Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 50 views

    (CONSTI) Deloso Vs Domingo

    Uploaded by

    Marc Virtucio
    Governor Deloso seeks to stop Deputy Ombudsman Domingo from investigating charges that Deloso was involved in multiple murders. Deloso claims the Ombudsman lacks jurisdiction over acts not connected to his duties as governor. However, witnesses testify that it was Deloso's group who ambushed others, killing three. Deputy Ombudsman Domingo denies Deloso's motion to dismiss, finding that the Ombudsman has jurisdiction to investigate any acts of public officials, not just those related to their official functions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    (CONSTI) Deloso Vs Domingo

    Uploaded by

    Marc Virtucio
    50 views1 page
    Governor Deloso seeks to stop Deputy Ombudsman Domingo from investigating charges that Deloso was involved in multiple murders. Deloso claims the Ombudsman lacks jurisdiction over acts not connected to his duties as governor. However, witnesses testify that it was Deloso's group who ambushed others, killing three. Deputy Ombudsman Domingo denies Deloso's motion to dismiss, finding that the Ombudsman has jurisdiction to investigate any acts of public officials, not just those related to their official functions.

    Original Description:

    Deloso v. Domingo

    Original Title

    [CONSTI] Deloso vs Domingo

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Governor Deloso seeks to stop Deputy Ombudsman Domingo from investigating charges that Deloso was involved in multiple murders. Deloso claims the Ombudsman lacks jurisdiction over acts not connected to his duties as governor. However, witnesses testify that it was Deloso's group who ambushed others, killing three. Deputy Ombudsman Domingo denies Deloso's motion to dismiss, finding that the Ombudsman has jurisdiction to investigate any acts of public officials, not just those related to their official functions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    50 views1 page

    (CONSTI) Deloso Vs Domingo

    Uploaded by

    Marc Virtucio
    Governor Deloso seeks to stop Deputy Ombudsman Domingo from investigating charges that Deloso was involved in multiple murders. Deloso claims the Ombudsman lacks jurisdiction over acts not connected to his duties as governor. However, witnesses testify that it was Deloso's group who ambushed others, killing three. Deputy Ombudsman Domingo denies Deloso's motion to dismiss, finding that the Ombudsman has jurisdiction to investigate any acts of public officials, not just those related to their official functions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Deloso vs.

    Domingo
    Governor Deloso of Zambales seeks to stop the respondent,
    Domingo (Deputy Ombudsman) from conducting a preliminary
    investigation of the charge against him of multiple murder.
    1. Claims that the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction in
    investigating acts not connected with his duties as governor
    2. Same goes for Tanodbayan.
    FACTS:

    Governor alledges that at 1:30am, returning from a prewedding celebration, the governors convoy was ambushed.
    After being able to escape, he later found out that the three
    ambushers were killed, while his own group suffered no
    casualties.
    Testimonies of witnesses say otherwise.
    o State that it was the Governors group who were the
    ambushers.
    o Witnesses identified the escort of Deloso.
    Deloso files motion to dismiss on the grounds of lack of
    jurisdiction by the Special Prosecutor.
    Domingo, Deputy Ombudsman, denies motion to dismiss
    given that the Constitution empowers the Ombudsman to
    investigate any act of omission of any public official.
    o Not limited to an officials discharge of his public
    functions given
    o Any act or omission may do for the Ombudsman to act
    promptly on complaints filed in any form.
    o Encompasses all kinds of misfeasance.

    Decision:
    Ombudsman does have Jurisdiction to hold investigation.

    You might also like