This document discusses two legal cases regarding foreign judgments. Borthwick v. Castro established that a foreign judgment is only presumptive evidence of a right between parties, and rejection can be justified by showing the issuing authority lacked jurisdiction. Nouvion v. Freeman found that foreign judgments will be recognized if they establish a debt or obligation exists, but will not be enforced if the foreign tribunal declares the debt or obligation does not exist.
This document discusses two legal cases regarding foreign judgments. Borthwick v. Castro established that a foreign judgment is only presumptive evidence of a right between parties, and rejection can be justified by showing the issuing authority lacked jurisdiction. Nouvion v. Freeman found that foreign judgments will be recognized if they establish a debt or obligation exists, but will not be enforced if the foreign tribunal declares the debt or obligation does not exist.
This document discusses two legal cases regarding foreign judgments. Borthwick v. Castro established that a foreign judgment is only presumptive evidence of a right between parties, and rejection can be justified by showing the issuing authority lacked jurisdiction. Nouvion v. Freeman found that foreign judgments will be recognized if they establish a debt or obligation exists, but will not be enforced if the foreign tribunal declares the debt or obligation does not exist.
This document discusses two legal cases regarding foreign judgments. Borthwick v. Castro established that a foreign judgment is only presumptive evidence of a right between parties, and rejection can be justified by showing the issuing authority lacked jurisdiction. Nouvion v. Freeman found that foreign judgments will be recognized if they establish a debt or obligation exists, but will not be enforced if the foreign tribunal declares the debt or obligation does not exist.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Borthwick v.
Castro (152 SCRA 229)
A foreign judgment against a person is merely presumptive evidence of a right as between the parties, and rejection thereof may be justified by evidence of a want of jurisdiction of the issuing authority.
Nouvion v. Freeman 59 L.J. Ch. 337
(1889) Foreign judgment will be given credit if it has established the existence of the debt or obligation. Foreign judgment will not be enforced if the foreign tribunal declares the nonexistence of the debt or obligation.