Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
7 pages
1 file
Seamus Heaney’s development, as I will argue in this study, parallels that of the Irish psyche over the past fifty years. Heaney has progressed in terms of his thinking from a relatively simplistic and conventional perspective into a far more cosmopolitan and complex view of his own identity. His developing writing, encompassing, as it does, influences from different cultures, languages and texts, enacts a movement from “prying into roots” and “fingering slime” to an embrace of different aspects of European and world culture which has strong parallels with the development of Ireland itself. I will be examining how Heaney progressed from a personal vision of digging into his familial past to a more Jungian view of digging into the historical consciousness of his psyche. However, I will also be suggesting that to see North in particular, and Heaney’s writing in general, as in any way a simplistic account of a nationalistic outlook is to misread them completely. I will argue that these books adopt a far more complex attitude to issues of nationalism, Catholicism and Irishness. From being a backward, inward-looking country, obsessed with the past and with a sense of inferiority, Ireland has begun, in the words of Robert Emmet, to take her place among the nations of the earth. By this, I do not just mean in economic terms, as evidenced by the much lauded Celtic Tiger phenomenon. I also mean in cultural, social and intellectual terms, as we become more confident of our place in Europe, and of our position as a bridge between Europe and America. Because the thrust of my argument suggests a parallel between the development of Heaney’s own thought and the developing sense of self-consciousness and sophistication of contemporary Ireland, my approach will be broadly chronological, grouping different works into different stages of development. While such a procedure is necessarily arbitrary, nevertheless I feel that there is an internal coherence in the groups of texts which I have chosen.
2001
This essay discusses the nature of postcolonial versions of Irishness and deconstructs the Manichean categories of selfhood and alterity which feature in both colonial and postcolonial discourse. Using some ideas from Derrida and looking at some work by Seamus Heaney, notably An Open Letter, this essay argues for a more nuanced sense of Irishness.
ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal, 2021
Seamus Heaney's writings and studies reveal his yearning for Irish culture and identity as a poet. In literature, regardless of time or place, readers seek answers and gain insight into the questions and identities that are at the core of literature. This study carries an attempt to show how identity for Seamus Heaney is at the heart of poet"s preoccupations. He explores the tensions within by saying that one is unique as long as he is "multicultural", "a conglomerate of identities, of truths". For Heaney prevention of one's own culture and identity is the sole purpose of every writer. Being a farmer"s son, Heaney was the only child in his family who broke this farming tradition by choosing to become a writer and later on, his poetry became the voice of his people, and the memo of Irish historical horizons. In this study, the author attempts to demonstrate Seamus Heaney's desire to preserve the culture and identity of Ireland, since he was of the belief that colonization is not only a political problem, but a way to destroy the country's culture and identity.
New Hibernia Review, 2004
The Comparatist, 1996
This paper is not about the Uterary burden of the past, but rather about four middle-aged male, canonical poets writing in Ireland today and the poems they have written occasioned by the death of their (biological) fathers. Seamus Heaney, Michael Longley, Thomas KinseUa and Paul Durcan were aU born between 1927 and 1944, and thus are no longer young men. Each of them has been composing elegiac poems for his father which have become more complex with the aging perspective of their authors, and are weighted even more heavüy by the association of the death of the father with the death of tradition in Ireland.
2015
The Irish poet Seamus Heaney's second collection, Door into the Dark (1969), shows the reader a more confident Seamus Heaney who is prepared to take risks and to explore new areas. The final poem in the first book, Death of a Naturalist, Ends with the lines 'I rhyme/ to see myself, to set the darkness echoing', which tells us his reasons for writing poetry. He continues the theme of searching the darkness in Door into the Dark. He searches into the art of writing poetry, the darkness of his own self and also Irish history and the Irish countryside. The bloody battle of Vinegar Hill is told in ballad form and is linked closely to the land itself in 'Requiem for the Croppies'. Seamus Heaney says that he sees the Bogland as 'the memory of the landscape' and in 'Bogland' he 'set up-or rather laid down-the bog as an answering Irish myth' (Preoccupations, 1980).This paper will explore the depiction of Seamus Heaney's own self through differe...
The thesis analyses two poetic works in English by Irish authors, published respectively in 1968 and 1972, The Battle of Aughrim by Richard Murphy and The Rough Field by John Montague. Both published in their definitive form after long years of gestation, the works in question present in narrative poetic form two intersecting visions of Irish history. These visions are steeped in two different and complementary perspectives. On the one hand, Richard Murphy belonged to a family of the Anglo-Irish Protestant Ascendancy, and he lived and published in the Republic of Ireland. On the other, John Montague had Northern Irish Catholic origins; born in Brooklyn to parents who emigrated from Ulster after the political division of 1922, he returned to County Tyrone at the age of four and, after his years of education in Ulster and Dublin, led a cosmopolitan life between Ireland, France and the United States. Both poets represent, in these works, a journey within themselves, to define or rediscover their own identity; at the same time, they investigate, in a journey through history, the roots of the division of Ireland, each poet going back to a symbolic moment. This moment, for Murphy, is the Battle of Aughrim in 1691, which marks the definitive affirmation of English rule, the beginning of the era of the Penal Laws and of the golden age of the Anglo-Irish Ascendancy. Montague, instead, takes as a point of reference the defeat of Hugh O'Neill at Kinsale in 1601, a moment in which the logic of the English colonization of the island, with the definitive reconquest by the Tudors, caused the fall of the old Gaelic order. A comparative approach is adopted between the two works, aiming at underlining their differences and similarities. A particular focus is reserved to the modes of remembrance in the two communities, and to the ways in which the two poets deal with the same historical and cultural issues, from religious divisions to the aspects of modernity erasing old lifestyles. In both cases, the analysis highlights how a form of exile is evident in the poets’ stance, deriving mainly from the severed ties with family origins and backgrounds and from the poets’ new position in the society of 1960s Ireland. It is not perhaps by chance that two historical exiles, the Flight of the Earls and that of the Wild Geese, play such an important role in the poems. The insistence on historical matter, and the position of outsiders in relation to their own social groups account for the several points of contact between the two works as analysed in the fifth chapter: from the impact of modernity on old, ritualized ways of living, to the presence of the past in today’s reality, both in the minds and in a sort of archaeological quest for remains; from the portraits of rebels and planters, to the subsistence of old symbols, such as the severed head, and the prehistorical references to hillforts defaced by new roads; and finally, the question of the land, of its ownership, and of its narrowness, both in its physical reality and as a mental effect on the narrowing of thought on successive generations. The result is a picture of Ireland made from complementary points of views, starting from the poets’ backgrounds, memories and experienced realities to give shape, in the end, to very different poetical expressions of their journeys, after having followed similar paths and having encountered the same problems.
Revista Domenechiana, 2020
// Поволжская археология. 2024, № 2 (48). с. 26-42., 2024
recorriendo la historia del municipio de Soria a través de la arqueología, 2024
2017
Filozofska istraživanja, 2023
Povijesni prilozi, 2002
Library History Today Blog 1, 2024
International Journal of …, 2007
Medicine - Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado, 2004
ACM SIGGRAPH 2002 conference abstracts and applications on - SIGGRAPH '02, 2002
Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 2001
Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2001
Ahmar Metakarya, 2022
Revista chilena de infectologia : organo oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia, 2017
Zastita materijala, 2014
International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications, 2017
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2014
Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 2016