Finextra Fintech Marketing Report 2014 110914

A FINEXTRA RESEARCH SURVEY
SPONSORED BY METIA GROUP

SEPTEMBER 2014
FINTECH MARKETING
REPORT 2014
AN ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONAL OBJECTIVES, ORGANISATION
STRUCTURE, DAY-TO-DAY CHALLENGES AND INVESTMENT PLANS
OF MARKETERS IN THE FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY SECTOR.
FINTECH MARKETING
REPORT 2014
AN ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONAL OBJECTIVES, ORGANISATION
STRUCTURE, DAY-TO-DAY CHALLENGES AND INVESTMENT PLANS
OF MARKETERS IN THE FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY SECTOR.
Finextra Research Ltd

101 St Martins Lane
London
WC2N 4AZ
United Kingdom
Telephone
+44 (0)20 3100 3670
Email
[email protected]
Web
www.finextra.com
All rights reserved.

No part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopy,
recording or any information storage
and retrieval system, without prior
permission in writing from the
publisher. Copyright Finextra
Research Ltd 2014
02
00
CONTENTS
1:1 Finextra Research ............................... 4

1:2 Metia Group ........................................... 4
1:3 Steve Ellis ............................................. 5
02 Background ............................................. 6

2:1 Objective ................................................ 6

2:2 Target audience ................................... 6
2:3 Methodology ......................................... 6
03 Context ....................................................... 7
04 Participating fintech
organisations ...........................................9

4:1 Profile ..................................................... 9

4:2 Maturity ............................................... 10
4:3 Size ........................................................ 11
05 Profile of individual
marketers .............................................. 12
5:1 Job titles .............................................. 12

5:2 Target audiences .............................. 13
5:3 Geographic responsibility ............. 14
5:4 Personal responsibilities ............... 16
5:5 Quality of internal relationships . 18
06 Marketing priorities......................... 20

6:1 Priorities .............................................. 21

6:2 Barriers to success .......................... 22
6:3 Support for the sales function ..... 24
07 Budgets in 2014 ................................. 25
03
08 Marketing channels......................... 33
| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014
01 Introduction ............................................ 4
7:1 Size of budget ..................................... 25

7:2 Areas for increase/decrease ........ 27
7:3 Investments in marketing
systems ............................................... 30

8:1 Plans for content creation ............. 33

8:2 Choices of social networks ........... 35
09 Measurement ...................................... 37
9:1 Capabilities to measure

effectively .......................................... 37
9:2 Barriers to measure marketing
ROI ......................................................... 39
10 Summary ............................................... 41
11 To contribute or learn more ....... 44
12 Further Finextra Research
reports ..................................................... 45
02
01
INTRODUCTION
1:1 Finextra Research
04
This report is published by Finextra Research.
Finextra Research is the worlds leading specialist financial technology (fintech)

news and information source. Finextra offers over 100,000 fintech news, features and TV content items to visitors to www.finextra.com.
Founded in 1999, Finextra Research, covers all aspects of financial technology
innovation and operation involving banks, institutions and vendor organisations
within the wholesale and retail banking, payments and cards sectors worldwide.
Finextras unique global community consists of over 30,000 fintech professionals working inside banks and financial institutions, specialist fintech
application and service providers, consulting organisations and mainstream
technology providers. The Finextra community actively participate in posting
their opinions and comments on the evolution of fintech. In addition, they
contribute information and data to Finextra surveys and reports.
For more information:
Visit www.finextra.com, follow @finextra, contact [email protected] or
call +44 (0)20 3100 3670
1:2 Metia Group

This report is sponsored by Metia Group.
Metia Group works with many of the worlds leading fintech vendors, providing multi-discipline marketing and PR programmes. These activities embrace
both traditional and digital marketing channels, to engage influencers and
decision makers inside banks and financial institutions worldwide.
Metia has supported fintech firms for 25 years, ranging from helping dynamic
startups, to serving the needs of established Fortune 500 firms. Metias deep
financial services and fintech specific industry knowledge is complemented by
expertise in the latest content, social and search techniques.
Through its offices in London, Seattle, Austin and Singapore, Metia employs
over 130 marketing professionals with a diverse range of industry sector
and audience specific expertise. In 2013 Metia produced content in over
50languages.
Visit www.metia.com, follow @Metia, contact [email protected] or
call +44 (0)20 3100 3500.
1:3 Steve Ellis

This report was written by Steve Ellis, Founder, Metia Group.
Steve founded Metia Group in 1989. He has advised many of the worlds largest fintech service and solution providers. As a result of the growth of Metia
Group into adjacent technology, telecoms and media sectors, he has also
developed marketing strategy for global telcos, software, hardware, news and
information vendors serving B2B and B2C customers. These projects have covered both the design of audience specific sales and marketing programmes,
and also the optimisation of internal marketing organisations, processes
andinfrastructure.
Visit www.metia.com, follow @steveellis, contact [email protected] or call
+44 (0)20 3100 3500.
Steve Ellis started working in technology and finance at the time of deregulation in the City of London in 1987. During that period he experienced the dramatic impact technology change would make upon the operation of traditional
financial markets. Subsequently, he has advised fintech vendors operating in
all areas of the wholesale banking, retail banking and payments sectors, on
their marketing programmes.
05
02
BACKGROUND
2:1 Objective
06
The objective of this report is to better understand the priorities and concerns of
marketing professionals working in financial technology organisations worldwide.
Particular areas of interest include:

Maturity of the marketing function and the clarity of its role within
theorganisation
Adoption of new marketing channels and tools
Budget prioritisation and investment intentions
The barriers and frustrations that challenge fintech marketers
2:2 Target audience

This report is intended to be a helpful reference tool to marketing professionals working inside fintech vendor organisations. It will help them to benchmark their marketing activities, capabilities and plans against their peers in
theindustry.
It is also intended to offer a useful source for senior managers within fintech
vendors when considering the focus, structure, skills and resourcing of their
organisations marketing function.
2:3 Methodology
Using the Finextra Research community, a 21 question survey was conducted
in early 2014. Community members who work for fintech vendors of various
sizes and areas of specialisation were contacted via email and asked to participate by completing the questionnaire.
51 individuals responded and completed the questionnaire. Respondees were
promised anonymity regarding their individual responses.
In addition to considering the responses to the survey, for comparison and
context we have cross referenced to other surveys examining marketing professionals in other sectors and their use of new channels and technologies.
02
03
CONTEXT
A sleepy corner, undisturbed by new ideas?
07
The evolution of fintech marketing has largely been defined by two primary
factors:
The characteristics of the target audience, the decision makers who influence
and authorise technology purchases inside financial institutions
The nature of the sales process in this marketplace
With a few notable areas of exception, financial services institutions as a

broad group have not been innovative pioneers of new technology. Security,
reliability and continuity have been the overarching characteristics banks
have sought in their technology purchases. Practical considerations and
responsibility for critical service level continuity have limited the appetite for
technology innovation.
Little encouragement to innovate

In a highly regulated marketplace, banks own marketers have also been
cautious in their adoption of new marketing channels and techniques as
methods of engaging their own customer audiences. As a consequence, fintech
marketers have generally not been encouraged to innovate in the methods
used to engage and influence technology purchasing decision makers within
financial institutions.
An obvious example is in the use of social media. Banks themselves initially
struggled to understand how or why they might use social media to engage
their own audiences. In these circumstances it is not surprising that fintech
marketers were conservative in embracing this channel as a suitable route to
engage their prospects inside banks.
Harsher observers might argue that for many years banks were far from a
natural breeding ground of either innovative technologists, or ground breaking
marketers. Today this stereotypical view is finally changing. Banks are now
embracing technology and marketing innovation both as a tool to better
engage and satisfy their own customers, and in order to send a clear signal of
change in terms of their own behaviour: a new Twitter channel will not fix
every customer satisfaction issue but it does send a statement of intent regarding their commitment to listening and engaging customers.
The impact of a complex sales process

Aside from banks and their employees characteristics and behaviour, fintech
marketing is shaped by the rhythm of the sales process and the procurement
hurdles necessary to overcome inside financial institutions.
In this scenario, in order to be effective for the organisation, it is important

that marketing and sales functions are tightly aligned. The extent of any gap
sometimes chasm that can exist between marketing and sales functions
iscritical.
Constraints on achieving modern marketing objectives

The complexity of the sales process has also held back the achievement of
more contemporary marketing goals, such as automated lead tracking, nurturing and attribution. These goals are problematic in complex, extended
sales processes involving large organisations with multiple stakeholders
and decision makers.
If this brief snapshot builds a picture of a sector that has been inherently
conservative and slow to evolve, then it is deliberately so. This context has
strongly influenced how fintech vendors have generally marketed to these
decision makers (notwithstanding the inevitable variations and exceptions
that have occurred).
The purpose of this report is to better understand the degree to which this
picture remains valid today, and the degree to which the target audiences,
andtherefore also the marketing tools and techniques applied to engage
them,have evolved and will continue to do so in the years ahead.
08
The fintech sector is characterised by complex, multi-stage business-tobusiness (B2B) sales processes and high value, long-term investment commitments requiring informed decision making and carefully considered business
cases. Historically, this has skewed marketing activities toward those that
activate or support direct engagement and relationship building within an
extended sales process.
02
04
PARTICIPATING FINTECH
ORGANISATIONS
4:1 Profile
09
Financial application or solution provider
3.9% 2
3.9%
Diversified technology: hardware, software,

communications or telecoms provider
3.9%
5.9%
Business/management consultant
Financial information/market data
Other financial market service provider
System integrator
80.4%
Respondents: 51
Who knew? Niche solution providers dominate a niche sector

Applying any taxonomy or segmentation to the fintech sector is fraught with
difficulty. Participants are mostly complex, mature businesses, comprised of
multiple different product and service offerings. It is also a sector that has
been subject to a significant amount of M&A activity in recent years, as vendors
extend or bolt-on new offerings. As a consequence categorisation needs to be
applied at a high level.
The survey response reflected a bias which was expected. The survey was
completed primarily by marketers inside organisations which are specialist
financial applications and solutions providers. Inevitably this group has the
greatest interest in understanding the subject. The remaining balance of
respondents was spread equally across the other participants in the
fintecharena.
fig 1: TYPE OF ORGANISATION: HOW WOULD YOU BEST DESCRIBE YOUR

PRIMARY BUSINESS FOCUS?
4:2 Maturity
fig 2: MATURITY OF YOUR ORGANISATION: WHICH DESCRIPTION BEST SUITS
YOUR BUSINESS?
Long term industry participant 10 years+
3.9%
Established player 2 years+
11.8%
Startup 0 to 2 years old

10
Respondents: 51
In fintech, age is not a barrier

The vast majority of respondents work in long established businesses. This
confirms expectations around the industry and the maturity of the vendors
serving it.
A quick scan through the names of vendors consistently participating at
key industry conferences (including SIBOS, BAI Retail Delivery) for over a
decade or more, confirms the longevity of fintech organisations, once they
become established.
Where are all the startups?

Less well represented are the new wave of startups emerging daily in the
fintech sector. Globally, fintech investment has more than tripled over the past
three years rising from $928 million in 2008 to $2.97 billion in 2013 (source:
Accenture report The Boom in Global Fintech Investment). In addition to VCs,
an extensive ecosystem of accelerators and mentors has emerged to help fintech
startups grow their businesses. Marketers in startup organisations are not well
represented by the survey. Given their characteristics this is not surprising.
Understandably, bootstrapped startups adopt a zero budget, DIY (do-it-yourself) approach to marketing that relies upon the aptitude and skillsets of the
founders to market and sell the new business and its solution. Todays startups
are inevitably born social. They are comfortable with using social media
channels as cheap and easy routes to gain visibility.
84.3%
This approach works well in creating noise to attract the attention of potential
funders. The potential weakness occurs at the point at which startups receive
first or second round funding, or have achieved critical mass of client revenues. Startups then require the skills and expertise of experienced marketing
professionals to go-to-market at scale.
4:3 Size
fig 3: SIZE OF YOUR ORGANISATION BY ANNUAL REVENUES

11
5.9%
$1bn plus
5.9%
$100m to $1bn
19.6%
$50m to $100m
15.7%
$10m to $50m
17.6%
$1m to $10m
Under $1m
$0
27.5%
7.8%
Respondents: 51
Even distribution of respondents by revenue

The largest single group of respondents by number fall into the typical revenue scale of mid-sized financial solution or application specialists, collectively
38.3% have from $10m to $100m of revenues. A similar number work within
big corporations, collectively 37.2% have $100m or more revenues, of that
19.6% are at over $1bn. The remaining 27.5% are smaller organisations with
under $10m in revenues.
For the purposes of achieving a broad view of the marketplace, the spread of
responses and input achieved from all sizes of organisation is very helpful.
Respondents were of course offered anonymity. However in terms of establishing the credibility of the data gathered by the survey, it is worth noting
that every organisation responding would be recognisable to the majority of
participants in the fintech arena.
02
05
PROFILE OF INDIVIDUAL
MARKETERS
5:1 Job titles
12
5.9%
Marketing Manager
2%2%
Marketing Director/VP
11.8%
35.3%
Other
Sales and Marketing Director
Marketing Executive
13.7%
Founder/Board Director
Managing Director/General Manager
29.4%
Respondents: 51
Seniority brings credibility to views collected

No surprises among the range of job titles identified. The seniority of the titles
reflects well upon the credibility of the data gathered, especially when viewed
alongside the scale of the organisations responding.
It is reassuring that relatively few organisations incorporate responsibility for
marketing with the sales function. This approach can succeed with the right
individuals. However, the overriding priority to close sales opportunities can
focus marketing resource on short term tasks at the expense of longer term
demand generation or brand building activities.
The success of the interplay between sales and marketing functions is a constant theme and sometimes also an area of conflict. It is further explored in
later sections.
fig 4: JOB ROLE: WHICH JOB TITLE IS CLOSEST TO YOUR OWN?
5:2 Target audiences

fig 5: WHICH TYPES OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DO YOU MARKET TO?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Wholesale banking sector:

buy-side institutions
70%
76.5%
80%
90%
100%
23.5%
58.8%
41.2%

other market participants
58.8%
41.2%
Retail banking sector:

corporate services
47.1%
Retail banking sector: small and

medium-sized businesses
35.3%

consumer products
33.3%

high net worth customers
31.4%
Yes
52.9%
64.7%
66.7%
68.6%
No
Respondents: 51
Stretched across sectors and audiences

The fintech marketers that responded focus on a mixed portfolio of products and/or solutions aimed at different market segments and audiences.
There is a clear preponderance toward the wholesale banking sectors among
therespondents.
What are the implications of this mixed portfolio of target sectors and audiences?
Fintech marketers will be required to build and sustain broad industry knowledge of developments in often quite separate segments within the financial
services industry.
How to be an expert on many topics?

The challenge of understanding the issues within diverse segments shouldnt
be under-estimated. The customer audiences, products and services of the
financial institutions change. So do the regulations and the technologies applied. The gap between framing a marketing proposition or campaign around
say a High Frequency Trading (HFT) solution versus a mobile payments app
is significant.
13

sell-side institutions
Recruiting experienced and talented marketers with fintech domain knowledge

is difficult. Senior managers responsible for marketing functions need to plan
their strategies around the training, internal knowledge transfer and retention
of their teams. This is an obvious and longstanding issue within the fintech
niche. It will become increasingly critical as the job market improves generally
and the lure of funded fintech startups increases.
Are you ready for content centric marketing?
Expect content marketing and social engagement to play a greater role in

future marketing activities. In a content-centric marketing landscape, fintech
organisations need to be clear where their subject matter expertise resides.
They need to be precise in describing the dependencies and setting expectations
around capturing and re-purposing that knowledge for use in sustained content marketing outreach and social interactions.
5:3 Geographic responsibility

fig 6: GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS: WHICH BEST DESCRIBES YOUR GEOGRAPHIC
RESPONSIBILITY?
Global
5.9%
A multi-country region
19.6%
A single country
74.5%
Respondents: 51
14
Finding marketers comfortable operating within the jargon of the banking

and technology sectors, and with good experience of modern marketing techniques, has always been a challenge. Knowledge of fintech is neither quickly,
nor easily learned. Current trends in marketing will only make this depth of
knowledge an increasingly important issue. There is a clear risk to the effectiveness of the marketing function.
Stretched across countries and cultures

In addition to multiple audiences, fintech marketers are also required to serve
multiple geographies. Some 74.5% hold a global role, with an additional 19.6%
also having multi-country responsibility (primarily within EMEA or APJ/APAC
focused organisations). Overall some 94.1% serve multiple countries.
Conflicted objectives compromise execution

This broad geographical remit also raises issues around the structure of the
marketing organisation and the accountability of individuals and functions.
There can be an assumption that the large corporations responding have local
subsidiary resources to help in execution. However experience suggests that
even in the largest fintech organisation, the capability to execute can be limited by the availability of local resource, budget, conflicted priorities and the
politics of reporting lines.
In smaller organisations the situation is typically less complex but no less
challenged. A lack of local support and lower budgets place more responsibility
on the individual marketer to create and execute activities.
In this situation it is easy to see the case for the economies of scale offered by
pan-regional fintech events and media platforms for the purposes of regional
marketing outreach. Being able to organise centrally and execute locally is a
significant benefit to time and resource challenged fintech marketers.
Fintech marketers themselves are a cosmopolitan and dispersed group.
Respondents were based in the USA, Germany, France, UK, Netherlands,
Belgium, Greece, Turkey, Ireland, India, Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia.
15
What are the implications of this broad geographical remit? Fintech marketers
are required to build an understanding of the characteristics of banking and
finance in diverse cultures, raising the same issues around audience understanding and subject matter expertise within the marketing function that
were highlighted in question 5b. The sheer breadth and depth of this knowledge
building requirement should not be underestimated by senior managers.
5:4 Personal responsibilities

fig 7: WHAT RESPONSIBILITIES DO YOU HAVE?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Awareness of brand/solution
80%
86.3%
Press relations (PR)
84.3%
90%
100%
13.7%
15.7%
76.5%
23.5%
Brand management
76.5%
23.5%
Market research/customer
research
74.5%
Internal communications
68.6%
Analyst relations (AR)
56.9%
Sponsorship
52.9%
Customer experience
39.2%
Customer loyalty/satisfaction
29.4%
Product management
25.5%
Corporate social
responsibility (CSR)
21.6%
Investor relations
17.6%
Yes
No
Stretched across marketing and beyond

Fintech marketers have responsibility for a very wide range of different activities and tasks.
It is no surprise to see the fintech marketing staples of lead generation, brand
awareness, brand management, PR and AR feature prominently. However to
see a reasonable number of the respondents also responsible for areas such as
market research, internal communications, customer experience and product
management was surprising.
25.5%
31.4%
43.1%
47.1%
60.8%
70.6%
74.5%
78.4%
82.4%
Respondents: 51
16
Lead generation
Clearly it is a challenge to stay up-to-date on the latest innovations, tools and

techniques across so many areas of responsibility.
To some extent the degree to which this might be an issue depends upon the
size of organisation. In the larger companies responding (and based on the
seniority of respondents) one can reasonably make the assumption that marketing teams exist, composed of individuals with specific expertise, each owning different areas of responsibility. Additionally, one can reasonably assume
external suppliers and agencies are available to help support them.
Jack-of-all trades?
17
However given the number of small and mid-sized organisations responding,

it is clear that many individual fintech marketers are expected to cover a very
broad scope of activities.
Marketers will recognise that many of these areas including investor relations, corporate social responsibility, market research and internal communications are specialised topics. If a jack-of-all-trades approach is
taken, there will be obvious compromises associated. Responses to previous questions have already indicated that respondents are stretched across
different audiences and geographies. Now they are being pulled in several
more directions.
Senior managers looking at this spread of responsibilities need to be realistic
whether their marketing function is adequately resourced to lead and drive
in all of these activities. Or is it more effective that they are geared toward
directing and managing specialist third party suppliers or agencies? It is also
important to be realistic in understanding that practical prioritisation choices
are probably being made in the frontline which might prevent the organisation
achieving its business objectives.
A call to better organise the Org. Chart?

Other discrepancies to highlight include that the survey shows 60.8% of
respondents do not have responsibility for customer experience. Some 70.6%
of respondents do not have responsibility for customer loyalty or satisfaction.
This contrasts with other industry sectors, where much discussion is taking
place around the evolution of the Chief Marketing Officer role, into that of a
Chief Experience Officer, with clear and primary responsibility for the customer experience.
It is also worth noting that some 68.6% have responsibility for internal
communications. This is no surprise but never seems to have a completely
satisfactory outcome in practice. Internal comms seldom finds a comfortable
resting place on the corporate organisation chart.
5:5 Quality of internal relationships

fig 8: RATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE MARKETING FUNCTIONS RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER
INTERNAL FUNCTIONS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Senior management/
executive leadership
60%
70%
80%
90%
50.0%
Sales
39.5%
100%
42.1%
7.9%
52.6%
7.9%
2.6%
Product management
31.6%
26.3%
Finance
52.6%
15.8%
10.5%
7.9%
13.2%
71.1% 5.3%
10.5%
Very effective
55.3%
71.1%
Satisfactory
No relationship
7.9%
18.4%
Ineffective
Respondents: 38
My boss is my friend
Fintech marketers are a positive breed. Despite the considerable burden of
their responsibilities, they did not take the opportunity offered to complain
about their bosses. Some 92.1% reported a relationship with senior management that was either Very Effective or Satisfactory.
Similarly, 92.1% reported a relationship with their sales function that was
either Very Effective or Satisfactory; although, the proportion is weighted
towards just being Satisfactory (52.6%), rather than Very Effective (39.5%).
Perhaps surprisingly, given the potential for friction between sales and marketing functions, only 7.9% reported an Ineffective relationship with sales.
Does anyone know where the IT guy hangs out?

Most worrying for senior managers reviewing this data is that 22.1% of fintech
marketers report having either No Relationship (7.9%) or an Ineffective relationship (13.2%) with their IT function. It is hard to understand how any contemporary marketer can be effective without a close relationship with their IT
function to provision, integrate and support the points of integration between
external facing marketing platforms and the organisations core systems.
18
IT
Legal/compliance
50%
Analysts have gathered headlines by forecasting that the Chief Marketing

Officer (CMO) will shortly have a larger technology budget than the Chief
Information Officer (CIO) and now a host of exciting new marketing solutions
offers organisations more effective outreach and engagement with the added
efficiency advantages of process automation.
Later in this report, the same fintech marketers confirm their intention to increase their investments in a variety of marketing systems and infrastructure.
In these circumstances any organisation with a significant gap between its
marketing and IT functions is setting itself up to enjoy painful, prolonged implementation experiences. Senior managers clearly need to address this point.
19
02
06
MARKETING PRIORITIES
6:1 Priorities
20
Retain/grow existing customers
2.4%
Acquire new customers

Both, with equal importance
33.3%
64.3%
Respondents: 51
Mature fintech vendor would like to meet rich budget holders, and lots of them
Nearly two thirds of all responding marketers are focused upon both acquisition and retention (64.3%). One third precisely is tasked exclusively with
acquisition. Just 2.4% are tasked exclusively with the retention and growth
ofexisting customers.
The dual focus of the majority of respondents holds no surprises. Neither does
the fact that acquisition is clearly the biggest priority. Collectively 97.6% have
acquisition as either a single or shared priority.
What does this imply?
Clearly the focus of fintech marketers is massively skewed toward acquisition
of new customer relationships. To some extent this is understandable.
fig 9: MARKETING PRIORITIES IN 2014:

WHAT IS YOUR MAIN MARKETING PRIORITY?
Businesses focusing upon growth invariably prioritise new customer acquisition and marketing is required to lead these efforts. This focus determines
marketers subsequent choices of activities and prioritisation. Inevitably this
de-prioritises the importance of marketing to existing customers, a task
usually left to account based sales teams.
Learning from technology vendors

Mainstream technology companies typically also have more strongly developed
customer advocacy and reference programmes than are found among fintech
vendors. Often these are linked to early adopter programmes, and voice of the
customer or customer satisfaction initiatives.
These programmes are typically tuned to help support the use of customer
referencing within the sales process and to generate and amplify positive
comments and discussion in social platforms. Fintech vendors need to examine
these programmes and understand how they can apply the approaches and
techniques used among their own customer base.
21
This focus contrasts with mainstream technology sectors, where marketers

are increasingly responsible for helping to sustain engagement with customers.
Often this reflects the faster movement toward renewal-based, hosted service
models. In these situations more focus is placed upon marketers responsibility
for the customer experience lifecycle, contribution to the reduction of churn
and growth in account value.
6:2 Barriers to success

fig 10: WHAT ARE THE BIGGEST BARRIERS TO ACHIEVING YOUR MARKETING OBJECTIVES?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Dependency on other in-house

functions to execute
47.4%
Campaigns by competitors
31.6%
26.3%
Lack of in-house participation

in social media
23.7%
2.6%
21.1%
Inadequate agency capability

or expertise
Fundamental quality of the

product or service
15.8%
Definite risk
80%
90%
28.9%
34.2%
15.8%
10.5%
23.7%
7.9%
7.9%
39.5%
36.8%
23.7%
23.7%
52.6%
36.8%
23.7%
36.8%
57.9%
23.7%
Significant threat
100%
28.9%
44.7%
15.8%
21.1% 5.3%
2.6%
15.8%
10.5%
70%
65.8%
Minor concern
No issue at all
Respondents: 38
Are we really all pulling in the same direction?

A wry smile is raised by the discovery that fintech marketers see their colleagues as a greater barrier to achieving their marketing objectives than the
campaigns of their competitors.
Collectively, 63.2% see internal dependencies on other functions as either a
Definite Risk or Significant Threat, compared to just 36.9% who see the campaigns of competitors as either a Definite Risk or Significant Threat.
While lacking confidence in their colleagues, in contrast fintech marketers are
overwhelmingly confident in the capabilities of their products and services.
Collectively some 89.5% have only Minor Concern (23.7%) or No Issue (65.8%)
with the fundamental quality of their offering.
22
Lack of management/executive
commitment
Regulatory constraints which

inhibit marketing
60%
31.6% 5.3%
Size of budget available
Lack of in-house expertise

in digital and web
50%
The inevitable budget question: how much budget is enough? hangs in the
balance. Our interpretation of the response is that a bigger budget is always
welcomed but there is also a maturity in the view that budget is also not the
overriding determinant of success. Budget only sits as joint second in terms
of being a Definite Risk to achieving goals.
Activate social inside the business for external success

Lack of in-house participation in social media is collectively considered a
Definite Risk or Serious Threat for 39.5% of respondents. While a minority
this is a large number and reflects a better understanding among marketers
that success in social media cannot solely be achieved through channels managed by the organisations marketers but also needs activation by other internal
functions and individual colleagues. It would appear the task of education,
encouragement and mentoring on the use of social media is invariably being
added to fintech marketers To Do lists.
In contrast to the previous question (5e), regarding the good quality of internal
relationships with executives, collectively 36.8% see lack of executive commitment as a Definite Risk (26.3%) or a Significant Threat (10.5%). Perhaps there
is a difference between claiming a good relationship, and the ability to actually
depend upon executives for serious investments of time or support.
Are you satisfied with your agency?

Agencies emerge with credit, although there is polarisation between those
happy with their agencies and those dissatisfied. In a sector where expertise is
hard to find, collectively 76.3% consider lack of agency expertise either only a
Minor Concern (23.7%) or No Issue (52.6%). However room for improvement
does exist as 21.1% regard lack of agency expertise as a Definite Risk. For
agencies the implication is that on average one in five fintech organisations
will be reviewing whether its agency is fit for purpose.
Similarly, marketers consider they are well placed for in-house digital and
web expertise. Collectively 73.6% consider lack of in-house digital and web
expertise as either only a Minor Concern (36.8%) or No Issue (36.8%). Our
reflection is that while pure technical skills are easy to secure internally, most
organisations still struggle to establish motivate and retain adequate in-house
creative and / or analytical resources.
23
Anecdotally, many fintech businesses seem to be continuing with the tight

budget lockdowns that helped them through the recession. This could
mean they will fail to market themselves effectively as we head into a positive economic cycle. A contrarian might suggest, perhaps the 31.6% who
regard their lack of budget as a Definite Risk, simply work inside better
managedbusinesses.
6:3 Support for the sales function

fig 11: HOW WILL YOU BE SUPPORTING YOUR SALES FUNCTION?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Creation of sales presentation

materials
80%
90%
100%
94.7% 5.3%
By executing lead generation

campaigns
92.1%
89.5%
Provision of sales readiness tools/

training
68.4%
RFP or bid documentation support/

creation
55.3%
Participate in face-to-face
sales activities
52.6%
Yes
No
Slideboy, can you make my deck look better?

It was a surprise to see the provision of sales presentation materials as the
most frequently occurring sales support activity (94.7%). Not least as the provision of sales readiness tools / training drops to 68.4% of the respondents.
There is a suspicion that the former more specifically described activity is at
the level of helping sales with individual presentations or slide decks. This is
supported by the fact that 55.3% of respondents are also involved in RFP and
bid documentation creation.
From this data it would appear that it is difficult for marketers to police the
line between providing the sales function with tools to improve their effectiveness and productivity, and getting drawn into the legwork of practical
production chores.
Meet the customers and understand the audience

Over half of fintech marketers (52.6%) also participate in face-to-face sales activities. This is positive. Exposure to the sales process is invaluable for marketers. It helps them to understand the challenges faced by their colleagues in
sales as they steer a prospect through the sales process. It also exposes them
to the behaviour of prospects at firsthand to help inform marketing activities
that might better accelerate the sales cycle.
10.5%
31.6%
44.7%
47.4%
Respondents: 38
24
Through lead qualification and

handover into CRM
7.9%
02
07
BUDGETS IN 2014
7:1 Size of budget
25
fig 12: SIZE OF YOUR MARKETING BUDGET
$50m plus
3.9% 2% 2%
$10m $50m
19.6%
21.6%
$1m $10m
$100K $1m
Under $100K
$0
51.0%
Respondents: 51
Size is always relative

As we have seen in previous questions, opinions regarding marketing budgets are mixed. The majority of respondents (51.0%) are responsible for
budgets between $100K and $1m. The spread across these amounts is quite
large. Therefore it is hard to confidently draw conclusions. However given
the spread of sectors, geographies, responsibilities and activities to be covered, it is safe to assume that these amounts will be spread thinly across
manypriorities.
In contrast collectively 23.5% manage with under $100K to spend. This group
must largely be managing through their own practical efforts at creative selfhelp, rather than investing significantly in external agencies or media investments. It would be interesting to investigate the success of these DIY fintech
marketers, and to what extent the evolution of simple-to-use technology and
the availability of free social platforms has assisted them in their efforts in
recent years.
Even among those better endowed with budget 21.6% have budgets of between $1m and $10m available it is possible to believe those amounts will
also be spread thinly across global organisations.
26
7:2 Areas for increase/decrease

fig 13: IN WHICH ACTIVITIES WILL YOUR MARKETING BUDGET INCREASE OR DECREASE?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
80%
90%
100%
2.4%
Content:
creation of original content
69.0%
Website:
build, develop, maintain
28.6%
2.4% 2.4%
38.1%
57.1%
54.8%
Email marketing
(for acquisition)
33.3%
52.4%
Advertising online
50.0%
Natural search: Search

Engine Optimisation (SEO)
50.0%
Social media
(earned participation)
23.8% 4.8%
21.4%
42.9% 7.1%
2.4%
42.9%
7.1%
2.4%
54.8%
47.6%
Press relations (PR)
42.9%
Content:
syndication and publishing
40.5%
Webinars/virtual events
40.5%
Email marketing
(for retention)
45.2%
33.3% 4.8%
33.3%
Social media
(paid campaigns)
33.3%
Paid search:
Pay Per Click (PPC)
2.4%
57.1% 4.8%
45.2%
2.4%
40.5%
2.4%
38.1%
31.0%
Events:attending trade
shows & conferences
26.2%
Increase
28.6%
50.0%
21.4%
11.9% 4.8%
40.5%
23.8%
No change
14.3%
23.8%
57.1%
9.5%
Advertising offline 4.8%
14.3%
21.4%
35.7%
Analyst relations (AR)
11.9%
2.4% 2.4%
42.9%
50.0%
Decrease
Do not use
Respondents: 42
27
Events:
running own customer events
Investor relations
70%
Budgets are bouncing back for fintech marketers

Marketing investments are generally increasing and the use of key digital
channels is prevalent. Overall the weight of movement is toward increases in
marketing investments, rather than decreases. This optimism is driven by both
the upturn in the economic cycle and the newfound vitality of the fintech arena.
Where are fintech marketers increasing their marketing investments?
The reports findings mirror recent experiences and recommendations. In

terms of demand generation typically, content leads, then search and social
follow closely behind. Press relations and analyst relations are both important
at influencing critical moments in the buying cycle. Website and email optimisation are core hygiene requirements to be sustained. Events remain valuable
but need to be selected intelligently to develop high quality relationships.
This snapshot reflects a modern digital landscape in which prospects now
pre-qualify potential suppliers using their own web research to create short
lists. Preferences are determined based upon information downloaded from
independent industry sites, conversations on social networks and the review
of a companys online presence. Analysts and consultants still play a key role
but they too are subject to these influences on their opinions.
If you publish they will come. Or possibly not

Content is clearly the top priority among fintech marketers. Content budgets
were considered in two questions. The first asking about the budget for creating
original content, the second asking about budget for the syndication and
publishing of content. While a small number of our respondents simply did
not use these techniques, none of the respondents were planning to decrease
planned budgets in either of these areas.
Content creation is a well understood priority with 69.0% planning to increase their budgets. The need to invest in content syndication and publishing
is less clear cut for some marketers with only 40.5% increasing their investment in these areas. This reflects the misconception that great content will
simply find its audience. Investments in publishing, seeding and syndication
are essential to maximise the value of investments in content creation. Social,
search and analytics play key roles here.
28
Any preconception that fintech marketers are lagging behind other sectors in
their appetite to use contemporary marketing techniques has to be banished.
That may have once been the case but this report confirms the intention to
increase investments in areas such as content, web, email and search.
In terms of social media the overwhelming majority are actively investing

in earned social media activities. Some 47.6% are increasing budgets, with
42.9% sustaining their current budgets. Just 7.1% have found a reason for abstaining from earned social media participation. By contrast 23.8% do not use
paid social media campaigns at all. This is either an issue of budget constraint
or a lack of understanding of the value of these techniques. Paid social media
campaigns can be used successfully to extend the reach of content and accelerate the growth of communities. It is an area for marketers to reconsider.
PR remains a cornerstone in fintech
Analyst relations, which has a more immediate and direct impact on the sales
pipeline than press relations, sees a similar level of commitment with 78.5%
either sustaining or increasing their investment.
If the death of print advertising was not already obvious through the shrinking
page numbers of magazines aimed at the banker and other banking technology
audiences, this report confirms it. Only 4.8% plan to increase their budget
spend in print advertising. A massive 50% simply do not use print media at all.
Relationship building is still critical, even in a digital age

In stark contrast, the other traditional staple for fintech marketers, attending
trade shows and conferences, sees increased budget from 26.2% of respondents
and unchanged budget from 57.1%. Indeed running your own customer event
will benefit from increased budget among no less than 54.8% of respondents
and an unchanged budget among 33.3%. Remarkably, no-one who runs
customer events is reducing the budget for the activity.
The data gathered reflects the polarisation not between online and offline
channels but between passive and interactive marketing activities. This
means some very old-fashioned marketing activities, notably events and
conferences, are flourishing alongside the latest digital techniques.
The formula and personality of fintech events is also evolving influenced by
inputs from the tech sector such as TED talks, hackathons and the unconference model. Technology itself is also changing the event experience with
realtime interactivity and remote participation possible via social media and
online streaming.
29
Confidence in the use of PR is unshakeable. PR is the only technique used by

100% of our respondents. No less than 97.7% will collectively either sustain
or increase their investment in PR. While the essence of good PR remains
around effectively crafting and communicating key messages to the target
media, competence in modern digital PR practices can only help to strengthen
content and natural search performance.
7:3 Investment in marketing systems

fig 14: WHICH MARKETING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS/TOOLS WILL YOU INVEST IN?
0%
10%
20%
30%
Website optimisation for

mobile devices
50%
60%
70%
80%
38.1%
Social media management system
90%
42.9%
35.7%
Website analytics
33.3%
31.0%
Social media monitoring

system
28.6%
Content Management System

(CMS)
61.9% 4.8%
45.2%
40.5%
31.0%
23.8%
Customer Relationship
Management system (CRM)
21.4%
Email distribution platform

(eDM)
21.4%
Email optimisation for

mobile devices
21.4%
Mobile apps for customers
57.1%
19.0%
71.4% 7.1%
66.7%
57.1%
19.0%
33.3%
11.9%
Increase
26.2%
35.7%
No change
11.9%
21.4%
47.6%
52.4%
No investment
Respondents: 42
Marketers have extensive technology wishlists

Overall it is noticeable that more fintech marketers will be sustaining, rather
than increasing their investments in marketing systems. The implication is
that, therefore, many of these systems are already in situ.
The number of respondents increasing their investments is still a strong indicator of the focus on the use of systems to underpin aspects of marketing.
The number of systems apparently already in situ was surprising. The worry
is that perhaps in truth many of these investments remain a work in progress.
Typically, the promise of new, shortly to arrive, marketing systems is invariably
loudly heralded. Whereas, the unfulfilled promise of stalled or failed
30
28.6%
100%
19.0%
33.3%
Marketing automation/
Personalised web marketing
Mobile apps for sales
40%
technology investments is quietly forgotten. In anecdotal conversation fintech

(and tech) marketers often reference the expected arrival of new marketing
systems and tools but mitigate that comment with the proviso that it wont be
a factor in the short term.
Mobility is a priority for everyone
The need to optimise email for consumption on mobile devices is less widely
accepted with just 21.4% increasing budget in this area.
In contrast to websites, provision of mobile apps for either customers or
the sales team is bottom of the list. Sustaining a customer facing app with
refreshed content and maintaining two or more native code bases is a substantial commitment. Similarly, competing for mindshare with mainstream
consumer, news and lifestyle apps is hugely competitive and can easily marginalise the efforts of even the best funded fintech vendors.
Have CRM investments delivered ROI?

The core building blocks of modern marketing infrastructure look to be well
established. CRM, CMS and eDM platforms enjoy either increased or sustained
budgets of 92.8% for CRM, 80.9% for CMS and 88.1% for eDM platforms. Given
previous and new investments, there must be frustration that the ability to
track and measure marketing ROI is still limited. This topic is explored in
section nine.
Social is clearly an area of focused investment. Two thirds of marketers
(69.0%) already use social media management systems, with 35.7% looking to
increase their spending in this area this year. Almost exactly the same number
(69.1%) use social media monitoring systems, with some 28.6% increasing
their investment this year.
While some areas of marketing systems (CRM, CMS and eDM are good examples) have already seen consolidation around a core set of vendors and product
offerings, the arena of social media management and monitoring remains
fragmented with a large number of players hoping to become established. In
these changing circumstances marketers need to consider their choices of new
systems and tools carefully.
31
The inexorable trend toward greater mobile internet consumption has pushed
website optimisation for mobile and touch devices into the top priority for
investment. Evidence of this demand is manifest in the number of RFPs for
responsive HTML5 websites. Mobile optimisation is also a reasonably discrete
achievable project for marketers to initiate without tight dependency on other
systems for sucess.
Better analysis enables better decision-making

Increased investment in website analytics (among 33.3% of respondents) is to
be applauded. Improved focus upon the discipline of analytics is essential to
demonstrate the ROI from marketing.
A consistent focus upon better understanding site usage, traffic flows and the
customers online journey is a sign of maturity, aiding both website optimisation and digital marketing strategy. A failure to invest in analytics, or to
then consistently turn that data into insight, prevents the multitude of small
incremental improvements to websites and / or marketing processes that will
improve performance.
32
02
08
MARKETING CHANNELS
8:1 Plans for content creation
33
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2.4%
To help establish thought

leadership
76.2%
For use in demand generation &

lead capture
16.7% 4.8%
2.4% 2.4%
31.0%
2.4% 2.4%
54.8%
64.3%
To drive search engine

optimisation
40.5%
To support conversations on
social media
28.6%
Essential
52.4%
Important
Not important
11.9% 7.1%
Do not use
Respondents: 42
Are you yet another author? Or are you an authority?

It has already been confirmed that content is critical to the fintech marketing
mix. Of the content assets created their primary functions are to build credible
thought leadership (Essential or Important for 92.9% collectively) and for use
in demand generation and lead capture campaigns (Essential or Important for
95.3% collectively).
Recognition of the value of content to assist natural search engine optimisation
(SEO) lags behind, as does its use to fuel conversation on social platforms. As
search engines continue to tune their algorithmic models toward prioritising
content not links, and also embracing social references within search results,
this focus will need to change.
SEO has been something of a Cinderella discipline among fintech marketers.
Skewed by pre-conceptions around the relevance of pay per click (PPC), SEO
struggled to prove its value to the B2B purchase cycle. Now with greater
fig 15: WHAT MOTIVATES YOUR INVESTMENT IN CREATING ORIGINAL CONTENT ASSETS?
understanding of the need to influence purchasers during their research and

qualification of solutions, SEO is an area for increased focus.
Equipping salespeople to engage executives

While using content to build thought leadership and amplifying it through
digital and PR channels are clear priorities, content assets are also being used
to support a more informed sales dialogue.
All of these responses demonstrate the escalating importance of content.

In these circumstances, fintech marketers need to have clear strategies for
sustaining the creation, publishing and syndication of their content assets
through multiple channels.
34
With opportunities to engage senior decision makers diminishing as they retreat

behind online research and their own diary limitations, the sales function
needs a supply of topical and interesting content in order to open up and sustain
a relevant dialogue. Content assets created by the marketing function should
be of direct value to field sales when packaged and shared in suitable formats.
8:2 Choice of social networks

fig 16: WHICH SOCIAL NETWORKS WILL YOU INVEST IN?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
LinkedIn
80%
90%
78.6%
Twitter
21.4%
57.1%
33.3%
50.0%
YouTube
42.9%
Tech industry
community sites
40.5%
Google Plus
33.3%
16.7%
40.5%
16.7%
40.5%
26.2%
42.9%
2.4%
47.6%
Facebook 4.8%
9.5%
19.0%
31.0%
45.2%
Pinterest
16.7%
83.3%
Tumblr
16.7%
83.3%
Increase investment
No change
Decrease investment
No presence
Respondents: 38
Marketers are very LinkedIn but show little Pinterest

Previously (in question 7.b) it was identified that 90.5% of respondents planned
to either increase or sustain their investments in earned social media. Some
73.8% planned to do likewise in their paid social media campaigns. It is valuable to learn which social platforms these investments will be directed towards.
LinkedIn is the pervasive social network among fintech vendors. It is the only
social network where all responding companies have a presence. Although it
is not clear if that presence is free or paid. Some 78.6% are increasing their
investment in LinkedIn. Whether this increase is through investment of time
or budget is also unclear.
A significantly lower figure, some 57.1%, are increasing their investment in
Twitter. Perhaps more remarkably, 9.5% of companies have yet to create a
Twitter presence managed by marketing team.
35
Fintech specialist
community sites
100%
Typically, Twitter scores well for engagement, interaction and community

building but not traffic. Investment of either bandwidth or budget in any of
the various social platforms needs to be informed by the value of the respective platforms to support strategic objectives.
Fintech industry sites provide immediate access to audiences
For B2B organisations, YouTube is primarily a platform for hosting video and
animated content offering improved search benefits and simpler often free
hosting. Decisions around the appropriateness of making investments on
YouTube hinge on the value of its search characteristics and the format and
volume of content assets created by the fintech organisation.
Facebook receives far less attention

The responses around Facebook are surprising. No less than 45.2% have No
Presence on Facebook. Clearly Facebook is unlikely to be the optimum channel
for directly engaging senior fintech decision makers. However Facebook
typically drives more traffic than Twitter to vendors corporate websites.
Facebook is also a priority for current and future employee engagement.
Fintech marketers should reconsider their organisations Facebook presence.
Although natural SEO features elsewhere as a growing priority for our marketers, it would appear that investment of resource in Google+ does not form
a significant part of that plan. Despite the fact that Google+ performs well in
natural SEO, some 31.0% have yet to do anything with Google+. Again, this
might be worthy of reconsideration.
Unsurprisingly, Pinterest and Tumblr are very much marginalised as social
networks by our fintech marketers only 16.7% of respondents use either of
them in any shape or form.
36
Specialist fintech community sites are also seeing increased investment from
some 50% of all respondents, with 83.3% in total having a presence on these
platforms. The collective group of fintech community sites includes community
platforms such as Finextra.com and TabbForum.com. Their value is found
in the immediate exposure to the target audience, often globally. In contrast,
publishing content through owned platforms invariably requires additional
investment of resource or budget in traffic generation.
02
09
MEASUREMENT
9:1 Capabilities to measure effectively
37
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Actively measure visitor numbers to our website
90%
100%
92.1% 7.9%
Are able to capture email addresses from

download requests
84.2%
Actively measure visitor numbers to our social

media sites
57.9%
Are able to automatically track qualified leads

into our CRM system to purchase
47.4%
15.8%
42.1%
52.6%
Actively measure levels of engagement and

interaction on all channels
26.3%
73.7%
Are able to identify and track individual visitors

to our website through personalisation
26.3%
73.7%
Yes
No
Respondents: 38
Marketers like to measure but not to analyse

The basic hygiene factors of measuring visitor numbers to websites and
capturing email addresses from downloads are covered by 92.1% and 84.2%
of respondents. This success represents the lowest common denominator
inmeasurement.
Extraordinarily just 57.9% measure visitor numbers to social media sites.
This really is inexcusable. At its least sophisticated metrics from multiple
social platforms are easily captured, aggregated and reported within well
designed Excel based spreadsheets. The task is more time consuming than it
should be, but it is not difficult.
fig 17: WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CAPABILITIES APPLY TO YOUR ORGANISATION
With the marketing technology sector pre-occupied by the notion of realtime

dashboards looking into large data sets, the use of humble spreadsheets
provides a practical route to start a culture of consistent measurement within
an organisation.
Equally inexcusable is that only 26.3% of respondents actively measure levels
of engagement and interaction across all their channels. Again, this reflects a
failure to create a culture of measurement. Without this type of insight into
the cause and effect of investments, strategies and tactics, it is hard to understand how marketing decisions are taken.
38
More excusable are the difficulties caused by a complex sales process, which
moves frequently between online and offline interaction, and need to be
captured from various disparate sources, processes and systems. As a consequence, some 52.6% are unable to automatically track qualified leads into
their CRM and then through to purchase. Potentially this also points to
weaknesses in the effectiveness of lead nurturing in new and existing customer accounts.
Some 73.7% are unable to identify and track individual visitors to websites
through personalisation. In an era demanding personalisation of the visitor
experience and with big data opportunities lurking close behind, this weakness needs to be re-considered and addressed.
At a broader level senior managers need to consider whether the core skills of
their marketing functions are fit for purpose in a modern marketing environment. It is obvious that senior managers need to plan how to hire or engage
marketers or specialists with strong analytical capabilities. Typically these attributes are not the natural strengths of traditional marketers. They may seek
to strengthen their technical data analytics and measurement capabilities via
either in-house or agency resources.
Attribution remains a distant goal
9:2 Barriers to measure marketing ROI

fig 18: WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO MEASURING MARKETING ROI?
0%
10%
15.8%
Offline activities in programs

cannot be tracked
15.8%
Digital activities in programs

measured poorly
15.8%
Lack of strategic design to

sales processes
30%
10.5%
Lack of strategic design to

marketing processes
10.5%
Stops any ROI
50%
60%
70%
42.1%
34.2%
Manage, but
not easily
13.2%
18.4%
31.6%
60.5%
100%
15.8%
36.8%
26.3%
Causes significant
difficulty
90%
36.8%
28.9%
18.4%
80%
26.3%
34.2%
13.2%
Complex multi-stage sales

cycle with many inputs
40%
28.9%
21.1%
7.9%
36.8%
Have this
covered
Respondents: 38
Does sharing the credit with marketing reduce my sales commission?

Overall the complex, fragmented nature of fintech sales cycles are cited as the
biggest barriers to measuring marketing ROI.
Perhaps unsurprisingly the sales force receives the most blame for the failure
to measure marketing ROI, with some 57.9% identifying the salesforces
minimal input to lead attribution as as either, Stopping any ROI Measurement
(15.5%) or Causing Significant Difficulty (42.1%).
Challenges of complex sales cycles

Not all the blame is pinned on the sales force though. Responses to other
questions highlight there is a more balanced consideration around the bigger
problems of measuring marketing ROI in complex multi-stage sales cycles
that switch between online and offline dialogue.
In fact, some 70.1% call out complex multi-stage sales cycles as either Stopping
any ROI Measurement (10.5%) or Causing Significant Difficulty (60.5%).
Despite this failure to measure marketing ROI, there is a reasonable level of
confidence in the design of both the underlying sales and marketing processes.
39
Sales force input to lead

attribution is minimal
20%
Collectively, 71.0% are defensively minded about the design of their marketing
processes, with 36.8% believing they Have This Covered and 34.2% believing
they Can Manage but not Easily. At 60.5% a slightly smaller number are defensive regarding the strategic design of sales processes, with 28.9% believing
they Have This Covered and 31.6% believing they Can Manage but not Easily.
If fintech marketers believe their processes are not at fault, this implies the
failure is the inability to consistently adhere to existing processes.
40
02
10
SUMMARY
But how do we get all of this done?
41
Fintech marketers are busy. They are spread widely across industry sectors,
geographies and responsibilities. This has a number of implications:
There are issues of recruiting, training and retaining industry and audience
specific expertise within the marketing function
There also needs to be practical and realistic consideration of what activities
can be successfully executed within these constraints
Fintech marketers need strategies to execute effectively with scarce resources

of time and budget. Marketing programmes need to be operationalised for
sustainability.
Organise for content, social and search

The new wave of marketing imperatives identified by this report content,
social and search are relentless in their consumption of both bandwidth and
creativity. To operate these programmes, marketers must design and build
sustainable production methods using transparent processes, core systems
and platforms. Third party suppliers and specialist agencies with relevant
experiences may be part of creating such a solution.
To succeed in this type of environment marketers must subjugate their love of
audiences and creative ideas in favour of a more clinical assessment of processes, channels and capacity.
Senior managers need to consider the practical prioritisation of resources
against business goals. In the long term they must evaluate the shape and
skills of their in-house marketing function. To be fit for purpose, the future
marketing function needs to continue to build its technical, analytical and
content capabilities.
Who said content was new anyway?

If content, social and search are important new elements of the fintech marketing mix proven marketing methods such as PR and AR have not been
discarded. Indeed most fintech marketers would rankle at the notion of content
being anything new to B2B marketing practitioners at all.
Fintech marketers have added a suite of new techniques while also retaining existing effective methods. The polarisation that exists between old and
new is not between online and offline but between passive and interactive.
Hence conferences and events continue to increase budget investment, while
printdwindles.
Mobility is a juggernaut that cannot be avoided. Websites and email need to

be optimised for mobile consumption and touch devices. Mobility also requires marketers to more carefully consider the context in which their content is consumed.
If fintech marketers were historically adrift of their marketing peers in other
sectors, in terms of innovation or their willingness to experiment, that situation
is not the case today. Differences in the adoption and use of different techniques, tools and channels do exist, but these differences are explained by the
audiences characteristics and the sales process involved.
However it is nonetheless still appropriate for fintech marketers to look at
other sectors and to see what can be borrowed from their techniques and
programmes. An obvious example is the success of mainstream technology
vendors in building both customer reference and early adopter programmes
into the formal product roadmap and customer lifecycle. Fintech marketers
still have techniques to learn in certain areas.
Successful collaboration requires both people and systems to co-operate

Success will be defined by the degree to which people, processes and systems
can be integrated. In this environment, addressing gaps in organisational
responsibilities, conflicting objectives or cultural indifference, are as critical
to success as the interoperability between new marketing systems and core
enterprise infrastructure.
According to respondents, fintech vendors will be investing considerably more
in marketing, tools and systems but remain constrained in their ability to
measure marketing ROI, or even to simply attribute the source of leads into
the CRM. Technology alone will not fix this.
Optimising for mobile is critical
42
The gap between marketing and sales is not a new concern but the risks associated with it remain considerable and will continue to undermine any efforts
to capture the ROI from marketing investments.
The gap between marketing and IT is a significant concern. The benefit of
planned investments in marketing technology and systems cannot be realised
without a strong relationship between marketing and IT. Successful selection
and implementation experiences depend upon an effective collaboration.
Significant return on investment for the business demands integration between
marketing tools and core sales and revenue systems. This can only be
achieved through cooperation between IT and the marketing function.
43
02
11
TO CONTRIBUTE OR LEARN MORE

Visit www.finextra.com, follow @finextra, contact [email protected] or
call +44 (0)20 3100 3670
If you wish to contribute your own views or feedback publicly, the author will
publish a number of posts highlighting the key issues identified by this report
in the community blogs at www.finextra.com.
The sponsor of this report, Metia Group, has also produced a follow on presentation for senior fintech marketers to help them determine the capability of
their marketing operations, and to identify and prioritise key areas for improvement. If you wish to learn more, contact the author.
Visit www.metia.com, follow @steveellis, contact [email protected] or call
+44 (0)20 3100 3500.
44
This report is scheduled to be repeated in 2015. If you have feedback or ideas

to improve it, please contact either the author and / or Finextra Research.
02
12
FURTHER FINEXTRA RESEARCH
REPORTS
If you wish to contribute to these industry surveys simply join the

Finextracommunity.
If you wish to suggest topics or themes of interest, please contact
FinextraResearch.
45
Finextra publishes a series of reports on many subjects of interest to financial

technology professionals, information is available at www.finextra.com.

Finextra Fintech Marketing Report 2014 110914

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Finextra Fintech Marketing Report 2014 110914

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Finextra Fintech Marketing Report 2014 110914

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A FINEXTRA RESEARCH SURVEY

SPONSORED BY METIA GROUP

Finextra Research Ltd

All rights reserved.

1:1 Finextra Research ............................... 4

2:1 Objective ................................................ 6

4:1 Profile ..................................................... 9

5:1 Job titles .............................................. 12

6:1 Priorities .............................................. 21

07 Budgets in 2014 ................................. 25

| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014

7:1 Size of budget ..................................... 25

8:1 Plans for content creation ............. 33

9:1 Capabilities to measure

1:1 Finextra Research

This report is published by Finextra Research.

| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014

Finextra Research is the worlds leading specialist financial technology (fintech)

1:2 Metia Group

1:3 Steve Ellis

| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014

| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014

Particular areas of interest include:

2:2 Target audience

A sleepy corner, undisturbed by new ideas?

| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014

With a few notable areas of exception, financial services institutions as a

Little encouragement to innovate

The impact of a complex sales process

In this scenario, in order to be effective for the organisation, it is important

Constraints on achieving modern marketing objectives

Financial application or solution provider

Diversified technology: hardware, software,

Who knew? Niche solution providers dominate a niche sector

| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014

fig 1: TYPE OF ORGANISATION: HOW WOULD YOU BEST DESCRIBE YOUR

Established player 2 years+

Startup 0 to 2 years old

In fintech, age is not a barrier

Where are all the startups?

| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014

fig 3: SIZE OF YOUR ORGANISATION BY ANNUAL REVENUES

Even distribution of respondents by revenue

5:1 Job titles

Seniority brings credibility to views collected

| FINTECH MARKETING REPORT 2014

fig 4: JOB ROLE: WHICH JOB TITLE IS CLOSEST TO YOUR OWN?

5:2 Target audiences

Wholesale banking sector:

Wholesale banking sector:

Retail banking sector:

Retail banking sector: small and

Retail banking sector:

Retail banking sector:

Stretched across sectors and audiences

How to be an expert on many topics?

Wholesale banking sector:

Recruiting experienced and talented marketers with fintech domain knowledge

Are you ready for content centric marketing?

Expect content marketing and social engagement to play a greater role in