Effectiveness of Employee Welfare in Maruti Suzuki in Varanasi Region
Effectiveness of Employee Welfare in Maruti Suzuki in Varanasi Region
Effectiveness of Employee Welfare in Maruti Suzuki in Varanasi Region
ABSTRACT
Welfare of employee and his family members is an effective advertising and also a method of buying the gratitude and
loyalty of employees. Employee welfare is a comprehensive term including various services, benefits and facilities offered by the
employer. The basic purpose of labour welfare is to enrich the life of employees and keep them happy and contented.
Welfare facilities enable workers to have a richer and more satisfying life. It raises the standard of living of workers by
indirectly reducing the burden on their pocket. Welfare means improving, faring or doing well. It is a comprehensive term, and
refers to the physical, mental, moral and emotional well-being of an individual. Further, the term welfare is a relative concept,
relative in time and space. It therefore, varies from time to time, region to region and from country to country. Labour welfare is
an important aspect in every organization with some added incentives which enable the workers to lead a decent life.
INTRODUCTION
The term labour welfare or employee welfare
may be defined to include the voluntary efforts of the
employers to establish within the existing industrial
system, working and sometimes living and cultural
conditions of the employees beyond that which is
required by law, the custom of the industry and the
conditions of the market. . The term should be used
broadly to include all measures which promote the
physical, psychological, and general wellbeing of the
workers.
All measures and activities undertaken by the
government, employers and association of workers
for improvement of standard of living of workers and
promotion of their economic and social well being
are called labour welfare. Thus it may be defined as
any work for improving the health, safety, and
general well being and work efficiency of the
workers which improve their health and bring high
morale.
Welfare work may be classified into two categories,
viz.
a) Statutory Welfare Work
b) Voluntary Welfare work
The first variety of work has to taken up by the
industry as per the provisions of various labor
enactments. Such provisions may relate to working
conditions, hours of work, industrial safety and
various other facilities to be provided to the worker to
make his work smooth and enjoyable. For example,
the Factories Act, 1948 provides for several welfare
activities such as provision of drinking water,
cleanliness, sanitation, canteens, crches, medical and
education facilities, first aid appliances, recreational
facilities, amusement, games and sports, housing
accommodation, etc.
Voluntary welfare work is done by employers
without any compulsion of any law. It includes such
activities conductive to the welfare of the workers
150
Singh Sweta
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research type- It is of Descriptive type
Sampling technique- Random Sampling
Method of Data Collection: a) through the
interviews:
b) by questionnaires:
Research Technique- The technique used for
analyzing the collected samples is done by the
method of percentage analysis.
Sampling Unit- Maruti Suzuki AGR, Varanasi.
Data analysis tools- Bar graphs.
Population size- 200
Sampling Size- 25
Location- Varanasi.
DATA INTERPRETATIONS
The total numbers of samples are 25 from which
the findings on different aspects of employee welfare
activities are as following1. Working years of the employees.
88% of employees are working for 0-5 years in
Maruti Suzuki, Varanasi.
8% of them are working for 5-10 years and
4% of them are working for 10-15 years.
2. Satisfaction with working environment
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
2(8%)
18(72%)
2(8%)
1(4%)
2(8%)
In per cent
80
60
40
In per cent
20
0
Highly Satisfied
3.
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
No. of facilities
No. of respondents
2-5
5-8
8 and above
14(56%)
7(28%)
4(16%)
151
Singh Sweta
2-5 facility
5-8 facility
8 & above
In per cent
4.
Response
No. of responses
YES
15(60%)
NO
9(36%)
NOT KNOWN
1(4%)
In per cent
80
60
40
In per cent
20
0
Yes
5.
No
Not known
Responses
No. of responses
YES
NO
NOT KNOWN
22(88%)
2(8%)
1(4%)
152
Singh Sweta
6.
YES(in percent)
NO (%)
92
No. of responses
In per cent
100
In per cent
0
Yes
7.
No
Level of
Satisfaction
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
11
(44%)
7
(28%)
7
(28%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
No. of responses
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
Level of
Satisfaction
No. of responses
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
6(24%)
15(60%)
Averagely
satisfied
4(16%)
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
0(0%)
0(0%)
9.
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely atisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
8(32%)
14(56%)
3(12%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
153
Singh Sweta
In per cent
60
40
20
In per cent
0
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
0(0%)
12(48%)
6(24%)
7(28%)
0(0%)
In per cent
0
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
3(12%)
13(52%)
4(16%)
4(16%)
1(4%)
In per cent
0
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
YES
NO
20(80%)
5(20%)
154
Singh Sweta
In per cent
100
In per cent
0
Yes
No
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
5(20%)
15(60%)
4(16%)
1(4%)
0(0%)
Chart 12: Represent Satisfaction with Rest Room & Lunch Facility
In per cent
80
60
40
20
0
In per cent
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
YES
NO
17(68%)
8(32%)
In per cent
100
50
In per cent
0
Yes
No
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly dissatisfied
6(24%)
12(48%)
4(16%)
3(12%)
0(0%)
155
Singh Sweta
In per cent
60
40
20
0
In per cent
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
YES
NO
17(68%)
8(32%)
50
In per cent
0
Yes
No
Complete
Half
Limited
No. of responses
6(24%)
2(8%)
17(68%)
In per cent
100
50
In per cent
0
Complete
Half
Limited
1-2 weeks
2-3 weeks
20(80%)
3(12%)
2(8%)
156
Singh Sweta
In per cent
100
50
In per cent
0
1-2 week
2-3 week
3 & more
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
3(12%)
14(56%)
3(12%)
3(12%)
2(8%)
In per cent
60
40
20
0
In per cent
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
Full Reimbursement
Half Reimbursement
No Reimbursement
Not Applicable
4(16%)
12(48%)
5(20%)
4(16%)
20
0
Full reimbursement Half reimbursement No reimbursement
Not applicable
Yes
No
No Respond
22(88%)
2(8%)
1(4%)
157
Singh Sweta
In per cent
0
Yes
No
No respond
21. Company take safety measures for employees and also for night workers
Table 21: Represents Interpretation of Q22
Response
No. of responses
Yes
No
No Respond
19(76%)
5(20%)
1(4%)
In per cent
20
0
Yes
No
No respond
Yearly
Half Yearly
Quarterly
Monthly
Occasionally
No. of responses
6(24%)
3(12%)
0(0%)
5(20%)
10(40%)
20
10
0
Yearly
Half yearly
Quarterly
Monthly
Occasionally
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
6(24%)
15(60%)
3 (12%)
1(4%)
0(0%)
158
Singh Sweta
In per cent
20
10
0
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
4(16%)
17(68%)
3(12%)
1(4%)
0(0%)
20
0
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
No. of responses
3(12%)
19(76%)
3(12%)
0(0%)
0(0%)
20
0
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
159
Singh Sweta
Highly Agree
Agree
Do Not Agree
No Respond
16(64%)
6(24%)
2(8%)
1(4%)
In per cent
20
0
Highly agree
Agree
Do not agree
No respond
Highly
Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagely Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
No Respond
5(20%)
14(56%)
2(8%)
2(8%)
0(0%)
2(8%)
In per cent
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Averagey
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
No improvement
2(8%)
No respond
1(4%)
In per cent
20
0
No improvement
At time interval
Early action
No respond
160
Singh Sweta
CONCLUSION
The study was conducted to find out the
company's welfare policies. The important factors
which contribute to these policies are: medical
facilities, clean and good work place, trainings,
bottom off counseling, safety, allowances and etc.
Majority of employees are happy and doing their job
satisfactorily and some of them are dissatisfied with
the welfare works of the Organization. So, in todays
informative world where information is readily
available to general public welfare has been an
important part of any organization to be successful.
Organization in present world cannot be successful
without taking into account the welfare of their
employees as employees are on the more valuable
asset for the Organization.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
2.
3.
www.google.com
www.marutisuzuki.com
www.msil.com
http://delhi.gov.in/wps/wcm/connect/lib_dlwb/DLWB/Ho
me/
Delhi welfare board
REFERENCE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
161