arXiv:cond-mat/0211012v1 1 Nov 2002
Waves and energy in chiral nihility
Sergei Tretyakov, Igor Nefedov, Ari Sihvola,
Stanislav Maslovski, Constantin Simovski
Radio/Electromagnetics Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology
P.O. Box 3000, FIN–02015 HUT, Finland
Address for correspondence:
Sergei A. Tretyakov,
Radio Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology,
P.O. Box 3000, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland.
Fax: +358-9-451-2152
E-mail:
[email protected]
Abstract
A model for a chiral material in which both the permittivity and permeability
are equal to zero is discussed. Such a material is referred by us as a “chiral nihility”.
It is shown that this exotic material can be realized as a mixture of small helical
inclusions. Wave solutions and energy in such a medium are analyzed. It is shown
that an extraordinary wave in chiral nihility is a backward wave. Wave reflection
and refraction on a chiral nihility interface is also considered. It is shown that a
linearly polarized wave normally incident onto this interface produces the wave of
“standing phase” and the same wave in the case of oblique incidence causes two
refracted waves, one of them with an anomalous refraction.
October 22, 2018
1
1
Introduction
Recently, a lot of attention has been paid to composite materials which in certain frequency regions can be described by effective permittivity and permeability having negative real parts (or, approximately, by real negative material parameters). In this respect,
A. Lakhtakia conceptually considered two-phase mixtures of an ordinary isotropic material with positive material parameters and of a double negative material, such that the
effective parameters of the mixture become null. He introduced term “nihility” for such
medium, whose ǫ = 0, µ = 0 [1]. He also used this notion in a later paper [2] when discussing the concept of perfect lens proposed by J.B. Pendry [3]. Lakhtakia’s conclusion
was that nihility material is not physically realizable.
In this paper, we model a regular array of small chiral (or Ω-shaped) ideally conducting
particles and find out that at a certain frequency this system behaves as an effective media
with null-valued permittivity and permeability. Of course, in real physical situations
there will be nonzero imaginary parts of the material parameters due to absorption in
the particles. However, no waves can travel in nonchiral nihility media [1], since the field
equations reduce to the static ones.
Furthermore, in this paper, we will generalize the concept of nihility and introduce
a more general concept of chiral nihility composite materials. These materials can be
realized in a similar way as mixture with “ordinary” nihility. We have to add chiral
inclusions, for example, all of the same handedness. At the frequency where the real
parts of both permittivity and permeability become zeros, the chirality parameter is
nonzero, and, as we will demonstrate by a numerical example, the imaginary parts of
all the parameters can be rather small compared to the chirality parameter. In these
media, waves can propagate, and the material exhibits some very interesting properties.
In particular, double refraction takes place at an interface between free space and an
isotropic chiral nihility. A linearly polarized wave is split into two circularly polarized
once, and one if these two components suffers negative refraction, as in backward-wave
or double negative materials.
The constitutive relations for isotropic chiral media read [4]
√
D = ǫǫ0 E − jκ ǫ0 µ0 H
√
B = jκ ǫ0 µ0 E + µµ0 H
(1)
(2)
Chiral nihility media are, by definition, media with the material parameters satisfy, at a
certain frequency ω0 ,
ǫ = 0, µ = 0, κ 6= 0
(3)
Thus, the material relations reduce to
√
D = −jκ ǫ0 µ0 H
√
B = jκ ǫ0 µ0 E
(4)
(5)
The different electric and magnetic units call for a renormalization of the quantities when
there is magnetoelectric coupling. Also, to achieve a compact notation for the material
response analysis, a good technique is the six-vector notation with which the constitutive
2
parameters are contained in a material matrix M:
E
E
ǫ −jκ
cη0 D
=M
=
η0 H
η0 H
jκ µ
cB
(6)
in other words,
d = Me
(7)
where the fields and displacements now carry the same dimensions (V/m), and the material matrix components are dimensionless.1
2
Model of the material parameters of chiral nihility
Using the antenna model of canonical chiral particles that consist of a small loop connected
to a short wire dipole antennas [5] and the Maxwell Garnett mixing rule, we can calculate
the effective parameters of an isotropic array of chiral particles. In these calculations, we
assume that the array is regular, so that the scattering loss of the particles is suppressed
by the interaction field. The absorption loss has been taken into account by adding
appropriate real parts to the input impedances of the loop and wire portions of the
canonical chiral helix. The geometrical parameters have been chosen so that the real parts
of the permittivity and permeability become zero at the same frequency. The results of
these calculations are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The second picture is a blow-up near
the frequency of zero permittivity and permeability. The inclusion sizes are the following:
the arm length of the straight dipole l = 2.7 mm, the loop radius a = 2.45 mm, the wire
radius r0 = 0.25 mm. Wires are made of copper with conductivity σ = 5.8 · 107 S/m,
and the volume fraction is f = 0.2. The last value is defined by introducing imaginary
spheres of the minimum radius totally enclosing the helices.
As is obvious from the graphs in Figures 1 and 2, at the frequency equal to 6.38 GHz,
both the permittivity and permeability of the material have zero real parts. The chirality
parameter is about 0.7 at the frequency. The imaginary parts are rather small compared
with the chirality parameter near this frequency and we will neglect them in the following
analysis. In passing, let us note that a racemic arrangement of the same particles gives
a nihility material with ǫ = 0, µ = 0, and κ = 0. Therefore, not only nihility medium is
possible but also a material displaying chiral nihility.
Let us next move on to study theoretical limitations for the material parameters in
complicated media.
3
Material parameter restrictions
The limitation for material parameters in lossless chiral media are [4]
κ2 ≤ ǫµ
(8)
p
√
1
The coefficients in the renormalization are the vacuum constants c = 1/ ǫ0 µ0 and η0 = µ0 /ǫ0 .
3
80
Re(eps)
Im(eps)
Re(mu)
Im(mu)
Re(kappa)
Im(kappa)
60
Relative material parameters
40
20
0
−20
−40
−60
−80
6.1
6.15
6.2
6.25
Frequency, GHz
6.3
Figure 1: Effective material parameters of a lattice of canonical helices. See text for the
details of the mixture.
√
This restriction comes from the requirement that the wave numbers k± = k0 ( µǫ ± κ)
(for lossless media) should be positive. However, why is it necessary to have both wave
vectors positive? The answer to this is not obvious. Another way to justify the restriction
(8) is to consider the eigenvalues of the material matrix. These are—being the solutions
for the equation
Me = λe
(9)
for the eigenproblem—the following two values
s
2
ǫ−µ
ǫ+µ
±
+ κ2
λ1,2 =
2
2
(10)
Now, the usually accepted limitations (8) are seen to correspond to the requirement
that
λ1 ≥ 0, λ2 ≥ 0
(11)
In other words, the limitation means that the material matrix M be positive definite.
This, subsequently, corresponds to the condition that the sum of electric and magnetic
energy densities is positive:
We + Wm ∝ E · D + H · B ∝ e · Me
(12)
With this in mind it seems that the limitation (8) is rather reasonable. But locally we
can certainly violate the limitation. The Veselago medium, or a basic plasma medium
for example, as such violate against it. Should we have ǫ ≤ 0, the property is sufficient
to cause locally negative static energy density which is proportional to ǫ|E|2. Because
plasma is a well-documented real-world phenomenon, and also a 2D analogue of Veselago
4
2
Re(eps)
Im(eps)
Re(mu)
Im(mu)
Re(kappa)
Im(kappa)
Relative material parameters
1.5
1
0.5
0
−0.5
−1
−1.5
6.3
6.32
6.34
6.36
6.38
6.4
6.42
6.44
6.46
6.48
6.5
Frequency, GHz
Figure 2: The same as in Figure 1 for a narrow frequency range.
media has been fabricated in laboratories [8], we have to conclude that the restriction
is too tight. In fact, the nihility medium as well as Veselago medium possess strong
frequency dispersion, and the energy density should be calculated with this in mind [6].
The time-averaged energy density in a dispersive chiral medium with negligible losses is
expressed as [7]
1
2
∗ ∂(ωǫ)
∗ ∂(ωµ)
∗ ∂(ωκ)
hW it =
E ·
·E+H ·
· H + Im E ·
·H
(13)
4
∂ω
∂ω
c
∂ω
We will come back to the discussion of the energy density after considering possible wave
solutions in chiral nihility.
On the other hand, the requirement for the imaginary parts of the material parameters
for any medium
√
Im {ǫ} ≤ 0, Im {µ} ≤ 0, Im {κ} ≤ Im { ǫµ}
(14)
should hold, because the amplitude of a propagating wave should not grow exponentially
in a dissipative medium. And this is indeed the case. According to the model discussed
and applied in the previous section, we can see that the imaginary parts of the material
constants satisfy (14). Therefore also Im{k} < 0 which is necessary in order that the
wave propagation according to exp(−jkz) is not exponentially increasing.
4
Waves in chiral nihility materials
Let us next analyze waves in chiral nihility media. Taking the time dependence as
exp(jωt), the Maxwell equations for chiral nihility can be written as
∇ × E = k0 κE
∇ × H = k0 κH,
5
(15)
where k0 = ω/c is the wavevector in vacuum. Solutions of (15) are the eigenvectors of
the curl operator and describe the circularly-polarized waves with helicity parameter k0 κ.
At first look it seems that each of equations (15) determines independent “electric” and
“magnetic” waves, like Langmuir waves in plasmas. However, we have to remember that
the chiral nihility medium is obtained by the mixture of components having positive and
negative electric and magnetic polarizabilities which must be dispersive. Thus, we have
to adopt that electric and magnetic field are not independent but are connected via the
wave impedance
r
µ
η = η0 lim
(16)
ǫ→0,µ→0
ǫ
Of course in nihility the quotient of impedance has to be carefully defined as a limit
process. The limit µ/ǫ for ω → ω0 depends on the behavior ǫ(ω), µ(ω) in the vicinity of
ω0 . In our particular example (Figure 2) this value is close to the impedance of free space,
because the values of the effective permittivity and permeability are close in the vicinity
of the nihility point.
Assuming the wave propagation direction is along z-axis, solutions of equations (15)
can be written in form
Ex = e0 exp(∓jk0 κz)
Hx = ±je0 η −1 exp(∓jk0 κz)
Ey = ∓je0 exp(∓jk0 κz) Hy = e0 η −1 exp(∓jk0 κz)
Ez = 0
Hz = 0
(17)
where η is the wave impedance of chiral nihility (16) and the two signs correspond to the
phase advance direction along the positive or negative direction of axis z. Obviously, the
waves are circularly polarized with the opposite sense of rotation for the opposite propagation directions. The waves in chiral nihility propagate with the propagation constant
β = ±k0 κ and the phase velocity vp = ±c/κ, where c is the speed of light. The phase
velocity vp can be either subluminal if κ > 1 or superlumunal, if κ < 1.
Let us next discuss the group velocity of plane waves in chiral nihility. In usual chiral
media there exist two eigenwaves traveling along the positive z-direction with the phase
√
constants β1,2 = k0 ( ǫµ ± κ). For the inverse group velocity of these waves we obtain
√
√
ǫµ ω ∂( ǫµ)
∂β1,2
κ ω ∂κ
1
(18)
=
=
+
±
+
vgr1,2
∂ω
c
c ∂ω
c
c ∂ω
Usually, both these values are positive, and both eigenwaves are usual forward waves. The
√
other two eigensolutions have the oppositely directed phase vectors (β1,2 = −k0 ( ǫµ ±κ))
and, of course, their group velocities are negative of that given by (18). At the cross√
over point where ǫµ = 0 the eigensolutions become degenerate in terms of the phase
constants: we have only two waves with β = ±k0 κ instead of four. However, the group
√
velocities are still given by (18) with ǫµ = 0:
√
ω ∂( ǫµ)
κ ω ∂κ
1
=
(19)
±
+
vgr1,2
c ∂ω
c
c ∂ω
and there are still four different values for the group velocity of four eigenwaves (the other
two solutions are the negative of (19)). If we assume that at this special point both values
6
(19) are positive, as is generally the case in chiral media, then the conclusion is that one
of the two eigenwaves with positive group velocity has a negative phase velocity, that is,
one of the eigenwaves is a backward wave.
Let us consider the energy characteristics of the waves in chiral nihility. The timeaveraged Poynting vector can be written as [6]:
1
hPit = (E × H∗ + E∗ × H)
4
Substituting the fields (17) to (20), we obtain
(20)
hPit = e20 Y
(21)
√
∂( ǫµ)
η ∂ǫ
2 ∂µ
=
±Y
∂ω
2 ∂ω
∂ω
(23)
where Y = η −1 is the wave admittance, which is real for chiral nihility.
Assuming ǫ = 0, µ = 0 in the expression for the averaged energy density (13) and
substituting the fields (17) into (13), one obtains
e20
∂ǫ
∂κ
2Y
2 ∂µ
hW it =
ω
κ+ω
(22)
+Y ω
+
2
∂ω
∂ω
c
∂ω
Since the following holds
we can conclude that the energy velocity
ven =
hP it
hW it
(24)
coincides with the group velocity, expressed by equation (19).
In contrast to the usual chiral medium, where limitations for material parameters (8)
take place and both of right-hand and left-hand circularly polarized waves are forward
ones, in chiral nihility the left-hand polarized wave is the backward wave (here we assumed
κ > 0).
5
Wave reflection and refraction on a chiral nihility
interface
Let us consider a linearly polarized plane wave illuminating an interface between vacuum
ǫ1 = µ1 = 1 and chiral nihility ǫ2 = µ2 = 0, κ 6= 0. In the case of the normal incidence
such an incident wave excites right-hand and left-hand polarized waves in chiral nihility,
having equal amplitudes, the same directions of the energy flow (away from the source),
and the opposite phase velocities. If the wave impedance in chiral nihility is close to that
of free space, the reflected wave can be neglected. The total transmitted electric field can
be written as
E = E+ + E−
e0
e0
=
(x0 − jy0 ) exp (−jκk0 z) + (x0 + jy0 ) exp (jκk0 z)
2
2
= e0 (x0 cos κk0 z − y0 sin κk0 z)
7
(25)
Thus, the total electric field represents the wave of “standing phase”, whose amplitude
changes along z-axis in accordance with (25). Such a wave has infinite phase velocity,
but its energy velocity is expressed by equation (24). It can be easily shown that the
proper contributions to the Poynting vector from refracted left-hand and right-hand waves
have the same signs and their mutual (interference) time-averaged left-hand–right-hand
contribution is equal to zero. The field forms a standing spiral structure in space.
Vacuum
Θ2 +
Θ2 −
Θ1
Chiral nihility
Figure 3: An incident plane wave hits the boundary of an isotropic chiral nihility half
space. Note the two refracted rays. The refracted waves are circularly polarized, with the
opposite sense of rotation. The arrows show the directions of the power flow.
Next, let us consider oblique incidence of a linearly polarized plane wave from vacuum
half space (region 1) on an interface with a chiral nihility half space (region 2) according
to Figure 3. In the medium, there will propagate two circularly-polarized waves. The
Snellius law reads [4]
1
sin θ2± =
sin θ1
(26)
±κ
This means that the two refracted waves propagate at the angles θ2± , θ2− = −θ2+ to the
normal. Anomalous refraction takes place for the left-hand polarized wave, because that
wave is a backward-wave. We can conclude that in this case double refraction is possible
at an interface between two isotropic media. Moreover, one of the rays suffers anomalous
refraction, like in the Veselago medium. One can say that one of the eigenwaves in chiral
nihility sees an equivalent isotropic dielectric, but the other one sees a backward-wave
(Veselago) medium.
6
Concluding remarks
The present paper has introduced the concept of chiral nihility medium. Using the model
for a regular lattice of complex particles, a composite was modeled that displays parameters required for chiral nihility. The parameters of the material were found to be consistent
with the physical restrictions for complex media. Analyzing the field equations, we have
introduced the concept of wave impedance in nihility materials defined through a limit of
the permeablity/permittivity ratio. Also, wave propagation and refraction involving chiral
8
nihility media have been discussed. It has been found that the eigenwaves are circularly
polarized, like in isotropic chiral media, but one of the eigenwaves is a backward-wave, like
in Veselago media with double negative parameters. Note that materials with negative
parameters are sometimes called “left-handed” materials (because the triplet of vectors
E, H, and k is left-handed). This name can be especially confusing in the present case of
chiral nihility, where the left- or right-hand circularly polarized wave is a backward wave.
As such, handedness of chiral materials with helical inclusions has nothing in common
with the existence of backward waves in Veselago media. We have found that an interface
between an isotropic chiral nihility material and free space has a very interesting property of double refraction: the wave is split into two circularly polarized components, such
that one of them is refracted positively, but the other one is refracted negatively, like in
Veselago media. A helical standing wave pattern is formed in chiral nihility material, if
it is excited by a normally incident plane wave.
References
[1] A. Lakhtakia, An electromagnetic trinity from “negative permittivity” and “negative
permeability”, Int. J. Millimeter and Infrared Waves, vol. 22, pp. 1731-1734, 2001.
[2] A. Lakhtakia, On perfect lenses and nihility, Int. J. Millimeter and Infrared Waves,
vol. 23, pp. 339-343, 2002.
[3] J.B. Pendry, Negative refraction makes a perfect lens, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 85, pp.
3966-3969, 2001.
[4] I.V. Lindell, A.H. Sihvola, S.A. Tretyakov, and A.J. Viitanen: Electromagnetic waves
in chiral and bi-isotropic media, Artech House, Boston and London, 1994.
[5] S.A. Tretyakov, F. Mariotte, C.R. Simovski, T.G. Kharina, and J.-P. Heliot, Analytical antenna model for chiral scatterers: Comparison with numerical and experimental
data, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1006-1014,
1996.
[6] L.D. Landau, and E.M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of continuous media, Second Edition, Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1984.
[7] A. Serdyukov, I. Semchenko, S. Tretyakov, and A. Sihvola, Electromagnetics of bianisotropic materials. Theory and applications, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 2001.
[8] R.A. Shelby, D.R. Smith and S. Schultz, Experimental verification of a negative index
of refraction, Science, vol. 292, pp. 77-81, 2001.
9