User reviews

Was it a blockbuster movie? No. Was it fun to take a trip down memory lane having worked in the movie theater when the first came out? Yes! It was fun to see the original cast and characters. And it was great that they brought back the original songs from the first movie too.

Say what you will about it being a money grab or whatever, but we enjoyed seeing Axel, Billy, Taggart, Jeffrey and Serge again! They're great characters that we grew old with.

And Kevin just makes for a great villain. He's got the smile and swagger. You knew right away he was the bad guy.

We recommend watching it for the nostalgia value at least.

This was a surreal experience watching a sequel to a 40 year old movie (less is you count the previous sequels). I was amazed at how m any of the original cast they were able to round up. After forty years I would have suspected many would have retired or passed away.

Eddie Murphy looks like he aged the least even though he's in his 60s now. The film itself is almost a tribute to the previous installments being very similar. You don't see films quite like this unless it is in the b-movie genre. Racing down a city street with abandon, destroying cars and property, no regard to by-standers. With guns fights galore and only the bad guys can miss. And no emotional repercussions for the good guys killing bad guys with abandon. If you want to relive an 1980's action film, this encapsulates it well.

Having seen the original in the movie theater this was like a time machine. I think the only thing that was really off putting was Eddie Murphy's character continual insinuation that his daughter had a sexual relationship with another character. This might have been funny back in the 80s but just doesn't work in this day and age.

Otherwise, welcome to the time machine.

Eddie Murphy is back as Axel Foley, 40 years after his first outing! Most of the original gang in fact is back - Taggart, Rosewood, an unrecognizable Jeffrey and Serge. I've seen BHC 1 & 2 countless times, I can quote them almost verbatim. The third was largely forgettable and a noticeable drop in quality so it was with some trepidation I heard that they were finally going to do a 4th installment. Eddie Murphy had repeatedly said over the years he'll only do it if the script is right but still, I always feared they would modernize it too much and miss the magic of the original.

I'm happy to report they got it mostly right! It was just fun getting to see the characters again on screen after so long. Eddie Murphy slips back into Axel with similar sass and recklessness we remember him as, albeit with a little bit of a softer edge. Judge Reinhold and John Ashton haven't done many (if any) projects in the last 20+ years and they're used sparingly but the scenes with the three of them together just ooze chemistry and if anything I'd have loved there to be more! The new additions to the cast do a solid job too: Kevin Bacon just never disappoints but again, the script could've used him more. Joseph Gordon Levitt does a good job as the straight cop who eventually gets swept up in Axel's plans. We also find Axel has a daughter, Jane, who he's estranged from - it's a bit run-of-the-mill and we don't get too much of a backstory but in truth it's not what this movie is about, that's more of a side-story that gives Axel a bit of an arc to have during the movie. It's not an overbearing part of the plot and it helps give the movie a little extra heart.

The soundtrack is very well done. It's got all the iconic themes and songs from the original that is just pure nostalgia and it plays such a crucial role in bringing the movie together.

Nostalgia was always going to be a big draw for this movie, especially with so much of original cast back. Many movies can get it wrong by being too heavy-handed with it, but here (like Top Gun Maverick) I found it to be spot on; enough to put a smile on your face when you spot the throwbacks, but woven seamlessly enough into the story that it doesn't feel forced.

They don't shy away from the fact that 40 years has passed, the style of movies (especially comedies) has changed for better or worse, but I think they did an admirable job in trying to make a 2024 action comedy feel like one from the 80s with enough refreshments so it doesn't just feel like a lazy copy yet keeps the charm of the original. It's a really delicate (nigh impossible) balance but they get much more right than wrong. It's quite a bit better than the 1994 third attempt (Joseph Gordon Levitt with a cheeky line in reference to it when he first meets Axel) and I'm glad we get to see the trio reunited one last time for some 80s shenanigans!

Axel is back!!! It was a pleasing film with the gang back again. The story was not complicated but fits the Beverly Hills Cop movies. The intro got you right back all those years ago. And how i have missed the humor of Eddie Murphy on the big screen. The film had the humor and action we came to love from the first films. Yes, it can never beat the original films but they were simply that good and the gang was ofcourse a lot younger. Taggert surprised me with a energetic performance for his respectable age! I was completey back in the Foley universe and enjoyed it! Thank you Eddie, good to see you again!

The film commences with Axel Foley, now a seasoned Detroit cop, in a high-octane chase through the city streets. The action sequences are well-executed, providing a refreshing contrast to the prevalent overuse of CGI in many of today's blockbusters. The narrative then transports us back to Beverly Hills, where Axel's estranged daughter Jane, portrayed by Taylour Paige, finds herself in peril due to her involvement in a case concerning corrupt cops. The reappearance of familiar characters like Billy Rosewood (Judge Reinhold) and John Taggart (John Ashton) adds a touch of nostalgia. New additions to the cast, including Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Kevin Bacon, infuse a fresh dynamic into the narrative.

This is more than just a legacy sequel; it's a testament to Eddie Murphy's enduring charm and comedic prowess. It's a film that doesn't shy away from addressing themes of aging and the treatment of veterans in law enforcement. While the film does indulge in its share of nostalgic callbacks, it manages to stand on its own merits. It surpasses the second and third films in the series, and it successfully encapsulates the spirit of the original while adapting to the expectations of a contemporary audience. In conclusion, "Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F" is a surprisingly entertaining film that successfully revives a beloved franchise. It's a film that will make you laugh, keep you on the edge of your seat, and perhaps even stir a bit of nostalgia. Whether you're a fan of the original films or new to the franchise,

It was a fun ride that had a lot of the original elements. Nothing new in terms of the plot but it was entertaining. It was nice to see most of the original cast show up throughout the film. Everyone is a lot older so don't expect a lot of physical action and fighting scenes, just a lot of bullets flying.

I said everyone is much older but the main start, Murphy, seriously doesn't look much older than he did in Beverly Hills Cop III. There's a scene with Eddie Murphy and Kevin Bacon in a room together. Bacon looks like the 65 year old OG he is but Murphy looks nowhere near his age of 63. 63! Let that sink in when you see him on screen. Unbelievable.

I really wasn't expecting much. The third movie was so bad, and this one straight to streaming, I figured it would be a disaster. But it wasn't! I think if they tried to update it too much and there wasn't as much nostalgia (music, familiar characters), it would've been a flop.

The story is ok, just not very strong. The action was ok, but it was a a lot of rehashing of the opening sequence of the first movie - plus, everyone is so much older now, there can't be as much running or rolling around on the floor. The humor throughout is decent, I wish there was more.

The weakest of it all is the actor who played Jane. Unfortunately, she's not very good in the emoting department - she's way worse than Brigitte Nielsen was in the second movie. Anyways, it's still a decent watch if one is a fan of the originals. It's good enough to have deserved a theatrical release. Not bad at all.

I was 18 when Beverly Hills Cop came out, (saw it at a drive in), here I am 40 years later, reconnecting with my youth. Same characters, same sound track it's absolutely fantastic. In all honesty I reckon outside of the original, this is the best. It was laugh out loud funny at times, I really struggle to watch a movie these days from start to finish, just jumped on this one and was crushed when it ended. A couple of classic scenes included the woman who played the unhinged real estate agent, just brilliant stuff, as well as the hideously underrated Luis Guzman completely dominating his three minutes as the supposed drug cartel Uncle of the wrongly convicted dogsbody. Really enjoyed this one.

I'm a sucker for a good nostalgia movie. Stallone did it with Rocky and Rambo, Ford with Indy, Han Solo and Deckard, Cruise with Maverick... now it's Eddie Murphy's turn with Axel F!

I thought the third movie had definitely killed off any hope of another but this definitely recaptures some of the magic of the original movie without going over the top to get a laugh, which is what I think was the problem with number three.

A great mix of action and comedy without going too far for the laughs. Great to see Taggart and Rosewood back together, with some great additional characters. Sime interesting cameo appearances too.

Nostalgia is a great thing when it happens, and it could be a new narrative or in this case, a new film in an old franchise. The '84 original was a time capsule of action/comedy perfection... and all you need to do is capture the pace and characters of the original formula, but with something new for a new audience and a returning one. I'll address 'the new' shortly...

It has a funny and fast paced opening, with all the language, chases and ridiculous decisions made by both the bad guys and police. You just gotta hang on to your seat hope the rest of the film plays out well... It doesn't really, unfortunately.

It doesn't try to be something new or inventive, it just goes for the gold and glory of the original concept and characters... But it just isn't funny enough or pushing the boundaries enough, or using Joseph Gordan Levitt as an actor enough... He IS a good actor, and he's not in the story enough here, strange... Oh, and the soundtrack rocks pretty well in some points...

But overall it just felt flat... again this is disappointing to state, but it just does...

What the hell! The story is very similar to the first movie, making it feel repetitive and uninspired. The movie seems cheap and lazy, lacking the polish and excitement of its predecessor. There was zero chemistry with Jane; her performance felt empty and devoid of any real emotion. I'm not sure what the casting department was thinking!? There were a couple of cringe-worthy moments that made me question the scriptwriting. Speaking of the script, it definitely needed way more work to be engaging and coherent. There were also issues with the sound that detracted from the overall experience. My wife even fell asleep watching it, which says a lot about the film's entertainment value. Overall, it was a disappointing sequel that failed to capture the magic of the original.

I thought this was nicely done. It seemed to me that they weren't trying to outdo, or even match the original movie, but were just giving it an affectionate nod. And it achieved just that. It's nowhere near as funny as the first one but anyone who knows that movie well will probably enjoy the many tributes to some of its best moments. It was great to see so many of the original cast and also a lot of the locations. Using the original music was also a nice touch and it helped to recreate the mood of the original movie. If you don't expect too much it's quite a fun watch. I bet they had a ball making it!

How can you get someone to play a lead role so bad, I'm obviously referring to Axel Foley's daughter, Jane. God, until the end he doesn't even show any acting skills, a total lack of empathy and even a lack of acting talent. With another person in her place, more talented, the film would have looked better. But unfortunately, no, Eddie Murphy can't do the whole movie by himself. I noticed her throughout the movie, nothing. It started badly and ended badly, all mechanical. If the producers will think to make a 5th part, I hope they will think carefully. I think it should have been done a little earlier, the difference from the last film produced is obvious, like in the Bad Boys series. Too bad it could be better.

I was extremely skeptical when I saw the trailer for this and heard it was going to be a Netflix released but ended up pleasantly surprised.

It manages to use all the tricks in the old boxes and does it well enough. We have the classic vigilante cop, the classic villian, classic sergeant, the classic side characters (which was one of my favorite aspects), classic cinemtic shots and we of course have a bit of drama as well although I'd argue it was not really up to par with the rest. The film manages to tick in all the boxes you'd expect from a 80's Beverly Hills film and somehow manages to be "inclusive" without it feeling too forced like most of modern media.

Eddie still manages to make people laugh and the pacing of the film is great once the setting had been established.

Is it a masterpiece? No, but neither were the classics and the writing is definitely good enough for it to fit in with the classics and they managed to integrate the old characters as well who I thought did a great job.

This film easily deserves it place in the franchise which is rare to say about modern versions of classic franchises.

It's honestly a big shame this didn't get to debut on the silver screen and instead getting released straight into peoples living rooms and smartphones. That's probably worst part about this film.

If you are a fan of the classics you are likely to find they did alot of the old stuff really well here.

Too many friggin characters! And of course they had to throw in the domestic disputes of father and daughter, to spark that drama every one seems to crave these days, instead of just having FUN! Movies think they are reality now and that is why they suck. Movies were made to ESCAPE reality. And there are certain genres to watch if you want that but it does not belong in this franchise. Foley does not need an estranged daughter weighing him down. Who in the world do you think wants an annoying character entering your space and taking all of your attention away from your friend? It is a dumb move. But films continue to do this crap, like Indiana Jones.

Also, they do not even attempt to explain who Kevin Bacon is as the bad guy. He, like all other known faces, are just planted in the story for familiarity instead of story. And this is why this movie fails. It made me actually miss part 3, which has grown on me over the last 2 decades. Bacon is the best part about this movie and they give him NOTHING to work with. He is so underused so they can make room for father/daughter, boyfriend/girlfriend crap. This isn't a teeny pop movie. It's an ACTION comedy. Filmmakers really gotta start stepping up their game!

Also, the director of his had zero clue what they were going for. It seems he has never even seen parts 1-3, from the vibe and atmosphere of this one. I'm just tired of filmmakers and actors phoning in their duties now. It has become just another job instead of a passion and that's sad.

Movie needed more serious bonding between the old characters that moved the story, instead of just having them appear for fan-service and be useless. Serge especially had a small and forgettable part when they could have used him as part of the team this time. But instead of progress the characters we want they toss new boring ones down our throats. Hollywood is so far removed from what we want that it is becoming laughable.

It is still a fine movie to sit through. It is not boring but it just isn't BEVERLY HILLS COP.

In the long-awaited fourth installment of the Eddie Murphy series, "Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F," the iconic Axel Foley returns to the screen after a 30-year hiatus.

Plot Summary: Axel Foley, now older and not wiser, finds himself drawn back to Beverly Hills when his estranged daughter, Jane, gets entangled in a case involving corrupt cops. Along the way, familiar faces like Billy Rosewood and John Taggart reappear, adding to the nostalgic charm.

Eddie Murphy Shines: Murphy's performance is a highlight, and he looks great. His comic timing remains impeccable, and he's supported by talented actors like Taylour Paige, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Kevin Bacon. The chemistry between them keeps the film engaging.

Action Scenes and Nostalgia: "Axel F" delivers well-staged chase scenes reminiscent of classic action films. While some callbacks to the original trilogy fall flat, the overall buoyant and playful tone sets it apart from typical legacy sequels.

Father-Daughter Subplot: The subplot involving Axel's daughter adds depth and emotion. It's a meaningful exploration of family dynamics amidst the chaos of crime-solving.

Rating: 9/10 Despite a somewhat predictable plot, "Axel F" successfully captures the spirit of the original films. Eddie Murphy's return as Axel Foley is a welcome blast from the past. So, if you're up for a dose of nostalgia and action, grab your popcorn and stream it on Netflix.

They've redeemed themselves for 3. This is a proper sequel with nods to the original and some Stallone jokes. I did enjoy watching this. Serge as always is hilarious with Axel. We don't mention 3. It goes Beverly Hills 1,2, and Axel F.

Kevin Bacon always makes a good addition to any movie. Paul Reiser is back. I'm not sure what the backstory of how Axel had a daughter as they didn't really touch on that.

This is like Coming To America 2. It's not as good as the original, but it has great nostalgic references. They hit all the excellent soundtrack form the originals. No banana in the tailpipe this time. Fun movie.

It's just an OK movie. It's got nostalgia memories from back in the day which we all love to a degree - but the film itself (without trying to ruin it too much) it's pretty generic. It's your basic ageing cop movie struggles with family issues because obviously "the job" still doing the same things from 20/30 years ago because Axel is a rebel. The new characters are modern professionals ready to remind Axel how old he is and how much things have changed over the years. It's good enough. It's nowhere near 1 and 2. I don't think it's a 6.7 out of 10. This movie is basically Top Gun Maverick - but Axel Foley.

This should be paying theaters right now. In an era where the theatrically-released comedy, especially the R-rated theatrically-released comedy has gone the way of the Stegosaurus, this would play so hot inside a movie theater right here and now.

This movie.

This time of year.

In the theater.

There would be no Bad Boys: Ride or Die, if there was never a Beverly Hills Cop.

Has it been 40 years?

Are we that old?

Eddie Murphy looks the same.

And this movie does it right.

Nice shoutout to Detroit to start.

Plenty of homages to the original in the way of the music, scenes and characters in this one and it is fun to watch!

This is a fun movie!

Foley fits perfectly in 2024.

He makes the world work around him.

His ways are the same.

Striking similarities to Top Gun: Maverick.

A high compliment.

Next generation actors join the action.

And a 1984 legend joins in as well.

Kevin Bacon.

Like I said.

It's a blast.

See for yourself.

This has everything you want.

And you ain't even got to go to the theater to see it!

This is 2024! It ain't 1984!

Unfortunately.

So get to your nearest sofa and enjoy for yourself!

Just finished watching Axel F.. had nice nostalgia... Movie seemed a BIT too long ..but I didn't mind cause I love BHC movies ..idk if it's because I love Eddie or it's his acting but he didn't ruin the original... I can really see a part 2.

Comedy: 7.6/10 Storyline: solid 6.7 Nostalgia: 7.7

I do really think after watching this they can make a run at a part 2 and even 3. Maybe just pump up the comedy a bit ... Maybe a bit more... Relevant in today's era and pay a bit more attention to detail. Reddit definitely has not changed though. You know how some actors coming back to reprise a role can be a bit outdated and corny... Reddit didn't do that here.

Overall: 7.6.

Story is the usual stuff we've seen a million times.

1. Since this is a highly anticipated, long awaited sequel, gotta include as many characters from the older movies for nostalgia, even if they serve little to no purpose at all. Oh look, they even shoehorned Serge. Again...Yay.

2. Also have to include the son or daughter of the main character so they can whine about family problems that slow the pacing to a crawl, (in addition- lead actress is terrible). But don't worry, I'm sure by the end of the movie axel and his daughter will magically bond.

3. A director with zero previous movie experience. Action scenes aren't fun to watch, characters are zoomed in and it's shot over the shoulder like a soap opera. I wish we would get people actually qualified for the job and with some talent that stands out instead of someone that's hired just to do the job with cookie cutter results and no passion for the art of filmmaking.

4. Kevin Bacon. He's a great actor but c'mon man we all know what role he plays even from the very first trailer.

5. Eddie Murphy is constantly spouting out one liners and overall the comedy is flat and far, far away from the original film and even the sequel.

6. Scenes that are obviously setup for Eddie to go into his skits of "acting like someone else and hey look it's SO funny isn't it?!?!?!?".

This was a bit of a return to form for Murphy, who's been bottled up for most of the past 25 years in over the top outlandish characters.

The cinematography and music were first class and it had the look and feel and tone of the first two films, which is really mostly what I was hoping for. It was a bit silly at times, but thankfully those moments were largely contained.

The movie was leaps and bounds better than BHC3, but lags a little behind the first two. Nonetheless, it was better than I was expecting and is a solid entry in the series. I heard there may now be a BHC5. If there is, I hope it follows in this formula.

It's a really fun film to watch, banks on nostalgia but takes the story forward in a new way, with his daughter as a Beverly Hills lawyer.

I saw both the first and second ones (but not the third) - this one takes after the first two.

The music brings back memories as they use some of the same tracks in this movie.

It has similarities in story form to the first to films, being a bit formulaic, but this is not a bad thing.

The film has former characters, like Judge Reinhold - but also welcomes new faces with Joseph Gordon Levitt and Kevin Bacon, who are both great.

Highly recommend it, is light and fun, and is a classic summer blockbuster!