Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Askhseis Gia Ta Eidh Sullogismou: Maria Crhstou

    Uploaded by

    Kally Liotsika
    1. This document discusses types of reasoning and provides examples to illustrate each type. 2. It differentiates between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning draws conclusions necessarily from given premises, while inductive reasoning draws conclusions that are probable based on patterns or examples. 3. Examples are provided to demonstrate inductive reasoning, including observations about laws not always being followed, personal experiences extrapolating to generalizations, and inferences about increasing complexity over time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Askhseis Gia Ta Eidh Sullogismou: Maria Crhstou

    Uploaded by

    Kally Liotsika
    12 views2 pages
    1. This document discusses types of reasoning and provides examples to illustrate each type. 2. It differentiates between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning draws conclusions necessarily from given premises, while inductive reasoning draws conclusions that are probable based on patterns or examples. 3. Examples are provided to demonstrate inductive reasoning, including observations about laws not always being followed, personal experiences extrapolating to generalizations, and inferences about increasing complexity over time.

    Original Description:

    syll eidi likeio

    Original Title

    Ask Syllog Eidi

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. This document discusses types of reasoning and provides examples to illustrate each type. 2. It differentiates between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning draws conclusions necessarily from given premises, while inductive reasoning draws conclusions that are probable based on patterns or examples. 3. Examples are provided to demonstrate inductive reasoning, including observations about laws not always being followed, personal experiences extrapolating to generalizations, and inferences about increasing complexity over time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    12 views2 pages

    Askhseis Gia Ta Eidh Sullogismou: Maria Crhstou

    Uploaded by

    Kally Liotsika
    1. This document discusses types of reasoning and provides examples to illustrate each type. 2. It differentiates between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning draws conclusions necessarily from given premises, while inductive reasoning draws conclusions that are probable based on patterns or examples. 3. Examples are provided to demonstrate inductive reasoning, including observations about laws not always being followed, personal experiences extrapolating to generalizations, and inferences about increasing complexity over time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    1

    ASKHSEIS GIA TA EIDH SULLOGISMOU


    A) Me poia sullogistik pore a (paragwgik -epagwgik )
    anapt ssetai h pr th par grafoV tou kei nou;
    Na dikaiolog sete thn ap nths saV.
    so procwre o nqrwpoV sthn hlik a kai apokt egal terh
    pe ra thV zw V, t so te nei na paradecte ( llo q a, an telik to
    kataf rnei) ti pr pei na perior zei tiV axi seiV tou kai na h
    peri nei ap to to ton k so periss tera ap sa e nai dunat n
    na tou paracwrhqo n. S' aut th dus resth all s frona
    paradoc coun ap thn an nuh kai thn ep nuh quosof a doqe
    poll V apofqegatik V diatup seiV pou c rh sth lakwnik tht
    touV noun sth n h kai e kola perno n ap st a se st a ap deixh ti ekfr zoun na pol tio qhsa risa thV anqr pinhV
    sune dhshV: B ltion to h ce ron = kal tero to lig tero kak , To
    kal tero e nai ecqr V tou kalo , St rge ta par nta = na ant ceiV
    to par n, Mhd n gan = t pota uperbolik , ktl. ktl.

    B) i e douV sullogistik
    epiceir ata.
    1. To ner p gwse.
    baqo V.

    pore a akolouqo n ta parak tw

    ra h qerokras a e nai k tw ap 0

    2. Oi nootage V pol teV den paraba noun to n o. O K staV


    tan p nta nootag V kai den qa par baine pot to n o.
    3. To autok nhto pou ag rase o pat raV ou cei aer sakouV.
    ra kai aut pou sk ftoai na agor sw eg qa cei
    aer sako.
    4. O nqrwpoV diaq tei kai crhsiopoie th logik tou. ra
    e nai an teroV ap ta lla nta tou plan th.
    Ap th stig pou ei qhke o ariq V twn genn sewn sth
    c ra aV aux qhke o ariq V twn suntaxio cwn. ra h
    upogennhtik thta qa zhi sei ta asfalistik tae a.

    MARIA CRHSTOU

    MARIA CRHSTOU

    You might also like