Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Bidding Recon

    Uploaded by

    Herbert Shirov Tendido Securata
    The supplier submitted a motion for reconsideration regarding an invitation to bid for the supply and delivery of sporting goods. The supplier was granted lot 2 but disqualified from lot 1. The supplier argues that the two lots should be considered as one contract since they have the same name and reference the same bidding process. The supplier requests to be qualified for both lots since some item prices were over while others were below the offered price, and the total proposed price was within budget.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Bidding Recon

    Uploaded by

    Herbert Shirov Tendido Securata
    30 views1 page
    The supplier submitted a motion for reconsideration regarding an invitation to bid for the supply and delivery of sporting goods. The supplier was granted lot 2 but disqualified from lot 1. The supplier argues that the two lots should be considered as one contract since they have the same name and reference the same bidding process. The supplier requests to be qualified for both lots since some item prices were over while others were below the offered price, and the total proposed price was within budget.

    Original Description:

    ????/

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The supplier submitted a motion for reconsideration regarding an invitation to bid for the supply and delivery of sporting goods. The supplier was granted lot 2 but disqualified from lot 1. The supplier argues that the two lots should be considered as one contract since they have the same name and reference the same bidding process. The supplier requests to be qualified for both lots since some item prices were over while others were below the offered price, and the total proposed price was within budget.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    30 views1 page

    Bidding Recon

    Uploaded by

    Herbert Shirov Tendido Securata
    The supplier submitted a motion for reconsideration regarding an invitation to bid for the supply and delivery of sporting goods. The supplier was granted lot 2 but disqualified from lot 1. The supplier argues that the two lots should be considered as one contract since they have the same name and reference the same bidding process. The supplier requests to be qualified for both lots since some item prices were over while others were below the offered price, and the total proposed price was within budget.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    September 28, 2015

    To: (SGD)
    BAC Chairman

    MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION


    Dear Sir/Madame:
    Greetings!
    The undersigned most respectfully avers that, on September 11, 2015, the
    University of Eastern Philippines Laoang, invited the herein undersigned to
    bid for the Supply and Delivery of Sporting Goods with ITB No. 2015-0713
    which covers two lots with PR. Nos. 15-6-165, dated May 26, 2015 and 15-6166, of the same date. As a consequence, the UEP Laoang grant the lot 2
    with PR. No. 15-6-166 to the undersigned and disqualified it in lot 1.
    It is the humble position of the undersigned that the two lots covered by the
    contract name For the Supply and Delivery of Sporting Goods with ITB No.
    Goods-2015-0713 refers to one but the same contract. And therefore, if
    awarded, only to one and the same bidder. And the bidder should not be
    disqualified on the ground that the price of some items is below to the offer
    price where in fact and in truth some items are also over price, in which case
    can be carry over. After all, it is the grand total price which determine the
    sufficiency of the total budget for the said project.
    Wherefore, premises considered, it is most respectfully prays that the
    undersigned be qualified not only to one lot but to the two lots considering
    that both are covered by the same contract name and the disqualification to
    the other lot is improper.
    Thank you,
    Very respectfully yours;
    Supplier
    By:
    Proprietor

    You might also like