Anatolian Metalwork Hoards (Essays on Metal Production and Cultural Contexts) L.I. Avilova Summary Importance of metal for development of cultural and social processes in ancient times is difficult to overestimate. Historical...
moreAnatolian Metalwork Hoards
(Essays on Metal Production and Cultural Contexts)
L.I. Avilova
Summary
Importance of metal for development of cultural and social processes in ancient times is difficult to overestimate. Historical metallurgical studies provide an opportunity to raise and address issues of early metallurgy and metalworking development, spread of technological innovations and other advances, describe factors which determined readiness of society to adopt technical and cultural innovations.
This book deals with a specific group of archaeological collections of materials, i.e. metalwork hoards from Anatolia (Fig. 1). A hoard is perceived as a deposit which stores information on morphological, production and social standards of a prehistoric society. Changes over time in production and use of metals in the region stretching over a long period from the Chalcolithic to the Late Bronze Age (late fifth-early fourth – second millennia BC) can be traced by analyzing the contents of the hoards. This study relies on a database which includes 31 hoards (almost 32,000 finds) and 115 spectral analyses of copper and bronze items.
Chapter 1 describes contemporary trends in historical metallurgical studies. A particular emphasis is put on the phenomenon of the earliest metal objects because Anatolia forms part of the region where metal production first emerged (ninth –seventh millennia BC). In author’s view, production of the earliest metal items pursued the aim of creating symbols marking a special status of socially stratified groups or individuals rather than making utilitarian tools. Such artifacts reflect the beginning of social stratification; and only much later improved access to metal changed the social status of metal items turning them from prestige and religious cult items to utilitarian tools.
The analysis is based on the historical metallurgical periodization developed by a group of researchers collaborating with the Laboratory of Science Methods of the Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences, (Chernykh, 1992; Chernykh, Avilova, Orlovskaya, 2002). This periodization is based on major production shifts and as such is less detailed compared to the regional systems of traditional relative chronology of the Mesopotamian and Anatolian Regions though it is consistent with them (Table 1). The absolute chronology is based on calibrated radiocarbon dates.
Regarding the methodology (Chapter 3), the author proceeds from the need to review specific features of the Anatolian region against the background of a broad objective historical and cultural phenomenon, i.e. emergence and development of the Near-Eastern type of the earliest civilizations.
Chapter 4 explores materials of the Anatolian hoards, the context of their discovery, its reliability, and the contents of the associations.
Chapter 5 discusses mineral resources used by the population of ancient Anatolia and general issues of Anatolian metallurgy development. Heterogeneity of the chemical composition of metals and alloys also noted for the hoards in question is connected to characterization and localization of mineral deposits, routes of metal delivery to consumers, forms of trade or exchange, etc. A lot of attention is paid to tin sources, i.e. an issue which is still pending. Different opinions are presented.
The contents of hoard associations include items used by the rulers of city-states as symbols of power, prestige objects that probably circulated in the system of gift exchange, the implication is that they were linked to noneconomic relations. In certain situations hoards could also be treated as a treasure, a stock of values. These hoards are a vivid representation of types of finds such as semi-finished goods, ingots and scrap (Peyronel, 2010) that indicate the presence of highly developed crafts and exchange.
Chapter 6 analyzes ingots and blanks found in a number of hoards as well as broader issues that help single out commodity forms of metal and describe their characteristics, likely typological standards, weight characteristics which correspond or are similar to main weighing systems of the Near East and Ancient Egypt. Data are provided on the spread of the Near Eastern weighing systems outside the studied region, for example, among steppe stock-breeding mobile communities in the northern part of the Circumpontic Region (Lebedi and Malaya Ternovka kurgan cemeteries in South Russia, III mill. BC).
Various types of ingots and blanks (small shapeless ones and those in the form of semi-finished good of a standard form, size and weight) were used in circulation of metals. Standardized objects of the simplest forms (rods, rings, wire sections) suited the purposes of transportation, exchange transactions based on weighing and were possibly used as early equivalents of value.
Apparently, when Anatolia reached the peak in its development in the third millennium BC, an extensive network of trade routes which covered entire Anatolia and connected the central regions with the Northwest, the western coastline and Agais emerged (Şahoglu, 2005). The process of standardizing sets of item types and metals first signs of which can be traced in the hoards dating to the late third millennium BC – Tarsus room 56 and Soli – was completed. The LBA hoards mostly consist of tools and weapons; jewelry and precious metals are practically absent. Few analyses of metal composition from that period demonstrate that production was based primarily on tin bronze. The LBA hoards evidence that energy of society was rechanneled from the ideological realm towards practical application of metal as weaponry and trade objects. It is not incidental that standardized types of tools and weapon dominate in later hoards (Ordu). Discovered series of large ingots intended for sale suggest developed trade in metal. LBA materials (such as Uluburun shipwreck remains, Pulak, 2008) evidence commercial production of metal and extensive trade in metal. Heavy metal bars known as ox-hide ingots) the weight of which is multiple of the talent, the biggest weight unit of antiquity, is a characteristic trait of this stage of metal production and circulation.
Development of the exchange of valuables, especially, metal, encouraged spread of Near Eastern weighing systems to far-flung regions, including the North Pontic Region. A group of archaeological finds classified functionally as balance weights is related with the system of trade and exchange relations of the Bronze Age (Авилова, Гей, 2016). Comparison of materials from the Near East and the North Pontic Region provides an opportunity to give an affirmative answer to the question concerning existence and nature of long-distance trade links between these regions and the scale of using the Near Eastern weighing systems in the third millennium BC.
Studies of the role and the place of metal in ancient societies raise broad issues of cultural and social development, and reconstruct functional models of the earliest social organizations. The progress in metal production was one of the most powerful drivers of economic and social development of Near Eastern society in the Late Chalcolithic and the Bronze Age. The research of production and use of metals is closely associated with the issues related to formation of the early states and the reflection of these processes in archaeological materials. Metal items used as prestige objects that the social elite was so much interested in acquiring played an important role in the evolution of society from the egalitarian stage to the hierarchical stage.
Chapter 7 talks about the Balkan type of ring-shaped pendants found in Anatolia and bronze axes of Anatolian types known from Thrace. These finds used as specific types of markers confirm existence of cultural contracts that occurred at the intersection of the Anatolian and Balkan cultures in the Chalcolithic – Bronze Age. To get a better understanding of specific traits of Anatolia social and economic development, some characteristics of the Anatolian Region can be compared with those of the Balkans.
Anatolian metal production emerged locally and was linked to the model of Near Eastern society development: from rural settlements to a rank society with early urban centers and state formations. This development trajectory is typical for Southern, Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia which formed part of Syro-Mesopotamian civilization. The early urban stage and the early state stage of its development are marked by existence of the elite which organized production and exchange and consumed prestige objects (Авилова, 2009).
The theme of design features of wheeled transport in the Irano-Mesopotamian Region is discussed in a separate annex. This theme is not related directly to hoards and early metallurgy; however, it is relevant to various aspects of progressive development of technological traditions, communications, trade routes, evolution of societies from the late prehistoric rank societies to the earliest urban and state hierarchic systems.
This book presents the author’s understanding of some aspects of metal production and its function in ancient society, since its products became a vivid symbol of high social status, provided ideological justification of the elite power, reflected transformation of societies, emergence and development of the early civilizations.