Currently in vogue fast track construction has encouraged the adoption of pre-tension technology for urban flyovers. After having successfully experimented pretensioned spans for River Bridge upto span of 30 m in Hadakiya Bridge in...
moreCurrently in vogue fast track construction has encouraged the adoption of pre-tension technology for urban flyovers. After having successfully experimented pretensioned spans for River Bridge upto span of 30 m in Hadakiya Bridge in Gujarat, the technology was first time extended upto 35m spans for Beas and Sutlej river bridges in Punjab. The inherent peculiarities such as single stage prestressing, transfer of prestress through bond between concrete and cables by obviation of grouting and sheathing ducts, tensioning of tendons before the concrete is cast and transfer of prestress after the attainment of required strength in concrete derive certain advantages in favour of pretensioning in terms of durability, quantity reduction, construction speed, design and construction expediency. However, in the Indian scenario there are no codal guidelines accounting for these peculiarities for bridges. The enumeration with illustration is intended to provide basis for formulating guidelines for pretensioning in bridge building. The Paper also deliberates on optimization of beam cross section in relation to lateral stability during transfer of prestress accounting for casting imperfections, handling and erection of beams before the beams are transversly stiffened by deck slab which may help the code makers to have fresh look on the guidelines for lateral stability of the prestressed beams. The project consisted of design and construction of high-level bridge across the river Sutlej including approaches and guide-bunds connecting Nakodar and Jagraon. The construction of the bridge facilitates in reduction of the distance between the towns by 50 km, reduction in traffic of NH-1 due to traffic from Rajkot, Maler Kotla and Jalandar and reduction of traffic in the city of Ludhiana. The bridge proper, 810 m long between the inner faces of dirt walls is made up of 23 spans of 35.20 m, while the approaches of lengths 1369 m and 1115 m on Nakodar side and Jagraon side respectively flanked the bridge proper. The main flow is confined and guided through the bridge linear waterway without causing damage to the bridge and its approaches by provision of divergent guide-bunds along the river flow, upstream and downstream on both the banks. The superstructure of 35.20 m span bridge consisted of 6-nos. precast pretensioned concrete beams spaced at 2.15 m centres and cast-in-situ RCC deck slab. The width of the carriageway has been kept 7.50 m flanked either side by 2 m wide cycle track making the total width of the bridge deck to be 12.95 m including crash barriers and steel railings. The vehicular way is separated from cycle ways by crash barriers while cyclists are protected by steel railings from being toppled over. The beams were simply supported on POT-cum-PTFE bearings having slab steel expansion joints between the spans. The abutments were solid non spill-through types to go with same family of plate type piers flaring towards pier cap in the direction of river flow (transverse) to minimise the size of the RCC cap. The piers were founded on 6 m dia well foundations while the abutments were resting on 7 m dia wells. The detail of the general features of the bridge is given in Fig. 1. 2. DETAILS OF THE CONTRACT Punjab Infrastructure Development Board, on behalf of Punjab PWD provided developmental outline proposal with the condition that the contractor should submit his own proposal with the approximate dimensions of various components of the bridge structure to fairly establish that the technical requirement were met with. The tender proposal of the contractors were to include certain obligatory conditions such as length of the bridge, approaches and guide-bunds, carriageway and cycle track width requirements, linear water way and vertical clearance and type of foundations, and formation levels. The departmental outline proposal had the span of 40.50 m and the variation in span length was permitted up to ±20 per cent. The contractor had to give detailed design calculations and drawings in support of his proposal after the award of the work to comply with the design requirements stipulated in tender documents. Qualified engineers supplemented by independent quality control consultant in line with ISO requirements were supervising the execution of the job. Some of the salient design parameters specified in the tender documents are as below: River hydraulics