FOC Power Penalty
FOC Power Penalty
FOC Power Penalty
The SNR calculation and or the BER calculation assumes that the optical signal consists
of ideal bit streams. That is, it assumes that the bit-1 consists of optical pulse of constant
energy, and there is no energy in bit-0.
In practice however, the bits are distorted due to various reasons and the optical signal is
degraded in addition to the system noise.
To compensate for the system degradation, the signal power has to be increased to
achieve the same SNR or BER performance as that of an ideal system. This increase in
power is called the Power Penalty.
There are two types of signal degradation which can contribute to the power penalty.
1. Degradation during propagation in the optical fiber
2. Degradation due to peripheral electronic and optic components in the system
like the lasers, photo-detectors, couplers etc.
For a source like LED, the spectral width is about 30-50 nm, giving spectral width of 3-5
THz. The coherence time of LED would be 0.2-0.3 psec.
Since the typical inter-modal dispersion inside a multimode fiber is few nsec/Km, even
for small networks, where usually the multi-mode fiber is used, the modal noise is very
small.
Modal noise becomes a problem when laser diodes are used as optical sources.
Dispersion
As seen earlier, the optical pulse broadens due to dispersion. On a single mode optical
fiber, the pulse broadening is due to chromatic dispersion.
The pulse broadening affects the system performance in two ways:
1. Part of the bit energy spreads in the neighboring bits causing inter-symbolinterference (ISI).
2. The reduction in the pulse energy because there is energy spread due to
dispersion.
Due to reduction in the pulse energy inside a bit, causes reduction in SNR and
consequently reduction in BER. To get the same BER back, the signal power has to be
increases, giving dispersion induced power penalty.
The dispersion induced power penalty depends upon many factors like, the pulse shape,
spectral profile of laser, fiber dispersion etc. The analysis however, generally carried out
assuming that the pulse broadening is Gaussian.
The dispersion induced power penalty then is related to the reduction in the peak of the
Gaussian due to dispersion.
Let a Gaussian pulse of width i be launched inside a fiber. The pulse is given as
p(t ) A exp(t 2 / 2 i2 ) / i 2
Due to dispersion the pulse will broaden to have a width of
o i2 ( DL ) 2
where D is the dispersion of the fiber, and is the spectral width of the source. L is the
length of the fiber.
The output pulse is
p (t ) A exp(t 2 / 2 o2 ) / o 2
The reduction in the peak amplitude of the pulse is
R i /o
1
1 ( DL / i ) 2
Now the ISI is minimized if 4 B o 1 , where B is the bit rate. Even for the equality
sign we get,
i R o R / 4 B
Substituting in above equation we get
1
1 (4 BDL / R ) 2
R 1 (4 BDL ) 2
The power penalty due to dispersion is
D 5 log 1 (4 BDL ) 2
D (dB)
0
0.088
0.378
0.97
2.22
rex I 0 / I1
The parameter Q (defined earlier) can be written as
1 rex 2 Pav
1 rex 0 1
P1 P2
2
receiver.
Inverting the relation we get
Pav (rex )
1 rex T Q
1 rex
We can note that for a given Q, the average power requirement increases with the
extinction ratio. We can then define the power penalty as
Pav (rex )
1 r ex
10 log
Pav (0)
1 r ex
ex 10 log
Following Fig. shows the power penalty as a function of the extinction ratio.
ex d
The power penalty may become significant if the semiconductor laser is biased above the
threshold. For lasers biased below threshold, the extinction ratio is typically 0.05 and the
power penalty is less than 0.4 dB.
The relative intensity noise can be treated as the shot noise, as this noise also has
multiplicative nature.
The RIN parameter can be defined as
rI
Pin 2
Pin
I Pin rI
The parameter Q is
2Pav
s2 I2 T
2Pav
s2 (2Pav rI ) 2 T
Pav (rI )
Q T qBQ 2
(1 rI2Q 2 )
I d
For rI 0.15 , the power penalty is infinite meaning the receiver will never function
satisfactorily no matter how much transmitter power is increased.
Timing Jitter
In a digital system the signal is generally sampled at the center of the pulse.
Due to inaccuracy of the clock recovery at the receiver, the sampling of the pulse is not
precisely at the center of the pulse but is little shifted in time.
The sampling instant jitters around the mean with some variance.
As such if the pulse has constant amplitude, the timing jitter does not affect the sampler
out put. However, due to dispersion and due to reshaping, the pulses are rectangular. The
sampling jitter then gets converted to the amplitude fluctuation which appears as the
noise on the output as shown in Fig.
t
The sampling jitter t is a random variable and hence the fluctuation in current is also a
random variable.
Due the fluctuations the mean of the peak current is reduced decreasing the SNR.
The SNR can be restored by increasing the pulse amplitude. Hence there is power
penalty for timing jitter.
For raised cosine pulse shaping, the can be analytically calculated.
A plot of power penalty due to timing jitter is shown in the Fig.
j d
The timing jitter penalty obviously depends upon the fractional timing error in
comparison to the bit duration. The plot therefore gives the power penalty as function of
product of the rms value of the timing jitter and the data rate (inverse of bit duration).
It can be noted that the power penalty very rapidly increases with the timing jitter. When
the rms value of the timing jitter is about 0.15, the power penalty becomes infinite. For a
Gaussian variable, the peak to peak deviation is about 6 times the standard deviation. A
0.15 fractional jitter means peak to peak variation in sampling time equal to the bit
duration. In this case then, the bits can not be sampled properly, and hence the power
penalty is infinite, meaning irrespective of the power, the system will never be able to get
the data correctly.