together. The modeling Mathematical Relationships link these components together. The modeling process involves identifying the variables and relationships among them. Solving process involves identifying the variables and relationships among them. Solving aa model determines the values of these and the result variables. model determines the values of these and the result variables.
21/47
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models
Result (Outcome) Variables Result (Outcome) Variables Result (outcome) variables reflect the level of effectiveness of system; that is, Result (outcome) variables reflect the level of effectiveness of aasystem; that is, they indicate how well the system performs or attains its goal. they indicate how well the system performs or attains its goal. Result variables (outputs) are considered dependent variables. Result variables (outputs) are considered dependent variables. Intermediate result variables are sometimes used in modeling to identify Intermediate result variables are sometimes used in modeling to identify intermediate outcomes. intermediate outcomes. In the case of dependent variable, another event must occur first before the In the case of aa dependent variable, another event must occur first before the event described by the variable can occur. event described by the variable can occur. Result variables depend on the occurrence of the decision variables and the Result variables depend on the occurrence of the decision variables and the uncontrollable variables. uncontrollable variables.
22/47
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
Result (Outcome) Variables Result (Outcome) Variables The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models
Decision Variables
Result Variables Total profit, risk Rate of return of investment Earnings per share Liquidity level Market share Customer satisfaction Total cost Quality level Employee satisfaction Data processing cost Error rate Total transport cost Payment float time Customer satisfaction
Advertising budget Where to advertise What and how much to produce Inventory levels Compensation programs Use of computers Audit schedule Shipments schedules Use smart cards Staffing levels
Customers income Competitors actions Machine capacity Technology Materials prices Computer technology Tax rates Legal requirements Delivery distance Regulations Demand for services
23/47
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models
Decision Variables Decision Variables Decision variables describe alternative courses of action. Decision variables describe alternative courses of action. The decision maker controls the decision variables. The decision maker controls the decision variables. For example, for an investment problem, the amount to invest in bonds is For example, for an investment problem, the amount to invest in bonds is aa decision variable. decision variable. In scheduling problem, the decision variables are people, times, and schedule. In aascheduling problem, the decision variables are people, times, and schedule. Other examples are listed in the next table. Other examples are listed in the next table.
24/47
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
Decision Variables Decision Variables The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models Examples of the Components of Models
Decision Variables Investment alternatives and amounts Advertising budget Where to advertise What and how much to produce Inventory levels Compensation programs Use of computers Audit schedule Shipments schedules Use smart cards Staffing levels
Result Variables Total profit, risk Rate of return of investment Earnings per share Liquidity level Market share Customer satisfaction Total cost Quality level Employee satisfaction Data processing cost Error rate Total transport cost Payment float time Customer satisfaction
Uncontrollable Variables and Parameters Inflation rate Prime rate Competition Customers income Competitors actions Machine capacity Technology Materials prices Computer technology Tax rates Legal requirements Delivery distance Regulations Demand for services
25/47
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models
Uncontrollable Variables, or Parameters Uncontrollable Variables, or Parameters In any decision-making situation, there are factors that affect the result In any decision-making situation, there are factors that affect the result variables but are not under the control of the decision maker. Either these factors variables but are not under the control of the decision maker. Either these factors can be fixed, in which case they are called uncontrollable variables, or parameters, can be fixed, in which case they are called uncontrollable variables, or parameters, or they can vary, in which case they are called variables. or they can vary, in which case they are called variables. Examples of factors are the prime interest rate, citys building code, tax Examples of factors are the prime interest rate, aa citys building code, tax regulations, and utilities costs. Most of these factors are uncontrollable because regulations, and utilities costs. Most of these factors are uncontrollable because they are in and determined by elements of the system environment in which the they are in and determined by elements of the system environment in which the decision maker works. Some of these variables limit the decision maker and decision maker works. Some of these variables limit the decision maker and therefore form what are called the constrains of the problem. therefore form what are called the constrains of the problem.
26/47
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
Decision Variables Decision Variables The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models Examples of the Components of Models
Decision Variables
Result Variables Total profit, risk Rate of return of investment Earnings per share Liquidity level Market share Customer satisfaction Total cost Quality level Employee satisfaction
Uncontrollable Variables and Parameters Inflation rate Prime rate Competition Customers income Competitors actions Machine capacity Technology Materials prices Computer technology Tax rates Legal requirements Delivery distance Regulations Demand for services
27/47
Investment alternatives and amounts Advertising budget Where to advertise What and how much to produce Inventory levels Compensation programs
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models
Intermediate Result Variables Intermediate Result Variables Intermediate result variable reflect intermediate outcomes in mathematical Intermediate result variable reflect intermediate outcomes in mathematical models. models. For example, in determining machine scheduling, spoilage is an For example, in determining machine scheduling, spoilage is an intermediate result variable, and total profit is the result variable (i.e., spoilage intermediate result variable, and total profit is the result variable (i.e., spoilage is one determinant of total profit). is one determinant of total profit). Another example is employee salaries. This constitutes decision variable Another example is employee salaries. This constitutes aa decision variable for management. It determines employee satisfaction (i.e., intermediate for management. It determines employee satisfaction (i.e., intermediate outcome), which in turn determines the productivity level (i.e., final result). outcome), which in turn determines the productivity level (i.e., final result).
28/47
7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support 7. The structure of Mathematical Models for Decision Support
The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models The Components of decision Support Mathematical Models
The structure of MSS Mathematical Models The structure of MSS Mathematical Models The component of quantitative model are linked together by mathematical The component of aa quantitative model are linked together by mathematical (algebraic) expressions equations or inequalities. (algebraic) expressions equations or inequalities. A very simple financial model is A very simple financial model is where P = profit, R = revenue, and C = cost. This equation describes the where P = profit, R = revenue, and C = cost. This equation describes the relationship among the variables. relationship among the variables. Another well-known financial model is the simple present-value cash flow Another well-known financial model is the simple present-value cash flow model, where P = present value, F = future single payment in dollars, = interest model, where P = present value, F = aafuture single payment in dollars, ii= interest rate (percent-age), and = number of years. With this model it is possible to rate (percent-age), and nn = number of years. With this model it is possible to determine the present value of payment of $100,000 to be made five years from determine the present value of aapayment of $100,000 to be made five years from today, at 10% (0.1) interest rate, as follows: today, at aa10% (0.1) interest rate, as follows: P = 100,000 (1+0.1)5 = $62,092 P = 100,000 //(1+0.1)5 = $62,092
29/47
P=RC P=RC
30/47
An example of modeling in LP: An example of modeling in LP: The decision variables The decision variables :: X= units of CC-7 X11=units of CC-7 X= units of CC-8 X 2=units of CC-8
2
Total profit = Z Total profit = Z The objective is to maximize The objective is to maximize :: Z = 8,000X+12,000X Z = 8,000X11+12,000X2 2 The uncontrollable variables ((constraints):: The uncontrollable variables constraints) constraints Labor constrain: 300X+ 500X 200,000 Labor constrain: 300X 1+ 500X 2 200,000 Budget constrain: 10,000X+15,000X 8,000,000 Budget constrain: 10,000X11+15,000X2 8,000,000 2 Marketing requirement for CC-7: X 100 Marketing requirement for CC-7: X 1100 Marketing requirement for CC-8: X 200 Marketing requirement for CC-8: X22200
32/47
1 1 2
Mathematical Mathematical Relationships Relationships Maximize Z (profit) Maximize Z (profit) subject to constraints subject to constraints Constraints Constraints (Uncontrollable) (Uncontrollable)
300X+500X 200,000 300X11+500X2 200,000 2 100X+1,5000X 8,000,000 100X11+1,5000X2 8,000,000 2 X 100 X11100 X 200 X 2200
2
33/47
X1 Decision Variables: Total Profit: Labor: Budget: X1 lower: X2 lower: 333.33 8.00 0.30 10.00 1.00 0.00
X2 200.00 12.00 0.50 15.00 0.00 1.00 5,066.67 200.00 6,333.33 333.33 200.00 200.00 8,000.00 100.00 200.00
34/47
The Excel Solver Answer Report is The Excel Solver Answer Report is::
Microsoft Excel 11.0 Answer Report Worksheet: [PL.xls]PL Report Created: 12/13/2009 7:57:12 PM
Target Cell (Max) Cell $E$7 Total Profit Name Original Value 5,066.67 Final Value 5,066.67
Adjustable Cells Cell $C$6 $D$6 Name Decision Variables: X1 Decision Variables: X2 Original Value 333.33 200.00 Final Value 333.33 200.00
Constraints Cell $E$8 $E$9 $E$10 $E$11 Labor: Budget: X1 lower: X2 lower: Name Cell Value 200.00 6,333.33 333.33 200.00 Formula $E$8<=$F$8 $E$9<=$F$9 $E$10>=$F$10 $E$11>=$F$11 Status Binding Not Binding Not Binding Binding Slack 0 1666.666667 233.33 0.00
35/47
The Excel Solver Sensitivity Report is The Excel Solver Sensitivity Report is::
Microsoft Excel 11.0 Sensitivity Report Worksheet: [PL.xls]PL Report Created: 12/13/2009 7:57:12 PM
Adjustable Cells Final Cell $C$6 $D$6 Decision Variables: X1 Decision Variables: X2 Name Value 333.33 200.00 Reduced Gradient 0.00 0.00
Constraints Final Cell $E$8 $E$9 $E$10 $E$11 Labor: Budget: X1 lower: X2 lower: Name Value 200.00 6,333.33 333.33 200.00 Lagrange Multiplier 26.67 0.00 0.00 -1.33
36/47
The Excel Solver Limits Report is The Excel Solver Limits Report is::
Microsoft Excel 11.0 Limits Report Worksheet: [PL.xls]Limits Report 2 Report Created: 12/13/2009 7:57:12 PM
Adjustable Cell $C$6 $D$6 Name Decision Variables: X1 Decision Variables: X2 Value 333.33 200.00
37/47
The most common optimization models can be solved by variety of The most common optimization models can be solved by aa variety of mathematical programmingmethods including the following: methods, mathematical programming methods, including the following: Assignment (best matching of objects) Assignment (best matching of objects) Dynamic programming Dynamic programming Goal programming Goal programming Investment (maximizing rate of return) Investment (maximizing rate of return) Linear and integer programming Linear and integer programming Network models for planning and scheduling Network models for planning and scheduling Nonlinear programming Nonlinear programming Replacement (capital budgeting) Replacement (capital budgeting) Simple inventory models (e.g., economic order quantity) Simple inventory models (e.g., economic order quantity) Transportation (minimize cost of shipments) Transportation (minimize cost of shipments)
38/47
9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, 9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking
Multiple Goals Multiple Goals
Todays management systems are more complex, and one with single goals is Todays management systems are more complex, and one with aasingle goals is rare managers want to attain simultaneousgoals some of which may conflict. goals, rare -- managers want to attain simultaneous goals, some of which may conflict. It is usually necessary to transform multiple-goal problem into singleIt is usually necessary to transform aa multiple-goal problem into aa singlemeasure-of-effectiveness problem before comparing the effects of the solutions measure-of-effectiveness problem before comparing the effects of the solutions (handling multiple goals in LP model goal programming model). (handling multiple goals in aaLP model goal programming model). Methods of handling multiple goals used when working with MSS: Methods of handling multiple goals used when working with MSS: Utility theory Utility theory Goal programming Goal programming Expression of goals as constraints, using LP Expression of goals as constraints, using LP A point system A point system With some methods, the decision maker needs to search the solution space for With some methods, the decision maker needs to search the solution space for an alternative that provides for required attainment of all goals while searching for an alternative that provides for required attainment of all goals while searching for an efficient solution. an efficient solution.
39/47
9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking 9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking
9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking 9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking
Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis are used for: Sensitivity analysis are used for: Revising models to eliminate too-large sensitivities Revising models to eliminate too-large sensitivities Adding details about sensitive variables or scenarios Adding details about sensitive variables or scenarios Obtaining better estimates of sensitive external variables Obtaining better estimates of sensitive external variables Accepting and using the sensitive (and hence vulnerable) real world, leading Accepting and using the sensitive (and hence vulnerable) real world, leading to continuous and close monitoring of actual results to continuous and close monitoring of actual results The robustness of decisions under changing conditions. The robustness of decisions under changing conditions.
9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking 9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking
What-If Analysis What-If Analysis What-if analysis is structured as What will happen to the solution if an input What-if analysis is structured as What will happen to the solution if an input
variable, an assumption, or parameter value is changed? variable, an assumption, or aaparameter value is changed?
a = 2.50 x y f(x,y) g(x,y) h(x,y) $100.00 $200.00 $600.00 $325.00 $215.00 $110.00 $220.00 $660.00 $357.50 $236.50 b = 1.75 $121.00 $242.00 $726.00 $393.25 $260.15 $133.10 $266.20 $798.60 $432.58 $286.17
opportunity to change their answers to some of the systems questions, and opportunity to change their answers to some of the systems questions, and aa revised recommendation is found. revised recommendation is found.
42/47
What-if analysis is common in expert systems Users are given the systems. What-if analysis is common in expert systems. Users are given the
9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking 9. Multiple Goals, Sensitivity Analysis, What-If Analysis, and Goal Seeking
Goal seeking calculates the values of the inputs necessary to achieve desired Goal seeking calculates the values of the inputs necessary to achieve aadesired
The following are some The following are some examples of goalseeking seeking: examples of goal seeking: What annual budget is needed What annual budget is needed for an annual growth rate of for an annual growth rate of 15% by 2009? 15% by 2009? How many nurses are needed How many nurses are needed to reduce the average waiting to reduce the average waiting time of patient in the time of aa patient in the emergency room to less than 10 emergency room to less than 10 minutes? minutes?
43/47
Stop Testing
Stop when no improvement is possible Comparisons: Stop when all alternatives are checked Comparisons, simulation: Stop when solution is good enough Stop when solution is good enough
Solution
Optimal (best) Optimal (best) Best among alternatives checked Good enough
44/47
Search Approaches
Blind Search
Heuristics
Algorithms Algorithms
Analytical Techniques Analytical Techniques may use algorithms to may use algorithms to increase the efficiency of increase the efficiency of the search. An algorithm the search. An algorithm is step-by-step search is step-by-step search process for obtaining an process for obtaining an optimal solution. optimal solution.
Is improvement possible in proposed solution? Improve solution. generate a new proposed solution.
No
Solution is optimal
End
Yes
45/47
Efraim Turban, Jay E. Aronson, Ting-Peng Liang, Ramesh Sharda Efraim Turban, Jay E. Aronson, Ting-Peng Liang, Ramesh Sharda Pearson Pretince Hall, New Jersey, 2007 Pearson Pretince Hall, New Jersey, 2007
Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems
End of 10.
References References
1. Baker, D., Bridges, D., Hunter, R., Johnson, G., Krupa, J., Murphy, J. and Sorenson, K. (2002) Guidebook to 1. Baker, D., Bridges, D., Hunter, R., Johnson, G., Krupa, J., Murphy, J. and Sorenson, K. (2002) Guidebook to Decision- Making Methods, WSRC-IM-2002-00002, Department of Energy, USA. http://emiDecision- Making Methods, WSRC-IM-2002-00002, Department of Energy, USA. http://emiweb.inel.gov/Nissmg/Guidebook_2002.pdf web.inel.gov/Nissmg/Guidebook_2002.pdf 2. Averill M. Law, W. David Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3/ed ,0070592926, 2000 2. Averill M. Law, W. David Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3/ed ,0070592926, 2000 3. Alvin E. Roth, Marilda A. Oliveira Sotomayor, Two-sided matching: study in game-theoretic modeling and 3. Alvin E. Roth, Marilda A. Oliveira Sotomayor, Two-sided matching: aastudy in game-theoretic modeling and analysis, analysis, 4. Archishman Chakraborty, Alessandro Citanna, Michael Ostrovsky, Two-sided matching with interdependent 4. Archishman Chakraborty, Alessandro Citanna, Michael Ostrovsky, Two-sided matching with interdependent values, Schulich School of Business, York University, Toronto ON M3J 1P3, Canada, values, Schulich School of Business, York University, Toronto ON M3J 1P3, Canada, 5. Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems, Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems, 3rd Edition 5. Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems, Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems, 3rd Edition 6. Charles M. Close (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute), Dean K. Frederick (Unified Technologies, Inc.), Jonathan 6. Charles M. Close (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute), Dean K. Frederick (Unified Technologies, Inc.), Jonathan C. Newell (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute), ISBN: 978-0-471-39442-6, August 2001, 2002 C. Newell (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute), ISBN: 978-0-471-39442-6, August 2001, 2002 7. Sudipto Banerjee Alan Gelfand and Bradley Carlin, Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial 7. Sudipto Banerjee , ,Alan EE. .Gelfand , ,and Bradley PP. .Carlin, Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data, Chapman and Hall/CRC 2004, Print ISBN: 978-1-58488-410-1, eBook ISBN: 978-0-203-48780-8 Data, Chapman and Hall/CRC 2004, Print ISBN: 978-1-58488-410-1, eBook ISBN: 978-0-203-48780-8
. . . C10 / 6.12.2012
47/47