zyxwv
THE INTERNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL IN PAPYROLOGY
Institute of Classical Studies
University of London
A REVIEW
PATRICK N. HUNT
The considerable success of the second International Summer School in Papyrology is largely
due to Professor Herwig Maehler and Dr Jennifer March who planned the lectures and
activities and assembled a stellar company of scholars at the Institute of Classical Studies from
July 17-23.
Mostly graduate students from twelve countries were offered current research in such wide
areas as decipherment, palaeography, textual criticism, interpretive methods, new literary and
documentary discoveries, archaeological principles and conservation techniques, and state-ofthe-art computing as they relate to papyrological studies. Where possible, the contributors
made applications to a broad spectrum of historical disciplines which have all profited from
papyrology, underscoring the need for even greater cross-fertilization between specialized
branches of study in Classics, particularly those pertaining to Graeco-Roman Egypt in
historical, epigraphic, and literary and philologic research.
In the opening lecture, Dr March (University College London) surveyed the importance of
papyrology in Classics, noting as well the physical properties and production, conditions for
survival, lectional signs, and diachronic linguistic benefits. Professor Maehler followed with
palaeographic decipherment rules, and suggested interpretive formulae for common and uncommon problems likely to be encountered. An excellent film documentary ‘Greek Papyri’,
introduced by Dr Walter Cockle (University College London), was also shown on the first day.
Proving especially informative as a summary of the history of papyrology, it was notable for its
archival record of the seminal Oxyrynchus expeditions under the direction of Grenfell and Hunt
from 1897 to 1906 and the following Egypt Exploration Society publications which have set
the standard for papyrological scholarship ever since. Thus supplied with appropriate tools,
including major research bibliographies and resources to be utilized, the students of the summer
school were well prepared for the subsequent week of specific papers and workshops.
Demonstrating the excitement along with challenges posed by new literary papyri
discoveries, Professor Eric Handley (university of Cambridge) magisterially outlined the state
of scholarship for new Menander texts and gave caveats on interpretive processes. In the same
vein Dr Peter Parsons (University of Oxford) brought brilliant light to a new papyrus of
Simonides, and Dr Annette Harder (University of Gronigen) reconstructed texts of
Callimachus’ Acfiu as they illuminate his literary output and enlarge on myth v;iriants.
Professor John Van Sickle (City University of New York) also provided convincing and
amusing insights into literary criticism with his research on interpretive pitf;ills in r e p r d to
zyxwvutsrq
zyxwvutsrq
zyxwvutsr
Archilochus’ Cologtw Epodc. Fine balance was struck for the Romanists as well with Dr Alan
Bowman’s lucid lecture on new Latin texts from Vindolanda.
Documentary papyrologists and ancient historians were also well represented by a wide
range of lectures. Professor Patricia Easterling (University College London) discussed the
unique contributions of Alexandrian scholarship to the modem as well as ancient world.
Especially significant was her emphasis on the systematic and encyclopaedic collection of texts
and the seminal textual criticism initiated by the first commentators, a fact often overshadowed
by the role the extant Alexandrian Library maintained in preserving what ancient texts we have.
In another illuminating address, Dr Rosaria Falivene (Instituto di Filologia Classica, Urbino)
presented via papyri carefully-drawn glimpses of Ptolemaic administration with the necessary
hierarchies of Greek and Egyptian officials imaged from texts of Arrian, Diodorus Siculus, and
others. In similar sleuthing, Dr Andrew Lewis (University College London) reconstructed the
operations of tribunals and the legal process in Roman Egypt in order to show how the legal
system reflected society in ideal and real terms. Reading from the court cases found in P .
Mich. 148, the students in the summer school were reminded of provincial legal praxes where
local culture interpenetrated Roman law and the importance of Roman Egypt’s tradition of
authoritative legal precedent in contrast to other provinces.
In other documentary matters, Dr John Ray (University of Cambridge) and Dr Jane
Rowlandson (Birkbeck College, London) with separate yet complementary lectures apprised us
of the very essence of Egyptian life at all times from the Pharaonic period onward as a
bureaucracy resting on the agricultural productivity of the peasant, as attested by the role and
flow of documents throughout Egypt. The point was made by Dr Ray that society was possibly
more heartless in Hellenistic Egypt than in Pharaonic Egypt and that Roman suppression of
Egyptian animal cult religions removed a popular asylum for the peasant anachoresis (or ‘runaway’) where family no longer served as natural protector for peasant troubles.
Highlighting the Oxford segment of the course was a discussion tour of the Papyrology
Rooms of the Ashmolean Museum, followed by an excellent address by Dr John Rea in which
he presented an exciting new document from the Roman prefect Rammius Martialis
corroborating accounts of Hadrian’s alacrity in assuming imperial authority in the provinces.
Such needed documentary details and insights demonstrate well the debt of ancient historians to
PaPYrologYPalaeographic foci were provided by Professor Maehler (University College London) with
several forays into Byzantine bookhands and diachronic orthography. In this same area, Mr
Robert Ireland (University College London) showed developments of Latin scripts in the Dark
Ages, specifically the Ductus litterarum (‘a sequence and direction of component strokes’) and
other techniques including pushed and pulled writing motions and stylus angles, concluding
with the exquisite spidery hands of the Ravenna and Merovingian chanceries. Likewise Mr
Joseph Spooner (University College London) demonstrated the subtleties of Ptolemaic
bookhands and their distinguishing factors, with dating criteria and epigraphic formulae to be
carefully applied. The cautions rigorously suggested by Mr Spooner in dating criteria for
Ptolemaic hands were much appreciated, clarifying the tenuous nature of such analyses.
Coptic research was addressed by Dr Mark Smith (University of Cambridge) and Ms. Julia
Clayton (Kings College London). Dr Smith surveyed Coptic magic in its eclectic yet syncretic
conservatism, exemplifying magic types as aphrodisiacal potions and spells, healing and
protection devices, maledictions and curses, and procurements of blessings or gifts in formulae.
Of note is Papyrus Berlin 8183 with its melange of Egyptian and Christian mythology and
magic, an attempt to manipulate nature into cosmic sympathy with those using such
P. N. HUNT
zyxwvut
161
‘grimoires’. Ms. Clayton clearly defined the role of Coptic documents in early Islamic life in
Egypt as adduced from period papyri which evidenced the oft-forgotten religious tolerance of
early Islam for other faiths.
Archaeological interests were illustrated by Dr Jaako Frosin (University of Helsinki) in
discussion and video demonstration of cartonnage removal and papyrus conservation, showing
new methods for extracting texts from mummy cases and the role these techniques can have in
future papyri discoveries. Dr Walter Cockle presented a superb slide lecture on epigraphic
remains, particularly ostraka, from recent archaeological expeditions to Mons Claudianus in the
eastern Egyptian desert, noted for Roman granite quarries and the nearby imperial porphyry
quarries. In allowing us to visualize the intensely arid conditions and other extremes of the
Mons Claudianus site, Dr Cockle was well able to trace some aspects of Roman stone
technology and dauntless appetite for exotic building materials. Also offered jointly by Dr
Cockle and this reviewer was an analytical session on a papyrus fragment from Oxyrynchus on
the scanning electron microscope at the Institute of Archaeology, utilizing high magnification
resolution (up to 100,000 x) and spectroscopic elemental analysis of the papyrus for
environmental traces.
Demonstrating the tremendous research advantages offered by computing of the highest
order, Dr Robert Sharples (University College London) gave several sessions on the Ibycus
hardware and software developed by Dr David Packard. With its nearly total program
assimilation of all Greek and Latin classical texts up to Late Antiquity (including the Thesaurus
Linprae Graecae and even the LXX as well as Hebrew O.T. for cross reference), the research
tools available in one of the newest model of the Ibycus at the Institute of Classical Studies
make word search possible on a definitive scale and underscores the indispensability of the
computer to modern scholarly pursuits.
Probably the highlights of the school were the several sessions of translation and
decipherment of papyri co-ordinated by Professor Maehler and Dr March. These practical
workshops gave each participant opportunity to test new textual critical skills or to hone prior
acquired skills in papyrological problem solving. Using quality photographs of both
documentary and literary papyri distributed at the outset of the school, these workshops
exposed students to the kinds of interpretive problems presented in the lectures and thus
reinforced theoretical with experiential knowledge, creating an optimum learning praxis.
Not all of the programme was entirely academic. An opening reception at Gordon House,
University College, and a splendid party at the Institute of Classical Studies with luminaries of
the Institute Committee of Management, University of London officers, Warburg Institute and
British Academy administrators provided ample opportunity for further social contact.
Culminating the activities was a wonderful luncheon for members of the course at Oxford, in
the rooms of Dr Peter Parsons at Christ Church.
Truly this was an international programme with both participants and lecturers representing
between them at least twenty institutions and countries, evidencing the broad response of
classicists to the discipline of papyrology. May such an event become assured of even greater
regularity. The host Institute of Classical Studies and Professor Maehler and Dr March should
be commended for a programme so beneficial to the continued development of classical
studies.
zyx
Simpson College, San Francisco