Intensive Care Physiotherapy

objective was described the most important topics on the physical therapy during mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Systematic review of the published literature and gradation of the studies in levels of evidence, using the key words: mechanical ventilation and physical therapy. RESULTS: Recommendations on the most important techniques applied during mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapy has a central role at the Intensive Care environment, mainly in patients submitted to a mechanical ventilatory support invasive or non invasive.

objective was described the most important topics on the physical therapy during mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Systematic review of the published literature and gradation of the studies in levels of evidence, using the key words: mechanical ventilation and physical therapy. RESULTS: Recommendations on the most important techniques applied during mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapy has a central role at the Intensive Care environment, mainly in patients submitted to a mechanical ventilatory support invasive or non invasive.

Question: Is ventilator-induced hyperinflation in sidelying more effective than sidelying alone in removing secretions and improving respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection? Design: Randomised crossover trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: 30 mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection in an adult intensive care unit. Intervention: The experimental intervention was 30 minutes of ventilator-induced hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation in sidelying; the control intervention was 30 minutes of sidelying. Participants received both interventions on the same day, with a five-hour washout period between them. Outcome measures: Secretion clearance was measured as sputum volume retrieved during the intervention. Respiratory mechanics were measured as static compliance and total resistance of the respiratory system before and after the intervention. Results: The experimental intervention cleared 1.3 ml (95% CI 0.5 to 2.2) more secretions than the control. After ventilator-induced hyperinflation in sidelying, respiratory compliance had increased 4.7 ml/cmH 2 O (95% CI 2.6 to 6.8) more than in sidelying alone. There was no difference in total resistance of the respiratory system between the interventions (mean difference 0.3 cmH 2 O/l/s, 95% CI -0.8 to 1.3). Conclusion: The application of hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection improves secretion clearance and increases static compliance of the respiratory system. [Lemes DA, Zin WA, Guimarães FS (2009) Hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation improves secretion clearance and respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection: a randomised crossover trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 55: 249-254]

The II Brazilian Consensus Conference on Mechanical Ventilation was published in 2000. Knowledge on the field of mechanical ventilation evolved rapidly since then, with the publication of numerous clinical studies with potential impact on the ventilatory management of critically ill patients. Moreover, the evolving concept of evidence - based medicine determined the grading of clinical recommendations according to the methodological value of the studies on which they are based. This explicit approach has broadened the understanding and adoption of clinical recommendations. For these reasons, AMIB - Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira and SBPT - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia - decided to update the recommendations of the II Brazilian Consensus. Physical therapy during mechanical ventilation has been one of the updated topics. This objective was described the most important topics on the physical therapy during mechanical ventilation. Systematic review of th...

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Em 2000, foi publicado o II Consenso Brasileiro de Ventilação Mecânica. Desde então, o conhecimento na área da ventilação mecânica avançou rapidamente, com a publicação de inúmeros estudos clínicos que acrescentaram importantes informações para o manuseio de pacientes críticos em ventilação artificial. Além disso, a expansão do conceito de Medicina Baseada em Evidências determinou a hierarquização das recomendações clínicas, segundo o rigor metodológico dos estudos que as embasaram. Essa abordagem explícita vem ampliando a compreensão e a aplicação das recomendações clínicas. Por esses motivos, a AMIB – Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira – e a SBPT – Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia – julgaram conveniente a atualização das recomendações descritas no Consenso anterior. Dentre os tópicos selecionados a Fisioterapia durante a Ventilação Mecânica foi um dos temas propostos. O objetivo foi descrever os pontos mais importantes relacionados à atuação do fisioterapeuta no ambiente da terapia Intensiva com ênfase na ventilação mecânica. MÉTODO: Objetivou-se chegar a um documento suficientemente sintético, que refletisse a melhor evidência disponível na literatura. A revisão bibliográfica baseou-se na busca de estudos através de palavras-chave e em sua gradação conforme níveis de evidência. As palavras-chave utilizadas para a busca foram: mechanical ventilation e physical therapy. RESULTADOS: São apresentadas recomendações quanto aos principais procedimentos fisioterápicos, as técnicas e suas aplicações. CONCLUSÕES: A fisioterapia ocupa hoje papel relevante no ambiente da terapia intensiva, principalmente para os pacientes sob ventilação mecânica invasiva ou não invasiva.

BACKGROUND: Although mechanical ventilation is necessary for treating acute respiratory insufficiency, it may be associated with deconditioning and respiratory muscle dysfunction. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) evaluation is used to estimate inspiratory muscle strength in artificially ventilated patients, but there is no definition as to the best way to make this measurement. OBJECTIVE: To compare two methods for MIP evaluation, using four different protocols, among non-cooperative artificially ventilated patients. METHOD: Thirty non-cooperative patients undergoing the process of weaning off mechanical ventilation were evaluated. In accordance with block randomization, the simple occlusion method (OM) or the unidirectional valve method (UV) was applied to each patient for time periods of 20 and 40 seconds. Additionally, during the 40s measurements, the MIP value at 30s was recorded. RESULTS: The MIP values were higher at 40s than at 20s, both from OM (48.2 ± 21.7 vs. 36 ± 18.7 cmH2O; p< 0.001) and from UV (56.6 ± 23.3 vs. 43.4 ± 24 cmH2O; p< 0.001). The MIP values were higher from UV at 40s (UV40) than from OM at 40s (OM40) (56.6 ± 23.3 vs. 48.2 ± 21.7 cmH2O; p< 0.001). There was a difference between UV at 30 and 40s (51.5 ± 20.8 vs. 56.6 ± 23.3 cmH2O; p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among non-cooperative patients, higher MIP values were obtained from the unidirectional valve method with 40s of occlusion than from the other protocols evaluated.