User reviews

Potential interesting premiss, but -like many modern TV-shows- killed by very annoying and bad cinematography. Why all the extreme close-ups and Parkinson like shots? Got motion sickness after watching the first episode. Good cinematography starts with letting the viewer NOT notice there's a camera at work.

We watched two episodes of Morten and then we had to quit. The dialogues were simply too predictable and the acting too clumsy. Lead character was OK-ish, but lacked the charisma of a credible party leader. Lower class accents sounded fake.

Acting is ok and the overall premise of the story could be really good. Not comparable to the excellent Dutch series Klem/Bloodpact, but not bad

But why they needed to add the ridiculous sub-plots , god knows .

The main story line is enough and it didn't need the "Euthanasia pill retirement home murder" story or the "Muslim son joins jihad movement "

There are plot-holes the size of a crater; and after episode 4 it becomes totally unbelievable/bordering laughably absurd .

I had to sit through to the end to see how this nonsense would wrap up; and I wasn't disappointed- the most ridiculous ending . Another 8 hours of my life I won't get back..