HINDU Sacred Word Hindu in Vedik Scriptures
HINDU Sacred Word Hindu in Vedik Scriptures
HINDU Sacred Word Hindu in Vedik Scriptures
1 2
The anti-Hindu historians like Romila Thapar and D.N. Jha have opined that
the word 'Hindu' was given currency by the Arabs in the 8th century. They
however, do not explain the basis of their conclusion nor do they cite any
evidence in support of their claim. Even Arab Muslim writers do not make such
an extravagant claim 3. Another theory propounded by European writers is that
the word 'Hindu' is a Persian corruption of 'Sindhu' resulting from the Persian
practice of replacing 'S' with 'H'. Even here, no evidence is cited. In fact the word
Persia itself contains 'S' which should have become 'Perhia' if this theory was
correct. The present paper examines the above two theories in the light of
epigraphic and litereary evidence available from Persian, Indian, Greek, Chinese
and Arabic sources. The evidence appears to support the conclusion that 'Hindu'
like 'Sindhu', has been in use since the Vedic age and that although 'Hindu' is a
modified form of 'Sindhu', its origin lies in the Saurashtran practice of
pronouncing 'H' in place of 'S'.
1. Epigraphic Evidence :
are three figures above which are inscribed 'iyam Qataguviya' (this is Satygidian),
'iyam Ga(n)dariya' (this is Gandhara) and 'iyam Hi(n)duviya' (this is Hi(n)du).
The Asokan inscriptions (3rd century B.C.)5, repeatedly use expressions like
'Hida' (fgn) for 'India' and 'Hida loka' (fgn yksd) for 'Indian nation'. 'Hida' and its
derivative forms are used more than 70 times in the Ashokan inscriptions. For
instance in the Jaugadha, separate rock edict II, the lines 3 &4, read,
The Ashokan inscriptions establish the antiquity of the name 'Hind' for India to
atleast third century B.C.
In Persepolis Pahlvi inscriptions of Shahpur II (310 A.D.) the king has the titles
shakanshah hind shakastan u tuxaristan dabiran dabir, "king of Shakastan,
minister of ministers of Hind Shakastan and Tukharistan".6
The epigraphic evidence from the Achaemenid, Ashokan and Sasanian Pahlvi
records, puts a question mark on the theory about the term 'Hindu' having
originated in Arab usage in the 8th century A.D. Literary evidence takes the
antiquity of the word 'Hindu' back to atleast 1000 B.C. and possibly 5000 B.C.
2
Page 3 of 8
In the Avestan Gatha 'Shatir', 163rd Verse speaks of the visit of Veda Vyas to
the court of Gustashp and in the presence of Zorashtra, Veda Vyas introduces
himself saying 'man marde am Hind jijad' 8 - I am man born in 'Hind'. Veda Vyas
was an elder contemporary of Shri Krishna (3100 B.C.).
3. Greek Usage
The Greek term 'Indoi' is a softened form of 'Hindu' where the initial 'H' was
dropped as the Greek alphabet has no aspirate9. This term 'Indoi' was used in
Greek literature by Hekataeus (late 6th century B.C.) and Herodotus (early 5th
century B.C.) 9, thus establishing that the Greeks were using this derivative of
'Hindu' as early as 6th century B.C.
The Hebrew bible uses 'Hodu' 10 for India, which is a Judaic form of 'Hindu'. The
Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) is considered earlier than 300 B.C.10 Today's
Hebrew spoken in Israel also uses Hodu for India.
The Chinese used the term 'Hien-tu' for 'Hindu' about 100 B.C.11 While
describing movements of the Sai-Wang (100 B.C.), the Chinese annals state that
the Sai-Wang went towards the South and passing Hien-tu reached Ki-Pin11.
3
Page 4 of 8
Later Chinese travellers Fa-Hien (5th century A.D.) and Huen-Tsang (7th century
12
A.D.) use a slightly modified term 'Yintu' but the affinity to 'Hindu' is still
retained. This term 'Yintu' continues to be used till today 13.
The same anthology has another poem by Labi-bin-e Akhtab bin-e Turfa who is
dated 2300 before Mohammed i.e. 1700 B.C. This poem also uses 'Hind' for
India and 'Hindu' for Indian. The poem also mentions the four Vedas Sama,
Yajur, Rig and Athar. This poem is quoted on columns in the Laxmi Narayan
Mandir in New Delhi, popularly known as Birla Mandir (Temple) 8. Some verses14
are as follows:
4
Page 5 of 8
Another doubt created by the modern day anglicized historian is that the term
'Hindu' is not found used in Sanskrit literature. This misconception can be
dispelled by quoting from Sanskrit works15 :
Meru tantra (es#rU=) (4th to 6th century A.D.), a Shaiva text, comments on 'Hindu'.
ghua
gh p nw";R;so fgUnqfjR;qP;rs fiz;As
(Hindu is one who discards the mean and the ignoble.)
5
Page 6 of 8
ghua
gh nw"k;fRk bfr fgUnwA
6
Page 7 of 8
Similarly other Sanskrit works which use the term 'Hindu' are, Kalika Puran,
8,15
Bhavishya Puran, Adbhut Kosh, Medini Kosh, Ram Kosh etc . Even Kalidas
16
has used a derivative form 'Haindava' .
Another theory says that 'Hindu' originated from the Persian practice of replacing
'S' with 'H'. This does not seem to be true is evident from the fact that Sindh has
not become Hind and both Sindh and Hind exist in Persian as well as Arabic. The
inscriptions of Darius and Xerexes which describe India as Hi(n)du, also use the
term 'Sugd' for Sogdiana. This 'Sugd' should have become 'Hugd' as per this
theory. The Pahlvi inscription of Shahpur II, uses 'S' in Shakastan and
Tuxaristan.
It should also be noted that as per Nirukta rules of grammar, in the Vedik
language, replacement of S with H is permitted 17.
9. Conclusion :
Epigraphic evidence takes the antiquity of 'Hindu' back to atleast 500 B.C. Use of
'Hindu' as part of 'Hapta-Hindu' in the Avesta suggests that 'Hindu' is as old as
'Sindhu' and therefore, belongs to the Vedic age.
7
Page 8 of 8
REFERENCES: