INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
Published online 22 March 2007 in Wiley InterScience
(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/joc.1492
Precipitation in Nepal between 1987 and 1996
Kimpei Ichiyanagi,a* Manabu D. Yamanaka,b Yoshitaka Murajic and Bijaya Kumar Vaidyad
a
Institute of Observational Research for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15 Natsushima-cho,
Yokosuka-city, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan
b Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
c EnergySharing Co. Ltd., 2-5-23 Toride, Toride 302-0004, Japan
d Meteorological Forecasting Division, Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, Tribhuvan International Airport, Kathmandu, Nepal
Abstract:
Rain gauge station data from 1987 to 1996 were used to investigate spatial and temporal variability in monthly precipitation
and annual and seasonal precipitation patterns over Nepal. Maximum annual precipitation increased with altitude for
elevations below 2000 m but decreased for elevations of 2000–3500 m. The data revealed a negative relationship
between annual precipitation and elevation only in western Nepal. Annual precipitation averaged on a 0.25° grid exceeded
3000 mm/yr in central Nepal but was less than 1000 mm/yr over Nepal’s northwestern mountains. Only winter precipitation
over western Nepal was heavier than precipitation over central and eastern Nepal. A time series of standardized precipitation
anomalies averaged over Nepal revealed no significant long-term trends. Further, almost no stations exhibited significant
long-term trends by Kendall’s rank correlation analysis. A correlation analysis between summer monsoon precipitation and
the All Indian Rainfall (AIR) index revealed positive and negative correlations in western and eastern Nepal, respectively.
This analysis also revealed a positive correlation, but no negative correlation, between summer monsoon precipitation
and the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) in western and eastern Nepal. Composite differences in temperature, 850-hPa
winds, outgoing longwave radiation (OLR), and precipitation rates between low and high AIR phases revealed that moist
air from the Arabian Sea supported precipitation over western Nepal, whereas cold dry air from the Tibetan Plateau
suppressed precipitation over eastern Nepal. However, composite differences in precipitation between low and high SOI
phases revealed no anomalies for Nepal. Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
KEY WORDS
Asian summer monsoon; long-term trend; Nepal; orographic effect; precipitation
Received 8 June 2005; Revised 8 June 2006; Accepted 4 December 2006
INTRODUCTION
Located between the Indian plains and the high Himalayan mountains, Nepal is characterized by steep, complex topography that makes meteorological observations
difficult. Numerous studies have investigated characteristics of the Indian monsoon (e.g., Hahn and Shukla,
1976; Parthasarathy et al., 1991; Meehl, 1994; Yang and
Lau, 1998; Webster et al., 1998) and its connection to
El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) (e.g., Webster and
Yang, 1992; Ailikun and Yasunari, 2001; Wang and Fan,
1999; Lang and Barros, 2004). However, only few studies have examined the spatial and temporal variability
of precipitation over Nepal, and most of the rain gauges
in Nepal’s mountainous areas are located at valley bottoms (Lang and Barros, 2002). Consequently, precipitation variability over Nepal remains poorly understood.
* Correspondence to: Kimpei Ichiyanagi, Institute of Observational
Research for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science
and Technology, 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka-city, Kanagawa 2370061, Japan. E-mail:
[email protected]
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
Few researchers have investigated the local-scale precipitation patterns in central Nepal because of the difficulty of conducting studies in this mountainous area.
Barros et al. (2000) examined rainfall in a mountainous area of Nepal, comparing monsoon rainfall measured
using rain gauges to Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite-derived data. They produced a
three-dimensional profile of radar-measured rain rates and
discussed the interactions between mesoscale convective
systems and steep terrain at elevations of 1–2 km. Barros
and Lang (2003) compared precipitation data observed
during the Monsoon Himalayan Precipitation Experiment
to data extracted from a global atmospheric reanalysis
data set and found that the reanalysis data severely underestimated precipitation.
A few studies have investigated how the monsoon and
ENSO affect large-scale precipitation patterns. Shrestha
(2000) analyzed precipitation at 78 stations throughout
Nepal and compared the temporal variability in precipitation to climatological parameters over Nepal. Their study
revealed a significant relationship between precipitation
and the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), i.e., precipitation was lighter in Nepal when the SOI was low. Lang
1754
K. ICHIYANAGI ET AL.
and Barros (2002) examined the onset of monsoon in
central Nepal in 1999 and 2000 and found that the onset
was associated with monsoon depressions in the Bay
of Bengal. Kansakar et al. (2004) used data gathered
from 222 stations over Nepal to derive climatological
patterns of monthly precipitation, classifying regimes by
the shape and magnitude of monthly precipitation. They
found that precipitation patterns were controlled by the
summer monsoon and by orographic effects induced by
the mountain ranges.
In this study we investigated spatial distributions of
annual and seasonal precipitation, orographic effects, and
long-term trends to improve understanding of how the
Indian summer monsoon and ENSO affect precipitation
over Nepal.
meridional), and precipitation rate data at 2.5° × 2.5° resolution. In this study, these reanalysis data were used to
calculate circulation anomalies and indices. We also computed several indices relevant to precipitation over Nepal
and to monsoon circulation. The All Indian Rainfall
(AIR) index measures monthly averaged precipitation
over India. The Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology
provided homogeneous Indian monthly rainfall data sets,
and the Climate Prediction Center provided the monthly
averaged SOI, defined as the difference between pressures at sea level at Tahiti and Darwin.
Precipitation and meteorological indices for Nepal
were defined by deviations from monthly averages over
the entire period (1987–1996). All data were normalized
using their standard deviation.
DATA SETS
RESULTS
The main data used in this study were amounts of
monthly precipitation measured at 274 rain gauge stations throughout Nepal from 1987 to 1996. Precipitation amounts observed at these stations were extracted
from data books published by His Majesty’s Government
of Nepal, Department of Hydrology and Meteorology
(DHM, 1992, 1997, 1999). We used the data for a specific
station only if data were available for more than 80% of
the entire period.
The National Centers for Environmental Prediction/
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/
NCAR) global atmospheric reanalysis data set (Kalnay
et al., 1996) includes surface temperature, outgoing
longwave radiation (OLR), 850-hPa winds (zonal and
Precipitation in relation to elevation
Some previous studies of the Himalayas have considered orographic effects on precipitation (Singh et al.,
1995; Singh and Kumar, 1997). Therefore, we examined
the variability of precipitation with elevation. Figure 1
presents the locations of rain gauge stations in Nepal.
Station elevations range from 70 to 4100 m, and many
stations are concentrated in central Nepal. We calculated
the average annual precipitation for individual rain gauge
stations and also partitioned the station data into 500-m
elevation bins. Figure 2 presents the average annual precipitation and the number of stations per specific 500-m
elevation increments. More than 35 stations are located
at elevations between 1500 and 2000 m, and fewer than
Rain–gauge stations in Nepal
30.5N
30N
29.5N
29N
28.5N
28N
27.5N
27N
26.5N
26N
80E
81E
82E
83E
100
84E
1000
85E
3000
86E
87E
88E
89E
5000
Figure 1. Rain gauge stations of Nepal. Crosses and open circles indicate stations located below and above elevations of 3000 m, respectively.
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc
1755
PRECIPITATION IN NEPAL BETWEEN 1987 AND 1996
6000
Prec. (mm/yr)
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
num. stations
100
80
60
40
20
0
elevation (m)
Figure 2. Annual precipitation and the number of stations in 500-m elevation bins over Nepal. Maximum, mean, and minimum annual
precipitations are shown in the upper panel.
Precipitation (mm/yr)
(a) Western (80–82)
(b) Central (83–85)
(c) Eastern (86–88)
6000
6000
6000
5000
5000
5000
4000
4000
4000
3000
3000
3000
2000
2000
2000
1000
1000
1000
0
0
1000 2000 3000 4000
elevation (m)
0
0
1000 2000 3000 4000
elevation (m)
0
0
1000 2000 3000 4000
elevation (m)
Figure 3. Relationships between annual precipitation and elevation divided into western (80 ° E–83 ° E), central (83 ° E–86 ° E), and eastern
(86 ° E–89 ° E) Nepal.
10 stations are located between 2500 and 4000 m. Only
one station is above 4000 m. Annual precipitation over
10 years (1987–1996) was averaged for each station.
Maximum annual precipitation increased linearly with
altitude from 3000 to 5500 mm/yr for elevations below
2000 m, and decreased to 1000 mm/yr for elevations
above 2000 m. Mean annual precipitation was almost
2000 mm/yr below 3000 m. Singh and Kumar (1997)
summarized the orographic effects found in previous
studies. Some studies found maximum precipitation at
2000–2500 m and a subsequent decrease with elevation.
Figure 3 presents the relationships between annual
precipitation and elevation divided into three regions:
western (80 ° E–82 ° E), central (83 ° E–85 ° E), and eastern
(86 ° E–88 ° E) Nepal. A negative relationship was found
only for western Nepal, where precipitation decreased by
100 mm for 500-m elevation increments. The correlation
coefficient was approximately 0.4, indicating statistical
significance. In western Nepal, maximum value was
below 2500 mm/yr, whereas central and eastern Nepal
had maximum values of approximately 5000 mm/yr. In
central Nepal, maximum values increased and minimum
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
values decreased below 2000 m. Precipitation ranged
from 1000 to 3000 mm/yr for elevations below 3000 m
in eastern Nepal.
Spatial distribution
Station data from 1987 to 1996 were averaged on a grid
with a horizontal resolution of 0.25° in both longitude
and latitude to examine the spatial distribution of precipitation. Figure 4 presents the spatial distribution of mean
annual precipitation. Precipitation was relatively heavy
(more than 2000 mm/yr) over central Nepal and eastern Nepal near Bhutan. Kansakar et al. (2004) described
zones of heavy precipitation near Pokhara and northeast
of the Kathmandu Valley. Annual precipitation was less
than 1000 mm/yr in northwestern Nepal, where elevations exceed 3000 m. Most of Nepal had an average
annual precipitation of 1000–2000 mm/yr.
Figure 5 presents the spatial distribution of seasonal
precipitation data composed of monthly precipitation
averaged over three months. The four seasons include
winter (December to February), pre-monsoon (March to
May), monsoon (June to August), and post-monsoon
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc
1756
K. ICHIYANAGI ET AL.
Annual Precipitation (mm/year)
30.5N
5000
5000
30N
3000
5000
29.5N
5000
5000
5000
5000
29N
1000
5000
5000
5000
28.5N
5000
3000
1000
28N
500
27.5N
5000
100
3000
27N
1000
100
26.5N
26N
80E
81E
82E
83E
1000
84E
1500
85E
2000
86E
87E
88E
89E
3000
Figure 4. Annual precipitation in Nepal averaged from 1987 to 1996. This figure is available in colour online at www.interscience.wiley.com/ijoc
(September to November). Figure 6 presents seasonal
wind and precipitation features revealed by NCEP/NCAR
reanalysis data. Horizontal and meridional winds and
precipitation rates were averaged over the same period
(from 1987 and 1996). In winter, total monthly precipitation exceeded 40 mm/month over western Nepal but was
less than 20 mm/month over eastern Nepal. Figure 5(a)
illustrates clearly that precipitation over western Nepal
was heavier than precipitation over central and eastern
Nepal only in winter. Figure 6(a) shows that a westerly
wind dominated over the area north of latitude 25° N and
that precipitation rates exceeded 50 mm/month in northwestern Nepal along the Himalayan range. In contrast,
western Nepal had less precipitation than central and
eastern Nepal during the pre-monsoon, monsoon, and
post-monsoon seasons. During these seasons, a strong
southwesterly wind from the Bay of Bengal supplied
heavy precipitation to Nepal.
Figure 5(b) shows that in the pre-monsoon season, the
western region of Nepal had less than 50 mm/month of
precipitation, while the central and eastern areas had more
than 50 mm/month. As shown in Figure 6(b), a westerly
wind dominated over the area of latitude 25° N–30° N,
and the precipitation rate was more than 50 mm/month
in northwestern Nepal in the pre-monsoon season. The
precipitation rate was also greater than 100 mm/month in
areas east of Nepal and Bangladesh. During the monsoon
season, total precipitation exceeded 200 mm/month in all
areas except northwest Nepal, as shown in Figure 5(c).
Precipitation exceeded 800 mm/month at only two grids
in central and eastern Nepal. As illustrated in Figure 6(c),
a strong westerly wind dominated the area south of latitude 20° N during the summer monsoon season, from
the Arabian Sea to the Bay of Bengal through the
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
Indian subcontinent. Precipitation rates were more than
300 mm/month over the west coast of India and more
than 400 mm/month over western Nepal and the west
coast of Myanmar. During the post-monsoon season,
precipitation was less than 100 mm/month over western Nepal and more than 100 mm/month over central
and eastern Nepal, as shown in Figure 5(d). Even though
Nepal has a zone of divergence, the precipitation rate
was still over 50 mm/month in southern Nepal, as shown
in Figure 6(d). Precipitation over the mountains of northwest Nepal was less than 200 mm/month during the monsoon season (Figure 5(c)) and less than 50 mm/yr during
the post-monsoon season (Figure 5(d)).
Kansakar et al. (2004) classified long-term mean precipitation data for specific stations by shape and magnitude. Their results indicated that July–August peaks were
typical over western Nepal, that central Nepal had heavier precipitation, and that weather systems in the west
supplied winter precipitation to the mountains of northwestern Nepal.
The annual and seasonal precipitation patterns found
in the current study resemble the results of previous
studies (e.g., Chalise et al., 2003; Kansakar et al., 2004).
However, this is the first study to reveal a local maximum
precipitation over western Nepal in winter.
DISCUSSION
Long-term trends
To examine long-term trends of precipitation in Nepal,
standardized anomalies in monthly precipitation for
all grid data were averaged for 1987–1996. Figure 7
presents the time series of precipitation anomalies
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc
PRECIPITATION IN NEPAL BETWEEN 1987 AND 1996
Precipitation (mm/month)
30.5N
30N
DJF
29.5N
29N
28.5N
28N
27.5N
27N
26.5N
26N
(a)
80E 81E 82E 83E 84E 85E 86E 87E 88E 89E
30.5N
30N
MAM
29.5N
29N
28.5N
28N
27.5N
27N
26.5N
26N
(b)
80E 81E 82E 83E 84E 85E 86E 87E 88E 89E
30.5N
30N
JJA
29.5N
29N
28.5N
28N
27.5N
27N
26.5N
26N
(c)
80E 81E 82E 83E 84E 85E 86E 87E 88E 89E
30.5N
30N
SON
29.5N
29N
28.5N
28N
27.5N
27N
26.5N
26N
80E 81E 82E 83E 84E 85E 86E 87E 88E 89E
(d)
80
60
40
20
200
150
100
50
800
600
400
200
200
150
100
50
Figure 5. Seasonal precipitation in Nepal for (a) December–February,
(b) March–May, (c) June–August, and (d) September–November.
This figure is available in colour online at www.interscience.wiley.
com/ijoc
over Nepal but does not reveal any significant
long-term trends. Decreases occurred in 1990–1991 and
1993–1994, and increases occurred in 1992 and 1995.
Intra-seasonal variation was low in 1991–1994 but high
in 1987–1990 and 1995–1996. Shrestha et al. (2000)
analyzed all the precipitation records for Nepal for
1948–1994; their results also revealed no significant
long-term trends.
Standardized anomalies in monthly precipitation at
specific stations were also examined to test for longterm trends. Kendall’s rank correlation was used to test
for significance in observed trends; Figure 8 presents
stations with significant trends. Some stations in western
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
1757
and central Nepal showed an increase in precipitation;
one station in central Nepal was the only one to show
a decrease. Correlation coefficients at most stations
ranged from −0.2 to 0.2, and long-term trends were not
statistically significant.
Correlations with climatological indices
Many previous studies have related monsoon precipitation to ENSO (e.g., Webster and Yang, 1992; Ailikun
and Yasunari, 2001). Kawamura (1998) discussed the
indirect effects that both anomalous sea-surface temperature (SST) forcing and land–ocean thermal contrasts
associated with ENSO had on the Asian summer monsoon. Shrestha et al. (2000) showed a strong relationship
between precipitation over Nepal and the SOI in that
less precipitation fell over Nepal during the ENSO warm
phases. The relationship between the SOI and precipitation over Nepal was much stronger than the relationship between the SOI and AIR, especially after 1970.
We examined the relationship between precipitation over
Nepal during the summer monsoon season (from June
to September) and climatological indices (the AIR and
SOI). Correlation coefficients were calculated to relate
a standardized anomaly of monthly precipitation for a
specific station to the AIR and SOI. Figure 9 presents
stations with significant correlations. Most stations having positive correlation with the AIR were in western
Nepal, while a few stations in eastern Nepal were negatively correlated with the AIR, as shown in Figure 9(a).
Figure 9(b) shows that some stations in western and eastern Nepal were positively correlated with the SOI, but
none appeared to be negatively correlated.
A composite analysis was used to elucidate the largescale impact of the AIR and SOI. High-phase years for
the AIR were 1988, 1990, and 1994; low-phase years
were 1987, 1993, and 1994. High-phase years for the SOI
were 1988, 1989, and 1996; low-phase years were 1987,
1991, and 1992. Figures 10 and 11 show the differences
in surface temperature, 850-hPa winds, OLR, and precipitation rates between low and high phases for the AIR and
SOI, respectively. As shown in Figure 10(a), a negative
temperature anomaly was observed over the Indian subcontinent. Figure 10(b) shows that cyclonic circulation
over the Arabian Sea and the Indian subcontinent (centered at 25° N and 70 ° E) corresponded to a temperature
anomaly. Figure 10(c) indicates a negative OLR anomaly
observed over northern India, while Figure 10(d) shows
the positive precipitation rate observed over India and
western Nepal. The negative precipitation rate observed
over eastern Nepal corresponded to the northerly wind
anomaly (Figure 10(b)). These results suggest that moist
air transported from the Arabian Sea supports precipitation over western Nepal, whereas cold dry air from
the Tibetan Plateau suppresses precipitation over eastern Nepal. Therefore, monsoon precipitation over western
and eastern Nepal is positively and negatively correlated
with the AIR, respectively. Kripalani et al. (1996) also
noted that monthly rainfall changes over Kathmandu corresponded to rainfall variations over northern India.
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc
1758
K. ICHIYANAGI ET AL.
Prec. & UV850 (DJF)
Prec. & UV850 (JJA)
45N
45N
50
40N
40N
100
35N
35N
200
100
50
100
30N
100
30N
50
200
300
300
400
25N
25N
20N
20N
400
200
50
300
300
100
15N
15N
50
10N
100
150
50
100
300 400
10N
200
300
50
200
100
100
5N
50E 55E 60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E
5N
50E 55E 60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E
(a)
(c)
10
20
Prec. & UV850 (MAM)
Prec. & UV850 (SON)
45N
45N
50
40N
40N
50
35N
100
50
50
100
35N
150
30N
100
100
30N
50
100
150
50
150
25N
150
25N
100
20N
20N
200
200
250
15N
100
15N
250
250
200
200
10N
50
50
10N
300
300
150
50
100
250
5N
50E 55E 60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E
(b)
5N
50E 55E 60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E
(d)
8
6
Figure 6. Seasonal wind and precipitation rate in Nepal over the four periods (for periods see Figure 5).
Anomaly / STD
Nepal Precipitation (1987–1996)
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
−0.5
−1
−1.5
−2
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
Figure 7. Time series of standardized precipitation anomalies over Nepal.
In contrast, Figure 11(a) indicates no temperature
anomaly. Figure 11(b) shows that anomalies of both
northwesterly and southerly winds combined over the
Bay of Bengal into a strong westerly wind anomaly
over Indochina. Figure 11(c) and (d) present the anomalies of negative OLR and positive precipitation rates
observed over the Bay of Bengal and South China
Sea. In Nepal, however, no precipitation anomalies were
observed. Shrestha et al. (2000) found no good agreement
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
between precipitation fluctuations over Nepal and India.
When simultaneous correlations were performed in the
present study, the results indicated that correlation coefficients were low throughout Nepal. Ichiyanagi and
Yamanaka (2005) found that an anomaly in precipitation
for Bangkok in May was a response to the Niño 3 SST
anomaly in March. Lag–correlation analysis may yield a
better understanding of the relationship between ENSO
and the Asian monsoon.
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc
1759
PRECIPITATION IN NEPAL BETWEEN 1987 AND 1996
Long–term trend (kendall's Rank Test)
30.5N
5000
30N
5000
4000
3000
5000
29.5N
5000
5000
5000
5000
29N
1000
5000
4000
5000
5000
28.5N
2000
1000
4000
3000
5000
28N
500
27.5N
5000
4000
3000
2000
2000
27N
1000
26.5N
26N
80E
81E
82E
83E
84E
85E
86E
87E
88E
89E
Figure 8. Stations exhibiting increasing and decreasing trends by Kendall’s rank test. Open and closed circles indicate correlation coefficients of
more than 0.2 and less than −0.2, respectively.
(a) Correl. Monsoon Rainfall (JJAS) and AIR
30.5N
5000
30N
4000
3000
5000
29.5N
29N
5000
5000
5000
1000
5000
28.5N
5000
5000
4000
2000 3000
1000
28N
5000
4000
27.5N
2000
27N
5000
3000
1000
26.5N
26N
80E
81E
82E
83E
84E
85E
86E
87E
88E
89E
(b) Correl. Monsoon Rainfall (JJAS) and SOI
30.5N
5000
30N
4000
3000
5000
29.5N
29N
5000
5000
5000
1000
5000
28.5N
4000
2000 3000
1000
28N
5000
5000
5000
4000
27.5N
2000
27N
5000
3000
1000
26.5N
26N
80E
81E
82E
83E
84E
85E
86E
87E
88E
89E
Figure 9. Stations that correlated well with (a) All Indian Rainfall (AIR) and (b) Southern Oscillation Index (SOI). Solid (open) circles indicate
a positive (negative) correlation.
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc
1760
K. ICHIYANAGI ET AL.
(a) Diff. Temp. (AIR)
(c) Diff. OLR (AIR)
45N
45N
40N
40N
5
5
35N
35N
0
0
0
30N
0.5
−0.5
1
0
−1
−5
0
30N
−10
−15
25N
0.5
0
0
25N
−1
−20
20N
20N
−5
−15
−5
0
−10
−10
−5
15N
15N
−5
−0.5
0
0
10N
0
0
0
10N
0
5N
50E 55E 60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E
5N
50E 55E 60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E
−5
(b) Diff. UV850 (AIR)
(d) Diff. Prec. (AIR)
45N
45N
40N
40N
35N
35N
0
0
0
0
0
−30
30N
30N
25N
25N
20N
20N
60
30
0
0
0
30
0
0
30
15N
15N
10N
10N
0
0
5N
50E 55E 60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E
−30
0
−30
5N
50E 55E 60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E
2
Figure 10. Composite differences between low and high All Indian Rainfall (AIR) phases in (a) surface temperature, (b) 850-hPa winds,
(c) outgoing longwave radiation (OLR), and (d) precipitation rates during the monsoon season (June–September).
CONCLUSIONS
We statistically analyzed monthly precipitation data from
274 gauges in Nepal between 1987 and 1996 to determine
spatial and temporal variability in precipitation. More
than 35 stations were at elevations between 1500 and
2000 m, while fewer than 10 stations were above 2500 m.
Maximum annual precipitation increased from 3000 to
5000 mm/yr as elevation increased to 2000 m, and then
decreased to 1500 mm/yr at elevations from 2000 to
3500 m. A negative relationship was observed only in
western Nepal. Precipitation decreased by 100 mm for
specific 500-m elevations. Mean annual precipitation was
less than 1000 mm/yr over the mountains in northwestern Nepal and more than 3000 mm/yr in central Nepal.
Seasonal precipitation from December to February was
greater over western Nepal than eastern Nepal. In contrast, western Nepal was drier from March to November.
To investigate long-term trends in Nepal’s precipitation, we averaged the standardized anomalies of monthly
precipitation for all grid data from 1987 to 1996 and
examined the averages by applying Kendall’s rank correlation to specific stations. These analyses did not reveal
any general trends, although some stations in central and
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
eastern Nepal exhibited an increasing trend. One station
in central Nepal showed a decreasing trend.
We also investigated the relationships between precipitation during the summer monsoon and climatological
indices for specific months and for the entire observational period. Precipitation in western Nepal was positively correlated with the AIR, while precipitation in
eastern Nepal was negatively correlated. Monsoon precipitation in both western and eastern Nepal was positively correlated with the SOI. The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data were used to analyze composite differences in
temperature, 850-hPa winds, OLR, and precipitation rates
between low and high phases of the AIR. The results
indicated that moist air transported from the Arabian Sea
supports precipitation over western Nepal, whereas cold
dry air from the Tibetan Plateau suppresses precipitation
over eastern Nepal. With regard to the SOI, anomalies of
strong westerly winds, negative OLR, and positive precipitation rates were observed over the Bay of Bengal.
However, no precipitation anomalies were observed over
Nepal. Lag–correlation analysis is needed for a more
comprehensive investigation of how precipitation variability in Nepal is related to ENSO.
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc
1761
PRECIPITATION IN NEPAL BETWEEN 1987 AND 1996
(a) Diff. Temp. (SOI)
(c) Diff. OLR (SOI)
35N
35N
−0.5
0
30N
0
30N
25N
−5
0
0
0
0.5
0
5
25N
−5
−10
5
20N
20N
−10
0
15N
15N
−5
0
−5
−10
10N
0
0
10N
0
5
−5
10
5N
0
0
5N
5
10
EQ
EQ
15
5
5
20
0
5S
60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E 115E 120E
10
5S
60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E 115E 120E
−5
(b) Diff. UV850 (SOI)
(d) Diff. Prec. (SOI)
35N
35N
0
0
30N
30N
0
0
25N
25N
20N
20N
0
0
0
−30
30
30
60
90
120
−30
30
60
60 60
15N
15N
10N
10N
−60
0
30
60
30
−30
30
0
−30
30
0
−30
−30
5N
0
5N
−30
−30
EQ
EQ
−30
0
5S
60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E 115E 120E
0
30
−60
0
0
−30
5S
60E 65E 70E 75E 80E 85E 90E 95E 100E 105E 110E 115E 120E
3
Figure 11. Composite difference between low and high Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) phases in (a) surface temperature, (b) 850-hPa winds,
(c) outgoing longwave radiation (OLR), and (d) precipitation rates during the monsoon season (June–September).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the staff of Nepal’s Department of
Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM) for their cooperation
with the research and for providing the data books published by DHM. The Indian monthly rainfall data set and
the Global land 1-km base elevation data set were provided by the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology and
Climate Prediction Center and the National Geophysical
Data Center, respectively. This research was supported by
the Institute of Observational Research for Global Change
(IORGC) in FY 2001-2005.
REFERENCES
Ailikun B, Yasunari T. 2001. ENSO and Asian summer monsoon:
persistence and transitivity in the seasonal march. Journal of the
Meteorological Society of Japan 79(1): 145–159.
Barros AP, Lang TJ. 2003. Monitoring the monsoon in the Himalayas:
observations in central Nepal, June 2001. Monthly Weather Review
131: 1408–1427.
Barros AP, Joshi M, Putkonen J, Burbank DW. 2000. A study of the
1999 monsoon rainfall in a mountainous region in central Nepal
using TRMM products and rain gauge observations. Geophysical
Research Letters 27: 3683–3686.
Chalise SR, Kansakar SR, Rees G, Croker K, Zaidman M. 2003.
Management of water resources and low flow estimation for the
Himalayan basins of Nepal. Journal of Hydrology 282: 25–35.
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
DHM (Department of Hydrology and Meteorology). 1992. Precipitation
Records of Nepal (1987–1990), His Majesty’s Government of Nepal,
Kathmandu, Nepal.
DHM (Department of Hydrology and Meteorology). 1997. Precipitation
Records of Nepal (1991–1994), His Majesty’s Government of Nepal,
Kathmandu, Nepal.
DHM (Department of Hydrology and Meteorology). 1999. Precipitation
Records of Nepal (1995–1996), His Majesty’s Government of Nepal,
Kathmandu, Nepal.
Hahn DG, Shukla J. 1976. An apparent relationship between Eurasian
snow cover and Indian monsoon rainfall. Journal of the Atmospheric
Sciences 33: 2461–2462.
Ichiyanagi K, Yamanaka MD. 2005. Interannual variation of stable
isotopes in precipitation at Bangkok in response to El Niño Southern
Oscillation. Hydrological Processes 19: 3413–3423.
Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L,
Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M,
Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C,
Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D. 1996. The
NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society 77: 437–471.
Kansakar SR, Hannah DM, Gerraed J, Rees G. 2004. Spatial pattern
in the precipitation regime of Nepal. International Journal of
Climatology 24: 1645–1659.
Kawamura R. 1998. A possible mechanism of the Asian summer
monsoon–ENSO coupling. Journal of the Meteorological Society of
Japan 76(6): 1009–1027.
Kripalani RH, Inamdar S, Sontakke NA. 1996. Rainfall variability over
Bangladesh and Nepal: comparison and connections with features
over India. International Journal of Climatology 16: 689–703.
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc
1762
K. ICHIYANAGI ET AL.
Lang TJ, Barros AP. 2002. An investigation of the onsets of the 1999
and 2000 monsoons in central Nepal. Monthly Weather Review 130:
1299–1316.
Lang TJ, Barros AP. 2004. Winter storms in the Central Himalayas.
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 82(4): 829–844.
Meehl GA. 1994. Coupled land–ocean–atmosphere processes and
South Asian monsoon variability. Science 266(5183): 263–267.
Parthasarathy B, Kumar KR, Munot AA. 1991. Evidence of secular
variations in Indian monsoon rainfall–circulation relationships.
Journal of Climate 4: 927–938.
Shrestha ML. 2000. Interannual variation of summer monsoon rainfall
over Nepal and its relation to the Southern Oscillation Index.
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 75: 21–28.
Shrestha AB, Wake CP, Dibb JE, Mayewski PA. 2000. Precipitation
fluctuations in the Nepal Himalaya and its vicinity and relationship
with some large scale climatological parameters. International
Journal of Climatology 20: 317–327.
Singh P, Kumar N. 1997. Effect of orography on precipitation in the
western Himalayan region. Journal of Hydrology 199: 183–206.
Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society
Singh P, Ramasastri KS, Kumar N. 1995. Topographical influence of
precipitation distribution in different ranges of western Himalayas.
Nordic Hydrology 26: 259–284.
Wang B, Fan Z. 1999. Choice of South Asian Summer Monsoon
Indices, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 80:
629–638.
Webster PJ, Yang S. 1992. Monsoon and ENSO: selectively interactive
systems. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 118:
877–926.
Webster PJ, Magana VO, Palmer TN, Shukla J, Thomas RA, Yanai M,
Yasunari T. 1998. Monsoons: Processes, predictability and the
prospects for prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research 103: 14,
451–14, 510.
Yang S, Lau K-M. 1998. Influences of sea surface temperature and
ground wetness on Asian summer monsoon. Journal of Climate 11:
3230–3246.
Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1753–1762 (2007)
DOI: 10.1002/joc