Pellet
Pellet
Pellet
Copyright
WIP Renewable Energies Sylvensteinstrasse 2 81369 Munich, Germany and Holzforschung Austria Franz Grill Strasse 7 1030 Vienna, Austria October 2009
Prepared by
WIP Renewable Energies Wolfgang Hiegl Rainer Janssen [email protected] Tel. +49 89 72012 731 and Holzforschung Austria Wilfried Pichler [email protected] Tel. +43-1-798 2623 16
The pellets@las project is supported by the European Commission under the EIE programme (EIE/06/020/SI2.448557). The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. 2. 3. 4.
Introduction ......................................................................4 Quality requirements on pellets......................................5 Pellet quality: Standards and certification.....................6 Existing national certification schemes.........................7
DINplus (Germany) ....................................................................................................................................... 7 NORM M 7135 (Austria) ......................................................................................................................... 10 NF Granules Biocombustibles (France) ...................................................................................................... 11 Pellet Gold (Italy) ........................................................................................................................................ 13
5. 6.
Pellet quality issues in selected countries ..................14 Development of European pellet-related standards ...15
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 15 Fuel specification and classes prEN 14961 .............................................................................................. 16 Fuel quality assurance prEN 15234 .......................................................................................................... 22 International standardisation (ISO/TC 238) ................................................................................................ 22
7. 8.
Page 3
WIP / HFA
1. Introduction
Standardisation aims at removing trade and application barriers by establishing unification (of concepts, procedures and products) within a national or international community of concerned stakeholders. Standards increase economization, compatibility, user-friendliness and security in the application and exchange of products and services. Quality is a central issue for the further development of pellet markets. Especially the residential heating sector depends on reliable fuel quality since it is crucial for a reliable and economic use of small-scale pellet heating systems. The importance of quality standards and assurance became obvious in the last years in Germany and Austria where the early introduction of pellet-related standards and certification systems certainly was a stimulating factor for the dynamic development of residential pellet heating markets. Now, a set of European standards related to solid biofuels is under preparation. This is a positive step towards the unification of the European pellet market and will contribute to enhancing market development all over Europe. However, standards alone are not sufficient. Certification and the control of products and of the whole supply chain are desirable. Existing national and international certification systems such as DINplus contributed a lot to quality assurance and to gaining consumers confidence. However, they all have certain drawbacks and none of them covers the whole supply chain within one system. Based upon the new European standards, the German Pellet Association (DEPV), together with other partners, is currently developing a new certification system with a European scope and a more holistic approach. The system claims the potential to replace the other existing certificates that are partly well accepted by stakeholders such as boiler manufacturers and end-consumers. The original scope of this report, according to the pellets@las work programme, was to provide recommendations to the European standardisation process. However, this was and still is done in a direct way by pellets@las partner HFA (Holzforschung Austria) being an official member of the responsible European Standardisation Committee CEN TC 335 and pellets@las partner FORCE Technology being a member of the Danish mirror group. This way, pellets@las results and findings were directly incorporated in the process. By now, the development of standards is close to completion. This document now aims at informing a broader target group about the current situation and future developments of pellet standardisation and certification. This information is mainly relevant for two major stakeholder groups. End-consumers should be clear about the background and meaning of pellet quality and quality certificates when buying pellets and pellet producers will have to prepare for the requirements of upcoming standards and certification schemes and they also have to decide upon strategies how the use of standards and the participation in certification schemes can enable the access to certain pellet markets.
Page 4
WIP / HFA
1 2
Obernberger et al., Chemical properties of solid biofuels significance and impact, Graz University.
Obernberger et al., Aktuelle Erkenntnisse im Bereich der Feinstaubemissionen bei Pelletsfeuerungen, Graz University.
WIP / HFA
Page 5
Quality marks
NORM M 7135
DIN 51731
SS 187120
others
CEN
Influence
ISO
Figure 1: Overview on existing and future systems for wood pellet quality specification
from:
Englisch,
M.
(ofi,
Austria);
Europische
Normen
fr
Page 6
WIP / HFA
Unit Diameter Length Density Water content Abrasion Ash content Energy content Sulphur content Chlorine content Nitrogen content Heavy metals Kg / dm % % % MJ / kg % % % %
3
DIN plus 4 - 10 <5xD > 1.12 < 10 < 2.3 < 0.5 > 18 < 0.04 < 0.02 < 0.3
NORM M 7135 4 - 10 <5xD > 1.12 < 10 < 2.3 < 0.5 > 18 < 0.04 < 0.02 < 0.3 not regulated
mm
regulated
DINplus Zertifizierungsprogramm Holzpellets zur Verwendung in Kleinfeuerungssttten, DIN CERTCO, 2007, available at www.dincertco.de DIN 51731 Presslinge aus naturbelassenem Holz HP 5; available at www.beuth.de NORM M 7135 Presslinge aus naturbelassenem Holz oder naturbelassener Rinde, Pellets und Briketts HP 1, available at www.as-plus.at
WIP / HFA
5 6
Page 7
As the DIN standard did not show to be useful, DIN CERTCO developed the DINplus certification scheme for high quality wood pellets in 2002. It combines characteristics of both the German DIN 51731 (e.g. testing of heavy metal contents) and the Austrian NORM M 7135 (e.g. high quality requirements in general) (Figure 2). This scheme includes the establishment of internal quality management and annual, external controls without announcement. DINplus contributed a lot to the promotion of the residential pellet market in Germany and today, it is the most important quality label for high quality wood pellets worldwide. In total, 102 pellet producers are DINplus certified (October 2009) and 61 of these are based in Germany. Figure 3 shows the countries, where DINplus is used (Certificates in Germany are not shown). The DINplus certified producers with known production capacity represent a total capacity of around 3.5 million tons. Considering the other 40 small and medium scale producers with unknown capacity, the total production capacity for DINplus pellets certainly exceeds 4 million tons.
Most of the producers in Figure 3 use DINplus certification only. However, most DINplus certified producers in Austria have obtained DINplus certification following a successful NORM certification. This possibility is also often used in the Czech Republic. The German DINplus producers with known production capacity represent a total capacity of at least 2.2 million tons. In addition, 25 producers with unknown capacity
Page 8
WIP / HFA
are certified. This means that the largest part of the German production capacity (in total: 2.4 million tons in 20087) is DINplus certified. For producers e.g. in France, Belgium and Switzerland, the DINplus certificate certainly is a marketing instrument for selling pellets in their own home countries, while it provides access to Central European residential pellet heating markets to export-oriented producers in e.g. Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania and Argentina (So far, DINplus pellet exports from Argentina to Europe are rather rare). Additional information In addition to pellet quality certification, DIN CERTCO offers DINplus certification for wood briquettes and pellet stoves. Furthermore, producers, traders and retailers with their own pellet distribution can get certificates for their pellet logistics (complementary to NORM M 7136). However, only 8 companies are certified (all of them based in Germany) and this certification does not seem to be well accepted by relevant market stakeholders.
www.depv.de
WIP / HFA
Page 9
Additional information Other pellet-related standards in Austria are concerned with pellet logistics (M 7136) and pellet storage tanks (M 7137). Furthermore, standards for non-wood biomass pellets were or are being developed: M 7139 on energy grains, C 4000 on Miscanthus pellets and C 4002 on straw pellets.
Page 10
WIP / HFA
Page 11
Caractristiques
Taux dhumidit sur brut (%) Pouvoir Calorifique Infrieur sur brut, PCI (MJ/kg) (Pour information) PCI en kWh/kg Masse volumique 3 apparente (kg/m ) Durabilit mcanique (% en masse des granuls aprs essai) Quantit de fines (% en masse, <3,15mm) Aprs production la sortie de lusine Taux de cendres (% en masse sur produit sec) Chlore, Cl (% en masse sur produit sec) Azote, N (% en masse sur produit sec) Soufre, S (% en masse sur produit sec)
10%
10%
15%
11%
15%
16,5
16,5
15,4
15,8
14,9
4,6
4,6
4,3
4,4
4,1
650
650
650
650
650
97,5%
95%
95%
95%
92%
1%
2%
3%
2%
3%
0,7%
1,5%
3%
5%
7%
0,03%
0,05%
0,05%
0,2%
0,3%
0,3%
0,3%
0,5%
1,5%
2%
0,05%
0,08%
0,08%
0,2%
0,2%
Figure 5: Quality requirements on fuel pellets, according to NF Granules Biocombustibles; 8 Table taken from ( ).
Page 12
WIP / HFA
Parametro Contenuto idrico (tal quale) Ceneri PCI Azoto - (N) Cloro (Cl) Zolfo (S) Massa sterica Durabilit meccanica Formaldeide (HCOH) Radioattivit Agenti leganti
LIMITI AIEL <10 1 16,9 0,3 <0,03 <0,05 >600 97,7 1,5 <6 Indicare valore
Figure 6: Quality requirements on fuel pellets, according to Pellet Gold (Italy); Table taken from ( )
10
Figure 6 shows part of the parameters controlled by Pellet Gold. Besides the common parameters, formaldehyde contents are measured. More recently, following an incident with possibly radioactive pellets, AIEL also introduced a maximum value for radioactivity. The requirements of Pellet Gold take into consideration the raw material situation in Italy. The widely available wood materials are characterized by higher ash and slightly higher chlorine content. Therefore, the threshold values are higher than foreseen by the European standard for A1 quality. In October 2009, 11 Italian wood pellet producers are certified. Certification might not appear to be feasible for the numerous small-scale producers in Italy. However, despite the small number of certificates, Pellet Gold still is the most successful quality label in Italy since there is no DINplus certified and only one NORM certified producer.
10
Page 13
11 12
www.uni.com www.r-e-a.net
13
The British BioGen Code of Good Practice for Biofuel pellets and pellet burning appliances <25kW; April 2000.
WIP / HFA
Page 14
high. Proper standards are slowly gaining market shares and the large consumers have defined their own quality requirements. The Czech Republic is a pellet exporting country with a small domestic demand. Pellet producers aiming at residential heating markets in Germany and Austria therefore have to be certified. With 3 DINplus and 7 NORM certificates (3 companies have both), high quality pellets are produced at a significant scale in the Czech Republic. The situation is similar in Poland. There are two large producers (Barlinek and Stelmet) with DINplus certificates. Both companies are based close to the German border. DINplus and/or NORM certified producers are also found in other exportoriented countries such as Romania, Slovakia, Latvia, Ukraine, Spain and Argentina.
14
Mohrig V. et al. (DBFZ); Pre-normative research on solid biofuels for improved European standards; 17th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition; 29 June 3 July 2009, hamburg, Germany.
WIP / HFA
Page 15
Part 1: prEN-14961-1
Table 1: Classification system for solid biomass Table 2: Traded forms of solid biofuels Tables 3-15: Master Tables for biofuel trade forms
Table 3: Master Table for trade form briquettes Example: Table 4: Master Table for trade form pellets Example: Table 5: Master Table for trade form wood chips
Part 1 (General requirements), part 2 (Product standard for wood pellets) and part 6 (Product standard for non-wood pellets) are briefly described below.
Page 16
WIP / HFA
Part 1: General requirements (prEN 14961-1) To accomplish this, prEn 14961-1 contains 15 tables (2 general tables and 13 Master Tables for different biomass trade forms). prEN 14961-1-Table 1 provides a hierarchical classification system for the origins and sources of biomass, distinguishing four basic types of biomass: woody biomass, herbaceous biomass, fruit biomass as well as blends and mixtures thereof. With this system, the origin and source of biomass can be described with a four-digit number. Figure 8 only shows the part dealing with woody biomass.
1. Woody biomass
1.1.1.1 Deciduous 1.1.1.2 Coniferous 1.1.1.3 Short rotation coppice 1.1.1.4 Bushes 1.1.1.5 Blends and mixtures
1.1.2.1 Deciduous 1.1.2.2 Coniferous 1.1.2.3 Short rotation coppice 1.1.2.4 Bushes 1.1.2.5 Blends and mixtures
1.1.3 Stemwood
1.1.4.1 Fresh/Green, Deciduous (incl. leaves) 1.1.4.2 Fresh/Green, Coniferous (incl. leaves) 1.1.4.3 Stored, Deciduous 1.1.4.4 Stored, Coniferous 1.1.4.5 Blends and mixtures
1.1.5 Stumps/roots
1.1.5.1 Deciduous 1.1.5.2 Coniferous 1.1.5.3 Short rotation coppice 1.1.5.4 Bushes 1.1.5.5 Blends and mixtures
1.1.6 Bark (from forestry operations) 1.1.7 Segregated wood from gardens, parks, roadside maintenance, vineyards and fruit orchards 1.1.8 Blends and mixtures 1.2 By-products and residues from wood processing industry 1.2.1 Chemically untreated wood residues 1.2.1.1 Without bark, Deciduous 1.2.1.2 Without bark, Coniferous 1.2.1.3 With bark, Deciduous 1.2.1.4 With bark, Coniferous 1.2.1.5 Bark (from industry operations) 1.2.2 Chemically treated wood residues, fibres and wood constituents 1.2.2.1 Without bark 1.2.2.2 With bark 1.2.2.3 Bark (from industry operations) 1.2.2.4 Fibres and wood constituents 1.2.3 Blends and mixtures 1.3 Used wood 1.3.1 Chemically untreated wood 1.3.1.1 Without bark 1.3.1.2 With bark 1.3.1.3 Bark 1.3.2 Chemically treated wood 1.3.2.1 Without bark 1.3.2.1 With bark 1.3.2.3 Bark 1.3.3 Blends and mixtures 1.4 Blends and mixtures
Figure 8: Classification of origin and sources of solid biomass; From: CEN/TC 335prEN 14961-1 (Table 1)
Page 17
WIP / HFA
prEN 14961-1-Table 2 (see Figure 9) defines a number of commonly used trade forms of solid biofuels (briquettes, chips, bales, etc) and refers to the respective Master Tables that specifically address one trade form and define normative (mandatory) and informative (voluntary) fuel properties that have to be or can be stated by the fuel supplier.
Fuel name
Typical particle size > 500 mm 5 mm to 100 mm Varying 100 mm to 1000 mm Varying Varying < 1 mm 1 mm to 5 mm 1 mm to 30 mm D 25 mm D < 25 mm
Whole tree (Table 15) Wood chips (Table 5) Hog fuel (Table 6) Log wood/firewood (Table 7) Bark (Table 10) Bundle (Table 15) Fuel powder (Table 15) Sawdust (Table 8) Shavings (Table 9) Briquettes (Table 3) Pellets (Table 4) Bales (Table 11) Small square bales Big square bales Round bales Chopped straw or energy grass (Table 15) Grain (Table 12, Table 13) or seed (Table 13, Table 14) Fruit stones or kernel (Table 13) Fibre cake (Table 15)
No preparation or delimbed Cutting with sharp tools Crushing with blunt tools Cutting with sharp tools Debarking residue from trees; Can be shredded or unshredded Lengthways oriented & bound Milling Cutting with sharp tools Planing with sharp tools Mechanical compression Mechanical compression
Compressed and bound to squares Compressed and bound to squares Compressed and bound to cylinders Chopped during harvesting or before combustion No preparation or drying except for process operations necessary for storage for cereal grain No preparation or pressing and extraction by chemicals Prepared from fibrous waste by dewatering
Figure 9: Major traded forms of solid biofuels; From: CEN/TC 335prEN 14961-1 (Table 2)
prEN 14961-1-Table 4 (see Figure 10 on next page) is the Master Table for pellets (wood and other). The Master Tables define a number of classes for each parameter across a wide range. Again, this shall provide a common language to European market participants who can arrange flexible agreements on biofuel properties with these definitions.
Page 18
WIP / HFA
Figure 10: Master table Specification of properties for pellets; From: CEN/TC 335prEN 14961-1 (Table 4)
Page 19 WIP / HFA
Part 2: Product standard for wood pellets (prEN 14961-2) As already said, the standard prEN 14961 is planned to consist of 6 parts. The general part 1 was described above. Parts 2-6 are product standards similar to e.g. NORM standards, defining product quality requirements by means of minimum/maximum thresholds for certain parameters. The trade forms addressed are wood pellets (Part 2, see Figure 11), wood briquettes (Part 3), wood chips (Part 4), firewood (Part 5) and non-wood pellets (Part 6). Figure 11 shows the latest draft (July 2009) of Table 1 in Part 2 (prEN 14961-2). Please note that the details are still under discussion.
Property class Origin and source a Unit A1 1.1.3 Stemwood 1.2.1 Chemically untreated wood residues A2 1.1.1 Whole trees without roots 1.1.3 Stemwood 1.1.4 Logging residues 1.1.6 Bark 1.2.1 Chemically untreated wood residues D06 6 1; a 3,15 L 40 D08 8 1; a 3,15 L 40 b M10 10 A1.0 1,0 DU97.5 97,5 F1.0 1,0 B 1.1. Forest, plantation and other virgin wood 1.2. By-products and residues from wood processing industry 1.3 Used wood D06 6 1; a 3,15 L 40 b D08 8 1; a 3,15 L 40 b M10 10 A3.0 3,0 DU97.5 97,5 F1.0 1,0
mm
D06 6 1; a 3,15 L 40 b D08 8 1; a 3,15 L 40 b M10 10 A0.5 0,5; a A0.7 0,7; a DU97.5 97,5 F1.0 1,0
Moisture, M Ash, A Mechanical durability, DU Fines at factory gate in bulk transport (at the time of loading) and in large sacks (at time of packing), F Fines in small bags at factory gate (at the time of packing), F Fines in small bags, up to 20 kg, when delivered to enduser, F Additives c Net calorific value, Q
F0.5 0,5
F0.5 0,5
F0.5 0,5
as received, MJ/kg or Q16.5 16,5 or Q16.5 16,5 or Q16.0 16,0 or kWh/kg Q4.6 4,6 Q4.6 4,6 Q4.4 4,4 3 Bulk density, BD kg/m BD600 600 BD600 600 BD600 600 Nitrogen, N w-% dry N0.3 0,3 N0.5 0,5 N1.0 1,0 Sulphur, S w-% dry S0.05 0,05 S0.05 0,05 S0.05 0,05 Chlorine, Cl w-% dry Cl0.02 0,02 Cl0.03 0,03 Cl0.03 0,03 Arsenic, As mg/kg dry 1 1 1 Cadmium, Cd mg/kg dry 0,5 0,5 0,5 Chromium, Cr mg/kg dry 10 10 10 Copper, Cu mg/kg dry 10 10 10 Lead, Pb mg/kg dry 10 10 10 Mercury, Hg mg/kg dry 0,1 0,1 0,1 Nickel, Ni mg/kg dry 10 10 10 Zinc, Zn mg/kg dry 100 100 100 d Ash melting behaviour, DT C DT1200 1200 DT1100 1100 DT1100 1100 a Select appropriate size and ash content of pellets. b Amount of pellets longer than 40 mm can be 5 w-%. Maximum length shall be < 45 mm. It is recommended that pellets used in stoves and small household appliances should have maximum length of 30 mm. c The maximum amount of additive is 2 w-% of pressing mass. Type (e.g. starch, corn flour, potato flour, vegetable oil) and the amount of additives shall be stated. d If appropriate, all characteristic temperatures can be stated.
Figure 11: Specifications of wood pellets for non-industrial use (prEN 14961-2 status July 2009)
Page 20
WIP / HFA
The product standard for wood pellets consists of three quality classes. For class A1pellets only stemwood and untreated by-products can be used as raw materials. For class A2 also materials with higher bark contents (e.g. residual wood) can be used. Class B allows for a broad range of raw materials including chemically treated wood by-products and used wood. The major differences between the three classes (ash, nitrogen and chlorine contents) are mainly a result of the broader raw material spectrum. Compared to existing standards and certification schemes, the new European standard in general does not demand a higher pellet quality. However, some changes (compared to NORM and DINplus) have to be considered: Requirements on pellet dimensions are now better defined. Instead of abrasion (in %), the European standard asks for the measurement of durability and introduces the fine content as an additional criterion. The abrasion threshold of 2.3 % is now changed to a durability of at least 97.5 %. Maximum sulphur contents are increased. The ash content is measured at 550 according to EN 14775 instead of 815 C C (NORM and DINplus). At 550 higher ash contents are measured. However, a C, maximum ash content of 0.5 % is demanded in both cases. This means that the European norm is stricter here. It is possible that there will be another change in the European norm. Thresholds for fines, ash melting behaviour and bulk density are newly introduced.
Part 6: Product standard for non-woody pellets (prEN 14961-6) By now, there is a first draft for this standard. It includes two tables, each similar to the table in prEN 14961-2 (wood pellets; Figure 11). The tables describe quality classes for: a) pellets produced from herbaceous biomass and b) pellets from fruit biomass and blends and mixtures. Each table contains specifications for three quality categories (A1, A2, B). The major differences are related to different raw material characteristics that make higher thresholds for ash (3-7 %), nitrogen (0.5-2 %), sulphur (0.1-0.3 %) and chlorine (0.10.4 %) necessary. Next steps The general part 1 of prEN 14961 was approved in September 2009 and will come into effect with the beginning of 2010. The product standards (incl. prEN 14961-2 for wood pellets) have been under internal commenting. Comments were discussed at the last meeting in Leipzig, Germany, in November 2009. Details on prEN 14961-2 on wood pellets will be further discussed and shall come into effect by the end of 2010. The product standard for non-wood pellets needs further coordination and will be published later.
Page 21
WIP / HFA
Page 22
WIP / HFA
ENplus certification
Raw material Production Storage Trader 1 Storage Trader 2 Final delivery Customer
Page 23
WIP / HFA
Details on the certification procedure, internal/external control and documentation modalities, costs and sanctions will be presented in a handbook. So far, the following features became apparent:15 As already mentioned, every actor along the supply chain has to be certified. The scheme is an international European certification system. Similar to prEN 14961-2, there are three quality classes: ENplus-A1, ENplus-A2 and EN-B; Pellet quality requirements are based on prEN 14961-2 with only one difference: Chemically treated material is not allowed in any quality class; Sustainability of pellet use shall be guaranteed by an obligatory minimum share of certified wood (PEFC or FSC) in pellet production. Quality management (at production plants, storage sites, and logistics providers) is important. The system foresees the setup of internal quality management with a quality representative, documentation and control. An identification system shall facilitate the traceability of pellet sources. Certified actors are obliged to document (see QM) and report on produced/marketed volumes on a monthly basis. The aim is to improve the monitoring of available volumes in the market and thus increase supply security. It is also discussed to include a minimum storage space as a precondition for certification. This might further increase supply security. External controls of production sites are performed once per year by testing institutes accredited according to ISO 17020 and ISO 17025. Additional controls are foreseen if necessary.
The system was presented to European pellet actors at the pellet industry forum in Stuttgart, October 2009. Until November 2009, details are discussed with European stakeholders. The certification process shall start in 2010.
15
Behr, H.M. (DEPV); Umsetzung der europischen Norm fr Holzpellets in Deutschland; 9. Industrieforum Pellets; October 2009, Stuttgart, Germany.
WIP / HFA
Page 24
8. Summary
Pellets@las data collections showed how inadequate the current status of pellet standardization and certification is in Europe. The existing national standards with individual quality requirements were not accepted by all stakeholders and did not spread within Europe. In most European countries, pellet quality standards are not used at all. Thus, national standards may have contributed to the development of single national pellet markets but the absence of common European standardisation was an important barrier to further development of the European pellet market in general and to increased international pellet trade in particular. It can be expected that this situation will improve greatly with the implementation of new European standards for solid biofuels, including pellets. The pellets@las consortium follows and supports the European standardisation process and directly contributes to the process: Pellets@las partner Holzforschung Austria is a member of CEN/TC 335 and pellets@las partner FORCE Technology is a member of the Danish mirror group. One experience gained during the pellets@las project was that standards alone are not sufficient to promote European pellet markets. The diversity of raw materials, the rapidly increasing number of producers and the critical importance of pellet quality for consumer satisfaction and therefore for market growth in general make the reinforcement and communication of compliance with standards necessary. In order to reinforce the compliance with quality standards, internal quality management needs to be accompanied by regular, external and unannounced controls at the production sites. Concerning communication, the end-consumer needs a reliable and recognisable quality label facilitating buying decisions. Quality labels also are an important marketing instrument for pellet producers. Finally, quality labels are used by pellet appliance manufacturers in warranty conditions that exclude the use of pellets without quality label. All this can be delivered by quality certification schemes that award a reliable and recognizable quality label following regular external controls. Therefore, already in 2007, pellets@las partners recommended to use prEN 14961 and prEN 15234 as a basis for a pan-European certification system that could be used across Europe and facilitate international pellet trade and market development. This recommendation will be followed by national certification bodies who decided to adapt their systems to the framework set by European standards. Two of these certification systems (NORM and DINplus) have reached a certain level of international acceptance in the past but none can be characterized as a European quality label. One barrier to the European usage of these national systems is that quality labels which are well known in their country of origin (DIN in Germany; NORM in Austria) may not be recognized and accepted in other countries. This led, for example, to efforts for replacing DINplus with the French NF label in France. Besides this, also language barriers and deficiencies in the certification process hinder the expansion of national certification systems. For DINplus this means that there is only one certification body (DIN CERTCO in Germany) without a representation or a sufficient number of control and testing organizations in other countries. Finally, existing certification systems are lacking close cooperation between certification bodies and the pellet industry. AIEL may manage its own system and ITEBE and SNPGB may have contributed to the setup of the French system but the
Page 25 WIP / HFA
risk of certification systems developing against markets needs remains as long as the pellet industry is not directly involved in the management of certification systems. Besides this, the pellet industry does not necessarily have to accept that profits with certification are made only outside the industry. Based upon these arguments the pellets@las consortium recommended developing a new European certification system, based upon new European standards and with the following characteristics: The system should have a clear European focus from the beginning. This means involving experts and associations from all European countries (or as many as possible). The involved national associations should serve as the managing authorities of the certification system in their countries. In addition, a European pellet association should be established, not only to serve as the managing authority on the European level, but also as a platform for the discussion of pan-European issues such as policy development, R&D strategies, trade facilitation, market monitoring, supply security and sustainability. A new pellet certification system should include sustainability criteria. A new system could also be used for market monitoring and securing supply security.
With ENplus, the German Pellet Industry Association (DEPV), together with the German Biomass Research Centre (DBFZ) and the pellets@las member proPellets Austria developed a new certification system that aims at combining the recommended features mentioned above. In October 2009, the system was presented to European actors at the pellet industry forum in Stuttgart and discussed with a number of other national pellet associations. In addition, first steps towards the formation of a European pellet industry association were taken. These measures will be followed and fully supported by the pellets@las consortium. Outlook The development of a new French certification system will certainly cause some competition for pellet producers with DINplus, which has already been used by French producers for some time. In the same way, ENplus will have to face the competition of all the existing certification schemes. Certification bodies such as DIN CERTCO (Germany) and FCBA/AFNOR (France) may not be willing to abandon already established or recently developed quality labels and to integrate in the new system. On the one hand, competition may be good for the certification business in general. On the other hand, it is also thinkable that there is only the need for one European quality label since pellet producers may have to decide between a trade mark that grants access to the pan-European market and trade marks that confine their activities to the respective national markets. Within this process, the European boiler/stove manufacturers play an important role. By recommending a certain quality label in their equipment quality conditions, they substantially influence consumers buying decisions and directly influence the pellet producers decision for a certain quality label.
Page 26 WIP / HFA