Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 113 views

    Korchia Calcul Rho

    Uploaded by

    samichaouachi
    Model 1 fits the data significantly worse than Model 0 based on a chi-square difference test, suggesting the additional constraints in Model 1 lower the fit. If Model 1 fits significantly worse, Model 0 should be preferred; if there is no significant difference, Model 1 is preferred due to its parsimony.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Korchia Calcul Rho

    Uploaded by

    samichaouachi
    113 views12 pages
    Model 1 fits the data significantly worse than Model 0 based on a chi-square difference test, suggesting the additional constraints in Model 1 lower the fit. If Model 1 fits significantly worse, Model 0 should be preferred; if there is no significant difference, Model 1 is preferred due to its parsimony.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Model 1 fits the data significantly worse than Model 0 based on a chi-square difference test, suggesting the additional constraints in Model 1 lower the fit. If Model 1 fits significantly worse, Model 0 should be preferred; if there is no significant difference, Model 1 is preferred due to its parsimony.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    113 views12 pages

    Korchia Calcul Rho

    Uploaded by

    samichaouachi
    Model 1 fits the data significantly worse than Model 0 based on a chi-square difference test, suggesting the additional constraints in Model 1 lower the fit. If Model 1 fits significantly worse, Model 0 should be preferred; if there is no significant difference, Model 1 is preferred due to its parsimony.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 12

    Chi-Square

    Chi-Square difference test


    Chi-Square ddl p
    Model 0 36.6 33 30.52%
    Model 1 43.14 35 16.24%
    Chi-Square 6.54 2 3.80%

    You just need to fill in B4, C4, B5, & C5 (ie, the cells on a white background)
    Model 1 should be more constrained than model 0

    Page 1
    Chi-Square

    Test 3.80%
    model 0 is better. Risk: 5%
    Model 0 is better. Risk: 10%

    lls on a white background)

    If Model 0 is better, the fit of Model 1 is significantly lowered by the additional constraints
    If no model is better (test > 5% or 10%), you should usually use model 1

    Page 2
    Chi-Square

    the additional constraints

    Page 3
    Rel & Val

    lambda 1-lambda2
    LV--> item 1 0.75 0.438
    LV--> item 2 0.889 0.210
    LV--> item 3 0.817 0.333
    LV--> item 4 0.868 0.247
    LV--> item 5 0.735 0.460
    LV--> item 6 0.657 0.568
    LV--> item 7
    LV--> item 8
    LV--> item 9
    LV--> item 10
    3.746 sum (lambda2)
    2.254 sum (1-lambda)2
    Just fill in this column 0.624 Rho vc
    22.241 Sum lambda2
    0.908 Joreskog rho

    Page 4
    Rel & Val

    =AVE: average variance extracted (=d5/k): convergent validity if >0,5


    (Check also that Lambda's c.r. are significative & that smc>0,5

    Construct reliability

    Ref. : Fornell, C. & D. F. Larcker (1981), Evaluating Structural Equations Models with
    Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research , 18, 39-
    50.

    Page 5
    GammaHat & RMSEA

    Chi-deux df n p
    329 76 494 44

    Enter your values here

    Page 6
    GammaHat & RMSEA

    Fhat GammaHat Adjusted GammaHat


    0.513 0.977 0.703
    Steiger's 1980 GammaHat

    RMSEA Lo 0.072
    RMSEA 0.082
    RMSEA Hi 0.091

    Moschopoulos' (1984) approximation is used to compute the RMSEA confidence interval. Se


    Moschopoulos, Panagis G. (1984), "On a New Transformation to Normality," Communications in Stati
    http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9505&L=semnet&P=R6799&I=1

    Page 7
    LV with 1 item

    indicator standard-deviation lambda must be fixed at


    0.980 0.931

    You just need to fill in B3

    Ref.: Anderson, J. C. & D. W. Gerbing (1988), Structural Equation Modeling in Practice : A Review and Recommended Tw

    Page 8
    LV with 1 item

    uniqueness fixed at
    0.096

    ce : A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3, 411-423.

    Page 9
    Cronbach's alpha
    number of items 5 0.833
    average correlation between items 0.500

    What if I remove 2 items with the "same" correlation with the others?
    Alpha becomes ,,, 0.750
    number of items becomes ,,, 3

    What if I remove 1 item with the "same" correlation with the others?
    Alpha becomes ,,, 0.800
    number of items becomes ,,, 4

    What if I add 1 item with the "same" correlation with the others?
    Alpha becomes ,,, 0.857
    number of items becomes ,,, 6

    What if I add 2 items with the "same" correlation with the others?
    Alpha becomes ,,, 0.875
    number of items becomes ,,, 7
    You just need to fill in B2 & B3
    By Michaël Korchia, marketing professor at BEM Bordeaux Management School

    www.watoowatoo.net/mk
    Thanks to all SEMnet contributors
    (comments welcome)
    Version 1.3.A, 25/03/10

    You might also like