Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
3 pages
1 file
Which of these arguments should a Christian accept as sound, and why? 1. Only God should be worshiped. 2. Jesus should be worshiped. 3. Therefore, Jesus is God. (i.e. Jesus is God himself; they are numerically one.) 1. Jesus isn’t God. (i.e. they are numerically two) 2. Only God should be worshiped. 3. Therefore, Jesus should not be worshiped. 1. Jesus isn’t God. (i.e. They are numerically two.) 2. Jesus should be worshiped. 3. Therefore, it is false that only God should be worshiped.
This paper uses an evidentialist approach to demonstrate the thesis that God condemns the wicked to an everlasting conscious judgment in the lake of fire.
Our first thanks go to Leslie Mitchner of Rutgers University Press for commissioning this volume and believing in it from the outset. We also give our deepest thanks to Dana Miller for a superb typing job; to Jerry Ohlinger for the many stills that grace this volume; to Michael Andersen for his assistance with the bibliography; to Dennis Coleman for help in research; to Virginia Clark for tirelessly checking facts and copyediting the first draft; to Eric Schramm for an excellent job of copyediting subsequent drafts; and to David Sterritt for a thorough and meticulous reading of the final text.
This paper examines the question of whether immortality is inherent or bestowed only upon the righteous at the return of Christ. One's view of immortality has important implications for the final punishment of the wicked.
Christian Research Journal, 1991
This is a paper I found from Jonathan Gibson concerning hell. I post it here because of the recent debate concerning Rob Bell's new book "Love Wins".
During the late eighteenth and early-nineteenth centuries, the Second Advent movement was a potent religious force in both Europe and North America. Its adherents focused on a specific date for the literal fulfilment of Christ’s Second Advent—his return to earth to establish his kingdom. In America, the rising prosperity and growth of social democracy of the Jacksonian era evoked a fervid optimism that for many focussed on utopian visions of America’s millennial glory. Such an environment proved fertile ground for the theories of William Miller, and his followers, the Millerites, who became the largest and most influential early nineteenth-century American premillennial group. William Miller (1782-1849) was a primarily self-educated farmer living in upstate New York who, while raised a Baptist, became a Deist as a young man. Following his participation in the War of 1812, he first questioned and then rejected his Deist beliefs, undergoing a dramatic conversion experience and rejoining the Baptist Church. In order to respond to the questions of his Deist friends regarding the Bible’s reliability and their accusations that the Bible contradicted itself, Miller began a systematic reading of the Bible from Genesis to Revelation. While reading, Miller became convinced that the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to the earth would take place, “about the year 1843”. He began to publicly proclaim this Second Advent message in 1831, and soon gathered a large number of followers who accepted his message. Miller came to his conclusions because of the particular way in which he approached Scripture—seeing the Bible as a “feast of reason”—and by using a very systematic approach influenced by Scottish Common Sense Philosophy and based on Historicist principles. Miller approached the Bible “rationally” and a belief in the Bible’s perspicuity, literality, and truthfulness, was at the core of his hermeneutical approach. While he himself refrained from setting an exact date, he eventually accepted the October 22, 1844 date predicted by Samuel S. Snow. When this date passed without Christ’s return, the majority of Millerites gave up their beliefs. A minority of Millerites maintained their beliefs in the soon return of Jesus Christ and/or the significance of October 22, 1844. These groups developed a variety of explanations for Jesus’ non-appearance on that date and either reinterpreted the event linked to October 22, 1844 or set other dates for Christ’s return. The Seventh-day Adventist denomination that formally formed in 1860 out of these Millerite believers was one such group who developed an alternative scenario allowing them to maintain their belief in the significance of the October 22, 1844 date. The Seventh-day Adventist Church is now a 17 million strong denomination with a worldwide presence that reads and interprets the Bible using an approach that owes a great deal to Miller’s hermeneutic.
One of the greatest challenges our community has always faced is the difficulty justifying our claim that we have the correct understanding of the gospel, while hundreds of millions of Christians and their churches have gone astray. Brother Roberts recognized the force of this challenge, addressing it frankly in his confrontationally entitled work 'Christendom Astray from the Bible'.
Presented on Friday, February 10, 2017, during the 13th Annual Seminary Scholarship Symposium at the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary on the campus of Andrews University in Berrien Springs, MI. Many New Testament scholars have noted significant differences between the theology of the undisputed Pauline writings and that of Colossians. One of these differences is the abundance of pneumatology in the former and its apparent absence in the latter. Most scholars agree that pneumatology is a central theme for Paul, but some of them question its presence in Colossians and, therefore, challenge its claimed Pauline authorship (Col 1:1; 4:18). Other scholars see the presence of the Spirit permeating the content of the letter in a way that corresponds with typical Pauline theology. Most, however, recognize some pneumatological references, but these are seen to be few and limited. This debate raises the question: If Colossians is a Pauline epistle, where is the Spirit? This study seeks to answer this question by conducting an in-depth exegetical and intertextual analysis of pneumatological language and concepts in the undisputed Pauline writings and Colossians for the purpose of determining (1) the degree to which the Spirit is present in Colossians and (2) whether or not there is correspondence between the pneumatological content of the undisputed Pauline writings and that of Colossians. This analysis leads the study to conclude that, while pneumatology features less prominently in Colossians than in the undisputed Pauline writings, it is not altogether absent from it. Rather the Spirit is present in four explicit (Col 1:8, 9; 2:5; 3:16) and many implicit references (of which only seven are presented) that have deep linguistic and conceptual connections to the pneumatological content in the undisputed Pauline writings.
International Institute of Historiography, 2024
Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, Santa Cruz, Madeira, Portugal, 18-20 September 2024., 2024
Мовна освіта в сучасних ЗВО: тенденції, виклики, перспективи, 2021
American Journal of Botany, 2009
Revista Rosa, 2020
International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2020
Pacific Conservation Biology, 2023
Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, regionovedenie, meždunarodnye otnošeniâ, 2024
Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2020
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 2023
Proceedings of the Eighth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing - ICVGIP '12, 2012
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2018
European Polymer Journal, 2012
Journal of Environmental Management, 2014
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2012