Investment: Anthony Murphy Nuffield College
Investment: Anthony Murphy Nuffield College
Investment: Anthony Murphy Nuffield College
Business investment plus residential investment plus inventories What about R&D, software and other intangibles? Private v. public investment e.g. infrastructure. Should schooling count as investment?
Kt I t Kt 1
Fig. 6.13
Y =F(K ) cK
OutputOutput
K
Marginal productivity of capital
C
Capital stock
MPK
Capital stock
Fig. 6.14
cK
Old
slope =c
K
Marginal productivity of capital
C
Capital stock
Technological progress makes more output possible with the same capital stock. Desired capital stock increases.
MPK MPK
K K
Capital stock
Adding Dynamics
Add ad hoc dynamics e.g. simple partial adjustment model: K t I t K t 1 ( K t* K t 1 ) Add quadratic adjustment costs and rational expectations ( la Sargent). Now expectations of all future prices etc. matter. No free lunch! Need to model expectations. Hard to model realistically.
Fig. 6.15
Investment I/K
Tobins q
Installation costs explain why q is not always equal to one. These additional costs slow the adjustment to the long run. Diagram of MCI and MPK.. However, in this set up, investment depends on marginal q, as opposed to the average q proposed by Tobin.
Fig. 6.17
If there were no costs of adjustment, the present value of the marginal cost of capital would be independent of the investment rate.
1 C
MPK1
(I K )
Investment rate (I/K)
(a)
Note if there were no depreciation, the investment rate, I/K, = K/K, the rate of change of the capital stock.
Fig. 6.17
q1
1
C
MPK1
(I K ) (I K )
Investment rate (I/K)
However the faster we try to install new capital, the more it adds to the cost of that capital. Haste makes waste. Hence the upward slope of the marginal cost of investment with respect to the investment rate.
(a)
MPK=Marginal return of new investment
Fig. 6.17
Tobins q
Present value of MPK, cost of capital
With the investment rate corresponding to the rate at point A, in the following period there will be more capital and a lower MPK. The investment rate next period will fall too (as will Tobins q), ultimately heading toward a value of unity and no more investment.
q 1 q2
1
A
B
MPK2
MPK1
(I K )2
(I K )1
(b)
MPK=Marginal return of new investment
Tobins q In Practise
Hayashi (1982) estimated a simple investment equation on US data for 1953 to 1976: (I/K)t= const + 0.043qt R2 = 0.46, DW = 0.43 and the t stat on average qt is about 5. Problematic equation. Why? Adding some dynamics helps a bit. However, other quantity type variables matter (so q is not really akin to a sufficient statistic). Lower correlation between (I/K)t and qt in recent years.
Empirics (Contd)
There are a large no. of micro (panel data) and macro (time series) studies of the q theory of investment. Macro studies frequently find: - Price effects: a modest role for capital costs (q and/or its components including the real interest rate); - Quantity effects: a substantial role for output or cash flow variables (since, in the UK and US, a lot of investment is financed from retained earnings).
Overview of Investment
Investment is the most volatile component of aggregate demand. The demand for capital depends on real interest rates, current and expected future output and taxes. Investment reflects the adjustment of the existing capital stock to the current demand for capital. Investment is a primary link from monetary policy to aggregate demand.