International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Development
Vol.1, No.1, April 2013, ISSN 2337-3180(Online)
©Universitas Bandar Lampung 2013
Rapid Prototyping and Evaluation for Green Manufacturing
Afzeri Tamsir#1,#2, Rudi Irawan#3,#2 and Riza Muhida#1,#2,
#1
Department of Informatics and Computer, Surya College of Education (STKIP Surya)
Jl. Scientia Boulevard, Blok U/7, Surya Research and Education Centre, Tangerang Selatan 15810, Indonesia
[email protected]
#2
International Institute for Clean Energy and Climate Change (IICECC)
SURE Center, Jl. Scientia Boulevard, Blok U/7, SummareconGadingSerpong, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
[email protected]
#3
Department of Physics, Surya College of Education (STKIP Surya)
Jl. Scientia Boulevard, Blok U/7, Surya Research and Education Centre, Tangerang Selatan 15810, Indonesia
(Received Mei 2012, Accepted August 2012)
Abstract—With global awareness of environmental risk and
the pressing needs to improve efficiency, manufacturing
systems are growing into new concept. Green manufacturing
is reflected to employ various green strategies and technique
to produce with eco-efficient. Green manufacturing aspects
on the machine level were studied in various machining
process. On this paper presentsthe green manufacturing
review of Rapid Prototyping process. The objective is to
evaluate the factors involved in green process of RP.Several
comparative RP process respect to green manufacturing
criteria are described.
Rapid Prototyping process uses three dimensional CAD files
to fabricate a physical model. Models are usually made from
variety of material such as ABS, rubber and specific metals.
Each material has the environment impact during the
process and recycling.RP process are known as process not
suitable for making direct product. However, lates
technology makes it suitableto produce the parts with
reasonable cost. For near the future, the utilization of this
technology is becoming increasing and green manufacturing
effect should be considered.Based on study conducted,
several type of RP process is eco-efficient due to amount of
waste material produced and environment impact during the
process.
Keywords— Green Process, Rapid Prototyping, Rapid
Tooling,sustainability manufacturing, eco-
manufacturing
I. INTRODUCTION
Green manufacturing is the term categories as subset of
sustainability in which considering the environment
impact by adjusting the process within acceptable level.
Green manufacturing deals with technologies and solution
to transfer from business as usual to a sustainable level of
consumption. Interest in Green Manufacturing is
increasing from time to time meaning that make the issue
is becoming more essential. Strategy and technique to
become more eco-efficient include creating product that
consumes less material and energy, substituting input
materials reducing unwanted outputs and converting
output to input (recycling). Green manufacturing should
able to prevent pollution and save energy through the
discovery and development of technology that eliminates
and reduce the use of hazardous substances starting from
design, manufacture and application.Green manufacturing
approach is also a strategy reducing the energy usage and
material intensiveness at the manufacturing process.
Conventionally, many of decision manufacturers are
based on cost, function and quality. Currently another
dimension, environmental sustainability have to be
considered. Considering the eco-efficiency, eco-friendly
product and process are being motivated by saving the
energy cost, concern about non-renewable resources and
reducing carbon emission. Rapid Prototyping is one of
technologies that make the product more eco-efficient.
Rapid Prototyping (RP) is the process of producing
physical objects using additive manufacturing technique.
With computer technology, the designed part from 3D
computer models is produced by stacking material layer
by layer. The process utilizes computer numerical
controlled (CNC) machine tools and rapid software tool.
Today, RP are used for manufacture with wider range of
product even used to produce quality part in relative small
number.
Rapid Prototyping has been introduced on 1987 and
that was only capable of producing brittle parts. For the
time being, there has been much improvement in both
machinery and materials. This has led to improved part
quality,
enhanced
material
properties,
lower
16
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Development
Vol.1, No.1, April 2013, p.15-20
manufacturing costs and produce green process. Today
Rapid Prototyping is used in variety different applications
and becoming a viable manufacturing solution.
RP machines uses of adhesives, lasers or even plasma
to fabricate parts. Material choices vary from plaster to
titanium dependent on the technology used. Material and
process will lead to produce pollution and consumes
variety amount of electricity.
Rapid prototyping is commonly used to manufacture
visual prototypes of product for evaluation process. Visual
prototypes are usually used for market research, executive
review, and photo shoots for sales literature. Visual
prototypes have also been utilized for medical
application[1]. Intricate 3D models is created from CT
scan data allowing for better understanding of internal
structures as guidance to surgical actions.
Current technology of Rapid Prototyping is even
possible to manufacture end-use parts. The use of RP in
mass production referred to as Rapid Manufacturing due
to variety advantage of the process. Application of Rapid
Prototyping technologies enable to reduce utilization of
expensive tools, moulds and die the need for expensive retooling can be eliminated. Rapid Manufacturing is able to
be combined for the low cost of mass production.
II. REVIEW ON GREEN MANUFACTURING
There are several available work could be found in the
context on green manufacturing. The review work deals
with the concept of green manufacturing, analytical tools
to realize technology developed on green manufacturing.
Green productivity is defined in all activities attempting to
decrease wastes during manufacturing process. The
importance of green productivity as a competitive edge
was highlighted [2]. Several case studies are shown on
waste elimination practices to improve the potential green
productivity on the manufacturing performance.
Environmental frame work on green manufacturing was
proposes to tied waste management through the
elimination of causal factors[3].
The framework
incorporated environmental and social costs and values
into economic activities to support the decisions of the
management. The methodology was suggested to help
decision makers to arrange green manufacturing plans.
Another framework based on studies of achievement of
SME manufacturers on ISO 14001 certification for
sustainability to realize green manufacturing was
presented[4]. Green MRP tool modified
from
conventional Material Requirements Planning system was
proposed[5].
The
tool
includes
environmental
considerations when converting the Master Production
Schedule into the component schedules.
Analytical tools includes Life Cycle Analysis (LCA),
Design for the Environment (DfE), screening methods and
risk analysisthat emerged from process design for green
manufacturing was proposed[6]. A model to assess
environmental hazards in manufacturing was proposed[7].
The network analytic method was employed to analyze
the potential of each impact category created by different
kinds of waste in manufacturing processes. Fuzzy set
theory was used to find a numeric fuzzy weighting factor
of each impact category contributing to ecosystem.
present Clean-ability and burr reduction in aerospace
manufacturing was also presented by researchers [8].
Interest in Green Manufacturing is increasing from time
to time meaning that the term is becoming more essential.
Strategy and technique to become more eco-efficient
include creating product that consumes less material and
energy, substituting input materials reducing unwanted
outputs and converting output to input (recycling).
Evaluation of RP as Green process has been done on
various aspects. The evaluation based on electrical
consumption was presented[9]. Various manufacturing
parameters have been tested on three rapid prototyping
systems to select sets of parameters for reduction of
electrical energy consumption. Finding of this research is
important to minimize the manufacturing time but there is
no general rule for optimization of electrical energy
consumption. Each RP system has been be tested with
energy consumption considerations.The manufacturing
time is minimized by optimization of electrical energy
consumption. By consideration of the complete life-cycle
of a rapid prototyped part.
Green manufacturing aspect has to be put in all
activities on product development. The activities as shown
in Fig.1 are starting from design, procurement,
manufacturing,
packaging, customer use and
remanufacture.
Design for Environment
Principle
Design
Reuse
Dissemble
Low cost disposal
Remanufacture
Procurement
Supplier
compliance
Eco-Efficient
supply
Green
Manufacturing
Reliable to end life
Low energy use
Emission Free use
Low consumable use
Customer
Use
Manufacture
Packaging &
Distribution
Resource Efficient
Energy efficient
Emission/ Toxide
free
Lean, Safe
Returnable
Reusable
Recyclable
Fig.1 Green manufacturing product life cycle
III. TECHNOLOGY OF RP PROCESS
RP process basically are developed not respect to the
term of green manufacturing. The objective was
increasing speed on design step to produce prototype
model. Many steps of process and equipments were
eliminated by RP technology. Saving the tools is one of
aspect that this process is green.
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Development
Vol.1, No.1, April 2013, p.15-20
Generally, manufacturing process is grouped into three
categories; subtractive, formative and additive. RP
technology belongs to the additive production processes.
The part is fabricated by deposition of layers by layer
contoured in a two dimensionalplane. The height results
from single layers being stacked up on top of each other.
Characteristic of RP product is that they are not
continuous shape, but have stair-stepping effect in height
(z-direction). Smooth model can be fabricated if model is
deposited with very fine layers, i.e., smaller z-stepping.
There are two fundamental steps to completely make a
part namely generation of mathematical layer information
and generation of physical layer model.
The process starts with 3D modeling of the product
using any 3D capable CAD software. The 3D model is
exported into triangulated surface known as STL (Stereo
lithography) format.
In tessellation various surfaces of a CAD model are
piecewise approximated by a series of triangles and coordinate of vertices of triangles. The number and size of
triangles are decided by facet deviation or chorale error.
STL files are used as an input to various slicing softwares.
The determination of part deposition orientation is the
most important factor to achieve the minimum building
time, good surface quality, amount of support.
Once part deposition orientation is determined and slice
thickness is selected, tessellated model is sliced and the
data in standard data formats like SLC (stereo lithography
contour) or CLI (common layer interface) is generated.
The sliced data is used to generation of physical
model.The software that operates RP systems generates
the path depend on type of process. Generally there are
four basic deposition principle of RP machine; laserscanning (Stereo lithography), Selective Laser Sintering ,
material deposition and Fused Deposition Modeling).
The final step in the process chain is the postprocessing task. At this stage, some manual operations are
necessary that done by skilled operator. In cleaning
process, the excess elements adhered with the part or
support structures are removed. For certain models, the
surface of the model is finished by sanding, polishing or
painting for better surface finish or aesthetic appearance.
Fig. 2 Laminated Object manufacturing schematic
17
Fig.2 shows a typical example of RP machine called
Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM). Rolled material
is cur by laser follows the contour layer of the model.
Every cut sheet material is laminated pressed by a roller.
A. Advantage of RP Technology
RP process have some advantages over other
manufacturing process. Many problems facing on
Subtractive and formative manufacturing possible to be
eliminated. Starting from design stage, feature based
design are not necessary because the use of feature
information is not necessary. Blank geometry usually
defined on subtractive process is also not necessary.
Defining of complex sequences is not necessary because
the part is produced in one process.
Supporting equipments like clamping, jig, fixture or
designing mold and die are not required for Rapid
Prototyping process. Even many advantages are achieved,
limitation of the process have to be take care. Rapid
prototyping is less accurate. Part volume is generally
limited to less than one quater cubic meters, depending on
the RP machine. Metal prototypes are difficult to make,
though this should change in the near future. For metal
parts, large production runs, or simple objects,
conventional manufacturing techniques are usually more
economical. These limitations aside, rapid prototyping is
a remarkable technology that is revolutionizing the
manufacturing process. Currently, final products are
possible to be produced by RP machines.The number is
increasing as metals and other materials more widely
available. Rapid Manufacturing can not completely
replace other manufacturing techniques, especially in
large production runs where mass-production is more
economical.
B. Environmental weighting effect
Weighting method for environmental effects that
damage ecosystem and human health has been defined as
Eco indicator. Eco indicator was expansion of Life cycle
Assessment management (LCA) to include an extra
weighting factor that are environmental properties(Fig.3).
Fig. 3 Methodology of eco indicator value assignment [10]
18
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Development
Vol.1, No.1, April 2013, p.15-20
LCA is the most suitable methods for determining the
environmental impact. However, LCAs are to timeconsuming and complex. Environmental properties are
new properties of materials instead of mechanical and
physical properties. Table 2 below shows several
weighting factors respect to environmental effect. There
are about 80 materials and processes were drawn up.
TABLE I
WEIGHTING FACTOR VALUE[10]
The factor scaled from 0 to 100. Weighting factor for
common ABS material used by RP machine is 2.81 while
as for comparison, weighting factor for cast iron is 1.26.
IV. REGULATION AND GOVERNMENT SUPPORT
Government & Community pressure to evolve into
green manufacturing is increasing. Reducing the
environment impact on green manufacturing should deals
with concept, tools and technology. Indonesia agree to
reduce greenhouse gas emission by year 2020 as much as
26% from business-as-usual by national domestic efforts.
This emission reduction will further be improved as much
as 41% from business-as-usual by international supports.
To achieve this target, the Government of Indonesia
issued a national action plan to reduce greenhouse gases
emission. It is the guidance to plan, execute, monitor and
evaluate the reduction of greenhouse gas emission from
sectors of agriculture, forestry, energy and transportation,
industry and waste management.
Plastic Powder
1
2
3
2
3
Accura 50 White
1
1
3
1
2
Somos 10120 WtrClear
1
1
3
1
2
Somos 9920
1
1
3
1
2
DuraForm GF
2
3
1
3
1
DuraForm PA
2
3
1
3
1
European country and Australia were implementing the
carbonprice by establishing an authority. The Climate
Change Authority is an independent body to provide
advice on the Government's policies for reducing carbon
pollution. The Authority is established to ensure the
public is fully informed now and into the future. The
carbon price is the element of the Government’s plan for a
clean energy future: it will trigger a broad transformation
of the economy[11].
A price on carbon is the most environmentally effective
and economically efficient way to reduce pollution. This
creates a powerful incentive for all businesses to cut their
pollution, by investing in clean technology or finding
more efficient ways of operating.
In Australia, there's a raft of carbon tax-related
initiatives that have been factored into the budget
estimates but the one to watch is the so-called ''carbon
price'' of $23per tonne and will be increase 2.5 percent in
a year.Around 500 of the biggest polluters will pay for the
pollution they emit. Revenue from carbon price will be
used by the government to assist households, support job
and invest in clean energy and climate change programs.
V. GREEN EVALUATION
Rapid prototyping inherently is a green technology as it
is an additive process where no material is wasted in
constructing the part layer by layer. Compared this
additive fabrication process to subtractive operations like
machining and grinding, where all removed material is
likely to be wasted, almost no material is wasted. Rapid
TABLE II
prototyping uses fewer raw materials since all material to
MATERIAL OF RP MACHINE
be converted to the product. SLS is can be categorized
1 = Excellent
2 = Good
3 = Average non wasted RP process. No support structured is used
Fine
during building part layer by layer. Upper layer is
Smooth
Technology/
Funct supported when it immersed inside powder. However
Accurate Feature Strong
Surface
Material Family
Detail
Testing
some RP process is producing small amount waste that
used for support structure as shown in Fig.4. Overhangs
or cantilever walls need support structures as a green layer
ABS
1
2
2
3
1
has relatively low stability and strength. These overhangs
ABSi
1
2
2
3
1
and cantilever geometry are supported if they exceed a
Polycarbonate - ISO
1
3
1
3
1
certain size.
Clear
1
1
2
1
2
Vero
1
1
2
1
2
Tango
1
1
3
1
1
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Development
Vol.1, No.1, April 2013, p.15-20
19
material can be used as a pattern. Fig.5 shows the time
saving for casting process using RP technology[12].
Fig. 5Casting process reduction using Rapid Prototyping Technology
Fig. 4 Support structure used on constructing RP component[12].
The main functions of these structures are to support
projecting parts and also to pull other parts down which
due to shrinkage tends to curl up[13]. FDM and SLA are
typical examples of RP process needs the support
structure during construction.These support structures are
generated during data processing and due to these data
grows heavily specially with STL files.
Even RP is additive process, thewaste material is
occurs instead of used for support structure. For
stereolithography, the cumulative exposure to UV can
cause an entire vat of resin to become unusable. With SLS,
waste is generated with each build, because the process
requires a ratio of 20% to 50% virgin material to recycled
powder. A typical prototype will have a volume of 15% of
its volumetric (bounding box) extents.
Scrap material is also generated through bad builds and
damaged parts. With so many variables in the art of
producing a good prototype, it is unreasonable to expect
100% performance. Although the scrap rate will vary, it
would be wise to plan for 10% loss. With all of these
factors, 20% to 30% of the prototype cost is to materials.
Rapid prototyping (and additive manufacturing to
create final production parts) doesn’t require tooling,
which also means that less material and fewer resources
are used in the manufacturing process.
Rapid prototyping is green because it streamlines the
product development process so resources of all kinds
aren't wasted, including human resources, energy, time
and cost.Many of Rapid Prototyping like FDM and SLA
generates substances such as smoke, dust, hazardous
chemical, etc. which harmful to human health and the
environment. Rapid Freeze manufacturing is introduce as
clean process.
Rapid Freeze (RPF) manufacturing is essential to create
new model that are fast, clean and low cost using water as
raw material. Part is made by freezing the water. RPF
makes three dimensional of ice parts layer by layer by
freezing of water droplets.No smoke is produced during
constructing the part. The part produced by the kind of
The experiments had shown the feasibility to make
silicone molds with the ice patterns. The advantage using
ice patterns are easier to remove and no demolding step is
needed before injecting urethane or plastic parts.
Application of RFP on investment casting is a promising.
Investment casting with mold ice patterns demonstrated
several advantages over wax investment including low
cost (35%-65% reduction), high quality, fine surface
finish, no shell creaking and faster run cycle. In term of
green manufacturing, no smoke and smells isproduce in
investment casting using ice patterns from RFP.Producing
pattern from ice is significantly reducing the waste
material and pollution generated.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
Green manufacturing is factors that have to be
considered to responds the global awareness of climate
change.
Reducing environment impact on green
manufacturing should deals with concept, tools and
technology.
RP as relatively new technology in Manufacturing have
varieties impact on green manufacturing.
Rapid
prototyping is a green technology where almost no
materials are wasted. Depending on type of material used
for product, ABS has the level 2.3 of the echo indicator.
Invention on Rapid Freeze manufacturing is able to reduce
overall casting cost about 35% to 65 % and increase the
eco-efficiency.
VII.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was conducted during the activities on
IICECC. IICECC (www.iicecc.org) is institute for clean
energy and climate change established in 2011.
Publication of the paper is supported by Surya College of
Education (STKIP Surya).
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
J. Cefalu, T. Roemer, P. Kosakowski and S. Krishnan, (2011),
Incorporating 3D RP Process in Biomedical Engineering Design,
Proceedings of Midwest Section Conference of the American
Society for Engineering Education.
Mohnty R.P, Deshmukh, S.D. (1998) Managing Green
productivity, some strategic directions, Production Planning and
Control, Vol 9(7).
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Development
Vol.1, No.1, April 2013, p.15-20
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
Nadery (A, (1996), Productive design: a new design altitude.
Proceding of APO world conference on green productivity.
Burk. S, Goughran W (2007), Developing a Framework for
sustainability management in Engineering SMEs, Robotic and
Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol 23.
Melnik, S.A, et all, (2001), Green MRP: indentifying the material
and environmental impacts of production schedules, International
Journal of Production Research, Vol. 39(8).
Fiskel, J, (1996), Design for Environment: Creating eco-Efficient
Products and Process, McGraw-Hill.
Hui, I, HE. L, Dang. C, (2002), Environmental impact assessment
in an uncertain environment, International Journmal of Production
Research, Vol. 40.
Avila, M, et all, (2005), Burr minimization strategies and clean
ability in the aerospace and automotive industry, SAE Transaction
Journal of Aerospace, Vol 114.
Pascal M., Denis L., Nicolas P., (2006), Rapid prototyping:
energy and environment in the spotlight, Rapid Prototyping
Journal, Vol. 12.
Mark Goedkoop of Pre Consultants, Eco Indicators 95 Report.
Australian Government, (2012), An overview of the Clean Energy
Package, One day Seminar, Jakarta
Kunwoo, L. (1999). Principles of CAD/CAM/CAE Systems.
Addison Wesley.
Gebhardt, A., (2003) Rapid Prototyping, Hanser Gardner
Publications, Inc., Cincinnati.
20