Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2013, Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
…
3 pages
1 file
Reiki is a form of energy therapy in which the therapist, with or without light touch, is believed to access universal energy sources that can strengthen the body's ability to heal itself, reduce inflammation, and relieve pain and stress. There is currently no licensing for Reiki nor, given its apparent low risk, is there likely to be. Reiki appears to be generally safe, and serious adverse effects have not been reported. So in this article provides coverage of how to use Reiki in oncology services.
Objective: To evaluate patient-perceived benefits from receiving Reiki at a cancer infusion center. Methods: During a 6-month period, adults at a university hospital receiving Reiki through volunteer services were invited to complete a survey asking about perceived changes after Reiki. Changes in pain, mood, distress, sleep, and appetite were rated on a 5-point scale from no benefit to great benefit. Surveys were distributed after completing treatment and were returned in postage-paid envelops. Results: A total of 145 surveys were completed (34.5% response rate), with 47 participants seen in the cancer infusion center and 98 in other areas of the hospital. Reiki was rated as a positive experience by 94% at the cancer center and 93% of others, with 92% at the cancer center and 86% of others interested in receiving additional Reiki sessions. Symptomatic improvement was similar for people at the cancer center and others, respectively, with much to great improvement for 89% and 86% for relaxation, 75% and 75% for anxiety/worry, 81% and 78% for improved mood, 43% and 35% for improved sleep, 45% and 49% for reduced pain, 38% and 43% for reduced isolation/loneliness, 75% and 63% for improved attitude, and 30% and 30% for improved appetite. Response was unaffected by previous exposure to Reiki, massage, or other touch therapy. Conclusion: Reiki results in a broad range of symptomatic benefits, including improvements in common cancer-related symptoms.
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, 2012
Reiki is a system of natural healing techniques administered by laying of hands and transferring energy from the Reiki practitioner to the recipient. We investigated the role of Reiki in the management of anxiety, pain and global wellness in cancer patients. Building on the results of a pilot project conducted between 2003 and 2005 by a volunteer association at our
Advances in mind-body medicine, 2007
James S. Gordon, MD, is the founder and director of The Center for Mind-Body Medicine in Washington, DC. A graduate of Harvard Medical School, Dr Gordon is a clinical professor in the departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine at the Georgetown University School of Medicine and the former Chairman of the White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy. For 10 years, Dr Gordon was a research psychiatrist at the National Institute of Mental Health, where he developed the first national program for runaway and homeless youth, directed the Special Study on Alternative Services for President Carter's Commission on Mental Health, and created a nationwide preceptorship program for medical students. At The Center for Mind-Body Medicine, Dr Gordon created a mind-body skills program for physicians, medical students, and other healthcare professionals and for people with cancer, depression, and other chronic illnesses. Through the Center's Healing the Wounds ...
The purpose of this pilot study was to explore whether individualized Reiki given to cancer patients at a Brazilian hospital improved symptoms and well-being. Data from 36 patients who received 5 Reiki sessions were collected using the MYMOP and were compared before and after their treatment and also with 14 patients who did not receive Reiki and who acted as a comparison group. Twenty-one patients reported feeling better, 12 felt worse, and 3 reported no change. Of the comparison group, 6 patients reported feeling better and 8 felt worse. The Reiki practice delivered as part of the integrative care in oncology did produce clinically significant effects, although not statistically significant results, for more than half of the patients undergoing cancer treatment. KEY WORDS: complementary and alternative medicine, integrative medicine, integrative oncology, neoplasms, oncology, Reiki
Objective. This mixed methods study sought to evaluate the outcomes of an integrative Reiki volunteer program in an academic medical oncology center setting. Method. We used de-identified program evaluation data to perform both quantitative and qualitative analyses of participants' experiences of Reiki sessions. The quantitative data were collected pre-and postsession using a modified version of the distress thermometer. The pre-and postsession data from the distress assessment were analyzed using a paired Student's t test. The qualitative data were derived from written responses to open-ended questions asked after each Reiki session and were analyzed for key words and recurring themes. Results. Of the 213 pre-post surveys of first-time sessions in the evaluation period, we observed a more than 50% decrease in self-reported distress (from 3.80 to 1.55), anxiety (from 4.05 to 1.44), depression (from 2.54 to 1.10), pain (from 2.58 to 1.21), and fatigue (from 4.80 to 2.30) with P < .001 for all. Using conservative estimates that treat missing data as not endorsing Reiki, we found 176 (82.6%) of participants liked the Reiki session, 176 (82.6%) found the Reiki session helpful, 157 (73.7%) plan to continue using Reiki, and 175 (82.2%) would recommend Reiki to others. Qualitative analyses found that individuals reported that Reiki induced relaxation and enhanced spiritual well-being. Conclusions. An integrative Reiki volunteer program shows promise as a component of supportive care for cancer patients. More research is needed to evaluate and understand the impact that Reiki may have for patients, caregivers, and staff whose lives have been affected by cancer.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2003
This trial compared pain, quality of life, and analgesic use in a sample of patients with cancer pain (n ϭ 24) who received either standard opioid management plus rest (Arm A) or standard opioid management plus Reiki (Arm B). Participants either rested for 1.5 hr on Days 1 and 4 or received two Reiki treatments (Days 1 and 4) one hour after their first afternoon analgesic dose. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain ratings, blood pressure, heart rate, and respirations were obtained before and after each treatment/rest period. Analgesic use and VAS pain scores were reported for 7 days. Quality of life was assessed on Days 1 and 7. Participants in Arm B experienced improved pain control on Days 1 and 4 following treatment, compared to Arm A, and improved quality of life, but no overall reduction in opioid use. Future research will determine the extent to which the benefits attributed to Reiki in this study may have been due to touch. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003;26:990-997. Ć 2003 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2015
Background: Fatigue, stress and pain are common symptoms among cancer patients, affecting the quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of distant Reiki on pain, anxiety and fatigue in oncology patients. Materials and Methods: Participants in the control group received usual medical and nursing care during their stay. The intervention group received usual care plus five distant Reiki sessions, one each night for 30 min. A face to face interview was performed and patient personal and illness related characteristics were evaluated using the Patient Characteristics form. Pain, stress and fatigue were evaluated according to a numeric rating scale. Results: The experimental group was predominantly composed of women (71.4%), married individuals (40%), and primary school graduates (40%). The control group was predominantly male (72.7%), married (60%), and primary school graduates (60%). The control group demonstrated greater levels of pain (p=0.002), stress (p=0.001) and fatigue (p=0.001). The Reiki group pain score (p <0.0001), stress score (p <0.001) and fatigue score were also significantly lower. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that Reiki may decreasepain, anxiety and fatigue in oncology patients
International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 2016
Aims: To explore the perceptions and experiences of Reiki for women who have cancer and identify outcome measures for an intervention study. Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study of 10 women who had received Reiki after cancer treatment was conducted. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and coded using Framework Analysis. Results: Key themes identified were: limited understanding of Reiki prior to receiving any Reiki release of emotional strain during Reiki-feelings of a release of energy, a clearing of the mind from cancer, inner peace/relaxation, hope, a sense of being cared for experience of physical sensations during Reiki, such as pain relief and tingling physical, emotional and cognitive improvements after Reiki, such as improved sleep, a sense of calm and peace, reduced depression and improved self-confidence Conclusion: Findings suggest that Reiki could be a beneficial tool in the self-management of quality of life issues for women with cancer.
Global Journal of Management And Business …, 2012
isara solutions, 2021
Introducción a los Estudios Poscoloniales, Subalternos y Descoloniales, 2022
Contaduría Universidad de Antioquia
Богословські роздуми: Східноєвропейський журнал богослов’я, 2024
Brazilian Journal of Health Review
Rivista Italiana di musicologia, 2021
The Journal of clinical investigation, 2018
Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2021
BMC Medical Education
Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2020
2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2018
American Journal of Science and Learning for Development (ISSN 2835-2157), 2023