Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Sir Walter Scott’s Ivanhoe through the perspective of imagology

's Ivanhoe through the perspective of imagology Ivanhoe is a historical novel written by Sir Walter Scott and published in 1819. It is set in England during the 12 th century and depicts the antagonism between the Saxons and the Normans and the Jews, and how the lives of all the people were influenced by the Crusades. The book was so successful that it rekindled the interest in chivalry and medievalism, and shaped the perception of personalities like Richard the Lionheart, King John, and Robin Hood. (Scott 5) This essay will focus on the descriptions that represent ethnotypes, stereotypes, clichés about the cultures/races/groups that are defined in the novel.

Bourontzi Eirini Dimitra Sir Walter Scott’s Ivanhoe through the perspective of imagology Ivanhoe is a historical novel written by Sir Walter Scott and published in 1819. It is set in England during the 12th century and depicts the antagonism between the Saxons and the Normans and the Jews, and how the lives of all the people were influenced by the Crusades. The book was so successful that it rekindled the interest in chivalry and medievalism, and shaped the perception of personalities like Richard the Lionheart, King John, and Robin Hood. (Scott 5) This essay will focus on the descriptions that represent ethnotypes, stereotypes, clichés about the cultures/races/groups that are defined in the novel. Theory by Joep Leerssen, Imagology: History and Method. Joep Leerssen and his admirable work on the field of imagology will provide the theoretical background needed in order to analyze the novel Ivanhoe and the ethnic stereotypes it describes. First of all, we shall distinguish the difference between the notion of the ‘hetero-image’ and the ‘self-image’ as: ‘’those images which characterize the Other (hetero-images) and those which characterize one’s own, domestic identity (self-images or auto-images).’’ (Leerssen 27) In the case of the novel, we shall observe this distinction of ‘hetero-image’ and ‘self-image’ in the description of the two dominant oppositional groups, the Normans against the Saxons and the stereotypical image they each have for the other group, and the image they have for their own. At the same time, Leerssen claims that in order for these ‘national images’ to be formed there must be a comparative relationship between two national identities as is in the novel through the example of the Saxons against the Normans ‘’The study of national images is in and of itself a comparative enterprise: it addresses cross-national relations rather than national identities. Likewise, patterns of national characterization will stand out most clearly when studied supranationally as a multinational phenomenon.’’ (Leerssen 29) Finally, the premises that make this analysis possible is the written narrative which portrays these images of these groups and at the same time the intertextual background behind the text, which might be the social and historical context. ‘’Imagology is concerned with the representamen, representations as textual strategies and as discourse. That discourse implicitly raises a claim of referentiality vis-à-vis empirical reality, telling us that nation X has a set of characteristics Y, yet the actual validity of that referentiality claim is not the imagologist as to verify or falsify. The imagologist as frame of reference is a textual and intertextual one.’’ (Leerssen 27) Saracens/Muslims (Moslem)/Turks/Moors During the Crusades, the Saxons and Normans had to face Saracens/Muslims (Moslem)/Turks/Moors which they describe more or less in a negative manner and mostly as members of the same group. They were their enemies in a war that the Catholic Church had ordered so they are described as ‘heathens’, ‘infidels’, ‘followers of a wrong religion’, and ‘oriental’ in the sense that their style is weird, which in terms of the theory of imagology fits the category of the ‘hetero-image’, a description that another group has projected on them. Gurth and Wamba, two uneducated Saxons described Turks and Saracens thusly: “Nay, by St Mary, brother Brian, you must not think you are now in Palestine, predominating over heathen Turks and infidel Saracens; we islanders love not blows, save those of Holy Church, who chasteneth whom she loveth...” (Scott 29) In another scene a Crusader (either Norman or Saxon) considers a Saracen as misguided in his false religion: “Saracen,” said the Crusader, sternly, “blinded as thou art, and plunged amidst the errors of a false law, thou shouldst yet comprehend that there are some places more holy than others, and that there are some scenes also, in which the Evil One hath more than ordinary power over sinful mortals…” (Scott 45) Muslims on the other hand did not receive such harsh criticism, but they were also seen as strange, and exotic: ‘’These two squires were followed by two attendants, whose dark visages, white turbans, and the Oriental form of their garments, showed them to be natives of some distant Eastern country. The whole appearance of this warrior and his retinue was wild and outlandish’’. (Scott 26) From these quotes, we realize that Sir Walter Scott creates an opposition between the Norman and Saxon Crusaders and the Saracens and Muslims who seemed naïve, outlandish, and infidel heathens to the eyes of their military enemies. As imagology mandates, these descriptions are ‘hetero-images’ created by the Normans and Saxons due to their contradicting relationship, and we must always keep in mind the background of the war of the Crusades that mandated this antithetical description. In this case the Crusades act as our ‘intertextual background’ which means that the reader must bear in mind that the Saracens and Muslims were the enemies so they had to be described as inferior and in need of salvation for their misguided faith. Therefore, the Crusaders were convinced that they participated in a holy war. Normans VS Saxons The second step in the search for imagological stereotypes is between the ethnic groups of the Saxons and the Normans. Their differences are based on issues of religion, land, and language. Religion The first major issue that generates conflict is that of religion as ‘’Scott plays with the Protestant contrast between ‘good’ Saxons – the ‘pre-Roman’ Church in England – and the bad ‘Roman’ / French Normans.’’ (Rist 1) At the heart of the problem is the notion of ethics or lack of principles, as Normans were portrayed as the evil nobles who have refined manners but are less progressed when concerning loyalty and integrity which seem like a French trait stemming from Catholicism. Furthermore, the Normans are posed as evil because they have no compassion for the poor Saxons whom they rule with an absolute lust for power, a characteristic supported by the Catholic Church and the influence it has over the Crusaders and Templars in the Holy Land and England. ‘’The Catholic Church is represented by the Hospitallers and Templars – Military Orders supposedly created to defend Christianity but according to Scott a source of wickedness and overweening power.’’ (Rist 7) Based on this contradiction and the amount of power the Normans had, the Saxons are seen as lesser people, who are expected to abide by the authority of Prince John, the example par excellence of a cruel Norman ruler. From the point of view of imagology these previous descriptions were hetero-images, stereotypes that the two opposing groups projected on each other. It is also very crucial to keep in mind the ‘intertextual background’ of the conflict, meaning the religious opposition between the Saxons and the Normans. Land The Normans took the land of the Saxon nobles who in return hated them ever since. “To the Normans, the Saxons were crude, coarse, and uneducated. To the Saxons, the Normans were haughty, arrogant, and overly sophisticated”. (Admin) The reader tends to empathize with the plight of the Saxons whose lands were stolen, but they still consider themselves as proper patriots (self-image) because they still defend the land, their culture, and heritage. This antithesis is made prevalent in a scene when the Normans request hospitality from Lord Cedric (Ivanhoe’s father) during an engagement ceremony: With sly gavity, interrupted only by private signs to each other, the Norman knights and nobles beheld the ruder demeanour of Athelstane and Cedric at a banquet, to the form and fashion of which they were unaccustomed. And while their manners were thus the subject of sarcastic observation, the untaught Saxons unwittingly transgressed several of the arbitrary rules established for the regulation of society. (Scott 125) Language Language is a source and evidence of the conflicts between the two. “The Normans use Norman-French, which is the language of the king, the court and knights. Anglo-Saxon language is described as the language of peasants and that of a common man”: (Šmardová 16) ‘’At court, and in the castles of the great nobles, where the pomp and state of a court was emulated, Norman-French was the only language employed; in courts of law, the pleadings and judgements were delivered in the same tongue. In short, French was the language of honour, of chivalry, and even of justice, while the far more manly and expressive Anglo-Saxon was abandoned to the use of rustics and hinds, who knew no other’’. (Scott 18) Language acted as proof of the differences that could not be bridged between the two groups as the Normans seemed as educated and sophisticated and the Saxons as uneducated and crude. These conclusions are both ‘hetero-images’ that each of the groups had for the other and language is the battlefield of their contradiction. Jews In the novel, both Saxons and Normans exhibit a large amount of anti-Semitism. In medieval Europe laws and regulations forbade Jews to enter several professions and they were forced to practice usury. This led them to possess big amounts of wealth and this made them socially marginalized, despised, and a usual target for violence. “On these terms they lived; and their character, influenced accordingly, was watchful, suspicious, and timid – yet obstinate, uncomplying, and skilful in evading the dangers to which they were exposed.” (Kaiserman 151) The understanding of the reader is also based on our intertextual knowledge as Walter Scott uses stereotypes and ideas from Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice and the Jew character of Shylock. In a way, Scott tries to remedy the negative attention that Jewish characters have received over the years. The character that receives the most stereotypically negative description and at the same time manages to change it is Isaac the Jew. He is described as secretive, cowering, and greedy. Sir Walter Scott very cleverly changes these stereotypes slowly by proving Isaac’s character goes beyond these surface readings which stem from the way that Jews in Europe were treated. “Isaac’s continual fears of betrayal and persecution, for example, are justified since “there was no race existing on the earth, in the air, or the waters, who were the object of such an unremitting, general, and relentless persecution as the Jews of this period.” (Kaiserman 150) This description is based on the ‘hetero-image’ that the Normans and Saxons had towards the Jews, and they were based on stereotypes rather than Isaac himself. In this case, Isaac seems to be as a representative of the whole ethnic group, without actually fitting the pattern that the other groups inscribe on him. In the fifth chapter Isaac of York arrives at Cedric’s estate where he is accepted but not welcomed: Oswald, returning, whispered into the ear of his master, “It is a Jew, who calls himself Isaac of York; is it fit I should marshal him into the hall?” “Let Gurth do thine office, Oswald,” said Wamba with his usual effrontery; “the swineherd will be a fit usher to the Jew.” “St. Mary,” said the Abbot, crossing himself, “an unbelieving Jew, and admitted into this presence!” “A dog Jew,” echoed the Templar, “to approach a defender of the Holy Sepulchre?” “By my faith,” said Wamba, “it would seem the Templars love the Jews’ inheritance better than they do their company.” (Scott 46) Despite the initially stereotypical description, Isaac is also very loving towards his daughter Rebecca and very helpful towards Ivanhoe. He proves that he is a sensible and sensitive man when he is willing to give up all his money for his daughter’s life: “Take all that you have asked,” said he, “Sir Knight – take ten times more – reduce me to ruin and to beggary, if thou wilt, - nay, pierce me with thy poniard, broil me on that furnace, but spare my daughter, deliver her in safety and honour! – As thou art born of woman spare the honour of a helpless maiden – She is the image of my deceased Rachel, she is the last of six pledges of her love – Will you deprive a widowed husband of his sole remaining comfort? – Will you reduce a father to wish that his only living child were laid beside her dead mother, in the tomb of our fathers?” (Scott 180) Rebecca is described as an ideal character, noble, caring and brave, therefore a complete opposite to all the negative stereotypes that came along with being a Jew. Her exceptional traits are the reason Bois-Guilbert, the Norman Crusader, was drawn to her, despite all his negative preconceptions against the Jews. Walter Scott very cleverly poses Rebecca as the victim of a witch trial, but in the end her salvation is based on the help she receives from the Norman Bois-Guilbert and the Saxon Ivanhoe, therefore managing to break the stereotypes and bring the three groups together, united by a common cause. The first class set forth that Rebecca was heard to mutter to herself in an unknown tongue; that the songs she sung by fits were of a strangely sweet sound, which made the ears of the hearer tingle, and his heart throb; that she spoke at times to herself, and seemed to look upward for a reply; that her garments were of a strange and mystic form, unlike those of women of good repute; that she had rings impressed with cabalistical devices, and that strange characters were bordered on her veil. One of the soldiers had seen her work a cure upon a wounded man brought with them to the castle of Torquilstone. She did, he said, make certain signs upon the wound, and repeated certain mysterious words, which he blessed God he understood not, when the iron head of a square cross-bow bolt disengaged itself from the wound, the bleeding was staunched, the wound was closed, and the dying man was, within a quarter of an hour, walking upon the ramparts… (Scott 314) This quote was the summary of the accusations against Rebecca and the reason she was condemned seems to be based on the negative ‘hetero-image’ that the Saxons and Normans projected on Jewish women. These ethnic stereotypes of praying in a foreign language, wearing different clothes, and having the knowledge of medicine, prove that the Normans and Saxons only have a surface understanding of the Jews, rather than taking the time to know them and their customs. All these false ‘labels’ make the reader understand that the reality of the situation is not what it seems from a first reading, on the contrary, it is the ‘intertextual background’ that helps us comprehend that Rebecca was so much more than the witch she was accused of being. CONCLUSION Ivanhoe is a novel that tries to break the cultural stereotypes and give logical explanations behind the reasoning for their creation in the hopes of proposing a unified nation. By extension, we realize that this determination stems from Walter Scott’s own hopes that the English will cease to consider the Scotts less important and ultimately the two nations would be united and at ease with each other. At the same time, the novel is an excellent basis for ideas like the ‘hetero-image’ and ‘self-image’ that all the groups had, which were made prevalent during the scenes where the groups had to interact. All in all the overall feeling we get when reading the novel is that it is quite complicated and our conclusions are also based on other texts that deal with the Saxons, Normans, and most importantly the Jews that all the other groups hated. Works cited Admin, JL. “Ivanhoe by Walter Scott: Themes.” Jotted Lines, 3 Oct. 2020,jottedlines.com/ivanhoe-by-walter-scott themes Kaiserman, Aaron Samuel. Jews and the English Nation: An Intertextual Approach to Evolving Representations of Jews in British Fiction, 1701-1876. Thesis. University of Ottawa, Canada, 2016. Web. Leersen, Joep ‘’Imagology: History and Method”. Beller, Manfred and Joep Leerssen (eds). Imagology. The Cultural Construction and Literary Representation of National Characters. Amsterdam-New York, NY: Rodopi, 2007 Rist, Rebecca, Dr. "The Crusades, Catholic Piety and Chivalry in the Novels of Walter Scott,." Centaur Reading AC UK. Web. Scott, Sir Walter, Ivanhoe: A Romance, E Books Directory, 1998 Šmardová, Lenka. Bipolarities of Scott’s Ivanhoe and Their Romantic Aspect. Thesis. Masaryk University Brno, 2006. Web.