Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Mariano v. People: Celedonio Mesa Had A Barbershop Establishment

    Uploaded by

    123014stephen
    1. U.S. v. Dacquel discusses a case where a man used a walking stick in a crowd to disperse people without intending serious harm. 2. People v. Diaz notes that old age alone cannot be considered an aggravating circumstance if there was no intent to offend based on age. 3. People v. Atienza describes a drinking party where one guest made inappropriate comments about another guest's wife, leading to an argument and demands for the guest to leave. 4. Mariano v. People discusses a case where a man, who was allowed to sleep in a barbershop, stole money from the owner's trunk while the owner was absent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Mariano v. People: Celedonio Mesa Had A Barbershop Establishment

    Uploaded by

    123014stephen
    14 views1 page
    1. U.S. v. Dacquel discusses a case where a man used a walking stick in a crowd to disperse people without intending serious harm. 2. People v. Diaz notes that old age alone cannot be considered an aggravating circumstance if there was no intent to offend based on age. 3. People v. Atienza describes a drinking party where one guest made inappropriate comments about another guest's wife, leading to an argument and demands for the guest to leave. 4. Mariano v. People discusses a case where a man, who was allowed to sleep in a barbershop, stole money from the owner's trunk while the owner was absent.

    Original Description:

    cases

    Original Title

    Crimi Law Cases

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. U.S. v. Dacquel discusses a case where a man used a walking stick in a crowd to disperse people without intending serious harm. 2. People v. Diaz notes that old age alone cannot be considered an aggravating circumstance if there was no intent to offend based on age. 3. People v. Atienza describes a drinking party where one guest made inappropriate comments about another guest's wife, leading to an argument and demands for the guest to leave. 4. Mariano v. People discusses a case where a man, who was allowed to sleep in a barbershop, stole money from the owner's trunk while the owner was absent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    14 views1 page

    Mariano v. People: Celedonio Mesa Had A Barbershop Establishment

    Uploaded by

    123014stephen
    1. U.S. v. Dacquel discusses a case where a man used a walking stick in a crowd to disperse people without intending serious harm. 2. People v. Diaz notes that old age alone cannot be considered an aggravating circumstance if there was no intent to offend based on age. 3. People v. Atienza describes a drinking party where one guest made inappropriate comments about another guest's wife, leading to an argument and demands for the guest to leave. 4. Mariano v. People discusses a case where a man, who was allowed to sleep in a barbershop, stole money from the owner's trunk while the owner was absent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    1. U.S. v.

    Dacquel: The stick was about the size and weight of an


    ordinary walking cane, and, doubtless, the accused laid about him in
    the crowd, in his efforts to make it disperse, without any thought or
    intention of doing any of the people any serious injury, or of heaping
    contumely or insult upon the child because of her sex or her tender
    age.
    2. People v. Diaz: The circumstance of old age cannot be considered
    aggravating. There was no evidence that the accused deliberately
    intended to offend or insult the age of the victim. That circumstance
    may be absorbed in treachery.
    3. Provocation cancelled dwelling
    a. People v. Atienza: When the drinking party was in full swing
    and the host and his guests were quite drunk, Atty. Parentela, Sr.
    touched the knees and thigh of Eleanor Camacho, saying: "Pare,
    why is it that my comadre Eleanor has some blackish spots on
    her thighs, on her back and stomach?" Felix got angry and said:
    "Why do you know, pare, that there are blackish spots on the
    body of my wife. Maybe you have 'skinned' her, that is why you
    know. x x x A heated verbal altercation followed, with Parentela
    throwing curses and insulting epithets at Atienza who was finally
    told to "get out."
    4. Mariano v. People: Celedonio Mesa had a barbershop establishment
    on Herran Street where he and his brother-in-law slept upstairs.
    Sometime on September 9, 1937 and prior thereto, the appellant, upon
    his request and out of charity, was permitted to sleep in the same
    place. On the night of that date, the appellant, during the absence of
    Celedonio, took from the latter's trunk, which was upstairs, the amount
    of P10.20.

    You might also like