Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
This study aims to analyse the important symbols used in 'The tattooist of Auschwitz' a novel by Heather Morris. This novel is based on the powerful true survival story of LaleSokolov, a Jew prisoner of Auschwitz. So, this article also discusses the background and importance of Holocaust fictions as well as the meaning of symbols and their significance in any literary work. Symbols add deeper meaning to the literary work. They have complex meanings and represent greater ideas. Author has used various symbols in the novel which are unconventional and new to the category of Holocaust fiction. Analysis of all important symbols will get done one by one and this article will try to study the hidden meaning of these symbols and to connect them to the broader canvas.
Facing the loss of the last generation of Holocaust survivors, progeny of survivors have begun to tattoo their ancestors' Auschwitz numbers on their own bodies. We investigate the rhetoricity of progenic tattooing through semiotic, affective, and pedagogical registers. We argue that shifting conditions of discourse across time alter decorum about public memory of the Holocaust. Further, the progenic practice, constituting a distinct form of trauma tattoo, enacts a mode of postmemory through a resignification of the original sign that makes visible the intergenerational trauma of the Holocaust.
Synthesizing Durkheim's notion of " sacred symbol " with Walter Benjamin's theorization of " authenticity, " this paper proposes the theoretical construct, " authentic symbol, " to account for the symbolic function of Holocaust relics in contemporary Holocaust pilgrimage. The symbolic function of four kinds of relics (the sites, witness/survivors, human bodily remains and accessories) is examined and compared in three different contexts: The March of the Living Holocaust tours organized for Diaspora Jewish teenagers, the Masa tours organized for Israeli teenagers and the U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C. Different ritual experiences are found to predominate in each of the three contexts, which significantly correlate with how symbols are processed by participants and the different ideological and practical aims of the tours and displays. Résumé: Résumé. Employant un synthèse de la notion Durkheimienne de " sym-bole sacrée " avec la théorisation de Walter Benjamin au sujet de " l'authenticité, " cet article propose une construction théorique nouvelle, " symbole authentique, " pour expliquer la fonction symbolique des reliques de la Shoah dans les pèler-inages contemporains vers les sites du Holocauste. La fonction symbolique de quatre types de reliques (les sites–mêmes, les témoins/survivants, les débris humains et les accessoires) est considérée et comparée en trois contextes dif-férents: les visites " Marche des vivants " organisées pour les adolescents juifs du diaspora, les visites Masa organisées pour les adolescents israéliens et le musée de la Shoah à Washington, D.C. Chaque contexte offre une expérience rituelle prédominante et différente, ce qui corrèle au traitement des symboles par les participants et les buts différents et idéologiques et pratiques de chacun des visites et des expositions.
Art in Hungary 1956–1980: Doublespeak and Beyond, 2018
The study provides the first comprehensive survey of the reception of the Holocaust in Hungarian art in the 1960s-1970s. Conclusion From the late 1950s onwards, the topic of the Holocaust had a significant reception in Hungarian art. Besides the artists discussed here, who returned to the subject several times, others also touched upon the topic in singular works. Additionally, there were state commissions, but it seems that the independently produced works and the commissioned ones resulted in developments unfolding in parallel, mostly disconnected from one another. This was due to the fact that the non-commissioned artists’ perspective was typically very different from that of official memory politics, which focused on the anti-fascist struggle and thereby instrumentalized the memory of the Holocaust, as exemplified here by the Mauthausen case study. The examples analysed here also shed light on differences in approach between periods and generations. Artists of the older generation, still temporally close to the traumatic experiences, used a surrealist, symbolic approach from the late 1950s; the primary objective of their works was the commemoration of the victims. Accordingly, they employed a Holocaust iconography referring to the locations and tools of the genocide, and symbols alluding to the victims and their memory. By contrast, a more open representation and a critical approach became prevalent in the mid-1960s, and particularly at the end of the decade; besides remembering, identifying those responsible for the Holocaust and the reasons behind it gained importance, which were frequently connected to present-day problems, such as contemporary anti-Semitism. This tendency was partly due to the fresh approach of the younger generation emerging at this time, but also influenced by the conceptual turn of the late 1960s, which brought new forms of expression. For example, the inclusion of texts helped foster a new, more open tone. It is also important to consider, besides the generational differences, the artists’ personalities, e.g. the works of Endre Bálint and János Major have significant affinities due to their satirical tone despite any differences in generation or genre. The 1960s and 1970s were characterized not only by the coexistence of generations and styles but also by a kind of thematic plurality in the works. In a number of cases the theme of the Holocaust surfaced in connection with further topics, thus visualizing different time periods simultaneously. The two possible perspectives on the Holocaust – social and individual – often appeared together, most notably in the works based on well-known documentary photographs but also recounting personal stories. These simultaneously reflect two tendencies that characterize further works as well: the generalization of the experiences of the Holocaust and personalization through emphasizing aspects of the event related to individuals or families. A number of works link the Holocaust and the Nazi era to contemporary anti-Semitism and to events such as the Six-Day War. These works represent the Holocaust as part of a broader narrative of anti-Semitism running from the past to the present. Another important characteristic of the period was the indirect articulation of messages that were nevertheless quite accessible to contemporaries. Such works leave it to the viewer to complement and interpret the visual representation by ‘reading between the lines’. A characteristic example of this elliptical mode of expression is János Major’s photograph of a gravestone marked ‘…ER ADOLF’, referencing Hitler. The use of biblical and historical allusions also belongs to this tendency. In these cases, the remote event is not used primarily to illustrate something about itself, but as a reference to the Holocaust: for instance, works dealing with the late nineteenth-century blood-libel case of Tiszaeszlár do not simply present an interesting historical episode, but use it as a parable to address the Holocaust and issues from the artists’ own era. A significant number of the works discussed here were shown to a Hungarian and (primarily in the case of conceptual works) international audience at the time of their production or a few years later. Even so, the public display of works was restricted: the works of neo-avant-garde artists, for example, often reached only a narrow subcultural audience, regardless of their topic. Despite occasional, temporary access to most of these works, no broad public discourse about the Shoah emerged during this period, and this lack of discourse was not exclusively the result of the socialist system in Hungary. In fact, such a discourse would have been anachronistic as it would have occurred before the memory of the Holocaust became globalized and the term Holocaust was widely established. The works discussed here are exceptionally significant for the very reason that (in time and in critical attitude) they were ahead of the prevailing social discourse, or – as seen in the case of the Roma Holocaust – even ahead of scholarly research on the subject.
Stredoeurópske pohľady, 2023
The study analyses the depiction of the Holocaust in the graphic novels Der Boxer [The Boxer] (2012) by the German author Reinhard Kleist and Maus I-II [Maus I-II] (1986-1991) by the American author of Polish origin, Art Spiegelman. Both texts are explicit in their anti-psychologism and emotional rationalism and base their aesthetic value not on the subject matter's originality but on the artwork's form. While Der Boxer is a realistic comic about boxing as a means of survival in the liminal situation of a concentration camp, the postmodern Maus captures the traumatic experience of genocide through the allegorical presentation of the main characters as animal beings.
ABSTRACT This thesis evaluates representations of the Holocaust in fiction and other genres and emphasises the relationship between the texts examined and the historical events they represent. The first three chapters are focussed on the victims. Chapter 1 considers representations of the death camp Treblinka in Jean-François Steiner’s novel Treblinka and Ian MacMillan’s novel Village of a Million Spirits. Questions of ideological bias and historical accuracy in works of fiction are examined. Chapter 2 considers works produced by writers who were inside the Warsaw ghetto. Readings of the diaries of Chaim Kaplan, Emmanuel Ringelblum and Adam Czerniakow, and of Bread for the Departed, a novel by Bogdan Wojdowski, assess how they add to understanding of the events they describe. Chapter 3 considers novels about the Warsaw ghetto by authors who were not personally involved: The Wall by John Hersey, The Final Station Umschlagplatz by Jaroslaw Rymkiewicz and The Beautiful Mrs Seidenman by Andrzej Szczypiorski. The potential for ideological distortion of the events is examined. The final two chapters are focussed on the perpetrators. Chapter 4 examines the role of Nazi ideology in the Holocaust, and the question of German guilt and responsibility, including the contributions of Eberhard Jäckel, Karl Jaspers and Alexander and Margarete Mitscherlich. Examples of the impact of the Holocaust on the second generation are considered, including several books of interviews with children of leading Nazis, as well as Niklas Frank’s book condemning his father Hans. Chapter 5 examines fictional representations of the Holocaust by German authors: Death in Rome by Wolfgang Koeppen, Alfred Andersch’s Efraim’s Book, Bernhard Schlink’s The Reader and Flights of Love, Rachel Seiffert’s The Dark Room, and Günter Grass’s The Tin Drum, From the Diary of a Snail and Crabwalk. These novels are considered in the light of connections between postwar Germany and the perpetrators of the Holocaust. The thesis confirms the importance of historical fact in Holocaust representation.
Human Diversity in Context. Cinzia Ferrini, ed. , 2020
Proprietà letteraria riservata. I diritti di traduzione, memorizzazione elettronica, di riproduzione e di adattamento totale e parziale di questa pubblicazione, con qualsiasi mezzo (compresi i microfilm, le fotocopie e altro) sono riservati per tutti i paesi. XIII XXIII EDITORIAL FOREWORD communication medium for scholarly exchanges among the members (here of three different nationalities: Italian, German and Spanish). The second reason concerns the Department of Humanities of the University of Trieste. One of its strategic aims is to foster internationalisation when supporting research projects, in order to reach wider audiences and to encourage dissemination of its members' scholarly results. To achieve this goal, writing in English and publishing both in print and in open access can be advantageous. In my departmental responsibility for internationalisation, I am especially concerned to facilitate these communications. These two reasons underlie my editorial policy regarding the language and manners of publication of this volume; yet they also raise a concern, for to choose the Anglophone readership as context of reference requires caution about culturally sensitive issues. Two such editorial challenges concern the degree of awareness of non-sexist language, and the use of the term 'Holocaust'. The editor is aware that, regardless of an author's intention, the generic 'man' or 'mankind' is not interpreted gender-neutrally in the English-speaking world, as testified by the Guidelines for Non-Sexist Use of Language issued by the American Philosophical Association on 19 January, 2019 10. Yet it would have been anachronistic, uncritical and decontextualised to disregard the original term 'mankind' in the English literature of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, substituting for it 'humankind' (see Chapter 1) 11 , whereas it would have been too one-sided to write of an educator or of an educator's students only in terms of 'she' and 'her' (as was done in the first draft of Chapter 8). The term 'Holocaust' is commonly used in Anglo-Saxon culture to refer to the genocide of European Jews during the Second World War, whereas in the rest of Europe and in Israel the trend is to use the Hebrew word 'Shoah'. Both words are controversial and have advantages and disadvantages. 'Holocaust' is often used in its wider, more inclusive meaning, to encompass all ethnic and social groups suffering Nazi persecution or who died at their hands. Since the eighteenth century, the lowercase 'holocaust' has been used to indicate the violent deaths of large human groups. Against it stands the Greek etymology of the word, which retains its meaning of a sacrificial victim, whether a religious offering, or due to some measure of guilt. The term 'Shoah', meaning 'calamity' or 'catastrophe', was used to refer to the Jewish genocide in order to avoid the connotation of ineluctable sacrifice, but as a Hebrew word, its standard use risks suggesting that the Nazi extermination project was restricted to a single people.
Tzvetan Todorov, who was a Bulgarian-French structuralist critic of literature and poetry, "turned his talents toward analysis of human behavior during the Holocaust of World War II, examining the virtues that inspired heroic conduct and the forces that produced horrific evil in the concentration camps" (Tzvetan Todorov Biography, n.d.). In this given work I will present an overview and analysis of his one of the famous and important articles: "The Uses and Abuses of Memory." What do totalitarian regimes do? What is a memory and why it is important? How can we use the past and in particular, which uses are good or bad?
Travesías en Clásicas (Número 1), 2023
Scottish Archaeological News, 2006
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs, 2020
Зеркало недели, 2019
Philosophiques, 1986
Konwent Klarysek skalskich a dziedzictwo kulturowe i religijne bł. Salomei, red. M. Wojenka, S. Langer, Kielce 2019
Interactions, Trade, and Mobility in Archaeology GAO International Conference 2021 7th–9th MAY 2021: POSTERS PRESENTATION, 2021
Journalism and Mass Communication, 2018
2014 IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, 2014
Contemporary Women's Writing, 2014
Visual Neuroscience, 1990
International Journal of Dairy Technology, 2016
Jurnal SPEKTRUM
Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research, 2020