Beinamputierter Mars - Archäologie in Deutschland 02 2022

Otto, A./Kaniuth, K. (Hrsg.), 50 Jahre Vorderasiatische Archäologie in München, 2022

Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen National bibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar.

Proceedings of International ICOMOS Symposium in Hamburg, October 14--17, 2008., 2009

With contributions by Frank Pieter Hesse, Michael Petzet, Anna Sidorenko-Dulom, Rajesh Kochhar, Viktor K. Abalakin, Suzanne Débarbat, Pedro Chalbaud, Peter Müller, Pedro Raposo, Christophe Benoist, Gaye Danisan, Füsun Limboz, Marcus Granato, James Caplan, Anneliese Schnell, Lajos G. Balázs, Magda Vargha, Endre Zsoldos, Magda Stavinschi, Catalin Mosoia, Gloria Clifton, Reet Mägi, Juan Carlos Forte, Sofia A. Cora, Françoise Le Guet Tully, Hamid Sadsaoud, Ian S. Glass, Brian Mason, Jean Davoigneau, Ileana Chinnici, Martin Solc, Inga Elmqvist Söderlund, Shylaja B. S., Vidar Enebakk, Bjørn Ragnvald Pettersen, Matthias Hünsch, Ruth Keller-Kempas, Beatrix Alscher, Björn Kunzmann, Peter Kroll, Rudolf Kippenhahn, Dieter Reimers, Henry Schlepegrell. From October 14 to 17, 2008 the international ICOMOS symposium about “Cultural Heritage of Astronomical Observatories (around 1900) – From Classical Astronomy to Modern Astrophysic” took place, organized and chaired by Gudrun Wolfschmidt, head of the Institute for History of Science o f Hamburg University, in cooperation with ICOMOS Germany and the Monument Protection Office (Denkmalschutzamt) Hamburg together with Hamburg University (Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences, Hamburg Observatory and Institute for History of Science and Technology). It counted as the first event in the context of the International Year of Astronomy (IYA) 2009 in Hamburg. The objective of the ICOMOS symposium was to discuss the relevance of modern observatories for the cultural heritage of mankind. On the UNESCO World Heritage List buildings of science are currently underrepresented. The discussion about “Astronomy and World Heritage” had already started in 2004 in order to establish a link between science and culture and to raise awareness of the cultural importance of astronomical sites. In October 2008 a Memorandum of Understanding between UNESCO and the International Astronomical Union (IAU) was signed. Guests from 20 countries discussed in Hamburg the cultural heritage of observatories and presented their papers which described in detail the history of the buildings, the architectural features, the valuable instruments and the archive material of the observatories as well as the scientific achievements, inventions and discoveries. It turned out that some more research has to be done in order to get an analysis of the architectural relevance of the observatories and their urbanistic disposition, as well as an evaluation of the inherent artistic and aesthetic values. I would like to thank very much for the help in organizing the ICOMOS symposium – first of all Ilka von Bodungen and Frank Pieter Hesse, Monument Protection Office (Denkmalschutzamt) Hamburg, but also the the collegues of the Institute for History of Science, Hamburg University, Hamburg Observatory and the Förderverein Hamburger Sternwarte. Finally, the ICOMOS symposium would not have been possible without the generous financial support from the following institutions and sponsors:  Behörde für Kultur, Sport und Medien der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg  Behörde für Wissenschaft und Forschung der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg  Hamburg University  Senatskanzlei Hamburg  Bezirksamt Hamburg-Bergedorf  Bergedorfer Zeitung  Körber-Stiftung  Buhck-Stiftung. Concerning the proceedings I am very grateful to Prof. Dr. Michael Petzet for his advice and suggestions and to Timo Engels for the amount of help in improving the layout according to the ICOMOS publication regulations. Gudrun Wolfschmidt

2012

The past and the public History and monuments in the Aristotelous Axis, Thessaloniki (Greece) ■ Michał Pawleta The past in the present The case of the ancient stone rings in Pomerania (Poland) ■ Nicole Rodrigues Saint-Denis, archaeology, territory and citizenship (Archéologie, territoire et citoyenneté) Assessment and prospects ■ Raimund Karl The public? Which public? ■ Cath Neal Community archaeology in the UK Setting the agenda ■ Gerhard Ermischer Digging up history A case study from the Spessart (Germany) ■ Xurxo M. Ayán Vila Public archaeology, democracy and community Experiences from Iron Age hillforts at Galicia (Spain) ■ Monique H. van den Dries and Sjoerd J. van der Linde Collecting oral histories for the purpose of stimulating community involvement at Tell Balata (Palestine) ■ Karl-Friedrich Rittershofer Volunteering and fundraising Excavations in the Dünsberg oppidum in the vicinity of Gießen (Germany) ■ Daniel Burger and Sabine Kuhlmann Opportunities and limitations Working within an association as a way to support postgraduates ■ Sylvie Jérémie Indigenous people of the American French Territory (the case of French Guiana) Processes and dynamics of identity construction through archaeology ■ Integrating archaeology: different approaches ■ Stefanie Samida Reenacted prehistory today Preliminary remarks on a multidisciplinary research project ■ Birgit Jaeckel Archaeological story-telling Facts in fiction

2007

MundoGEO, 2013

The influence of geotechnologies in the so-called Earth sciences can be widely felt in many scientific works and projects developed by companies. The possibilities for the use of these tools in geography, geology, environment and so many others, is a reality and tend to expand. However, this may not be a reality as visible when it comes

2021

Rezension zu: Dieter Lammers, Kloster Lorsch – Die archäologischen Untersuchungen der Jahre 2010-2016. Klostermauer, Spittelsberg, Klausurgebäude, Klostergelände. Schriften zum Kloster Lorsch volume 1. Verlag Schnell & Steiner, Regensburg 2018. ISBN 978-3-7954-3269-0 (Hardcover). 336 pages with 376 illustrations, mostly in colour

The full title of the MARS Project is the Monuments at Risk Survey. This project is funded by English Heritage, the national body responsible for archaeology in England. In response to a number of studies carried out during the 1980s which underlined the need for quantified, nationwide information IAM 1984; RCHME 1993), this three-year project was commissioned to undertake a large-scale, but rapid, survey of the condition and potential of England's archaeological resource. The purpose is to establish a baseline for the future. The results may stimulate work on national and regional scales to identify further the threats to England's archaeology, and to develop cultural resource management techniques. MARS is not an attempt to identify particular monuments under extreme threats, nor is it an attempt to identify particular areas under special risk. MARS is attempting to understand the national picture, the range of threats, the impact on groups of monument classes; for example, what proportion of upland sites are threatened by changes in agricultural activity; and whether prehistoric sites are being greatly affected by urban growth.

Hrsg. v. der Europäischen Vereinigung zur Förderung der Experimentellen Archäologie.

Science, 2005

Mars was most active during its first billion years. The core, mantle, and crust formed within È50 million years of solar system formation. A magnetic dynamo in a convecting fluid core magnetized the crust, and the global field shielded a more massive early atmosphere against solar wind stripping. The Tharsis province became a focus for volcanism, deformation, and outgassing of water and carbon dioxide in quantities possibly sufficient to induce episodes of climate warming. Surficial and near-surface water contributed to regionally extensive erosion, sediment transport, and chemical alteration. Deep hydrothermal circulation accelerated crustal cooling, preserved variations in crustal thickness, and modified patterns of crustal magnetization.