Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Turlington office), or (352)392-6772 (LSA) Office Hours Mon. 8:30-11:30 AM in Turlington office or by appointment at LSA
Paleoindian Settlement in the Southeastern United States: The Role of Large Databases. In New Directions in the Search for the First Floridans, edited by David Thulman and Irv Garrison, pp. 241–275. University Press of Florida, Gainesville., 2019
Two large research databases developed in recent years, popularly known by their acronyms PIDBA and DINAA, have been helping us understand early human settlement in Southeastern North America, defined here as extending from Florida to Virginia on the east, and Louisiana and Arkansas on the west. PIDBA, or the Paleoindian Database of the Americas, has been under construction since 1990, providing distribution maps, attribute data, and images for Paleoindian projectile points, as well as compilations of radiocarbon dates and bibliographic references. DINAA, the Digital Index of North American Archaeology, in contrast, was established in 2012 with the goal of integrating or, more accurately, rendering interoperable archaeological site file data, while providing links to information about specific sites in other databases, collections, and publications, using the formal site number as the common referent, or indexing tool. While PIDBA now covers all of North America, DINAA, much like PIDBA in its early years, has been slowly expanding coverage, and currently includes information from roughly half a million sites from 15 states in the Eastern United States. Both databases are open access, with content freely available to all interested parties online, and can be easily found by searching for their acronyms, or linking directly to them at http://pidba.tennessee.edu and http://ux.opencontext.org/archaeology-site-data/.
2013
This paper's genesis is the perception that archaeologists' communal memory of the early days of South Carolina plantation archaeology is fading, incomplete or at times overly judgmental. In order to combat this loss, some of the projects, processes and theoretical orientations that affected South Carolina's plantation studies are explored. Examples of influential forces are the growth of Cultural Research Management (CRM), burgeoning museum and university programs in historical archaeology, and initially the Tricentennial and Bicentennial. Early references have been searched, including much of the "grey literature" and archaeologists and administrators in academia, government and private industry have been interviewed. Interview topics include early theoretical perspectives and how they relate to field and laboratory methods. Statistical methods have not been used in this study; results are interpretive and qualitative rather than quantitative. Instead, examples have been drawn from the literature of the period to illustrate trends in early South Carolina plantation archaeology. THE FIRST PLANTATION EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA Although large plantation-related CRM projects began in the late 1970s, initial plantation explorations began in South Carolina a decade earlier. In the 1960s and 1970s interest in funding historical archaeology investigations blossomed due to South Carolina and Charleston's Tricentennial (1970) and the U.S. Bicentennial (1976)-driven search for historic sites. To date the earliest recorded plantation excavation is at Old Town Plantation. In 1967-1968 the South Carolina Tricentennial Commission hired a local amateur archaeologist, John Miller, to search for the seventeenth-century Charles Towne Landing site (38CH1) (South 1971:8). Miller thought he found those ruins. Stan South and John Combes were hired in 1968-1969 through the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology (SCIAA) to do more work. Through slot-trench testing they realized that Miller had instead uncovered the remains of the Horry-Lucas House (38CH1-11), built about 1780 (South 1971:69,86). South and Combes' tests also revealed nineteenth-century slave houses' foundations (South 1971:86-88). [No colonoware is mentioned (see also South 1971:124).] The main purpose of SCIAA's work was to uncover the remains of the 1670s Charles Towne Landing site, so no more work was undertaken at the plantation ruins. Archaeological investigations are still undertaken at federal and state-owned plantation sites. These occur under government or grant-funded professional and student research projects. An example is Beck's intriguing work at Brattonsville Plantation, a backcountry agrarian site (1998). Government-owned plantation sites are also investigated under the auspices of Cultural Resource Management (CRM) projects if legal conditions warrant it (e.g., Stine et. al. 1994).
1976
Description A two-phase archeological project was carried out at Fort Johnson, South Carolina (38CH275) during January and March 1976 to evaluate the archeological resources that would be impacted by the construction of the Southeast Utilization Research Center. The survey phase of the project utilized a subsurface sampling technique based upon the random placement of test cores throughout the site. This phase of the project revealed a single component shell midden associated exclusively with Hanover Ware ceramics and the second phase of the project was performed to intensively investigate this midden. Separate activity areas were delineated during this excavation and two radiocarbon dates were obtained from oyster shell in the midden. The implications of this study are of considerable importance both from the point of view of archeological method as well as understanding prehistoric behavior patterns on the South Carolina coast.
Revista Quatro Cinco Um, 2021
Kritiknetz – Zeitschrift für Kritische Theorie der Gesellschaft, 2023
Russian Politics & Law, 2009
Synthese, 2024
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 2024
Vezetéstudomány, 2008
International Journal of Advanced Research, 2019
Metabolites, 2021
Phytotherapy Research, 2010
Brazilian Journal of Biology, 2024
Lecture Notes in Operations Research
Jurnal SITECH : Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi, 2020