Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Renal function after liver transplantation

2001, Transplantation Proceedings

AI-generated Abstract

The study investigates renal function in liver transplant recipients over 5 years, revealing significant post-transplant decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). An initial 25% reduction in GFR occurs within the first year, followed by a steady decline. Despite low-dose immunosuppressive therapy, many patients exhibit reduced GFR, suggesting a growing concern for end-stage kidney disease. The findings emphasize the necessity of accurate GFR monitoring and the potential need for less nephrotoxic immunosuppressive strategies.

Renal Function After Liver Transplantation L. Bäckman, M. Olausson, L. Mjörnstedt, G. Herlenius, and S. Friman L IVER failure, acute and chronic, is commonly associated with some degree of renal dysfunction. In selected patients, a combined kidney and liver transplantation is indicated. Hepatorenal syndrome is a controversial diagnosis that most commonly reverses after liver transplantation (Ltx). It is well known that Ltx recipients lose 25% to 50% of their glomerular filtration the first posttransplant year.2– 4 With improving long-term results after Ltx, it is important to analyze the long-term renal function with accurate methods to define the risk for development of end-stage renal disease and eventual need for dialysis treatment or renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the degree of renal impairment in liver transplant recipients up to 5 years posttransplant. PATIENT AND METHODS Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured in a cohort of 30 liver transplant recipients. The indications for Ltx were primary biliary cirrhosis in 12, chronic active hepatitis in 7, sclerosing cholangitis in 6, and “other” in 5 patients. The GFR was analyzed in all patients pretransplant and 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years posttransplant using single injection Cr EDTA clearence injection.1 The immunosuppressive regimen was sequential quadruple with antithymocyte globuline induction (Thymoglobuline 5 mg/kg) for the first 5 to 7 posttransplant days. Cyclosporine was introduced at a dose of 4 mg Po bid when the renal function had stabilized, most typically at day 5 to 7 posttransplant. The cyclosporine dosing was then concentration controlled aiming for cyclosporine whole-blood levels (12 hour trough) of 200 ng/mL the first year and then 100 to 150 ng/mL. Azathioprine was given at a dose of 2 mg/kg PO daily. A prednisolone taper was also given. Table 2. Cyclosporine Levels Posttransplant in 30 Liver Transplant Recipients Posttransplant 3 1 3 5 Cyclosporine Level (ng/mL)* months year years years 193 ⫾ 15 119 ⫾ 9 128 ⫾ 9 122 ⫾ 9 * Whole blood 12-hour trough levels. m2 (25%) during the first posttransplant year. The annual decline in GFR thereafter was 2.8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (4.4%). Cyclosporine levels from 3 months to 5 years posttransplant are shown in Table 2. The serum creatinine levels are compared to GFR in Table 3 in patients with a normal or slightly elevated serum creatinine level (⬍150 umol/L) 5 years posttransplant. DISCUSSION There was a continous reduction in GFR during the first 5 years after Ltx (Table 1). This in spite of the “low dose” cyclosporine regimen, as seen in Table 2. The yearly decline in GFR was almost 5% after the first posttransplant year. There are no reasons to believe that the renal function should stabilize after 5 years but rather that this decline will continue. Thus, end-stage kidney disease secondary to Ltx will become an increasing problem with improving longterm results after liver transplantation. It is also important to not just monitor the serum creatinine levels. GFR measurements are mandatory to get an accurate analysis of the renal function. A majority (64%) of patients with RESULTS The serum creatinine levels and GFRs are presented in Table 1. There was a continous decline in renal function with the largest reduction the first 3 posttransplant months. The GFR was reduced by a mean of 21.3 mL/min per 1.73 From the Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Address reprint requests to Lars Bäckman, MD, PhD, Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 46 Gothenburg, Sweden. Table 1. Levels of Serum Creatinine and Glomular Filtration Rate in 30 Liver Transplant Recipients S-cr* GFR** Pretransplant 3 Months Posttransplant 1 Year Posttransplant 3 Years Posttransplant 5 Years Posttransplant 77 ⫾ 6 87 ⫾ 4 106 ⫾ 5 64 ⫾ 3 105 ⫾ 6 64 ⫾ 4 111 ⫾ 6 57 ⫾ 3 132 ⫾ 8 52 ⫾ 3 * Serum creatinine level (umol/L). ** Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min per 1.73 m2). 0041-1345/01/$–see front matter PII S0041-1345(01)02483-6 © 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. 655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 3442 Transplantation Proceedings, 33, 3442–3443 (2001) RENAL FUNCTION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANT 3443 Table 3. Serum Creatinine Levels and Glomular Filtration Rates 5 Years Posttransplant in Liver Recipients With a Serum Creatinine Level <150 umol/L Glomular Filtration Rate Level (mL/min per 1.73 m2) ⬍60 ⬍50 ⬍40 N (%) 16/25 (64%) 7/25 (28%) 5/25 (20%) normal or a slightly elevated creatinine (⬍150 umol/L) had a significantly reduced GFR (⬍60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) (Table 3). Many factors may contribute to the reduction in GFR, but immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine is a significant contributor, this in spite of a low dose regimen used at our center. In conclusion, there is a progressive deterioration in renal function in liver transplant recipients after 1 year, and there is a need for nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressive protocols to prevent the development of renal failure in these patients.5 REFERENCES 1. Brochner-Mortensen J: Clin Physiol 5:1, 1985 2. McDiarmid S, Ettenger RB, Hawkins RA, et al: Transplantation 49:81, 1990 3. Poplawski SC, Gonwa TA, Goldstein R, et al: Clin Transplantation 3:94, 1989 4. Dagöö T, Bäckman L, Mjörnstedt L, et al: Transplant Proc 29:3116, 1997 5. Groth CG, Bäckman L, Kreis H, et al: Transplantation 7:1036, 1999