The Catalyst Model

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

The Catalyst Model

Resource Consultation &


Collaboration in Gifted Education
Presentation by: NaTasha Pennywell and Allison Kerley
Open this Presentation: bit.ly/catalystmodel

Background

Mary L. Slade,
Ph.D.

Developed by Mary L. Slade

Consultant base approach to gifted education

Based on Blooms Hierarchy, the *Pinnacle Model (Seligman), and


the idea of differentiation

*Link to information about the


Pinnacle Model (pgs 39-40)

How it Looks in the Classroom


Special Populations of Gifted Learners

Low populated schools in Rural areas

The Basic Structure of the Model

Gifted teacher plans and directs differentiated learning


activities for pull-out sessions that complement the
regular education curriculum

Gifted education specialist and classroom teacher


share responsibility for student learning

Student Grouping:

homogenous
cluster-grouping
inter/intraclass grouping
7 - 10 gifted students in one or more classrooms

Collaboration & Consultation Components


Co-Plan

Follow-Up

Co-Teach

These processes involve the gifted education specialists, the classroom teacher, and any support
personnel working cooperatively to provide differentiated education to gifted learners.

10 Non-negotiable Rules:

Flexible pacing

Flexible grouping, including pull-out

Regularly scheduled planning time (short/long


term)

Voluntary participation in problem-solving

Staff development related to model


implementation and curriculum differentiation

Continuation of support for direct service delivery


for gifted learners with gifted education expertise

Administrative support through advocacy,


validation, and maintenance

Documentation of consultation activities

Low ratio of gifted education specialists to


number of colleagues involved in collaborative
efforts (approx 1 - 15)

Participation of gifted education specialist who


possesses expertise in the field

Pros

Cons

How does this help meet the needs of gifted students?

Cost effective

Less elitist

Spill-over effects

Gifted and general education are related,


connected and integrated.

High achieving students receive more


challenging tasks within the classroom.

Research shows students receive three times


the amount of services compared to pull-out,
once a week program.

What is challenging about implementing this


model?

Traveling from school to school may result in


ineffective consultants

Whole-school buy-in is needed

10 non-negotiables

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Gifted Students are gifted all the time, not just 90 minutes a week.

Evidence of this model being used:

All elementary schools in Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools implement this model

Classroom and gifted teachers plan and work together to increase daily instruction for students.

Gifted teacher helps classroom teacher differentiate the basic curriculum by providing more incomplex and/or accelerated activities for students working at a higher level

No set schedule: Gifted teachers may push-in, pull-out, or provide resources to classroom teacher

See more at: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools TD Catalyst Program

Discussion Questions
After taking a closer look at the information in the presentation, discuss the following with
teachers in your grade level, then leave a response on The Catalyst Model Linoit Board (include
your grade level in your answer):
1.

Explain the Catalyst Model in your own words. (yellow sticky note)

2.

Check out the Pros and Cons (slide 5 & 6) for this model. What is the best and
worst thing about this model? Why? (green sticky note)

3.

Take a closer look at how this model is used at Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools


(slide 7). Do you think this TAG model would be good for your grade level at
Shakerag? Explain why or why not. (blue sticky note)

4.

What are you still wondering about the Catalyst Model? (pink sticky note)

You might also like