Grades 7-8 Elkgrove Rubrics
Grades 7-8 Elkgrove Rubrics
Grades 7-8 Elkgrove Rubrics
The following writing rubrics for the Common Core were developed by the Elk Grove Unified School District in Elk Grove,
California. There are rubrics for each major writing type described in Writing Standards 13: argument, exposition, and
narration. Posted with permission from the EGUSD Curriculum and Professional Learning Department.
Argument (W.1)
CPL 12.10.2012
CCSS
W:
1a
1c
1e
4
Evidence/
Support
CCSS -W:
1b
9
Analysis
CCSS-W:
1b
9
5 - Advanced
(Revised 12.10.12)
4 - Proficient
3 - Basic
2 - Below Basic
Superficially develops
claim(s) with body paragraphs
Provides a conclusion which
repetitively or partially
supports claim(s)
Creates some cohesion
through basic
transition/linking words,
phrases, and/or clauses within
or between paragraphs
Includes adequate progression
of ideas from beginning to end
Provides limited and/or
superficial evidence to support
claim(s)
Ineffectively integrates or
cites adequate sources and/or
text evidence
Minimally refutes specific
counter-claim(s)
Shows superficial
understanding of topic or text
Uses some valid and accurate
reasoning to connect evidence
with claim(s)
Inadequately develops
claim(s) with minimal body
paragraphs
Provides an inadequate
conclusion
Uses limited and/or
inappropriate
transition/linking words,
phrases, or clauses
Includes uneven progression
of ideas from beginning to
end
Provides minimal and/or
irrelevant evidence to
support claim(s)
Incorrectly integrates or cites
sources and/or text evidence
that may not be credible
Acknowledges alternate or
opposing claim(s)
Shows limited and/or flawed
understanding of topic or text
Uses limited, simplistic
and/or flawed reasoning to
connect evidence with
Omits conclusion
Uses few to no transition/
linking words, phrases, or
clauses
Includes little or no
discernible organization of
ideas
Provides inaccurate, little, or
no evidence to support
claim(s)
Does not use or cite sources
and/or text evidence
Fails to acknowledge
alternate or opposing claim(s)
Shows no and/or inaccurate
understanding of topic or text
Reasoning is missing or does
not connect evidence with
claim(s)
claim(s)
Language
CCSS
L:
1
2
3
CPL 12.10.2012
Strand
Writing
CPL 12.10.2012
Language
CPL 12.10.2012
Informational/Expository (W.2)
CPL 12.10.2012
CCSS W:
2a
2c
2f
4
Development
CCSS -W:
2
2b
9
Language
CCSS L:**
1
2
3
4
CCSS -W:
5 Advanced
(above grade level)
(Created 4.8.13)
4 Proficient
(at grade level)
3 - Basic
2 - Below Basic
Uses few to no
transition/linking words,
phrases, or clauses
Includes little or no
discernible organization of
ideas
Incorrectly integrates/cites
sources
Shows limited or flawed
understanding of topic or text
CPL 12.10.2012
Strand
Writing
1.
Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas, concepts, and
information through the selection, organization, and analysis of relevant content.
a. Introduce a topic or thesis statement clearly, previewing what is to follow; organize
ideas, concepts, and information,
b. Using strategies such as definition, classification, comparison/contrast, and
cause/effect; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., charts, tables), and
multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.
c. Develop the topic with relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or
other information and examples.
d. Use appropriate transitions to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among
ideas and concepts.
e. Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain
the topic.
f. Establish and maintain a formal style.
g. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the
information or explanation presented.
4. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and
style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. (Grade- specific expectations for writing
types are defined in standards 13.)
9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and
research.
a. Apply grade 7 Reading standards to literature (e.g., Compare and contrast a
fictional portrayal of a time, place, or character and a historical account of the same
period as a means of understanding how authors of fiction use or alter history).
b. Apply grade 7 Reading standards to literary nonfiction (e.g., Trace and evaluate
the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound
and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims).
CPL 12.10.2012
4. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are
appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. (Grade-specific expectations for writing types are
defined in standards 1-3).
9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and
research.
a. Apply grade 8 Reading standards to literature (e.g., Analyze how a modern work of
fiction draws on themes, patterns of events, or character types from myths,
traditional stories, or religious works such as the Bible, including describing how the
material is rendered new).
b. Apply grade 8 Reading standards to literary nonfiction (e.g., Delineate and evaluate
the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound
and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is
introduced).
Language
CPL 12.10.2012
Narrative (W.3)
CPL 12.10.2012
CCSS -W:
3a
4
Organization/
Plot
CCSS W:
3a
3c
3e
4
Narrative
Techniques
CCSS -W:
3b
3d
Language
CCSS L:
1
2
3
5 Advanced
(above grade level)
(Created 2.14.13)
4 Proficient
(at grade level)
3 - Basic
2 - Below Basic
Attempts to introduce a
narrator and/or characters
Organizes an event
sequence but may not be
logical
Uses some transitional
words, phrases, and clauses
to convey sequence and
signal shifts from one time
frame or setting to another
(may be repetitive)
Provides a weak conclusion
that may not connect to the
narrated experiences or
events
CPL 12.10.2012
Language
Writing
Strand
CPL 12.10.2012