Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
6 pages
1 file
Differences between baroque and rococo architecture Style, it's a stable form of something. For a long time, art and architecture have been closely associated. Artistic methods are a strange point of view of art, large methods have emerged as a result of the evolution of artistic thinking and understanding of space and time and the evolution of the world's vision from another perspective. In art history, there has been a change in the prevailing patterns, so that different times are associated with a certain and stable artistic thought that is influenced by many factors and affects many fields including architecture. Baroque and Rococo architecture, this architecture is unlikely to leave anyone indifferent, it's either causes a storm joy or an absolute denial. Until this day, many architects and other designers resort to Baroque and Rococo styles, because this aesthetic resonates in the spirit of everyone who saw it. However, in many cases, these historical patterns can only be understood by those who have studied them in-depth. How did these styles appear and these distinctive features? And how do we make a distinction between Baroque and Rococo architecture?
Undergraduate lecture on Baroque and Rococo art and architecture in Europe and the New World.
Nexus Network Journal, 2009
With the new architecture still in constant evolution, and its forms fragmented, bent, twisted and folded out of any immediately recognizable shape, a comparison with older, more canonical architecture also helps us to see the new, and to understand what we are seeing.
Interstices, 2017
The Baroque in Architectural Culture, 1880-1980 is aimed at exploring two projects, "the intellectual history of modern architecture and the history of architectural historiography." In doing so, the book "defines a role for the baroque in the history of architectural historiography and in the history of modern architectural culture." The historical understanding of baroque as a phenomenon of the sixteenth and seventeenth century is acknowledged in the book, but the central focus is on how the baroque has been created in our more recent past. Or, more accurately, its focus is to unpack how particular politics of our recent past have shaped how the baroque is understood from the 1880s to the 1980s. The book draws our attention to which stories of our recent past have flourished, and which have fallen by the wayside. Thus the book asks the reader to consider how the baroque has been shaped by privileging a particular understanding, author, text, and national location.
Nexus Network Journal, 2009
With the new architecture still in constant evolution, and its forms fragmented, bent, twisted and folded out of any immediately recognizable shape, a comparison with older, more canonical architecture also helps us to see the new, and to understand what we are seeing.
The paper analysis the evolution of Baroque art and its development. The artistic style popularized as Baroque had different stylistic variations and sub-phases of development and diffusion. The movement/ style, according to many, began in Rome, but thrived in its various forms in different parts of Europe (Spanish Baroque, Northern Baroque, French Baroque etc.) at different time periods between the late 16th to early 18th centuries CE (1580-1720). The style has often been divided into 3 phases. (It is important to remember that such chronological boundaries are usually arbitrary but nevertheless useful in examining the evolution in Western art).
The Journal of Art Historiography, 2016
Among the theoretical patterns that shaped art history between the nineteenth and twentieth century, formalism has undoubtedly a central place, with the turning point of Heinrich Wölfflin’s publication of the Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe (Principles of Art History) in 1915, which offered practical tools to interpret works of art on the basis of the historical forms of sight.1 One of the crucial contributions of early twentieth-century German formalist scholars was the creation of the conditions to reconcile modernity with the Baroque. Directing her attention to the architectural historiography of the Baroque from 1845 to 1945, Evonne Levy points out that ‘political circumstances pressed those who studied the history of art to compare that epoch [i.e. the seventeenth century] to their own’.2 The temporal frame defines a century that had, at its beginning, Jacob Burckhardt’s entry ‘Jesuitenstil’ for the ninth edition of the Conversations-Lexikon3 (chapter one) and, at its end, th...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
X Coloquio de Historia Canario-Americana , 1994
Kgm Paralegal, 2023
Seramik Araştırmaları Dergisi , 2023
Journal for the General Philosophy of Science, 2024
Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 2021
Communications of the Acm, 2012
Psicologia & Sociedade, 2018
Tic & société
International Journal Of Culture And Art Studies, 2024
Aquatic Toxicology, 2018
Journal of Virology, 2018
Revista TransVersos, 2019
Jurnal Penelitian Enjiniring, 2019
Arqueologia Vol. 30 Núm. 2, 2024
Remote Sensing
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2013
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016
Food Science and Quality Management, 2019