Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 299 views

    Jar Test

    Uploaded by

    aoi_chiep
    The document reports on the results of three parameter studies to determine the optimum conditions for water treatment. Set 1 examines coagulant dosage, finding the lowest turbidity with 1 ml. Set 2 looks at flocculant dosage, with the lowest turbidity at 2.5 ml. Set 3 analyzes pH, showing the lowest turbidity at pH 7. Graphs support the findings that 1 ml coagulant, 2 ml flocculant, and pH 7 achieved the highest removal efficiency compared to untreated water. In conclusion, the optimum conditions determined from the jar tests followed theoretical expectations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Jar Test

    Uploaded by

    aoi_chiep
    299 views6 pages
    The document reports on the results of three parameter studies to determine the optimum conditions for water treatment. Set 1 examines coagulant dosage, finding the lowest turbidity with 1 ml. Set 2 looks at flocculant dosage, with the lowest turbidity at 2.5 ml. Set 3 analyzes pH, showing the lowest turbidity at pH 7. Graphs support the findings that 1 ml coagulant, 2 ml flocculant, and pH 7 achieved the highest removal efficiency compared to untreated water. In conclusion, the optimum conditions determined from the jar tests followed theoretical expectations.

    Original Description:

    Jar Test

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document reports on the results of three parameter studies to determine the optimum conditions for water treatment. Set 1 examines coagulant dosage, finding the lowest turbidity with 1 ml. Set 2 looks at flocculant dosage, with the lowest turbidity at 2.5 ml. Set 3 analyzes pH, showing the lowest turbidity at pH 7. Graphs support the findings that 1 ml coagulant, 2 ml flocculant, and pH 7 achieved the highest removal efficiency compared to untreated water. In conclusion, the optimum conditions determined from the jar tests followed theoretical expectations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    299 views6 pages

    Jar Test

    Uploaded by

    aoi_chiep
    The document reports on the results of three parameter studies to determine the optimum conditions for water treatment. Set 1 examines coagulant dosage, finding the lowest turbidity with 1 ml. Set 2 looks at flocculant dosage, with the lowest turbidity at 2.5 ml. Set 3 analyzes pH, showing the lowest turbidity at pH 7. Graphs support the findings that 1 ml coagulant, 2 ml flocculant, and pH 7 achieved the highest removal efficiency compared to untreated water. In conclusion, the optimum conditions determined from the jar tests followed theoretical expectations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    SET 1

    Parameter Study: Optimum Coagulant dosage


    JAR NUMBER
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    CONTROL
    1.
    Coagulant dosage(ml)
    0.5 1.0 5 2.0 2.5
    0.0
    pH
    5
    5
    5
    5
    5
    5
    Flocculant Dosage ( ml)
    1
    1
    1
    1
    1
    0
    3.3 2.8 1 9.6 8.3
    Turbidity ( NTU)
    8
    8
    2
    9
    8
    8.55

    SET 2
    Parmeter Study: Optimum Flocculations Optimum dosage
    CONTRO
    JAR NUMBER
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    L
    Coagulant dosage(ml)
    1
    1
    1
    1
    1
    1
    pH
    5
    5
    5
    5
    5
    5
    Flocculant Dosage ( ml)
    0.5
    1
    1.5
    2
    2.5
    0
    30. 55. 44. 29. 47.
    Turbidity ( NTU)
    4
    4
    5
    5
    5
    335

    SET 3
    Parameter Study: Optimum pH
    JAR NUMBER
    1
    2
    3
    4
    Coagulant dosage(ml)
    1
    1
    1
    1
    pH
    6
    7
    8
    9
    Flocculant Dosage ( ml)
    2
    2
    2
    2
    23.
    11.
    30. 3
    Turbidity ( NTU)
    5
    5
    7
    3

    5
    1
    10
    2
    23
    6

    CONTROL
    0
    8
    0
    310

    Graph of Turbidity( NTU) vs Coagulant dosage,ml


    14

    12

    10

    8
    Turbidity( NTU)

    Turbidity, NTU
    6

    0
    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    Coagulant, ml

    2.5

    3.0

    Graph of Turbidity (NTU) vs Flocculation,ml


    400

    350

    300

    250

    Turbidity (NTU)

    Turbidity (NTU)

    200

    150

    100

    50

    0
    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    Polymers

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    350.0

    300.0

    250.0

    200.0

    Turbidity, NTU

    Turbidity(NDU)
    Linear (Turbidity(NDU))

    150.0

    100.0

    50.0

    0.0
    5

    pH Value

    10

    11

    Conclution
    Based on the jar test that we was conducted, we was able to find the
    optimum coagulant d osage, optimum dosage of flocculants and the
    optimum pH value for removed the suspended so lid in the waste water.
    Not only that, by conducting this experiment we was able to see how eff
    ective the treatment of waste water with the help chemical substance
    compared to nature sett lement which not using any coagulation and
    flocculation agent. In this experiment the nature settlement is the control
    sample. These experiment also help us to be more understand about the
    mechanism of coagulant and flocculation in different and constant pH. Other
    than that, we was also able to evaluate the efficiency of coagulant. Based
    on these experiment, the optimum value for 1% of coagulant which is 1% of
    Aluminium Sulphate or also known as Alum is 1ml, the optimum value for
    1% of Flocculation which for these experiment we used 1% of polymer s
    olution is 2ml and the optimum pH value is 7 which is neutral . This
    experiment was obey the theory. theory of these experiment

    You might also like