Academia.eduAcademia.edu

National survey of professional practice in child sexual abuse

1991, Journal of Family Violence

A sample of 276 professionals described how they spend their professional time, their attitudes and knowledge about etiology and treatment of sexual abuse. Professionals were also asked to respond to a case vignette where varied on two dimensions: age of the child victim and relationship of the offender to the victim. Agencies receiving the questionnaire were randomly assigned to one of the six possible scenario conditions resuhing from the two dimensions.

Journal of Family Violence, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1991 National Survey of Professional Practice in Child Sexual Abuse Jon R. Conte, 1 Linda Fogarty, z Mary Elizabeth Collins 3 A sample of 276 professionals described how they spend their professional time, their attitudes and knowledge about etiology and treatment of sexual abuse. Professionals were also asked to respond to a case vignette where varied on two dimensions: age of the child victim and relationship of the offender to the victim. Agencies receiving the questionnaire were randomly assigned to one of the six possible scenario conditions resuhing from the two dimensions. KEY WORDS: child sexual abuse; professional practice; survey. INTRODUCTION Having discovered and documented the extent (Finkelhor, 1984; Russell, 1983) and impact (Browne and Finkelhor, 1984; Conte, 1985) of child sexual abuse, public and professional attention to this problem has considerably expanded. Research has continually documented that sexual abuse is not rare and that it can have a detrimental effect on well-being, frequently requiring mental health intervention. In response to this acknowledged need, the field of sexual abuse treatment has grown rapidly in the last several years. MacFarlane and Bulkley (1982) report that in 1978, the National Center for Child Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN) estimated only a dozen programs available to deal with intrafamilial child sexual abuse; whereas in 1981, 300 such programs were identified. A more current 1986 directory of child sexual abuse treatment programs (Denver Research Institute, 1986) lists 608 specialized treatment programs not including individual therapists or general human ser1School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 7"School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 3School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637. 149 0885-7482/91/0600-0149506.50/0 9 1991 PlenumPublishingCorporation 150 Conte et al. vice organizations (e.g., community health centers) which may also provide treatment services in sexual abuse cases. Recently, Keller et al. (1988) conducted a 3-year study of various treatment programs throughout the country to compare approaches, assess impacts, and identify model practices. As they report (Keller et al., 1989), there was substantial variation among current programs along the dimensions of system context, client focus, and types of services provided. For example, although many programs (48%) were affiliated with general social service or mental health agencies, over half were affiliated with other types of agencies (e.g., hospitals). In regard to client group served, most often (35%) agencies served victims, abusers, and families, while the other agencies focused on either one or two of these groups. Similarly, the various programs offered a wide range of services using different techniques (e.g., art therapy, play therapy, behavior modification), in a range of formats (e.g., individual, group, family, dyad), with possible supportive services (e.g., transportation, child care). To complement the work of this research, data are needed from the professional rather than the programmatic focus. An early study (Forseth and Brown, 1981) examined attitudes of a small sample (n = 36) of professionals who treat intrafamilial child sexual abuse and found that professionals favor no single treatment approach, but support a variety of interventions based on family needs. More detail is needed on the type of case circumstances that support the use of one type of intervention over another. In addition, as the field has grown, many fundamental issues that have been hotly debated among practitioners need exploration. Some of the more common debates include the appropriate role of the mental health professional in investigations, the proper balance between the treatment needs of the victim and those of the offender and family, the appropriate goals of treatment, the child's need to confront the offender, the therapeutic role of prosecution, and the comparative attributes of individual, family, and group therapy. While some of these issues are discussed individually in the literature, a comprehensive understanding of the professional community's opinions on these issues is lacking. Similarly, there has been little systematic collection of information regarding how those who treat sexual abuse view the problem, although previous studies of other professional groups have demonstrated that attitudes are likely to influence outcomes. For example, Finkelhor (1984) found different professional groups tended to recommend different interventions in cases of child sexual abuse. Saunders (1988) found attitudes toward child sexual abuse differed among professional groups (i.e., social workers, district attorneys, police, public defenders, judges) regarding vic-