Collegium Antropologicum 30 (Suppl. 2): 105-114.
HIV/AIDS 1
Aleksandar Štulhofer*
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zagreb
Pamela Brouillard
Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi
Nebojša Nikolić
Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka
Nina Greiner
IOM Croatia, Zagreb
HIV/AIDS and Croatian Migrant Workers
Abstract
Due to their geographical mobility and long periods of separation from intimate
partners, migrant workers are at increased risk for a variety of sexually transmitted
infections (STIs) including HIV/AIDS. This study sought to investigate patterns in
HIV/AIDS related knowledge, attitudes and sexual behaviour in migrant workers in
Croatia. In 2003, 566 male migrant workers were recruited during regular required
medical examinations and surveyed at seven locations throughout the country. Each
participant was asked to complete a self-administered KABP (sexual knowledge,
attitudes, beliefs and practices) questionnaire. The average age of respondents was 38.2
years and the majority worked as seafarers (77.3%) and construction workers (20.5%).
Only 18.5% of respondents were able to correctly answer all 13 questions assessing
knowledge of HIV/AIDS. Seafarers reported higher levels of knowledge than did
construction workers. The average respondent reported having had two sexual partners
in the last 12 months, with slightly over half of the respondents (55.3%) reporting
condom use at their last intercourse with a casual partner. One fifth of the respondents
(20.3%) who reported having had intercourse with a sex worker during the last year
reported not using condoms at last intercourse. The number of sexual partners was
correlated with age, marital status, faith in God, and personal HIV risk assessment.
Attitudes toward condom use, co-workers’ HIV/AIDS concerns and the duration of
migrant status (within the last two years) were shown to be significant correlates of
condom use at last intercourse with a casual partner. The effect of HIV/AIDS related
knowledge on analyzed behaviors did not reach statistical significance. Inadequate
patterns of migrant workers’ condom use, gaps in knowledge about HIV transmission
and modes of protection, as well as widespread ignorance regarding available
anonymous HIV testing found by this study suggest a critical need for expert intervention
to avert the potential for an increase in new HIV/AIDS cases. A coordinated, systematic
campaign for HIV/AIDS prevention among Croatian migrant workers should focus on
*
Correspondence should be addressed to the primary author at the Dept. of Sociology, Faculty of
Philosophy, I. Lučića 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
[email protected].
HIV/AIDS 2
increasing peer communication about HIV/AIDS, especially among younger migrant
workers, and on reducing the frequency of sexual risk taking.
KEY WORDS: Migrant workers, seafarers, construction workers, HIV/AIDS,
knowledge, attitudes, sexual behavior, Croatia
RUNNING HEAD: HIV/AIDS and Croatian Migrant Workers
Introduction
Developing trends in HIV transmission and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
(AIDS) indicate that the incidence of new cases of in many parts of Eastern Europe and
the former Soviet Union is among the highest in the world.1 Recent studies suggest that
migration patterns may significantly affect transmission rates, especially in vulnerable
populations.2 Migrant workers (MW) appear to be one such vulnerable group,
particularly in countries that currently have low incidence rates and where the perceived
risk of acquiring the infection is low.
The country of Croatia is currently characterized by both low prevalence (0.010.02%) and incidence rates of HIV/AIDS relative to other parts of Eastern Europe. In
2001 there were 330 registered HIV-positive individuals living with AIDS in Croatia,
compared to 303 in 2000. However, during a three-year period from 2000 to 2003, 37
new cases were reported in contrast to only 22 new cases reported during a ten-year
period in the nineties, suggesting that transmission rates are on the rise.3 In addition, the
majority of cases are men with heterosexual transfer (39.2%), with homosexual transfer
accounting for the second largest group (33.7%).
Given a relatively long history of low incidence and prevalence rates overall, the
HIV/AIDS epidemic has received relatively little attention in the Croatian media and has
generally been seen as a low priority in public health discussions. However, recent
increases in incidence rates, albeit small, would suggest that the possibility for a rapid
expansion of the number of cases exists, especially given documented trends in
neighboring countries.4-6 If such an expansion were to occur, the need for a high profile
campaign of education programs as well as increased testing and treatment facilities will
rapidly become critical. This may prove especially challenging in a post-socialist
democracy given Croatia’s limited financial resources and a public health care system in
HIV/AIDS 3
need of revitalization. In addition, an absence of data on sex workers and migrant
workers who account for the majority of cases4, as well as infrequent HIV testing,
particularly outside of major urban areas, and growth in the population of intravenous
drugs users, a group typically characterized by a variety of risky behaviors (e.g. needle
sharing, unprotected sexual relationships, etc.), are important issues that will need to be
addressed to meet this challenge successfully.6,5
Regardless of their sexual habits in their original environment, MWs are at
increased risk for a variety of sexually transmitted infections (STI), including HIV/AIDS,
due to their geographical mobility and long periods of separation from their sexual
partners. Croatian epidemiological data confirms this, with an estimated 90% or more of
infections resulting from heterosexual activities engaged in abroad. The population of
seamen MWs accounts for more than a half (55%) of all cases.3 This population may be
especially vulnerable given that Croatian MW’s exist in a cultural milieu where the risk
of HIV infection is not widely recognized.
Vulnerability of Migrant Workers
Separated from domestic social structures, norms, values, language and social support,
MWs are more likely to engage in risky behaviors. Risks are embedded in the transient
nature of migrant worker’s lives; the longer the time spent away from home, the higher
the probability of engaging in high-risk sexual contacts7 Other factors, such as
characteristics of lifestyle and working environment related to specific professions, may
increase the odds of infection.
A good example of the increased vulnerability is the work and living conditions
of seafarers, who confined to the same working and living shipboard space for long
periods of time, suffer constant exposure to hazardous environmental conditions.
Merchant seafaring has for a long been identified as a particularly hazardous occupation
with morbidity and mortality higher than in most occupations ashore.8,9 Their suicide rate
is higher than in other occupational groups.9-14. Travel to many parts of the world also
increases exposure to infectious agents, rarely encountered in their native countries. In
addition, physical factors such as noise, temperature extremes, macro vibration, toxic
cargo, work aboard ship under severe weather conditions, the risks of mechanical
HIV/AIDS 4
malfunctions, and finally piracy and violence all contribute to seafarers’ vulnerability.15,16
Loneliness, isolation, lack of privacy and interpersonal stress are the factors that, in
combination with an absence of normal domestic routines and the strict social hierarchy
associated with life aboard a ship, can cause extreme psychological stress.17
Numerous reports have focused on the rates of SDI’s among seafarers.18,
19
Shortly after HIV was recognized as the cause of AIDS, it was pointed out that seafarers
could be particularly vulnerable to HIV infection.20-24 Long periods of separation from
intimate partners are common for migrant workers and results in an increased frequency
of potentially risky paid sex. Although important structural changes and modernization
have re-shaped the maritime trade, drastically shortening the time spent in ports12,
available data do not suggest a reduction in HIV infection incidence among seafarers.25-29
Sex industry in many ports has adapted to the mentioned changes by transporting sex
workers to anchored ships, often in collaboration with the port authorities.
According to various estimates there could be as many as 40,000 Croatian MWs
including seafarers, construction workers and truck drivers. Several important differences
between these groups are worth noting. First, construction workers and truck drivers,
because of the nature of their work, have increased opportunities for social and sexual
contacts although their contacts are less culturally diverse then of seafarers. Secondly, the
level of professional stress in these groups is low in comparison to seafarers, which may
influence the frequency of risky behaviors. Third, while Croatian seafarers work
primarily for international companies, construction workers and truck drivers are more
likely to be employed by local, domestic companies. This is a crucial difference in terms
of the availability of HIV/AIDS related information. Unlike the case of modern seafaring,
where efforts have been made to raise awareness regarding HIV/AIDS, primarily through
informational brochures and medical manuals that are compulsory by international
regulations on every ship30,
31
, concern about STI and HIV/AIDS within national
construction and trucking companies is marginal at best.
Individual lifestyle factors and personality characteristics may also figure
prominently as predictors of sexual risk taking as demonstrated in a number of
HIV/AIDS studies. It is plausible to speculate that some men are drawn to migratory
occupations because of an expectation of certain psychological pay-offs such as sexual
HIV/AIDS 5
opportunities etc. In such cases, the overall level of risk taking would be determined by
both occupational and individual characteristics.32, 33
The following study was part of a project entitled Research and Capacity
Building on HIV/AIDS and Croatian Migrant Workers and was supported by the Global
Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria program coordinated by the Croatian
Ministry of Health. It examined the patterns of risky sexual behaviors, HIV/AIDS related
knowledge and relevant attitudes among different groups of MWs. The goal of the study
was to identify factors contributing to HIV-risks in this population in order to provide an
empirically sound basis for intervention programs. Previous studies carried out on
Croatian seafarers did not provide such insights.34, 35
Methods
Sample Selection and Data Collection
Participants were solicited from three groups of MWs: seamen, construction workers and
transportation drivers. In order to capture a pool of MW participants, health care-workers
at 25 clinics and institutions that perform mandated employment physicals throughout
Croatia were contacted. These physicals are required for licensing in a variety of
professions in Croatia. Each participant was asked to voluntarily fill out a self-report
questionnaire during a routine mandated medical exam.
Health care workers at each participating facility were given instruction in data
gathering procedures, either through face-to-face contacts, or in writing by the project
coordinator. Issues regarding privacy were given particular emphasis to guarantee
confidentiality of the responses. In order to insure total anonymity each institution was
given a receptacle in which respondents could deposit their response forms without
having to hand their questionnaire to staff. Given the large number of facilities
participating in the project, health care workers were specifically instructed not to give
assistance in the form of interpretation of questions, even if specifically asked to do so as
to insure uniform data gathering procedures to the degree that it was possible.
Questionnaire and Instruments
HIV/AIDS 6
A questionnaire was constructed in order to quantitatively measure of HIV/AIDS
knowledge, relevant attitudes and patterns of sexual behavior of three groups of migrant
workers. Standardized questions on HIV/AIDS related knowledge and indicators of
sexual risk taking were taken from previous IOM sponsored studies on HIV/AIDS related
behaviors in MW’s. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 80 variables (42 questions)
divided in several sections. The first section contained questions about a number of sociodemographic variables and time spent working abroad. The second part of the
questionnaire included questions measuring levels of HIV/AIDS related knowledge.
These questions were divided into two groups: (a) questions measuring knowledge of the
modes of HIV transmission, and (b) questions measuring knowledge of the modes of
protection. The third part of the questionnaire measured perceptions of personal risk of
HIV/AIDS infection, the respondent’s evaluation of attitudes of friends and co-workers
towards HIV/AIDS, attitudes about individuals living with HIV/AIDS, and attitudes
about condom use. The final part of the questionnaire requested information about sexual
behavior patterns, alcohol and other drug use during sexual activities, and questions about
changes in sexual behaviors due to perceived risks about STIs and HIV/AIDS. Questions
about sexual orientation, HIV/AIDS testing, the availability of HIV/AIDS information,
sexual harassment and experience of STI were also included in the questionnaire. The
questionnaire was pre-tested at the beginning of December 2003 on a small number of
workers, in order to verify readability and comprehension. Total time to complete the
questionnaire was 10-20 minutes.
HIV/AIDS related knowledge was measured by two composite variables: (a) an
index of the knowledge of the modes of transmission and (b) an index of knowledge of
the modes of protection. The indices were expressed as summed scores of seven and six
items, respectively. Participants could respond to questions by circling either “yes”, “no”
or “don’t know”. The questions regarding the modes of transmission asked whether
HIV/AIDS could be transmitted by re-using intravenous drug shooting equipment or
shaving blades, by mosquito bites, by using public toilets, by having sex without using
condom, from a pregnant HIV positive woman to her baby, by hugging someone who has
AIDS, and by drinking from the same cup or glass with somebody who has AIDS. The
six questions about the modes of protection asked whether it is possible to protect oneself
HIV/AIDS 7
from HIV/AIDS by getting vaccinated against AIDS, by using condoms, by not re-using
shooting equipment or shaving blades, by abstaining from sex, and by having sex only
with people who look clean and healthy. Both indices had moderate reliability (0.69 and
0.52 respectively).
A number of other questions were used, either singly or in aggregate, to assess
attitudes about related items of interest. Attitudes toward condom use were assessed by
aggregating responses to four questions measuring the acceptance of negative beliefs
about condoms (“A woman will lose a man’s respect if she asks him to use condom”;
“Using a condom is a sign of distrusting a partner”; “Only homosexuals and sex workers
use condoms”; “Condoms diminish sexual pleasure”). Respondents were asked to use a
5-item scale ranging from “completely disagree” to “agree completely” when answering
these questions. The larger the value of the composite indicator, the more negative
attitude. The index of attitudes toward condom use had moderate reliability (alpha =
0.68). Sexual risk taking was assessed through the following two indicators: (a) the
number of sexual partners in the last twelve months and (b) condom use at last
intercourse with a casual partner. Due to its skewed distribution, the variable assessing
the number of partners was dichotomized so that 0 denoted only one sexual partner and 1
two or more sexual partners. Respondents’ concerns about HIV/AIDS were measured by
the following question: “Are you afraid of becoming infected with HIV/AIDS?”
Respondents use a 4-item scale, ranging from “very much so” to “not at all”, for
recording answers. Respondent’s assessment of co-workers HIV/AIDS concerns was
measured by the following question: “Would you say that the people you work with are
concerned about HIV/AIDS?” Response options were “yes”, “no”, and “I don’t know”.
The variable was dichotomized so that 0 denoted that respondent’s co-workers are
concerned and 1 that they are unconcerned or that respondent could not tell. Religious
beliefs were measured on a 4-item scale assessing the importance of God in respondent’s
life. The scale ranged from “highly important” to “unimportant”. Formal education was
expressed in the number of years spent in educational institutions.
Data Collection
HIV/AIDS 8
Data collection took place over a five-month period from December 2003 through midMay of 2004. Completed questionnaires were collected from clinics in seven out of the
ten cities contacted for participation in the study (Zagreb, Rijeka, Zadar, Split,
Dubrovnik, Čakovec and Slavonski Brod). In total, 570 questionnaires were collected,
accounting for approximately 1.5% of the estimated international seaman population
(30,000), and approximately 2.4% of the construction worker population. Sampling of the
transportation driver’s population was less successful with only seven truckers
completing questionnaire. This appears to be due to a legal loophole regarding whether
these workers are required to have annual medical examinations or not. Less than 1% of
the questionnaires were incorrectly filled out, and while more than 25% contained
missing data they were not excluded from the data analysis, except for those few in which
less than 70% of the questions were answered. However, female respondents were
excluded from the analysis due to a small number (4).
Despite clear procedures for recording the rate of participation, none of the local
coordinators supplied actual data regarding refusal rates. When contacted by phone
regarding participation rates, we were able to attain general assurances that “almost no
one” refused to participate in the study.
Statistical Analyses
Data were analyzed by using a standard statistical software package (SPSS 11.5).
Bivariate relationships were examined by chi-square test and oneway ANOVA
procedure. Logistic regression models were created to predict condom use at last
intercourse with a casual partner, number of sexual partners in the preceding year and
HIV related behavioral change. Only p levels < 0.05 were considered statistically
significant.
Results
Basic demographic data, number of years in MW status and length of time working
abroad are shown in Table 1. The average age in our sample was 38.2. The majority of
respondents were seafarers, more than two thirds of which were marine officers. Most
HIV/AIDS 9
respondents reported having secondary education One third of the sample, almost
exclusively maritime officers, reported having a college education.
[INSERT TABLE 1 ABOUT HERE]
The majority of participants were married, moderately religious, and had some
knowledge of foreign languages. On average, the men surveyed spent from eight
(construction workers) to almost fourteen years (maritime officers) in MW status. During
the preceding two years, they spent at least 38% of time working and living abroad.
Again, the group of marine officers that was characterized by the longest average time
spent in MW status during the last 24 months.
Table 2 presents data on the respondents’ sexual behavior and its possible
consequences.
[INSERT TABLE 2 ABOUT HERE]
Although most respondents had a single sexual partner in the 12 months
preceding the study, a substantial minority reported multiple partners. Sailors were
significantly overrepresented among MW with more than one partner. This appears to be
related to the fact that they are also the youngest of the three groups and the least likely to
be married. No significant differences were found among the three groups of MW
regarding the last sexual partner; the respondent’s wife or girlfriend in the majority of
cases. However, 10-17% of respondents indicated that the last person they had sex with
was a casual partner. Less than 2% of respondents reported that their last sexual episode
was with a sex worker.
The survey questionnaire included several questions on condom use on different
occasions. Approximately 30% (29.6) of respondents indicated reported not using a
condom during intercourse with a casual partner. Among the surveyed MW who had paid
for sex at least once, a majority (51.7%) did report condom use during their last
commercial sex encounter. However, one fifth of respondents (20.3%) failed to do so.
The least educated group of MW, construction workers, were significantly less likely to
HIV/AIDS
10
have used a condom during their last commercial sex encounter. Although the majority
of respondents reported that they never had anal sex, most of those who did have anal sex
reported not using a condom the last time they had anal sex. There were no significant
differences between groups regarding anal sex condom use. A minority of respondents
(14 out of 547) reported that they engaged in same-sex sexual activities in the preceding
year.
About 6-12% of respondents reported having had a sexually transmitted infection
(STI) at least once, with marine officers being overrepresented among this group. As
expected, we found an association between the length of the MW status and the
experience of STI (rho=0.16; p<0.01). Half of the marine officers and almost as many
sailors (47%) had been tested for HIV antibodies. The fact that they were significantly
more likely to have been tested than construction workers should be attributed to the fact
that many maritime companies require a HIV test from potential employees. This was
confirmed by the finding that more than three quarters of surveyed seafarers reported
having been tested because it was required.
Analysis of responses to items measuring HIV/AIDS related knowledge suggest a
slight difference between levels of knowledge regarding the modes of HIV transmission
and knowledge of modes of protection from HIV infection. Only 34% of respondents
provided correct answers to all seven questions on HIV transmission, while 37.9%
correctly answered all six questions regarding HIV protection. The analysis clearly points
to gaps in the HIV/AIDS related knowledge among Croatian MW, mostly due to
misconceptions and myths about HIV transmission (infection through use of public
toilets, mosquito bites and sharing glass with an infected person), and beliefs that healthy
looking partners can not be infected, or that abstinence is ineffective protection from
HIV/AIDS.
Looking for differences in the levels of HIV/AIDS knowledge within the MW
sample, we carried out additional analyses using composite measures of knowledge about
HIV transmission and HIV protection (Table 3). The findings point to moderately high
levels of knowledge, which are not equally distributed within the sample. In both cases,
seafarers were found to have more information than construction workers, which
probably reflect their higher formal education. In addition, when asked about the
HIV/AIDS
11
availability of HIV/AIDS information materials in the working environment, it was found
that construction companies provide such materials less often than do maritime
companies. In the case of knowledge of the modes of HIV protection, levels in marine
officers exceeded that of both sailors and construction workers. No significant differences
in HIV/AIDS related knowledge were found between different age cohorts.
[INSERT TABLE 3 ABOUT HERE]
Overall, attitudes toward condom use were favorable and the majority of
respondents rejected common myths and prejudices regarding their use. An important
exception from these generally favorable attitudes was found in responses to a question
regarding practical aspects of condom use. When asked whether they agreed that
condoms interfere with sexual pleasure, the largest number of MW responded “yes”
(49%). No significant differences in responses were found among the three groups of
MW or among different age cohorts.
Next, we analyzed the possible association between formal education, HIV/AIDS
related knowledge and attitudes toward condom use. As expected, the three dimensions
were found to be significantly related, with correlations ranging from low to moderate.
Respondent’s level of education was associated with both measures of knowledge
(r=0.21, p<0.001 and r=0.29, p<0.001), but not with attitudes toward condom use
(p<0.52). Scales of the modes of HIV transmission and the modes of HIV protection were
inter-correlated (r=0.55, p<0.001), and both were found to be significantly associated
with attitudes toward condom use (r=--0.15, p<0.01 and r=--0.23, p<0.001, respectively).
Multivariate logistic regression models predicting number of sexual partners in
the preceding years and condom use at last intercourse with casual partner are shown in
the next two tables. In the first case (Table 4), we found that age, being married or in
stable relationship, faith in God and personal concerns about getting infected with HIV
significantly reduce the odds of having two or more sexual partners in the preceding year.
Respondents who are older, religious, married or in a stable relationship, and concerned
about HIV risks are less likely to have had multiple partners. The effect of HIV/AIDS
related knowledge did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate model.
HIV/AIDS
12
[INSERT TABLE 4 ABOUT HERE]
In addition to the variables entered in the regression analysis presented above, the
model predicting condom use at last intercourse with a casual partner included having
multiple sexual partners (two or more). Only three variables proved to be significant
predictors: amount of time spent working abroad (during the last two years), co-workers’
concern about HIV/AIDS risks, and attitudes toward condom use (Table 5). According to
these findings, respondents who spent more time working and living away from home,
those who perceive their co-workers as concerned about HIV/AIDS risks and those who
have more positive attitudes toward condom use were significantly more likely to have
used condoms during their last casual sexual encounter. Interestingly, 20.3% of our
respondents reported that they never had sex outside of marriage or a committed
relationship.
[INSERT TABLE 5 ABOUT HERE]
It should be noted that our regression models explained only a fraction of variance
in independent variables, pointing to an important role of unaccounted factors.
Discussion
According to the findings, a sizable proportion of those MW surveyed had engaged in
sexual risk taking. Only slightly over a half of respondents (55%) used a condom during
their last intercourse with casual partner; 30% did not use it and 15% claimed not to
remember whether they have used it or not. A fifth of respondents who used sex workers’
services had unprotected sex on the last such occasion. Furthermore, condoms were
infrequently used during anal sex with any partner. Although it is impossible to establish
the magnitude of HIV/AIDS transmission risk in our sample, as we lack the necessary
information about type of sexual acts, nationality and other characteristics of sex workers
and casual partners, sexual risk taking seems to be a part of MW experience for both
Croatian seafarers and construction workers.
HIV/AIDS
13
When considering the findings of the present study as a whole, several points
related to its possible limitations bear mentioning. Our sample selection was specifically
targeted at groups known to account for the majority of cases of HIV/AIDS in Croatia
and these findings apply exclusively to those particular subgroups of MW: merchant
marines and construction workers. Thus, the generalizability of these results to other
groups of MW (e.g. truck drivers, women) is limited. The factors that influence sexual
choices at both an individual and socio-cultural level for these groups are likely to be
quite different and may include situations and behaviors that make them especially
vulnerable to the risk of HIV/AIDS.2
While every effort was made to insure privacy and confidentiality during data
collection, some participants may have had concerns about responding to questions
asking for sensitive information in an employment related environment. Formal data
regarding refusal rates was not collected and it may be that some at risk individuals chose
not to participate and selected themselves out of the sample. Even those individuals who
did participate may have withheld information or responded in a more positive way than
would be typical due to the demand characteristics of the questionnaire. Social
desirability in responding is known to influence responses in both non-vulnerable36 and
vulnerable populations.37 In addition, questionnaires were self-administered and could
have been impacted on by individual variables such as educational level and time
constraints. Indeed, some questionnaires were incomplete and it is unclear to what extent
the missing data may have influenced the results. In spite of these limitations, the size of
the sample was sufficiently large and varied to provide a reasonable picture of HIV/AIDS
knowledge, attitudes and related behaviors in a group known to be at risk.
Although we lack more detailed insight into MWs’ sexual activities (especially
regarding dyadic or relationship aspects), the data collected does suggest different
patterns of sexual behavior among groups of Croatian MW. Sailors reported the highest
number of sexual partners and marine officers appeared to use condoms more often than
other respondents, particularly construction workers. In addition to these behavioral
differences, construction workers were found to be significantly less well informed about
HIV/AIDS and less likely to have been tested for HIV then the other two groups of MW.
This difference in knowledge seems to be caused by a combination of individual and
HIV/AIDS
14
structural factors. On one hand, construction workers were the least educated group of the
three (p<0.001) and both indices of HIV/AIDS knowledge were found to be significantly
associated with years of formal education (p<0.001). On the other hand, HIV/AIDS
information is more often provided by maritime than construction companies. While over
70% of surveyed seafarers claimed that HIV/AIDS informational brochures are present in
their working environment, the same was reported by less than half (41%) of construction
workers.
Interestingly, no differences were found in attitudes and beliefs regarding condom
use suggesting a widespread normalization of condom use in Croatia, which was also
observed also in a recent study of adolescent sexuality.38 In the year preceding the study,
the Croatian bishops’ conference issued a public statement condemning condom use as
ineffective in protecting users against STI. Although our instrument did not measure
religious beliefs regarding condom use, the beliefs and attitudes we did measure proved
unrelated to the importance of faith, as well as to formal education and age.
In contrast to an earlier, albeit smaller, research study on Croatian seafarers34, we
found that marine officers were more likely to have contracted STI than sailors and
construction workers. This unexpected finding can not be fully explained by our data.
One possibility is that officers were simply more honest about their STI experience. Also,
being better educated, it is possible they were more ready to seek medical help when
experiencing symptoms of STI, which would result in their under-representation among
respondents with undiagnosed STI. Assuming that our finding is unaffected by the
limitations suggested above, the cause of higher prevalence of STI among marine officers
could be related to the length of time spent working and living away from home. On
average, marine officers spent a statistically significant greater time in MW status than
the rest of participants (see Table 1). If STI risks are highly correlated to the duration of
MW status, then the findings that marine officers were more likely to use condoms than
sailors and construction workers could be, at least partly, the consequence of their STI
experience.
Regression analyses offered a more detailed insight into factors mediating
HIV/AIDS risks. Some of them are individual, such as age, religiousness and the
experience of STI, others relational (the impact of being married or in a stable
HIV/AIDS
15
relationship) or socio-cultural (time spent working abroad, peer concerns). As extensively
elaborated in contemporary social science research on HIV/AIDS, sexual risk taking is a
complex phenomenon that includes personal (rational and irrational motivation),
interpersonal and socio-cultural determinants, and is rarely consistent over time.39,
40
Simply put, personal risk management is a process highly sensitive to experience, social
interaction and the dominant – or, sometimes, subcultural - social construction of
HIV/AIDS risks. Still, intervention approaches to Croatian MWs’ sexual risk taking is at
this point primarily focused on the individual, aiming at increasing knowledge, changing
beliefs and behaviors, and needs to be informed by relevant research findings. In that
respect, our study emphasizes the importance of: (a) focusing on the young and
unattached MW, and (b) influencing personal and peer concerns regarding HIV/AIDS. In
addition to specific educational programs, the latter may also be achieved by designing
discussion provoking HIV/AIDS materials available in MWs’ working environments.
Peer concerns shared in off-duty discussions were found to have a preventive impact, and
if provided with appropriate background materials, could serve as informal basic sex
education.
How risky is observed sexual behavior of Croatian MW? As already mentioned,
the population of seafarers accounts for more than a half of all HIV/AIDS cases in
Croatia. According to our analyses, the majority of our participants reported having
casual sex, but only slightly over a half of them used condoms at last such occasion. In
addition, every fifth migrant worker who had ever paid for sex did not use a condom the
last time they bought sex. Clearly, the initial question cannot be answered solely within
individual approach to HIV/AIDS risks, which is focused on personal knowledge,
attitudes, beliefs and behaviors. This rather limited perspective, overly relying on rational
choice paradigm41, should be expanded by a more context-sensitive approach.39, 40, 42
Is there a distinct MW sexual culture in Croatia? The notion of sexual culture
usually refers to a system of sexual symbols, values, knowledge, beliefs, expectations and
practices that characterize certain social groups or communities.43-46 Some authors point
out that MW’s indeed develop a “migrant identity”46 and even a “culture of migrancy”,
often blending indigenous and foreign sexual macro scripts that can “lead to a denial of
certain (sexual) behaviors”.47 Since MW “commute” between two or more cultures, it
HIV/AIDS
16
seems plausible that they would develop a hybrid sexual culture, an amalgam of home
and host sexual cultures. Behaviorally, this could mean that they either compartmentalize
their sexual behavior (exhibiting one pattern at home and another when abroad) or adopt
a new standard of behavior that reflects their migrant experience. When home and host
communities differ greatly in the level of social control and sexual permissiveness, such
non-compartmentalized behavior could be very costly.
Returning to the question regarding a sexual culture of Croatian MW, it should be
noted that no ethnographic data on Croatian construction workers is currently available.
They have less formal education than seafarers (p<0.001) and come from different
regions and social backgrounds, but are mostly raised in smaller (often rural or semirural) communities. In contrast, seafarers are a more homogenous population.
Traditionally, seafarers were recruited almost exclusively among men from the coastal
areas of Croatia, which is still largely the case. From the 1970s on, the coastal areas have
experienced a rapid tourist development, which has changed the local, restrictive Catholic
sexual culture by promoting sexual permissiveness – particularly among young men.
Coastal communities in Croatia still maintain sexual a double standard, imposing rather
strong social control over young women, but not young men. As reported in the first
Croatian HIV/AIDS study, young men from coastal areas exhibit the highest level of
sexual risk taking49, particularly during the summer season. In that sense, seafarers are
socialized sexually in a rather permissive environment, but one that is at the same time
characterized by gender inequality and a strong moral influence of the Church, especially
in marital matters. This could pose some problems for intervention programs, especially
those that focus on MWs’ wives.
An important feature of the dominant sexual culture in Croatia is its systematic
ignorance of HIV/AIDS risks. Due to the fact that Croatia is a low-prevalence country at
present, there is little or no public awareness of differential, profession-related HIV/AIDS
risks. This and the fact that HIV/AIDS situation in other countries, including the
neighboring ones, is never addressed in the “inward-looking” Croatian mass media,
makes local MW especially vulnerable. Our findings suggest a learning process by which
MW develop a concept of differential risk of casual sex with local and foreign partners.
Unlike the number of sexual partners, length of working and living abroad proved to be a
HIV/AIDS
17
significant predictor of condom use at last casual sex encounter. Individual sexual risks,
to which MW are exposed, become collective when they return to their local
communities. Especially in the case of young and unmarried seafarers whose often
conspicuously lavish lifestyle attracts a high degree of peer attention. The fact that many
seafarers return to their local communities as well-off individuals significantly affects
their social status and desirability. This may have been of particular importance during
the 1990s, when the social costs of post-communist transition and the 1991-1995 resulted
in a sharp increase in unemployment, poverty and social inequality, as well as in an
overall rise of uncertainty and insecurity. Unfortunately, this potentially important
dimension remains outside of the scope of this paper. Our survey did not assess possible
impact of the post-communist transition. What we know, in general, is that several
aspects of gender and sexual relations were subject to socio-cultural change prompted by
the transition processes.50 What remains to be explored is whether (and how) this great
political, economic and social transformation impacted sexual behaviors and MW sexual
culture(s) in Croatia.
HIV/AIDS
18
ZNANJE O HIV/AIDS-u, STAVOVI I SEKSUALNO PONAŠANJE HRVATSKIH
RADNIKA MIGRANATA
Sažetak na hrvatskom
Kada je riječ o HIV/AIDS-u i drugim spolno prenosivim bolestima, radnici migranti su
osobito ranjiva skupina. Geografska mobilnost, duža izbivanja iz lokalne zajednice i
odvojenost od partnera čine ih izloženijima seksualnim rizicima nego što je to slučaj s
općom populacijom. Ova studija se temelji na istraživanju HIV-relevantnog znanja,
stavova i seksualnog ponašanja 566 radnika migranata, prosječne dobi od 38.2 godine.
Ispitanici su anketirani prilikom redovitog testiranja u sedam ordinacija medicine rada
širom Hrvatske. Podatci su prikupljeni upitnikom koji su ispitanici sami ispunjavali.
Većinu ispitanika su činili pomorci (77.3%) i građevinskih radnika (20.5%). Samo je
18.5% anketiranih radnika migranata točno odgovorilo na sva pitanja o HIV/AIDS-u
(postavljeno je 7 pitanja o načinima prijenosa i 6 pitanja o načinima zaštite), pri čemu su
pomorci iskazali bolje znanje od građevinskih radnika. Kada je riječ o seksualnom
ponašanju, ispitanici su u prosjeku imali dvije seksualne partnerice tijekom posljednjih
godinu dana. Nešto više od polovine (55.3%) je koristilo kondom pri posljednjem odnosu
sa slučajnom partnericom. Jedna petina ispitanika (20.3%) nije rabila kondom pri
posljednjem odnosu s osobom koja prodaje seksualne usluge. Broj seksualnih partnerica
pokazao se povezan s dobi, bračnim statusom, vjerom u Boga i osobnom procjenom
rizika zaraze HIV-om. Stavovi prema uporabi kondoma, zabrinutost suradnika (kolega s
posla) zbog HIV/AIDS-a i dužina migrantskog statusa (tijekom posljednja 24 mjeseca)
identificirani su kao korelati uporabe kondoma pri posljednjem odnosu sa slučajnom
partnericom. Znanje o HIV/AIDS-u nije se pokazalo značajnim prediktorom niti u jednoj
od provedenih regresijskih analiza. Nezadovoljavajuća uporaba kondoma pri rizičnim
odnosima, nedovoljna razina znanja o HIV/AIDS-u i rašireno nepoznavanje mogućnosti
testiranja na HIV upućuju na potrebu intervencije i sustavne prevencije u populaciji
radnika migranata. Prema našim nalazima, napore treba usmjeriti na intenziviranje
komunikacije o rizicima HIV/AIDS-a u radnoj okolini (utjecaj referentne skupine),
osobito među mlađim radnicima migrantima, te smanjivanje učestalosti rizičnih
ponašanja.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Mary Haour-Knipe for her comments and suggestions on
the original study.
HIV/AIDS
19
References
1. AMIRKHANIAN, Y. A., J. A. KELLY, E. G. BENOTCH, A. M. SOMIAI, K. D.
BROWN, M. I. FERNANDEZ, & K. M. OPGENORTH, Cent. Eur. J. Public Health, 12
(2004) 12. – 2. UNAIDS: Population Mobility and AIDS. (UNAIDS Technical Update,
Geneva, 2001). – 3. KAIĆ, B. : HIV infection and migration in Croatia. (Paper presented
at the 2nd International Conference of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care Among Mobile
Groups in Southeastern Europe, Skopje, 2004). – 4. KUZMAN, M., J. MIMICA, V.
MARDEŠIĆ, K. MUŠKOVIĆ, K. KOŽUL: HIV/AIDS related risk behaviors in
especially vulnerable young people in Croatia. (UNICEF, Zagreb, 2002). – 5.
NOVOTNY, T., D. HAAZEN, O. ADEYIA: HIV/AIDS in Southeastern Europe: Case
studies from Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania. (World Bank Working Papers, Washington,
D.C., 2003). – 6. POWER, R., J. MIMICA: Rapid assessment of illicit drug use in the
Republic of Croatia. (UNDCP, Zagreb, 1999). – 7. INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION AND THE JOINT UNITED NATIONS
PROGRAMME ON HIV/AIDS: Mobile Populations and HIV/AIDS. (IOM/UNAIDS,
Geneva, 2003). – 8. ROBERTS, S. E., Int. Marit. Health, 53 (2002) 43. – 9. HANSEN, H.
L., Occup. Environ. Med., 53 (1996) 269. - 10. JAREMIN, J., E. KOTULAK,
M.STARNAWSKA, S.TOMASZUNAS, J. Travel. Med., 3 (1996) 91. – 11.
RAFNSSON, V., H. GUNNARSDOTTIR, Int. J. Epidem., 23 (1994) 730. – 12.
FILIKOWSKI, J., W. RENKE, M. RZEPIAK, Bull. Inst. Mar. Trop. Med. Gdynia, 43
(1992) 13. SWEDISH COMMISSION ON WORKING CONDITION: A survey of jobs
posing special risk to health. (Ministry of Labour, Stockholm, 1990). - 14. JENSEN, O.
C., J. F. L. SØRENSEN, M. L. CANALS, H. YUNPING, N. NIKOLIĆ, M. THOMAS:
Incidence of self-reported occupational injuries in seafaring – an international study. In:
Kanals M.L.: Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Maritime Health, (7th
ISMH,Tarragona, 2003). – 15. TOMASZUNAS, S., J. Occup. Med., 36 (1994)465. – 16.
SHARPALOV, K. A., Bull. Inst. Mar. Med. Gdynia, 43 (1992) 57. – 17. NITKA, J., Bull.
Inst. Mar. Trop. Med. Gdynia, 41 (1990) 1. – 18. ARYA, O.P., Genitourin. Med.,
68(1992) 84. – 19. VUKSANOVIĆ, P., A. LOW, J. Travel Med., 9 (1991) 121. – 20.
WHO, ILO: Global Programme on AIDS. Consensus statement from the consultation on
AIDS and seafarers. In: WHO: GPA INF 89.21, (WHO/ILO, Geneva, 1989). – 21.
DHAR, J., D. J. TIMMINS, Br. Med. J., 303 (1991)1132. – 22. REYN, C.F., M. MANN,
J. CHIN, Bull. WHO, 62 (1990) 251. – 23. ROSILLO, R., C. GARCIA, M. T. SIERRA
LOPEZ, Medicina Maritima, 1/6 (1998) 293. – 24. HANSEN, H. : Occupation-related
morbidity and mortality among merchant seafarers with particular reference to infectious
diseases, (South Jutland University Press, Esbjerg, 1996). - 25. GOLD, E. Y., Y. A.
BOSCHENKO, L. I. KOROBOV, V. O. RYZCHKO, A. A. MANTURA: Sailors as a
potential source of importation of HIV-infection. In: TOMASZUNAS S. (Eds.):
Proceedings from XI International Symposium on Maritime Medicine, (Institute of
Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Gdynia, 1989). – 26. ESTEBANEZ, P., C.
SARASQUETTA, R. NAJERA, G. CONTRERAS, I. Perez, J. Acquir. Imune Defic.
Syndr., 5 (1992) 316. – 27. CANALS, M. L., Med. Maritima, 1/6 (1998) 279. – 28. PERANDERS, M., H. SUBHOSH: Sexually transmitted diseases. In: DUPONT H. C., R.
STEFFEN (Eds.): Textbook of Travel Medicine and Health, (BC Decker Inc., Hamilton,
Ontario Canada, 1997). – 29. TOWIANSKA, A., E. ROZLUCKA, J. DABROWSKI,
HIV/AIDS
20
Bull. Inst. Mar. Med. Gdynia, 43 (1992) 19. - 30. EASTMAN, P. F., J. M. LEVINSON:
Sexually transmitted diseases. In: EASTMAN P. F., (Eds.): Advanced First Aid Afloat.
(Cornell Maritime Press, Centervile, Maryland, 2000). – 31. WHO: Sexually transmitted
diseases. In: WHO: International Medical Guide for Ships, 2nd edition. (WHO, Geneva,
1994). – 32. HANSEN, L. H., G. PEDERSEN, Int. J. Epi., 25/6 (1996) 1237. – 33.
RAFNSSON V., H. GUNNARSDOTTI, Br. Med. J., 306 (1993) 1379. – 34. MULIĆ, R.,
D. ROPAC, I. GJENERO-MARGAN, M. MULIĆ, Društv. istraž., 13(6) (2004) 1143. –
35. SESAR, Z.: Epidemiološko istraživanje infekcije HIV-om u naših i stranih pomoraca
duge plovidbe. (Medicinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci, Rijeka, 1998). – 36. PAULAUS,
D. L., J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 46 (1984) 598. – 37. SALTZMAN, S. P., A. M.
STODDARD, J. MCCUSKER, M.W. MOON, & K. H. MAYER, (1987). Pub. Health
Rep., 102 (1987) 692. – 38. ŠTULHOFER, A., G. ANETRIĆ, S. SLOŠAR, Rev. soc., 35
(2004) 31. – 39. BAJOS, N., AIDS Care, 9 (1997) 227. – 40. HAOUR-KNIPE, M., and P.
AGGLETON, Critical Pub. Health, 8 (1998) 257. – 41. MOATTI, J-P., N. BELTZER,
and W. DAB, (1996): Analysing unsafe behaviour in the face of HIV infection. The
limits to rationality. In: M. BOZON and H. LERIDON, (Eds.): Sexuality and the Social
Sciences. (Aldershot, Darthmouth,1996). – 42. BAJOS, N., and J. MARQUET, Soc. Sci.
Med., 50 (2000) 1533. – 43. PARKER, R., G. HERDT, and M. CARBALLO, J. Sex
Res., 28 (1991) 77. – 44. DOWSETT, G., Cult. Health Sex., 1 (1999) 95. – 45.
BHENDE, A. A., C. JENKINS, AIDS 12, suppl. B, (1998) 51. – 46. TARR, C. M., P.
AGGLETON, AIDS Care, 11 (1999) 375. – 47. WOLFFERS, I., I. FERNANDEZ, S.
VERGHIS, and M.VINK, Cult. Health Sex., 4 (2002) 459. – 48. GADON, M., R.-M.
CHIERICI, P. RIOS, AIDS Care, 13 (2001) 801. – 49. AJDUKOVIĆ, D., M.
AJDUKOVIĆ, and R. PRIŠLIN: AIDS i mladi. (Medicinska naklada, Zagreb, 1991). –
50. ŠTULHOFER, A., T. SANDFORT : Sexuality and gender in times of transition. In: A.
ŠTULHOFER & T. SANDFORT (Eds.): Sexuality and gender in post-communist Eastern
Europe and Russia. (The Haworth Press, New York, 2005).
HIV/AIDS
21
Table 1 – Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample
% (n)
Age
19-30
31-49
50 up
31.5% (174)
49.7% (275)
18.8% (104)
Primary school
Secondary school
University degree
5.3% (30)
59.7% (336)
35% (197)
married
single
steady relationship
divorced / separated
widow
56.5% (318)
18.5% (104)
21.5% (121)
3.2% (18)
0.4% (2)
merchant marine officers
merchant marines
drivers
construction workers
civil engineers
others
Knowledge of foreign languages
no
yes
Faith in God
very important
fairly important
little important
unimportant
Church service attendance
regular
occasional
never
53.3% (300)
24% (135)
1.2% (7)
17.9% (101)
2% (11)
1.6% (9)
Education
Marital status
Occupation
Numbers of years in the MW status*
seafarers, officers
seafarers, sailors
construction workers
Length of time working abroad during the
preceding 24 months (in months)*
seafarers, officers
seafarers, crew members
construction workers
* p < 0.001
14.4% (80)
85.6% (475)
44.1% (245)
38.7% (215)
9.5% (53)
7.6% (42)
13% (72)
67% (373)
19.8% (110)
Mean (SD)
14.0 (10.6)
12.3 (11.0)
8.3 (9.2)
12.9 (4.9)
11.8 (5.5)
9.2 (8.3)
HIV/AIDS
22
Table 2 – Sociosexual characteristics of the sample
Seafarers,
crew
members
(n=135)
% (n)
Construction
workers
204 (71.3)
40 (14)
27 (9.4)
15 (5.2)
67 (57.8)
12 (10.3)
20 (17.2)
17 (14.7)
73 (70.9)
16 (15.5)
10 (9.7)
4 (3.9)
168 (56.6)
86 (29)
34 (11.4)
5 (1.7)
4 (1.3)
63 (49.2)
37 (28.9)
22 (17.2)
4 (3.1)
2 (1.6)
71 (65.1)
25 (22.9)
11 (10.1)
1 (0.9)
1 (0.9)
148 (50.5)
65 (22.2)
29 (9.9)
51 (17.4)
45 (38.5)
26 (22.2)
20 (17.1)
26 (22.2)
37 (35.2)
33 (31.4)
13 (12.4)
22 (21)
143 (48.8)
23 (7.8)
127 (43.3)
52 (43.3)
11 (9.2)
57 (47.5)
33 (30.8)
11 (10.3)
63 (58.9)
26 (8.8)
85 (28.9)
183 (62.2)
17 (13.8)
31 (25.2)
75 (61)
10 (9.4)
26 (24.5)
70 (66)
5 (1.7)
287 (98.3)
5 (4.2)
113 (95.8)
4 (3.9)
99 (96.1)
146 (50)
146 (50)
66 (52.8)
59 (47.2)
20 (18.7)
87 (81.3)
36 (12.3)
257 (82.7)
7 (5.8)
113 (94.2)
6 (5.6)
101 (94.4)
Seafarers,
officers
(n=300)
Number of sexual partners (in the preceding 12
months)**
1
2
3-4
5 and more
Sexual partner at last intercourse
wife
girlfriend
casual partner
sex worker
other
Condom used at last intercourse with a casual
partner*
yes
no
do not remember
never had casual sex
Condom used at last intercourse with a sex worker*
yes
no
never had paid sex
Condom used at last anal sex
yes
no
never had anal sex
Same-sex sexual activities (in the preceding year)
yes
no
Have tested for HIV***
yes
no
Ever had a STI*
yes
no
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001
(n=112)
HIV/AIDS
23
Table 3 - Differences in HIV/AIDS knowledge according to occupation and age groups
Knowledge of the modes of
Knowledge of the modes of
transmission
protection
Mean (SD)
Occupation
Seafarers, officers (A)
Seafarers, crew members (B)
Construction workers (C)
All
5.89 (1.34)
5.52 (1.49)
4.89 (1.78)
5.60 (1.52)
F = 16.9; p < 0.001; C ≠ A, B
5.17 (1.00)
4.70 (1.22)
4.22 (1.55)
4.87 (1.23)
F = 24.8; p < 0.001; A ≠ B, C;
B≠C
5.77 (1.38)
5.55 (1.57)
5.32 (1.73)
5.58 (1.54)
n. s.
4.99 (0.97)
4.84 (1.33)
4.76 (1.39)
4.87 (1.23)
n. s.
Age groups
19-30
31-49
50 up
All
(n.s. = non significant)
Table 4 - Correlates of number of sexual partners in the preceding year
(n = 392)
Age
Education
Married/in stable relationship
Length of time spent working abroad (during the last
24 months)
Faith in God
Co-workers’ concern about HIV/AIDS
Personal concern about HIV/AIDS
HIV/AIDS related knowledge
OR / (p)
0.95 (.001)
1.05 (n.s.)
0.17 (.001)
1.01 (n.s.)
95% C.I.
0.92 - 0.97
0.64 – 1.74
0.09 - 0.31
0.96 – 1.05
1.32 (.05)
0.61 (n.s.)
0.59 (.001)
1.02 (n.s.)
1.00 - 1.75
0.35 – 1.06
0.45 - 0.76
0.90 – 1.16
Table 5 - Correlates of condom use at last intercourse with casual partner
(n = 295)
Age
Education
Married/in stable relationship
Faith in God
Length of time spent working abroad (during the last 24
months)
Co-workers’ concern about HIV/AIDS
Personal concern about HIV/AIDS
HIV/AIDS related knowledge
Attitudes toward condom use
Multiple sexual partners
OR / (p)
0.99 (n.s.)
1.25 (n.s.)
0.95 (n.s.)
0.80 (n.s.)
1.05 (.05)
95% C.I.
0.97 – 1.02
0.76 – 2.05
0.48 – 1.87
0.60 – 1.05
1.01 – 1.1
1.74 (.05.)
1.10 (n.s.)
1.03 (n.s.)
0.55 (.01)
1.44 (n.s.)
1.02 – 2.98
0.83 – 1.46
0.90 – 1.17
0.38 - 0.79
0.79 – 2.61