Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021, Journal of Multidisciplinary Research at Trent
…
3 pages
1 file
The Red Deal by The Red Nation and Red Media is a short but powerful political manifesto which offers readers a choice: climate extinction, or true, meaningful, and complete decolonization. With less than thirty years to reduce the earth's carbon each word, comas separating each emissions to net zero, The Red Deal emphasizes that we cannot expect current oppressive structures such as capitalism, settler-colonialism, and imperialism to reverse the effects of climate change which were ultimately caused and worsened by their operation on these lands.
REDD stands for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, and is a mechanism through which poor countries who are able to reduce emissions from deforestation are financially compensated by rich countries. 1 SLIDE Since 2005, when REDD was formally introduced in global climate negotiations, the mechanism has undergone numerous changes, but in 2010, it was definitely established by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) as one of the main tools to achieve large scale emissions reductions. In this presentation, I will explore key moments of denial related to REDD to argue that such moments are less about implementation failures (or even efforts to conceal those failures) than they are about the possibility of using REDD to subtly expand transnational power over poor countries. More specifically, those moments of denial occur through the simplification and translation of carbon, and rhetorical erasure of REDD, which together enable the repackaging of old forms of " development " and the expansion of transnational governance. SLIDE ! Initially defined as a market mechanism, in which financial compensations for reduced emissions would be calculated on the basis of the amount of carbon captured per unit of forest, REDD has progressively become a mechanism of compensation in exchange for evidence of reduced deforestation. The scope of REDD has changed too, gradually including other indicators such as social benefits and poverty reduction. These changes occurred in part because poor countries accused REDD of being a capitalist instrument of commodifying nature, 2 generating social conflicts, 3 land grabbing, 4 environmental injustice, 5 and carbon colonialism. 6 SLIDE REDD has thus been contentious since its beginning, and invoking it by name is almost sure to trigger suspicion, criticism and at times, conflict.
2010
Although it may be easy to forget, forests affect everyone. Forests, particularly in the tropics, provide a home for millions of people, support 80% of the world’s terrestrial biodiversity, and drive many of the earth’s local and global climatic and hydrological cycles. Forests also seriously contribute to climate change when they are cut down. In fact, deforestation and forest degradation activities emit more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than the entire global transportation sector. Unfortunately, the increasing demand for agriculture and timber products, among others, requires the land that forests occupy, which in turn drives deforestation. This especially rings true in developing countries, where land-use changes are often associated with economic development. Recognizing the crucial role that trees play in climate change mitigation, in 2009 the international community presented the Copenhagen Accord at the 15th session of the Conference of Parties (the decision-making bod...
To their advocates, green-economy principles offer the best hope for overcoming a global 'triple crisis' of subsistence (hunger and extreme poverty), environmental degradation (global warming and species loss), and economic stagnation (Gills 2010; IMF 2012). In short, green economy is a strategy to save globalized capitalism from its most ecologically and socially destructive consequences by constructing markets in environmental assets and deficits. This, it is said, will benefit investors and society as well as nature, thus helping to circumvent the financing short-falls, conflicts of interest, and political disputes that have blocked progress on climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation. Carbon-offset markets are one of the most vigorously promoted green-economy policies (World Bank 2012). This chapter considers critiques of carbon markets as a conservation-and-development strategy with emphasis on the problem of inequality, international political dissent ab...
2019
This is the final revision of my talk at the ASU conference, 'The Green New Deal and the Future of Work in America,' after many conversations and several public presentations. I argue the climate movement needs to shift from a "resistance" and gloom and doom narrative to a positive vision of transformation.
Climatic Change, 2010
With the increasing perception that catastrophic climate change is not just a wild figment of the imagination but a very real possibility, governments and policy makers are searching desperately for effective solutions that are palatable enough to be sold to their electorates. It is not surprising then that a new policy in discussion under the UNFCCC, REDD (Reduced Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries), by which reductions in emissions related to deforestation in tropical countries would be rewarded through valuation of the carbon saved, has been embraced with enthusiasm by a wide range of Parties, official observers and the general public (Economist 2009). REDD has already expanded somewhat, now also including forest enhancement, sustainable forest management and forest conservation, under the rubric REDD+. This seems to be an all round winner: cheap carbon reductions (as evidenced by the well-received report of the Stern Commission (2007)), with multiple additional environmental benefits, requiring forest policies and management measures selected by each participating country in line with its own long run objectives for forest management and conservation, and with the potential for participation and benefit sharing by a large number of developing countries and local stakeholders. Although they are still contesting the details of how it should be operationalised and rewarded, many environmental organizations are on board, having jettisoned their earlier doubts about including forest related projects in the international climate agreements. The EU, which does not permit credits from CDM forestry projects within its trading system, is supportive of the idea of REDD+ although still very cautious about a full fledged market-based credit system in the short term.
RSC Advances, 2017
Physical review applied, 2023
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2009
Critical Perspectives on Activity
Plant Archives/Plant archives, 2024
Revista de Filosofía. Universidad Iberoamericana, 2008
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, 2017
Iranian Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 2019
https://www.google.com/search?q=vaste+programme&rlz=1C1GCEA_enCA814CA814&oq=&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCQgBECMYJxjqAjIJCAAQLhgnGOoCMgkIARAjGCcY6gIyCQgCECMYJxjqAjIJCAMQIxgnGOoCMgkIBBAjGCcY6gIyCQgFECMYJxjqAjIJCAYQIxgnGOoCMgkIBxAjGCcY6gLSAQkzNTQwajBqMTWoAgiwAgE&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Nepalese journal of insurance and social security, 2024
Проблемы истории и археологии Украины, 2014
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), 2013
Mitra Mahajana: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2021